Next Article in Journal
Algorithm-Guided Management of Thumb Amputation: A 20-Year Retrospective Review and Outcome Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
From Mesh to Modern Therapies: An Updated Narrative Review on Urogenital Prolapse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Are Image-Based Deep Learning Algorithms of Kidney Volume in Polycystic Kidney Disease Ready for Clinical Deployment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Emil Colliander
1,†,
Sebastian Tupper
1,†,
Mira Lansner Kielberg
1,
Marie Louise Liu
1,
Enrique Almar-Munoz
2,
Agnes Mayr
2 and
Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
1,3,*
1
Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
2
Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
3
Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 8255; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228255
Submission received: 14 September 2025 / Revised: 10 November 2025 / Accepted: 14 November 2025 / Published: 20 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)

Abstract

Objectives: In patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), total kidney volume (TKV) is the gold standard biomarker for assessing the risk of progression and the need for drug therapy. However, it is a time-consuming process. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the current state of deep learning (DL) algorithms for automatic kidney volume segmentation. Methods: All original research, including the search terms ADPKD, diagnostic imaging, DL, and TKV, was identified in PubMed, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE databases from January 2000 to 13 October 2024. Articles with insufficient information to assess methodological quality were excluded. Quality was assessed using the “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, Version 2” (QUADAS-2) and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) tools. We focused on the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), bias differences, and time efficiency as outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies were included, with an overall low risk of bias; however, the mean adherence to the CLAIM checklist was 64%. The pooled DSC under the random-effects model was 0.953 (95% CI: 0.9380.969) with relatively low bias for TKV in 5622 ADPKD patients (mean age, 46.1 years; 45% male) and 9180 scans (79% MRI). The average segmentation time was decreased by 75% compared to the ground truth. Performance differences were evident among imaging modalities, MRI sequences, and 3D vs. 2D models, but not among imaging planes. The between-study heterogeneity was low (I2=0%), and no statistically significant evidence of small-study effects or publication bias was detected. Conclusions: DL models for TKV in ADPKD patients demonstrated high precision compared to manual segmentation in a large, pooled sample with heterogeneous study designs and methods. While clinical implementation is not yet feasible, the current work demonstrates the technical and diagnostic efficacy of image-based DL segmentation models.
Keywords: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD); total kidney volume (TKV); deep learning; artificial intelligence (AI); diagnostic imaging; CT; MRI; ultrasound; systematic review; meta-analysis autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD); total kidney volume (TKV); deep learning; artificial intelligence (AI); diagnostic imaging; CT; MRI; ultrasound; systematic review; meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Colliander, E.; Tupper, S.; Kielberg, M.L.; Liu, M.L.; Almar-Munoz, E.; Mayr, A.; Mirón Mombiela, R. Are Image-Based Deep Learning Algorithms of Kidney Volume in Polycystic Kidney Disease Ready for Clinical Deployment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228255

AMA Style

Colliander E, Tupper S, Kielberg ML, Liu ML, Almar-Munoz E, Mayr A, Mirón Mombiela R. Are Image-Based Deep Learning Algorithms of Kidney Volume in Polycystic Kidney Disease Ready for Clinical Deployment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(22):8255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Colliander, Emil, Sebastian Tupper, Mira Lansner Kielberg, Marie Louise Liu, Enrique Almar-Munoz, Agnes Mayr, and Rebeca Mirón Mombiela. 2025. "Are Image-Based Deep Learning Algorithms of Kidney Volume in Polycystic Kidney Disease Ready for Clinical Deployment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 22: 8255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228255

APA Style

Colliander, E., Tupper, S., Kielberg, M. L., Liu, M. L., Almar-Munoz, E., Mayr, A., & Mirón Mombiela, R. (2025). Are Image-Based Deep Learning Algorithms of Kidney Volume in Polycystic Kidney Disease Ready for Clinical Deployment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(22), 8255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop