Impact of 50 g OGTT-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia on Uteroplacental and Fetoplacental Circulations in Gestational Diabetes Screening: A Prospective Single-Center Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Population and Sample
2.3. OGTT and Doppler USG Procedures
2.4. Analysis of Doppler Waves
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nicolaides, K.H.; Bilardo, C.M.; Soothill, P.W.; Campbell, S. Absence of end diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery: A sign of fetal hypoxia and acidosis. Br. Med. J. 1988, 297, 1026–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Vyas, S.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Bower, S.; Campbell, S. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990, 97, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bilardo, C.M.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Campbell, S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: Relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 162, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khalil, A.; Morales-Rosello, J.; Khan, N.; Nath, M.; Agarwal, P.; Bhide, A.; Papageorghiou, A.; Thilaganathan, B. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 606.e1–606.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meher, S.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Basheer, S.N.; Lees, C. Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: A systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 46, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trudinger, B.J.; Giles, W.B.; Cook, C.M.; Bombardieri, J.; Collins, L. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: Clinical significance. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1985, 92, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haugen, G.; Bollerslev, J.; Henriksen, T. Human umbilical and fetal cerebral blood flow velocity waveforms following maternal glucose loading: A cross-sectional observational study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol Scand. 2016, 95, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gillis, S.; Connors, G.; Potts, P.; Hunse, C.; Richardson, B. The effect of glucose on Doppler flow velocity waveforms and heart rate pattern in the human fetus. Early Hum. Dev. 1992, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yogev, Y.; Ben-Haroush, A.; Chen, R.; Hod, M.; Merril, Z.; Meizner, I. Doppler sonographic characteristics of umbilical and uterine arteries during oral glucose tolerance testing in healthy pregnant women. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2003, 31, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Degani, S. Fetal cerebrovascular circulation: A review of prenatal ultrasound assessment. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2008, 66, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhide, A.; Acharya, G.; Bilardo, C.M.; Brezinka, C.; Cafici, D.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Kalache, K.; Kingdom, J.; Kiserud, T.; Lee, W.; et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: Use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 41, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mari, G. Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics: From the diagnosis of fetal anemia to the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 200, 613.e1–613.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arduini, D.; Rizzo, G. Normal values of Pulsatility Index from fetal vessels: A cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J. Perinat. Med. 1990, 18, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rizzo, G.; Rizzo, L.; Aiello, E.; Allegra, E.; Arduini, D. Modelling umbilical vein blood flow normograms at 14-40 weeks of gestation by quantile regression analysis. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Opheim, G.L.; Zucknick, M.; Henriksen, T.; Haugen, G. A maternal meal affects clinical Doppler parameters in the fetal middle cerebral artery. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Pardo, J.; Orvieto, R.; Rabinerson, D.; Bar, J.; Hod, M.; Kaplan, B. Fetal middle-cerebral and umbilical artery flow assessments after glucose challenge test. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1999, 65, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zahid, S.M.; Opheim, G.L.; Henriksen, T.; Michelsen, T.M.; Haugen, G. Effect of a standardized maternal meal on fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler indices: A single-blinded crossover study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Senoh, D.; Hata, T.; Kitao, M. Effect of maternal hyperglycemia on fetal regional circulation in appropriate for gestational age and small for gestational age fetuses. Am. J. Perinatol. 1995, 12, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ebbing, C.; Rasmussen, S.; Kiserud, T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacentalpulsatility ratio: Longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hüppi, P.S.; Warfield, S.; Kikinis, R.; Barnes, P.D.; Zientara, G.P.; Jolesz, F.A.; Tsuji, M.K.; Volpe, J.J. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and mature newborns. Ann. Neurol. 1998, 43, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du Plessis, A.J. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in the developing fetus. Clin. Perinatol. 2009, 36, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sobrevia, L.; Nadal, A.; Yudilevich, D.L.; Mann, G.E. Activation of L-arginine transport (system y+) and nitric oxide synthase by elevated glucose and insulin in human endothelial cells. J. Physiol. 1996, 490 Pt 3, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Hunter, C.J.; Blood, A.B.; White, C.R.; Pearce, W.J.; Power, G.G. Role of nitric oxide in hypoxic cerebral vasodilatation in the ovine fetus. J. Physiol. 2003, 549 Pt 2, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- González, M.; Rojas, S.; Avila, P.; Cabrera, L.; Villalobos, R.; Palma, C.; Aguayo, C.; Peña, E.; Gallardo, V.; Guzmán-Gutiérrez, E.; et al. Insulin reverses D-glucose-increased nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species generation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Mancusi, G.; Hutter, C.; Baumgartner-Parzer, S.; Schmidt, K.; Schütz, W.; Sexl, V. High-glucose incubation of human umbilical-vein endothelial cells does not alter expression and function either of G-protein alpha-subunits or of endothelial NO synthase. Biochem. J. 1996, 315 Pt 1, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
| Measurement | Intraclass Correlation (ICC) | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | p-Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R UT S/D | 0.970 | 0.944 | 0.985 | <0.001 |
| R UT PI | 0.967 | 0.937 | 0.983 | <0.001 |
| R UT RI | 0.924 | 0.858 | 0.960 | <0.001 |
| L UT S/D | 0.943 | 0.894 | 0.970 | <0.001 |
| L UT PI | 0.944 | 0.895 | 0.971 | <0.001 |
| L UT RI | 0.961 | 0.927 | 0.980 | <0.001 |
| Variable | n | Mean ± SD | Median [Min–Max] | 25th–75th Percentiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 207 | 28.71 ± 5.39 | 28.0 [19–41] | [25.0–32.0] |
| Height (cm) | 209 | 162.09 ± 5.59 | 162.0 [150.0–178.0] | [158.5–166.0] |
| Weight (kg) | 209 | 75.99 ± 13.06 | 74.0 [48.0–116.0] | [67.0–84.5] |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 209 | 28.96 ± 4.99 | 28.20 [19.47–43.66] | [25.23–32.30] |
| Pre-pregnancy weight (kg) | 209 | 68.01 ± 13.28 | 65.0 [40.0–113.0] | [58.5–75.0] |
| Gestational week (LMP) | 202 | 25.43 ± 1.84 | 25.14 [18.71–30.71] | [24.14–26.61] |
| Gestational week (US) | 209 | 25.77 ± 1.98 | 25.43 [19.14–32.14] | [24.50–27.07] |
| Birth weight, 1st delivery (g) | 128 | 3205.63 ± 532.77 | 3200.0 [700–4550] | [2910.0–3590.0] |
| Birth weight, 2nd delivery (g) | 55 | 3319.27 ± 391.78 | 3300.0 [2500–4300] | [3050.0–3600.0] |
| Birth weight, 3rd delivery (g) | 15 | 3490.0 ± 562.58 | 3300.0 [2500–4650] | [3100.0–4000.0] |
| USG/BPD (cm) | 209 | 25.81 ± 2.22 | 25.40 [19.5–32.0] | [24.35–27.30] |
| AC (cm) | 209 | 25.68 ± 1.99 | 25.50 [19.3–32.6] | [24.30–27.05] |
| FL (cm) | 209 | 25.43 ± 2.14 | 25.30 [19.0–31.4] | [24.20–26.55] |
| EFW (g) | 209 | 981.28 ± 686.45 | 877.0 [271–10,002] | [765.5–1101.5] |
| OGTT—0 MIN (mg/dL) | 209 | 82.69 ± 12.19 | 80.00 [55–139] | [75.00–88.00] |
| OGTT—60 MIN (mg/dL) | 208 | 125.19 ± 29.15 | 121.00 [61–265] | [106.00–145.75] |
| Clinical Characteristic | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Systemic disease | |
| Absent | 186 (89.0) |
| Present | 23 (11.0) |
| Smoking | |
| Absent | 181 (86.6) |
| Present | 28 (13.4) |
| Regular drug use | |
| Absent | 194 (92.8) |
| Present | 15 (7.2) |
| Family history of DM | |
| Absent | 146 (69.9) |
| Present | 63 (30.1) |
| Previous pregnancy DM | |
| Absent | 203 (97.6) |
| Present | 5 (2.4) |
| Preeclampsia | |
| Absent | 201 (96.6) |
| Present | 7 (3.4) |
| IUGR | |
| Absent | 197 (94.7) |
| Present | 11 (5.3) |
| Preterm delivery | |
| Absent | 198 (95.2) |
| Present | 10 (4.8) |
| Variables | n | Mean ± SD | p-Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right Uterine Artery PI 1 | 209 | 0.92 ± 0.38 | 0.189 |
| Right Uterine Artery PI 2 | 209 | 0.94 ± 0.40 | |
| Right Uterine PI-Z Score 1 | 208 | −0.17 ± 1.37 | 0.412 |
| Right Uterine PI-Z Score 2 | 208 | −0.10 ± 1.48 | |
| Right Uterine RI 1 | 209 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.437 |
| Right Uterine RI 2 | 209 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | |
| Right Uterine S/D 1 | 209 | 2.35 ± 0.78 | 0.107 |
| Right Uterine S/D 2 | 209 | 2.42 ± 0.95 | |
| Left Uterine Artery PI 1 | 209 | 0.95 ± 0.31 | 0.387 |
| Left Uterine Artery PI 2 | 209 | 0.96 ± 0.35 | |
| Left Uterine PI-Z Score 1 | 208 | 0.08 ± 1.18 | 0.464 |
| Left Uterine PI-Z Score 2 | 208 | 0.11 ± 1.23 | |
| Left Uterine RI 1 | 209 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.566 |
| Left Uterine RI 2 | 209 | 0.56 ± 0.10 | |
| Left Uterine S/D 1 | 209 | 2.40 ± 0.67 | 0.375 |
| Left Uterine S/D 2 | 209 | 2.42 ± 0.75 | |
| Mean Uterine Artery PI 1 | 209 | 0.94 ± 0.28 | 0.200 |
| Mean Uterine Artery PI 2 | 209 | 0.95 ± 0.31 | |
| Mean Uterine PI-Z Score 1 | 209 | −0.05 ± 1.04 | 0.284 |
| Mean Uterine PI-Z Score 2 | 209 | 0.00 ± 1.14 | |
| Mean Uterine RI 1 | 209 | 0.55 ± 0.08 | 0.411 |
| Mean Uterine RI 2 | 209 | 0.55 ± 0.09 | |
| Mean Uterine S/D 1 | 209 | 2.37 ± 0.58 | 0.129 |
| Mean Uterine S/D 2 | 209 | 2.42 ± 0.68 | |
| Umbilical Artery PI 1 | 209 | 1.10 ± 0.17 | 0.901 |
| Umbilical Artery PI 2 | 209 | 1.11 ± 0.18 | |
| Umbilical Artery PI-Z Score 1 | 208 | −0.12 ± 1.06 | 0.947 |
| Umbilical Artery PI-Z Score 2 | 208 | −0.12 ± 1.07 | |
| Umbilical Artery RI 1 | 209 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 0.900 |
| Umbilical Artery RI 2 | 209 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | |
| Umbilical Artery S/D 1 | 209 | 3.26 ± 0.69 | 0.898 |
| Umbilical Artery S/D 2 | 209 | 3.27 ± 0.70 | |
| MCA PI 1 | 209 | 1.86 ± 0.37 | <0.001 |
| MCA PI 2 | 209 | 1.74 ± 0.33 | |
| MCA PI-Z Score 1 | 208 | 0.29 ± 1.25 | <0.001 |
| MCA PI-Z Score 2 | 208 | −0.18 ± 1.30 | |
| MCA RI 1 | 209 | 0.82 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| MCA RI 2 | 209 | 0.81 ± 0.07 | |
| MCA S/D 1 | 209 | 6.77 ± 5.30 | <0.001 |
| MCA S/D 2 | 209 | 5.62 ± 2.46 | |
| CPR 1 | 208 | 1.73 ± 0.44 | 0.004 |
| CPR 2 | 208 | 1.61 ± 0.41 |
| 50 gr Challenge Test | n | Mean | SD | 25th | Percentiles | 75th | p * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right uterine PI | Positive | 62 | −0.0448 | 0.32783 | −0.2325 | −0.0400 | 0.1050 | 0.477 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0031 | 0.29899 | −0.1700 | −0.0100 | 0.1400 | ||
| Right uterine RI | Positive | 62 | −0.0087 | 0.09943 | −0.0625 | −0.0200 | 0.0525 | 0.481 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0020 | 0.09712 | −0.0600 | 0 | 0.0500 | ||
| Right uterine S/D | Positive | 62 | −0.2031 | 0.93840 | −0.4225 | −0.0700 | 0.2025 | 0.320 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0154 | 0.58621 | −0.2900 | −0.0100 | 0.2000 | ||
| Left uterine PI | Positive | 62 | 0.0673 | 0.27043 | −0.1000 | 0 | 0.2125 | 0.014 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0510 | 0.27818 | −0.1700 | −0.0400 | 0.1000 | ||
| Left uterine RI | Positive | 62 | 0.0240 | 0.08921 | −0.0300 | 0.0200 | 0.0825 | 0.013 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0140 | 0.07742 | −0.0600 | −0.0100 | 0.0400 | ||
| Left uterine S/D | Positive | 62 | 0.1881 | 0.72193 | −0.1625 | 0.1050 | 0.3925 | 0.004 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.1201 | 0.62294 | −0.3500 | −0.0600 | 0.2000 | ||
| Umbilical artery PI | Positive | 62 | 0.0155 | 0.18471 | −0.1250 | 0.0100 | 0.1625 | 0.367 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0114 | 0.19055 | −0.1200 | −0.0200 | 0.1200 | ||
| Umbilical artery RI | Positive | 62 | 0.0081 | 0.07310 | 0 | 0 | 0.1000 | 0.377 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0014 | 0.07401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Umbilical artery S/D | Positive | 62 | 0.1653 | 0.80181 | −0.3750 | 0.0450 | 0.6650 | 0.333 |
| Negative | 147 | −0.0024 | 0.74007 | −0.3700 | 0 | 0.4200 |
| Test Result | n | Mean | SD | 25th | Percentiles Median | 75th | p * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right uterine PI | Positive | 7 | 0.0100 | 0.18276 | −0.1400 | 0.0300 | 0.1800 | 0.662 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0186 | 0.29681 | −0.1900 | −0.0250 | 0.1325 | ||
| Right uterine RI | Positive | 7 | 0.0029 | 0.05407 | −0.0300 | −0.0200 | 0.0600 | 0.897 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0054 | 0.09539 | −0.0600 | 0 | 0.0500 | ||
| Right uterine S/D | Positive | 7 | −0.0900 | 0.38850 | −0.3500 | −0.1800 | 0.2200 | 0.791 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0607 | 0.65831 | −0.3100 | −0.0250 | 0.2000 | ||
| Left uterine PI | Positive | 7 | 0.1329 | 0.15934 | −0.0900 | 0.1800 | 0.2500 | 0.042 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0312 | 0.28155 | −0.1700 | −0.0200 | 0.1125 | ||
| Left uterine RI | Positive | 7 | 0.0471 | 0.06576 | −0.0400 | 0.0700 | 0.0900 | 0.048 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0086 | 0.07981 | −0.0600 | −0.0100 | 0.0425 | ||
| Left uterine S/D | Positive | 7 | 0.2729 | 0.37518 | −0.1900 | 0.3900 | 0.4900 | 0.037 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0703 | 0.65948 | −0.3225 | −0.0500 | 0.2225 | ||
| Umbilical artery PI | Positive | 7 | 0.0829 | 0.13413 | −0.0500 | 0.0900 | 0.2400 | 0.176 |
| Negative | 174 | −0.0079 | 0.19181 | −0.1200 | −0.0100 | 0.1200 | ||
| Umbilical artery RI | Positive | 7 | 0.0429 | 0.05345 | 0 | 0 | 0.1000 | 0.135 |
| Negative | 174 | 0.0017 | 0.07486 | 0 | 0 | 0.1000 | ||
| Umbilical artery S/D | Positive | 7 | 0.2243 | 0.47017 | −0.1500 | 0.2200 | 0.7500 | 0.429 |
| Negative | 174 | 0.0200 | 0.74920 | −0.3500 | 0.0100 | 0.4425 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Turan Özsoy, H.G.; Adanaş Aydın, G.; Ünal, S.; Oral, B. Impact of 50 g OGTT-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia on Uteroplacental and Fetoplacental Circulations in Gestational Diabetes Screening: A Prospective Single-Center Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238362
Turan Özsoy HG, Adanaş Aydın G, Ünal S, Oral B. Impact of 50 g OGTT-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia on Uteroplacental and Fetoplacental Circulations in Gestational Diabetes Screening: A Prospective Single-Center Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(23):8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238362
Chicago/Turabian StyleTuran Özsoy, Hilal Gülsüm, Gültekin Adanaş Aydın, Serhat Ünal, and Behiye Oral. 2025. "Impact of 50 g OGTT-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia on Uteroplacental and Fetoplacental Circulations in Gestational Diabetes Screening: A Prospective Single-Center Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 23: 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238362
APA StyleTuran Özsoy, H. G., Adanaş Aydın, G., Ünal, S., & Oral, B. (2025). Impact of 50 g OGTT-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia on Uteroplacental and Fetoplacental Circulations in Gestational Diabetes Screening: A Prospective Single-Center Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238362
