Next Article in Journal
Incidence and Predictors of Urethral Stricture Following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Open Simple Prostatectomy: A 21-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Randomized, Cross over, Multicenter, Single-Blind Study Comparing Citicoline 500 mg/Homotaurine 50 mg/Vitamin B3 54 mg/Pyrroloquinoline Quinone 5 mg (Neuprozin Mito®) and Citicoline 800 mg (Cebrolux®) on Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG) and Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma with Well-Controlled Intraocular Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epidemiological Evidence on the Associations of Metal Exposure with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Among Elderly Women

by
Fahmida Rashid
1,†,
Khalid M. Khan
1,*,†,
Samyukthaa Saiprakash
2,
Giasuddin Ahmed
3,
Rasheda Sultana
1,
Faruque Parvez
4,
Zhahirul Islam
5 and
Md. Shiblur Rahaman
1,6,*
1
Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Texas, TX 77341, USA
2
College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, TX 77304, USA
3
Department of Biology and Chemistry, Texas A & M International University, Laredo, TX 78041, USA
4
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
5
Gut-Brain Axis Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division (IDD), Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
6
Department of Environmental Science and Disaster Management, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3776; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113776
Submission received: 22 March 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 28 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology & Public Health)

Abstract

:
Background: Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between heavy metals and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). This study compiled epidemiological evidence from research published over the past 11 years on the impact of metals on AD/ADRD in women. Women have unique risk factors for late onset of AD/ADRD, in addition to genetic factors, apolipoprotein E allele (APOE4), and longer life expectancy. Furthermore, women are twice likely as men to experience depression, which increases their risk of developing AD/ADRD. Our narrative review underscored the necessity of a sex-specific approach to address women’s vulnerability to AD/ADRD. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, NIOSH Toxline, and Scopus, were thoroughly searched to identify primary epidemiological studies on older women exposed to metals and published between 2014 to 2024. Results: We identified 34 epidemiological studies that met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed a complex interplay between environmental metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), manganese (Mn), selenium (Se), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) and the risk of AD/ADRD in women. Significant adverse effects were reported for Cu, Cd, As, Pb, and Mn while significant protective effects were found between Se, Fe, and Zn in blood and AD/ADRD among older women. However, some studies also reported no correlations. Conclusions: Overall, our review identified contrasting results regarding the effects of metals on AD/ADRD in women. Future studies should collect additional evidence to understanding the effects of heavy metals on AD/ADRD in women for developing preventive measures.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) are the most prevalent neurocognitive diseases and recognized as a pressing public health challenge worldwide. Currently, approximately 57 million people worldwide suffer from AD/ADRD [1,2] which will continue to increase in the coming years. In the United States (U.S.), more than 5.5 million people have AD/ADRD, a number projected to reach 8.5 million by the end of 2030 [3]. Alzheimer’s-related dementia (ADRD) burden varies by region. East Asia has the highest number of individuals with dementia (9.8 million), followed by Western Europe (7.5 million), South Asia (5.1 million), and North America (4.8 million) [4]. Surprisingly, high-income countries (HICs) tend to show higher rates of AD/ADRD prevalence. Recent trends indicate a significant increase in the incidence of dementia (mostly ADRD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Currently, 60–67% of people with dementia live in LMICs, and 71% of new diagnoses are expected to be from these LMICs [5,6]. LMICs in Asian countries, including India and China, are expected to show over 300% increase in people with dementia between 2001 and 2040, much higher than the high-income countries (100% increase) within the same timeframe [7,8].
Social, biological, and environmental risk factors are responsible for the growing concerns over AD/ADRD. Genomic factors that contribute to the likelihood of AD/ADRD include APOE4 [9]. At the same time, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between various social and environmental factors and ADRD [10]. For instance, higher educational levels support cognitive performance and lower the risk of dementia [11]. Furthermore, living in a green area, such as parks and gardens, has positive impacts on cognitive function [12]. Conversely, long-term exposure to air pollution has been associated with an increased risk of dementia [13]. Emerging research highlights the role of exposome factors, such as workplace environmental exposure [14] and heavy metals influencing dementia risk and contributing to health disparities [10]. Among environmental factors, metal exposure remains an understudied aspect of the exposome, particularly in older women. Metal exposure may play a significant role in increasing the risk of cognitive impairment, leading to AD/ADRD [1,10,15,16,17,18,19].
Among aging populations at risk of developing AD/ADRD, older women (over 50 years old) represent a particularly vulnerable group [20,21]. Several risk factors put women at higher risk. Women live longer than men, making them more likely to reach an age to develop AD/ADRD [22]. Additionally, women account for almost two-thirds of AD dementia cases [23]. Research has shown that over 65% of those diagnosed with late-onset dementia are women [24]. Furthermore, women are more likely to experience certain risk factors, such as a higher prevalence of depression [25], which is a known risk factor for ADRD [26]. The vulnerability of women is further exacerbated by historical and sociological circumstances, including their historically limited access to education in many developing countries [27,28]. Other factors, such as genetic predispositions and female-specific conditions including early menopause and sleep apnea, also make women highly susceptible to AD/ADRD [27,29]. Despite this increased susceptibility, much remains unknown about the precise effects of environmental chemicals, particularly heavy metal exposure, on AD/ADRD in older women. Metal exposure through food, soil, air, and drinking water is common in both developed and developing countries due to increased industrial activities and natural contamination (i.e., geogenic sources). In regions where industrial activities involve toxic metals, there are increased risks to nearby populations. Pollution not only directly affects populations but contaminates waterways and aquatic life, which is an essential food source utilized by these populations. Additionally, pollution affects vegetation that relies on these contaminated sources [30].
Highly toxic metals, especially lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As), along with essential elements such as manganese (Mn), selenium (Se), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) are associated with biological alterations that may increase the risk of AD/ADRD related symptoms [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. For instance, Pb affects several symptoms indicative of cognitive decline, including memory loss, decreased brain signaling, and a reduced capacity for learning [38]. Cd can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and contribute to inflammation, oxidative stress, and ultimately neuronal apoptosis, all of which are dysregulated processes in neurodegenerative conditions [15]. Exposure to Cd has been linked to dementia-related learning and memory impairments as well as mood disorders. Essential elements such as Fe, Cu, Zn, and Ca are necessary for brain development, neurotransmitter synthesis, immune system function, and cellular homeostasis [34]. Deficiencies or excesses of Mn, Se, and Mg may reduce brain functions, as these minerals play key roles in antioxidant processes and proper neuronal transmission [35,39,40]. Overall, an imbalance of any of these micronutrients and metals may lead to neurodegenerative diseases, including AD/ADRD. Maintaining the homeostasis of these metals is more crucial, particularly in older women. For example, Mn neurotoxicity is influenced by other trace metals, especially Fe, as they share common transport pathways. A deficiency in Fe can increase the Mn level [41], potentially leading to toxicity at even moderate doses. Since Fe deficiency is very common among women [42], this homeostasis interplay is particularly relevant in older women, as hormonal fluctuations and metabolic differences influence metal absorption and regulation [43].
Despite increasing research on cognitive impairment, dementia, and other AD/ADRD outcomes or symptoms, significant gaps remain in exploring how sex-specific factors such as genetic composition, hormonal alterations, metabolism of metals, and environmental factors can uniquely influence women. While some studies have explored the sex influence on cognitive function, very few specifically focus on women, particularly in relation to metal exposure. The existing research includes a very limited number of women AD participants compared to men. Additionally, many studies do not conduct comparative analysis, making it difficult to draw conclusion about sex-specific effects. Furthermore, most research is cross-sectional, making it difficult to establish causality between the metal exposure and cognitive impairment, especially in women; therefore, it is crucial to critically evaluate the current state of knowledge regarding the roles of both toxic and nutritional metals in either elevating or reducing the risk of AD/ADRD in women.
We thus conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the available epidemiological studies with the goal of improving our understanding of the effects of heavy metals on AD/ADRD among older women.

2. Methods

An extensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, NIOSH Toxline, and Scopus) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles from indexed journals on epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between heavy metals (e.g., Zn, Fe, Mg, Ca, Se, Pb, As, Mn, Cd, and Cu) and AD/ADRD. The time frame for selecting epidemiological articles was also restricted to within the past 11 years (i.e., January 2014–September 2024). Studies that were not written in English, not indexed, not available online, and non-peer-reviewed, such as manuscripts, reports, articles from conferences, or doctoral dissertations, were excluded from this review. Another major selection criterion was to include peer-reviewed epidemiological articles that reported AD/ADRD outcomes in women only or both male and female participants over 50 years of age. Studies were excluded if they did not involve AD/ADRD, dementia, and cognitive impairment; were not original research (e.g., reviews) or were abstracts; were animal trials; were male trials; or did not present sex-based results.
We used a combination of the following keywords: “humans” or “patients” or “sub-jects” or “participants” or “person” or “population” or “individuals” and “elderly” or “aged” and “women” or “female” and “heavy metals” or “trace elements” or “toxic metals” or “nutritional metals” or “lead (Pb)” or “cadmium (Cd)” or “arsenic (As)” or “manganese (Mn)” or “selenium (Se)” or “iron (Fe)” or “zinc (Zn)” or “copper (Cu)” or “magnesium (Mg)” or “calcium (Ca)” and “dementia” or “Alzheimer” or “Alzheimer’s related dementias” or “cognitive impairment” or “mild cognitive impairment” or “cognitive dysfunction”.
In total, 1899 articles were identified in the preliminary search. Next, 955 duplicates were removed, and 944 articles were screened by title and abstract. Then, 841 articles were excluded because they did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. Full-text screening of 103 articles resulted in the exclusion of 69 articles based on the following reasons: inappropriate publication type (n = 25), lack of metal exposure assessment (n = 20), absence of AD/ADRD outcomes or inappropriate population (n = 18), and non-English language (n = 6). Finally, 34 peer-reviewed and full-text published articles were included for analysis in this review. Figure 1 illustrates the search strategy for epidemiological studies and stepwise selection of articles for the current review.

3. Results

3.1. Adverse Effects of Metals on AD/ADRD Outcomes Among Women

3.1.1. Lead (Pb)

In this review, five articles were identified that described the adverse effects of Pb, and among them, some studies found that the relationship between Pb and cognitive function also had significant sex differences (Table 1). A study by Power et al. (2014) [17], conducted on women, identified long-term cumulative exposure to Pb to be associated with cognitive decline. In this cohort study, they measured bone Pb (micrograms Pb per gram bone mineral) among 584 women using a validated telephone-based cognitive assessment [17].
Another cohort study among 1148 individuals (55.23% women) by Liu et al. (2024) [44] identified a stronger positive association between blood Pb and cognitive impairment (CI) (OR= 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11–2.88, p = 0.016), with sex being significant. Older adults with CI were measured via the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score for cognitive assessment (lower score indicated poor cognitive function). Most CI individuals tended to be women (25.39%) compared to men (15.95%) [44]. Similarly, Qing et al. (2024) [16] found that blood and urinary Pb levels were significantly and inversely correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Overall, the sex difference was significant (p < 0.05) in Ying’s study. In another study, Fu et al. (2024) [45] addressed the dose–response relationship between blood Pb and a cognitive function test called the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The female group with a higher blood Pb level (2.09 µg/dL) was more likely to have worse performance than their male counterparts.
On the other hand, Fathabadi et al. (2018) [38] found a significantly higher blood lead level (BLL) among the AD patients (BLL, OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.09, p = 0.01).
Table 1. Summary of Epidemiological Studies.
Table 1. Summary of Epidemiological Studies.
Author and
Metal(s)
Geographical OriginAge (Mean Years ± SD)Sample Size (Female)
Study design: Cohort
Ashraf et al. (2019) [46],
Fe and Zn
United Kingdom77.5± 6.288 (48)
Giacconi et al. (2019) [47],
Cu and Zn
Italy77.5 ± 0.05179 (132)
Gong et al. (2021) [34],
Fe
United States 78 ± 8.63131 (1642)
Rembach et al. (2014) [48],
Zn
Australia 78.8 ± 8.61084(634)
Jinhui Yu et al. (2023) [49],
Se and Zn
China71.70 ± 6.381025 (548)
Lui H et al. (2021) [15],
Cd
China73.79 ± 5.921554 (994)
Liu Q et al. (2024) [44],
Pb
China 71.14 ± 5.781148 (634)
Power et al. (2014) [17],
Pb
United States 61 ± 6584 (584)
Min J et al. (2016) [50],
Cd
United States 74.5 ± 8.364064 (2032)
Peng Q et al. (2017) [51],
Cd
United States 71.1 ± 0.242023 (971)
Study design: Case–control
Koseoglu
et al. (2021) [52],
As and Se
Turkey75.8 ± 5.880 (47)
Cardoso et al. (2017) [53],
Se
Australia82.1 ± 1.2209 (40)
Fathabadi et al. (2018) [38],
Pb
Iran68.65 ± 7.3981 (36)
Gu et al. (2021) [54]
As and Se
China71.8 ± 6.51066 (583)
Huang et al. (2022) [55],
Cd
United States ≥60 years old1918 (964)
Jouini et al. (2021) [56],
Fe and Ca
Tunisia70.538 ± 7.57167 (102)
Zhang et al. (2022) [18], Cu and CdChina67 ± 4.01667 (956)
Koc et al. (2015) [57],
Cu, Mn, Mg, Se, and Mg
Turkey77.66 ± 9.2878 (39)
Li H et al. (2018) [58],
Cd
United States 69.14 ± 10.912068 (1126)
Park et al. (2019) [59],
Fe
Korea 69.2 ± 8.4 127 (100)
Rozzini et al. (2018) [60],
Cu
Italy 77.1 ± 7.6 108 (58)
Socha et al. (2021) [36],
Cu, Se, and Zn
Poland67.0 ± 7.9170 (126)
Sternberg et al. (2017) [61],
Fe
United states70.6 ± 7.485 (36)
Xu et al. (2018) [62],
Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Se
England 78.2 ± 1.384 (39)
Yang et al. (2018) [33],
As and Se
China76.48 ± 7.41434 (244)
Study design: Cross-sectional
Cheng et al. (2022) [63],
Se
China78.5 ± 10.683813 (1925)
Duhan et al. (2024) [64],
Se and Cu
China72.4 ± 5.3416 (208)
Hare et al. (2016) [65],
Mn
Australia78 ± 8.6100 (436)
Nascimento et al. (2021) [35],
Se
Brazil 74.41 ± 7.1102 (70)
Wang et al. (2024) [66],
Se and Cd
United States 69.16 ± 6.681460 (675)
Wang X et al. (2021) [19],
As
China 57.0 ± 11.51556 (754)
Wang et al. (2024) [67],
As, Fe, and Zn
China 97.10 ± 4.92408 (322)
Qing et al. (2024) [16],
Pb and Cd
China 70.55 ± 6.3836 (485)
Zixuan Fu et al. (2024) [45], Pb, Cu, and Cd United States ≥60811 (421)

3.1.2. Cadmium (Cd)

In this review, we found nine studies that showed a positive association (indicating negative effects of a specific metal) between Cd exposure and AD/ADRD outcomes (Table 1). A case–control study performed by Huang et al. (2022) [55] with a total of 1918 participants (964 female and 467 low cognitive performance) found high-level blood Cd associated with a higher risk of CI after adjusting for age and gender (OR = 1.558, 95% CI:1.144–2.123; p = 0.006). However, they did not find any sex-specific risk differences [55]. Similarly, a significant positive correlation between plasma Cd (OR = 1.456, 95% CI: 1.003–2.114, p = 0.048) and the risk of CI was reported by Zhang et al. (2022) in a cross-sectional study where women showed higher CI [18]. In China, a prospective cohort study conducted by Liu H et al. (2021) found higher blood Cd significantly associated with greater cognitive decline, with women showing higher risk that was statistically significant (994 were female participants among 1554 total study participants) [15]. A case–control study by Li H et al. (2018) involving 2068 American participants (1126 female) found that a higher level of blood Cd was associated with worse cognitive function (β = −0.14, 95% CI −0.25 to –0.03; p < 0.0001) [58].
Min et al. (2016) conducted a cohort study with 4064 participants (50% female participants), where female participants had higher blood Cd levels, and high blood Cd was significantly associated with the risk of AD mortality [50]. Similar findings were reported in another cohort study conducted by Peng et al. (2017) [51].

3.1.3. Arsenic (As)

In this review, four articles were identified showing positive relationships (adverse effects) between As exposure and AD/ADRD-related outcomes (Table 1). A case–control study conducted in Turkey among 80 individuals (more than 50% female participants) showed a significant positive correlation between As levels (in both hair and nail samples) and AD outcomes (p < 0.001), although the researchers did not find any association between As levels and sex [52]. Another case–control study involving 1066 Chinese older adults revealed that As exposure was associated with an increased risk of cognitive dysfunction (As, OR = 2.06 (95% CI: 1.30–3.25; p = 0.002) as evaluated by MMSE, and sex was not associated with blood As concentration [54].
Wang and colleagues investigated the association between hair As exposure and cognitive impairment among 1556 individuals (more than half women participants) and assessed participants’ cognitive function using MMSE. They showed that female participants had a significantly higher prevalence of CI [19]. A case–control study conducted by Yang et al. (2018) demonstrated that female participants were more likely to develop and significantly at risk for developing AD compared to the male participants [33]. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, along with the MMSE, was used to assess cognitive function. This study also reported that urinary As is associated with the increased risk of AD [33].

3.1.4. Multiple Metals (Adverse Effects and/or No Effects)

In this review, it was found that several papers examined the effects of more than one metal on AD/ADRD in the same sample of participants (Table 2).
Cu has been consistently associated with AD progression. Rozzini et al. (2018) [60], in a case–control study conducted among 108 Italian participants (58 females), reported female AD patients with MCI and dementia had higher total serum Cu levels compared to male participants (1147.7 µg/L ± 200.4 vs. 1060.2 µg/L ± 219.0; p = 0.016) [60]. In another study, Cu showed a positive correlation with the risk of cognitive performance (OR = 1.519, 95% CI: 1.050–2.197, p = 0.026). Additionally, the author mentioned participants with CI tended to be women (p< 0.001) [18].
Duan et al. (2024) found that higher levels of Ca were associated with lower cognitive function (β = −0.67, 95% CI −1.26 to –0.8; p = 0.25) [64]. Socha et al. (2021) [36] investigated if Cu or the Cu/Zn molar ratio had any effects on AD patients. In this case–control study, they found a non-significant higher level of Cu among women AD participants (1.07 ± 0.23 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18). Additionally, the Cu/Zn molar ratio was significantly higher among females with AD (1.59 ± 0.45 in females versus 1.31 ± 0.48 in males; p < 0.001) [36]. Although Mn is an essential element, elevated levels have been linked to cognitive dysfunction. Koc et al. (2015) observed significantly higher hair Mn levels in AD patients compared to healthy controls, though no direct sex differences were noted [57]. However, the unique susceptibility of women to neurotoxic effects due to differences in Mn metabolism and hormonal regulation remains an area requiring further exploration [68]. Dysregulated Ca homeostasis has been implicated in neurodegenerative processes associated with AD. Wang et al. (2024) [67] demonstrated a positive correlation between plasma Ca levels and cognitive impairment risk, though no significant association was observed in women specifically. Despite this, previous research indicated that Ca dysregulation, potentially influenced by estrogen deficiency postmenopause, could uniquely affect women’s neural Ca signaling pathways, amplifying their vulnerability to AD-related cognitive decline [67,69].
Zn, primarily considered a nutritional metal, is found in higher amounts among AD patients. Yu et al. (2023) reported that a higher whole-blood Zn level increased the risk of MCI (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.131–3.101; p = 0.015), especially among females [49]. Similarly, Ashraf et al. (2019) [46] reported higher Zn levels in AD patients. However, they did not report any sex-based comparison [46]. Two studies found that a high level of Se was associated with increased risk of CI (OR = 1.947, 95% CI 1.20–3.17; p = 0.007) [54] and AD (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.13–4.81; p < 0.05) [33].
Park et al. (2019) conducted a retrospective observational study in Korea among 127 participants to observe the effects of Fe on AD progression. The authors reported higher plasma Fe levels in the motor cortex among AD patients [59]. Two epidemiological studies examined Mg to observe its effects on AD/ADRD, but they did not find any correlation [57,62].

3.2. Beneficial Effects of Metals on AD/ADRD Outcomes Among Women

3.2.1. Zinc (Zn)

Several studies have discussed the relationship between Zn and AD/ADRD (Table 3). Giacconi et al. (2019) [47] and Koc et al. (2015) [57] found that overall Zn levels were significantly lower among AD patients compared to the healthy group, although no sex-specific differences were noted. Similarly, in a cross-sectional study among 408 participants, Wang et al. (2024) [67] reported a negative correlation between Zn and the risk of CI.
Rembach et al. (2014) [48], in a longitudinal prospective Australian cohort study, reported serum Zn to be non-significantly lower in women (11.910 ± 2413; vs. 12.706 ± 3.332; p = 0.073). The same research also found lower MMSE scores among AD patients compared to the healthy group (p < 0.001). Socha et al. (2021) [36] conducted a case–control study in Poland with 170 participants and reported significantly lower serum Zn levels in AD patients. Notably, female AD patients had even lower Zn levels than men (0.71 ± 0.14 vs. 0.84 ± 0.61 male; p < 0.05). Xu Jingshu et al. (2018) conducted a case–control study in England, which reported non-significantly lower levels of serum Zn among the female participants [62].

3.2.2. Selenium (Se)

The relationship between AD/ADRD and cognitive function with Se level has been widely assessed because of its significant effects on brain homeostasis maintenance [69]. Several epidemiological studies have examined Se level with respect to AD/ADRD and cognitive function, providing insight into its sex-specific outcomes (Table 3). Cardoso et al. (2017) [53] and Koc et al. (2015) [57] conducted case–control studies. Both studies reported no significant sex differences as far as Se levels were concerned, although the overall reduction in Se levels in AD patients indicated a possible protective role (p < 0.005). Wang et al. (2024) [66] and Duan et al. (2024) [64] performed two cross-sectional studies among 1460 and 406 participants, respectively. Both studies found protective effects of Se on cognitive function (β = 0.049, 95% CI: 0.022, 0.076; p < 0.05), (β = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.55; p = 0.007); however, neither study included any sex-based comparison to detect the Se level among male and female AD patients.
Cheng et al. (2022) [63] examined the association between urinary Se levels and cognitive performance in a large cross-sectional study of 3814 individuals in China that included 1925 female participants. Se levels were positively associated with MMSE scores in both single-element (β = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.01–0.52) and multi-element models (β = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.02–0.60) after covariate adjustment. Women showed significantly lower MMSE scores (p < 0.001) compared to males [63], and Yu et al. (2023) [49] provided further evidence of sex-specific vulnerabilities. In their cohort study of 1025 participants in China, lower Se levels were observed in individuals with MCI, with a significant association identified in women (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.193-0.591; p < 0.05) [49].
In a case–control study from Poland, Socha et al. (2021) [36] provided one of the few studies with explicit sex comparisons. They reported significantly lower serum Se levels in AD patients, with female AD patients exhibiting even lower levels than males (female: 68.8 ± 19.8; male: 69.5 ± 17.9; p < 0.05) [36].

3.2.3. Multiple Metals (Beneficial Effects)

Our review found several epidemiological investigations examining the effects of more than one metal on AD/ADRD in the same population (Table 3). For instance, Xu et al. (2018) [62] conducted a case–control study in England reporting a non-significant lower serum Fe among women with AD/ADRD compared to men [62]. Ashraf et al. (2019) [46] identified lower plasma Fe levels in AD patients in a cohort study among 88 participants in the United Kingdom [46]. However, they did not perform any sex-based comparison. The findings of the study emphasize the importance of monitoring Fe levels in women, particularly during menopause, which may reduce the risk of AD and related cognitive impairment. Gong et al. (2021) [34] conducted a similar cohort study in Italy in a larger sample (3131 participants). They reported an inverse dose–response relationship between Fe and cognitive dysfunction [34]. Hare et al. (2016) [65] observed reduced serum Mn levels in AD patients (p < 0.05), with lower erythrocyte Mn levels trending among women [65].

4. Discussion

Evidence from various epidemiological studies demonstrated potential positive and negative effects of metals on AD/ADRD in women. Neutral effects of metals were also observed in several epidemiological investigations. Toxic metals such as As, Pb, Cu, and Cd were associated with increased risk of AD/ADRD in women. Higher Zn levels repeatedly and consistently showed protective effects against the development of AD/ADRD. Evidence of lower levels of Zn in female AD patients compared to their male counterparts indicated a possible role of Zn deficiency in elevating the risk of AD/ADRD-related outcomes in women. Higher Se levels also showed mostly positive impacts. Fe and Mn showed beneficial association with AD/ADRD outcomes, with women showing greater vulnerability to deficiencies. Surprisingly, some nutritional metals, such as Zn and Fe, also demonstrated detrimental effects on AD/ADRD because the effects of metals depend on the level of exposure [70].

4.1. Adverse Effects of Metal Exposure on AD/ADRD

Neurotoxic metal Pb is associated with various cognitive declines, including learning, memory, working memory, attention, and executive function [71,72,73,74]. In this review, we found significantly higher BLL among the AD patients [38]. However, higher BLL was demonstrated among men, indicating a possibly lower risk in women. Some factors may have influenced the findings in opposite directions, including the small sample size (n = 81), the case–control study design, and the demographic factors (diet, income, and other social stressors). Prolonged life exposure to Pb is well documented as a neurotoxin and linked to cognitive decline in later life [75], and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered an early stage of AD/ADRD [45].
Cd is a well-known toxic metal, and numerous researchers have studied its relationship with the etiology of AD/ADRD across the globe. Excessive amounts of Cd have been found in the liver, plasma, and brain tissue among AD patients [76,77,78]. In this review, several studies were identified that reported the adverse effects of Cd on AD/ADRD. Additionally, the effects on women were also reported. After adjusting for smoking status, women had significantly higher blood Cd compared to men [50]. Recent studies have also established a link between high Cd concentration and a decline in cognitive functions [16,45,66]. Although the majority of the studies found associations between Cd and CI, a case–control study among Taiwanese AD patients conducted by Yang et al. (2018) did not identify any association between Cd exposure and cognitive decline using propensity score matching [33]. Women are particularly vulnerable to the neurotoxicity of Cd based on hormonal and physiological factors. Reduced iron storage in women, especially post-menopausal women, enhances gastrointestinal Cd absorption, leading to enhanced body burden [79].
As is well studied for its neurotoxicity properties. Although sex differences were not uniformly observed across studies, some reported higher risk in female subjects [19,33]. Mechanistic pathways such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation caused by chronic As exposure may increase the risk among female populations. Previous studies showed that low levels of arsenic in water could be directly correlated with myocardial infarction risk. Furthermore, supportive vascular insufficiency and myocardial infarction can result in brain hypoperfusion, white matter lesions, and infarctions of the brain, leading to cognitive decline and eventually AD/ADRD [80].
Interestingly, a non-significant higher level of Cu and a significantly higher level of Cu/Zn molar ratio among women AD participants were reported by Socha et al. (2021) [36]. These findings are clinically important, as an elevated Cu/Zn ratio is recognized as a biomarker of oxidative stress [81]. Furthermore, disproportionately low Zn and elevated Cu may compromise the antioxidant functionality of various enzymes [82]. Women are more vulnerable to developing neurocognitive issues due to differences in antioxidant capacity and hormonal regulation [83,84,85].
A previous study reported that higher levels of Ca are associated with lower cognitive function [64]. The main mechanism may be attributed to the disparity between intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. High blood Ca2+ crosses the blood–brain barrier [86] and raises extracellular Ca2+, stimulating Ca-sensing receptors, augmenting Ca2+ entry [87], closing voltage-sensitive Ca channels, and raising membrane resistance [88]. This disrupts Ca2+ homeostasis, triggering neuronal death [89,90] and dementia lesions. Despite this, previous research indicated that Ca dysregulation, potentially influenced by estrogen deficiency post menopause, could uniquely affect women’s neural Ca signaling pathways, amplifying their vulnerability to AD-related cognitive decline [91].
Although Mn is an essential element, elevated levels have been linked to cognitive dysfunction. However, the unique susceptibility of women to neurotoxic effects due to differences in Mn metabolism and hormonal regulation remains an area requiring further exploration [68].
While Zn is an essential micronutrient, excessive Zn, particularly at whole-blood concentrations, can potentially be detrimental to women with MCI and AD [46,49]. This may be due to sex-specific differences in hormonal homeostasis, metal transport, and neuroinflammation [92,93]. Higher plasma Fe levels in the motor cortex among AD patients was reported by a study conducted by Park et al. (2019) [59]. However, several studies highlighted Fe accumulation as an emerging biomarker and a potential modulator of disease progression in various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, especially among women [94,95,96,97].

4.2. Neuroprotective and Essential Roles of Metals

As the data indicate, women generally have lower levels of Zn. Consequently, the prevalence of AD was found to be higher among Zn-deficient women [98], and they tend to show more CI than men [99]. One possible reason for the low-Zn status is that women tend to eat less meat, which is rich in Zn and quickly absorbed by the body, and prefer foods like beans, which contain substances that can reduce the body’s ability to absorb Zn [100]. Additionally, women are more sensitive to Zn deficiency due to the effects of the female hormone estrogen [101].
Our review highlights the significantly lower serum Se levels in AD patients, with female AD patients exhibiting even lower levels than males [36]. Se levels were shown to be positively associated with MMSE scores and found a dose–response relationship between urinary Se and MMSE score and cognitive performance. Significantly lower MMSE scores were found in women, and these findings underscore more cognitive decline in women [63], possibly due to the differences in Se metabolism between men and women [69]. Results suggest that women may be disproportionately affected by Se deficiency, potentially contributing to their heightened risk of developing AD/ADRD. Previous studies have shown Se levels to be positively correlated with cognitive function, and a deficiency in Se can result in cognitive impairment [102]. Overall, the findings indicate that women may be more vulnerable to Se deficiency, which eventually increases the risk of AD/ADRD-related outcomes among them [103,104].
Our review identified lower plasma Fe levels in AD patients [46]. Gong et al. (2021) reported an inverse dose–response relationship between Fe and cognitive dysfunction, i.e., indicating CI increased as serum Fe level decreased [34]. A negative correlation between Fe and CI was also reported in a cross-sectional study in China [67]. Neither of these studies showed any sex-specific findings. The findings of the study emphasize the importance of monitoring Fe levels in women, particularly during menopause, which may reduce the risk of AD and related cognitive impairment.
A previous study showed low levels of erythrocyte Mn in women AD patients [65]. This suggests that Mn homeostasis might interact with sex-specific biological factors, such as the role of estrogens in metal transport and antioxidant defenses.

4.3. Women’s Vulnerability in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases

Various studies suggested a link between specific metal exposures and neurodegenerative diseases. However, there is only a little evidence on the effect of sex on the risk of metal-induced neurodegenerative diseases as reported in the current literature. A recent study conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to analyze epidemiological evidence of associations between metal exposure and Parkinson’s disease [105]. Similarly, associations were observed between Mn accumulation and Mg, AD, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [106]. In the case of ALS, metal exposure was highlighted in several studies as a potential risk factor. For instance, in an ecological study of 62 ALS patients, copper (Cu) was found to be directly correlated with ALS in both sexes [107]. An interesting observation of the study was a higher correlation in women compared to men (0.78 vs. 0.60). In another case–control study conducted in New England (N = 109) from 1993 to 1996, both blood and bone lead were linked to ALS, although this study did not show any effects of sex [108]. In a multicenter prospective cohort Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), As, Cd, Co, Cu, W, U, and Zn were individually associated with dementia, although no significant differences between men and women were reported [109]. Even though very little evidence of metal-induced neurodegenerative diseases were found in the literature, scientists indicated specific mechanisms that could put women at higher risk when exposed to metals. One possible mechanism is the stronger immune system of women than men, which may result in higher accumulation of amyloid plaques, one potential risk factor of AD/ADRD [110]. Other possible mechanisms of the neurotoxicity of metals, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, activation of microglial cells and inflammation, or promotion of α-synuclein aggregation and fibril formation, are often higher in older women, putting them into higher risk of neurodegenerative diseases [105,111,112].

4.4. Possible Mechanisms Linking Metal Exposure, Sex Differences, and Cognitive Impairment

Emerging evidence suggests that heavy metals such as Pb, Cd, As, Cu, and Fe induce cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases like AD/ADRD. While many studies cited in this review showed women’s vulnerability to metal exposure-induced ADRD, some studies could not ascertain that. Nonetheless, generally, women are much more prone to ADRD than their men counterparts as evident in the majority of the studies. The observed sex-specific vulnerability, particularly among women, may be influenced by differences in hormonal regulation, antioxidant capacity, and metal metabolism.

4.4.1. Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress

Chronic exposure to Pb, Cd, and As generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to neurotoxicity, which is a primary contributor to cognitive impairment in older adults [113]. Additionally, an imbalanced Cu/Zn molar ratio has been associated with oxidative stress, contributing to AD. Several studies presented in this review provide evidence to support that relatively poor antioxidant defense may be a possible mechanism that puts older women at a higher risk of getting AD/ADRD. Furthermore, estrogen has a neuroprotective role that declines with age, making post-menopausal women more susceptible to oxidative damage [114].

4.4.2. Hormonal Influence on Metal Metabolism

Sex hormones such as estrogen impact the transport and storage of essential metals like Fe, Cu, Zn, and Se [115,116,117]. However, declining levels of estrogen with increasing age may have a negative effect on body’s ability to regulate these metals, which may lead to metal accumulation or deficiency. Cd disrupts endocrine function, and by mimicking estrogenic activity, it may contribute to greater Cd retention in women, worsening neurotoxic effects [118]. Similarly, since estrogen influences Mn and Se levels [117,119], lower levels of estrogen with aging may affect the essential metals in the body. As a result, deficiencies in these metals disproportionately affect cognitive function, more likely in females (Figure 2).

4.4.3. Inflammatory Pathways and Neurodegeneration

Pb-, Cd-, and As-induced toxicity, among others, triggers inflammatory cascade, contributing to neuronal death, which is a hallmark feature of AD pathology [10]. Due to aging and lower levels of estrogen, elderly women may have a higher baseline level of inflammation that could explain their increased susceptibility to metal-induced cognitive decline.

4.4.4. Metal-Induced Protein Aggregation

Abnormal protein aggregation, particularly of β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau, has been implicated in AD pathology. Metal ions of Cu, Fe, and Zn can interact with Aβ peptides, promoting aggregation and plaque formation [120]. Some of the studies, presented in this review showed a positive correlation between an increased Cu/Zn molar ratio and AD in elderly women, which may be due to the disrupted metal homeostasis and its putative contribution to the Aβ peptides aggregation and plaque formation. Moreover, women are more susceptible to AD if they have elevated plasma levels of Fe due to hormonal influences on iron metabolism.

4.4.5. Potential Protective Roles of Zn and Se

While heavy metal accumulation may result in neurotoxicity, deficiencies in essential trace elements like Zn and Se have also been implicated in cognitive decline. Zn plays a crucial role in synaptic plasticity neuronal signaling, and neuroprotection and its deficiency leads to the development of neurodegenerative disease, including AD [121] On the other hand, Se is involved in antioxidant defense and brain function, and a lower level of Se has been strongly linked to AD [53,122]. Aging women are prone to these trace metal deficiencies due to the combination of hormonal changes, lower absorption rates, higher oxidative stress, dietary differences, chronic inflammation, and gut health issues [123]. These factors, therefore, may contribute to women’s vulnerability to poor cognitive function, potentially leading to the development of AD.

4.5. Limitations

The current review encountered several methodological limitations, primarily due to weaknesses in the epidemiological design or sample size. Our inclusion criteria limited our selection to articles that were indexed, available online, and written in English. The research team was not equipped to review articles that are not in English. Furthermore, the majority of the AD/ADRD papers that can reach the largest possible audience across the globe are written in English. As a result, studies published in some other languages, such as Chinese, Spanish, or Portuguese, were not considered, which may have excluded important articles and narrowed the scope of our review.
Most of the studies included in our review were cross-sectional, with only a small number of cohort and case–control studies that met our selection criteria. Cross-sectional studies do not provide information about temporality; however, it is very unlikely that metal-induced health outcomes occurred before exposure to metals during adulthood. Another limitation was the small sample size observed in multiple studies, producing low statistical power for detecting the effect of high versus low exposure impact or for identifying differences between men and women regarding AD/ADRD outcomes. Additionally, our review did not focus on genetic factors that may put some women at higher risk of AD/ADRD. This was beyond the scope of the review.
Therefore, future investigations should consider prospective epidemiological designs with larger sample sizes to establish causality between metal exposure and AD/ADRD outcomes, particularly in women. Finally, the great diversity of biomarkers used to assess metal exposure (serum, plasma, whole blood, hair, urine, etc.) in various studies made it difficult to compare the results, making it challenging to draw inferences.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

Despite some methodological challenges, our review identified Zn and Fe as the potential neuroprotective agents for AD/ADRD-related outcomes. In contrast, Cd, Pb, and As primarily exhibited neurodegenerative effects in AD/ADRD patients. Se displayed both positive and negative effects. However, several studies presented contradictory information indicating that heavy metals could have protective, adverse, and/or no effects on neurocognition in older adults, particularly in older women. Moreover, only a few studies examined and published results based on sex (male vs. female), which posed a major challenge in our review. The interplay between these metals and their cumulative neurotoxic effects highlights the need for sex-specific research frameworks to address women’s unique susceptibilities. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing tailored interventions and prevention strategies targeting metal dysregulation in AD/ADRD. Therefore, we recommend large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies emphasizing sex differences to further our understanding of the role of metals in the development of AD/ADRD. The findings from larger epidemiological studies may help our policymakers and interventionists develop therapeutic or behavioral interventions for preventing the worsening of AD/ADRD symptoms in older women around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.R., and K.M.K.; methodology, F.R., S.S., R.S., and K.M.K.; software, F.R., and S.S.; validation, M.S.R., R.S., and K.M.K.; formal analysis, F.R., G.A., K.M.K., and M.S.R.; investigation, F.R., G.A., K.M.K., and M.S.R.; resources, G.A., K.M.K., Z.I., and M.S.R.; data curation, F.R., K.M.K., F.P., and Z.I.; writing—original draft preparation, F.R., and K.M.K.; writing—review and editing, K.M.K., G.A., Z.I., R.S., F.P., and M.S.R.; visualization, F.R., and M.S.R.; supervision, K.M.K., and M.S.R.; project administration, K.M.K., F.P., and M.S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was partially supported by an external grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R01ES032149. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH. It is also partially supported by an internal grant (University Research Grant) from Texas A&M International University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAlzheimer’s disease
ADLActivities of daily living scales
AFTAnimal Fluency Test
AIBLAustralian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing
AD/ADRDAlzheimer’s disease and related dementias
APOE4Apolipoprotein E4
BLLBlood lead level
CICognitive impaired
CNCognitive normal
CDRClinical Dementia Rating
CDR-SOBClinical Dementia Rating—Sum of Boxes
CERADConsortium to Establish and Registry for AD Test
CERAD-DRConsortium to Establish and Registry for AD Test—Delayed Recall
CERAD-WLConsortium to Establish and Registry for AD Test—Word Learning
CSFCerebrospinal fluid
DSSTDigit Symbol Substitution Test
DRTDelayed Recall Test
GDSGeriatric Depression Scale
HCHealthy control
HEHealthy elderly
HICsHigh-income countries
IRTItem response theory
LCPLow cognitive performance
LMICsLow- and middle-income countries
MCIMild cognitive impairment
MMSEThe Mini-Mental State Examination
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging of the brain
MoCAMontreal Cognitive Assessment
NHANESNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
NINCDSNational Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke
RCTsRandomized controlled trials
ROS Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. Ahmed, G.; Rahaman, M.S.; Perez, E.; Khan, K.M. Associations of Environmental Exposure to Arsenic, Manganese, Lead, and Cadmium with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Recent Evidence from Mechanistic Studies. J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nichols, E.; Steinmetz, J.D.; Vollset, S.E.; Fukutaki, K.; Chalek, J.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdoli, A.; Abualhasan, A.; Abu-Gharbieh, E.; Akram, T.T. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health 2022, 7, e105–e125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bott, N.T.; Sheckter, C.C.; Milstein, A.S. Dementia care, women’s health, and gender equity: The value of well-timed caregiver support. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 757–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alzheimer’s Research UK. Prevalence and Incidence of Dementia. Available online: https://www.dementiastatistics.org/about-dementia/prevalence-and-incidence/ (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  5. Cahill, S. WHO’s global action plan on the public health response to dementia: Some challenges and opportunities. Aging Ment. Health 2020, 24, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prince, M.; Albanese, E.; Guerchet, M.; Prina, M. World Alzheimer Report 2014. Dementia and Risk Reduction: An Analysis of Protective and Modifiable Risk Factors; Alzheimer’s Disease International: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferri, C.P.; Prince, M.; Brayne, C.; Brodaty, H.; Fratiglioni, L.; Ganguli, M.; Hall, K.; Hasegawa, K.; Hendrie, H.; Huang, Y. Global prevalence of dementia: A Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005, 366, 2112–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tran, T.A.; Mattap, S.M.; Warren, N.; Teng, J.H.J.; Duong, M.D.; Hoang, V.M.; Yasin, S.; Mohan, D. Caregiver burden among dementia caregivers in low-and middle-income countries in Asia: A systematic review. Aging Ment. Health 2025, 29, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wainberg, M.; Andrews, S.J.; Tripathy, S.J. Shared genetic risk loci between Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2023, 15, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bakulski, K.M.; Seo, Y.A.; Hickman, R.C.; Brandt, D.; Vadari, H.S.; Hu, H.; Park, S.K. Heavy metals exposure and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 76, 1215–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.-X.; MacDonald, S.W.; Dekhtyar, S.; Fratiglioni, L. Association of lifelong exposure to cognitive reserve-enhancing factors with dementia risk: A community-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Besser, L. Outdoor green space exposure and brain health measures related to Alzheimer’s disease: A rapid review. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e043456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, L.; Steenland, K.; Li, H.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Lyles, R.H.; Requia, W.J.; Ilango, S.D.; Chang, H.H.; Wingo, T. A national cohort study (2000–2018) of long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia in older adults in the United States. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adani, G.; Filippini, T.; Garuti, C.; Malavolti, M.; Vinceti, G.; Zamboni, G.; Tondelli, M.; Galli, C.; Costa, M.; Vinceti, M. Environmental risk factors for early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia and frontotemporal dementia: A case-control study in northern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, H.; Su, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Cheng, Y.; Lin, S.; Ding, L.; Liu, J.; Chen, C.; Unverzagt, F.W. Higher blood cadmium level is associated with greater cognitive decline in rural Chinese adults aged 65 or older. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 144072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qing, Y.; Zheng, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Du, J.; Li, Y. The impact of metals on cognitive impairment in the elderly and the mediating role of oxidative stress: A cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 286, 117152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Power, M.C.; Korrick, S.; Tchetgen, E.J.T.; Nie, L.H.; Grodstein, F.; Hu, H.; Weuve, J.; Schwartz, J.; Weisskopf, M.G. Lead exposure and rate of change in cognitive function in older women. Environ. Res. 2014, 129, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Xu, M.; Cai, J.; Wei, Y.; Lin, Y.; Mo, X.; Huang, S.; Liu, S.; Mo, C. Associations between plasma metals and cognitive function in people aged 60 and above. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 3126–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Zhou, L.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Xu, K.; Huang, Z.; He, M.; Shen, M.; Tang, B. Association of arsenic exposure and cognitive impairment: A population-based cross-sectional study in China. Neurotoxicology 2021, 82, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alzheimer’s Association. 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017, 13, 325–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mielke, M.M. Sex and gender differences in Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Psychiatr. Times 2018, 35, 14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Plassman, B.L.; Langa, K.M.; Fisher, G.G.; Heeringa, S.G.; Weir, D.R.; Ofstedal, M.B.; Burke, J.R.; Hurd, M.D.; Potter, G.G.; Rodgers, W.L. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: The aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology 2007, 29, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Beam, C.R.; Kaneshiro, C.; Jang, J.Y.; Reynolds, C.A.; Pedersen, N.L.; Gatz, M. Differences between women and men in incidence rates of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 64, 1077–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gilsanz, P.; Mayeda, E.R.; Glymour, M.M.; Quesenberry, C.P.; Mungas, D.M.; DeCarli, C.; Dean, A.; Whitmer, R.A. Female sex, early-onset hypertension, and risk of dementia. Neurology 2017, 89, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kessler, R.C.; McGonagle, K.A.; Swartz, M.; Blazer, D.G.; Nelson, C.B. Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. J. Affect. Disord. 1993, 29, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goveas, J.S.; Espeland, M.A.; Woods, N.F.; Wassertheil-Smoller, S.; Kotchen, J.M. Depressive symptoms and incidence of mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia in elderly women: The Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Karp, A.; Kåreholt, I.; Qiu, C.; Bellander, T.; Winblad, B.; Fratiglioni, L. Relation of education and occupation-based socioeconomic status to incident Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 159, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Russ, T.C.; Stamatakis, E.; Hamer, M.; Starr, J.M.; Kivimaeki, M.; Batty, G.D. Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for dementia death: Individual participant meta-analysis of 86 508 men and women from the UK. Br. J. Psychiatry 2013, 203, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rocca, W.A.; Grossardt, B.R.; Shuster, L.T. Oophorectomy, menopause, estrogen treatment, and cognitive aging: Clinical evidence for a window of opportunity. Brain Res. 2011, 1379, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mishra, S.; Singh, G.; Gupta, A.; Tiwari, R.K. Heavy metal/metalloid contamination: Their sources in environment and accumulation in food chain. In Heavy Metal Toxicity: Environmental Concerns, Remediation and Opportunities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 19–47. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gordon, S.; Lee, J.S.; Scott, T.M.; Bhupathiraju, S.; Ordovas, J.; Kelly, R.S.; Tucker, K.L.; Palacios, N. Metabolites and cognitive decline in a Puerto Rican cohort. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2024, 99, S345–S353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yadav, J.; Verma, A.K.; Ahmad, M.K.; Garg, R.K.; Shiuli; Mahdi, A.A.; Srivastava, S. Metals toxicity and its correlation with the gene expression in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 3245–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.-W.; Liou, S.-H.; Hsueh, Y.-M.; Lyu, W.-S.; Liu, C.-S.; Liu, H.-J.; Chung, M.-C.; Hung, P.-H.; Chung, C.-J. Risk of Alzheimer’s disease with metal concentrations in whole blood and urine: A case–control study using propensity score matching. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 356, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, Z.; Song, W.; Gu, M.; Zhou, X.; Tian, C. Association between serum iron concentrations and cognitive impairment in older adults aged 60 years and older: A dose-response analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nascimento, C.Q.d.; Barros-Neto, J.A.; Vieira, N.F.L.; Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Neves, S.J.F.; Lima, S.O. Selenium concentrations in elderly people with Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-sectional study with control group. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2021, 74, e20200984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Socha, K.; Klimiuk, K.; Naliwajko, S.K.; Soroczyńska, J.; Puścion-Jakubik, A.; Markiewicz-Żukowska, R.; Kochanowicz, J. Dietary habits, selenium, copper, zinc and total antioxidant status in serum in relation to cognitive functions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sukumaran, P.; Nascimento Da Conceicao, V.; Sun, Y.; Ahamad, N.; Saraiva, L.R.; Selvaraj, S.; Singh, B.B. Calcium signaling regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cells 2021, 10, 2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fathabadi, B.; Dehghanifiroozabadi, M.; Aaseth, J.; Sharifzadeh, G.; Nakhaee, S.; Rajabpour-Sanati, A.; Amirabadizadeh, A.; Mehrpour, O. Comparison of blood lead levels in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy people. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Dement. 2018, 33, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Botturi, A.; Ciappolino, V.; Delvecchio, G.; Boscutti, A.; Viscardi, B.; Brambilla, P. The role and the effect of magnesium in mental disorders: A systematic review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kornblith, E.; Casey, S.L.; Lobdell, D.T.; Colledge, M.A.; Bowler, R.M. Environmental exposure to manganese in air: Tremor, motor and cognitive symptom profiles. Neurotoxicology 2018, 64, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ye, Q.; Park, J.E.; Gugnani, K.; Betharia, S.; Pino-Figueroa, A.; Kim, J. Influence of iron metabolism on manganese transport and toxicity. Metallomics 2017, 9, 1028–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Coad, J.; Pedley, K. Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in women. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2014, 74, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, Q.; Jian, J.; Katz, S.; Abramson, S.B.; Huang, X. 17β-Estradiol inhibits iron hormone hepcidin through an estrogen responsive element half-site. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 3170–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Q.; Li, J.; Cheng, X.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Guo, X.; Li, H. APOE ε4 allele modifies the associations of toxic metals and their mixture with cognitive impairment among older adults. Environ. Res. 2024, 255, 119148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fu, Z.; Xu, X.; Cao, L.; Xiang, Q.; Gao, Q.; Duan, H.; Wang, S.; Zhou, L.; Yang, X. Single and joint exposure of Pb, Cd, Hg, Se, Cu, and Zn were associated with cognitive function of older adults. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ashraf, A.; Stosnach, H.; Parkes, H.G.; Hye, A.; Powell, J.; So, P.-W. Pattern of altered plasma elemental phosphorus, calcium, zinc, and iron in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Giacconi, R.; Giuli, C.; Casoli, T.; Balietti, M.; Costarelli, L.; Provinciali, M.; Basso, A.; Piacenza, F.; Postacchini, D.; Galeazzi, R. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease influence Zinc and Copper homeostasis. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2019, 55, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rembach, A.; Hare, D.J.; Doecke, J.D.; Burnham, S.C.; Volitakis, I.; Fowler, C.J.; Cherny, R.A.; McLean, C.; Grimm, R.; Martins, R. Decreased serum zinc is an effect of ageing and not Alzheimer’s disease. Metallomics 2014, 6, 1216–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, J.; He, Y.; Yu, X.; Gu, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, S.; Tao, F.; Sheng, J. Associations between mild cognitive impairment and whole blood zinc and selenium in the elderly cohort. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Blood cadmium levels and Alzheimer’s disease mortality risk in older US adults. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peng, Q.; Bakulski, K.M.; Nan, B.; Park, S.K. Cadmium and Alzheimer’s disease mortality in US adults: Updated evidence with a urinary biomarker and extended follow-up time. Environ. Res. 2017, 157, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koseoglu, E.; Kutuk, B.; Nalbantoglu, O.U.; Koseoglu, R.; Kendirci, M. Arsenic and selenium measurements in nail and hair show important relationships to Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 64, 126684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cardoso, B.R.; Hare, D.J.; Bush, A.I.; Li, Q.-X.; Fowler, C.J.; Masters, C.L.; Martins, R.N.; Ganio, K.; Lothian, A.; Mukherjee, S. Selenium levels in serum, red blood cells, and cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s disease patients: A report from the Australian Imaging, Biomarker & Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL). J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 57, 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gu, L.; Yu, J.; Fan, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, L.; Liu, K.; Wang, Q.; Chen, G.; Zhang, D.; Ma, Y. The association between trace elements exposure and the cognition in the elderly in China. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huang, G.; Ren, G. Interaction between ω-6 fatty acids intake and blood cadmium on the risk of low cognitive performance in older adults from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2014. BMC Geriatr. 2022, 22, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jouini, N.; Saied, Z.; Ben Sassi, S.; Nebli, F.; Messaoud, T.; Hentati, F.; Belal, S. Impacts of iron metabolism dysregulation on Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2021, 80, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koç, E.R.; Ilhan, A.; Aytürk, Z.; Acar, B.; Gürler, M.; Altuntaş, A.; Karapirli, M.; Bodur, A.S. A comparison of hair and serum trace elements in patients with Alzheimer disease and healthy participants. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 45, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Fu, Z.; Yan, M.; Wu, N.; Wu, H.; Yin, P. Associations between blood cadmium levels and cognitive function in a cross-sectional study of US adults aged 60 years or older. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e020533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, M.; Moon, Y.; Han, S.-H.; Moon, W.-J. Motor cortex hypointensity on susceptibility-weighted imaging: A potential imaging marker of iron accumulation in patients with cognitive impairment. Neuroradiology 2019, 61, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rozzini, L.; Lanfranchi, F.; Pilotto, A.; Catalani, S.; Gilberti, M.E.; Paganelli, M.; Apostoli, P.; Padovani, A. Serum non-ceruloplasmin non-albumin copper elevation in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: A case control study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 61, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sternberg, Z.; Hu, Z.; Sternberg, D.; Waseh, S.; Quinn, J.F.; Wild, K.; Jeffrey, K.; Zhao, L.; Garrick, M. Serum hepcidin levels, iron dyshomeostasis and cognitive loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Dis. 2017, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xu, J.; Church, S.J.; Patassini, S.; Begley, P.; Kellett, K.A.; Vardy, E.R.; Unwin, R.D.; Hooper, N.M.; Cooper, G.J. Plasma metals as potential biomarkers in dementia: A case–control study in patients with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Biometals 2018, 31, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cheng, B.-j.; Wang, J.; Meng, X.-l.; Sun, L.; Hu, B.; Li, H.-b.; Sheng, J.; Chen, G.-m.; Tao, F.-b.; Sun, Y.-h. The association between essential trace element mixture and cognitive function in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 231, 113182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Duan, L.; Su, L.; He, X.; Du, Y.; Duan, Y.; Xu, N.; Wu, R.; Zhu, Y.; Shao, R.; Unverzagt, F.W. Multi-element Exposure and Cognitive Function in Rural Elderly Chinese. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 1401–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hare, D.J.; Faux, N.G.; Roberts, B.R.; Volitakis, I.; Martins, R.N.; Bush, A.I. Lead and manganese levels in serum and erythrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: Results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing. Metallomics 2016, 8, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, N.; Guo, L.; Shi, M.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H.; Xu, X.Q. Association of single and combined effects of blood heavy metals with cognitive function in older adults of the United States: A cross-sectional study. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Yang, F.; Shang, K.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y. Associations between plasma metal elements and risk of cognitive impairment among Chinese older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2024, 16, 1353286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Torres-Rojas, C.; Jones, B.C. Sex differences in neurotoxicogenetics. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Varikasuvu, S.R.; Prasad, V.S.; Kothapalli, J.; Manne, M. Brain selenium in Alzheimer’s disease (BRAIN SEAD Study): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 189, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy metals: Toxicity and human health effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 153–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Unverzagt, F.W.; Monahan, P.O.; Moser, L.R.; Zhao, Q.; Carpenter, J.S.; Sledge, G.W.; Champion, V.L. The Indiana University telephone-based assessment of neuropsychological status: A new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2007, 13, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bandeen-Roche, K.; Glass, T.A.; Bolla, K.I.; Todd, A.C.; Schwartz, B.S. Cumulative lead dose and cognitive function in older adults. Epidemiology 2009, 20, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Weisskopf, M.G.; Proctor, S.P.; Wright, R.O.; Schwartz, J.; Spiro III, A.; Sparrow, D.; Nie, H.; Hu, H. Cumulative lead exposure and cognitive performance among elderly men. Epidemiology 2007, 18, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Khalil, N.; Morrow, L.A.; Needleman, H.; Talbott, E.O.; Wilson, J.W.; Cauley, J.A. Association of cumulative lead and neurocognitive function in an occupational cohort. Neuropsychology 2009, 23, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Deng, Y.; Lin, X.; Zhou, J.; Li, M.; Fu, Z.; Song, D. Concurrent serum lead levels and cognitive function in older adults. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1180782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Basun, H.; Forssell, L.; Wetterberg, L.; Winblad, B. Metals and trace elements in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neural Transm. Park. Dis. Dement. Sect. 1991, 3, 231–258. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lui, E.; Fisman, M.; Wong, C.; Diaz, F. Metals and the Liver in Alzheimer’s Disease An Investigation of Hepatic Zinc, Copper, Cadmium, and Metallothionein. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1990, 38, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Panayi, A.; Spyrou, N.; Iversen, B.; White, M.; Part, P. Determination of cadmium and zinc in Alzheimer’s brain tissue using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Neurol. Sci. 2002, 195, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Męcik-Kronenberg, T.; Kuć, A.; Kubik-Machura, D.; Kościelecka, K.; Radko, L. Interaction of Metals, Menopause and COVID-19—A Review of the Literature. Biology 2023, 12, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Monrad, M.; Ersbøll, A.K.; Sørensen, M.; Baastrup, R.; Hansen, B.; Gammelmark, A.; Tjønneland, A.; Overvad, K.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O. Low-level arsenic in drinking water and risk of incident myocardial infarction: A cohort study. Environ. Res. 2017, 154, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Malavolta, M.; Giacconi, R.; Piacenza, F.; Santarelli, L.; Cipriano, C.; Costarelli, L.; Tesei, S.; Pierpaoli, S.; Basso, A.; Galeazzi, R. Plasma copper/zinc ratio: An inflammatory/nutritional biomarker as predictor of all-cause mortality in elderly population. Biogerontology 2010, 11, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Osredkar, J.; Sustar, N. Copper and zinc, biological role and significance of copper/zinc imbalance. J. Clin. Toxicol. S 2011, 3, 0495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Burmistrov, D.E.; Gudkov, S.V.; Franceschi, C.; Vedunova, M.V. Sex as a determinant of age-related changes in the brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pinares-Garcia, P.; Stratikopoulos, M.; Zagato, A.; Loke, H.; Lee, J. Sex: A significant risk factor for neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sherwin, B.B.; Henry, J.F. Brain aging modulates the neuroprotective effects of estrogen on selective aspects of cognition in women: A critical review. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2008, 29, 88–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Joborn, C.; Hetta, J.; Niklasson, F.; Rastad, J.; Wide, L.; Ågren, H.; Åkerström, G.; Ljunghall, S. Cerebrospinal fluid calcium, parathyroid hormone, and monoamine and purine metabolites and the blood-brain barrier function in primary hyperparathyroidism. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1991, 16, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Breitwieser, G.E. Calcium sensing receptors and calcium oscillations: Calcium as a first messenger. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2006, 73, 85–114. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tsien, R.W.; Wheeler, D.B. Voltage-gated calcium channels. In Calcium as a Cellular Regulator; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 171–199. [Google Scholar]
  89. Limbrick Jr, D.; Sombati, S.; DeLorenzo, R. Calcium influx constitutes the ionic basis for the maintenance of glutamate-induced extended neuronal depolarization associated with hippocampal neuronal death. Cell Calcium 2003, 33, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tymianski, M.; Tator, C.H. Normal and abnormal calcium homeostasis in neurons: A basis for the pathophysiology of traumatic and ischemic central nervous system injury. Neurosurgery 1996, 38, 1176–1195. [Google Scholar]
  91. Park, S.; Kang, S.; Kim, D.S. Severe calcium deficiency increased visceral fat accumulation, down-regulating genes associated with fat oxidation, and increased insulin resistance while elevating serum parathyroid hormone in estrogen-deficient rats. Nutr. Res. 2020, 73, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, T.M.; Sun, D.; Leung, M.-K.; Chu, L.-W.; Keysers, C. Neural activities during affective processing in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wei, F.; Wang, D.; Li, H.; Xia, P.; Ran, Y.; You, J. Toxicogenomics provides insights to toxicity pathways of neonicotinoids to aquatic insect, Chironomus dilutus. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 260, 114011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Moon, Y.; Han, S.-H.; Moon, W.-J. Patterns of brain iron accumulation in vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s dementia using quantitative susceptibility mapping imaging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 51, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Park, M.; Moon, W.-J.; Moon, Y.; Choi, J.W.; Han, S.-H.; Wang, Y. Region-specific susceptibility change in cognitively impaired patients with diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ward, R.J.; Zucca, F.A.; Duyn, J.H.; Crichton, R.R.; Zecca, L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. McClung, J.P.; Murray-Kolb, L.E. Iron nutrition and premenopausal women: Effects of poor iron status on physical and neuropsychological performance. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2013, 33, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Luchsinger, J.A.; Palta, P.; Rippon, B.; Soto, L.; Ceballos, F.; Pardo, M.; Laing, K.; Igwe, K.; Johnson, A.; Tomljanovic, Z. Sex differences in in vivo Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology in late middle-aged Hispanics. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 74, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Au, B.; Dale-McGrath, S.; Tierney, M.C. Sex differences in the prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 35, 176–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tang, F.; Chi, I.; Dong, X. Sex differences in the prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment: Does immigration matter? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2019, 67, S513–S518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sussman, D.; Smith, L.M.; Anderson, M.E.; Duniho, S.; Hunter, J.H.; Kostner, H.; Miyamoto, J.B.; Nesterova, A.; Westendorf, L.; Van Epps, H.A. SGN–LIV1A: A novel antibody–drug conjugate targeting LIV-1 for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2991–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cardoso, B.R.; Bandeira, V.S.; Jacob-Filho, W.; Cozzolino, S.M.F. Selenium status in elderly: Relation to cognitive decline. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cardoso, B.R.; Ong, T.P.; Jacob-Filho, W.; Jaluul, O.; Freitas, M.I.d.Á.; Cozzolino, S.M.F. Nutritional status of selenium in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Vural, H.; Demirin, H.; Kara, Y.; Eren, I.; Delibas, N. Alterations of plasma magnesium, copper, zinc, iron and selenium concentrations and some related erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2010, 24, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhao, Y.; Ray, A.; Portengen, L.; Vermeulen, R.; Peters, S. Metal exposure and risk of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2023, 192, 1207–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Baj, J.; Flieger, W.; Barbachowska, A.; Kowalska, B.; Flieger, M.; Forma, A.; Teresiński, G.; Portincasa, P.; Buszewicz, G.; Radzikowska-Büchner, E. Consequences of disturbing manganese homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Antonioni, A.; Govoni, V.; Brancaleoni, L.; Donà, A.; Granieri, E.; Bergamini, M.; Gerdol, R.; Pugliatti, M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and air pollutants in the province of Ferrara, Northern Italy: An ecological study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kamel, F.; Umbach, D.M.; Munsat, T.L.; Shefner, J.M.; Hu, H.; Sandler, D.P. Lead exposure and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Epidemiology 2002, 13, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Domingo-Relloso, A.; McGraw, K.E.; Heckbert, S.R.; Luchsinger, J.A.; Schilling, K.; Glabonjat, R.A.; Martinez-Morata, I.; Mayer, M.; Liu, Y.; Wood, A.C. Urinary metal levels, cognitive test performance, and dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e2448286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Eimer, W.A.; Kumar, D.K.V.; Shanmugam, N.K.N.; Rodriguez, A.S.; Mitchell, T.; Washicosky, K.J.; György, B.; Breakefield, X.O.; Tanzi, R.E.; Moir, R.D. Alzheimer’s disease-associated β-amyloid is rapidly seeded by herpesviridae to protect against brain infection. Neuron 2018, 99, 56–63.e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ko, D.; Rahman, F.; Schnabel, R.B.; Yin, X.; Benjamin, E.J.; Christophersen, I.E. Atrial fibrillation in women: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016, 13, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Semba, R.D.; Ferrucci, L.; Sun, K.; Walston, J.; Varadhan, R.; Guralnik, J.M.; Fried, L.P. Oxidative stress is associated with greater mortality in older women living in the community. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55, 1421–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Karri, V.; Schuhmacher, M.; Kumar, V. Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As and MeHg) as risk factors for cognitive dysfunction: A general review of metal mixture mechanism in brain. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zárate, S.; Stevnsner, T.; Gredilla, R. Role of estrogen and other sex hormones in brain aging. Neuroprotection and DNA repair. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mehta, S.W.; Eikum, R. Effect of estrogen on serum and tissue levels of copper and zinc. In Copper Bioavailability and Metabolism; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; pp. 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  116. Dacks, P.A. Estrogens Iron out the Details: A Novel Direct Pathway for Estrogen Control of Iron Homeostasis; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhou, X.; Smith, A.M.; Failla, M.L.; Hill, K.E.; Yu, Z. Estrogen status alters tissue distribution and metabolism of selenium in female rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Henson, M.C.; Chedrese, P.J. Endocrine disruption by cadmium, a common environmental toxicant with paradoxical effects on reproduction. Exp. Biol. Med. 2004, 229, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lee, E.-S.Y.; Yin, Z.; Milatovic, D.; Jiang, H.; Aschner, M. Estrogen and tamoxifen protect against Mn-induced toxicity in rat cortical primary cultures of neurons and astrocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 110, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Maynard, C.J.; Bush, A.I.; Masters, C.L.; Cappai, R.; Li, Q.X. Metals and amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2005, 86, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, R.; Wang, J.; Feng, J.; Cao, B. Zinc in cognitive impairment and aging. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhou, J.; Zhang, W.; Cao, Z.; Lian, S.; Li, J.; Nie, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, K.; He, J.; Liu, C. Association of selenium levels with neurodegenerative disease: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vural, Z.; Avery, A.; Kalogiros, D.I.; Coneyworth, L.J.; Welham, S.J. Trace mineral intake and deficiencies in older adults living in the community and institutions: A systematic review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the search strategy.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the search strategy.
Jcm 14 03776 g001
Figure 2. Pathway linking metal exposure to estrogen decline and ADRD risk in older women. Summarized possible mechanisms underlying the findings from the cited literature, suggesting that estrogen decline in older women increases their vulnerability to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, disruption of metal storage and metabolism, neurodegeneration, and impaired expression and aggregation of amyloid-beta. These effects are further exacerbated by elevated levels of toxic metals (As, Mn, Cu, Cd, and Pb) and decreased levels of essential metals (Se, Zn, and Fe) due to environmental exposure, ultimately contributing to ADRD in older women.
Figure 2. Pathway linking metal exposure to estrogen decline and ADRD risk in older women. Summarized possible mechanisms underlying the findings from the cited literature, suggesting that estrogen decline in older women increases their vulnerability to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, disruption of metal storage and metabolism, neurodegeneration, and impaired expression and aggregation of amyloid-beta. These effects are further exacerbated by elevated levels of toxic metals (As, Mn, Cu, Cd, and Pb) and decreased levels of essential metals (Se, Zn, and Fe) due to environmental exposure, ultimately contributing to ADRD in older women.
Jcm 14 03776 g002
Table 2. Epidemiological studies describing adverse effects and no effects of metals with AD/ADRD outcomes.
Table 2. Epidemiological studies describing adverse effects and no effects of metals with AD/ADRD outcomes.
ReferenceMetal(s)
and
Common Source
DiagnosisMajor Findings Related to Sex Differences
Ashraf et al. (2019) [46]Plasma Zn;
Food/
processed food
MMSE,
CDR, and
APOEε4-positive (n, %)
Zn was higher in AD. Sex was not statistically significant.
Duan et al. (2024) [64]Ca, Zn, Fe, and Pb;
Not mentioned
Nine standardized cognitive testsNo significant difference in sex.
Higher levels of Ca (p = 0.025) were associated with lower cognitive function. Zn, Fe, and Pb were not associated.
Koseoglu
et al. (2021) [52]
Nail and hair As and Se;
Ground water
MMSEAs and Se levels were not associated with sex. Positive correlation between As and Se levels within the AD group (p < 0.01).
Fathabadi et al. (2018) [38]Blood Pb;
Industrial pollutants
MMSEBLL was significantly higher in the patients group. Sex was not statistically significant. BLL was lower in women (p = 0.01).
Giacconi et al. (2019) [47]Plasma Cu;
Not mentioned
MMSENo significant differences were found for sex.
Significantly higher Cu levels among AD participants.
Gu et al. (2021) [54]Blood As and Se;
Not mentioned
MMSEAs and Se were associated with the increased risk of CI (p < 0.05). Sex was not statistically significant.
Huang et al. (2022) [55]Blood Cd;
Food
AFT,
CERAD, and
DSST
High-level Cd significantly was associated with low cognitive performance. Sex was not correlated.
Yu et al. (2023) [49]Whole-blood Zn;
Drinking water
ADL and
MMSE
Higher Zn increased the risk of MCI, especially among women (p < 0.05).
Jouini N et al. (2021) [56]CSF Fe;
Not mentioned
Brain imaging and
MMSE
Fe significantly higher in the AD group (p < 0.001). No difference was observed in women.
Zhang et al. (2022) [18]Plasma Cu and Cd;
Food, water, and industrial pollutants
MMSESignificant positive correlation between the risk of CI and Cu and Cd (p < 0.05). Sex was also statistically significant, and most CI participants were female.
Koc et al. (2015) [57]Hair Cu, Mn, and Mg;
Not mentioned
MMSENo significant variations based on sex. Significantly higher hair Cu and Mn levels found in AD patients (p < 0.05). Mg showed no effects on AD.
Lui H et al. (2021) [15]Blood Cd;
Air, water, soil, and food
Nine standardized cognitive testsHigher Cd levels were significantly associated with greater cognitive decline. Sex wasstatistically significant (p< 0.05).
Li H et al. (2018) [58]Blood Cd;
Not mentioned
CERAD, Word List Learning Test, the
CERAD Word List Recall Test, AFT, and DSST
Higher level of blood Cd was associated with worse cognitive function. Sex was significant (p< 0.05).
Liu Q et al. (2024) [44]Blood Pb;
Not mentioned
MMSESignificant association with Pb and CI (p < 0.05). Sex was significant (p < 0.001), and most CI individuals tended to be women.
Power et al. (2014) [17]Bone Pb;
Not mentioned
Telephone-based cognitive assessmentLong-term cumulative Pb exposure weakly associated with faster cognitive decline among women.
Min J et al. (2016) [50]Blood Cd;
Air and industrial pollutants
NHANES (1999–2004)Female participants (0.50 μg/L) had higher blood Cd levels. Significant association between high Cd levels and risk of AD mortality (p = 0.0684).
Wang et al. (2024) [66]Blood Cd;
Air
CERAD, Word Learning Test, AFT, and DSSTHigher blood Cd was associated with lower cognitive scores. Women group did not show any association.
Park et al. (2019) [59]Brain Fe;
Not mentioned
CDR, GDS, MMSE, and
brain MRI
In the motor cortex, there was higher Fe among AD patients. No difference was observed in women.
Peng Q et al. (2017) [51]Blood Cd;
Not mentioned
NHANES 1999–2006Women (0.52 ng/mL) had significantly higher blood Cd level. Increased blood Cd was associated with AD mortality (p = 0.04).
Rozzini et al. (2018) [60]Serum Cu;
Not mentioned
MMSEHigher Cu in MCI and dementia was due to AD (p < 0.0001). Women showed higher total Cu levels in both groups.
Socha et al. (2021) [36]Serum Cu and Zn;
Food
MMSEThe Cu/Zn molar ratio was significantly higher among women with AD.
Sternberg et al. (2017) [61]Serum Fe;
Not mentioned
MMSE, CDR, CDR-SOB, neuroimaging, and clinical dataFe among AD patients was significantly higher (50%) compared to controls (p = 0.004). No difference was observed in women.
Wang et al. (2021) [19]Hair As;
Environment
MMSEWomen had a significantly higher prevalence of CI. Positive correlation between As and CI (OR= 1.84, p < 0.05).
Wang et al. (2024) [67]Plasma Ca;
Environment
MMSEPlasma Ca was positively correlated with CI risk. Women group did not show any association.
Qing et al. (2024) [16]Blood Bb and urinary Cd and Pb;
Food
MoCAPb and Cd levels were significantly correlated with MoCA score. Sex was significant (p < 0.05), but women group did not show any association.
Yang et al. (2018) [33]Whole-blood Se and urine As;
Drinking water
CDR and
MMSE
Women were significantly more likely to have AD. Significant association with both Se and As with AD risk (OR = 1.9, p < 0.05).
Fu et al. (2024) [45]Blood Pb, Cd, and Cu;
Air, water, and food
IRT, DRT, AFT, and DSSTHigh levels of Pb, Cd, and Cu were correlated with cognitive function. Female group had higher blood Pb level (2.09 µg/dL).
Table 3. Epidemiological studies describing the beneficial effects of metals with AD/ADRD outcomes.
Table 3. Epidemiological studies describing the beneficial effects of metals with AD/ADRD outcomes.
ReferenceMetal(s)
and
Common Source
DiagnosisMajor Findings Related to Sex Differences
Ashraf et al. (2019) [46]Plasma Fe;
Food/processed food
MMSE,
CDR, and
APOEε4-positive (n, %)
Fe was lower in AD. Sex was not statistically significant.
Cardoso et al. (2017) [53]Erythrocytes, serum, and CSF Se;
Not mentioned
GDS and
MMSE
Erythrocyte Se levels were significantly lower in AD (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for sex.
Cheng et al. (2022) [63]Urine Se;
Food
MMSESe was positively associated with MMSE scores and cognitive function. Lower MMSE scores were found in women (p < 0.01).
Duan et al. (2024) [64]Se, Cu;
Not mentioned
Nine standardized cognitive testsNo significant difference in sex.
Higher levels of Se (p = 0.007) and Cu (p = 0.048) were associated with better cognitive function in the elderly.
Giacconi et al. (2019) [47]Plasma Zn;
Not mentioned
MMSENo significant differences were found for sex.
Significantly lower Zn among AD patients.
Gong et al. (2021) [34]Serum Fe;
Not mentioned
DSST, AF,
CERAD-DR, and CERAD-WL
Sex was not significant. Inverse dose–response relationship between serum Fe and CI.
Hare et al. (2016) [65]Serum and erythrocyte Mn;
Not mentioned
AIBLLower erythrocyte Mn (p = 0.053) in women. Serum Mn was decreased in AD compared to HC (p < 0.001).
Yu et al. (2023) [49]Whole-blood Se;
Drinking water
ADL and
MMSE
Lower Se in MCI, especially among women (p < 0.05).
Jouini N et al. (2021) [56]CSF Ca;
Not mentioned
Brain imaging and
MMSE
Ca was significantly lower in the AD group (p < 0.001). No difference was observed in women.
Koc et al. (2015) [57]Hair Se and Zn;
Not mentioned
MMSENo significant variations based on sex. Significantly lower hair Se and Zn levels were found in AD patients (p < 0.05).
Nascimento et al. (2021) [35]Plasma and erythrocyte Se;
Food
NINCDS criteria by geriatrician and
MMSE
Elderly with AD presented lower Se concentrations (p = 0.028). Odds ratio between men and women was 0.51.
Wang et al. (2024) [66]Blood Se;
Air
CERAD, Word Learning test, AFT, and DSSTSe has protective effect on cognitive function. Women group did not show any association.
Rembach et al. (2014) [48]Serum Zn;
Not mentioned
MMSENon-significant lower Zn levels in AD women. Serum Zn levels were significantly lower in AD patients compared to healthy controls (p = 0.001).
Socha et al. (2021) [36]Serum Se and Zn;
Food
MMSESignificantly lower serum Se and Zn in AD patients, with women showing even lower (p < 0.05).
Xu et al. (2018) [62]Serum Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Se;
Not mentioned
MMSEAmong female patients, none of the measured serum elements of serum Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, Se differed in their plasma concentrations between the AD and control groups. Low levels of Zn and Fe were found in women participants.
Wang et al. (2024) [67]Plasma Mn, Fe, and Zn;
Environment
MMSEPlasma Mn, Fe, and Zn levels were negatively correlated with CI risk. Women’s group did not show any association.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rashid, F.; Khan, K.M.; Saiprakash, S.; Ahmed, G.; Sultana, R.; Parvez, F.; Islam, Z.; Rahaman, M.S. Epidemiological Evidence on the Associations of Metal Exposure with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Among Elderly Women. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113776

AMA Style

Rashid F, Khan KM, Saiprakash S, Ahmed G, Sultana R, Parvez F, Islam Z, Rahaman MS. Epidemiological Evidence on the Associations of Metal Exposure with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Among Elderly Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(11):3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113776

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rashid, Fahmida, Khalid M. Khan, Samyukthaa Saiprakash, Giasuddin Ahmed, Rasheda Sultana, Faruque Parvez, Zhahirul Islam, and Md. Shiblur Rahaman. 2025. "Epidemiological Evidence on the Associations of Metal Exposure with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Among Elderly Women" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 11: 3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113776

APA Style

Rashid, F., Khan, K. M., Saiprakash, S., Ahmed, G., Sultana, R., Parvez, F., Islam, Z., & Rahaman, M. S. (2025). Epidemiological Evidence on the Associations of Metal Exposure with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Among Elderly Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), 3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113776

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop