Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: “Cardiovascular Complications in Renal Diseases”
Next Article in Special Issue
The Quality of Mother–Child Feeding Interactions Predicts Psychopathological Symptoms in Offspring and Mothers Seven Years Later: A Longitudinal Study on the General Population
Previous Article in Journal
A Cross-Sectional Study of Factors Influencing Pre-Operative Anxiety in Orthognathic Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Implementing Sensitivity and Contingency in Medical Contexts: The Case of Prematurity

Department of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5306; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165306
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 13 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
In the context of relational situations, sensitivity and contingency are identified as pivotal variables that contribute to the enhancement of patients’ overall wellbeing. Both physical and mental health are deeply affected by these factors. Caregivers, which encompass not only family members but also professionals dealing with situations of illness and distress, play a crucial role in fostering patients’ recovery [1,2].
The affective and relational skills of caregivers play a significant role in this process. When caregivers exhibit high levels of sensitivity, they are attuned to the emotional and psychological needs of their patients. They respond empathetically, providing comfort and understanding. On the other hand, contingency refers to the ability of caregivers to respond adaptively to the changing needs of patients. This responsiveness establishes a sense of security, predictability, and trust in the relationship [3].
Research suggests that the presence of sensitive and contingent caregiving can lead to accelerated recovery on both physical and mental fronts. Patients who receive such care are more likely to experience reduced stress, anxiety, and depression. Moreover, their physical healing processes may be expedited, potentially leading to shorter hospital stays and improved medical outcomes in different realms of physical conditions such as oncology, traumatic injuries, and cardiac problems [4,5].
This is particularly evident in cases of premature births, which have seen an increase in recent years due to various factors such as lifestyle changes, medical advancements, and environmental influences. Premature births are a notable area of study where the concepts of sensitivity and contingency have gained particular significance. Infants born prematurely often require specialized medical attention and care due to their underdeveloped physiological systems. In this context, the emotional and relational support provided by caregivers becomes even more critical. Sensitivity and contingency in caregiving can have a direct impact on the infant’s developmental trajectory, potentially mitigating the risks associated with preterm birth [6,7].
In general, the constructs of sensitivity and contingency hold a central place in the scientific exploration of psychology, developmental psychopathology, and clinical medicine. All these standpoints underscore the importance of nurturing responsive, empathetic, and adaptable caregiving relationships to enhance the wellbeing of patients across various stages of life [8,9,10,11].
Particularly in the case of premature births, these constructs can significantly influence the developmental outcomes of infants facing unique challenges.
Premature births, defined as births occurring before the completion of 37 weeks of gestation, have been identified as a significant contributor to various neurodevelopmental difficulties. These challenges can have lasting effects throughout an individual’s life cycle. From the early stages of infancy through later life, individuals born prematurely often require a unique and carefully tailored relational environment that is characterized by sensitivity and attentiveness to their needs.
Neurodevelopmental difficulties associated with premature birth can encompass a range of issues, including cognitive impairments, motor delays, behavioral challenges, and emotional regulation difficulties. These difficulties may persist into adulthood and impact an individual’s education, employment, and overall quality of life [12].
Given the distinct vulnerabilities that premature infants face, it becomes crucial to provide a relational environment that is attuned to their specific needs. In this context, caregiver sensitivity plays a pivotal role. Caregiver sensitivity refers to the ability of parents, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to accurately perceive and appropriately respond to the cues and needs of the infant, even when these cues might not be as overt as in full-term infants.
Research in this area has explored various techniques aimed at promoting caregiver sensitivity towards preterm infants. These techniques are particularly important because preterm infants might not yet have developed the ability to clearly manifest their needs and requirements. Psychodynamically oriented pre-term parenting support programs, for example, focus on enhancing parents’ and caregivers’ awareness and responsiveness to the unique needs of premature infants [13,14]. These programs often involve teaching caregivers how to interpret subtle cues, providing guidance on how to regulate their emotions, and facilitating a deeper understanding of the infant’s experiences.
The hospital setting, where premature infants often receive initial care, is a crucial context for the implementation of caregiver sensitivity techniques. Training caregivers in this environment is essential to ensure that they are equipped with the skills necessary to provide the best possible care for premature infants. Caregivers need support in expressing their own emotions, distinguishing their personal experiences from those of the premature baby, and managing any projections they might have onto the infant [15].
For instance, caregivers might experience feelings of guilt or inadequacy related to premature birth, which could hinder the formation of a healthy attachment bond. They might struggle to accept the reality of the situation, as it might differ significantly from their expectations of a “typical” birth experience. These complex emotions and projections can potentially impact the caregiver–infant relationship, underscoring the importance of addressing caregivers’ emotional needs as part of the support process [16].
In conclusion, premature births have been linked to neurodevelopmental difficulties that can span an individual’s life cycle. Creating a sensitive and attentive relational environment is essential for addressing the unique needs of these individuals. Techniques aimed at enhancing caregiver sensitivity, especially in psychodynamically oriented pre-term parenting support programs, can play a crucial role in improving outcomes for premature infants. Training caregivers, particularly within the hospital context, is vital for equipping them with the skills to navigate the complex emotions and challenges associated with premature birth and its impact on the caregiver–infant relationship [17].
Among the clinical approaches that foster the development of caregiver sensitivity and contingency, home visiting interventions are particularly interesting [18,19,20]. These are programs for the prevention of psycho-physical distress, which accompany families from the first months of a child’s life. Although there are still few experiences in Italy, in the Anglo-Saxon and American worlds, clinical approaches are widely used at the time of a patient’s discharge. It is a question of offering home treatment that allows the people involved in care and nursing to find new and more appropriate ways of communicating in the home context, which favor two-way communication, mutual emotional contact, and emerging states of affective synchronization.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gropen, T.I.; Gokaldas, R.; Poleshuck, R.; Spencer, J.; Janjua, N.; Szarek, M.; Brandler, E.S.; Levine, S.R. Factors related to the sensitivity of emergency medical service impression of stroke. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 2014, 18, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alharbi, J.; Jackson, D.; Usher, K. Compassion fatigue in critical care nurses and its impact on nurse-sensitive indicators in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Aust. Crit. Care 2020, 33, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McCaffrey, G.; McConnell, S. Compassion: A critical review of peer-reviewed nursing literature. J. Clin. Nurs. 2015, 24, 3006–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Frampton, S.B.; Guastello, S.; Lepore, M. Compassion as the foundation of patient-centered care: The importance of compassion in action. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 2013, 2, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, L.; Xiao, L.D.; Chamberlain, D.; Newman, P. Enablers and barriers in hospital-to-home transitional care for stroke survivors and caregivers: A systematic review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2021, 30, 2786–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Russell, G.; Sawyer, A.; Rabe, H.; Abbott, J.; Gyte, G.; Duley, L.; Ayers, S. Parents’ views on care of their very premature babies in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2014, 14, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Spittle, A.J.; Treyvaud, K.; Doyle, L.W.; Roberts, G.; Lee, K.J.; Inder, T.E.; Anderson, P.J. Early emergence of behavior and social-emotional problems in very preterm infants. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2009, 48, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lucarelli, L.; Ambruzzi, A.M.; Cimino, S.; Finistrella, F. Feeding disorders in infancy: An empirical study on mother-infant interactions. Minerva Pediatr. 2003, 55, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Lucarelli, L.; Sechi, C.; Cimino, S.; Chatoor, I. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: A longitudinal study of malnutrition and psychopathological risk factors from 2 to 11 years of age. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Erriu, M.; Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L. The role of family relationships in eating disorders in adolescents: A narrative review. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L.; Paciello, M.; Sinesi, S. A six-year prospective study on children of mothers with eating disorders: The role of paternal psychological profiles. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev. 2013, 21, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Saigal, S.; Doyle, L.W. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008, 371, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L.; Ballarotto, G.; Marzilli, E.; Pascale, E.; D’Addario, C.; Adriani, W.; Tambelli, R. DNA methylation at the DAT promoter and risk for psychopathology: Intergenerational transmission between school-age youths and their parents in a community sample. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L.; Porreca, A.; Ballarotto, G.; Marzilli, E.; Simonelli, A. Impact of parental binge eating disorder: Exploring children’s emotional/behavioral problems and the quality of parent–child feeding interactions. Infant Ment. Health J. 2018, 39, 552–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nosarti, C.; Nam, K.W.; Walshe, M.; Murray, R.M.; Cuddy, M.; Rifkin, L.; Allin, M.P. Preterm birth and structural brain alterations in early adulthood. NeuroImage Clin. 2014, 6, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dean, B.; Ginnell, L.; Boardman, J.P.; Fletcher-Watson, S. Social cognition following preterm birth: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 124, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L.; Ballarotto, G.; Marzilli, E.; Pascale, E.; D’Addario, C.; Adriani, W.; Maremmani, A.G.I.; Tambelli, R. Children’s dat1 polymorphism moderates the relationship between parents’ psychological profiles, children’s dat methylation, and their emotional/behavioral functioning in a normative sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cimino, S.; Cerniglia, L.; Porreca, A.; Simonelli, A.; Ronconi, L.; Ballarotto, G. Mothers and fathers with Binge Eating Disorder and their 18–36 months old children: A longitudinal study on parent-infant interactions and offspring’s emotional-behavioral profiles. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Ammaniti, M.; Lucarelli, L.; Cimino, S.; D’Olimpio, F. Intergenerational transmission: Early feeding disorders and maternal psychopathology. Devenir 2004, 16, 173–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azzi-Lessing, L. Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions. Early Child. Res. Q. 2011, 26, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cimino, S. Implementing Sensitivity and Contingency in Medical Contexts: The Case of Prematurity. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5306. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165306

AMA Style

Cimino S. Implementing Sensitivity and Contingency in Medical Contexts: The Case of Prematurity. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(16):5306. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cimino, Silvia. 2023. "Implementing Sensitivity and Contingency in Medical Contexts: The Case of Prematurity" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 16: 5306. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop