Next Article in Journal
Association between Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Early Neurological Outcomes after Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Parent-Reported Food Allergy in a Mexican Pre-School Population
Previous Article in Journal
Cerebral Perfusion and Neuromonitoring during Complex Aortic Arch Surgery: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Role of Alarmins in Food Allergy: An Update on Pathophysiological Insights, Potential Use as Disease Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm12103472
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages

by
Maria Pasioti
1,2,*,
Maria Savva
1,
John Lakoumentas
1,
Evangelia Kompoti
3,
Michael Makris
4,
Paraskevi Xepapadaki
1 and
Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
1,5
1
Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens General Children’s Hospital Panagioti and Aglaia Kyriakou, Thivon & Levadias, Ambelokipoi, 115 27 Athens, Greece
2
Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Fidippidou Street, 4th Floor, Goudi, 115 27 Athens, Greece
3
Allergology Department, “Laikon” General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
4
Allergy Unit ‘D. Kalogeromitros’, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University General Hospital “Attikon”, 124 62 Chaidari, Greece
5
Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3472; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103472
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Revised: 5 May 2023 / Accepted: 6 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Allergy: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tree nut and/or peanut allergy impairs patients’ quality of life, but data on the impact of age and the type of nut or peanut on the quality of life are lacking. To evaluate the impact at different ages, age-appropriate survey questionnaires accompanied by FAQLQ and FAIM were distributed to patients with suspected tree nut and/or peanut allergy who presented at the allergy departments of three hospitals in Athens. Out of 200 questionnaires distributed, 106 met the inclusion criteria (46 children, 26 teenagers, 34 adults). The median score of each age group for FAQLQ was 4.6 (3.3–5.1), 4.7 (3.9–5.5), and 3.9 (3.2–5.1) and for FAIM was 3.7 (3.0–4.0), 3.4 (2.8–4.0), and 3.2 (2.7–4.1), respectively. FAQLQ and FAIM scores were correlated with the reported probability of using the rescue anaphylaxis set upon reaction (15.4%, p = 0.04 and 17.8%, p = 0.02, respectively) and pistachio allergy (FAQLQ: 4.8 vs. 4.0, p = 0.04; FAIM: 3.5 vs. 3.2, p = 0.03). Patients with additional food allergies reported worse FAQLQ scores (4.6 vs. 3.8, p = 0.05). Worse FAIM scores were associated with younger age (−18.2%, p = 0.01) and the number of life-threatening allergic reactions (25.3%, p < 0.001). The overall impact of tree nut and/or peanut allergy on patients’ quality of life is moderate but differs with age, the type of nut, the use of adrenaline, and the number of previous reactions. The aspects of life affected and contributed factors also vary across age groups.

1. Introduction

Tree nut and/or peanut allergy (TNPA) is usually a lifelong, potentially life-threatening, disease [1] and represents one of the most common causes of food-induced hospital admissions and deaths [2]. Standard management includes strict avoidance of the culprit nut and rescue medication, mainly adrenaline, in case of anaphylaxis due to accidental exposure [3]. Oral immunotherapy has recently been approved as an alternative management of peanut allergy in children [4].
The worldwide prevalence of tree nut allergy is estimated between 0.05% and 4.9%. In Europe, the self-reported lifetime prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy is 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively, with hazelnut being the most frequently implicated tree nut [1]. However, the prevalence of confirmed by oral food challenges TNPA is 0.2% and 0.5% [5].
Besides health issues, food allergy, similar to other chronic conditions, affects patients’ quality of life (QoL) [6,7]. The necessity of daily restrictions imposes a significant burden on patients’ daily lives, induces stress and anxiety, and subsequently affects their social life [8,9,10,11], especially in patients with peanut allergy [9]. A history of life-threatening and/or multiple previous allergic reactions, parental anxiety, and uncertainty about managing accidental reactions imposes an increased psychological burden [12,13,14]. Regarding tree nuts, data from a single study indicate a significant emotional and psychosocial burden in children [15].
Greece is a country with a low incidence of food allergy and equally low public awareness [16]. Although allergy services are provided by highly specialized practitioners in academic, public, and private settings, Greek adults reported worse levels of QoL than other European patients with food allergies [16,17]. There is no reported data regarding specifically the QoL of Greek patients with TNPA. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the impact of presumed TNPA (pTNPA) on QoL and possible associated factors.

2. Materials and Methods

To assess the QoL of patients with pTNPA, we utilized the Greek versions of the food allergy quality of life questionnaire for children aged 8–12 years old (FAQLQ-CF) [18], teenagers (FAQLQ-TF) [19], and adults (FAQLQ-AF) [20], with answers on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = no impairment, 2 = barely, 3 = a little bit, 4 = fairly, 5 = quite, 6 = very, 7 = extreme). The food allergy independent measure (FAIM), consisting of six questions on a 7-point Likert scale (1–7), was used as an independent measure based on patients’ expectations of food allergic outcomes upon accidental reactions due to their food allergy [21]. FAQLQ and FAIM questionnaires were self-completed by patients of every age.
FAQLQ-CF included the following domains: allergen avoidance (AA), dietary restrictions (DR), risk of accidental exposure (RAE), and emotional impact (EI). FAQLQ-TF included three domains: allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions (AADR), RAE, and EI, while FAQLQ-AF had four domains: AADR, EI, RAE, and food allergy related health (FAH).
Participants’ demographic information and allergy history were collected through three standardized age-appropriate survey questionnaires. These questionnaires were completed by teenage and adult patients and the parents of children aged 8–12 years old.
To clinically interpret the questionnaires’ results, we classified scores <4 as minor clinical importance, whereas scores ranging from 4 to 7 indicated major clinical importance. FAIM, FAQLQ total, and specific domain scores were investigated for correlations with factors assessed in the survey questionnaire.
Eligible for participation were Greek-speaking patients of both sexes who visited the Allergy Department of the 2nd Pediatric Clinic of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Panagiotis and Aglaia Kyriakou” Children’s Hospital, and the collaborating centers of the allergology department of “Laiko” General Hospital and the allergy unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon Hospital, all located in Athens, between June 2018 and February 2020. All patients who reported avoiding at least one tree nut (walnut, pistachio, cashew, hazelnut, almond) or peanut because of an assumed IgE-mediated allergy were invited to participate after receiving oral and written information indicating the purpose of the study. Participation was anonymous and voluntary.

3. Statistical Analysis

All numerical answers and outcomes based on the given questionnaires were considered non-parametric continuous variables in the statistical analysis. Non-normality was validated with the Shapiro–Wilk test for composite normality. Descriptive statistics were given in the form of median (Q1–Q3) for the continuous variables and as count (%) for the discrete ones. To assess differences across age groups, Pearson’s chi-squared test of independence was performed for qualitative variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for quantitative variables. Pairwise non-parametric correlations of scale variables were estimated with the Kendall’s tau correlation estimator. The 30% and 50% cut-offs were used to characterize a correlation estimate as low, moderate, or high. Associations between the Likert-scaled variables and discrete factors were examined with Wilcoxon’s rank sum test.
All statistical tests were taken as two-sided and statistical significance was considered at the level of 5%. Missing values were not imputed. The statistical analysis was held in R and RStudio, both of which are open-source products.
Separate analyses were conducted to include patients with suspected allergy only to a single nut. Using the Mann–Whitney test, we compared these patients’ total FAQLQ and FAIM scores.
To estimate correlations between the type of nut and the QoL of patients with pTNPA, cashew and pistachio were considered as one nut. In clinical practice, patients with allergy to cashew or pistachio are advised to avoid both nuts because of their common biological heritage (Anacardiaceae family) [22,23]. Regarding the walnut family, we only addressed walnut allergy, as other members of the walnut family such as pecan are uncommon in Greek culinary habits. However, as part of our questionnaire, participants were asked to also respond to an open question regarding allergies to other nuts; none of the patients were allergic to pecan.
Surveys missing more than 20% of answers per questionnaire were excluded from the analysis.

4. Results

4.1. Characteristics of the Study Participants

In total, from the 127 questionnaires distributed, 121 were obtained, of which 106 (46 from children, 26 from teenagers, and 34 from adults) were included in this analysis (Supplementary Figure S1). In the total cohort, the median patient age was 14 years old (CI: 10–18) and 69 were males (65.7%). Most patients reported either allergy to pistachio and cashew: n = 67 (64.4%) and n = 64 (61.5%), respectively, or previous reactions: pistachio: 39 participants (42.9%) and cashew: 36 (39.6%). Descriptive data, including demographic, personal history of allergy-associated diseases, and information regarding reaction to all tree nuts, are depicted in Table 1.

4.2. FAQLQ and FAIM Scores

The median FAQLQ and FAIM scores of the total cohort and by age group are shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1.

4.3. Factors Correlating with QoL

In the total sample, older age was associated with slightly better (lower) FAIM scores (−18.2%, p = 0.01). Patients with additional food allergies presented worse FAQLQ scores than those with only pTNPA (4.6 vs. 3.8, respectively, p = 0.05). FAQLQ and FAIM scores were significantly correlated with the reported probability of using the rescue anaphylaxis set upon reaction (15.4%, p = 0.04 and 17.8%, p = 0.02, respectively). The FAIM score also positively correlated to the number of life-threatening allergic reactions reported (25.3%, p < 0.001).
Patients allergic to pistachio had worse (higher) FAQLQ and FAIM scores than patients whose nut panel did not include pistachio (FAQLQ: 4.8 vs. 4.0, p = 0.04; FAIM: 3.5 vs. 3.2, p = 0.03). The total FAQLQ and FAIM scores by age group and type of allergen are demonstrated in Supplementary Table S1. A subgroup analysis, including participants who reported allergy only to a single nut, showed that assumed pistachio or cashew allergy was associated with worse FAQLQ (5.0 vs. 3.0, respectively, p < 0.01) and FAIM (3.8 vs. 2.8, respectively, p < 0.01) scores. On the contrary, patients with suspected walnut allergy had better FAQLQ (2.7 vs. 4.8, p = 0.02) and FAIM (2.5 vs. 3.7, p = 0.01) scores than patients with other pTNPA (Supplementary Table S2).
Regarding children, presumed allergy to walnut, among other nuts, was associated with better (lower) overall FAQLQ scores than those allergic to nuts other than walnut (4.2 vs. 4.9, p = 0.02), better risk of accidental exposure scores (3.5 vs. 4.6, p = 0.01), and better emotional impact scores (4.3 vs. 6.2, p < 0.01). Children with previous allergic reactions to walnut also scored lower in the domain of emotional impact (4.1 vs. 6.0, p < 0.01) and the overall FAQLQ score (3.6 vs. 4.9, p = 0.03) compared with children who reported reactions to any tree nut and/or peanut other than walnut.
Higher dietary restrictions scores were associated with the probability of using an anaphylactic set (24.0%, p = 0.04). The number of nuts the child was allergic to negatively and moderately correlated with the risk of accidental exposure score (−22.4%, p = 0.05). Notably, the pediatric FAIM score was correlated with the number of life-threatening anaphylactic experiences (42.4%, p < 0.01) and the times when an adrenaline injection was administered (53.9%, p = 0.05). The number of life-threatening experiences was positively related to higher emotional impact scores in children (28.7%, p = 0.05).
In poly-nut allergic teenagers, suspected allergy to pistachio or almond correlated with worse FAQLQ scores (5.0 vs. 3.4, p = 0.05 and 5.5 vs. 4.5 p < 0.01, respectively) and worse allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions scores (5.2 vs. 2.9, p = 0.02 and 5.8 vs. 4.8, p = 0.01, respectively). Patients with co-allergy to almond among other nuts had worse FAIM, risk of accidental exposure, and emotional impact scores (4.0 vs. 3.2, p = 0.04, 5.2 vs. 4.1, p = 0.01, and 5.6 vs. 4.3, p = 0.03, respectively).
The presence of additional food allergies in teenagers was associated with worse (higher) FAQLQ (5.4 vs. 4.4, p = 0.03), allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions (5.6 vs. 4.3, p = 0.01), and risk of accidental exposure scores (5.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.04).
The FAIM scores were also strongly and positively correlated with the number of life-threatening experiences reported (52.3%, p = 0.01).
In adults, females had worse (higher) scores in FAQLQ (4.6 vs. 3.0, p = 0.01), risk of accidental exposure (4.1 vs. 2.8, p = 0.02), emotional impact (4.3 vs. 3.1, p < 0.01), food allergy related health (4.8 vs. 3.3, p < 0.01), and FAIM (3.5 vs. 2.7, p = 0.03) than males.
Additionally, in adults, greater availability of the treatment set and greater probability of using it were correlated with worse scores in FAQLQ (49.8%, p = 0.001 and 37.5%, p < 0.01), allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions (52.4%, p < 0.001 and 42.9%, p < 0.01), risk of accidental exposure (47.1%, p < 0.01 and 34.5%, p = 0.02), food allergy related health (31.5%, p = 0.04 and 30.0%, p = 0.04), and FAIM (30.3%, p = 0.05 and 37.1%, p = 0.01), while worse emotional impact scores correlated with greater availability of treatment set only (36.7%, p = 0.02).
Adults who reported previous use of adrenaline had better (lower) food allergy related health scores compared with those who had never used adrenaline before (2.3 vs. 4.3, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the adult participants with additional food allergies had worse scores in FAQLQ (4.3 vs. 2.9, p = 0.04) and allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions (4.9 vs. 3.0, respectively, p = 0.02) than those with pTNPA only. Finally, adults who reported allergy to cashew, among other nuts, had better food allergy related health scores than those who were allergic to nuts other than cashew (3.3 vs. 4.5, p = 0.05).

5. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the effect of suspected peanut and tree nut allergy on the quality of life across age groups. Our results show that pTNPA moderately affects the QoL of life of patients, with teenagers reporting the worst outcomes and adults the best. In children, the most affected domain is the emotional impact (EI), indicating a fear of accidental reactions and frustration with their allergy. This finding should be a concern to both healthcare and education professionals, regarding the way they handle and communicate the potential impact and danger of TNPA to children causing a greater emotional burden. In teenagers and adults, QoL is mainly affected by the constant vigilance that is essential for safe food choices and the limitations in social life, as reflected in allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions (AADR). Adolescence is a stage of life where teenagers start to take responsibility for their allergy management and develop their own social life. Therefore, the intense frustration they experience because of the daily restrictions could be responsible for the greater impact on their QoL.
The correlation between QoL, the availability of an anaphylaxis rescue set, and the probability of using it when in need has not been reported before. Patients with an increased QoL burden and those who perceived their allergy as more severe reported a higher likelihood of using their anaphylaxis set upon reaction. That finding was more pronounced in adults and consistent in all domains of FAQLQ. It is plausible that patients who have experienced life-threatening reactions consider themselves to be suffering from severe allergy and expect to experience a threatening outcome upon accidental exposure (higher FAIM and EI scores). These patients report difficulties in complying with allergen avoidance (higher RAE score), which affects their food choices and social activities (higher AADR score) and renders them anxious about their wellbeing (higher FAH score). Of course, reverse causation, e.g., the need to have on hand the anaphylaxis set all the time might impact the FAQLQ scores, cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, Cummings et al. [15] did not find any differences in QoL regarding whether the child carried the prescribed auto-injector or not.
Another novel finding is the correlation of specific tree nuts with QoL. Presumed allergy to pistachio and almond was found to impose a significant burden on patients’ QoL and their perception of the severity of their allergy. This effect was more profound in teenagers. Reported walnut allergy was associated with better QoL scores, especially in children. In the adult population, assumed cashew allergy was correlated with better scores in the food allergy related health domain. The effect of food allergies, in general, and TNPA on patients’ QoL could vary substantially between countries with different culinary customs, suggesting that results are better interpreted in the specific geographic and cultural context [17,24].
Pistachio and cashew nuts are known to cause severe allergic reactions, even in traces [25,26]. Pistachio is widely used in Greek pastry and is a typical snack; it is also used in many prepacked foods. Consequently, an allergy to Anacardiaceae usually manifests as an allergy to pistachio and patients are thereafter advised to avoid cashew and pistachio. The difficulties in complying with pistachio avoidance are reflected in the allergy avoidance and dietary restriction (AADR) scores. On the other hand, cashew is not typically used in the Greek diet; ready-to-eat sauces, prepacked, and restaurant meals are the primary cause of accidental ingestion, the avoidance of which does not negatively affect the patient’s overall health. Almond, although seldomly causes severe allergic reactions [27], is widely used in the Greek diet. Regarding walnut allergy, many Greek patients report symptoms in the context of LTP syndrome, where traces usually do not cause reactions [28]. The milder clinical manifestations of LTP syndrome, compared with the severe anaphylaxis episodes caused by pistachio and/or cashew accidental consumption, reflect the different perception in the FAQLQ scores. Although walnut represents a common ingredient in desserts, it is infrequently used in standardized products and traces for pediatric consumption, facilitating its avoidance.
In our study population, younger patients perceived their allergy more frequently as severe. This finding has been reported before [15,29] and might reflect the fact that older patients are familiar with coping with their allergies.
In the adult population, females reported significantly greater impairment in almost every aspect of QoL than males. This was in line with previous studies [30], showing that the burden of food allergy more greatly affects the female population. This was not the case in children and adolescents, even though other studies have reported sex and gender differences in QoL of younger patients with food allergy [15,30,31,32], possibly because of the male dominance in our pediatric and adolescent population. The impact of sex in allergic diseases has been reported before and has been attributed to the influence of sex steroids on immune responses [33,34]. Additionally, females may experience worse QoL because of gender differences in coping strategies, risk evaluation, and role expectations compared to males [35].
In children, the reverse association between the number of tree nuts and the risk of accidental exposure (RAE) scores indicates that the more tree nuts the child is allergic to the less the child is affected by the risk of accidental exposure. Although this finding seems contradictory, children allergic to more nuts are usually advised to avoid all nuts and traces, minimizing the risk of accidental exposure.
We did not find any association between the number or the severity of reactions (assessed by adrenaline use or the experience of a life-threatening reaction) and the FAQLQ scores, in line with some previous studies on food allergy [30,31,36] or TNPA [9,15]. The experience of a life-threatening reaction correlated with FAIM scores, as expected. The number of reactions treated with adrenaline was also correlated with the FAIM score in children. On the other hand, adults who had ever used adrenaline to treat a reaction reported better FAH scores than those who had never used adrenaline. That finding can indicate that the experience of self-administered adrenaline confers the patients with the confidence of being capable of treating an allergic reaction. Nevertheless, Acaster et al. [12] reported that parents of children with peanut allergy stated a higher burden on their child’s life depending on the number and severity of reactions, while Pinczower et al. [10] reported that experiencing anaphylaxis deteriorated the QoL of children with food allergies. In our population, there were few reactions reported. We might have failed to show an association because there were few reports about life-threatening reactions and adrenaline use in our population. On the other hand, it is possible that, in tree nut and peanut allergy, the constant vigilance required to avoid reactions has a more considerable effect on patients’ QoL than the reactions themselves.
In our population, the prescription of an adrenaline auto-injector did not affect patients’ QoL. Previous studies [10,15,37] have reported conflicting results regarding the prescription of auto-injectors and the QoL of patients. Cummings et al. [15] found that the prescription of an auto-injector improved the QoL of mothers but had no effect on the QoL of their children. On the other hand, Pinczower et al. [10] and, more recently, Warrent et al. [37] found worse QoL in patients with food allergies being prescribed adrenaline. Finally, Saleh-Langenberg et al. [30] did not find any association between the QoL of patients with food allergy and being prescribed an auto-injector.
There are certain limitations in our study. The questionnaires used (FAQLQ.FAIM) were not explicitly designed for TNPA, while the Greek translation has only been validated for the pediatric and adult forms [17,38]. Nevertheless, these questionnaires have been used widely for peanut and tree nut allergy [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], making results comparable. Although not officially validated in Greek, the teenage forms consisted of similar vocabulary as the pediatric and adult forms and participants did not report any comprehension difficulties.
Another potential limitation of this study was the relatively small sample size for the subgroup analysis conducted based on the single type of tree nut and/or peanut the participants were allergic to, as most of the patients reported multiple pTNPA.
Participants in this study were recruited among patients visiting an allergy unit for reported TNPA, whose allergy was not necessarily objectively diagnosed by a healthcare professional. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of them falsely presumed that they, or their children, suffered from TNPA. Nevertheless, the existing literature suggests that the impact of food allergy does not seem to differ between children whose parents perceive that they have food allergy and those who are confirmed as allergic to a particular food [47], hence we believe that our results do reflect the real burden of TNPA on QoL. The same stands for information regarding allergic reactions, treatment required, and allergic comorbidities. As this was an anonymous and self-reported survey, validation of the data was not possible. On the other hand, patients attending specialized centers for food allergy tend to report better QoL than unselected patients with the same diagnosis [46]. Finally, we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the burden reported was due to other food allergies, since the FAQLQ.FAIM scores were significantly worse in patients with co-existing food allergies.
This is the first study on the impact of pTNPA on QoL to include participants of all ages, with self-reported data even from children, investigating possible associated factors, including the type of tree nut. Our findings on pTNPA’s burden on patients’ QoL are similar to the impact of peanut allergy, as reported by Acaster et al. [12], and allergy to staple foods (cows’ milk, hens’ eggs, and wheat), as reported by Protudjer et al. [48].
Although the impact of current diagnostic procedures, such as the oral prοvocational tests, has not been within the scope of our study, we assume that they may also affect patients’ QoL. A recent systematic review by Kansen et al. [49] suggests that oral food challenge is associated with improved QoL of patients with food allergy and reduced parental burden. The present strategies of TNPA management could benefit from the results of our study. As there is currently no cure for food allergy, oral immunotherapy focuses on increasing the threshold and decreasing the severity of accidental reactions, which may presumably improve patients’ lives. Unveiling the factors that contribute to patient wellbeing helps to better recognize those who will benefit best from the new approaches.

6. Conclusions

Albeit tree nut and peanut allergy can lead to potentially life-threatening allergic reactions, its overall impact on the quality of life of patients is moderate, with teenagers and children affected more than adults. The domains affected vary according to different ages and by the nuts to which the patient is allergic. The finding that presumed pistachio and almond (which are widely used in Greece) allergies are associated with worse QoL, indicates that the surveillance required to avoid reaction may affect patients more than the reactions themselves. To support this, the experience of a life-threatening reaction affected patients’ perception of the severity of the allergy and no other domains of their life. Gender seems to play an additional role, with women affected more than men, at least in adult life. As there is currently no cure for food allergy, unveiling the factors that contribute to patient wellbeing helps in the design of better management approaches.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm12103472/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and N.G.P.; methodology, M.P.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, M.P.; data curation, M.P., E.K. and M.M.; writing—original draft, M.P. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, E.K., M.M., P.X. and N.G.P.; supervision, P.X. and N.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Hellenic Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (HSACI).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by The Ethics Committee of P&A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital (13552/08.08.19).

Informed Consent Statement

Oral informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request due to restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

TNPATree nut and/or peanut allergy
pTNPAPresumed tree nut and/or peanut allergy
QoLQuality of life
CFChild form
TFTeenager form
AFAdult form
FAQLQFood allergy quality of life questionnaire
FAIMFood allergy independent measures
AAAllergen avoidance (AA)
DRDietary restrictions
AADRAllergen avoidance and dietary restrictions
RAERisk of accidental exposure
EIEmotional impact
FAHFood allergy related health

References

  1. McWilliam, V.L.; Perrett, K.; Dang, T.; Peters, R.L. Prevalence and natural history of tree nut allergy. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020, 124, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Conrado, A.B.; Ierodiakonou, D.; Gowland, M.H.; Boyle, R.J.; Turner, P.J. Food anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom: Analysis of national data, 1998–2018. BMJ 2021, 372, n251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eigenmann, P.A.; Lack, G.; Mazon, A.; Nieto, A.; Haddad, D.; Brough, H.A.; Caubet, J.-C. Managing Nut Allergy: A Remaining Clinical Challenge. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2017, 5, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dunlop, J.H. Oral immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy. J. Investig. Med. 2020, 68, 1152–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nwaru, B.I.; Hickstein, L.; Panesar, S.S.; Roberts, G.; Muraro, A.; Sheikh, A. Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2014, 69, 992–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Frachette, C.; Fina, A.; Fontas, E.; Donzeau, D.; Hoflack, M.; Gastaud, F.; Baechler, E.; Dor, E.; Descos, B.; Triolo, V.; et al. Health-related quality of life of food-allergic children compared with healthy controls and other diseases. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2022, 33, e13663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blok, B.M.J.F.-D.; Dubois, A.E.J.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Elberink, J.N.G.O.; Raat, H.; DunnGalvin, A.; Hourihane, J.O.; Duiverman, E.J. Health-related quality of life of food allergic patients: Comparison with the general population and other diseases. Allergy 2010, 65, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blumchen, K.; DunnGalvin, A.; Timmermans, F.; Regent, L.; Schnadt, S.; Podestà, M.; Sánchez, A.; Couratier, P.; Feeney, M.; Hjorth, B.; et al. APPEAL-1: A pan-European survey of patient/caregiver perceptions of peanut allergy management. Allergy 2020, 75, 2920–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. DunnGalvin, A.; Gallop, K.; Acaster, S.; Timmermans, F.; Regent, L.; Schnadt, S.; Podestà, M.; Sánchez, A.; Ryan, R.; Couratier, P.; et al. APPEAL-2: A pan-European qualitative study to explore the burden of peanut-allergic children, teenagers and their caregivers. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2020, 50, 1238–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pinczower, G.D.; Bertalli, N.A.; Bussmann, N.; Hamidon, M.; Allen, K.J.; DunnGalvin, A.; Hourihane, J.O.; Gurrin, L.C.; Tang, M.L. The effect of provision of an adrenaline autoinjector on quality of life in children with food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 238–240.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stockhammer, D.; Katelaris, C.H.; Simpson, M.D.; Vanniasinkam, T. Parent perceptions in managing children with food allergy: An Australian perspective. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Acaster, S.; Gallop, K.; De Vries, J.; Ryan, R.; Vereda, A.; Knibb, R.C. Peanut allergy impact on productivity and quality of life (PAPRIQUA): Caregiver-reported psychosocial impact of peanut allergy on children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2020, 50, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yilmaz, E.A.; Cavkaytar, O.; Buyuktiryaki, B.; Soyer, O.; Sahiner, U.M.; E Sekerel, B.; DunnGalvin, A.; Karabulut, E.; Sackesen, C. Factors Affecting Food Allergy-Related Quality of Life From Parents’ Perception in Turkish Children. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2018, 10, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roy, K.M.; Roberts, M.C. Peanut allergy in children: Relationships to health-related quality of life, anxiety, and parental stress. Clin. Pediatr. Phila 2011, 50, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cummings, A.J.; Knibb, R.C.; Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, M.; King, R.M.; Roberts, G.; Lucas, J.S.A. Management of nut allergy influences quality of life and anxiety in children and their mothers. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2010, 21 4 Pt 1, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sampath, V.; Abrams, E.M.; Adlou, B.; Akdis, C.; Akdis, M.; Brough, H.A.; Chan, S.; Chatchatee, P.; Chinthrajah, R.S.; Cocco, R.R.; et al. Food allergy across the globe. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goossens, N.J.; Blok, B.M.F.-D.; van der Meulen, G.N.; Arnlind, M.H.; Asero, R.; Barreales, L.; Burney, P.; Cerecedo, I.; Clausen, M.; Fernandéz-Rivas, M.; et al. Health-related quality of life in food-allergic adults from eight European countries. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014, 113, 63–68.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Flokstra-de Blok, B.M.; DunnGalvin, A.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Oude Elberink, J.N.; Duiverman, E.J.; Hourihane, J.O.; Dubois, A.E.J. Development and validation of a self-administered Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire for children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Flokstra-de Blok, B.M.; DunnGalvin, A.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Oude Elberink, J.N.; Duiverman, E.J.; Hourihane, J.O.; Dubois, A.E.J. Development and validation of the self-administered Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire for adolescents. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 139–144, 144.e1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Flokstra-de Blok, B.M.; van der Meulen, G.N.; DunnGalvin, A.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Oude Elberink, J.N.; Duiverman, E.J.; Hourihane, J.O.; Dubois, A.E.J. Development and validation of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire—Adult Form. Allergy 2009, 64, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. van der Velde, J.L.; Flokstra-de Blok, B.M.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Oude Elberink, J.N.; DunnGalvin, A.; Hourihane, J.O.; Duiverman, E.J.; Dubois, A.E.J. Development, validity and reliability of the food allergy independent measure (FAIM). Allergy 2010, 65, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brough, H.A.; Caubet, J.-C.; Mazon, A.; Haddad, D.; Bergmann, M.M.; Wassenberg, J.; Panetta, V.; Gourgey, R.; Radulovic, S.; Nieto, M.; et al. Defining challenge-proven coexistent nut and sesame seed allergy: A prospective multicenter European study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Weinberger, T.; Sicherer, S. Current perspectives on tree nut allergy: A review. J. Asthma Allergy 2018, 11, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Goossens, N.J.; Blok, B.M.J.F.-D.; Vlieg-Boerstra, B.J.; Duiverman, E.J.; Weiss, C.C.; Furlong, T.J.; Dubois, A.E.J. Online version of the food allergy quality of life questionnaire-adult form: Validity, feasibility and cross-cultural comparison. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Elizur, A.; Appel, M.Y.; Nachshon, L.; Levy, M.B.; Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Golobov, K.; Goldberg, M.R. NUT Co Reactivity-Acquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT CRACKER) study. Allergy 2018, 73, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Purington, N.; Chinthrajah, R.S.; Long, A.; Sindher, S.; Andorf, S.; O’Laughlin, K.; Woch, M.A.; Scheiber, A.; Assa’Ad, A.; Pongracic, J.; et al. Eliciting Dose and Safety Outcomes From a Large Dataset of Standardized Multiple Food Challenges. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Baker, M.G.; Kattan, J.D. Review of 400 consecutive oral food challenges to almond. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019, 122, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elizur, A.; Appel, M.Y.; Nachshon, L.; Levy, M.B.; Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Pontoppidan, B.; Lidholm, J.; Goldberg, M.R. Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Walnut and Pecan Allergy (NUT CRACKER Study). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 8, 157–165.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marklund, B.; Ahlstedt, S.; Nordstrom, G. Health-related quality of life in food hypersensitive schoolchildren and their families: Parents’ perceptions. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2006, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saleh-Langenberg, J.; Goossens, N.J.; Blok, B.M.J.F.-D.; Kollen, B.J.; van der Meulen, G.N.; Le, T.M.; Knulst, A.C.; Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz, M.; Kowalski, M.L.; Rokicka, E.; et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life of European food-allergic patients. Allergy 2015, 70, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jonsson, M.; Ekström, S.; Protudjer, J.L.P.; Bergström, A.; Kull, I. Living with Food Hypersensitivity as an Adolescent Impairs Health Related Quality of Life Irrespective of Disease Severity: Results from a Population-Based Birth Cohort. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Marklund, B.; Ahlstedt, S.; Nordstrom, G. Health-related quality of life among adolescents with allergy-like conditions—With emphasis on food hypersensitivity. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2004, 2, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jarvis, D.; Burney, P. ABC of allergies. The epidemiology of allergic disease. BMJ 1998, 316, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Osman, M. Therapeutic implications of sex differences in asthma and atopy. Arch. Dis. Child. 2003, 88, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. DunnGalvin, A.; Hourihane, J.O.; Frewer, L.; Knibb, R.C.; Oude Elberink, J.N.G.; Klinge, I. Incorporating a gender dimension in food allergy research: A review. Allergy 2006, 61, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bollinger, M.E.; Dahlquist, L.M.; Mudd, K.; Sonntag, C.; Dillinger, L.; McKenna, K. The impact of food allergy on the daily activities of children and their families. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006, 96, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Warren, C.; Dyer, A.; Lombard, L.; Dunn-Galvin, A.; Gupta, R. The Psychosocial Burden of Food Allergy Among Adults: A US Population-Based Study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 2452–2460.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Morou, Z.; Lyrakos, G.N.; Papadopoulos, N.G.; Douladiris, N.; Tatsioni, A.; Dimoliatis, I.D. Translation, Adaptation and Initial Validation of Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire: Child form in Greek. Health Psychol. Res. 2016, 4, 4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antolín-Amérigo, D.; Manso, L.; Caminati, M.; Caballer, B.D.L.H.; Cerecedo, I.; Muriel, A.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M.; Barbarroja-Escudero, J.; Sánchez-González, M.J.; Huertas-Barbudo, B.; et al. Quality of life in patients with food allergy. Clin. Mol. Allergy 2016, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dunn Galvin, A.; Lloyd, M.; Hsiao, K.-C.; Tang, M.L. Long-term benefit of probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy on quality of life in a randomized trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 4493–4495.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. DunnGalvin, A.; Fleischer, D.M.; Campbell, D.E.; Hourihane, J.O.; Green, T.D.; Sampson, H.A.; Greenhawt, M. Improvements in Quality of Life in Children Following Epicutaneous Immunotherapy (EPIT) for Peanut Allergy in the PEPITES and PEOPLE Studies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 216–224.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Goldberg, M.R.; Levy, M.B.; Nachshon, L.; Elizur, A. Quality of Life of Food-Allergic Patients Before, During, and After Oral Immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 429–436.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Goldberg, M.R.; Levy, M.B.; Nachshon, L.; Elizur, A. Quality of life of children aged 8–12 years undergoing food allergy oral immunotherapy: Child and parent perspective. Allergy 2020, 75, 2623–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. van der Valk, J.P.; van Wijk, R.G.; Blok, B.M.J.F.-D.; van der Velde, J.L.; de Groot, H.; Wichers, H.J.; Dubois, A.E.J.; de Jong, N.W. No difference in health-related quality of life, after a food challenge with cashew nut in children participating in a clinical trial. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 27, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ward, C.; Greenhawt, M. Differences in Caregiver Food Allergy Quality of Life Between Tertiary Care, Specialty Clinic, and Caregiver-Reported Food Allergic Populations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2016, 4, 257–264.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fernandez-Rivas, M.; Vereda, A.; Vickery, B.P.; Sharma, V.; Nilsson, C.; Muraro, A.; Hourihane, J.O.; DunnGalvin, A.; Toit, G.; Blumchen, K.; et al. Open-label follow-on study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and quality of life with extended daily oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy. Allergy 2022, 77, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. DunnGalvin, A.; Dubois, A.E.J.; Blok, B.M.J.F.; Hourihane, J.O.B. The effects of food allergy on quality of life. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 2015, 101, 235–252. [Google Scholar]
  48. Protudjer, J.L.P.; Jansson, S.-A.; Middelveld, R.; Östblom, E.; Dahlén, S.-E.; Arnlind, M.H.; Bengtsson, U.; Kallström-Bengtsson, I.; Marklund, B.; Rentzos, G.; et al. Impaired health-related quality of life in adolescents with allergy to staple foods. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2016, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kansen, H.M.; Le, T.-M.; Meijer, Y.; Blok, B.M.J.F.-D.; Welsing, P.M.J.; van der Ent, C.K.; Knulst, A.C.; van Erp, F.C. The impact of oral food challenges for food allergy on quality of life: A systematic review. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the analyzed variables in the form of median (Q1–Q3) for quantitative variables and count (%) per level for qualitative variables for children, teens, adults, and all.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the analyzed variables in the form of median (Q1–Q3) for quantitative variables and count (%) per level for qualitative variables for children, teens, adults, and all.
VariableChildren (n = 46)Teens (n = 26)Adults (n = 34)* p-ValueAll (n = 106)
Male Sex33 (72%)21 (81%)15 (45%)<0.0169 (66%)
Missing Values001 1
Age (years)10 (9–11)15 (14–16)24 (20–33)na14 (10–18)
Missing Values **346 13
Presumed Tree Nut and/or Peanut Allergy
Walnut24 (53%)14 (54%)22 (67%)0.4560 (58%)
Pistachio34 (76%)22 (85%)11 (33%)<0.00167 (64%)
Cashew35 (78%)20 (77%)9 (27%)<0.00164 (62%)
Hazelnut23 (51%)13 (50%)14 (42%)0.7350 (48%)
Almond14 (31%)8 (31%)12 (36%)0.8634 (33%)
Peanut25 (56%)16 (62%)19 (58%)0.8960 (58%)
Missing Values101 2
Consuming Other Nuts 0.36
Never18 (39%)9 (35%)7 (21%) 34 (32%)
Yes, without Restrictions13 (28%)6 (23%)14 (41%) 33 (31%)
Sometimes, with Restrictions15 (33%)11 (42%)13 (38%) 39 (37%)
Missing Values000 0
Total No. of TNP with co-Allergy
(Cashew/Pistachio = 1)		3 (1–4)3 (1–4)2 (1–4)0.693 (1–4)
Missing Values101 2
Age of 1st TNP Reaction (years) <0.001
<29 (20%)8 (32%)2 (7%) 19 (19%)
2–525 (57%)10 (40%)4 (13%) 39 (39%)
6–125 (11%)4 (16%)9 (30%) 18 (18%)
13–18na0 (0%)11 (37%) 11 (11%)
>18nana0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Never Had a Reaction5 (11%)3 (12%)4 (13%) 12 (12%)
Missing Values201 3
TNP of the 1st Reaction 0.001
Walnut5 (13%)0 (0%)9 (33%) 14 (16%)
Pistachio6 (15%)9 (39%)1 (4%) 16 (18%)
Cashew9 (23%)3 (13%)3 (11%) 15 (17%)
Hazelnut11 (28%)2 (9%)3 (11%) 16 (18%)
Almond0 (0%)2 (9%)4 (15%) 6 (7%)
Peanut6 (15%)5 (22%)2 (7%) 13 (15%)
Other2 (5%)2 (9%)5 (19%) 9 (10%)
Missing Values636 15
TNP with Allergic Reactions
Walnut10 (26%)6 (25%)16 (55%)0.0232 (35%)
Pistachio15 (40%)16 (67%)8 (28%)0.0139 (43%)
Cashew17 (45%)13 (54%)6 (21%)0.0336 (40%)
Hazelnut10 (26%)7 (29%)10 (35%)0.7727 (30%)
Almond2 (5%)6 (25%)11 (38%)<0.0119 (21%)
Peanut7 (18%)13 (54%)13 (45%)<0.0133 (36%)
Missing Values825 15
Total No. of Reactions2 (1–3)1 (1–3)2 (1–3)0.792 (1–3)
Missing Values256 13
No. of Reactions Last Year0 (0–0)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)0.530 (0–1)
Missing Values15810 33
No. of Life-Threatening Reactions0 (0–1)0 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.820 (0–1)
Missing Values14913 36
Adrenaline Prescription35 (81%)19 (83%)13 (50%)<0.0167 (73%)
Missing Values338 14
Anaphylaxis Set Availability
(0: Never–6: Always)		5 (3–5)3 (2–5)5 (3–6)0.044 (3–5)
Missing Values337 13
Anaphylaxis Set Use Probability
(0: Never–6: Always)		5 (3–5)5 (4–6)4 (2–5)0.555 (3–5)
Missing Values337 13
Adrenaline Use
Ever6 (13%)10 (40%)7 (23%)0.0423 (23%)
Missing Values16710 33
No. of Reactions1 (0–1)1 (1–1)1 (1–2)0.201 (1–1)
Missing Values351727 79
No. of Reactions Last Year0 (0–0)0 (0–1)0 (0–0)0.110 (0–0)
Missing Values361826 80
Other Food Allergy20 (44%)16 (62%)20 (61%)0.2056 (53%)
Missing Values001 1
Allergic Rhinitis17 (39%)9 (38%)19 (61%)0.1045 (46%)
Missing Values002 2
Allergic Conjunctivitis6 (13%)5 (22%)6 (19%)0.6417 (17%)
Missing Values002 2
Atopic Dermatitis22 (48%)6 (26%)10 (32%)0.1638 (38%)
Missing Values012 3
Drug Allergy2 (5%)5 (23%)4 (13%)0.1111 (12%)
Missing Values100 1
Venom Allergy1 (3%)1 (5%)1 (3%)0.913 (4%)
Missing Values000 0
Allergic Asthma12 (26%)9 (36%)7 (20%)0.4128 (27%)
Missing Values000 0
* Differences across age groups were examined with Pearson’s chi-squared test of independence for qualitative variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for quantitative variables. ** In cases of missing values regarding participants’ age, questionnaires were distributed according to their age group. TNP—tree nut and/or peanut. na—non-applicable.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the available questionnaire averages in the form of median (Q1–Q3) for children, teens, adults, and all.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the available questionnaire averages in the form of median (Q1–Q3) for children, teens, adults, and all.
Children
(n = 46)		Teenagers
(n = 26)		Adults
(n = 34)		All
(n = 106)		* p-Value
FAQLQ Score4.6 (3.3–5.1)4.7 (3.9–5.5)3.9 (2.8–4.9)4.5 (3.2–5.1)0.08
Allergen Avoidance Score
and Dietary Restrictions Score		3.7 (3–5.1)
4.3 (2.9–5)		5.0 (3.8–5.8)4.2 (2.6–5.4)na
Risk of Accidental Exposure4.1 (2.8–5.2)4.4 (3.5–5.1)3.6 (2.3–5.1)na
Emotional Impact5.0 (4.0–6.2)4.6 (4.1–5.9)3.7 (3.2–5)na
Food Allergy Related Healthnana4.2 (2.8–5.3)na
FAIM Score3.7 (3.0–4.0)3.4 (2.8–4.0)3.2 (2.7–4.1)3.4 (2.8–4.0)0.44
FAQLQ—food allergy quality of life questionnaire. FAIM—food allergy independent measure. * Kruskal–Wallis test was performed to indicate differences across age groups. na—non-applicable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pasioti, M.; Savva, M.; Lakoumentas, J.; Kompoti, E.; Makris, M.; Xepapadaki, P.; Papadopoulos, N.G. Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103472

AMA Style

Pasioti M, Savva M, Lakoumentas J, Kompoti E, Makris M, Xepapadaki P, Papadopoulos NG. Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(10):3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pasioti, Maria, Maria Savva, John Lakoumentas, Evangelia Kompoti, Michael Makris, Paraskevi Xepapadaki, and Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos. 2023. "Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 10: 3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103472

APA Style

Pasioti, M., Savva, M., Lakoumentas, J., Kompoti, E., Makris, M., Xepapadaki, P., & Papadopoulos, N. G. (2023). Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(10), 3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop