Schipper, J.-H.; Steven, D.; Lüker, J.; Wörmann, J.; van den Bruck, J.-H.; Filipovic, K.; Dittrich, S.; Scheurlen, C.; Erlhöfer, S.; Pavel, F.;
et al. Dipole Density Guided Catheter Ablation versus Conventional Substrate Modification for Repeat Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010223
AMA Style
Schipper J-H, Steven D, Lüker J, Wörmann J, van den Bruck J-H, Filipovic K, Dittrich S, Scheurlen C, Erlhöfer S, Pavel F,
et al. Dipole Density Guided Catheter Ablation versus Conventional Substrate Modification for Repeat Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(1):223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010223
Chicago/Turabian Style
Schipper, Jan-Hendrik, Daniel Steven, Jakob Lüker, Jonas Wörmann, Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck, Karlo Filipovic, Sebastian Dittrich, Cornelia Scheurlen, Susanne Erlhöfer, Friederike Pavel,
and et al. 2024. "Dipole Density Guided Catheter Ablation versus Conventional Substrate Modification for Repeat Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 1: 223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010223
APA Style
Schipper, J.-H., Steven, D., Lüker, J., Wörmann, J., van den Bruck, J.-H., Filipovic, K., Dittrich, S., Scheurlen, C., Erlhöfer, S., Pavel, F., & Sultan, A.
(2024). Dipole Density Guided Catheter Ablation versus Conventional Substrate Modification for Repeat Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010223
