This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
by
Alexandra A. Brandtzäg
Alexandra A. Brandtzäg 1,
Jonas P. Eiberg
Jonas P. Eiberg 1,2,3
,
Mikkel Taudorf
Mikkel Taudorf 2,4,
Lars Lonn
Lars Lonn 2,4
and
Timothy A. Resch
Timothy A. Resch 1,2,*
1
Department of Vascular Surgery, The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for HR & Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
4
Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8507; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238507 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 October 2025
/
Revised: 21 November 2025
/
Accepted: 28 November 2025
/
Published: 30 November 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) due to superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis can be effectively treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). Appropriate intraoperative assessment is crucial for ensuring technical success and long-term patency. This study assesses intra-arterial pressure measurement (IAPM), and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting residual stenosis during SMA stenting in CMI. Methods: This prospective study included 50 consecutive elective patients with symptomatic, significant SMA stenosis scheduled for EVT. The patients in this study were a subset of an ongoing randomized trial with a different primary objective. Intraoperative diagnostic tools—digital subtraction angiography (DSA), IAPM and CBCT were performed after stent placement. Technical success was defined as <30% residual stenosis on DSA, a residual pressure gradient of <10 mmHg with IAPM and full stent expansion on CBCT. Results: Although there was a fair agreement between DSA and CBCT (Kappa 0.294, p = 0.024), the Odds ratio suggests that DSA detected fewer positive cases compared to CBCT (Odds ratio 0.176; 95% CI: 0.004–1.37; p = 0.13). DSA also differed significantly from IAPM (Kappa = 0.016, p = 0.882), (Odds ratio = 0.167; 95% CI: 0.018–0.749; p = 0.013), suggesting DSA under-detects residual stenosis (>10 mmHg). No significant difference was found between CBCT and IAPM (Kappa = 0.201, p = 0.161) (Odds ratio: 2.25, 95% CI: 0.628–10.0%; p = 0.27) indicating comparable results. Conclusions: DSA overlooks clinically important residual stenosis that could be treated during the primary procedure. CBCT aids structural assessment of the stent and allows for on-table optimizing of the procedural outcomes.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Brandtzäg, A.A.; Eiberg, J.P.; Taudorf, M.; Lonn, L.; Resch, T.A.
Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8507.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238507
AMA Style
Brandtzäg AA, Eiberg JP, Taudorf M, Lonn L, Resch TA.
Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(23):8507.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238507
Chicago/Turabian Style
Brandtzäg, Alexandra A., Jonas P. Eiberg, Mikkel Taudorf, Lars Lonn, and Timothy A. Resch.
2025. "Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 23: 8507.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238507
APA Style
Brandtzäg, A. A., Eiberg, J. P., Taudorf, M., Lonn, L., & Resch, T. A.
(2025). Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), 8507.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238507
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.