This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Evaluating the Divide Between Patients’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease Cases: Insights from the PRO-AOSD Survey
1
Department of Internal Medicine V, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2
Center for Rare Diseases Heidelberg (ZSEHD), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
3
Rheumatology Research, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany
4
Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, 44649 Herne, Germany
5
Department of Internal Medicine 3—Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
6
Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
7
Center for Rare Diseases Erlangen (ZSEER), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
8
Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
9
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Helios Fachklinik Vogelsang-Gommern Klinik für Rheumatologie, 39245 Gommern, Germany
10
Experimental Rheumatology, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 7034; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197034 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 August 2025
/
Revised: 26 September 2025
/
Accepted: 30 September 2025
/
Published: 4 October 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aims to report and compare data from the PRO-AOSD (patient-reported outcomes adult-onset Still’s disease) survey in patients with AOSD from the perspective of patients and their treating physicians. Methods: PRO-AOSD comprised blinded patient and physician surveys. The surveys were designed to assess perceived symptoms and physical impairment. Outcomes reported here include patient demographics; physicians’ assessment of the patient’s health state; physician-reported laboratory findings; pain; disease activity; symptoms; physicians’ treatment goals; and the impact of lifestyle factors on disease improvement. Results: Adult patients with AOSD were recruited from 19 centers in Germany. A total of 124 patients were included, with 74 (59.7%) females; the mean age was 45.5 years. The mean time from first symptom to diagnosis was 2 years, and the mean time was 7 years from diagnosis to survey completion (N = 123). Of 107 patients, most (81.3%) had inactive disease defined by CRP levels. At the time of the survey, around two-thirds of patients were receiving biologic therapy, with 84.1% (69/82) reporting an improvement in symptoms. Many patients had previously received antibiotics (47.6% [n = 58] and 30.4% [n = 37], per patient and physician reports, respectively). Persistent symptoms were reported more frequently by patients than by physicians, including back pain (39.5%), fatigue and weakness (38.7%), and joint inflammation (27.4%). Physicians classified 35.5% of patients as symptom-free. Patients reported exercise as having a positive impact on symptoms (52.4%), while stress (74.2%) and sleep deprivation (62.9%) were reported to worsen symptoms. Targeting systemic manifestations, such as the absence of fever (58.1%, n = 72), was considered the most important treatment goal by physicians. Conclusions: Data from PRO-AOSD highlight distinct differences between patients’ and physicians’ interpretations of the same cases of AOSD. Prior presentation: These data were presented at the German Congress of Rheumatology (DGRh; 30 August–2 September 2023; Leipzig, Germany).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Blank, N.; Andreica, I.; Rech, J.; Sözen, Z.; Feist, E.
Evaluating the Divide Between Patients’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease Cases: Insights from the PRO-AOSD Survey. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7034.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197034
AMA Style
Blank N, Andreica I, Rech J, Sözen Z, Feist E.
Evaluating the Divide Between Patients’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease Cases: Insights from the PRO-AOSD Survey. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(19):7034.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197034
Chicago/Turabian Style
Blank, Norbert, Ioana Andreica, Jürgen Rech, Zekayi Sözen, and Eugen Feist.
2025. "Evaluating the Divide Between Patients’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease Cases: Insights from the PRO-AOSD Survey" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 19: 7034.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197034
APA Style
Blank, N., Andreica, I., Rech, J., Sözen, Z., & Feist, E.
(2025). Evaluating the Divide Between Patients’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease Cases: Insights from the PRO-AOSD Survey. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(19), 7034.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197034
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.