Next Article in Journal
Association of Hepatocyte Growth Factor and Angiopoietin-2 with Systemic Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Is Personalized Mechanical Thrombectomy Based on Clot Characteristics Feasible? A Radiomics Model Using NCECT to Predict FPE in AIS Patients Undergoing Thromboaspiration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Photogrammetry in Spinal Assessment: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Clinical Methods

1
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of West Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania
2
Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4032; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124032
Submission received: 22 April 2025 / Revised: 3 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 6 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Spine mobility is essential for overall health and daily functioning. Accurate assessment of spinal mobility is necessary for diagnosing and managing orthopedic, neurological, and rheumatological disorders, particularly in patients experiencing lower back and thoracic pain. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of traditional clinical tests in comparison to the innovative photogrammetric 3D posture assessment for evaluating spinal mobility. Methods: A total of 20 patients from a medical clinic underwent tests to measure lumbar and thoracic spine mobility, including flexion, lateral incline, and axial rotation, using both conventional and 3D posture assessment methods. Results: We found strong correlations between investigated methods, which recommends photogrammetry as a reliable and effective tool for assessing posture in clinical practice. Furthermore, 3D posture assessment offers a faster approach (clinical evaluation: 2:59 ± 0.22 min vs. photogrammetry: 1:03 ± 0.01 min) and a more practical method for assessing spinal mobility, thereby enhancing the patient experience and providing clinicians with objective data for treatment planning. Conclusions: The study highlights the value of modern technologies in clinical assessment and therapeutic intervention, encouraging therapists to integrate photogrammetric methods into their daily practice to improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: spinal mobility; photogrammetry; clinical rehabilitation spinal mobility; photogrammetry; clinical rehabilitation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurjiu, N.-A.; Glazer, C.; Oravitan, M.; Pantea, C.; Avram, C. Photogrammetry in Spinal Assessment: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Clinical Methods. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124032

AMA Style

Jurjiu N-A, Glazer C, Oravitan M, Pantea C, Avram C. Photogrammetry in Spinal Assessment: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Clinical Methods. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(12):4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurjiu, Nicolae-Adrian, Ciprian Glazer, Mihaela Oravitan, Corina Pantea, and Claudiu Avram. 2025. "Photogrammetry in Spinal Assessment: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Clinical Methods" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 12: 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124032

APA Style

Jurjiu, N.-A., Glazer, C., Oravitan, M., Pantea, C., & Avram, C. (2025). Photogrammetry in Spinal Assessment: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Clinical Methods. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(12), 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop