Next Article in Journal
Possession of Injectable Epinephrine Among Children with Parent-Reported Food Allergies in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Cobb Angles Between 40 and 50 Degrees at the Late Stage of Skeletal Growth: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pseudoaneurysmectomy After Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture Repair: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

In Cardiogenic Shock, Overweight and Obesity Have the Lowest, Whereas Cachexia Has the Highest Mortality

by
Mohammad Reza Movahed
1,2,*,
Mehrdad Mahalleh
1,
Zahra Sadin
1 and
Mehrtash Hashemzadeh
2
1
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
2
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5275; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155275
Submission received: 21 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025

Abstract

Introduction: The obesity paradox has been observed in patients with cardiovascular disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether obesity has a protective effect in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock. Method: Using a large Nationwide Inpatient (NIS) sample database, we evaluated mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock based on weight categories in adults. Results: A total of 843,020 patients over age 18 had a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock in the database. We found that overweight and obesity had the lowest mortality using univariate or multivariate analysis (overweight mortality of 20.66% vs. obesity mortality of 26.6% vs. 34.8% of normal weights). In contrast, cachexia was associated with the highest mortality in univariate analysis (cachexia 40.4%). Using multivariate analysis adjusting for age, baseline characteristics, and comorbidities, these relations remained unchanged (cachexia MVOR: 1.13; CI: 1.21–1.13; p < 0.001; overweight MVOR: 0.52, CI: 0.43–0.65; p < 0.001; obesity MVOR: 0.76, CI: 0.73–0.79; p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, morbid obesity had similar mortality to patients with normal weight (morbid obesity MVOR: 0.99 CI 0.95–01.03; p = 0.6) Conclusions: We observe a partial obesity paradox in patients with cardiogenic shock, showing that being overweight, followed by obesity, has the lowest mortality, whereas cachexia has the highest mortality despite multivariate adjustment.
Keywords: obesity paradox; obesity; cardiogenic shock; shock; obesity; morbid obesity; cachexia; congestive heart failure obesity paradox; obesity; cardiogenic shock; shock; obesity; morbid obesity; cachexia; congestive heart failure

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Movahed, M.R.; Mahalleh, M.; Sadin, Z.; Hashemzadeh, M. In Cardiogenic Shock, Overweight and Obesity Have the Lowest, Whereas Cachexia Has the Highest Mortality. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155275

AMA Style

Movahed MR, Mahalleh M, Sadin Z, Hashemzadeh M. In Cardiogenic Shock, Overweight and Obesity Have the Lowest, Whereas Cachexia Has the Highest Mortality. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(15):5275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Movahed, Mohammad Reza, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Zahra Sadin, and Mehrtash Hashemzadeh. 2025. "In Cardiogenic Shock, Overweight and Obesity Have the Lowest, Whereas Cachexia Has the Highest Mortality" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 15: 5275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155275

APA Style

Movahed, M. R., Mahalleh, M., Sadin, Z., & Hashemzadeh, M. (2025). In Cardiogenic Shock, Overweight and Obesity Have the Lowest, Whereas Cachexia Has the Highest Mortality. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(15), 5275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop