Profile of Sensory Integration Disorders in Migraine Patients—New Perspectives of Therapy
by
, , , ,
Agata Kaniewska
1,*,
Ewelina Bagińska
2,
Marta Masztalewicz
1
,
Krystian Mross
1,
Marta Jankowska
2,
Przemysław Nowacki
1,
Agnieszka Meller
1,
Karolina Machowska-Sempruch
1 and
Wioletta Pawlukowska
1 1
Department of Neurology, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
2
Doctoral School, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3928; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133928
Submission received: 26 May 2024
/
Revised: 26 June 2024
/
Accepted: 2 July 2024
/
Published: 4 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Abstract
Background: The involvement of sensory integration disorders in the pathophysiology of migraine has been suggested. This study aims to analyze the relationship between symptoms of sensory integration disorders and migraine in a broad scope, including all sensory domains, and examine its impact on migraine attacks. Methods: The study included 372 people diagnosed with migraine. The Daniel Travis Questionnaire was used to assess symptoms of sensory integration disorders and their severity across six domains. The relationships between the severity of these symptoms and headache features, as well as accompanying headache symptoms, were the subject of statistical analysis. Results: Current impairment in all sensory domains was significantly associated with headaches exacerbated by everyday life activities. A significant inverse relationship was found between the occurrence of throbbing headaches and symptoms of sensory integration disorders in terms of current sensory discrimination, current motor skills, and current emotional/social skills. Past under-responsiveness and past disturbances in emotional/social abilities were significantly associated with migraine aura. Conclusions: The severity of symptoms of sensory integration disorders affects the clinical picture of migraine. The significant association between migraine and emotional/social disorders, as well as under-responsiveness in the past, needs further research to assess whether this is a cause-and-effect relationship. There is a need for in-depth diagnostics of sensory integration disorders in migraine patients, which could be an additional target of their therapy.
1. Introduction
Migraine is a headache disorder manifested by recurrent 4–72 h headache attacks that have at least two of the following characteristics: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate to severe pain intensity, and aggravation during activities of daily living (ADL) [1]. Additionally, at least one of the following symptoms is present during attacks: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia [1]. Migraine might be preceded by an aura, as well as prodromal symptoms [1,2].
Epidemiological studies show that migraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide and first among young women [3]. The migraine patients experience a significant reduction in quality of life (QoL), affecting both professional and social aspects of daily functioning [4]. Furthermore, it has been proven that the reduction of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this disease depends on the severity and frequency of migraine attacks. The reduction in HRQoL is present, both during migraine attacks and interictal periods [5].
Despite the introduction of new drugs into therapy, there is still a paucity of migraine treatment efficacy [6,7,8]. Research into the pathogenesis of migraine has resulted in a better understanding of the structures and mechanisms responsible for the onset and recurrence of migraine pain [9]. Therefore, it appears that pharmacotherapy is not the only or complete way to improve the lives of migraine patients. Focusing on sensory integration disorders (SID), also known as sensory processing disorder (SPD), may be a useful element of the therapy of the patients. The essence of somatosensory integration disorders is the incorrect integration of visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory, vestibular, and proprioceptive stimuli, which affects the adopted behavioral patterns [10,11]. People may have a reduced or increased threshold for receiving certain types of stimuli, which generates a subsequent pattern of behavior in contact with given stimuli. This results in subjects exhibiting exaggerated responses to sensation in a hyper- or hyporesponsive manner, as well as sensory-seeking behaviors, poor sensory discrimination, and poor sensory-based motor abilities [12]. The diagnosis of SPD should include an analysis of the patient’s functioning in each of these domains [13,14,15]. There is no standardized way to evaluate sensory processing in adults. The assessment is based on an interview with patients, to which questionnaires assessing the severity and frequency of symptoms of disorders can be used. The Daniel Travis Questionnaire, which assesses all domains of somatosensory integration disorders, is such a questionnaire [16].
The involvement of somatosensory integration disorders in the pathophysiology of migraine has been suggested [17,18,19]. Drawing attention to somatosensory integration disorders in migraine stems from the fact that migraine is accompanied by the disorders of multisensory perception—visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile. Hypersensitivity to light, sound, and smell, as well as painful sensation of touch, is a strong part of the clinical picture of migraine—during and between migraine attacks [20,21]. Current research focuses mainly on over-responsivity [22]. It is not known what the disorders in other domains are in this group, as well as whether and how the sensory processing disorders in question affect the clinical picture of migraine. This is a topic worth attention from the point of view of searching for additional therapies in this group of patients.
This study aims to analyze the occurrence and severity of impairment in all domains of Somatosensory Processing Disorder in people with migraine. In the next step, it analyzes all sensory domains in relation to the characteristics of migraine attacks.
It is hypothesized that sensory processing disorder in patients with migraine involves more than one domain. The profile of these disorders may be an important piece in the clinical picture of migraine.
2. Materials and Methods
This is a cross-sectional study.
2.1. Material
The participants were people with migraines, and they completed a self-administered questionnaire shared through the website from 1st March 2023 to 31st July 2023. The study involved 372 (359 women and 13 men; mean age ± SD: 34.7 ± 9.4) out of 400 people who completed the questionnaire and, at the same time, met the criteria for participation in the study. Data collection was closed after this time due to the lack of further activity in completing the questionnaire, and the number of people that could be recruited far exceeded the estimated minimum group size needed for the planned analyses.
The sample size was estimated at 267 persons at a significance level of 0.05, a general population size of 3,200,000 persons, with an acceptable error of 6%. The inclusion criteria were participants’ declaration that migraine diagnosis was established by the neurologist, and the diagnosis was positively verified according to ICHD-3rd (the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition) criteria for migraine without aura and migraine with aura, i.e., experiencing a minimum of five pain attacks lasting 4–72 h if not preceded by the aura or at least two attacks if preceded by the aura. Among headache features, a minimum of two of the following characteristics are needed: unilateral pain, throbbing pain, moderate to severe severity, and avoidance of activities of daily living. In addition, a minimum of one additional symptom is present during an attack: nausea and/or vomiting, phonophobia, and photophobia. The symptoms reported by the patients should not correspond to another diagnosis according to ICHD-3 [1]. The 28 participants mentioned above were people who did not report that migraine diagnosis was established by a neurologist. Some of them declared that migraine diagnosis was established by a neurologist, but they did not meet the diagnostic criteria for migraine according to ICHD-3 based on our verification.
2.2. Methods
A self-administered questionnaire, shared through the website, was used to obtain data about age, sex, and education level. They were asked about headache features, like unilateral, pulsating pain, pain intensity according to Numeric Rating Scale (moderate pain assessed 5–6 points and severe pain 7–10), pain aggravated during normal activity/causing avoidance of daily activity, and headache duration. They were asked about additional symptoms, like sensitivity to light, to noise, and nausea/vomiting.
The above-mentioned information about headache features and accompanying symptoms was used to confirm that the person has migraine-like headaches [1].
The other question was how many episodes of migraine-like headaches the patient had up to the time he/she filled out the questionnaire. More than four were considered to confirm the diagnosis [1]. Any comorbidities were also considered in this regard [1].
Other questions were about the frequency of migraine attacks (average number of attacks per month, considering at least the last three months), the occurrence of non-migraine headaches, the duration of the disorder, taking medications, including medications for migraine (as abortive and preventive treatment).
This study utilizes the Daniel Travis Questionnaire, following the guidelines of the American Society SPD in Adults, to assess symptoms of SPD in individuals aged 18 and older. This collection of symptoms indicating sensory integration disorder is part of the patient’s medical history. An increased frequency or high severity of symptoms may suggest a sensory integration disorder; however, further evaluation is needed.
The Daniel Travis questionnaire was previously used on the Polish population with the supervision of a certified sensory integration therapist. In our study, one of the authors is a certified Ayres Sensory Integration Therapist and Sensorisch-Integrative Ayres Therapie [16,23]. It distinguishes the domains of general modulation (GM, 9 statements), over-responsiveness (OR, 26 statements), under-responsiveness/sensory seeking (UR/SS, 20 statements), sensory discrimination (DS, 26 statements), sensory-based motor abilities (SBMA, 19 statements) and social and emotional (SE, 22 statements). Each symptom was rated by the study participant using a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (regularly occurs). If the problem had occurred in the past but no longer persists, the participant entered the letter P. The sum obtained by adding the values in each domain indicated the severity of the SPD disorder in that domain.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the licensed Statistica 13.3 program (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Means, medians, and, respectively, standard deviations, lower and upper quartiles, as well as numbers and percentages, were used to present the characteristics of the group. The normality of the distribution of the studied variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The analysis of homogeneity of variance was performed using Levene’s test. In almost all analyses, non-normal distribution or heterogeneity of variance was obtained, therefore non-parametric tests were used for further analysis of quantitative data. For statistical analysis, the group of patients with migraine was divided into subgroups based on the presence–absence of particular migraine symptoms: pain caused/exacerbated by activities of daily living, unilateral pain, pulsating pain, the pain of moderate to severe intensity, headache preceded by aura, nausea/vomiting, and photo-/phonophobia. The analysis between these subgroups was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test due to unequal variance. The dependent variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. The significance level of p < 0.05 was assumed (Table 1).
3. Results
Comparing the severity of current and past sensory integration disorders in the analyzed group, we have observed that they are significantly more severe currently than in the past. It concerned each domain (Table 2).
General modulation, over-responsiveness and sensory discrimination, sensory-based motor abilities, as well as social and emotional skills currently were significantly more disturbed among patients with headaches aggravated by ADL compared to patients without this headache feature (Table 3). Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking currently, as well as in the past, was also significantly associated with sensitivity to ADL (Table 3).
We did not find any significant association between particular SPD domains and unilateral character of headache (Table 4).
A significant inverse association was found between the occurrence of throbbing headaches and sensory integration disorders in terms of current sensory discrimination, current motor skills, and current emotional/social skills (Table 5).
We did not find any significant association between particular SPD domains and moderate to severe character of headache (Table 6).
The severity of current general modulation disturbance, over-responsiveness, under-responsiveness/sensory seeking, and social and emotional abilities disturbance were significantly associated with hypersensitivity to light and/or noise during migraine attacks (Table 7).
There were no associations between SPD domains (currently, as well as in the past) and nausea/vomiting occurrence (Table 8).
Under-responsiveness in the past and social-emotional abilities disturbance in the past were significantly more severe in patients experiencing headaches preceded by aura (Table 9).
4. Discussion
Research indicates the influence of abnormal activation of the cerebral cortex in the pathogenesis of migraine, with the involvement of the structures of the somatosensory system in close relationship with the trigeminovascular system [17,18,24]. The occurrence of sensory integration disorders in migraine patients is manifested by cutaneous allodynia, photophobia, phonophobia, and osmophobia. These are clinical symptoms accompanying most migraine attacks [19,20,21]. These ailments may be caused by increased sensitivity, i.e., one of the sensory domains, which, in turn, may influence the overmodulation of other domains.
Our study has shown that people with migraine not only have increased sensitivity but also show significant impairments in all somatosensory domains. Considering these results, it is reasonable to conclude that migraine may be associated with sensory integration disorders.
In the analyzed population of migraine patients, a significant association was found between disorders of each sensory domain and sensitivity to everyday activities. These disorders were significantly more severe in people who experienced headaches worsened by ordinary activities or avoided performing any activities during a migraine attack. During an attack, a patient with this feature of migraine needs silence, peace, as little movement as possible, and as little activation of the senses as possible [25]. This condition appears to reflect chaos in cortical excitation and inhibition, with a consequence of altered multisensory processing [17,26].
Increased sensitivity to everyday activities was also associated with sensory hyposensitivity in the past. Bayes created a theory of learning and showed that disruption of one of the sensory domains in developmental age can lead to “sensory uncertainty”, which translates into a shortening of the time of the presented stimulus [27,28,29,30]. The sensory chaos may evolve over time. The influence of sensory disruption in the past on current sensory domains has been demonstrated, leading to impaired learning and stimulus adaptation [27]. Considering our study, a history of sensory hypersensitivity disorders may lead to dysregulation of all sensory domains in people with migraine.
In almost two-thirds of the analyzed patients, the headache pain was throbbing. It was found that these people had significantly fewer somatosensory integration disorders in terms of sensory discrimination, motor skills, and emotional/social skills compared to patients without throbbing headaches. Research conducted on children has shown that motor functions, emotional abilities, and sensory discrimination constitute a closed entity interacting with each other. Sensory feedback plays an important role in learning new motor skills. Peripheral sensory stimuli increase the excitability of the motor cortex [31]. Studies conducted in patients with Parkinson’s disease have shown that movement disorders are dependent on sensory discrimination disorders [32]. Motor performance is also related to emotional processing [33]. Interestingly, emotional modulations observed both at the early stage of structural development and the later stage of attentional engagement may be the result of interactions between movement and emotion-related information conveyed by emotional body postures. The body expresses emotions through movements, thereby providing simultaneous movement-related information. Therefore, movement and sensory and emotional discrimination functions are self-driving distractors [34].
These associations may indicate the involvement of the dysfunction of these three distractors in the occurrence of throbbing headaches in the migraine patients analyzed in this study. Migraine headaches are worsened by physical activity. During a migraine attack, the perivascular endings of the trigeminal nerve are activated, which leads to the release of pro-inflammatory substances, vasoconstrictors, and vasodilators. As a result, the tissue surrounding the arteries, especially in the meninges, becomes sensitized. Thus, normal pulsations that are not even felt under normal conditions may be felt as pain during a migraine attack. In this setting, any activity that increases heart rate and/or arterial flow causes increased pulsations, which patients experience as throbbing pain (sport and exercise-induced migraines). Studies have shown that physical activity worsens throbbing headaches but reduces the frequency of attacks. Most likely, people with reduced motor skills avoid sports, which reduces the occurrence of throbbing headaches that are provoked by physical exercise [35,36].
During a migraine attack, 80–90% of patients experience photophobia and 70–80% experience phonophobia. Photophobia and phonophobia are part of the diagnostic criteria for migraine. Additionally, migraine patients often experience photophobia, and phonophobia between attacks, and have a lower discomfort threshold in response to visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli in the interictal period compared to non-migraine controls [20,21].
In our group of patients, almost 93% of people with migraine had photo and phonophobia. We showed that these symptoms occurred in people with sensory hyper- or hyposensitivity and emotional disorders. According to the research, emotional disorders result from sensory hyposensitivity. The fMRI studies have shown that migraine sufferers show greater reactivity to visual stimuli in the visual cortex and visual association areas, and it is thought that brain hyperactivity may be associated with symptoms of photophobia. Interictal photosensitivity in migraine patients is associated with structural brain aberrations, including greater cortical thickness in the left frontoparietal and right parieto-occipital regions. Migraine patients also show increased interictal connectivity between the auditory and visual cortices and the anterior insula, which is involved in emotional clarity [37]. Hence, emotional disorders occur in these people. Another form of sensory hypersensitivity is probably related to hypersensitivity of pain processing and modulation areas, including first- and second-order trigeminovascular neurons and thalamic nociceptive neurons [38].
Our study showed that sensory under-responsiveness and over-responsiveness to light and odors are strongly associated. It is worth checking what kind of association this is. Some studies have shown that olfactory functioning is also impaired in sensory hyposensitivity [39].
Migraine with aura occurred in over 30% of the analyzed population. This feature of migraine is closely related to impaired cerebral cortex function (cortical spreading depression) [24]. Past sensory hypersensitivity disorders and emotional disturbances have been observed to be strongly associated with migraine with aura. Sensory integration disorders can be treated. Therefore, it should be investigated whether the inclusion of sensory integration therapy in people with migraine will have an impact on the course of the disease.
According to the literature data, depression that begins in adolescence is associated with a high risk of recurrence in adulthood. Moreover, emotional disorders in childhood increase the occurrence of increased stress and anxiety in adulthood. Sensory hyposensitivity is associated with abnormal emotional behavior, search for sensory impressions, and impulsivity. People with a history of emotional disorders react to sudden stress with panic and anxiety [27,28]. Can providing such contradictory information to the central nervous system lead to “information conflict”, which translates into the appearance of an aura? This hypothesis requires better testing, but considering the mechanisms occurring in migraine, it is highly probable.
The collected database shows a certain sensory integration profile characteristic of people suffering from migraines: people who need self-stimulation, we can call them sensory seekers, and those who are over-responsive, sensory avoiders. The goal of sensory integration therapy for this group of patients would be to improve sensory processing of the nervous system and consequently influence migraine symptoms.
Study Limitations
Our study is a prelude to further research into the association of migraine with SPD occurrence. It is certain that the disorder encompasses all domains and not only the occurrence of hypersensitivity, as thought until now. While we have extracted a specific sensory integration profile specific to people with migraine (based on the assessment of the presence of main SPD symptoms), it is worthwhile to deepen this topic based on the full SPD diagnosis. A weakness of this study is also the fact that it was survey-based.
Separate research on the significance of SPD in the pathophysiology of migraine is needed.
5. Conclusions
- Somatosensory integration disorders in migraine concern hypersensitivity to stimuli, as well as affect other domains.
- The scope of SPD affects the clinical picture of migraine, especially the occurrence of sensitivity to everyday activities, the pulsating nature of the headache, photophobia, and hypersensitivity to noise.
- The significant relationship between migraine and emotional disorders, as well as under-responsiveness in the past, needs further research to assess whether this is a cause-and-effect relationship.
- Based on the frequency of SPD symptoms in migraine patients, there are strong reasons for in-depth diagnostics of sensory integration disorders in these patients, which could be an additional target of therapy.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.M.-S., A.M. and M.M.; Methodology, W.P.; Validation, W.P. and M.M.; Formal Analysis, A.K., E.B., K.M., M.J., P.N., M.M. and W.P.; Investigation, A.K., K.M. and M.J.; Resources, A.K., K.M. and M.J.; Data Curation, A.K. and E.B.; writing—original draft Preparation, A.K., E.B., K.M. and M.J.; writing—review & editing, W.P.; Supervision, W.P.; Project Administration, W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland (approval code: KB.006.41.2023, date of approval 28 April 2023) and performed by the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent Statement
All patients provided written informed consent.
Data Availability Statement
The data cannot be made publicly available due to privacy regulations.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- International Headache Society. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2018, 38, 1–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giffin, N.; Ruggiero, L.; Lipton, R. Premonitory Symptoms in Migraine: An Electronic Diary Study. Neurology 2003, 60, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vos, T.; Lim, S.S.; Abbafati, C.; Ansari, F.; Ansari, I.; Ansari-Moghaddam, A.; Antonio, C.A.T.; Antony, C.M.; Antriyandarti, E.; Anvari, D.; et al. Global Burden of 369 Diseases and Injuries in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buse, D.C.; Fanning, K.M.; Reed, M.L.; Murray, S.; Dumas, P.K.; Adams, A.M.; Lipton, R.B. Life with Migraine: Effects on Relationships, Career, and Finances from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2019, 59, 1286–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnston, K.M.; L’Italien, G.; Popoff, E.; Powell, L.; Croop, R.; Thiry, A.; Harris, L.; Coric, V.; Lipton, R.B. Mapping Migraine-Specific Quality of Life to Health State Utilities in Patients Receiving Rimegepant. Adv. Ther. 2021, 38, 5209–5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moreno-Ajona, D.; Pérez-Rodríguez, A.; Goadsby, P.J. Gepants, Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists: What Could Be Their Role in Migraine Treatment? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2020, 33, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mitsikostas, D.D.; Waeber, C.; Sánchez, M.; Raffaelli, B.; Håkan, A.; Maassen Van Den Brink, A.; Andreou, A.P.; Pozo-Rosich, P.; Rapoport, A.M.; Ashina, M.; et al. The 5-HT1F Receptor as the Target of Ditans in Migraine—From Bench to Bedside. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2023, 19, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ford, J.H.; Jackson, J.; Milligan, G.; Cotton, S.; Ahl, J.; Aurora, S.K. A Real-World Analysis of Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2017, 57, 1532–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffmann, J.; Baca, S.M.; Akerman, S. Neurovascular Mechanisms of Migraine and Cluster Headache. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 573–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koziol, L.F.; Budding, D.E.; Chidekel, D. Sensory Integration, Sensory Processing, and Sensory Modulation Disorders: Putative Functional Neuroanatomic Underpinnings. Cerebellum 2011, 10, 770–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lane, S.J.; Mailloux, Z.; Schoen, S.; Bundy, A.; May-Benson, T.A.; Parham, L.D.; Smith Roley, S.; Schaaf, R.C. Neural Foundations of Ayres Sensory Integration®. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunn, W. The Impact of Sensory Processing Abilities on the Daily Lives of Young Children and Their Families: A Conceptual Model. Infants Young Child. 1997, 9, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Antonio, F.; Ilenia, M.; Ferrazzano, G.; Trebbastoni, A.; Amicarelli, S.; Campanelli, A.; de Lena, C.; Berardelli, A.; Conte, A. Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination Threshold in Patients with Cognitive Disorders. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 70, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Bruyn, N.; Saenen, L.; Thijs, L.; Van Gils, A.; Ceulemans, E.; Essers, B.; Lafosse, C.; Michielsen, M.; Beyens, H.; Schillebeeckx, F.; et al. Sensorimotor vs. Motor Upper Limb Therapy for Patients with Motor and Somatosensory Deficits: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Early Rehabilitation Phase after Stroke. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 597666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kragel, P.A.; LaBar, K.S. Somatosensory Representations Link the Perception of Emotional Expressions and Sensory Experience. eNeuro 2016, 3, ENEURO.0090-15.2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Wołoszyn-Jess, M.; Borecki, K.; Rudnicki, B. Zaburzenia Przetwarzania Sensorycznego a Jakość Życia Osób Powyżej 50. Roku Życia. Integr. Sensoryczna 2016, 4, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- Goadsby, P.J.; Holland, P.R.; Martins-Oliveira, M.; Hoffmann, J.; Schankin, C.; Akerman, S. Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 553–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coppola, G.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Schoenen, J.; Pierelli, F. Habituation and Sensitization in Primary Headaches. J. Headache Pain 2013, 14, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Tommaso, M.; Ambrosini, A.; Brighina, F.; Coppola, G.; Perrotta, A.; Pierelli, F.; Sandrini, G.; Valeriani, M.; Marinazzo, D.; Stramaglia, S.; et al. Altered Processing of Sensory Stimuli in Patients with Migraine. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014, 10, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Main, A.; Dowson, A.; Gross, M. Photophobia and Phonophobia in Migraineurs between Attacks. Headache 1997, 37, 492–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelman, L.; Tanis, D. The Relationship between Migraine Pain and Other Associated Symptoms. Cephalalgia 2006, 26, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwedt, T.J. Multisensory Integration in Migraine. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Bloch, M.; Sobolewski, P.; Adler, G. Przeżycia Związane Z Pracą Ratownika Medycznego Jako Efekt Zaburzeń Integracji Sensorycznej. Integr. Sensoryczna 2015, 3, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
- Harriott, A.M.; Takizawa, T.; Chung, D.Y.; Chen, S.-P. Spreading Depression as a Preclinical Model of Migraine. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lipton, R.B.; Halker, B.; Mechtler, L.; McVige, J.; Ma, J.; Sung, Y.Y.; Stokes, J.; Dabruzzo, B.; Gandhi, P.; Ashina, M. Patient-Reported Migraine-Specific Quality of Life, Activity Impairment and Headache Impact with Once-Daily Atogepant for Preventive Treatment of Migraine in a Randomized, 52-Week Trial. Cephalalgia 2023, 43, 3331024231190296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benarous, X.; Bury, V.; Lahaye, H.; Desrosiers, L.; Cohen, D.; Guilé, J.M. Sensory Processing Difficulties in Youths with Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beierholm, U.; Rohe, T.; Ferrari, A.; Stegle, O.; Noppeney, U. Using the Past to Estimate Sensory Uncertainty. eLife 2020, 9, e54172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brand-Gothelf, A.; Parush, S.; Eitan, Y.; Admoni, S.; Gur, E.; Stein, D. Sensory Modulation Disorder Symptoms in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2015, 49, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rutter, M.; Kim-Cohen, J.; Maughan, B. Continuities and Discontinuities in Psychopathology between Childhood and Adult Life. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2006, 47, 276–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Agostino, N.M.; Edelstein, K.; Zhang, N.; Recklitis, C.J.; Brinkman, T.M.; Srivastava, D.; Leisenring, W.M.; Robison, L.L.; Armstrong, G.T.; Krull, K.R. Comorbid Symptoms of Emotional Distress in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Cancer 2016, 122, 3215–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wuang, Y.-P.; Huang, C.-L.; Tsai, H.-Y. Sensory Integration and Perceptual-Motor Profiles in School-Aged Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2020, 16, 1661–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, M.S.; Lyoo, C.H.; Lee, M.J.; Sim, J.; Cho, H.; Choi, Y.H. Impaired Finger Dexterity in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Correlates with Discriminative Cutaneous Sensory Dysfunction. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 2531–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marzolla, M.C.; Wijenberg, M.; Stapert, S.; Hurks, P.; Schepers, J.; van Heugten, C. Hypersensitivity to Noise and Light over 1 Year after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Study on Self-Reported Hypersensitivity and Its Influence on Long-Term Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023, 38, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borhani, K.; Làdavas, E.; Maier, M.E.; Avenanti, A.; Bertini, C. Emotional and Movement-Related Body Postures Modulate Visual Processing. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2015, 10, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amin, F.M.; Aristeidou, S.; Baraldi, C.; Czapinska-Ciepiela, E.K.; Ariadni, D.D.; Di Lenola, D.; Fenech, C.; Kampouris, K.; Karagiorgis, G.; Braschinsky, M.; et al. The Association between Migraine and Physical Exercise. J. Headache Pain 2018, 19, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Irby, M.B.; Bond, D.S.; Lipton, R.B.; Nicklas, B.; Houle, T.T.; Penzien, D.B. Aerobic Exercise for Reducing Migraine Burden: Mechanisms, Markers, and Models of Change Processes. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2015, 56, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pearl, T.A.; Dumkrieger, G.; Chong, C.D.; Dodick, D.W.; Schwedt, T.J. Sensory Hypersensitivity Symptoms in Migraine with vs without Aura: Results from the American Registry for Migraine Research. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2020, 60, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iyengar, S.; Johnson, K.W.; Ossipov, M.H.; Aurora, S.K. CGRP and the Trigeminal System in Migraine. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2019, 59, 659–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stein, D.; Gross-Isseroff, R.; Besserglick, R.; Ziv, A.; Mayer, G.; Yaroslavsky, A.; Toledano, A.; Voet, H.; Weizman, A.; Hermesh, H. Olfactory Function and Alternation Learning in Eating Disorders. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 22, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
The characteristics of analyzed migraine patients (n = 372).
| Demographic Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.7 ± 9.4 | Age (Years; Mean ± SD) | |
| 359 (96.50%) | Females | Sex, n (%) |
| 13 (3.49%) | Males | |
| 0 (0.00%) | Primary | Education, n (%) |
| 9 (2.42%) | Vocational | |
| 92 (24.73%) | High school | |
| 271 (72.85%) | University | |
| Migraine features | ||
| 242 (65.05%) | Yes | Pain caused/exacerbated by activities of daily living, n (%) |
| 130 (34.95%) | No | |
| 306 (82.26%) | Yes | Unilateral pain, n (%) |
| 66 (17.74%) | No | |
| 236 (63.44%) | Yes | Pulsating pain, n (%) |
| 136 (36.56%) | No | |
| 233 (62.73%) | Yes | Pain of moderate intensity, n (%) |
| 139 (37.26%) | No | |
| 234 (62.90%) | Yes | Headache preceded by aura, n (%) |
| 138 (37.09%) | No | |
| 281 (75.54%) | Yes | Nausea/vomiting, n (%) |
| 91 (24.46%) | No | |
| 347 (93.28%) | Yes | Photo-/phonophobia, n (%) |
| 25 (6.72%) | No | |
Table 2.
Current and past distribution of Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire.
Table 2.
Current and past distribution of Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire.
| p | Disturbance Intensity | Sensory Processing Disorder Domain |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000 | 13.502 ± 7.534 | General modulation |
| 0.061 ± 0.241 | General modulation in the past | |
| 0.000 | 40.693 ± 20.813 | Over-responsiveness |
| 0.247 ± 0.702 | Over-responsiveness in the past | |
| 0.000 | 27.115 ± 15.395 | Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking |
| 0.451 ± 1.425 | Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | |
| 0.000 | 25.879 ± 18.326 | Sensory discrimination |
| 0.494 ± 1.283 | Sensory discrimination in the past | |
| 0.000 | 18.989 ± 15.048 | Sensory-based motor abilities |
| 0.263 ± 1.195 | Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | |
| 0.000 | 36.387 ± 18.391 | Social and emotional |
| 0.432 ± 1.539 | Social and emotional in the past |
Table 3.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: pain caused/exacerbated by activities of daily living—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 3.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: pain caused/exacerbated by activities of daily living—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Pain Caused/Exacerbated by Activities of Daily Living | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 242) | (n = 130) | ||
| General modulation | 14.566 | 11.523 | 0.000 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.239 | 0.261 | 0.711 |
| Over-responsiveness | 42.462 | 37.400 | 0.015 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.512 | 0.338 | 0.251 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 28.747 | 24.076 | 0.002 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.566 | 0.361 | 0.023 |
| Sensory discrimination | 27.132 | 23.546 | 0.034 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.268 | 0.253 | 0.406 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 16.769 | 15.421 | 0.027 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.210 | 0.215 | 0.630 |
| Social and emotional | 39.016 | 31.492 | 0.000 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.396 | 0.500 | 0.867 |
Table 4.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: unilateral pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 4.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: unilateral pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Unilateral Pain | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 306) | (n = 66) | ||
| General modulation | 13.075 | 13.594 | 0.589 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.212 | 1.022 | 0.274 |
| Over-responsiveness | 41.026 | 21.355 | 0.589 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.651 | 0.408 | 0.672 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 26.166 | 27.320 | 0.403 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.545 | 0.483 | 0.999 |
| Sensory discrimination | 26.090 | 25.833 | 0.787 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.469 | 0.218 | 0.484 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 17.393 | 19.333 | 0.248 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.363 | 0.179 | 0.559 |
| Social and emotional | 35.924 | 36.486 | 0.930 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.651 | 0.385 | 0.929 |
Table 5.
SPD domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: pulsating pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 5.
SPD domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: pulsating pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Pulsating Pain | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 236) | (n = 136) | ||
| General modulation | 12.897 | 13.851 | 0.280 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.235 | 0.254 | 0.949 |
| Over-responsiveness | 39.220 | 41.542 | 0.293 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.455 | 0.449 | 0.415 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 25.485 | 28.055 | 0.113 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.544 | 0.466 | 0.510 |
| Sensory discrimination | 23.183 | 27.432 | 0.038 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.360 | 0.207 | 0.876 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 16.536 | 20.402 | 0.010 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.205 | 0.216 | 0.655 |
| Social and emotional | 33.786 | 37.885 | 0.037 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.286 | 0.516 | 0.244 |
Table 6.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: moderate to severe pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 6.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to headache features: moderate to severe pain—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Moderate to Severe Pain | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 233) | (n = 139) | ||
| General modulation | 13.678 | 13.208 | 0.617 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.227 | 0.280 | 0.664 |
| Over-responsiveness | 40.716 | 20.728 | 0.813 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.351 | 0.618 | 0.299 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 26.583 | 28.007 | 0.358 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.480 | 0.517 | 0.239 |
| Sensory discrimination | 24.836 | 27.625 | 0.219 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.150 | 0.453 | 0.103 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 19.064 | 18.863 | 0.850 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.154 | 0.309 | 0.351 |
| Social and emotional | 36.858 | 35.597 | 0.435 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.381 | 0.517 | 0.596 |
Table 7.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: hypersensitivity to noise, light—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 7.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: hypersensitivity to noise, light—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Hypersensitivity to Noise, Light | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 347) | (n = 25) | ||
| General modulation | 13.876 | 8.320 | 0.000 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.253 | 0.160 | 0.934 |
| Over-responsiveness | 41.590 | 28.240 | 0.001 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.435 | 0.680 | 0.355 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 27.766 | 18.080 | 0.000 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.498 | 0.440 | 0.475 |
| Sensory discrimination | 26.449 | 17.960 | 0.008 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.259 | 0.320 | 0.927 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 19.265 | 15.160 | 0.309 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.201 | 0.360 | 0.318 |
| Social and emotional | 37.074 | 26.840 | 0.008 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.452 | 0.160 | 0.536 |
Table 8.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: nausea or vomiting—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 8.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: nausea or vomiting—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Nausea, Vomiting | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 281) | (n = 91) | ||
| General modulation | 13.351 | 13.551 | 0.934 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.274 | 0.238 | 0.908 |
| Over-responsiveness | 39.857 | 40.964 | 0.881 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.494 | 0.437 | 0.448 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 28.219 | 26.758 | 0.393 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.395 | 0.526 | 0.191 |
| Sensory discrimination | 27.021 | 25.508 | 0.259 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.186 | 0.288 | 0.432 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 17.461 | 19.483 | 0.518 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.230 | 0.206 | 0.583 |
| Social and emotional | 38.109 | 35.829 | 0.230 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.461 | 0.423 | 0.231 |
Table 9.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: headache preceded by an aura—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
Table 9.
Sensory Processing Disorder domains in migraine patients using Daniel Travis Questionnaire in relation to migraine accompanying symptoms: headache preceded by an aura—assessed with ICHD-3 criteria.
| Sensory Processing Disorder Domain | Headache Preceded by an Aura | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| (n = 234) | (n = 138) | ||
| General modulation | 13.442 | 13.538 | 0.837 |
| General modulation in the past | 0.239 | 0.252 | 0.801 |
| Over-responsiveness | 40.847 | 40.602 | 0.901 |
| Over-responsiveness in the past | 0.384 | 0.491 | 0.660 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking | 25.833 | 27.871 | 0.354 |
| Under-responsiveness/sensory seeking in the past | 0.420 | 0.538 | 0.047 |
| Sensory discrimination | 25.137 | 26.316 | 0.508 |
| Sensory discrimination in the past | 0.275 | 0.256 | 0.953 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities | 18.833 | 19.081 | 0.793 |
| Sensory-based motor abilities in the past | 0.188 | 0.226 | 0.405 |
| Social and emotional | 36.847 | 36.115 | 0.793 |
| Social and emotional in the past | 0.231 | 0.551 | 0.016 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kaniewska, A.; Bagińska, E.; Masztalewicz, M.; Mross, K.; Jankowska, M.; Nowacki, P.; Meller, A.; Machowska-Sempruch, K.; Pawlukowska, W. Profile of Sensory Integration Disorders in Migraine Patients—New Perspectives of Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133928
AMA Style
Kaniewska A, Bagińska E, Masztalewicz M, Mross K, Jankowska M, Nowacki P, Meller A, Machowska-Sempruch K, Pawlukowska W. Profile of Sensory Integration Disorders in Migraine Patients—New Perspectives of Therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(13):3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133928
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaniewska, Agata, Ewelina Bagińska, Marta Masztalewicz, Krystian Mross, Marta Jankowska, Przemysław Nowacki, Agnieszka Meller, Karolina Machowska-Sempruch, and Wioletta Pawlukowska. 2024. "Profile of Sensory Integration Disorders in Migraine Patients—New Perspectives of Therapy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 13: 3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133928
APA StyleKaniewska, A., Bagińska, E., Masztalewicz, M., Mross, K., Jankowska, M., Nowacki, P., Meller, A., Machowska-Sempruch, K., & Pawlukowska, W. (2024). Profile of Sensory Integration Disorders in Migraine Patients—New Perspectives of Therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(13), 3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133928
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
