Next Article in Journal
The Pulmonary Manifestation of Mastocytosis: Experiences of the National Reference Centre of Excellence
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Association Between Platelet Count, the Systemic Immune Inflammation Index, and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anterior Chamber Configuration and Its Related Factors Among 8-Year-Old Children in the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study

by
Mingxue Bao
1,
Ryo Harada
1,
Yuka Kasai
1,
Natsuki Okabe
1,
Airi Takahashi
1,
Chio Kuleshov
1,
Yumi Shigemoto
1,
Tadao Ooka
2,
Hiroshi Yokomichi
3,
Kunio Miyake
3,
Reiji Kojima
3,
Ryoji Shinohara
4,
Hideki Yui
4,
Sanae Otawa
4,
Anna Kobayashi
4,
Megumi Kushima
4,
Zentaro Yamagata
4,
Kenji Kashiwagi
1,* and
on behalf of The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group
1
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo 409-3898, Japan
2
Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo 409-3898, Japan
3
Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, Chuo 409-3898, Japan
4
Center for Birth Cohort Studies, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo 409-3898, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membership of the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5454; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155454 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 30 July 2025 / Accepted: 1 August 2025 / Published: 3 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the anterior chamber structure and related factors in 8-year-old children based on data from The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Methods: A total of 709 children aged 8 years (350 boys and 359 girls) who participated in the JECS Adjunct Study were included. The right eyes were primarily used for measurements. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was utilized to scan the anterior chambers of the participants’ eyes. The following parameters were measured: Angle Opening Distance (AOD500, 750), Trabecular Iris Space Area (TISA500, 750), Anterior Chamber Angle (ACA500, 750), Peripheral Iris Thickness (IT500, 750), and Peripheral Corneal Thickness (PCT500, 750). The relationships between anterior chamber structure, axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), logMAR (without correction), and body height were analyzed. Results: A significant negative correlation was found between SE and ACA (500: coefficient = −0.19; 750: −0.24), AOD (500: −0.19; 750: −0.24), and TISA (500: −0.17; 750: −0.23) (p < 0.001). Conversely, a significant positive correlation was observed between AL and ACA (500: 0.22; 750: 0.26), AOD (500: 0.25; 750: 0.30), and TISA (500: 0.24; 750: 0.29) (p < 0.001). Boys exhibited a longer AL (boys: girls = 23.30 ± 0.76 mm; girls = 22.79 ± 0.72 mm) and greater CT (500: boys = 812.82 ± 51.94 mm; girls = 784.48 ± 51.81 mm; 750: boys = 776.01 ± 48.64 mm; girls = 751.34 ± 49.63 mm) compared to girls (p < 0.001) despite no significant difference in body height. CT and IT showed no correlation with AL or SE, and visual acuity had minimal correlation with IT and CT. Conclusions: In our cohort of eight-year-old children, the anterior chamber angle structure correlates with ocular structures and refractive error, revealing notable differences between boys and girls.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide [1]. In Japan, the prevalence of glaucoma is reported to be 5% among individuals aged 40 and older. Among all types of glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common, with a prevalence of 3.9%, while primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) has a prevalence of only 0.6% [2,3]. PACG is particularly prevalent in certain Asian regions and can lead to blindness if not treated promptly [4]; thus, early detection is crucial. The angle configuration plays an important role in regulating intraocular pressure and the development of glaucoma. Previous studies on angle configuration primarily involved adults, revealing correlations between angle closure and factors such as age and gender [5,6,7,8]. However, limited research has focused on children due to their lack of cooperation during gonioscopy, which is uncomfortable and invasive. Recent advancements in optical coherence tomography (OCT) have enabled the examination of angle configuration in children [9]. One study reported that the width of the anterior chamber and the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber increase from birth to around 5 years of age, while another study found that angle openness increases with growth [10]. Additionally, a relationship between angle configuration and hyperopia has been noted [11]. Despite these insights, investigations into the associations between anterior chamber configuration and factors such as refractive error and axial length in children—particularly in East Asian populations—remain limited. Further research is needed to identify the underlying determinants and to establish normative reference values for ocular development in childhood.

2. Subjects and Methods

Since 2011, the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) has been conducting the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). The JECS is a prospective birth cohort study that aims to elucidate how the environment affects children’s health and create an environment in which children can grow up healthy [12,13]. Approximately 4400 participants participated in The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the JECS. The protocol has been conducted in various medical fields, including ophthalmology, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, otolaryngology, endocrinology, dentistry, oral surgery, immunology, and others. Ophthalmologic examinations encompass assessments of visual acuity, refractive error (expressed as the spherical equivalent -SE), axial length, OCT examinations, as well as questionnaires for caregivers. Building upon the findings from these studies, this research aims to investigate the correlation between angle configuration parameters, refractive error, axial length, and visual acuity in children. The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the factors influencing the angle configuration.
The study will proceed with the prior approval of the Steering Committee Chair and the Director of the Program Office; written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The JECS protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies (IRB number: 100910001). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yamanashi University (No. 2070).
The study targets eight-year-old participants who took part in the JECS-Y (Japan Environment and Children’s Study—Yamanashi) conducted at the University of Yamanashi in April 1 2021 through March 31 2023. The participants underwent an eye examination, a body composition test, and a questionnaire survey. All examinations were conducted on the same day. The ophthalmological examination included the following parameters: uncorrected visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE) without the use of a cycloplegic agent, axial length (AL), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). All ophthalmologic examinations were performed by ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Visual acuity was measured using an autorefractor (NIDEK AR-F, Gamagori, Japan). If visual acuity was found to be less than 20/20, corrected visual acuity was measured based on refractive values without the use of an accommodation paralytic agent. AL measurements were conducted for both eyes using an optical measuring device (NIDEK AL-SCAN, Gamagori, Japan). The quantification of the angle chamber measurements was performed using the anterior segment mode and angle mode of OCT (NIDEX EX, Gamagori, Japan). This device enables rapid image acquisition without direct contact with the eyeball. During the imaging process, alignment was ensured by utilizing a fixed lamp in the OCT. Multiple scans were performed, and the image with the highest clarity was selected for analysis. To ensure image quality, a signal strength index (SSI) threshold of 7 or higher was applied. Cases that presented difficulties in imaging due to non-cooperation from the subject, inadequate fixation, improper positioning of the head or forehead, as well as images with an SSI below 7, were excluded from the analysis. Subsequently, the corner angle measurement mode of NAVIS-EX was employed for the angle measurements. To ensure recognition accuracy, the position of the scleral spur was manually identified by an examiner according to the criteria [8,14,15].
The measured parameters, including the anterior chamber angle (ACA), angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular iris space area (TISA), peripheral iris thickness (PIT), and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), were determined using established methodologies reported in previous studies [16,17,18]. Anterior chamber angle parameters were measured in both eyes of all participants, excluding images of insufficient quality due to inadequate cooperation. Measurements were conducted at 500 µm and 750 µm from the scleral spur, with five parameters assessed at each location. The AOD500 (750) was the distance from the scleral spur on the posterior surface of the cornea to the anterior surface of the iris, measured along a perpendicular line drawn from the corneal endothelial surface at a position of 500 (750). TISA500 (750) denotes the area enclosed by a line drawn from the scleral spur to the iris surface, parallel to AOD500 (750). The ACA500 (750) is defined as the angle formed between the posterior corneal surface and the iris surface at 500 (750) from the scleral spur. IT500 (750) represents the thickness of the iris at the location corresponding to AOD500 (750), while CT500 (750) signifies the corneal thickness at the same AOD500 (750) position (Figure 1).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis in this study was conducted using Easy R software (Mac OS X version). LogMAR was used to evaluate visual acuity. Associations between anterior chamber angle parameters and AL, SE, uncorrected logMAR visual acuity, and height were analyzed. Differences in the logMAR visual acuity, AL, SE, anterior chamber angle parameters, and body measurements between sexes were assessed using independent t-tests. The degree of association between the variables was assessed using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted using anterior chamber angle parameters as dependent variables, with AL, SE, uncorrected logMAR visual acuity, sex, and height as independent variables. Mean values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for each parameter, and a significance level of 5% was adopted as the threshold for statistical significance. Numbers are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Excluding 207 individuals who did not meet the eligibility criteria among a total of 916 applicants, the exclusions included 54 patients who did not cooperate with anterior ocular (OCT) imaging, 116 patients who had difficulty undergoing OCT imaging according to the enrollment criteria, and 37 patients whose visual acuity measurement showed poor reliability. Of the 709 applicants who met the enrollment criteria, 350 were boys and 359 were girls. In total, 460 of the right eyes were employed and 249 of the left eyes were employed when the right eye did not meet the enrollment criteria. The mean SSI analyzed was 9 ± 1 (range 7–10).

3.2. Correlation of Angle Parameters with SE, AL, and logMAR

Table 1 summarizes the correlation of angle configuration with SE, AL, and uncorrected LogMAR. Figure 2,Figure 3 and Figure 4 show scatter plots of their correlations. ACA500 (r = −0.19, p < 0.001), ACA750 (r = −0.24, p < 0.001), AOD500 (r = −0.19, p < 0.001), AOD750 (r = −0.24, p < 0.001), TISA500 (r = −0.17, p < 0.001), and TISA750 (r = −0.23, p < 0.001) showed significant negative correlations with SE. In contrast, ACA500 (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), ACA750 (r = 0.26, p < 0.001), AOD500 (r = 0.25, p < 0.001), AOD750 (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), TISA500 (r = 0.24, p < 0.001), and TISA750 (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) exhibited significant positive correlations with AL. Moreover, ACA500 (r = 0.16, p < 0.001), ACA750 (r = 0.19, p < 0.001), AOD500 (r = 0.18, p < 0.001), AOD750 (r = 0.21, p < 0.001), TISA500 (r = 0.16, p < 0.001), and TISA750 (r = 0.19, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with uncorrected logMAR visual acuity. PCT500 (r = 0.11, p = 0.004) and PCT750 (r = 0.11, p = 0.006) demonstrated a positive correlation with AL, whereas no significant correlation with SE or uncorrected logMAR was observed. In addition, PIT (500, 750) showed no significant correlation with SE or uncorrected logMAR at either the 500 μm or 750 μm distances.
Figure 2 shows the correlation of SE and ACA (Figure 2a), AOD (Figure 2b), and TISA (Figure 2c). These three angle parameters became greater with the myopia shift in refractive error. Figure 3 shows the correlation of the angle parameters with AL. The angle parameters became greater with the elongation of AL. Figure 4 shows the correlation of angle parameters with uncorrected logMAR. The angle parameters became greater with the deterioration of uncorrected logMAR.

3.3. Comparison Between Boys and Girls

Table 2 summarizes the differences between boys and girls. There were no significant differences between boys and girls in terms of SE, uncorrected logMAR, and body height; however, boys showed a significantly longer AL compared to girls (boys: 23.30 ± 0.76 mm; girls: 22.79 ± 0.72 mm) (p < 0.001). Several angle parameters showed significant differences between boys and girls. Boys had significantly greater PCT500 and PCT750 values than girls (PCT500: boys = 812.82 ± 51.94 µm, girls = 784.48 ± 51.81 µm; PCT750: boys = 776.01 ± 48.64 µm, girls = 751.34 ± 49.63 µm; p < 0.001). In addition, boys exhibited significantly wider AOD750 (p = 0.02) and ACA750 (p = 0.007) compared to girls. TISA750 also tended to be larger in boys, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. No significant sex-related differences were observed in SE, uncorrected logMAR visual acuity, or height.

3.4. Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Influencing the Angle Configuration

Table 3 shows the results of the multiple regression analysis with angle configuration parameters as the dependent variables, and AL, SE, uncorrected logMAR, gender, and height as the explanatory variables. ACA500 (β = 0.13, p < 0.001), ACA750 (β = 0.15, p < 0.001), AOD500 (β = 0.18, p < 0.001), AOD750 (β = 0.20, p < 0.001), TISA500 (β = 0.18, p < 0.001), and TISA750 (β = 0.22, p < 0.001) showed significant positive associations with axial length (AL). In contrast, ACA500 (β = −0.11, p = 0.005), ACA750 (β = −0.14, p < 0.001), AOD500 (β = −0.08, p = 0.009), AOD750 (β = −0.12, p < 0.001), TISA500 (β = −0.06, p = 0.03), and TISA750 (β = −0.10, p = 0.003) were negatively associated with spherical equivalent (SE). Additionally, AOD500 (β = 0.10, p = 0.008), AOD750 (β = 0.07, p = 0.04), TISA500 (β = 0.10, p = 0.005), and TISA750 (β = 0.08, p = 0.03) showed significant positive correlations with body height at both measurement distances. Only the CT of boys was significantly thicker than that of girls at both the 500 μm (β = −0.24, p < 0.001) and 750 μm (β = −0.20, p < 0.001) distances. There was no significant correlation between IT and CT with all explanatory variables except for gender. The uncorrected logMAR did not show any significant correlation with all investigated parameters.

4. Discussion

Angle configuration not only contributes to the regulation of intraocular pressure and the development of glaucoma. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the factors involved in angle configuration. As stated in the review article by Chen et al. [19], previous studies on pediatric eyes have primarily focused on measurements such as AL, central CT, the central anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness [11,20,21,22]. However, there is a limited amount of analysis on the angle configuration associated with the development of ocular morphology and function in pediatric eyes [19]. Table 4 shows previous studies on pediatric ocular structures [11,20,21,22]. In this study, we examined the anterior configuration and the associated factors employing a larger sample size compared to previous reports. As a result, it was found that there is a significant relationship between the anterior configuration and AL, SE, and body height according to the multiple regression analysis. Additionally, we found a significant gender difference in several angle configuration parameters.
Shimizu et al. reported that AOD500 is correlated with AL and SE [23] by studying 154 participants aged 6 months to 15 years, after adjusting for the age effect. Edawaji et al. reported that AOD and TISA showed a negative correlation (p < 0.001) with SE [11]. Daniel et al. reported nasal angle configuration parameters in 50 participants aged 4 to 16 years, in which AOD500, AOD750, and TISA750 showed a significant negative correlation with SE. These results were consistent with the current findings. However, the correlation between SE and TISA500 was not consistent with a previous study [20]. Amerasinghe et al. reported that AOD500 and TISA500 exhibit a negative correlation with SE and a positive correlation with AL [24], which is consistent with the current study. The possible reasons for this discrepancy include differences in sample size, ethnic variations, and variations in measurement devices. Although no previous studies investigated the correlation of angle configuration with IT among children, the current findings are consistent with previous reports in adults [25,26]. In a study involving 86 adult patients with angle-closure and open-angle glaucoma, the univariate analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between AOD500 and AL [26]. The correlation between AL and angle configuration parameters was observed in normal eyes as well as eyes with angle-closure or open-angle glaucoma, indicating the importance of eye development in determining angle configuration.
It is well-established that there are gender differences in the axial length of the eye [10,27,28,29]. This study revealed that boys have a significantly larger AL compared with girls despite having a similar body height, as reported in our previous report [27]. In addition to AL, some angle configuration parameters show a significant gender difference. Previous papers reported gender differences in ACA, AOD, and TISA among children aged from 2 days to 15 years and 52 adults in 20 s [11,30]. Amerasinghe et al. reported significant gender differences in AOD500 and nasal TISA500 among adults at 50 s [24]. This gender difference could potentially be influenced by age, lens status, and race. Gender differences in angle configuration among children may indicate that gender influences the development of angle configuration. We only included 8-year-old children in the current study. The significant gender difference observed in this study may suggest a possible association with a higher prevalence of angle-closure glaucoma in females. It is necessary to investigate gender differences in the development of angles using a wide age range or a longitudinal study. Zheng et al. reported that central and 3.0 mm peripheral corneal thickness is significantly thinner in females compared to males [31], which is consistent with the current result. Although the current result did not show a significant gender difference, it is an important factor in angle-closure glaucoma, and Mak et al. reported that the average iris volume, along with open-angle and angle-closure iris volumes, is a significant determinant of the anterior chamber angle [32]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the physiological or pathological implications of such gender differences in these factors further.
The current study has some limitations. Although the examinations were scheduled to occur as close as possible to the month in which participants turned 8 years of age, they were primarily conducted during holidays and vacation periods to improve participation rates. As a result, the assessments were not strictly performed at 8 years and 0 months. However, since the examinations were conducted at ages closely approximating 8 years, any potential developmental differences are unlikely to have significantly influenced the study findings. Refractive error was conducted without using accommodative paralysis agents, which introduces the possibility of deviation from the true values in the measured SE. Due to instrumental limitations, OCT evaluation was only performed on the temporal side. Pinilla et al. reported that angle parameters such as ACA and AOD are larger on the nasal side compared to the temporal side [30]. It is necessary to measure other portions in addition to the temporal side in future studies. Approximately 22.6% of all subjects were excluded by satisfying exclusion criteria. Thus, there is a possibility of selection bias in the study population. A comparison between the cases included in the analysis and those excluded in this study revealed no significant differences in the sex ratio, uncorrected visual acuity, axial length, or refractive error. Therefore, the present findings may be considered representative of the anterior chamber angle configuration in Japanese 8-year-old children. We failed to evaluate some important factors related to angle closure glaucoma, such as the lens vault [33], lens thickness, and iris curvature in the current study. Given the need to conduct a wide range of multidisciplinary assessments within a limited timeframe, it was not feasible to allocate additional time for the measurement of these parameters. These parameters should be subject to future investigations. Chansangpetch et al. reported that there are significant racial differences in anterior angle parameters such as AOD500, AOD750, TISA500, and TISA750 among adult subjects [34]. It is well known that there is a significant racial difference in the prevalence of angle-closure glaucoma among adult subjects. There are few studies on racial differences in angle configuration among children. Further studies in this area are necessary.
According to population-based surveys in East Asia and Southeast Asia, the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma has consistently been high [35]. The results of this study may provide fundamental data on angle morphology in children and contribute valuable insights for research on angle-related conditions such as angle closure. We are now conducting long-term prospective studies to investigate the longitudinal changes in angle configuration and associated factors. Additionally, this study incorporates the analysis of prenatal and postnatal lifestyle habits, environmental factors, as well as various physical and mental information beyond the scope of ophthalmology. These upcoming studies may elucidate the relationship between changes in angle configuration over time, their influencing factors, and the structural changes in the eye, and how they relate to the occurrence of future eye diseases. The conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and K.K.; methodology, M.B., Y.K., N.O., A.T., C.K., Y.S. and K.K.; validation, M.B. and K.K.; formal analysis, M.B. and R.H.; investigation, M.B., Y.K., N.O., A.T., C.K., Y.S. and K.K.; data curation, Y.K., N.O., A.T., C.K., Y.S., R.K., R.S., H.Y. (Hideki Yui), S.O., A.K. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.; writing—review and editing, T.O., H.Y. (Hideki Yui), K.M., R.K., R.S., H.Y. (Hiroshi Yokomichi), Z.Y. and K.K.; supervision, Z.Y.; project administration, M.B. and K.K.; funding acquisition, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. This adjunct study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, No. 23K09003.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study will proceed with the prior approval of the Steering Committee Chair and the Director of the Program Office, Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The JECS protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies (IRB number: 100910001/approval date: 2019-06-26). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yamanashi University (No. 2070).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are unsuitable for public deposition due to ethical restrictions and the legal framework of Japan. It is prohibited by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No.57 of 30 May 2003, amendment on 9 September 2015) to publicly deposit the data containing personal information. Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects enforced by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also restricts the open sharing of the epidemiologic data. All inquiries about access to data should be sent to: rshinohara@yamanashi.ac.jp. The person responsible for handling enquiries sent to this e-mail address is Dr Ryoji Shinohara, director of Koshin Unit Center for JECS.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the participants involved in the JECS-Y and to all individuals involved in the data collection. We also thank the following members of the JECS-Y as of 2020: Zentaro Yamagata (Principal Investigator, email: zenymgt@yamanashi.ac.jp), Ryoji Shinohara, Sanae Otawa, Anna Kobayashi, Megumi Kushima, and Hideki Yui (Center for Birth Cohort Studies, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Takeshi Inukai (Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Kyoichiro Tsuchiya (Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Hirotaka Haro, and Masanori Wako (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Takahiko Mitsui (Department of Urology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Kenji Kashiwagi (Department of Ophthalmology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Daijyu Sakurai (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Koichiro Ueki and Sumire Ono (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan); Tadao Ooka (Department of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi); Hiroshi Yokomichi, Kunio Miyake, Sayaka Horiuchi, and Reiji Kojima (Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tham, Y.C.; Li, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Quigley, H.A.; Aung, T.; Cheng, C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2081–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iwase, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Araie, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Abe, H.; Shirato, S.; Kuwayama, Y.; Mishima, H.K.; Shimizu, H.; Tomita, G.; et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: The Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2004, 111, 1641–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamamoto, T.; Iwase, A.; Araie, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Abe, H.; Shirato, S.; Kuwayama, Y.; Mishima, H.K.; Shimizu, H.; Tomita, G.; et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: Prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology 2005, 112, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gazzard, G.; Foster, P.J.; Devereux, J.G.; Oen, F.; Chew, P.; Khaw, P.T.; Seah, S. Intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Friedman, D.S.; Gazzard, G.; Min, C.B.; Broman, A.T.; Quigley, H.; Tielsch, J.; Seah, S.; Foster, P.J. Age and sex variation in angle findings among normal Chinese subjects: A comparison of UBM, Scheimpflug, and gonioscopic assessment of the anterior chamber angle. J. Glaucoma 2008, 17, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hoerauf, H.; Gordes, R.S.; Scholz, C.; Wirbelauer, C.; Koch, P.; Engelhardt, R.; Winkler, J.; Laqua, H.; Birngruber, R. First experimental and clinical results with transscleral optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers 2000, 31, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hoerauf, H.; Scholz, C.; Koch, P.; Engelhardt, R.; Laqua, H.; Birngruber, R. Transscleral optical coherence tomography: A new imaging method for the anterior segment of the eye. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002, 120, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Masoodi, H.; Jafarzadehpur, E.; Esmaeili, A.; Abolbashari, F.; Ahmadi Hosseini, S.M. Evaluation of anterior chamber angle under dark and light conditions in angle closure glaucoma: An anterior segment OCT study. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2014, 37, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Leung, C.K.; Li, H.; Weinreb, R.N.; Liu, J.; Cheung, C.Y.; Lai, R.Y.; Pang, C.P.; Lam, D.S.C. Anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: A comparison between slit lamp OCT and Visante OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 3469–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jin, P.; Li, M.; He, X.; Lu, L.; Zhu, J.; Chang, T.C.; Zou, H. Anterior-Chamber Angle and Axial Length Measurements in Normal Chinese Children. J. Glaucoma 2016, 25, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Edawaji, B.S.A.; Gottlob, I.; Proudlock, F.A. Anterior Chamber Measurements in Healthy Children: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kawamoto, T.; Nitta, H.; Murata, K.; Toda, E.; Tsukamoto, N.; Hasegawa, M.; Yamagata, Z.; Kayama, F.; Kishi, R.; Ohya, Y.; et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Michikawa, T.; Nitta, H.; Nakayama, S.F.; Yamazaki, S.; Isobe, T.; Tamura, K.; Suda, E.; Ono, M.; Yonemoto, J.; Iwai-Shimada, M.; et al. Baseline Profile of Participants in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J. Epidemiol. 2018, 28, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chan, P.P.; Lai, G.; Chiu, V.; Chong, A.; Yu, M.; Leung, C.K. Anterior chamber angle imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography: Comparison between CASIAII and ANTERION. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Seager, F.E.; Wang, J.; Arora, K.S.; Quigley, H.A. The effect of scleral spur identification methods on structural measurements by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J. Glaucoma 2014, 23, e29–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pavlin, C.J.; Harasiewicz, K.; Foster, F.S. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment structures in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1992, 113, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Radhakrishnan, S.; Huang, D.; Smith, S.D. Optical coherence tomography imaging of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmol. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 18, 375–381, vi. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, H.; Leung, C.K.; Cheung, C.Y.; Wong, L.; Pang, C.P.; Weinreb, R.N.; Lam, D.S.C. Repeatability and reproducibility of anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 91, 1490–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Z.; Li, J.; He, M. Normal range of ocular biometry in healthy children: A systemic review and meta-analysis of 33,559 individuals under seven years of age. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2022, 42, 1264–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Daniel, M.C.; Dubis, A.M.; Quartilho, A.; Al-Hayouti, H.; Khaw, S.P.T.; Theodorou, M.; Dahlmann-Noor, A. Dynamic Changes in Schlemm Canal and Iridocorneal Angle Morphology During Accommodation in Children With Healthy Eyes: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 3497–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hashemi, H.; Jafarzadehpur, E.; Ghaderi, S.; Yekta, A.; Ostadimoghaddam, H.; Norouzirad, R.; Khabazkhoob, M. Ocular components during the ages of ocular development. Acta. Ophthalmol. 2015, 93, e74–e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yeter, V.; Aritürk, N.; Bİrİncİ, H.; Süllü, Y.; Güngör, İ. Effects of Birth Weight on Anterior Segment Measurements in Full-Term Children Without Low Birth Weight by Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 832–840.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shimizu, Y.; Nakakura, S.; Nagasawa, T.; Okamoto, A.; Tabuchi, H.; Kiuchi, Y. Comparison of the anterior chamber angle structure between children and adults. J. AAPOS 2017, 21, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Amerasinghe, N.; Foster, P.J.; Wong, T.Y.; Htoon, H.M.; He, M.; Shen, S.Y.; Aung, H.T.; Saw, S.-M.; Aung, T. Variation of angle parameters in asians: An anterior segment optical coherence tomography study in a population of singapore malays. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 2626–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.E.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; He, M.; Lin, S. Comparison of factors associated with occludable angle between american Caucasians and ethnic Chinese. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 7717–7723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cheung, C.Y.; Liu, S.; Weinreb, R.N.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Leung, D.Y.; Dorairaj, S.; Liebmann, J.; Ritch, R.; Lam, D.S.C.; et al. Dynamic analysis of iris configuration with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 4040–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Okabe, N.; Takahashi, A.; Shigemoto, Y.; Kogure, C.; Ooka, T.; Shinohara, R.; Otawa, S.; Kobayashi, A.; Horiuchi, S.; Kushima, M.; et al. Refractive Error and Axial Length and Their Related Factors in 8-Year-Old Japanese Children: The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, M.H.; Song, Y.; Liu, J.L.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Hua, Y.J.; Wu, Q. Investigation of ocular biometry in 4- to 9-year-old Chinese children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023, 23, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tideman, J.W.L.; Polling, J.R.; Vingerling, J.R.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Williams, C.; Guggenheim, J.A.; Klaver, C.C.W. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pinilla Lozano, I.; López de la Fuente, C.; Segura, F.; Orduna Hospital, E.; Sánchez-Cano, A. Evaluation of anterior chamber parameters with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 62, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zheng, Y.; Huang, G.; Huang, W.; He, M. Distribution of central and peripheral corneal thickness in Chinese children and adults: The Guangzhou twin eye study. Cornea 2008, 27, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mak, H.; Xu, G.; Leung, C.K. Imaging the iris with swept-source optical coherence tomography: Relationship between iris volume and primary angle closure. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2517–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moghimi, S.; Vahedian, Z.; Fakhraie, G.; Ghaffari, R.; Eslami, Y.; Jabarvand, M.; Zarei, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Lin, S. Ocular biometry in the subtypes of angle closure: An anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 155, 664–673.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chansangpetch, S.; Tran, B.; Perez, C.I.; Siguan-Bell, C.; Lau, K.; Nguyen, A.H.; Thai, A.; He, M.; Wang, D.; Nguyen, N.; et al. Comparison of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters Among Vietnamese, Chinese, and Whites. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 195, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Congdon, N.; Wang, F.; Tielsch, J.M. Issues in the epidemiology and population-based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1992, 36, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Definition of Anterior Chamber Angle Configuration Parameters Using OCT: A Right Eye Example. ACA, AOD, TISA, PIT, PCT were measured at 500 μm and 750 μm from the scleral spur. ACA: the anterior chamber angle, AOD: angle opening distance, TISA: trabecular iris space area, IT: iris thickness, CT: corneal thickness.
Figure 1. Definition of Anterior Chamber Angle Configuration Parameters Using OCT: A Right Eye Example. ACA, AOD, TISA, PIT, PCT were measured at 500 μm and 750 μm from the scleral spur. ACA: the anterior chamber angle, AOD: angle opening distance, TISA: trabecular iris space area, IT: iris thickness, CT: corneal thickness.
Jcm 14 05454 g001
Figure 2. (a). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Figure 2. (a). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Jcm 14 05454 g002
Figure 3. (a). Correlation between axial length (AL) and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between axial length (AL) and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between axial length (AL) and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Figure 3. (a). Correlation between axial length (AL) and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between axial length (AL) and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between axial length (AL) and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Jcm 14 05454 g003
Figure 4. (a). Correlation between logMAR and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between logMAR and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between logMAR and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Figure 4. (a). Correlation between logMAR and anterior chamber angle (ACA). (b). Correlation between logMAR and angle opening distance (AOD). (c). Correlation between logMAR and trabecular iris space area (TISA).
Jcm 14 05454 g004
Table 1. Correlation of the angle parameters with SE, AL, and logMAR.
Table 1. Correlation of the angle parameters with SE, AL, and logMAR.
ParametersSE
(Correlation Coefficient, p-Value)
AL
(Correlation Coefficient, p-Value)
Uncorrected logMAR
(Correlation Coefficient,
p-Value)
ACA500μm−0.19 (<0.001)0.22 (<0.001)0.16 (<0.001)
ACA750μm−0.24 (<0.001)0.26 (<0.001)0.19 (<0.001)
AOD500μm−0.19 (<0.001)0.25 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)
AOD750μm−0.24 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)0.21 (<0.001)
TISA500μm−0.17 (<0.001)0.24 (<0.001)0.16 (<0.001)
TISA750μm−0.23 (<0.001)0.29 (<0.001)0.19 (<0.001)
PCT500μm0.05 (0.22)0.11 (0.004)−0.06 (0.12)
PCT750μm0.08 (0.04)0.11 (0.006)−0.08 (0.04)
PIT500μm−0.01 (0.76)0.05 (0.21)−0.03 (0.41)
PIT750μm−0.01 (0.83)0.04 (0.35)−0.02 (0.55)
Table 2. Comparison of the parameters investigated between the boys and girls.
Table 2. Comparison of the parameters investigated between the boys and girls.
Boy (n = 350)
Mean ± SD (95%CI)
Girl (n = 359)
Mean ± SD (95%CI)
p-Value
(Boys vs. Girls)
ACA500μm37.36 ± 6.0719.40–55.6036.51 ± 5.7322.20–56.000.06
AOD500μm569.76 ± 143.87211.00–1.54.00559.56–133.24258.00–993.000.33
TISA500μm0.19 ± 0.060.06–0.380.19 ± 0.050.08–0.370.53
PIT500μm248.31 ± 42.15121.00–245.00242.65 ± 39.11139.00–391.000.06
PCT500μm812.82 ± 51.94686.00–977.00784.48 ± 51.80658.00–1072.00<0.001
ACA750μm38.46 ± 5.9019.60–53.9037.31 ± 5.3720.50–51.200.007
AOD750μm800.94 ± 173.98358.00–1449.00772.47 ± 148.53343.00–1372.000.02
TISA750μm0.38 ± 0.090.15–0.730.36 ± 0.080.15–0.700.06
PIT750μm287.05 ± 43.76150.00–422.00282.05 ± 42.85156.00–419.000.13
PCT750μm776.01 ± 48.64631.00–954.00751.34 ± 49.63634.00–1028.00<0.001
AL (mm)23.30 ± 0.7621.32–25.9322.79 ± 0.7220.20–25.61<0.001
SE (D)−0.40 ± 0.96−5.00–+4.38−0.41 ± 1.04−4.25–+5.880.86
logMAR0.08 ± 0.200.00–1.000.09 ± 0.220.00–1.520.41
Height (cm)125.44 ± 4.88113.40–139.50124.99 ± 4.88113.20–142.500.22
Table 3. Multivariable regression analysis of the associations between anterior chamber angle configuration parameters and axial length, refractive error (spherical equivalent), sex, and height. Values are expressed as standardized regression coefficients (β).
Table 3. Multivariable regression analysis of the associations between anterior chamber angle configuration parameters and axial length, refractive error (spherical equivalent), sex, and height. Values are expressed as standardized regression coefficients (β).
Response VariableALHeightlogMARSEGender
βpβpβpβpβp
ACA500μm0.13<0.0010.060.110.050.30−0.110.005−0.030.45
ACA750μm0.15<0.0010.050.200.050.22−0.14<0.001−0.050.23
AOD500μm0.18<0.0010.100.0080.060.16−0.080.0090.030.51
AOD750μm0.20<0.0010.070.040.060.22−0.12<0.001−0.020.61
TISA500μm0.18<0.0010.100.0050.050.20−0.060.030.040.30
TISA750μm0.22<0.0010.080.030.050.28−0.100.0030.0040.92
PIT500μm0.040.240.030.56−0.060.45−0.030.55−0.050.07
PIT750μm0.030.43−0.010.90−0.040.61−0.020.65−0.040.13
PCT500μm0.080.150.010.77−0.060.170.050.27−0.24<0.001
PCT750μm0.140.01−0.0040.93−0.080.090.110.03−0.20<0.001
Table 4. Summary of previous studies on anterior segment structures in pediatric eyes.
Table 4. Summary of previous studies on anterior segment structures in pediatric eyes.
StudyCurrent StudyEdawaji B. S. A.
et al. [11]
Daniel M. C.
et al. [20]
Hashemi H.
et al. [21]
Yeter V.
et al. [22]
Subject number70922350683110
Age (years)82 day–154–166–183–6
Published Year 2021201820152015
ModalityAS-OCTHandheld OCTAS-OCTOpticalUBM
ALavailableNANAavailableavailable
SEavailableavailableavailableNAavailable
ACAavailableNANANAavailable
AODavailableavailableavailableNANA
TISAavailableavailableavailableNANA
PITavailableNANANANA
PCTavailableNANANAavailable
CCTNAavailableavailableavailableavailable
Remarks trabecular meshwork lengthtrabecular meshwork length and heightcentral ACDperipheral ACD
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bao, M.; Harada, R.; Kasai, Y.; Okabe, N.; Takahashi, A.; Kuleshov, C.; Shigemoto, Y.; Ooka, T.; Yokomichi, H.; Miyake, K.; et al. Anterior Chamber Configuration and Its Related Factors Among 8-Year-Old Children in the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155454

AMA Style

Bao M, Harada R, Kasai Y, Okabe N, Takahashi A, Kuleshov C, Shigemoto Y, Ooka T, Yokomichi H, Miyake K, et al. Anterior Chamber Configuration and Its Related Factors Among 8-Year-Old Children in the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(15):5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bao, Mingxue, Ryo Harada, Yuka Kasai, Natsuki Okabe, Airi Takahashi, Chio Kuleshov, Yumi Shigemoto, Tadao Ooka, Hiroshi Yokomichi, Kunio Miyake, and et al. 2025. "Anterior Chamber Configuration and Its Related Factors Among 8-Year-Old Children in the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 15: 5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155454

APA Style

Bao, M., Harada, R., Kasai, Y., Okabe, N., Takahashi, A., Kuleshov, C., Shigemoto, Y., Ooka, T., Yokomichi, H., Miyake, K., Kojima, R., Shinohara, R., Yui, H., Otawa, S., Kobayashi, A., Kushima, M., Yamagata, Z., Kashiwagi, K., & on behalf of The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group. (2025). Anterior Chamber Configuration and Its Related Factors Among 8-Year-Old Children in the Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(15), 5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop