Next Article in Journal
Infective Endocarditis and Excessive Use of B− Blood Type Due to Surgical Treatment—Is It Only a Local Problem? LODZ-ENDO Results (2015–2025)
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Orthodontic Assessment of Mandibular Morphology Using Orthopantomograms: Correlation and Symmetry Analysis of Bilateral Gonial Angles, Bigonial Width, and Bilateral Ramus Heights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meta-Analysis of Ocy-454 Showed Interrupted Osteocyte Maturation in Spaceflight Affects SOST Expression and Hypoxic Response

1
Division of Aerospace Medicine, Department of Cell Physiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
2
Department of Integrated Analytics, M&D Data Science Center, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
3
Department of Genome Biology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 8100; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228100 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 September 2025 / Revised: 7 November 2025 / Accepted: 11 November 2025 / Published: 15 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Changes in sclerostin expression regulated by SOST in osteocytes during spaceflight may be associated with bone loss; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between SOST expression and bone loss by identifying the gene expression differences between osteocytes with high and low SOST expressions. Methods: We used the NASA GeneLab Database OSD-324, which is a microarray of data about the Ocy454 osteocytic cell line cultured for 2, 4, and 6 days during spaceflight, and the GSE102958 microarray in the Gene Expression Omnibus. We also analyzed the characteristics of SOST gene expression in osteocytes during spaceflight using merged datasets. Results: The findings of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that five gene sets related with H3K27me3 significantly upregulated with NES > 2.0 during spaceflight compared with ground controls. We also found 77 and 617 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in flight 6d vs. low and high SOST expression, respectively. We used the transcriptional regulatory relationships unraveled by the sentence-based text-mining (TRRUST) database to determine the most significant upstream transcription factor (TF) of genes downregulated in osteocytes during spaceflight compared with those expressing abundant SOST. We detected that TF Sp7 is the most significant, with FDR < 0.01. Moreover, the GSEA findings indicated that the hypoxic pathway is prolonged in osteocytes during spaceflight compared to those at ground level. Conclusions: The gene expression profiles of osteocytes during spaceflight and in comparatively immature osteocytes with low SOST expression were similar. Furthermore, early osteocyte maturation inhibited by downregulated Sp7 during spaceflight extended the hypoxic response.

1. Introduction

The space environment significantly differs from that of the Earth due to microgravity, radiation, and other factors. Since all life on Earth has adapted to gravity, microgravity induces a great impact on biological processes. For example, microgravity shifts body fluids upwards, which leads to compensatory changes in the cardiovascular system and causes atrophy of the musculoskeletal system that maintains a dynamic remodeling response to mechanical stimuli [1].
The effects of spaceflight on skeletal health present a significant challenge to long-term spaceflight. Bone loss in weight-bearing regions during spaceflight exceeds that among post-menopausal osteoporotic women, and the impact continues even after repatriation [2]. One cause of this is decreased bone formation by osteoblasts and increased resorption by osteoclasts determined by serum markers [3].
Bone consists of osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes. Osteocytes account for 90% of bone cells and consist of fully differentiated osteoblasts that reside in the matrix of mineralized bone. Osteocytes control the responses of osteoclasts and osteoblasts to hormone signaling and mechanical stimuli via unknown mechanisms. However, osteocyte dendrites are considered to sense fluid flow inside the lacuna–canalicular system around osteocytes [4]. Osteocytes coordinate the activity of osteoclasts that comprise a major source of the receptor activator of osteoprotegrin (OPG) and the nuclear factor kappa beta ligand (RANKL) for osteoclastogenesis. Osteoprotegrin is a soluble decoy receptor allowing RANKL to inhibit osteoclast formation. Osteocytes contribute to osteoclast differentiation by secreting macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα). Furthermore, osteocytes are a major source of sclerostin (encoded by the SOST gene), which plays a major role in bone homeostasis, as a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1 (Dkk1) [5].
Osteocytes might release SOST in response to mechanical stimuli and regulate bone homeostasis. The expression of SOST increases in osteocytes during conditions of unloading and simulated microgravity [6,7], decreases under fluid shear stress [8] and loading [6], and mitigates bone loss induced under unloading caused by anti-sclerostin antibodies [9]. These findings indicate that osteocytes express SOST. Furthermore, osteocytes expressing high, rather than low, SOST [10] in response to mechanical stimulation are more differentiated.
Imbalanced bone remodeling during spaceflight might be associated with changes in osteocytes, because they control osteoclast activities. However, changes in SOST expression and sclerostin levels in spaceflight await clarification. On the one hand, increased SOST expression in osteocytes from goldfish scales in space is consistent with the findings in simulated microgravity at ground level [11]. On the other hand, although cranial bone density decreases [12] or does not significantly change during spaceflight [13], SOST increases [13], but serum sclerostin values do not significantly differ after 4-5 months of spaceflight [14]. The relationship between bone loss and SOST expression does not necessarily match findings on the ground from this perspective. In addition, whether SOST expression is altered in long bone osteocytes remains unknown. Thus, changes in SOST/sclerostin in spaceflight require further investigation.
We aimed to clarify whether SOST expression changes in osteocytes during spaceflight. We used OSD-324, which comprises the only experimental microarray information about osteocytes during spaceflight. The data were based on the osteocytic cell line Ocy454 derived from long bone that expressed SOST. Previous PCR findings found that SOST was downregulated in Ocy454 [15]. We combined the OSD-324 data with the GSE102958 microarray dataset that includes information about differences between osteocytes with low and high SOST expression [10]. We then analyzed characteristics of SOST gene expression in Ocy454 during spaceflight.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Download and Preprocessing

We downloaded DNA microarray datasets from the NASA GeneLab Data Repository (https://genelab-data.ndc.nasa.gov/genelab/projects/) (accessed on 17 September 2025) [16,17] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [18]. Specifically, we downloaded tape archive (tar) files in OSD-324 [15] (NASA GeneLab) and in GSE102958 [10] (NCBI GEO database) containing data about the murine osteocytic cell line Ocy454 [7]. The OSD-324 dataset included six spaceflight and ground control samples, each based on the GPL20258-[MTA-1_0] Affymetrix Mouse Transcriptome Array 1.0 [19]. We selected two samples each from the six spaceflight and ground (control) samples that were cultured for 2, 4, and 6 days. Two and three samples of Ocy454 expressing high and low SOST/sclerostin after 7 days of culturation were, respectively, downloaded from the GSE102958 dataset based on the GPL17791 [MoGene-2_0-st] Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array [20].
The probe IDs of the dataset were converted into ENTREZID using mta10transctiptcluster.db [21] for OSD-324 and mogene20sttranscriptcluster.db [22] for GSE102958. We then filtered out NA data and ENTREZID duplicates using an EXCEL function [23] and merged these data using the dplyr version 1.1.3 package in R 4.4.1 [24]. We used RStudio version 2024.09.0.375 [25] for the R consoler.

2.2. Statistical Analysis (Differential Expression Analysis)

All data were statistically analyzed using Local Pooled Error (LPE) in R [26] and p-values were adjusted using the BH procedure, and FDR was calculated with the LPE package [27]. We considered any gene with FDR < 0.01 a differential expression gene.

2.3. Data Visualization

Data were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA), the prcomp function in R [26], and the Matplotlib [28] and Pandas modules [29] in Python 8.27.0 [30].
Chemical and genetic perturbations (CGP) of the curated gene sets in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [31,32,33] were identified using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Enrichment determined using GSEA 4.3.3 software [31,34] was considered significant if the absolute value of the normalized enrichment score (NES) was >2.0. Responses to hypoxia determined by GSEA were extracted using the CGP dataset and visualized using the clusterProfiler 4.12.6 package [35,36] in R. We also analyzed Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [37,38,39] pathway enrichment using clusterProfiler and visualized the findings using the Matplotlib 3.9.2 and Pandas 2.2.2 modules in Python [30].
Volcano plots with fold change (FC) and false discovery rate (FDR) cut-offs of 0.5 and 0.01, respectively, were generated using the Matplotlib and Pandas modules in Python. We also extracted common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Venn diagrams generated using the matplotlib module [28] in Python.
We investigated DEGs using Gene Ontology (GO), the clusterProfiler package in R, and the GO.db 3.19.1 [40] R/Bioconductor package. Values with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) procedure. We included the Biological Process (BP), Cellular Component (CC), and Molecular Function (MF) categories in GO.db, and visualized the data using Matplotlib in the Python Pandas module.
We identified upstream transcription factors among the DEGs using transcriptional regulatory relationships unraveled by sentence-based text-mining (TRRUST) [41]. Values with p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Gene Expression Profiles in Osteocytes Were Comparable After Six Days of Spaceflight and Low SOST Expression

