Next Article in Journal
Venom Immunotherapy Does Not Affect Survival of Patients with Malignant Tumor in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Can Laparoscopic Surgery Reduce Fatigue in Women with Endometriosis?—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis

1
Heart and Vascular Institute, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
2
Department of Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
3
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
4
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3151; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113151
Submission received: 21 April 2024 / Revised: 22 May 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Mental health and substance use disorders (MHDs and SUDs) affect cardiac allograft and VAD recipients and impact their quality of life and compliance. Limited research currently exists on MHDs and SUDs in this population. Methods: This study compares the incidence of MHDs and SUDs in the transplant list, VAD, and post-transplant patients with that in heart failure patients. Study cohorts were derived from the TriNetX database using ICD-10 codes. Differences in incidence were examined using the log-rank test. Adults with MHDs and SUDs before the window of time were excluded. All comparisons were made between propensity-matched cohorts. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Transplant waitlist patients showed a significant increase in the incidence of anxiety, depression, panic, adjustment, mood, alcohol use, and eating disorders. Post-transplant patients showed a significant increase in depression and opioid use. VAD patients showed a significant increase in depression and a decrease in panic disorder and anxiety. These results allow for further investigations on prevention and coping strategies. Conclusions: The deterioration of mental health can significantly impact medication compliance, survival, and quality of life. Opioid use for pain management in the early postoperative period should be further investigated to assess its impact on long-term substance use and addiction.

1. Introduction

The global prevalence of mental health disorders has been on the rise and affects the quality of life in heart failure patients [1,2]. Depression and anxiety have been noted to affect more than 30% of the transplant population, which can influence outcomes in this population [3]. Patients with advanced heart failure may wait years on the cardiac transplant list before undergoing heart transplantation. Others may be candidates for ventricular assist devices (VADs) as a bridge to transplant or as a destination therapy for life. The uncertainty, fear, and medical challenges of these experiences may have a significant impact on patients’ mental health. Depression affects solid-organ recipients, and most studies suggest depression is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality after transplant [1,2,3,4,5]. Pre-transplant depression can influence outcomes such as medication compliance and hospitalizations but did not show a significant impact on post-transplant survival [2,4]. Poor mental health has been shown to decrease treatment compliance and increase hospitalizations/infectious complications in post-transplant patients [4]. The use of immunosuppressive drugs, especially corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, as well as continued medical issues and health anxiety, likely contribute to deterioration in mental and physical health [2]. It has been shown that physical activity improves frailty [6]. Motivation to be physically active and exercise is influenced by emotional well-being and therefore significantly impacts the quality of life [6,7].
After cardiac transplantation or VAD implantation, concerns such as diet, adjustment, lifestyle, medication regimen, and follow-up care are closely monitored, especially in the months following surgery. However, psychiatric disorders may present during the preoperative and anytime in the postoperative course, thus requiring lifelong attention. This emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary care coordination and support for heart failure patients while waiting, before, and after surgical intervention. Rehabilitation should address physical well-being and cognitive and psychological functioning, which are needed to extend beyond the postoperative period.
Elevated rates of depression, anxiety, and decreased QOL have been identified in post-transplant patients and inconsistently in VAD patients [8,9,10,11]. However, there is limited evidence as to the effect of other mental health disorders (MHDs) and SUDs. This study compares the incidence of a range of MHDs and SUDs in the transplant waitlist, VAD, and post-transplant patients with that of heart failure patients to help pave the way for further investigations in this area, which will impact the quality of life and outcomes in these populations.

2. Materials and Methods

TriNetX is a global health research network that compiles decoded data from the electronic health records of many healthcare organizations. Hence, research does not require an institutional review board review [12]. TriNetX includes large academic medical institutions across the world. The data are stored on servers or through a virtual platform at participating institutions that are subsequently collected and aggregated. Demographic, diagnostic, and clinical data were used. Decoded data were used from the Global Collaborative Network consisting of 104 healthcare organizations in 30 countries. The database includes insured and uninsured patients. This study is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant and is exempt from IRB approval. The process by which datasets are deidentified by TriNetX is attested through a formal determination by a qualified expert, as defined in Section §164.514(b) (1) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Protected Health Information (PHI) is therefore made available to the users of the platform in a deidentified format.
The analysis process included two main steps: (1) defining the cohorts through query criteria and (2) setting up and running the analysis. Setting up the analysis required definitions for the index event, outcomes criteria, and the time frame. Outcomes were compared using four analyses: measures of association, survival, number of instances, and lab result distribution. These analyses have additional options, including the outcomes’ definitions and analysis specifications. Propensity score matching was used in this study. The first three analyses support the setting designated as “exclude patients with outcomes before the window”. The measure of association analysis calculates and compares the fraction of patients with the selected outcome.
Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier test to estimate the probability of the outcome at a respective time interval (the daily time interval was used in this analysis). To account for the patients who exited the cohort during the analysis period, censoring was applied. In this analysis, patients were removed from the analysis (censored) after the last fact in their record.
In the analysis involving the number of instances, we calculated how many times the outcome occurred in the time window. This analysis included two additional settings: “include patients with zero instances” and “the definition of an instance”. Selecting to exclude patients with zero instances would remove these patients from the calculations for mean number of instances, standard deviation, or median.
Table 1 shows the ICD codes used in this study for diagnosis. The incidence of MHDs and SUDs was compared in adult patients with heart failure with those who were on the transplant waitlist, had VADs, and those who received cardiac transplant within 15 years of the index event. Index events that occurred up to 20 years ago were included. An index event was defined as the time the patient entered the cohort. This was set to the first diagnosis of heart failure for control patients and the date of transplant/VAD insertion or first registration for those on the cardiac transplant waitlist. Differences in incidence were examined using the log-rank test and hazard ratios. Patients with mental health disorders before the time window were excluded. Patients between ages 0 and 100 were included. Propensity score matching was performed using TriNetX (https://ctsi.psu.edu/research-support/trinetx, Transplant and transplant waitlist on 28 September 2023, and Vad list on 29 September 2023) to balance demographic and medical comorbidities. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Transplant Waitlist Patients

After propensity score matching, 29,900 patients were identified in each cohort. The mean ages at the index event were 49.3 +/− 21.5 for heart failure patients and 64.6 +/− 18.7 for transplant waitlist patients. The characteristics of this cohort are shown in Table 2.
Transplant waitlist patients showed a statistically significant increase in the incidence of anxiety, panic disorder, adjustment disorder, depression, alcohol use disorder, and eating disorder. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant impact of anxiety, panic disorder, adjustment disorder, depression, mood disorder, nicotine dependence, opioid use, dementia, and eating disorders on the waitlist patients. The other tested parameters were not significant, as shown in Table 3.

3.2. Cardiac Transplant Patients

After propensity score matching, 4855 patients were identified in each cohort. The only variable that differed significantly between the two groups was age, which was higher in heart failure patients, as shown in Table 4. The mean age at index was 68.9 +/− 16.7 for heart failure patients and 44.8 +/− 20.9 for transplant patients.
Post-transplant patients showed a statistically significant 1.5–2-fold increase in the incidence of adjustment disorder, depression, and opioid use compared to the heart failure population, as noted in Table 5. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant impact of a heart transplant on adjustment, mood, and opioid use disorders. The other tested parameters were not significant.

3.3. VAD Patients

In total, 10,659 patients were identified in each cohort after propensity score matching. The VAD cohort was older than the heart failure cohort (61.3 +/− 16.4 vs. 34.1 +/− 20.3 years, respectively). The other baseline characteristics shown in Table 6 were comparable between groups.
VAD patients showed a statistically significant increase in the incidence of depression and a statistically significant decrease in panic disorder and anxiety. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of somatoform, adjustment, mood, alcohol, eating, opioid disorders, PTSD, nicotine use, or self-harm. Survival analysis (13.6 years) showed a statistically significant impact of anxiety, panic disorder, PTSD, adjustment, depression, eating disorder, self-harm, opioid/alcohol use, and nicotine dependence, as noted in Table 7. Interestingly, opioid use in this population seemed to confer a survival benefit with a hazard ratio of 0.74. A marginal but significant survival benefit was also noted with nicotine dependence. Both of these factors showed a nonsignificant decrease in incidence in the VAD population.

4. Discussion

The majority of studies about mental health and transplant/VAD patients to date focus on depressive and anxiety symptoms in cardiac transplant patients. We attempted to perform a comprehensive analysis of MHDs and SUDs in three subgroups of heart failure patients using the largest patient cohort size to date.

4.1. Transplant List Patients

The waitlist period can last days to years. Absolute contraindications are a history of medical noncompliance and poor social support [13]. Some studies suggest that psychiatric conditions may negatively affect transplant outcomes through poor adherence, self-injurious behaviors, drug interactions, and poor social support on the whole [13].
Our results revealed that cardiac transplant waitlist patients had a statistically significant increase in the incidence of six psychiatric disorders (anxiety, depression, panic, adjustment, alcohol use, and eating disorders), whereas in the post-transplant patients, significant increases in incidence were noted only in adjustment disorder and depression. In the VAD population, a significant increase in incidence was only noted in depression, while anxiety and panic disorder were significantly decreased.
The trends noted in this study may be because the waitlist period is critical in maintaining eligibility for transplants and a time of uncertainty, fear, and stress. Early diagnosis, treatment, and improved access to resources for patients on the transplant waitlist are critical in improving survival and candidacy for transplant patients. This also highlights inequity between those who may have better social support and increased access to care and resources, which need further investigation.
The literature regarding posttransplant outcomes of patients with psychiatric disorders is inconsistent [14]. Studies cite a history of suicide/self-harm, depressive episodes, and poor medical adherence as the greatest factors impacting post-transplant survival time [14,15,16]. However, a comprehensive review contradicted these findings, suggesting that there is no clear association between prior psychiatric illness and morbidity and mortality and that patients with psychiatric conditions can have good outcomes after transplant [14,15,16,17]. Candidacy for transplant should be made through consideration of individual risk factors, not the presence of psychiatric conditions, to avoid stigmatization of this patient population.

4.2. Cardiac Transplant Patients

Our results revealed that transplant patients had a significant increase in the incidence of depression and opioid use disorder compared to heart failure patients. This supports existing research suggesting that transplant increases the risk of depression, often due to difficulty in coping with a lifestyle change and complications [4,18,19]. Interestingly, it is believed that the rates of anxiety and depression are lower in patients receiving heart transplants compared to those undergoing other cardiac surgeries, including valve replacement [20].
Studies have found that cardiac transplant patients are at increased risk (3–10%) of developing opioid use disorder. Severe pain during the recovery period may increase the risk of long-term dependence on opioids [19]. Decreasing the dose and duration of opioids prescribed at discharge may decrease the risk of long-term opioid use and dependence.

4.3. VAD Patients

Our results revealed that VAD patients had a statistically increased incidence of depression and a statistically significant decrease in panic disorder and anxiety following VAD implantation. Some evidence shows an initial improvement in depression and anxiety after implantation; however, patient-reported outcomes remained lower than those of transplant patients [9,21,22]. Our study looked at the longitudinal development of these disorders on a scale of over ten years, whereas these studies looked at weeks–month-long periods. Further investigation into the timing and onset of anxiety and depression is warranted.
VADs increase the risk of PTSD or panic disorder, despite the possibility of acute VAD dysfunction or mechanical failure [9]. Similarly, our results found a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of PTSD and anxiety following VAD insertion compared to heart failure patients. Existing research is primarily focused on anxiety, depression, and PTSD only.
Studies have found that depression and anxiety increase prior to VAD implantation, decline again after surgery, and resurface with complications and difficulty with adjustment [9,10]. While services are aimed at all phases, counseling and psychiatric services are generally concentrated around surgical intervention [8,23,24]. Years after the transplant, the patient may still struggle to cope and have recurrent medical complications. Patients with depression have been found to have elevated rates of stroke and sepsis [3]. Resources are most concentrated around the pre-and postoperative period. MHDs and SUDs are known to impact treatment compliance as well as compliance with lifestyle interventions, which is an important factor in predicting survival. Screening, counseling, and pharmacologic treatment should be offered when necessary.
This study was limited by its retrospective nature. Transplant candidates and VAD/transplant recipients may have more frequent interactions with the healthcare system and may be more likely to be diagnosed with an MHD or SUD than patients with heart failure. Some misidentification is possible with the use of a large, national database. Because the database was intended for billing purposes, it lacks granularity and may be missing data, which could contribute to underreporting of MHDs/SUDs. We were also unable to account for comorbid SUDs and MHDs. Further studies should assess the time to onset of mental health disorders and trends in correlation with treatment advances. There is also a need to determine the optimal management of patients with pre-existing MHDs in addition to those who develop disorders.

5. Conclusions

This is the first report on an extensive analysis of different MHDs and SUDs in the adult heart failure population undergoing advanced cardiac surgical therapies that impact a change in the quality of life postoperatively. We used propensity score matching to decrease intrinsic differences in confounding variables among the groups to ensure that data were more robust. These results lay the groundwork for further studies to investigate current prevention and strategies in place for transplant candidates as well as transplant and VAD patients. Increased rates of MHDs and SUDs are likely multifactorial. Early diagnosis, treatment, and improved access to resources for VAD, transplant candidates, and recipients may improve outcomes. The incorporation of longitudinal psychiatric care may improve patient quality of life and survival.
The limitations of this work are that it is a retrospective analysis that uses ICD codes with no interactions with any patient, which excludes any personal clinical insight.
Future investigations should include randomized prospective studies. Additionally, AI-driven algorithms should be used to study risk factors for MHDs and SUDs in this population on data collected prospectively. The identification of risk factors can help develop risk prediction models to improve patient selection and achieve better patient outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.N., D.D. and B.M.; methodology, C.G. and D.D.; software, C.G.; validation, N.N. and D.D.; formal analysis, C.G.; investigation, N.N., D.D. and C.G.; resources, N.N.; data curation, N.N.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.; writing—review and editing, N.N.; visualization, N.N.; supervision, N.N.; project administration, N.N. and D.D.; funding acquisition, none for this project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest concerning this work/project.

References

  1. Truong, H.P.; Nguyen, K.M.; Tran, H.T.; Hoang, S.V. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study in Vietnam. Cureus 2023, 15, e51098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Corbett, C.; Armstrong, M.J.; Parker, R.; Webb, K.; Neuberger, J.M. Mental health disorders and solid-organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 2013, 96, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alyaydin, E.; Sindermann, J.R.; Köppe, J.; Gerss, J.; Dröge, P.; Ruhnke, T.; Günster, C.; Reinecke, H.; Feld, J. Depression and Anxiety in Heart Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Impact on Post-Transplant Outcomes. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dew, M.A.; Rosenberger, E.M.; Myaskovsky, L.; DiMartini, A.F.; DeVito Dabbs, A.J.; Posluszny, D.M.; Steel, J.; Switzer, G.E.; Shellmer, D.A.; Greenhouse, J.B. Depression and Anxiety as Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality After Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transplantation 2015, 100, 988–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Delibasic, M.; Mohamedali, B.; Dobrilovic, N.; Raman, J. Pre-transplant depression as a predictor of adherence and morbidities after orthotopic heart transplantation. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2017, 12, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pfeifer, P.M.; Ruschel, P.P.; Bordignon, S. Estratégias de enfrentamento pós-transplante cardíaco: Implicações psicológicas. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013, 28, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marques-Sule, E.; Hansen, D.; Almenar, L.; Deka, P.; Sentandreu-Mañó, T.; López-Vilella, R.; Klompstra, L.; Machado, F.V.C. What motivates heart transplantation patients to exercise and engage in physical activity? A network analysis. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2024, 23, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tigges-Limmer, K.; Brocks, Y.; Winkler, Y.; Stock Gissendanner, S.; Morshuis, M.; Gummert, J.F. Mental health interventions during ventricular assist device therapy: A scoping review. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2018, 27, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weerahandi, H.; Goldstein, N.; Gelfman, L.P.; Jorde, U.; Kirkpatrick, J.N.; Meyerson, E.; Marble, J.; Naka, Y.; Pinney, S.; Slaughter, M.S.; et al. The Relationship Between Psychological Symptoms and Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2017, 54, 870–876.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bidwell, J.T.; Lyons, K.S.; Mudd, J.O.; Gelow, J.M.; Chien, C.V.; Hiatt, S.O.; Grady, K.L.; Lee, C.S. Quality of Life, Depression, and Anxiety in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Longitudinal Outcomes for Patients and Family Caregivers. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2017, 32, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mehra, M.R.; Canter, C.E.; Hannan, M.M.; Semigran, M.J.; Uber, P.A.; Baran, D.A.; Danziger-Isakov, L.; Kirklin, J.K.; Kirk, R.; Kushwaha, S.S.; et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: A 10-year update. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2016, 35, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. TriNetX 2024. Available online: https://ctsi.psu.edu/research-support/trinetx/ (accessed on 19 May 2024).
  13. Kop, W.J. Role of psychological factors in the clinical course of heart transplant patients. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2010, 29, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rosenberger, E.M.; Dew, M.A.; Crone, C.; DiMartini, A.F. Psychiatric disorders as risk factors for adverse medical outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ. Transplant. 2012, 17, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Owen, J.E.; Bonds, C.L.; Wellisch, D.K. Psychiatric evaluations of heart transplant candidates: Predicting post-transplant hospitalizations, rejection episodes, and survival. Psychosomatics 2006, 47, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Faeder, S.; Moschenross, D.; Rosenberger, E.; Dew, M.A.; DiMartini, A. Psychiatric aspects of organ transplantation and donation. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2015, 28, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zimbrean, P.; Emre, S. Patients with psychotic disorders in solid-organ transplant. Prog. Transplant. 2015, 25, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zipfel, S.; Schneider, A.; Wild, B.; Löwe, B.; Jünger, J.; Haass, M.; Sack, F.U.; Bergmann, G.; Herzog, W. Effect of depressive symptoms on survival after heart transplantation. Psychosom. Med. 2002, 64, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dew, M.A.; Kormos, R.L.; Roth, L.H.; Murali, S.; DiMartini, A.; Griffith, B.P. Early post-transplant medical compliance and mental health predict physical morbidity and mortality one to three years after heart transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 1999, 18, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heilmann, C.; Kaps, J.; Hartmann, A.; Zeh, W.; Anjarwalla, A.L.; Beyersdorf, F.; Siepe, M.; Joos, A. Mental health status of patients with mechanical aortic valves, with ventricular assist devices and after heart transplantation. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 23, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brown, C.R.; Chen, Z.; Khurshan, F.; Groeneveld, P.W.; Desai, N.D. Development of Persistent Opioid Use After Cardiac Surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brouwers, C.; Denollet, J.; de Jonge, N.; Caliskan, K.; Kealy, J.; Pedersen, S.S. Patient-reported outcomes in left ventricular assist device therapy: A systematic review and recommendations for clinical research and practice. Circ. Heart Fail. 2011, 4, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Willemsen, D.; Cordes, C.; Bjarnason-Wehrens, B.; Knoglinger, E.; Langheim, E.; Marx, R.; Reiss, N.; Schmidt, T.; Workowski, A.; Bartsch, P.; et al. Rehabilitationsstandards für die Anschlussheilbehandlung und allgemeine Rehabilitation von Patienten mit einem Herzunterstützungssystem (VAD—Ventricular assist device) [Rehabilitation standards for follow-up treatment and rehabilitation of patients with ventricular assist device (VAD)]. Clin. Res. Cardiol. Suppl. 2016, 11 (Suppl. 1), 2–49. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cook, J.L.; Colvin, M.; Francis, G.S.; Grady, K.L.; Hoffman, T.M.; Jessup, M.; John, R.; Kiernan, M.S.; Mitchell, J.E.; Pagani, F.D.; et al. Recommendations for the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Ambulatory and Community Patient Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e1145–e1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Diagnosis ICD codes used.
Table 1. Diagnosis ICD codes used.
DiagnosisICD Codes
Heart failure (LV failure)I50.1
VADZ95.811
Heart transplant listZ94.1
Heart transplant recipient33,945
DepressionF32, F33
Mood disorderF39
AnxietyF41.1
Panic disorderF41.0
PTSDF43.1
Adjustment disorderF43.2
Eating disordersF50
Somatoform disordersF50
ADHDF90
Opioid use disordersF11
Alcohol use disordersF10
Nicotine dependenceF17
DementiaF03
Suicidal ideation or self-harmR45.851, R45.88, T14.91, T50.902, X71-X83
Table 2. Propensity score matching for transplant waitlist versus heart failure patients.
Table 2. Propensity score matching for transplant waitlist versus heart failure patients.
CharacteristicBefore MatchingAfter Matching
Heart Failure PatientsTransplant List PatientsStandard DifferenceHeart Failure PatientsTransplant List PatientsStandard Difference
Age at index, years49.3 +/− 21.569.1 +/− 16.51.02949.4 +/− 21.564.6 +/− 18.70.755
Male163,210 (57.6%)20,259 (67.7%)0.20820,361 (68.1%)20,217 (67.6%)0.01
Race
  White148,374 (52.4%)17,628 (58.9%)0.13117,576 (58.8%)17,607 (58.9%)0.002
  American Indian or Alaska Native498 (0.2%)95 (0.3%)0.02999 (0.3%)95 (0.3%)0.002
  Pacific Islander1273 (0.4%)80 (0.3%)0.3190 (0.3%)80 (0.35)0.006
  Black or African American23,891 (8.4%)5130 (17.1%)0.2635291 (17.7%)5105 (17.1%)0.016
  Asian7954 (2.8%)658 (2.2%)0.39627 (2.1%)658 (2.2%)0.007
Essential hypertension130,274 (46.0%)10,664 (35.5%)0.21310,906 (36.5%)10,664 (35.7%)0.017
Neoplasms61,898 (21.9%)5867 (19.6%)0.0565808 (19.4%)5860 (19.6%)0.004
Diabetes mellitus72,647 (25.7%)7237 (24.2%)0.0347264 (24.3%)7224 (24.2%)0.003
Obesity and overweight45,565 (16.1%)4255 (14.2%)0.0524212 (14.1%)4249 (14.2%)0.004
Psychosocial stressors13,436 (4.7%)899 (3.0%)0.09856 (2.9%)899 (3.05)0.009
Chronic lower respiratory diseases60,391 (21.3%)4738 (15.8%)0.1424741 (15.9%)4735 (15.8%)0.001
Epilepsy or seizures6007 (2.1%)689 (2.3%)0.012661 (2.0%)686 (2.3%)0.017
Cerebral infarction19,796 (7.0%)1978 (6.6%)0.0151845 (6.2%)1974 (6.6%)0.018
Ischemic heart diseases109,963 (38.8%)9370 (31.3%)0.1599293 (31.1.%)9368 (31.3%)0.005
Heart failure96,068 (33.9%)13,166 (44.0%)0.20713,054 (43.7%)13,120 (43.9%)0.004
Atrial fibrillation and flutter69,909 (24.7%)6655 (22.2%)0.0586491 (21.7%)6638 (22.2%)0.012
Cardiomyopathy41,677 (14.7%)10,244 (34.2%)0.46610,140 (33.9%)10,198 (34.1%)0.004
Fibrosis and cirrhosis of the liver5393 (1.9%)1189 (4.0%)0.1231052 (3.5%)1173 (3.9%)0.021
Chronic kidney disease and acute kidney failure74,403 (26.3%)9736 (32.5%)0.1379711 (32.5%)9693 (32.4%)0.001
Number of patients283,18829,946 29,90029,900
Table 3. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in transplant waitlist patients versus heart failure patients.
Table 3. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in transplant waitlist patients versus heart failure patients.
Incidence Survival Analysis
DisorderIncidence in Cardiac Transplant Waitlist PatientsIncidence in Control (Heart Failure)p-Value for Incidence AnalysisHazard RatioHazard Ratio p-Value
Expressed as the Total Number in Propensity-Matched CohortExpressed as the Total Number in Propensity-Matched Cohort
Somatoform disorder 261/29,773144/29,7590.861.570.4
Anxiety1289/28,969505/29,2540.001 *1.7710.003 *
Panic disorder552/29,460260/29,5570.042 *1.4860.032 *
PTSD496/29,344205/29,6450.1171.6860.079
Adjustment disorder1495/28,298638/29,2690.00 *1.7420.00 *
Depression4293/25,1492194/25,8190.00 *1.50.00 *
Mood disorder 600/29,587281/29,5980.1261.4630.004 *
Nicotine dependence1459/27,6031292/24,8320.9130.7060.012 *
Alcohol use disorder 792/28,615785/27,6580.015 *0.6850.466
Opioid use495/29,621276/29,4600.1461.2610.00 *
Dementia 492/29,749895/29,1180.1260.2610.00 *
Eating disorder264/29,734144/29,7830.011 *1.2790.025 *
Self-harm 688/29,463574/29,3020.2510.8110.487
* p < 0.05.
Table 4. Propensity score matching for cardiac transplant versus heart failure patients.
Table 4. Propensity score matching for cardiac transplant versus heart failure patients.
CharacteristicBefore MatchingAfter Matching
Heart Failure
Patients
Transplant
Patients
Standard
Difference
Heart
Failure Patients
Transplant
Patients
Standard
Difference
Age at index, years68.9 +/− 16.744.8 +/− 20.91.27462.9 +/− 17.344.8 +/− 20.90.944
Male164,631 (57.7%)3344 (68.7%)0.2293360 (69.2%)3333 (68.7%)0.012
Race
  White149,310 (52.4%)3081 (63.3%)0.2233139 (64.7%)3071 (63.3%)0.029
  American Indian or Alaska Native507 (0.2%)10 (.2%)0.00611 (.2%)10 (0.2%)0.004
  Pacific Islander1281 (0.4%)10 (0.2%)0.04310 (0.2%)10 (0.2%)<0.001
  Black or African American24,349 (8.5%)1054 (21.7%)0.373991 (20.4%)1051 (21.6%)0.03
  Asian7967 (2.8%)84 (1.7%)0.07268 (1.4%)84 (1.7%)0.027
Essential hypertension131,365 (46.1%)2937 (60.3%)0.2892992 (61.6%)2937 (60.5%)0.023
Neoplasms62,477 (21.9%)1580 (32.5%)0.2391571 (32.4%)1577 (32.5%)0.003
Diabetes mellitus73,369 (25.7%)2106 (43.3%)0.3762099 (43.2%)2098 (43.2%)<0.001
Obesity and overweight46,002 (16.1%)1509 (31.0%)0.3561536 (31.6%)1506 (31.0%)0.013
Psychosocial stressors13,542 (4.7%)391 (8.0%)0.135348 (7.2%)391 (8.1%)0.033
Chronic lower respiratory diseases60,902 (21.4%)1339 (27.5%)0.1441333 (27.5%)1338 (27.6%)0.002
Epilepsy or seizures6062 (2.1%)208 (4.3%)0.122162 (3.3%)206 (4.2%)0.047
Cerebral infarction20,026 (7.0%)853 (17.5%)0.324774 (15.9%)848 (17.5%)0.041
Ischemic heart diseases111,021 (38.9%)3002 (61.7%)0.4673012 (62.0%)2999 (61.8%)0.006
Heart failure97,555 (34.2%)4512 (92.7%)1.5294483 (92.3%)4500 (92.7%)0.013
Atrial fibrillation and flutter70,600 (24.8%)2545 (52.3%)0.592475 (51.0%)2535 (52.2%)0.025
Cardiomyopathy42,890 (15.0%)4089 (84.0%)1.9054115 (84.8%)4077 (84.0%)0.022
Fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver5488 (1.9%)383 (7.9%)0.278357 (7.4%)372 (7.7%)0.012
Chronic kidney disease and acute kidney failure75,401 (26.4%)3411 (70.1%)0.9713389 (69.8%)3399 (70.0%)0.004
Number of patients285,2004867 48554855
Table 5. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in cardiac transplant versus heart failure patients.
Table 5. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in cardiac transplant versus heart failure patients.
Incidence Survival Analysis
DisorderIncidence in Post-Heart Transplant PatientsIncidence in Control
(Heart Failure)
p-Value
for Incidence
Hazard
Ratio
Hazard
p-Value
Expressed as the Total Number in the Propensity-Matched Cohort Expressed as the Total
Number in the Propensity-Matched Cohort
Somatoform disorder 66/482232/48100.4251.6440.845
Anxiety270/4531138/46580.3911.6030.059
Panic disorder109/465663/47570.291.3940.067
PTSD116/461272/47810.3461.3070.737
Adjustment disorder292/4108180/46330.0461.5270.00 *
Depression645/3416468/36420 *1.2170.094
Mood disorder 148/473695/47720.2613.1910.00 *
Nicotine dependence255/4233258/37080.1680.6710.281
Alcohol use disorder 134/4456184/42060.640.5540.072
Opioid use144/476967/47260.038 *1.7910.009 *
Dementia 48/4834168/46930.9930.2150.878
Eating disorder65/478242/48100.081.2340.462
Self-harm 134/4707174/46750.1230.6050.786
* p < 0.05.
Table 6. Propensity score matching for VAD versus heart failure patients.
Table 6. Propensity score matching for VAD versus heart failure patients.
CharacteristicBefore MatchingAfter Matching
Heart Failure
Patients
VAD
Patients
Standard
Difference
Heart
Failure Patients
VAD
Patients
Standard
Difference
Age at index, years34.1 +/− 20.361.3 +/− 16.41.46938.1 +/− 22.258.2 +/− 17.71.004
Male18,737 (34.6%)17,882 (66.6%)0.6756700 (62.9%)6435 (60.4%)0.051
Race
  White26,699 (50.3%)17,195 (64.0%)0.286320 (59.3%)6565 (61.6%)0.047
  American Indian or Alaska Native94 (0.2%)121 (0.5%)0.04953 (0.5%)48 (0.5%)0.007
  Pacific Islander52 (0.1%)63 (0.2%)0.3422 (0.2%)22 (0.2%)<0.001
  Black or African American9854 (18.6%)5629 (21%)0.062174 (20.4%)2096 (19.6%)0.018
  Asian2205 (4.2%)430 (1.6%)0.153238 (2.2%)225 (2.1%)0.008
Essential hypertension10,839 (20.4%)14,295 (53.2%)0.7233522 (33.0%)3163 (29.7%)0.073
Neoplasms8744 (16.5%)7244 (27%)0.2571927 (18.1%)1811 (17.0%)0.029
Diabetes mellitus5799 (10.9%)9246 (34.4%)0.5851892 (17.8%)1764 (16.5%)0.032
Obesity and overweight8238 (15.3%)7305 (27.2%)0.2931515 (14.2%)1536 (14.4%)0.006
Psychosocial stressors2631 (5.0%)1983 (7.4%)0.101468 (4.4%)449 (4.2%)0.009
Chronic lower respiratory diseases9088 (17.1%)6932 (25.8%)0.2131615 (15.2%)1595 (15.0%)0.005
Epilepsy or seizures1722 (3.2%)803 (3.0%)0.015322 (3.0%)275 (2.6%)0.027
Cerebral infarction1209 (2.3%)3359 (12.5%)0.399717 (6.7%)649 (6.1%)0.026
Ischemic heart diseases2482 (4.7%)14,479 (53.9%)1.2862028 (19.0%)1899 (17.8%)0.031
Heart failure1537 (2.9%)15,385 (57.3%)1.4721460 (13.7%)1551 (14.6%)0.025
Atrial fibrillation and flutter1005 (1.9%)9932 (36.2%)0.993915 (8.6%)1027 (9.6%)0.037
Cardiomyopathy774 (1.5%)9733 (36.2%)0.993722 (6.8%)869 (8.2%)0.052
Fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver606 (1.1%)929 (3.5%)0.155219 (2.1%)207 (1.9%)0.008
Chronic kidney disease and acute kidney failure2924 (5.5%)10,741 (40.0%)0.9021609 (15.1%)1477 (13.9%)0.035
Number of patients53,11926,866 10,65910,659
Table 7. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in VAD versus heart failure patients.
Table 7. Incidence of MHDs/ SUDs in VAD versus heart failure patients.
Incidence Survival Analysis
DisorderIncidence in VAD PatientsIncidence in
Control
(Heart Failure)
p-Value for
Incidence
Analysis
Hazard
Ratio
Hazard
Ratio
p-Value
Expressed as the Total Number in the Propensity-Matched Cohort Expressed as the Total Number in the Propensity-Matched Cohort
Somatoform disorder 62/10,59664/10,5680.7221.60.642
Anxiety265/10,341345/10,1200.011 *0.90.044 *
Panic disorder117/10,453127/10,4530.014 *1.10.013 *
PTSD125/10,456140/10,4480.0561.10.02 *
Adjustment disorder429/10,209226/10,3600.0872.30.00 *
Depression1035 /8849813/87500.003 *1.60.00 *
Mood disorder 174/10,50995/10,4960.2862.10.82
Nicotine dependence452/8868540/82260.2120.90.00 *
Alcohol use disorder 300/10,004239/98180.8731.40.00 *
Opioid use134/10,466206/10,2580.5630.740.001 *
Dementia 166/10,50071/10,5840.5982.750.138
Eating disorder63/10,59243/10,5690.7791.620.031 *
Self-harm 207/10,404145/10,4050.0571.70.03 *
* p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grzyb, C.; Du, D.; Mahesh, B.; Nair, N. Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113151

AMA Style

Grzyb C, Du D, Mahesh B, Nair N. Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(11):3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grzyb, Chloe, Dongping Du, Balakrishnan Mahesh, and Nandini Nair. 2024. "Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 11: 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113151

APA Style

Grzyb, C., Du, D., Mahesh, B., & Nair, N. (2024). Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(11), 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop