Next Article in Journal
Real-World Effectiveness of Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Pooled Analysis from the Prospective UMBRELLA-IBD Registry in Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Conservative Management of Severe Scoliosis in a Girl with Prader–Willi Syndrome: A 20-Year Case Study Follow-Up
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Understanding Long-Term Survival in ALS: A Cohort Study on Subject Characteristics and Prognostic Factors

1
Research Center for ALS, Laboratory of Neurological Disorders, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milan, Italy
2
Need Institute, Foundation for the Cure and Rehabilitation of Neurological Diseases, 20121 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
4
NeMO-Brescia Clinical Center for Neuromuscular Diseases, 25064 Brescia, Italy
5
Unit of Neurology, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
6
Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
7
Neurology Unit Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
8
Neuromuscular Omnicentre (NEMO), Fondazione Serena Onlus, 20162 Milan, Italy
9
Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149 Milan, Italy
10
Neuroncology/Neuroinflammation Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
11
Neurology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
12
Neurology Unit, Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7351; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207351
Submission received: 11 September 2025 / Revised: 13 October 2025 / Accepted: 14 October 2025 / Published: 17 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)

Abstract

Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease with variable clinical progression. While median survival is 2–4 years, 5–15% of individuals survive for longer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study using a population-based ALS register in Lombardy, Italy, to identify the clinical characteristics of long-term ALS survivors (≥10 years). Incident cases included in two periods (1998–2002 and 2008–2012) were considered. Results: A total of 828 ALS cases were included. Median survival for the entire cohort was 2.2 years (IQR 1.1–4.4). However, long-term survival was observed in 7% of individuals at 10 years, and 3% at 15 years. Long-survivors had a median survival of 13.4 years, significantly longer than the 1.9 years of non-long-survivors (IQR 1.0–3.6). Long-survivors were younger at disease onset and diagnosis, had longer diagnostic delay, and were more likely to have had a spinal onset. The cohort also showed a higher proportion of males among long-term survivors (75% vs. 59%). No significant difference in survival was observed between the two examined periods. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that long-term ALS survival is likely influenced by a complex interplay of clinical, genetic, and environmental factors, along with the intrinsic rate of motor neuron degeneration.

1. Introduction

A reliable prognostication of clinical course and survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) seems uncertain, yet the disease is invariably deemed fatal, with median survival of 2–4 years [1,2,3]. The variability in clinical progression is traditionally thought to be related to the phenotypic heterogeneity of ALS, this being regarded as a possible predictor of longer survival, for example, in ALS with predominant upper motor neuron involvement [4,5]. Nowadays the increasing resources provided by genetic analysis are disentangling to some extent the issue, because a growing number of genes are characteristically related to slow- or fast-progressing disease, both in familial and sporadic ALS [6,7]. On the other hand, epidemiologic data provided by population-based registries are consistent with an estimate of 5–15% long-surviving ALS subjects [8], with some clinical features being recognized as good predictors of long survival: for example, spinal onset, young age of onset, and a long diagnostic delay [9,10]. Of note, there is no full agreement on the definition of long survival: in some instances, this is more than 5 years [11]; in others, it is more than 10 years.
Our aim is to investigate the clinical features of individuals with ALS who survived for 10 years or more and who were enrolled in a large population-based register of ALS patients established in Lombardy, Italy. Two five-year periods were taken into consideration, 1998–2002 and 2008–2012, in order to explore and describe clinical courses and main predictors distinguishing long-survivors from the general ALS population, and to identify possible differences over time, if any.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

SLALOM (SLA LOMbardia) is a population-based register of ALS patients resident in the Lombardy region of Italy, an area of about 10 million inhabitants. SLALOM was established at the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan in 1997. Briefly, a widespread network of local neurologists and neurophysiologists enroll every subject identified as a definite, probable, probable laboratory-supported, or possible case of ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria. Diagnoses are refined (confirmed, changed, or rejected) during follow-up through on-site visits and detailed reviews of clinical records. Suspected ALS cases are accepted only if clinical progression is verified; such cases are subsequently allocated into a higher degree of diagnostic certainty.
Survival was calculated from date of diagnosis until date of death or of last follow-up (30 June 2024). If known, date of death was recorded by local investigators. If date of death was missing, an inquiry was sent to the municipal registry office of residency. We defined long-survivors as those surviving 10 years or more. The whole process was managed according to the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), after approval by local ethical committees.

2.2. Statistical Methods

Descriptive statistics were obtained for the entire sample, and long-survivors were compared with non-long-survivors. Continuous variables were reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) or range, categorical variables as count and percentage. Comparisons of long-survivors with non-long-survivors were carried out with the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test for continuous variables; for categorical variables, the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used. Survival was described for the entire sample and separately for long-survivors and non-long-survivors with Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The significance level was set at 0.05, and tests were two-tailed. Analyses were performed with the SAS statistical package (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

The total number of incident ALS cases included in the analyses was 828, with 401 recruited for the period 1998–2002 and 427 for 2008–2012. Data on demographics, clinical features at diagnosis, and survival periods were all fully available, whereas data on main clinical milestones (tube feeding, mechanical ventilation) were not available in some cases (Table 1). The proportion of females/males was 45%/55%. The median age of onset was 65 years (IQR 57–72), the median age at diagnosis was 66 years (IQR 58–73), and the median diagnostic delay was 9 months (IQR 5–13). Data on other clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. Definite, probable, and possible ALS accounted for 84.7% of cases. All the 127 subjects categorized as suspected ALS category at diagnosis were followed; in these cases, diagnosis was confirmed during follow-up.
The median estimated survival for the entire sample was 2.2 years (IQR 1.1–4.4). The cumulative survival probability was 21% at 5 years, 7% at 10 years, 3% at 15 years, and 2% at 20 years (Figure 1B).
The number of ALS subjects who survived 10 years or longer after diagnosis (long-survivors) was 61 (7%). No significant differences were identified between the two periods (1998–2002 vs. 2008–2012) (Table 1). The clinical features of the groups of individuals who survived <10 years and ≥10 years are shown in Table 1. Long-survivors were younger at both disease-onset and diagnosis, and their diagnostic delay was three months longer. Among long-survivors, 13 subjects were diagnosed as having suspected ALS according to El Escorial criteria; however, all of these individuals were subsequently categorized as having definite, possible, or probable ALS during follow-up. Long-survivors more frequently had had a spinal onset (75% vs. 59% in non-long-survivors), and a higher proportion of them were males (74% vs. 54% of non-long-survivors). Riluzole was started within one month of diagnosis in 75% of cases where data were available. The proportions of subjects with tube-feeding or non-invasive ventilation and of those treated with riluzole were not significantly different in long-survivors vs. non-long-survivors. Median survival in long-survivors was 13.4 years (12.0-not estimable), whereas it was 1.9 years (IQR 1.0–3.6) in non-long-survivors. Cumulative survival probability in long-survivors vs. non-long-survivors is shown in Figure 1A.
Among 61 long-survivors, information about tracheostomy was not available for 17 subjects. Among the other 44, tracheostomy was performed on 11 individuals, all of whom were males. The site of disease onset was spinal in nine subjects and bulbar in two. The median time of performing the procedure was 7.5 years after diagnosis. The main characteristics of the 11 long-survivors on whom tracheostomy was performed are described in Table 2. Information about genetic testing was available for 26 subjects (Table 3). Among these, 12 underwent genetic testing, and a TDP-43 mutation was identified in one subject.

4. Discussion

Prognosis of ALS and the rate of progression of the disease both encompass a noticeable variability. Population-based registers indicate that only a small proportion of ALS individuals, an estimated 5–15% of the general ALS population, are long-surviving [8,12]. Herein we describe the main clinical features of subjects who were enrolled in a population register of ALS and who survived 10 years or longer. Our study aim was to highlight predictors of long-term survival over time. Median survival in our sample was 2.2 years: 13.4 years in long-survivors and 1.9 years in non-long-survivors. The proportion of ALS long-survivors in the entire sample was 7%. Previous studies report approximately 5% to 10% of ALS patients surviving 8 years or more [6,8]. No significant difference was observed between the two examined periods, with proportions of long-survivors being, respectively, 7% and 8%. It is likely that the improvement in ALS prognosis observed in recent years [13] has not affected survival in long-survivors, but has had an effect on non-long-survivors. Improvement in the multidisciplinary supportive care provided by tertiary centers in recent years may explain this. Due to the lack of collected data on supportive care, any inference regarding its beneficial impact on patient survival remains highly speculative. In partial agreement with our own previous observations [3] and the findings of other studies [12,14,15], we found four predictors of long-term survival: lower age at onset, longer diagnostic delay, male gender, and spinal onset (see Supplementary Table S1). The median age of onset was significantly lower in long-survivors, in line with previous studies which assumed old age as a risk factor for shorter survival [9,12,14]. In our study, the diagnostic delay in long-survivors was 12 months, significantly longer than that of non-long-survivors (9 months). Males and subjects with spinal onset were more prevalent among long-survivors, probably due to overrepresentation of bulbar onset, which is associated with shorter survival [9,10,12,14] in females.
Fewer than half of subjects alive after 10 years underwent measures possibly affecting survival such as percutaneous gastrostomy, non-invasive ventilation, or tracheostomy. With regard to the remaining cases, the possibility of a slow progression of the disease must be taken into account.
A correlation between the use of riluzole and survival was not evaluated because these data were only available for 51% of sample subjects. In addition, 75% of subjects started treatment with riluzole within 1 month of the date of ALS diagnosis, and only a minority of cases reported having stopped the treatment during follow-up. In consequence, it was not feasible to evaluate whether riluzole prolonged survival in the last clinical stage of ALS [16]. The possibility of misdiagnosis cannot be completely excluded; however, all our subjects were followed by expert neurologists, and we included in this survey only suspected ALS cases who had a subsequent re-evaluation congruous with definite, possible, or probable ALS.
This study has some strengths. First of all, as a population-based study, it could provide a real-world picture of clinical course and survival of the disease. Moreover, follow-up was prolonged, with repeated visits by neurologists and thorough investigations to re-assess diagnoses that were confirmed across the entire sample. Collecting all incident ALS cases in two periods, a decade apart, could have allowed for the detection of differences in survival over time.
Nevertheless, our survey has some limitations. Unfortunately, the dates of the main clinical milestones (tube feeding, mechanical ventilation) for examined ALS individuals were not available in some cases, so these could not be related to clinical progression and survival. Most importantly, the presence/absence of tracheostomy was unknown in a proportion of long-survivors; for this reason, it was not possible to evaluate tracheostomy-free survival. Genetic testing was performed in only a very small proportion of subjects, probably only those who were admitted to ALS referral centers; consequently, no association with survival could be evaluated.
In conclusion, it is likely that long-term ALS survival results from a complex interplay of clinical factors, genetic variations, and the intrinsic rate of motor neuron degeneration. The observation of cases exhibiting prolonged survival independent of respiratory and nutritional support suggests the existence of unknown genetic and environmental modifiers. Targeted research into such long-survivors offers a promising avenue for unravelling the biological basis of slow ALS progression. In addition, a more reliable prognostication of ALS could favorably influence ALS care and economic resource allocation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm14207351/s1, Table S1: Comparing predictors of long survival among studies. References [3,12,14,15] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

E.P. carried out study conceptualization, wrote the final protocol, managed the overall research enterprise; wrote the first draft of the manuscript, reviewed the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and managed the estimation and publication processes. E.B. carried out data cleaning; designed and coded figures and tables, and performed the data analyses. M.C. (Massimo Corbo), M.F., A.P., B.R., V.d., M.V., F.C., C.M., L.D., M.C. (Mauro Ceroni), Y.F., and A.R. provided critical feedback on results, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and performed subject enrolment and data collection. E.V. and M.A.L. carried out study conceptualization, performed the clinical evaluation on study conduction, provided critical feedback on results, drafted the manuscript, and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (Comitato Etico Regione Lombardia, Sezione Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta”) and by the local committee at each involved site. The study conforms with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants gave written informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