We evaluated the characteristics of samples in the merged dataset using PCA [Figure 1a]. First, the samples obtained from OSD-324 include those cultured for 2, 4, and 6 days in both spaceflight and ground conditions. In addition, the samples obtained from GSE102958 include groups with low and high SOST expression levels after 7 days of culture. Spaceflight (flight) and ground samples as well as those with low and high SOST expression each formed independent clusters. Closer clusters were formed between time points by flight, than ground samples. The ground samples at 2 and 4 days, and the flight samples at 2, 4, and 6 days, each formed independent but close clusters. In contrast, ground samples formed separate clusters with each other or with flight samples at 6 days. Therefore, gene expression profiles differed between flight and ground samples at 6 days.
We investigated perturbed spaceflight-specific gene expression between flight vs. ground using GSEA and the CGP dataset, which provides information about chemical and genetic perturbation [Figure 1b–i]. Among eight significantly enriched genes, five were associated with H3K27ME3 histone modification in the flight and were compared with ground samples. Enhanced histone modification by H3K27ME3 indicated poorly differentiated cells [42] during spaceflight.
We compared the numbers of DEGs and changes in volcano plots to assess the similarity of SOST gene expression between flight 6d and poorly differentiated osteocytes. We detected 77 and 617 DEGs in flight 6d vs. low and high SOST expressions [Tables S1 and S2]. The volcano plots revealed significant differences in gene expression; they revealed that the most significantly different genes were concentrated at the center of flight 6d vs. high SOST expression and others scattered from the center [Figure 1j,k]. In contrast, the volcano plot showed greater fold changes among the genes in ground_6d vs. low, than in the high SOST expression [Figure 1l,m]. This suggested SOST expression was similarly low between flight 6d and ground osteocytes, and intermediate between osteocytes at ground_6d and those with low and high SOST expression.

3.2. Ossification Is Downregulated in Osteocytes After Spaceflight in Contrast to Those with High SOST Expression

Gene expression was similar between flight 6d osteocytes and those with low SOST expression. Therefore, we compared osteocytes at flight 6d to those with low and high SOST expression, using GO [Figure 2a–c]. The GO map of DEGs in flight 6d vs. high SOST expression revealed enriched “ossification”, “Wnt signaling”, “biomineral tissue development”, and “osteoblast differentiation”, and “bone development” pathways [Figure 2a].
A GO map of DEGs downregulated in flight 6d compared to high SOST expression overlapped with “ossification”, “Wnt signaling pathway”, “cell–cell signaling by Wnt”, “biomineral tissue development”, “osteoblast differentiation”, and “bone development” pathways [Figure 2b]. A GO map of DEGs in flight 6d compared to high SOST expression revealed enriched “chemotaxis”,” taxis”, “ameboidal-type cell migration”, “cell–substrate adhesion”, and “cell chemotaxis” pathways associated with cell adhesion [Figure 2c]. These results indicated a significantly downregulated pathway that enhances ossification in flight 6d, compared to high SOST expression.
We analyzed TFs upstream of downregulated DEGs in flight 6d compared to osteocytes with high SOST expression using TRRUST, and detected the bone-specific TFs, Sp7 and Runx2 [Figure 2d]. Furthermore, we extracted common DEGs in flight 2d vs. 6d, ground 6d, and high SOST expression, using a Venn diagram to identify changes in gene expression over time during spaceflight, and detected 120 genes [Figure 2e]. Gene Ontology analysis of these 120 genes revealed enriched ossification pathways in downregulated DEGs in flight 6d vs. high SOST expression [Figure 2f]. Moreover, the most significant upstream TF of these 120 genes detected by TRRUST was Sp7, whereas Runx2 was undetectable [Figure 2g]. These results suggested that disrupted Sp7 expression in spaceflight inhibited Ocy454 maturation, and downregulated SOST expression.

3.3. Hypoxic Pathway in Osteocytes Remained Enriched After Spaceflight Compared to Ground

We speculated that osteocyte maturation is inhibited in spaceflight based on the results of the comparison of osteocytes between flight 6d and those with high SOST expression. Therefore, we compared the temporal changes in flight versus on the ground using GO. The only significant pathway was “cartilage development” in downregulated DEGs in ground samples in flight d2 vs. d4 [Figure 3a]. These findings indicated that gene expression in osteocytes did not significantly change between 2 and 4 days regardless of being on the ground or in flight.
The pathways, “response to hypoxia” and “response to decreased oxygen levels” overlapped with downregulated DEGs in ground samples in 4d vs. 6d. However, these pathways were not enriched in flight [Figure 3a]. These similarly overlapped with downregulated DEGs in ground samples but not in flight 2d vs. 6d [Figure 3a]. This result indicated that the response to hypoxia was inhibited between 4 and 6 days in ground, but not in flight, samples.
We used KEGG enrichment to analyze the prolonged response to hypoxia in spaceflight determined by GO. The results of ground 6d vs. flight 6d revealed that “HIF-1 signaling”, the “pentose phosphate pathway”, and “fructose and mannose metabolism” associated with energy metabolism overlapped the upregulated DEGs in Flight 6d [Figure 3b]. Similarly, in ground 2d vs. 6d, the “HIF-1 signaling pathway” and pathways related to energy metabolism, such as “the pentose phosphate pathway”, “fructose and mannose metabolism”, and “protein digestion and absorption”, overlapped with downregulated DEGs in ground 6d [Figure 3d]. Contrary to these results found in flight 2d vs. 6d, pathways enriched in ground 6d vs. flight 6d and ground 2d vs. 6d were undetectable, whereas “herpes simplex virus 1 infection”, “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction”, and “staphylococcus aureus infection” associated with infection were enriched [Figure 3f].
We applied GSEA to the CGP dataset in flight 6d vs. ground 6d [Figure S1] and found that “GROSS_HYPOXIA_VIA_ELK3_AND_HIF1A_UP”, “GROSS_HYPOXIA_VIA_HIF1A_DN”, and “QI_HYPOXIA” were upregulated in flight 6d with NES > 2.0 [Figure 3c]. These pathways were downregulated in ground 6d vs. 2d with NES < −2.0 [Figure 3e and Figure S2]. In contrast, the NES of these pathways was insignificant in flight 2d vs. 6d [Figure S3 and Figure 3g]. These results indicated that the hypoxic pathway is prolonged in osteocytes after spaceflight compared with those on the ground.

3.4. Osteocytes After Spaceflight Maintain Energy Metabolism Pathway Downstream of Hif1a and Egr1 Compared to Osteocytes with High SOST Expression

We investigated whether the response to hypoxia is prolonged in osteocytes with low SOST expression as it is in flight 6d by analyzing DEGs using GO. All DEGs between ground 6d and low SOST overlapped with pathways associated with “response to hypoxia” and “response to oxygen levels” [Figure 4a]. The upregulated DEGs in low SOST expression vs. ground 6d overlapped with “response to hypoxia” and “cellular response to hypoxia” pathways [Figure 4b]. In contrast, significant pathways were not associated with downregulated DEGs in osteocytes with low SOST expression. These results indicated that the gene profile of “response to hypoxia” was prolonged in osteocytes on flight 6d and in those with low SOST expression.
We suggested above that the response to hypoxia is maintained in osteocytes during spaceflight, but downregulated in ground controls. We then considered whether the prolonged response to hypoxia and SOST expression is abnormal and specific to spaceflight. Therefore, we used Venn diagrams to extract common genes from DEGs that were upregulated in flight 6d vs. ground 6d and vs. high SOST expression, and downregulated in ground 2d vs. 6d. We found 55 responsive DEGs in flight 6d vs. high SOST expression [Figure 4c].
Gene Ontology analysis of the 55 responsive DEGs and pathways associated with energy metabolism revealed that “generation of precursor metabolites and energy”, “carbohydrate catabolic process”, and “glucose metabolic process” overlapped [Figure 4d]. Furthermore, TRRUST detected the upstream Hif1a and Egr1 transcription factors of these 55 genes involved in “responses to hypoxia” [Figure 4e]. These findings indicated that spaceflight conditions enhance energy metabolism via signaling pathways downstream of Hif1a and Egr1 that are associated with “response to hypoxia” in Ocy454 osteocytes.

4. Discussion

We found a similar gene expression between osteocytes after spaceflight and those with low SOST expression on the ground. The expression of a gene set induced by H3K27 trimethylation was increased, that of genes downstream of Sp7 was decreased, and pathways downstream of HIF-1a were increased compared to ground controls. The expression of HIF-1a decreased over time on the ground, but remained elevated during spaceflight. Consequently, the expression of genes associated with energy metabolism was enhanced. This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis to examine the effects of spaceflight on osteocyte gene expression with a focus on SOST.
The increase in the level of trimethylation of H3K27(H3K27me3) in osteocytes during spaceflight is considered to be related to a low osteocyte differentiation status according to former research. Expression of the H3K27me2/3 demethylase, ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat, X chromosome (Utx) is induced during osteocyte differentiation [43]. Excessive H3K27me3 prevents Msx-2 and Dlx-5 from approaching binding sites on the promoter regions of Runx2 and Sp7, which become downregulated [42]. This is consistent with the reduced expression of Sp7 downstream genes in osteocytes after spaceflight [Figure 2d]. Notably, SOST is downstream of Sp7, which is the only TF that controls endogenous sclerostin secretion.
The Sp7 TF is key to osteocyte differentiation and dendrite formation. The dendrite population is reduced in osteocytes that do not express Sp7 [44]. Although changes in dendrites during spaceflight have not been determined, osteocytes in suspension cultures have fewer dendrites [45]. Furthermore, Ocy454 cells acquired an early osteolytic expression profile within ~7 days of enculturation. The enculturation of OSD-324 and Ocy454 began five days before and two days after launch, respectively [15]. Therefore, the idea that spaceflight suppressed the formation of dendrites in early osteocytes is reasonable. Osteocytes in a hypoxic environment use dendrites to preserve metabolic capacity [46]. Thus, fewer dendrites induce an enhanced hypoxic response. This is consistent with our finding that the response to hypoxia remained elevated and enhanced energy metabolism. Taken together, whereas osteocytes on the ground continuously developed dendrites throughout culture, Sp7-mediated dendrite growth during spaceflight was inhibited. This prevented osteocytes from maintaining metabolism and resulted in a prolonged hypoxic response.
This study has several limitations. It should be noted that this study only examined overall trends in gene expression and did not include in vivo experiments using knockout mice or in vitro experiments using siRNA. The expression of SOST is also affected by induced random vibrations and lower CO2 levels. Such factors might impact SOST expression during spaceflight enculturation although it was decreased in the present study. We could not confirm whether H3K27me3 is enhanced in spaceflight because CHIP-seq was not available. We could not examine the morphology of osteocytes, which prevented us from confirming the numbers of dendrites in osteocytes during spaceflight. Morphological changes in osteocytes during spaceflight remain unknown and await further investigation. We combined data from OSD-324 osteocytes pre-cultured for 7 days followed by 2–6 days, and GSE102958 cultured for 7 days. Because these datasets included only two or three samples per condition, caution is warranted when generalizing our results. Nonetheless, we identified similar gene profiles between osteocytes in flight 6d and those with low SOST expression, downregulated genes downstream of Sp7, and a prolonged hypoxic response in osteocytes during spaceflight.
In this study, our findings suggest that the decrease in bone density under microgravity may be attributed not only to the regulation of osteoclast and osteoblast activity by secreted factors such as SOST, but also to the maturation process of osteocytes themselves. Furthermore, H3K27me3 and Sp7 may play important roles in this osteocyte maturation. Therefore, future studies should focus not only on osteocyte secretion but also on the maturation of osteocytes regulated by factors such as H3K27me3 and Sp7. This will be key to developing effective strategies for preventing bone loss during spaceflight and disuse syndrome on Earth.
From a clinical perspective, the molecular pathways identified in this study may also explain the bone fragility observed in patients with prolonged immobilization, paralysis, or age-related osteoporosis. Monitoring circulating biomarkers that reflect osteocyte maturation status—such as sclerostin or osteocyte-derived microRNAs—could provide a minimally invasive approach for assessing bone quality in these populations. Moreover, therapeutic interventions targeting the epigenetic regulation of osteocyte maturation (e.g., the modulation of H3K27me3) or combining such strategies with mechanical loading–based rehabilitation may help preserve bone strength both in space travelers and bedridden patients on Earth. Thus, insights from spaceflight research offer a promising translational framework for improving skeletal health in clinical settings.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we showed that spaceflight inhibits early osteocyte maturation by decreasing the expression of Sp7 downstream genes. This results in decreased SOST expression and an extended hypoxic response. These findings basically indicate that early osteocyte maturation is responsible for the decreased bone density caused by spaceflight. Furthermore, H3K27me3 and Sp7 play key roles in early osteocyte maturation and might serve as therapeutic targets for preventing bone loss during long-term human spaceflight. Changes in osteocyte morphology including dendrites during spaceflight require further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm14228100/s1, Table S1: DEGs in flight 6d vs. low SOST; Table S2: DEGs in flight 6d vs. high SOST; Figure S1: Significant GSEA result using CGP dataset of Flight 6d vs. Ground 6d (NES > 2.0); Figure S2: Significant GSEA result using CGP dataset of Ground 6d vs. Ground 2d (NES > 2.0); Figure S3: Significant GSEA result using CGP dataset of Flight 6d vs. Flight 2d (NES > 2.0).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H. and H.B.; methodology, M.H. and H.B.; software, M.H.; validation, T.H., M.M. and H.B.; formal analysis, M.H. and H.B.; investigation, M.H. and H.B.; resources, H.B.; data curation, M.H. and H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H. and H.B.; writing—review and editing, M.H., T.H., M.M. and H.B.; visualization, M.H.; supervision, H.B.; project administration, H.B.; funding acquisition, H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant, No. 20K11539 and 24K14779 (to Bochimoto H).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and are fully available without restriction.

Acknowledgments

We thank the laboratory staff and colleagues for helpful suggestions and technical assistance. We greatly appreciate the helpful discussions with flight surgeons at the Astronaut Medical Operations Group, JAXA. We are grateful to Norma Foster (North Vancouver, BC, Canada) for English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
OPGOsteoprotegrin
RANKLNuclear factor kappa beta ligand
M-CSFMacrophage colony-stimulating factor
IL-6Interleukin 6
TNFαTumor necrosis factor-alpha
Dkk1Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration
GEOGene Expression Omnibus
LPELocal Pooled Error
BHBenjamini–Hochberg
PCAPrincipal component analysis
CGPChemical and genetic perturbations
MSigDBMolecular Signatures Database
GSEAGene Set Enrichment Analysis
NESNormalized enrichment score
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
FCFold change
FDRFalse discovery rate
DEGsDifferentially expressed genes
GOGene Ontology
BPBiological Process
CCCellular Component
MFMolecular Function
TRRUSTTranscriptional regulatory relationships unraveled by sentence-based text-mining
H3K27me3The trimethylation of H3K27
UtxX chromosome

References

  1. Afshinnekoo, E.; Scott, R.T.; MacKay, M.J.; Pariset, E.; Cekanaviciute, E.; Barker, R.; Gilroy, S.; Hassane, D.; Smith, S.M.; Zwart, S.R.; et al. Fundamental Biological Features of Spaceflight: Advancing the Field to Enable Deep-Space Exploration. Cell 2020, 183, 1162–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Coulombe, J.C.; Senwar, B.; Ferguson, V.L. Spaceflight-Induced Bone Tissue Changes that Affect Bone Quality and Increase Fracture Risk. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2020, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vico, L.; Hargens, A. Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018, 14, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, X.; Kordsmeier, J.; Xiong, J. New Advances in Osteocyte Mechanotransduction. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2021, 19, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Robling, A.G.; Bonewald, L.F. The Osteocyte: New Insights. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020, 82, 485–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Robling, A.G.; Niziolek, P.J.; Baldridge, L.A.; Condon, K.W.; Allen, M.R.; Alam, I.; Mantila, S.M.; Gluhak-Heinrich, J.; Bellido, T.M.; Harris, S.E.; et al. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 5866–5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Spatz, J.M.; Wein, M.N.; Gooi, J.H.; Qu, Y.; Garr, J.L.; Liu, S.; Barry, K.J.; Uda, Y.; Lai, F.; Dedic, C.; et al. The Wnt Inhibitor Sclerostin Is Up-regulated by Mechanical Unloading in Osteocytes in Vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 16744–16758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, Z.; Wang, P.; Wu, J.; Feng, X.; Cai, J.; Zhai, M.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Jiang, M.; Luo, E.; et al. Fluid shear stress improves morphology, cytoskeleton architecture, viability, and regulates cytokine expression in a time-dependent manner in MLO-Y4 cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2018, 42, 1410–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spatz, J.M.; Ellman, R.; Cloutier, A.M.; Louis, L.; van Vliet, M.; Suva, L.J.; Dwyer, D.; Stolina, M.; Ke, H.Z.; Bouxsein, M.L. Sclerostin antibody inhibits skeletal deterioration due to reduced mechanical loading. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013, 28, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, C.; Uda, Y.; Dedic, C.; Azab, E.; Sun, N.; Hussein, A.I.; Petty, C.A.; Fulzele, K.; Mitterberger-Vogt, M.C.; Zwerschke, W.; et al. Carbonic anhydrase III protects osteocytes from oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yamamoto, T.; Ikegame, M.; Hirayama, J.; Kitamura, K.-I.; Tabuchi, Y.; Furusawa, Y.; Sekiguchi, T.; Endo, M.; Mishima, H.; Seki, A.; et al. Expression of sclerostin in the regenerating scales of goldfish and its increase under microgravity during space flight. Biomed. Res. 2020, 41, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, B.; Cory, E.; Bhattacharya, R.; Sah, R.; Hargens, A.R. Fifteen days of microgravity causes growth in calvaria of mice. Bone 2013, 56, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Macaulay, T.R.; Siamwala, J.H.; Hargens, A.R.; Macias, B.R. Thirty days of spaceflight does not alter murine calvariae structure despite increased Sost expression. Bone Rep. 2017, 7, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vico, L.; Van Rietbergen, B.; Vilayphiou, N.; Linossier, M.T.; Locrelle, H.; Normand, M.; Zouch, M.; Gerbaix, M.; Bonnet, N.; Novikov, V.; et al. Cortical and Trabecular Bone Microstructure Did Not Recover at Weight-Bearing Skeletal Sites and Progressively Deteriorated at Non-Weight-Bearing Sites During the Year Following International Space Station Missions. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017, 32, 2010–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Uda, Y.; Spatz, J.M.; Hussein, A.; Garcia, J.H.; Lai, F.; Dedic, C.; Fulzele, K.; Dougherty, S.; Eberle, M.; Adamson, C.; et al. Global transcriptomic analysis of a murine osteocytic cell line subjected to spaceflight. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ray, S.; Gebre, S.; Fogle, H.; Berrios, D.C.; Tran, P.B.; Galazka, J.M.; Costes, S.V. GeneLab: Omics database for spaceflight experiments. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1753–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berrios, D.C.; Galazka, J.; Grigorev, K.; Gebre, S.; Costes, S.V. NASA GeneLab: Interfaces for the exploration of space omics data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1515–D1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; Holko, M.; et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets—Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D991–D995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Affymetrix. [MTA-1_0] Affymetrix Mouse Transcriptome Array 1.0 [Transcript (Gene) CDF Version]. 2018. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GPL20258 (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  20. Affymetrix. [MoGene-2_0-st] Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array [mogene20st_Mm_ENTREZG_17.1.0]. 2015. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GPL17791 (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  21. MacDonald, J. mta10transcriptcluster.db: Affymetrix mta10 Annotation Data (Chip mta10transcriptcluster), R Package Version 8.7.0; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. MacDonald, J. mogene20sttranscriptcluster.db: Affymetrix mogene20 Annotation Data (Chip mogene20sttranscriptcluster), R Package Version 8.7.0; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. 2018. Available online: https://office.microsoft.com/excel (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  24. Wickham, H.; François, R.; Henry, L.; Müller, K.; Vaughan, D.; dplyr:A Grammar of Data Manipulation_. R Package Version 1.1.3. 2023. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  25. Posit Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. 2024. Available online: https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/ (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  26. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2024. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/mirrors.html (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  27. Jain, N.; O’Connell, M.; Lee, J.K.; Cho, H. LPE: Methods for Analyzing Microarray Data Using Local Pooled Error (LPE) Method. 2024. Available online: https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.LPE (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  28. Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Team, T. Pandas Development. Pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. 2020. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134 (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  30. Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, Version 3.12.5. 2023. Available online: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/index.html (accessed on 17 September 2025).
  31. Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S.; et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liberzon, A.; Birger, C.; Thorvaldsdóttir, H.; Ghandi, M.; Mesirov, J.P.; Tamayo, P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) Hallmark Gene Set Collection. Cell Syst. 2015, 1, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castanza, A.S.; Recla, J.M.; Eby, D.; Thorvaldsdóttir, H.; Bult, C.J.; Mesirov, J.P. Extending support for mouse data in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). Nat. Methods 2023, 20, 1619–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mootha, V.K.; Lindgren, C.M.; Eriksson, K.-F.; Subramanian, A.; Sihag, S.; Lehar, J.; Puigserver, P.; Carlsson, E.; Ridderstråle, M.; Laurila, E.; et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, G.; Wang, L.-G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wu, T.; Hu, E.; Xu, S.; Chen, M.; Guo, P.; Dai, Z.; Feng, T.; Zhou, L.; Tang, W.; Zhan, L.; et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2021, 2, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019, 28, 1947–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carlson, M. GO.db: A set of Annotation Maps Describing the Entire Gene Ontology; R Package Version 3.8.2.; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. Han, H.; Cho, J.-W.; Lee, S.; Yun, A.; Kim, H.; Bae, D.; Yang, S.; Kim, C.Y.; Lee, M.; Kim, E.; et al. TRRUST v2: An expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D380–D386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, D.; Yu, B.; Sun, H.; Qiu, L. The Roles of Histone Demethylase Jmjd3 in Osteoblast Differentiation and Apoptosis. J. Clin. Med. 2017, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, Y.; Ikedo, A.; Lee, J.-W.; Iimura, T.; Inoue, K.; Imai, Y. Histone H3K27 demethylase, Utx, regulates osteoblast-to-osteocyte differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 590, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, J.S.; Kamath, T.; Mazur, C.M.; Mirzamohammadi, F.; Rotter, D.; Hojo, H.; Castro, C.D.; Tokavanich, N.; Patel, R.; Govea, N.; et al. Control of osteocyte dendrite formation by Sp7 and its target gene osteocrin. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fournier, R.; Harrison, R.E. Methods for studying MLO-Y4 osteocytes in collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds in the rotary cell culture system. Connect. Tissue Res. 2021, 62, 436–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.S.; Wein, M.N. Pathways Controlling Formation and Maintenance of the Osteocyte Dendrite Network. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2022, 20, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) General characteristics of samples determined using PCA. PC1 and 2 are principal components 1 and 2, respectively. (bi) Significant GSEA findings using CGP dataset of flight vs. ground (NES > 2.0). (jm). Volcano plots of (j) flight 6d vs. low SOST, (k) flight 6d vs. high SOST, (l) ground 6d vs. low SOST, and (m) ground 6d with high SOST. Fold change cutoff: 0.5. FDR cutoff: 0.01 for all. Flight 2d, 4d, and 6d: spaceflight for 2, 4, and 6 days. Ground 2d, 4d, and 6d: ground level for 2, 4, and 6 days.
Figure 1. (a) General characteristics of samples determined using PCA. PC1 and 2 are principal components 1 and 2, respectively. (bi) Significant GSEA findings using CGP dataset of flight vs. ground (NES > 2.0). (jm). Volcano plots of (j) flight 6d vs. low SOST, (k) flight 6d vs. high SOST, (l) ground 6d vs. low SOST, and (m) ground 6d with high SOST. Fold change cutoff: 0.5. FDR cutoff: 0.01 for all. Flight 2d, 4d, and 6d: spaceflight for 2, 4, and 6 days. Ground 2d, 4d, and 6d: ground level for 2, 4, and 6 days.
Jcm 14 08100 g001aJcm 14 08100 g001b
Figure 2. Gene Ontology analyses of DEGs between flight 6d and high SOST (a) vs. total, (b) * upregulated, and (c) † downregulated DEGs. (d) Transcription factor upstream of DEGs is downregulated in Flight 6d compared to high SOST detected by TRRUST (FDR < 0.01). (e) Venn diagram of total DEGs in flight 6d vs. 2d, flight 6d vs. ground 6d, and flight 6d vs. high SOST. (f) Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs extracted by Venn diagram (e). (g) Transcription factor upstream of genes extracted by Venn diagram in Figure 2e detected by TRRUST (FDR < 0.01). TF: transcription factor. #: number.
Figure 2. Gene Ontology analyses of DEGs between flight 6d and high SOST (a) vs. total, (b) * upregulated, and (c) † downregulated DEGs. (d) Transcription factor upstream of DEGs is downregulated in Flight 6d compared to high SOST detected by TRRUST (FDR < 0.01). (e) Venn diagram of total DEGs in flight 6d vs. 2d, flight 6d vs. ground 6d, and flight 6d vs. high SOST. (f) Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs extracted by Venn diagram (e). (g) Transcription factor upstream of genes extracted by Venn diagram in Figure 2e detected by TRRUST (FDR < 0.01). TF: transcription factor. #: number.
Jcm 14 08100 g002
Figure 3. (a). Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs between timepoints vs. total, * upregulated, and † downregulated DEGs. Bar plot of top ten significant KEGG pathways of total DEGs in (b) flight 6d vs. ground 6d, (d) ground 6d vs. 6d, and (f) flight 6d vs. 2d. GSEA results of hypoxic pathways of total DEGs using CGP dataset for (c) flight 6d vs. ground 6d, (e) ground 2d vs. 6d, and (g) flight 6d vs. 2d.
Figure 3. (a). Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs between timepoints vs. total, * upregulated, and † downregulated DEGs. Bar plot of top ten significant KEGG pathways of total DEGs in (b) flight 6d vs. ground 6d, (d) ground 6d vs. 6d, and (f) flight 6d vs. 2d. GSEA results of hypoxic pathways of total DEGs using CGP dataset for (c) flight 6d vs. ground 6d, (e) ground 2d vs. 6d, and (g) flight 6d vs. 2d.
Jcm 14 08100 g003aJcm 14 08100 g003b
Figure 4. (a,b) GO analysis of total (a) and upregulated (b) DEGs in ground 6d vs. low SOST. (c) Venn diagram of DEGs upregulated in flight 6d vs. ground 6d (flight 6d vs. ground 6d *), and flight_6d vs. high SOST (flight_6d vs. high SOST †), and DEGs downregulated in ground 6d compared to ground 2d (showed as ground 6d vs. ground 2d †). (d) GO analysis of extracted 55 genes in Figure 4c Venn diagram (e). Transcription factor upstream of genes extracted by Venn diagram in Figure 4d detected by TRRUST (Key TF: Gene Symbol for Transcription factor, #: number) (FDR < 0.01).
Figure 4. (a,b) GO analysis of total (a) and upregulated (b) DEGs in ground 6d vs. low SOST. (c) Venn diagram of DEGs upregulated in flight 6d vs. ground 6d (flight 6d vs. ground 6d *), and flight_6d vs. high SOST (flight_6d vs. high SOST †), and DEGs downregulated in ground 6d compared to ground 2d (showed as ground 6d vs. ground 2d †). (d) GO analysis of extracted 55 genes in Figure 4c Venn diagram (e). Transcription factor upstream of genes extracted by Venn diagram in Figure 4d detected by TRRUST (Key TF: Gene Symbol for Transcription factor, #: number) (FDR < 0.01).
Jcm 14 08100 g004aJcm 14 08100 g004b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Honjo, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Muratani, M.; Bochimoto, H. Meta-Analysis of Ocy-454 Showed Interrupted Osteocyte Maturation in Spaceflight Affects SOST Expression and Hypoxic Response. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228100

AMA Style

Honjo M, Hasegawa T, Muratani M, Bochimoto H. Meta-Analysis of Ocy-454 Showed Interrupted Osteocyte Maturation in Spaceflight Affects SOST Expression and Hypoxic Response. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(22):8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Honjo, Mayuka, Takanori Hasegawa, Masafumi Muratani, and Hiroki Bochimoto. 2025. "Meta-Analysis of Ocy-454 Showed Interrupted Osteocyte Maturation in Spaceflight Affects SOST Expression and Hypoxic Response" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 22: 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228100

APA Style

Honjo, M., Hasegawa, T., Muratani, M., & Bochimoto, H. (2025). Meta-Analysis of Ocy-454 Showed Interrupted Osteocyte Maturation in Spaceflight Affects SOST Expression and Hypoxic Response. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(22), 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop