Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Inclusion Criteria
2.3. Exlusion Criteria
2.4. Variables
2.5. Resources
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Haggard, P.; de Boer, L. Oral Somatosensory awareness. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 47, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Johnsen, S.E.; Trulsson, M. Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 89, 1478–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoshino, N.; Harada, F.; Alkhamrah, B.A.; Aita, M.; Kawano, Y.; Hanada, K.; Maeda, T. Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the development of periodontal Ruffini endings. Anat. Rec. Part A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 2003, 274, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Steenberghe, D.; Jacobs, R. Jaw motor inputs originating from osseointegrated oral implants. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacobs, R.; van Steenberghe, D. From osseoperception to implant-mediated sensory-motor interactions and related clinical implications. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trulsson, M. Sensory-motor function of human periodontal mechanoreceptors. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagata, K.; Itoh, S.; Tsuboi, A.; Takafuji, Y.; Tabata, T.; Watanabe, M. Response properties of periodontal mechanosensitive neurons in the trigeminal ganglion of rabbit and neuronal activities during grinding-like jaw movement induced by cortical stimulation. Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53, 1138–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, G.; Laine, C.M.; Tinastepe, N.; Özyurt, M.G.; Türker, K.S. Periodontal mechanoreceptors and bruxism at low bite forces. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 98, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Türker, K.S.; Yeo, P.L.M.; Gandevia, S.C. Perceptual distortion of face deletion by local anaesthesia of the human lips and teeth. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 165, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Türker, K.S.; Sowman, P.F.; Tuncer, M.; Tucker, K.J.; Brinkworth, R.S.A. The role of periodontal mechanoreceptors in mastication. Arch. Oral Biol. 2007, 52, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piancino, M.G.; Bracco, P.; Vallelonga, T.; Merlo, A.; Farina, D. Effect of bolus hardness on the chewing pattern and activation of masticatory muscles in subjects with normal dental occlusion. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2008, 18, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trulsson, M.; Essick, G.K. Sensations evoked by microestimulation of single mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the human face and mouth. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Svensson, K.G.; Trulsson, M. Impaired force control during food holding and biting in subjects with tooth- or implant-supported fixed prostheses. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2011, 38, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flanagan, D. Bite force and dental implant treatment: A short review. Med. Devices 2017, 10, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Piancino, M.G.; Isola, G.; Cannavale, R.; Cutroneo, G.; Vermiglio, G.; Bracco, P.; Anastasi, G.P. From Periodontal mechanoreceptors to chewing motor control: A systematic review. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 78, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poli, O.; Manzon, L.; Niglio, T.; Ettorre, E.; Vozza, I. Masticatory Force in Relation with Age in Subjects with Full Permanent Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare 2021, 9, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klineberg, I.; Murray, G. Osseoperception: Sensory function and propioception. Adv. Dent. Res. 1999, 13, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalaya, M.V. A study of oral stereognostic proficiency in dentulous and edentulous persons. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, ZE01–ZE06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mary, K.; Cherian, B. Evaluation of oral stereognosis, masticatory efficiency, and salivary flow rate in complete denture wearers. J. Indian Prosthodon. Soc. 2020, 20, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharjee, B.; Saneja, R.; Bhatnagar, A. Effect of complete dentures on oral stereognostic ability in edentulous patients: A systematic review. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2021, 21, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
- Linden, R.W.A.; Scott, B.J.J. Distribution of mesencephalic nucleus and trigeminal ganglion mechano receptors in the periodontal ligament of the cat. J. Physiol. 1989, 410, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weiner, S.; Sirois, D.; Ehrenberg, D.; Lehrmann, N.; Simon, B.; Zohn, H. Sensory responses from loading of implants: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004, 19, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Rowe, M.J.; Tracey, D.J.; Mahns, D.A.; Sahai, V.; Ivanusic, J.J. Mechanosensory perception: Are there contributions from bone-associated receptors? Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005, 32, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abarca, M.; Van Steenberghe, D.; Malevez, C.; Jacobs, R. The neurophysiology of osseointegrated oral implants. A clinically underestimated aspect. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, V.M.; Karani, J.T.; Khanna, A.; Badwaik, P.; Pai, A. Osseoperception: An Implant Mediated Sensory Motor Control- A Review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, S.K.; Chowdhary, R.; Chrcanovic, B.R.; Brånemark, P.I. Osseoperception in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. J. Prosthodont. 2016, 25, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clemente, F.; Håkansson, B.; Cipriani, C.; Wessberg, J.; Kulbacka-Ortiz, K.; Brånemark, R.; Fredén Jansson, K.J.; Ortiz-Catalan, M. Touch and Hearing Mediate Osseoperception. Sci. Rep. 2017, 28, 45363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, S.K.; Chowdhary, R. Evolution of dental implants through the work of per-ingvar branemark: A systematic review. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2020, 31, 930–956. [Google Scholar]
- Klineberg, I. Introduction: From osseointegration to osseoperception. The functional translation. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005, 32, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klineberg, I.; Calford, M.B.; Dreher, B.; Henry, P.; Macefield, V.; Miles, T.; Rowe, M.; Sessle, B.; Trulsson, M. A consensus statement on osseoperception. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005, 32, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, L.; Singh, B.P.; Rao, J.; Singh, K. Osseoperception in implants supported prostheses—A review. J. Med. Med. Sci. Res. 2012, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka, M.; Bruno, C.; Jacobs, R.; Torisu, T.; Murata, H. Short-term follow-up of masticatory adaptation after rehabilitation with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis: A pilot assessment. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2017, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Song, D.; Shujaat, S.; Constantinus, P.; Orhan, K.; Jacobs, R. Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: A systematic review. J. Oral Rehabil. 2021, 49, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- dos Santos Corpas, L.; Lambrichts, I.; Quirynen, M.; Collaert, B.; Politis, C.; Vrielinck, L.; Martens, W.; Struys, T.; Jacobs, R. Peri-implant bone innervation: Histological findings in humans. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014, 7, 283–292. [Google Scholar]
- Disbrow, E.A.; Hinkley, L.B.; Roberts, T.P. Ipsilateral representation of oral structures in human anterior parietal somatosensory cortex and integration of inputs across the midline. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 467, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henry, E.C.; Marasco, P.D.; Catania, K.C. Plasticity of the cortical dentition representation after tooth extraction in naked mole-rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 485, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ettlin, D.A.; Brügger, M.; Keller, T.; Luechinger, R.; Jäncke, L.; Palla, S.; Barlow, A.; Gallo, L.M.; Lutz, K. Interindividual differences in the perception of dental stimulation and related brain activity. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2009, 117, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avivi-Arber, L.; Lee, J.C.; Sessle, B.J. Effects of incisor extraction on jaw and tongue motor representations within face sensorimotor cortex of adult rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 2010, 518, 1030–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habre-Hallage, P.; Hermoye, L.; Gradkowski, W.; Jacobs, R.; Reychler, H.; Grandin, C.B. A manually controlled new device for punctuate mechanical stimulation of teeth during functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010, 37, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habre-Hallage, P.; Dricot, L.; Jacobs, R.; van Steenberghe, D.; Reychler, H.; Grandin, C.B. Brain plasticity and cortical correlates of osseoperception revealed by punctate mechanical stimulation of osseointegrated oral implants during fMRI. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2012, 5, 175–190. [Google Scholar]
- Habre-Hallage, P.; Dricot, L.; Hermoye, L.; Reychler, H.; van Steenberghe, D.; Jacobs, R.; Grandin, C.B. Cortical activation resulting from the stimulation of periodontal mechanoreceptors measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 18, 1949–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mericske-Stern, R.; Assal, P.; Mericske, E.; Bürgin, W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1995, 10, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mericske-Stern, R.; Zarb, G.A. In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 1996, 7, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moraes, N.; Moraes, E.; Anastacio, T.; Silva, L.; Machado, A.; Schoichet, J.; Alto, R.M.; Mello-Machado, R.; Cardarelli, A.; Mourão, C.F.A.B.; et al. Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case-Control Clinical Study. Materials 2021, 14, 4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Sheikh, A.M.; Hobkirk, J.A.; Howell, P.G.T.; Gilthorpe, M.S. Passive tactile sensibility in edentulous subjects treated with dental implants: A pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2004, 91, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieznis, L.; Apse, P.; Blumfelds, L. Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla. Stomatologija 2010, 12, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
- Reveredo, A.; Shetty, S.; Satish Babu, C.L.; Surendra Kumar, G.P.; Sneha Priya, K.; Pandurangappa, R.; Jnanadev, K.R.; Shetty, A. Evaluation of active tactile perception of single tooth implant prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Implantol. Clin. Res. 2013, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Enkling, N.; Nicolay, C.; Utz, K.H.; Johren, P.; Wahl, G.; Mericske-Stern, R. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2007, 18, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enkling, N.; Utz, K.H.; Bayer, S.; Stern, R.M. Osseoperception: Active tactile sensibility of osseointegrated dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2010, 25, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar]
- Enkling, N.; Nicolay, C.; Bayer SMericske-Stern, R.; Utz, K.H. Investigating interocclusal perception in tactile teeth sensibility using symmetric and asymmetric analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2010, 14, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Enkling, N.; Heussner, S.; Nicolay, C.; Bayer, S.; Mericske-Stern, R.; Utz, K.H. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth under local anesthesia of the natural antagonistic teeth. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazemi, M.; Geramipanah, F.; Negahdari, R.; Rakhshan, V. Active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants versus natural dentition: A split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2014, 16, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakshi, P.V.; Thakur, S.; Kulkami, S. Perception by Osseointegrated Dental Implants Supporting a Fixed Prosthesis: A Prospective Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2017, 32, 1346–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Batista, M.; Bonachela, W.; Soares, J. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implant. Res. 2008, 19, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Müller, F.; Hernandez, M.; Grütter, L.; Aracil-Kessler, L.; Weingart, D.; Schimmel, M. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses: A cross-sectional multicenter study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2012, 23, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shala, K.S.; Dula, L.J.; Pustina-Krasniqi TBicaj, T.; Ahmedi, E.F.; Lila-Krasniqui, Z.; Tmava-Dragusha, A. Evaluation of Sensibility Threshold for Interocclusal Thickness of Patients Wearing Complete Dentures. Int. J. Dent. 2017, 2017, 5138950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Negahdari, R.; Ghavimi, M.; Ghanizadeh, M.; Bohlouli, S. Active tactile sensibility of three-unit implant-supported FPDs versus natural dentition. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anastacio, T.H.; de Moraes, N.B.; de Moraes, E.J.; Quinelato, V.; Calasans-Maia, J.A.; Martins, C.C.; Aguiar, T.; Machado, A.N.; Casado, P.L. Analysis of Active Oral Tactile Sensitivity in Individuals with Complete Natural Dentition. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2021, 22, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Gil, D.; Dib-Zaitum, A.; Flores-Fraile, J.; López-Marcos, J. Importance of osseoperception and tactile sensibility during masticatory function in different prosthetic rehabilitations: A review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022, 58, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Gil, D.; Flores-Fraile, J.; López-Marcos, J. Tactile Sensibility Thresholds in Implant Prosthesis, Complete Dentures and Natural Dentition: Review about Their Value in Literature. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022, 58, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Group A | Group B | Group C | |
---|---|---|---|
Prosthetic situation | Complete denture wearers in both arches | Implant prosthesis wearers in both arches | Implant prosthesis wearers which antagonistic are natural teeth |
Number of patients included | 17 | 20 | 30 |
Group | A | B | C |
---|---|---|---|
Mean threshold value | 48.82 µm | 24.4 µm | 14.5 µm |
Standard deviation | 4.85 µm | 7.83 µm | 2.97 µm |
Group A | Men | Women | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | Media ± SD | Median (IR) | Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | p-Value | |
Age | 77.59 ± 10.98 | 79 (58–95) | 75.38 ± 12.33 | 75.50 (58–95) | 79.56 ± 9.94 | 79 (66–92) | 0.451 |
PWT | 2.24 ± 2.71 | 2 (0–10) | 2.25 ± 3.41 | 1 (0–10) | 2.22 ± 2,11 | 2 (0–7) | 0.541 |
Group B | Men | Women | |||||
Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | p-Value | |
Age | 59.20 ± 7.09 | 58 (45–72) | 59.80 ± 4.20 | 55 (53–70) | 57.40 ± 7.16 | 61 (45–72) | 0.527 |
PWT | 6.05 ± 4.58 | 5 (0–15) | 5.80 ± 4.2 | 5 (0–13) | 6.80 ± 6.10 | 5 (0–15) | 0.684 |
Group C | Men | Women | |||||
Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | Mean ± SD | Median (IR) | p-Value | |
Age | 56.87 ± 11.74 | 60.50 (35–79) | 55.22 ± 13.00 | 55 (53–70) | 59.41 ± 9.57 | 61 (45–72) | 0.34 |
PWT | 4.70 ± 4.46 | 3 (80–15) | 3.77 ± 3.84 | 5 (0–15) | 6.08 ± 5.10 | 5 (0–13) | 0.169 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
González-Gil, D.; Dib-Zaitun, I.; Flores-Fraile, J.; López-Marcos, J. Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226819
González-Gil D, Dib-Zaitun I, Flores-Fraile J, López-Marcos J. Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(22):6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226819
Chicago/Turabian StyleGonzález-Gil, Diego, Ibrahim Dib-Zaitun, Javier Flores-Fraile, and Joaquín López-Marcos. 2022. "Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 22: 6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226819