Anonymized data are available from the corresponding author upon request. The dataset generated in this study is available in the Zenodo repository https://zenodo.org/communities/irfmn-irccs?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest (it will be available from 13 October 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Goutman, S.A.; Hardiman, O.; Al-Chalabi, A.; Chió, A.; Savelieff, M.G.; Kiernan, M.C.; Feldman, E.L. Recent advances in the diagnosis and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2022, 21, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Raggi, A.; Monasta, L.; Beghi, E.; Caso, V.; Castelpietra, G.; Mondello, S.; Giussani, G.; Logroscino, G.; Magnani, F.G.; Piccininni, M.; et al. Incidence, prevalence and disability associated with neurological disorders in Italy between 1990 and 2019: An analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J. Neurol. 2022, 269, 2080–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bianchi, E.; Pupillo, E.; De Feudis, A.; Enia, G.; Vitelli, E.; Beghi, E. Trends in survival of ALS from a population-based registry. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2022, 23, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Agosta, F.; Spinelli, E.G.; Riva, N.; Fontana, A.; Basaia, S.; Canu, E.; Castelnovo, V.; Falzone, Y.; Carrera, P.; Comi, G.; et al. Survival prediction models in motor neuron disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2019, 26, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sabatelli, M.; Zollino, M.; Luigetti, M.; Del Grande, A.; Lattante, S.; Marangi, G.; Monaco, M.L.; Madia, F.; Meleo, E.; Bisogni, G.; et al. Uncovering amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotypes: Clinical features and long-term follow-up of upper motor neuron-dominant ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2011, 12, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Leighton, D.J.; Ansari, M.; Newton, J.; Parry, D.; Cleary, E.; Colville, S.; Stephenson, L.; Larraz, J.; Johnson, M.; Beswick, E.; et al. Genotype-phenotype characterisation of long survivors with motor neuron disease in Scotland. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 1702–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Waller, R.; Bury, J.J.; Appleby-Mallinder, C.; Wyles, M.; Loxley, G.; Babel, A.; Shekari, S.; Kazoka, M.; Wollff, H.; Al-Chalabi, A.; et al. Establishing mRNA and microRNA interactions driving disease heterogeneity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient survival. Brain Commun. 2023, 6, fcad331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hardiman, O.; Al-Chalabi, A.; Brayne, C.; Beghi, E.; Berg, L.H.v.D.; Chio, A.; Martin, S.; Logroscino, G.; Rooney, J. The changing picture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Lessons from European registers. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2017, 88, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Witzel, S.; Wagner, M.; Zhao, C.; Kandler, K.; Graf, E.; Berutti, R.; Oexle, K.; Brenner, D.; Winkelmann, J.; Ludolph, A.C. Fast versus slow disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-clinical and genetic factors at the edges of the survival spectrum. Neurobiol. Aging. 2022, 119, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pupillo, E.; Messina, P.; Logroscino, G.; Beghi, E.; SLALOM Group. Long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population-based study. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 75, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mateen, F.J.; Carone, M.; Sorenson, E.J. Patients who survive 5 years or more with ALS in Olmsted County, 1925–2004. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2010, 81, 1144–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chiò, A.; Logroscino, G.; Hardiman, O.; Swingler, R.; Mitchell, D.; Beghi, E.; Traynor, B.G. Prognostic factors in ALS: A critical review. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2009, 10, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vasta, R.; De Mattei, F.; Tafaro, S.; Canosa, A.; Manera, U.; Grassano, M.; Palumbo, F.; Cabras, S.; Matteoni, E.; Di Pede, F.; et al. Changes to Average Survival of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (1995–2018): Results From the Piemonte and Valle d’Aosta Registry. Neurology 2025, 104, e213467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Czaplinski, A.; Yen, A.A.; Appel, S.H. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Early predictors of prolonged survival. J. Neurol. 2006, 253, 1428–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zoccolella, S.; Beghi, E.; Palagano, G.; Fraddosio, A.; Guerra, V.; Samarelli, V.; Lepore, V.; Simone, I.L.; Lamberti, P.; Serlenga, L.; et al. Predictors of long survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population-based study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 268, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fang, T.; Al Khleifat, A.; Meurgey, J.H.; Jones, A.; Leigh, P.N.; Bensimon, G.; Al-Chalabi, A. Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for non-long-survivors and long-survivors. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the entire sample.
Figure 1. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for non-long-survivors and long-survivors. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the entire sample.
Jcm 14 07351 g001
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the entire sample and for long-survivors vs. non-long-survivors.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the entire sample and for long-survivors vs. non-long-survivors.
Total (n = 828)Survival < 10 Years (n = 767)Survival ≥ 10 Years (n = 61)p-Value
MedianIQRMedianIQRMedianIQR
Follow-up duration2.21.1–4.41.91.0–3.612.912.0–14.5<0.0001
Age at diagnosis66.358.2–73.067.259.1–73.457.248.2–63.8<0.0001
Age at onset65.457.1–72.26658.0–72.655.545.2–62.4<0.0001
Diagnostic delay * (months)9.15.5–13.495.4–13.112.18.0–21.10.0003
n%n%n%
Diagnosis period 0.4986
1998–200240148.437448.82744.3
2008–201242751.639351.23455.7
Sex 0.0024
Female37144.835546.31626.2
Male45755.241253.74573.8
El Escorial category at diagnosis 0.0555
Definite ALS31137.629738.71423
Probable ALS30336.627936.424 39.3
Possible ALS8710.5 77 10 1016.4
Suspected ALS12715.311414.91321.3
Site of onset 0.0108
Bulbar/generalized3314031641.21524.6
Spinal4976045158.84675.4
PEG 0.8174
No3186228561.83363.5
Yes1953817638.21936.5
Missing315 306 9
NIV 0.2361
No30860.628161.52752.9
Yes20039.417638.52447.1
Missing320 310 10
Riluzole 0.0916
No7217.16216.11027
Yes35082.932383.92773
Missing406 382 24
* Time from onset to diagnosis in months.
Table 2. Characteristics of long-survivors subjected to tracheostomy.
Table 2. Characteristics of long-survivors subjected to tracheostomy.
SubjectYear of OnsetSexSite of OnsetYear of DiagnosisStatusSurvival Time from Diagnosis (Years)Tracheostomy-Free Survival Time (Years)
11999MaleSpinal2000Dead13.812.2
22001MaleSpinal2001Alive22.412.7
32000MaleSpinal2001Alive22.68.2
42008MaleBulbar2009Dead11.90.9
52011MaleSpinal2012Dead12.35.1
62009MaleSpinal2009Alive14.58.2
72010MaleSpinal2011Dead13.43.3
82009MaleSpinal2009Dead12.92.7
92006MaleBulbar2008Alive14.412.7
102008MaleSpinal2009Dead13.76.9
112006MaleSpinal2008Alive15.4Not available
Table 3. Characteristics of long-survivor subjects and gene evaluations.
Table 3. Characteristics of long-survivor subjects and gene evaluations.
SubjectGenderYear of OnsetSite of OnsetYear of DiagnosisStatusGenetic Test PerformedMutation Identified
AMale2009Bulbar2010DeadNone
BMale2008Spinal2010DeadNone
CFemale1999Spinal2001DeadNone
DFemale2009Spinal2011DeadNone
EFemale2001Spinal2002AliveNone
FFemale2000Spinal2004AliveNone
GMale2011Spinal2012DeadNone
HMale2010Spinal2011DeadNone
JMale2008Spinal2009DeadNone
KMale2004Spinal2009AliveNone
IFemale2012Spinal2012AliveNone
LMale2008Spinal2009DeadNone
MMale2008Spinal2009DeadNone
NMale2009Spinal2009DeadNone
OMale2008Bulbar2009DeadSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
PMale2011Spinal2012DeadSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
QMale2010Spinal2011DeadSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
RFemale2010Spinal2010DeadSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72TDP43
SFemale2010Bulbar2011DeadSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
TFemale2010Spinal2011AliveSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
UMale2011Spinal2012AliveSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
VFemale2011Spinal2011AliveSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
WMale2006Spinal2008AliveSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
XFemale2007Bulbar2008AliveC9ORF72None
YMale2008Spinal2009DeadSOD1None
ZMale2011Spinal2012AliveSOD1, FUS, TDP43, C9ORF72None
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pupillo, E.; Bianchi, E.; Leone, M.A.; Corbo, M.; Filosto, M.; Padovani, A.; Risi, B.; Vedovello, M.; dell’Era, V.; Cerri, F.; et al. Understanding Long-Term Survival in ALS: A Cohort Study on Subject Characteristics and Prognostic Factors. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207351

AMA Style

Pupillo E, Bianchi E, Leone MA, Corbo M, Filosto M, Padovani A, Risi B, Vedovello M, dell’Era V, Cerri F, et al. Understanding Long-Term Survival in ALS: A Cohort Study on Subject Characteristics and Prognostic Factors. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(20):7351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pupillo, Elisabetta, Elisa Bianchi, Maurizio Angelo Leone, Massimo Corbo, Massimiliano Filosto, Alessandro Padovani, Barbara Risi, Marcella Vedovello, Valentina dell’Era, Federica Cerri, and et al. 2025. "Understanding Long-Term Survival in ALS: A Cohort Study on Subject Characteristics and Prognostic Factors" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 20: 7351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207351

APA Style

Pupillo, E., Bianchi, E., Leone, M. A., Corbo, M., Filosto, M., Padovani, A., Risi, B., Vedovello, M., dell’Era, V., Cerri, F., Morelli, C., Diamanti, L., Ceroni, M., Falzone, Y., Rigamonti, A., & Vitelli, E. (2025). Understanding Long-Term Survival in ALS: A Cohort Study on Subject Characteristics and Prognostic Factors. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(20), 7351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop