Next Article in Journal
Combination of HLA-DQ2/-DQ8 Haplotypes and a Single MSH5 Gene Variant in a Polish Population of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes as a First Line Screening for Celiac Disease?
Next Article in Special Issue
The “Healthcare Workers’ Wellbeing [Benessere Operatori]” Project: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Psychological Responses of Italian Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Vaginal Dinoprostone (PGE2) in Patients with Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adverse Mental Health Sequelae of COVID-19 Pandemic in the Pregnant Population and Useful Implications for Clinical Practice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of the Cumulative Incidence of COVID-19 Cases on the Mental Health of the Spanish Out-of-Hospital Professionals

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082227
by Raúl Soto-Cámara 1,2,3, Susana Navalpotro-Pascual 3,4,5,*, José Julio Jiménez-Alegre 3,4,6, Noemí García-Santa-Basilia 2,3, Henar Onrubia-Baticón 2,3, José M. Navalpotro-Pascual 3,4, Israel John Thuissard 3,7, Juan José Fernández-Domínguez 3,4,7,8, María Paz Matellán-Hernández 2,3, Elena Pastor-Benito 3,4, Carlos Eduardo Polo-Portes 3,4,7, Rosa M. Cárdaba-García 2,3,9,* and on behalf of the IMPSYCOVID-19 Study Group
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082227
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 8 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health Challenges during the COVID-19 Pandemic)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear editors and authors,

The aim of this study was to assess levels of stress, anxiety and depression in health professionals of Spanish Emergency Medical Services and compare the finding to the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in the regions in which they worked. The authors have enrolled a high number of participants which is one of the strengths of their study.

Study methods seem appropriate, as well as ethic statements regarding them. Scales used in the study are validated and also appropriate to the study objectives.

Cited references are current and do not include an abnormal number of self-citations.

I find this manuscript interesting and informative. However, I have some comments and suggestions which could further improve the text.

  1. There are many abbreviations, some of which were not explained (SEM and PS).
  2. The introduction part should have a section on the mental health of the health professionals as this profession usually has high stress levels. This should also be addressed in the discussion.
  3. In the Results part of the manuscript, there is an overlap between data presented in text and tables which should be avoided.
  4. At the start of the Discussion part, the authors' wording suggest that they have proved causality, which was not possible with this study as they write in limitations of the study, too.
  5. The authors should compare their results with similar studies or with the Spanish general population.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall manuscript is looking good. Few suggestions: 

Line 26: Please explain what SEM stands for 

Line 40 Keywords: Efficacy is spelled wrong

Line 62: What PS ( ?Psychological stress) stands for 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop