Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Radiological Analysis of Odontogenic Sinusitis: A Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Pneumonia Patients Aged 80 and Above in Intensive Care
Previous Article in Journal
The Usefulness of Testosterone in Saliva Tests to Detect Testosterone Deficiency in Men with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Single-Center Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Approach to Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Hosts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Europe: A 3-Year Retrospective Study

1
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Medical Microbiology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
3
Doctoral School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082820
Submission received: 16 March 2025 / Revised: 7 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 19 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Acute Severe Respiratory Infections)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: This study examines the clinical characteristics of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PjP) in non-Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients in Hungary to describe its local epidemiological properties. Methods: Our study was conducted at a clinical center with more than 1700 beds at the University of Debrecen in Hungary. We included all patients without HIV infection for whom a diagnostic evaluation for Pneumocystis infection had been requested between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2024. Results: In total, 21 cases of PjP were identified from 122 requests at the University of Debrecen Clinical Center between 2022 and 2024. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 43% in PjP. Admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR] 5.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87–14.09, p = 0.001), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.45–12.14, p = 0.015) and hematological malignancies (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.23–9.18, p = 0.024), were associated with Pneumocystis PCR positivity. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between elevated levels of C-reactive protein (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1–1.01, p = 0.001), 30-day mortality (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.09–7.92, p = 0.049), and Pneumocystis PCR positivity. Regarding diagnostic platforms used, Fujifilm Wako assay detected serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan positivity (>7 pg/mL) from 352 copies/mL in non-HIV patients with probable PJP. Conclusions: Our study serves as a gap-filling investigation, providing an overview of Pneumocystis epidemiology in the Central European region.

1. Introduction

Pneumocystis jirovecii is an opportunistic fungal pathogen, classified as a medium-priority pathogen in the fungal priority list published by the World Health Organization [1]. Predisposing factors for P. jirovecii-related pneumonia (PjP) include transplantation, hematological malignancies, inflammatory or rheumatologic conditions, and related therapies that impair cell-mediated immunity [2,3,4]. PjP is no longer restricted to Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients but is increasingly diagnosed in non-HIV populations, posing new challenges for diagnosis and treatment [2,3,4]. In case of HIV-positive patients, the onset of PJP is usually gradual and insidious with limited radiologic findings, while in immunocompromised non-HIV individuals, clinical presentation tends to be more acute with rapid emergence of respiratory symptoms and with a mortality rate twice that of HIV-infected individuals, ranging from 30% to 60% [4,5,6].
P. jirovecii is globally distributed; however, data on its prevalence and incidence in Central and/or Eastern European populations are limited. The incidence of PjP in Central and Eastern European countries has been reported to range from 0.18 to 0.88 per 100,000 admissions [7,8,9]. However, these data usually pertain to HIV-infected patients, and there are no reliable data on the non-HIV population in this region.
Hence, the primary aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the epidemiological data and the clinical characteristics of P. jirovecii infection among HIV-negative patients in one of the largest tertiary care centers in Hungary, thereby enhancing our understanding of P. jirovecii infections.

2. Materials and Methods

Our study was conducted at a clinical center with more than 1700 beds at the University of Debrecen in Hungary. We included all patients without HIV infection for whom a diagnostic evaluation for Pneumocystis infection had been requested between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2024. In case of PJP diagnosis, we followed the EORTC/MSGERC revised definitions for P. jirovecii disease, where the triad of host factors, clinical characteristics, and mycologic tests was considered [10]. The diagnosis of PjP was based on the administration of therapeutic doses of corticosteroid therapy and CD4+ lymphocyte count (where it was available); the presence of suggestive clinical criteria including fever, respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough, dyspnea, hypoxemia), bilateral or diffuse ground-glass opacity on X-ray with interstitial infiltrates; and a positive microbiological diagnostic test, including the detection of (1-3)-β-D-glucan in blood and/or a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result from a bronchoalveolar lavage specimen or induced sputum [10] Notably, our laboratory does not perform microscopy-based examinations; therefore, according to the EORTC/MSGERC guideline, we can establish only probable PJP results [10]. In clinical practice, we adhere to the diagnostic algorithm for PJP as outlined in Table 1.
Demographic data, underlying medical conditions, hematological parameters, blood gas parameters, and details of antimicrobial therapy were collected from the patients’ medical records. Concurrent bacteremia and/or fungaemia were defined as the isolation of potentially pathogenic microbes from blood culture samples at the time of Pneumocystis infection. PjP outcomes were monitored from the initial diagnosis until 30 days post-diagnosis or death. Regarding Pneumocystis laboratory diagnosis, copy numbers and serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan levels were obtained using the Pneumocystis ELITe MGB® Kit (Elitech Group SAS, Puteaux, France) and the Fujifilm Wako assay (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan), respectively. The limit of detection of polymerase chain reaction is <97 copies/mL, while the cut-off value of Fujifilm Wako assay is 7 pg/mL.
Univariable analysis was performed to reveal those factors, which are associated with PCR positivity. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. In the case of continuous variables, a logistic regression model was used and based on the distribution of the data, the Mann–Whitney test was used for non-normally distributed variables. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version no.: 10.1.1). Results were considered significant if the p-value was <0.05.

3. Results

In total, 122 requests for P. jirovecii diagnosis were registered from non-HIV patients during the investigation period, of which 21 were probable PJP according to EORTC/MSGRC guidelines [10]. PjP diagnosis was based on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid positivity in 33% of cases (seven lavage samples were PCR-positive). In eight patients, the diagnosis was based on bronchial specimen positivity, while six patients had a positive induced sputum sample. The number of requests increased continuously, with 18, 31, and 73 registered in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Notably, the increase in the number of requests is not specific to Pneumocystis; it reflects a general trend across all areas of microbiology in the post-COVID-19 era at our clinical center. The demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of Pneumocystis-positive patients, as well as the results of laboratory tests performed, are presented in Table 2.
Intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and hematological malignancy were observed in 52%, 33%, and 43% of patients with positive Pneumocystis PCR results, respectively. The majority of patients (79 out of 122 [65%]) were male, and the median age was 61 years (range: 3 to 98 years). Based on the results of univariable analysis, intensive care unit admission (OR 5.44, 95% CI 1.87–14.09, p = 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.45–12.14, p = 0.015), hematological malignancy (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.23–9.18, p = 0.024), and 30-day mortality (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.09–7.92, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with Pneumocystis PCR positivity (Table 1).
Focusing on the applied therapies, the use of glucocorticoids, chemotherapeutic agents, and monoclonal antibodies has been shown to significantly increase the risk of PJP [11]. In our study, corticosteroid therapy (OR 15.44, 95% CI 2.49–164.2, p = 0.0004), intravenous antibiotic use (OR 7.14, 95% CI 2.05–23.86, p = 0.0007), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim therapy (OR 21.00, 95% CI 6.12–61.00, p < 0.0001), chemotherapeutic agents (OR 4.50, 95% CI 1.59–11.75, p = 0.007), and monoclonal antibody treatment (OR 7.68, 95% CI 2.12–26.13, p = 0.0034) were significantly associated with positive Pneumocystis PCR results (Table 2).
Among PCR-positive cases, 12 patients (57%) presented with fever, although its presence and severity may have been influenced by concurrent therapies. Furthermore, all PCR-positive patients exhibited bilateral or diffuse ground-glass opacities with interstitial infiltrates on chest X-ray. Notably, none of the Pneumocystis-positive patients had undergone solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CD4+ cell count data were available for 11 PCR-positive patients (52%), of whom four died. The mean CD4+ cell count was 1005 ± 491 cells/mm3, with a range of 120 to 1740 cells/mm3.
Bacterial and/or fungal bloodstream co-infections were reported in 13 (11%) cases and 3 (2%) cases, respectively. It is noteworthy that concomitant bacteraemia (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.15–11.5, p = 0.047) was associated with positive Pneumocystis PCR results (Table 2). Bacterial and/or fungal respiratory co-infections were present in 38% of PjP cases, including Escherichia coli (two cases), Staphylococcus aureus (three cases), Klebsiella pneumoniae (three cases), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (one case). Among the laboratory parameters examined, C-reactive protein was significantly elevated in PCR-positive cases compared to PCR-negative cases (p = 0.001) (Table 2). Regarding microbiological diagnosis, the median of quantitative PCR copy numbers 195 copies/mL, ranging from 97 to 684,201. Positive serum (1–3)-β-D-glucan levels were detected in 7 of the 21 cases.

4. Discussion

Based on large-scale national epidemiological data, there has been a significant increase in the prevalence and incidence of PjP in non-HIV patients [2,3,4,6,12]. This concerning trend is attributed to the extensive use of corticosteroids and the increased implementation of organ and stem cell transplantation [2,3,4,6,12]. In line with previously published studies, the most common immunocompromising conditions observed in our study were hematological and solid malignancies, which is consistent with findings in hospitalized patients with PjP in general [2,13]. In addition, hematological malignancies showed a significant relationship with Pneumocystis PCR positivity. In this study, 95% of patients had received corticosteroid therapy—a well-known predisposing factor for PjP [2,3,4]—which, along with chemotherapeutic drugs, was associated with Pneumocystis PCR positivity. Notably, the observed 30-day mortality was significantly higher (43%) compared to the HIV-infected population (approximately 10–15%) [5,6,7,8,9,10] and demonstrated a clear correlation with PCR positivity. Focusing on additional risk factors in Pneumocystis PCR-positive patients, only 2 of the 11 available CD4+ cell count values were below 200. A previously published systematic reviews concluded that a CD4+ cell count of less than 200 was a reliable biomarker of “high risk” category in immunocompromised non-HIV patients [14,15]. Nevertheless, higher CD4+ cell number does not exclude the possibility of PJP as described by Koifman et al. [16].
In this study, 23% of the patients required admission to the intensive care unit, while 15% received invasive mechanical ventilation. Notably, both factors were significantly more common among patients showing Pneumocystis PCR positivity. Schmidt et al. [17] reported that more than 40% of patients required intensive care unit admission, with 36% needing invasive mechanical ventilation. According to previous data, 16% of HIV-positive and 50% to 60% of non-HIV patients require mechanical ventilation during PjP hospitalization [18,19]. Monnet et al. [20] reported a 62% mortality rate among patients who required mechanical ventilation. These previously published findings are consistent with our results.
Although diagnostic tests have improved over the last decade, several laboratory parameters can further support diagnosis. These parameters may differ between HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals. In our study, C-reactive protein was elevated and was significantly higher among patients who showed a positive Pneumocystis PCR result; however, the degree of elevation is generally lower compared to that observed in bacterial infections [21]. Sage et al. [21] demonstrated that HIV-infected patients with PjP showed a significant association between elevated C-reactive protein levels, disease severity, and poor outcomes.
Based on EORTC/MSGERC guideline, the diagnosis of proven PJP is based on clinical and radiological criteria with microscopic visualization of P. jirovecii in respiratory specimens [10]. Although, PCR-based platforms are more sensitive than microscopic examination for the detection of P. jirovecii, their sensitivity does not support the differentiation between proven PJP and colonization with P. jirovecii. In addition, in the HIV-negative immunocompromised population, the differentiation between P. jirovecii colonization and active PjP remains further challenging, especially in the intensive care unit where PCR-based diagnostics are commonly used. Previous studies have shown that a significant proportion of PCR-positive cases in these patients may show colonization rather than true infection [22,23]. A multicenter retrospective study involving intensive care unit patients with severe pneumonia described that nearly 40% of those who showed Pneumocystis PCR positivity were classified as colonized, not infected. In case of these cases, lower lymphocyte counts and higher rates of viral co-infections (e.g., Cytomegalovirus and Epstein–Barr virus) were observed compared with patients with confirmed PjP [24]. Another major finding of this study was that P. jirovecii colonization was an independent predisposing factor for increased 28-day mortality, suggesting the clinical significance of the presence of P. jirovecii without active infection [24]. According to EORTC/MSGERC, all nucleic acid amplification tests should be validated in the appropriate clinical context (e.g., non-HIV patients vs. HIV patients) to define the thresholds of colonization and definitive PJP [10]. Quantitative PCR combined with serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan determination may aid in distinguishing disease from colonization. However, because of methodological variability, there is no universally accepted cut-off value to differentiate between the two [3].
In our study, the measured copy numbers could suggest either colonization or infection. Generally, the P. jirovecii load is significantly lower in non-HIV patients. Previous studies indicate that positive PCR values below 1450 copies/mL may be associated with both colonization and infection in the HIV-negative population, and patients with low pathogen densities (85 copies/mL) may still have PjP [22,23]. Serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan determination has good sensitivity and a high negative predictive value in HIV-positive patients with PjP. However, its cut-off values are not well defined, and its sensitivity in HIV-positive patients was higher than those without HIV (94% vs. 86%) with similar specificity [25,26]. Jiang et al. (2025) [24] shows that the serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentration in patients colonized with P jirovecii is lower than in patients with PjP. However, data from several patients with P jirovecii colonization were higher than normal values.
In light of these considerations, the differentiation between Pneumocystis colonization and active infection remains a significant diagnostic challenge in the present study; nonetheless, the combination of quantitative PCR and serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan determination may result in superior diagnostic performance. In our study, Fujifilm Wako assay detected serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan positivity (>7 pg/mL) from 352 copies/mL in non-HIV patients with probable PJP. As we wrote above, our laboratory did not perform microscopy-based examination during the observation period; therefore, we could not establish a proven diagnosis of P. jirovecii infection. Based on our local diagnostic algorithm, real-time PCR is recommended as the principal microbiological diagnostic test for PjP, while serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan testing may be performed as an adjunctive test. A positive real-time PCR result with compatible clinical course and chest X-ray or computer tomography findings is indicative of the definitive diagnosis of PjP. Furthermore, our local algorithm recommends consultation with an infectious disease specialist to differentiate true infection from colonization.
For the sake of completeness, some limitations of this study should be highlighted. First, the analysis was conducted at a single center; therefore, the number of Pneumocystis-positive patients was relatively small, limiting the depth of statistical analysis. Second, our laboratory does not perform microscopy-based examination; therefore, according to the EORTC/MSGERC guideline, we can provide only probable PJP results [10]. Furthermore, this guideline wrote that CD4+ cell count of less than 200 was a sensitive biomarker of “high risk” in immunocompromised patients without HIV [10]; however, here we could receive this data only from the 52% of involved PCR positive patients, which may undermine the uniformity of case definition. Despite these limitations, this study serves as a gap-filling investigation, providing an overview of Pneumocystis epidemiology in the Central European region.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Á.J., A.H. and R.K.; methodology, Á.J., A.H. and R.K.; software, R.K.; validation, R.K.; formal analysis, R.K.; investigation, Á.J., A.H. and R.K.; resources, J.K. and L.M.; data curation, R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Á.J., A.H. and R.K.; writing—review and editing, R.K. and L.M.; visualization, R.K.; supervision, R.K.; project administration, Á.J., A.H. and R.K.; funding acquisition, A.H., R.K. and Z.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.H. was supported by the EKÖP-24-0 University Research Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund. R.K. was supported by the Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (BO/00127/21/8). This research was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH FK138462 and Starting 150834).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee at the University of Debrecen, Regional and Institutional Research Ethics Committee (DE RKEB/IKEB) (permission number 6968-2024). The approval date is 30 October 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

According to local ethics committee’s decision, no specific informed consent from patients was required for this study. Based on the published data, the identification of given patients is not possible.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PjPPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
HIVHuman Immunodeficiency Virus
EORTC/MSGERCEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group/Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium
PCRPolymerase chain reaction

References

  1. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens Report. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241 (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  2. Fillatre, P.; Decaux, O.; Jouneau, S.; Revest, M.; Gacouin, A.; Robert-Gangneux, F.; Fresnel, A.; Guiguen, C.; Le Tulzo, Y.; Jégo, P.; et al. Incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia among groups at risk in HIV-negative patients. Am. J. Med. 2014, 127, 1242.e11–1242.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services. AIDS Info: Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV—Pneumocystis Pneumonia. 2023. Available online: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infections/pneumocystis-0?view=full (accessed on 16 September 2024).
  4. Quigley, N.; d’Amours, L.; Gervais, P.; Dion, G. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis Use for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in the Non-HIV Population: A Retrospective Study in Québec, Canada. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023, 11, ofad639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. KIofteridis, D.P.; Valachis, A.; Velegraki, M.; Antoniou, M.; Christofaki, M.; Vrentzos, G.E.; Andrianaki, A.M.; Samonis, G. Predisposing factors, clinical characteristics and outcome of Pneumonocystis jirovecii pneumonia in HIV-negative patients. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2014, 88, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mundo, W.; Morales-Shnaider, L.; Tewahade, S.; Wagner, E.; Archuleta, S.; Bandali, M.; Chadalawada, S.; Johnson, S.C.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Shapiro, L.; et al. Lower Mortality Associated With Adjuvant Corticosteroid Therapy in Non-HIV-Infected Patients With Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: A Single-Institution Retrospective US Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mareș, M.; Moroti-Constantinescu, V.R.; Denning, D.W. The Burden of Fungal Diseases in Romania. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Arsenijević, V.A.; Denning, D.W. Estimated Burden of Serious Fungal Diseases in Serbia. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chrdle, A.; Mallátová, N.; Vašáková, M.; Haber, J.; Denning, D.W. Burden of serious fungal infections in the Czech Republic. Mycoses 2015, 58, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lagrou, K.; Chen, S.; Masur, H.; Viscoli, C.; Decker, C.F.; Pagano, L.; Groll, A.H. Pneumocystis jirovecii Disease: Basis for the Revised EORTC/MSGERC Invasive Fungal Disease Definitions in Individuals Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, S114–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, R.; Huh, K.; Kang, C.K.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.; Park, J.S.; Park, J.Y.; Sung, H.; Jung, J.; et al. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Non-HIV Immunocompromised Patient in Korea: A Review and Algorithm Proposed by Expert Consensus Group. Infect. Chemother. 2025, 57, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bienvenu, A.L.; Traore, K.; Plekhanova, I.; Bouchrik, M.; Bossard, C.; Picot, S. Pneumocystis pneumonia suspected cases in 604 non-HIV and HIV patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 46, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kamel, T.; Janssen-Langenstein, R.; Quelven, Q.; Chelly, J.; Valette, X.; Le, M.P.; Bourenne, J.; Garot, D.; Fillatre, P.; Labruyere, M.; et al. Pneumocystis pneumonia in intensive care: Clinical spectrum, prophylaxis patterns, antibiotic treatment delay impact, and role of corticosteroids. A French multicentre prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2024, 50, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Messiaen, P.E.; Cuyx, S.; Dejagere, T.; van der Hilst, J.C. The role of CD4 cell count as discriminatory measure to guide chemoprophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-negative immunocompromised patients: A systematic review. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017, 19, e12651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giacobbe, D.R.; Dettori, S.; Di Pilato, V.; Asperges, E.; Ball, L.; Berti, E.; Blennow, O.; Bruzzone, B.; Calvet, L.; Capra Marzani, F.; et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in intensive care units: Amulticenter study by, E.S.G.C.I.P.; EFISG. Crit. Care 2023, 27, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Koifman, M.; Vachhani, B.; Haridasan, K.S.; Mansur, M. Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in a Patient With Newly Diagnosed HIV and a High CD4 Count. Cureus 2023, 15, e46680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schmidt, J.J.; Lueck, C.; Ziesing, S.; Stoll, M.; Haller, H.; Gottlieb, J.; Eder, M.; Welte, T.; Hoeper, M.M.; Scherag, A.; et al. Clinical course, treatment and outcome of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised adults: A retrospective analysis over 17 years. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, S.J.; Lee, J.; Cho, Y.J.; Park, Y.S.; Lee, C.H.; Yoon, H.I.; Lee, S.M.; Yim, J.J.; Lee, J.H.; Yoo, C.G.; et al. Prognostic factors of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients without HIV infection. J. Infect. 2014, 69, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wan, R.; Bai, L.; Yan, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, Q.; Huang, H.; Huang, L.; Xiang, Z.; Luo, Q.; Gu, Z.; et al. A Clinically Applicable Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 850741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Monnet, X.; Vidal-Petiot, E.; Osman, D.; Hamzaoui, O.; Durrbach, A.; Goujard, C.; Miceli, C.; Bourée, P.; Richard, C. Critical care management and outcome of severe Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with and without HIV infection. Crit. Care 2008, 12, R28, Erratum in Crit. Care 2009, 13, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sage, E.K.; Noursadeghi, M.; Evans, H.E.; Parker, S.J.; Copas, A.J.; Edwards, S.G.; Miller, R.F. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in HIV-infected patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Int. J. STD AIDS 2010, 21, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alanio, A.; Hauser, P.M.; Lagrou, K.; Melchers, W.J.; Helweg-Larsen, J.; Matos, O.; Cesaro, S.; Maschmeyer, G.; Einsele, H.; Donnelly, J.P.; et al. ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies stem cell transplant recipients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2386–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mühlethaler, K.; Bögli-Stuber, K.; Wasmer, S.; von Garnier, C.; Dumont, P.; Rauch, A.; Mühlemann, K.; Garzoni, C. Quantitative PCR to diagnose Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised non-HIV patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 39, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiang, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhou, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, S.; Ren, X.; He, G.; Xu, J.; Wang, Q.; Dai, M.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Severe Pneumonia With Pneumocystis jirovecii Colonization: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study. Chest 2025, 167, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Taniguchi, J.; Nakashima, K.; Matsui, H.; Watari, T.; Otsuki, A.; Ito, H.; Otsuka, Y. Low cut-off value of serum (1,3)-beta-D-glucan for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in non-HIV patients: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Del Corpo, O.; Butler-Laporte, G.; Sheppard, D.C.; Cheng, M.P.; McDonald, E.G.; Lee, T.C. Diagnostic accuracy of serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Diagnostic algorithm used in our laboratory in the absence of microscopy-based investigation.
Table 1. Diagnostic algorithm used in our laboratory in the absence of microscopy-based investigation.
CriteriaInterpretation
Clinical presentationClinical symptoms suggestive of PjP and bilateral or diffuse ground-glass opacity on X-ray with interstitial infiltrates.Suggest possible PjP infection
PCR for P. jiroveciiPositive PCR result from respiratory sample Indicates presence of P. jirovecii DNA
Detection of serum (1-3)-β-D-glucanElevated above diagnostic thresholdSuggests fungal infection, supports P. jirovecii PCR as adjunctive test
Final diagnosisClinical signs + Positive PCR (+elevated (1-3)-β-D-glucan)Probable PJP diagnosis, further expert consultation may be needed
Table 2. Microbiological characteristics and clinical variables for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniae in HIV-negative patients.
Table 2. Microbiological characteristics and clinical variables for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniae in HIV-negative patients.
VariablesTotalPneumocystis PCR PositivePneumocystis PCR NegativeOdds Ratio95% Confidence Intervals (CI)p-Value
122 (100%)21 (17%)101 (83%)
Demographic
Age
≤50 years33 (27%)6 (29%)27 (27%)1.10.38–3.05>0.999
>50 years89 (73%)15 (71%)74 (73%)0.910.33–2.62>0.999
Gender
Female43 (35%)7 (33%)36 (36%)0.900.35–2.36>0.999
Male79 (65%)14 (67%)65 (64%)1.110.42–2.84>0.999
Clinical presentation
Healthcare-associated risk factors
Intensive Care Unit28 (23%)11 (52%)17 (17%)5.441.87–14.090.001 1
Days in Intensive Care Unit (median and range)0 (0–58)3 (0–33)0 (0–58)1.020.99–1.060.253
Invasive mechanical ventilation18 (15%)7 (33%)11 (11%)4.091.45–12.140.015 1
Underlying comorbidities
Autoimmune disease9 (7%)2 (10%)7 (7%)1.410.28–7.480.652
Diabetes mellitus22 (18%)1 (5%)21 (21%)0.190.02–1.270.118
Renal failure15 (12%)2 (10%)13 (13%)0.710.15–3.34>0.999
Hematological malignancy28 (23%)9 (43%)19 (19%)3.241.23–9.180.024 1
Solid malignancy28 (23%)5 (24%)23 (23%)1.060.39–3.19>0.999
Chronic obstructive airway disease (COPD)13 (11%)3 (14%)10 (10%)1.520.41–5.270.696
Co-infections
Bacteriaemia13 (11%)5 (24%)8 (8%)3.631.15–11.50.047 1
Fungaemia3 (2%)1 (5%)2 (2%)2.480.16–21.860.436
Adenovirus infection4 (3%)1 (5%)3 (3%)1.630.12–11.380.535
Cytomegalovirus infection4 (3%)2 (10%)2 (2%)5.210.76–34.130.137
Epstein–Barr virus infection5 (4%)1 (5%)4 (4%)1.210.09–8.06>0.999
Treatment
Corticosteroid therapy77 (63%)20 (95%)57 (56%)15.442.49–164.20.0004 1
Prednisone therapy (≥0.3 mg/kg)70 (57%)16 (76%)54 (53%)2.790.99–7.30.088
Receipt of systemic antibiotics64 (52%)18 (86%)46 (46%)7.142.05–23.860.0007 1
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim34 (28%)17 (81%)17 (17%)216.12–61<0.0001 1
Receipt of systemic antifungal37 (30%)8 (38%)29 (29%)1.530.56–4.010.438
Chemotherapeutic drugs58 (48%)16 (76%)42 (42%)4.51.59–11.750.007 1
Monoclonal antibodies11 (9%)6 (29%)5 (5%)7.682.12–26.130.0034 1
Mortality
30-day mortality30 (25%)9 (43%)21 (21%)2.861.09–7.920.049 1
Laboratory results
Blood parameters (mean with range)
White blood cell count (giga/L)10.2 (0.1–44.4)10.2 (0.1–32.5)10.2 (0.6–44.4)10.94–1.070.99
Neutrophil granulocyte count (giga/l)8.1 (0.3–40.6)7 (0.3–16.8)8.4 (0.6–40.6)0.960.87–1.050.371
Lymphocyte count (giga/L)1.8 (0.1–29.5)2.7 (0.1–29.2)1.5 (0.2–29.5)1.120.94–1.350.213
Creatinine (μM/L)100 (4–766)115 (27–766)96 (4–479)11–1.010.448
C-reactive protein (mg/L)89.5 (0.5–507)156 (1.8–507)72.9 (0.5–277.2)1.011–1.010.001 1
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)296 (2–4863)369 (37–913)267 (2–4863)11–10.502
Blood gas parameters (mean with range)
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) (Hgmm)41.6 (2.3–66)36 (2.3–58)48.2 (26–66)0.9480.89–1.010.097
Partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) (Hgmm)54.2 (2.3–90)52.8 (2.3–89)55.9 (29–90)0.9950.96–1.030.775
Bicarbonate (HCO3) (mmol/L)27 (16–41.2)27.1 (16.7–40.3)26.9 (16–41.2)10.89–1.130.929
Base excess in blood (BE) (mmol/L)1.8 (−13–16.6)2.2 (−13–14.2)1.2 (−8.7–16.6)1.020.91–1.150.744
1 Significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jakab, Á.; Harmath, A.; Tóth, Z.; Majoros, L.; Kónya, J.; Kovács, R. Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Europe: A 3-Year Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082820

AMA Style

Jakab Á, Harmath A, Tóth Z, Majoros L, Kónya J, Kovács R. Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Europe: A 3-Year Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(8):2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jakab, Ágnes, Andrea Harmath, Zoltán Tóth, László Majoros, József Kónya, and Renátó Kovács. 2025. "Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Europe: A 3-Year Retrospective Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 8: 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082820

APA Style

Jakab, Á., Harmath, A., Tóth, Z., Majoros, L., Kónya, J., & Kovács, R. (2025). Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Europe: A 3-Year Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(8), 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop