Next Article in Journal
Using 3D Microscope for Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplant
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiota: Not Just a Gut Feeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quality of Life in Women after Deep Endometriosis Surgery: Comparison with Spanish Standardized Values

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
2
Research Institute of Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPaz), C/ Pedro Rico 6, 28019 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, C/ Joaquín Rodrigo 1, Majadahonda, 28222 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Arzobispo Morcillo 2, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(20), 6192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206192
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)

Abstract

:
The quality of life (QoL) of women who have been surgically treated for endometriosis may be severely impaired. Therefore, QoL can be a determining factor in the recovery of these patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate if the QoL of women surgically treated for deep endometriosis differs from a healthy age-matched population from Catalonia (Spain) and to analyze the QoL of these women considering concomitant events. This is an observational cross-sectional study, where 112 women (between 18 and 48 years old), with endometriosis treated by surgery at Hospital Universitario La Paz (Madrid, Spain), were enrolled to assess the QoL using the second version of the 12-item short form (SF-12) questionnaire. The QoL in these women were tested against a reference population of healthy women using a standardized one-sample comparison method. In addition, the QoL was compared according to the pathophysiology and type of surgery. In women with endometriosis, the physical health component, but not mental health component, was positively correlated with age (r = 0.19; p-Value = 0.048). In addition, physical (20.3 ± 29.2) and social functions (29.7 ± 38.3) and the overall physical health component (37.8 ± 19.4) were significantly lower than the reference population. On the contrary, the body pain (64.1 ± 41.2), emotional role (62.5 ± 42.2), mental health (54.4 ± 26.0), vitality (59.3 ± 31.2), and the overall mental health component (59.4 ± 26.6) had significantly higher scores than the reference. The anatomical compartment of endometriosis, reintervention, bowel nodule resection, and fertility preservation did not show statistical differences in QoL. Women with deep endometriosis had worse physical and social functions, and the overall physical health, compared to the norm in Spanish women. Bodily pain, emotional role, vitality, and the overall mental health improved. These areas could be considered protective factors in this disease. Considering the importance of QoL in adjustments in mental and physical health, it would be necessary to improve these areas of QoL in women surgically treated for deep endometriosis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is one of the most frequent chronic and benign gynecological diseases that affects childbearing-age women [1]. In this disease, the tissue from the endometrium is implanted outside the uterus, causing adhesions, fibrosis, and lesions in organs, such as the intestine or bladder [2]. Deep endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue that infiltrates more than 5 mm beneath the peritoneum [3,4], affecting between 3–37% of premenopausal women with endometriosis [3,5,6,7]. Classic symptoms of endometriosis are pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea [2]. Menstrual disorders occur in 20–25% of the women with endometriosis, and sterility and infertility affect 30% of these women. In addition, anxiety or depression disorders occur in 60% of these patients [2].
Pharmacological or surgical treatments are available, but various factors have to be taken into account, such as the severity of the symptoms, age, degree and location of the lesions, previous response to medications, and the patient’s reproductive desire [8]. Pharmacological treatment is often the first choice, being frequently ineffective as deep endometriosis implants are made up of a large fibrous component [8,9]. Surgery is used in advanced cases, such as those that produce intestinal obstruction or ureteral stenosis, in progressive growth of the lesions, or in patients with little response to previous treatments [2]. In the short term, the quality of life in women with endometriosis treated surgically and pharmacologically improves [10]. However, in the long term, surgery is associated with severe postoperative events [11,12] that could diminish a woman’s quality of life. These events can influence women’s overall health by worsening their physical and mental components. To date, there are no studies that compare the QoL of these women after surgery with the standards in a healthy population.
Quality of life (QoL) is defined as the perception of each individual to assign value to the duration of life influenced by diseases, deficiencies, injuries, or treatments [13]. QoL is more and more relevant not only to determine the physical, social, and mental health of patients, but also to analyze the clinical procedures performed. Chronic and recurrent symptoms of endometriosis patients impair their ability to work, influencing family and social life [2,14]. Therefore, surgical treatment can be an option for women whose deep endometriosis symptoms reduce their QoL and are not controlled by medical treatment [15,16].
The QoL measurement focuses on assessing the degree of personal satisfaction in physical and social functions, physical and emotional roles, bodily pain, vitality, and mental and general health. Several scales have been designed, among the most used being the 36-item short form (SF-36) questionnaire or its reduced version SF-12, which is validated for the Spanish population [17,18].
The aim of this work was to study if there are differences in the QoL of women with deep endometriosis who were treated surgically with respect to an age-matched population established in Catalonia. Secondarily, this work explores whether the pathophysiological characteristics of deep endometriosis and the type of surgery determine differences in post-surgical QoL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Cohort Enrollment

This is an observational and cross-sectional study, which was conducted in women diagnosed with any deep endometriosis. This study was performed in the endometriosis unit of Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP, Madrid, Spain). A total of 160 women participating in follow-up at this unit from 2010 to 2017 were candidates for entry into the study.
A woman was phoned by a researcher (E.M.) to participate if she was between 18 and 50 years old, had been diagnosed with deep endometriosis using gynecologic exploration or transvaginal ultrasound, and underwent surgery with subsequent histological confirmation. By phone, the researcher read the patient information sheet and, if it was convenient, the women approved the informed consent. After this step, the women answered the SF-12 questionnaire regarding QoL (see below). The phone calls were performed from January to March 2018, and the interview lasted about 20 min., approximately.
The socio-demographic and medical data were available in the database of the HULP. If the medical records were not available, the observation was withdrawn from the study (n = 3). The medical records of the women who had not consented to participate were not included in this study (n = 1). Also, women who did not respond to calls on more than three occasions were dropped from recruitment (n = 44). The final cohort was 112 women (participation rate of 70.0%).
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of HULP on 26 January, 2018 (PI-3030).

2.2. Sociodemographic and Clinical Variables

From the medical records were recorded: age (years), time from the surgical intervention to SF-12 responses (years), gravida, parity (nulliparous, yes/no), previous miscarriages (yes/no), concomitant events (including anxiety, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, myofascial syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, autoimmune diseases, fibroid uterus, Crohn’s disease, and HIV), surgical reintervention (yes/no), surgical approach (considering laparoscopy versus laparotomy), bowel nodule resection (categorized as no, discoid, segmental, and shaving), cystectomy (categorized as no, uni-, or bi-lateral), ureterolysis (yes/no), and diagnoses of comorbidities. In addition, the intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded, and they were classified as infections (abscesses and peritonitis), rectovaginal fistulas, ureteral injuries, bladder atony, hemorrhages (wall hematoma and rectal bleeding), anastomosis dehiscence (sigma opening, vaginal vault dehiscence, leak anastomotic, and uterine perforation), and fever.

2.2.1. Type of Surgery

Deep endometriosis infiltrating nodes are removed during surgery per hospital protocol. The women were categorized according to preservation of (1) the uterus (regardless of ovarian involvement, hysterectomy), (2) both ovaries (regardless of whether they preserve the uterus, double adnexectomy), and (3) fertility, maintaining both uterus and ovaries (not including patients for whom any of these organs could be preserved).

2.2.2. Compartment Affectation

The degree of extension of the endometriosis was classified according to the involvement of the compartments as: anterior (bladder, vesico-uterine plica), posterior (uterosacral ligaments, uterine torus, rectovaginal septum, rectum, sigmoid), and lateral (ureters, sciatic nerve, parametria, iliac vessels, and round ligaments).

2.3. Quality of Life by Short-Form 12 (SF-12)

The SF-12 questionnaire is a reduced version of the SF-36 health questionnaire [18]. This study used the second version, developed in 2002 and adapted to the Spanish population [19]. Considering the time of the evaluation for this scale (four weeks), a single variation was applied since, in some cases, the SF-12 was carried out years after surgery. The time required to complete the SF-12 questionnaire was approximately 2 min. Research has verified that SF-12 is a valid and reliable measure, finding internal consistency estimates above 0.70 and significant correlations between the different versions of the scale [20,21].
The SF-12 questionnaire evaluates eight dimensions: (1) physical function (2 items evaluating the perceived physical effort), (2) physical role (2 items exploring the degree to which physical health interferes with work activities), (3) body pain (1 item, evaluating current physical pain), (4) social function (1 item exploring social difficulties), (5) emotional role (2 items evaluating the emotional adjustment for daily activities), (6) mental health (2 items exploring the degree of sadness and discouragement), (7) vitality (1 item exploring the degree of overall energy), and (8) general health (1 item, a personal assessment of health).
The SF-12 combines both dichotomous (0 = yes; 1 = no) and 3 or 5-pointsLikert responses. The scores were standardized using the following Equation (1). The highest score, the best state of health, makes it possible to represent a percentage of the values, where Xi is the score for women i, Min is a minimum score of the variable, and Max-Min is the range of the variable [22].
Standardized score = ((Xi-Min)/(Max − Min)) × 100
Additionally, two summative components can be obtained from these 8 dimensions: the overall physical and mental health components [23]. The components calculation used the standardized scores of the dimensions weighted by their factor loading of principal component analysis with orthogonal rotation (Equations (2) and (3)), following the recommendations of the original authors of the SF-36 [19]. This study did not use T-scores. In this study, the internal consistency of SF-12 by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83.
SPC = 0.407 × PF + 0.359 × FR + 0.332 × BP + 0.292 × GH + 0.040 × VT + 0.031 × SF − 0.242 × MH − 0.240 × ER
SMC = −0.219 × PF − 0.163 × FR − 0.133 × BP − 0.069 × GH + 0.232 × VT + 0.241 × SF + 0.536 × MH + 0.512 × ER
Being: summative physical component (SPC); summative mental component (SMC); physical function (PF); physical role (PR); body pain (BP); general health (GH); vitality (VT); social function (SF); mental health (MH); and emotional role (ER).
The scores of QoL according to the SF-12 were compared based on a specific method, which was the mean and standard deviation of the Catalonian population of healthy women according to age [17]. The means for women between 35 to 44 years old in the different dimensions of SF-12 is shown in Table 1.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD), and the qualitative variables were expressed as relative frequency (%) and sample size (n). The distribution of the variables was checked using Shapiro’s test. To achieve the objective of studying the differences in the QoL of women with deep endometriosis with respect to a reference value, a one-sample Student’s t-test was used considering the norms of the Catalan women population of a similar age [17]. The magnitude of the differences between the present study and the reference value provides information about the deviation in our cohort. It was calculated by the ratio between the standardized mean of present data and the references’ norm-based score, following previous effect calculation [24]. Small was considered <0.2, between 0.2 to 0.5 was considered moderate and, >0.5 was considered large. In addition, Pearson’s coefficient (r) was used to demonstrate correlations.
In addition, to explore if the pathophysiological characteristics and the type of surgery (hysterectomy, double adnexectomy, and fertility-preserving resection) could establish differences in the post-surgical QoL, an independent Student’s t-test was applied. In multi-categorical variables, a one-way ANOVA was carried out for the different dimensions of SF-12 and the clinical variables using Dunnett’s post-hoc test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All analyses have been performed using R software (version 4.1.1, R Core Team 2021, Vienna, Austria) within RStudio (Version 1.4.1717, RStudio, PBC, 2009–2021, Inc., Vienna, Austria) and using the rio, rcompanion, dplyr, ggplot2, corrplot, psych, and ggpubr packages.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Women aged 35.5 ± 6.0 (min = 20, max = 48) years all presented symptoms suggestive of endometriosis. Laparoscopy was used in 97.3% (109/112) of surgeries, with 2.7% (3/112) performed with laparotomy due to the difficult control of intraoperative bleeding. The mean of previous pregnancy was 0.6 ± 0.8 (min = 0, max = 3). In addition, 65.2% (70/112) of women were nulliparous, 34.8% (39/112) had a delivery, and 11.6% (13/112) had a miscarriage. The period between surgery and the SF-12 response had an average length of 3.1 ± 2.3 years.
Regarding surgical procedures, 46.4% (52/112) involved a hysterectomy, 8.9% (10/112) a unilateral adnexectomy, 30.4% (34/112) a bilateral adnexectomy, 4.5% (5/112) involved partial bladder resection, 4.5% (5/112) ureteral reimplantation, and 18.8% (21/112) included a partial colpectomy. As for women who presented bowel nodule (rectum, sigmoid, or recto-sigma), the segmental resection was the most frequent procedure (35.7%), followed by shaving (25.0%) and discoid resection (10.7%). Ileostomy was required in 9.8% of segmental intestinal resections. In addition, the rate of surgeries preserving the uterus and ovary was 52.7% (59/112). Additionally, ureterolysis was performed in 22.3% of patients, unilateral cystectomy in 17.9% of patients, and 17.0% of patients had a bilateral cystectomy.
In regard to intra- and postoperative complications, 73.2% (82/112) did not show complications. However, 5.4% (6/112) showed infections, another 5.4% (6/112) showed ureteral injuries, 4.5% (5/112) showed wall hematomas and rectal bleeding, bladder atony and rectovaginal fistulae were shown in 3.6% (4/112) of the cohort, and 2.7% (3/112) of the women showed anastomosis dehiscence, with 1.8% (2/112) of the women having a fever.

3.2. Quality of Life in Women with Deep Endometriosis Compared to a Reference Population

All dimensions of SF-12 were correlated, exceptionally physical and mental components, and physical components with emotional role and mental health dimensions (Table S1). In addition, the physical health component was significant and positively correlated with the age of the women (r = 0.19, p-Value = 0.048), while the mental health component had no significant correlation with age (r = −0.10, p-Value = 0.291). The physical (r = 0.12) and mental health components (r = 0.05) were not significantly correlated with the time between surgery and SF-12 response (p-value = 0.212 and p-value = 0.637, respectively; see Figure S1).
In our cohort, physical function (20.3 ± 29.2) and social function (29.7 ± 38.3) were significantly lower scoring dimensions compared to the reference population. In addition, the physical health component (37.8 ± 19.4) also scored significantly lower than the reference population (Table 2). However, the dimensions of body pain (64.1 ± 41.2), emotional role (62.5 ± 42.2), mental health (54.4 ± 26.0), and vitality (59.3 ± 31.2) had significantly higher scores than the reference population. Thus, the mental health component (59.4 ± 26.6) also scored significantly higher in women of the present sample compared to the reference (Table 2). The deviation was moderate in physical function, and the magnitude of the deviation in the rest of the dimensions and components was large.

3.3. Type of Surgery and Quality of Live in Women with Deep Endometriosis

None of the dimensions or components analyzed by SF-12 showed significant differences between women who preserved the uterus or were hysterectomized, in women with preservation of both ovaries compared to women with a double adnexectomy, and in those who kept the uterus and ovaries to preserve fertility compared to those who removed these organs (Table 3).

3.4. Secondary Clinical Outcome Related to Quality of Life in Women with Deep Endometriosis

The anatomical area according to the affected compartment was 8.9% (10/112) anterior, 87.5% (98/112) posterior, and 82.1% (92/112) lateral. Women with anterior compartment involvement scored significantly lower in social function (10.0 ± 21.1) compared to women without anterior compartment involvement (31.6 ± 39.2, p-value = 0.013). Women with posterior compartment involvement did not show statistical difference in any dimension or components nor with women without this affected compartment. Furthermore, women with lateral compartment involvement scored significantly lower in emotional role (59.2 ± 43.2) compared to women without lateral compartment involvement (77.5 ± 34.3, p-value = 0.048). The remaining dimensions and components showed no significant differences between the groups (Table 4).
No statistically significant differences were detected in any of the dimensions or components of the SF-12 between women with and without concomitant events, nor between women with and without reintervention (Supplementary Table S1).
The emotional role was significantly lower among women who underwent laparotomy intervention (50.0 ± 0.0) compared to those who underwent laparoscopy (62.8 ± 42.7, p-Value = 0.002). In addition, the vitality was significantly lower among women who underwent laparotomy intervention (33.3 ± 11.5) compared to those who underwent laparoscopy (60.0 ± 31.3, p-value = 0.038) (Supplementary Figure S1). The mental health component was lower in women intervened with laparotomy (45.5 ± 2.05) than those intervened with laparoscopy (59.8 ± 26.9, p-value < 0.001; Table 5).
No significant differences were detected in any of the dimensions or components of the SF-12 between women with bowel nodule resection (Table S2).

4. Discussion

Quality of life is a multi- and interdisciplinary fact. Additionally, QoL is subjective and depends on how a woman perceives their own life. The decrease in QoL has been associated with a deterioration of health and poor physical well-being [13,25,26]. In women with deep endometriosis, an adverse impact on physical, mental, and social well-being [27] has been reported, as well as a negative effect on QoL [28]. This study showed altered scores in physical and social functions, body pain, emotional role, and vitality. In addition, altered overall physical and mental components of QoL were detected compared to those in a reference cohort of healthy women. The magnitude effect was large in body pain, emotional role, and mental health. A systematic review concluded the annually needs for QoL assessment in women with endometriosis for a proper clinical follow-up [29]. For this reason, these results would be important in considering the expanded period of evaluating QoL since endometriosis surgery.
Over the years, there have been investigations of the QoL of women with deep endometriosis and how surgical and pharmacological interventions influence the areas of QoL. Abbot et al. showed an improvement in the physical and mental components 5 years after surgery, although without significantly differences in the baseline [30]. Vercellini’s pharmacological study could also not demonstrate significant longitudinally differences in these components [31]. Considering our data, which were reported an average of 3 years after surgery (physical = [34.2; 41.5], mental = [54.4; 64.4]); the Abbot study (physical = [38.2; 54.1], mental = [38.6; 55.4]) and Vercellini’s study (physical = [52.8; 55.8], mental = [47.2; 57.4]); it can be seen that our population scored lower in the physical health component, but higher in the mental health component. These differences could be attributed to the severity of symptoms between populations that obstruct the perception of physical health and coping processes that improve over time.
Additionally, we compared the QoL obtained by the SF-12 with the reference values based on the Catalonian population in 2012 [17]. This strategy was used since there are no standardized scores for women with endometriosis. In addition, we did have previous scores of these women before surgery. Both the standardization with the reference population and the time elapsed since surgery allow us to understand the process of QoL in women diagnosed with the disease during subsequent events following surgery. It is important to note was the rate of participation obtained is considered high, considering a similar study achieved a 40% rate of participation [32]. Additionally, although the scores of the reference population were obtained in 2012, it has been demonstrated that these scores were stable over a 10-year period in patients surgically treated for lumbar spine disease [33]. However, we did not check the long-term stability of the QoL profiles of the women in our cohort, which would be interesting research.
Endometriosis affects a high number of women of a reproductive age. Fertility preservation should be a clinical option in women that express their desire for pregnancy. However, endometriosis surgery does not increase the chance of a successful pregnancy [34]. According to our data, the women who was surgery intervened with fertility preservation, obtained better scores in body pain, emotional role, general health, and overall mental health. Even these results were not significant, and these data are positive due to the impact of QoL on women’s well-being and illness-related coping. Similar results were found by other authors [8,9].
In women with endometriosis, the impasse of ovarian preservation often arises. Factors such as age, desire for pregnancy, and symptoms must be considered. A women’s age plays an important role in the decision, since hormonal suppression in 48-year-old women (maximum age of this cohort) does not have the same impact on QoL and complications as in 20-year-old women (minimum age of this cohort). In general, it needs to be considered that the degree of the effect of health on QoL increases with age [35]. As is well known, early menopause increases the risk of mortality due to cardiovascular events, fractures, and colorectal cancer, and it is related to worse QoL [36]. According to our data, overall physical health was significant and positively correlated with age of the women. These data suggest that in women with deep endometriosis, the option of fertility-preserving surgery could be a good therapeutic alternative that even improves women’s QoL. However, this effect needs further research due to the overall mental health in terms of QoL did not show a correlation with the age of women. It is known that factors affecting the mental component of QoL are a higher educational level—particularly health literacy—self-efficacy, physical health-promoting behavior, perceived emotional support, and few associated comorbidities [37], which were non-controlled factors in this study.
In the past, several studies focused on fertility and the desire for pregnancy relative to ovarian preservation and not on uterine preservation [8,28]. In recent years, authors investigated the importance of uterine-sparing surgery to achieve a lasting improvement of QoL [38,39]. In our cohort, the analysis of QoL in different types of surgery represents a strength. Even without reaching statistical significance, it was observed that women surgically treated by hysterectomy got worse scores in body pain, emotional role, and mental and general health compared to women whose uterus was preserved. However, it appears that the conditioning variable for physical and mental health in hysterectomy would be repeat surgery [40]. Regarding women surgically treated with a double adnexectomy, we found worse body pain, vitality, and overall mental health, without being statistically significant. Considering these factors, it is important to perform endometriosis surgery at referral health care hospitals and to prefer ovarian cystectomies in young women. Furthermore, the improvement of QoL from preserving female reproductive organs should be a challenge for endometriosis surgery [41].
The different pelvic compartments’ involvement in endometriosis have been explored in relation to the areas of QoL. Other authors observed an improvement in all areas of QoL in women surgically treated for posterior compartment endometriosis [15,42,43]. This data is essential considering the disabling symptomatology when endometriosis involves the posterior compartment [44]. According to our data, mental health was close to being significantly improved in women affected in the posterior compartment. In addition, social function and emotional role were depressed in women with affected endometriosis in anterior (typically bladder involvement) and lateral compartments (typically uterine and in parametrium tissue, important for urination, defecation, and sexual function), respectively. This data could suggest that, after surgery, some nerves are damaged, and these women may face weeks of self-catheterization, vaginal dryness, and defecation disorders. However, it should be considered that, as with women in our cohort, women with posterior compartment involvement frequently also experience the involvement of the lateral compartment [45,46].
With respect to the surgery used to remove colorectal nodules, we did not find significant differences in QoL. In the literature, the association between the technique of nodule resection (shaving, discoid or segmental) and health and mental functions is not clear [42,43,47]. Interestingly, in a retrospective Wullschleger’s study performed on 211 women (Supplementary Table S2), although the technique of colorectal surgery was not mentioned, an increase in working performance was shown after endometriosis surgery [32]. This is important, as working performance has key consequences on the perception of emotional roles and mental, physical, and social functions [48]. A study of women with endometriosis treated by laparoscopic reported higher overall mental scores than their controls, near statistical significance [49]. According to our data, the laparoscopic surgical approach improves the emotional role, vitality, and overall mental health, although these data require further investigation.
In clinical practice with women who suffer deep endometriosis, routine evaluation of QoL should be considered essential both for the health-care provider and the women themselves. Nevertheless, the limitations of the present study need to be considered. Firstly, based on the retrospective design, we did not have the possibility of carrying out the SF-12 questionnaire before surgery. However, the strategy of standardization and comparison with a population of healthy women could solve this issue, considering also that differences in the physical and mental health components of SF-12 have not been demonstrated longitudinally [30,31]. Secondly, the impossibility of comparing the scores obtained in our cohort with the standard in populations of women with deep endometriosis must be noted for the SF-12.
In contrast, the time (around three years) between the surgery and the SF-12 responses can represent a strength of this study, because this period allowed the women to recover from surgery, to return to work and social life, to continue with hormonal treatment, or to become pregnant. All these factors are extremely important for the evaluation of women’s QoL.

5. Conclusions

This study sees that, compared to the norm in a Spanish population, women with deep endometriosis treated surgically had worse physical and social functions. Overall, the physical health component of the quality of life was depressed. However, as the woman’s age increases, the perception of improved physical health also increases. In these women, bodily pain, emotional role, mental health, and vitality were increased. Furthermore, the mental health component of quality of life also was increased. These areas could be considered protective factors in this disease prognosis, considering also that the type of surgery did not affect the patients’ quality of life. It would be necessary to attend to the quality of life of women with endometriosis as a key parameter to balance the appropriate treatment based on women’s needs

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11206192/s1, Table S1: Correlations between the dimensions of SF-12 in the cohort, Table S2: Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with or without bowel nodule resection, Figure S1: Scatter plots regarding women’s age and physical component (A), mental component (B) of SF-12,time between surgery and SF-12 response and the scores of the physical component (C), and the scores of the mental component (D).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H. and E.S.; methodology, E.M., E.S. and D.R.-C.; software, D.R.-C.; validation, A.H., E.M., D.R.-C. and E.S.; formal analysis, E.M. and D.R.-C.; investigation, A.L., A.S., C.R., P.S. and I.C.; resources, A.L., A.S., C.R., P.S. and I.C.; data curation, E.M. and D.R.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L., E.M., A.S., C.R., P.S. and I.C.; writing—review and editing, A.H., E.S. and D.R.-C.; visualization, A.H., E.M., E.S. and D.R.-C.; supervision, A.H., E.S. and D.R.-C.; funding acquisition, A.H. and E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Institute of Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPaz) through Luis Alvarez grant 2021 for emerging or associated clinical groups (FIBHULP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario La Paz (protocol code PI-3030 and approved on 26 January 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors. The availability of the data is restricted to investigators based in academic institutions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the women for their willingness to participate and respond to the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Donnez, O.; Roman, H. Choosing the Right Surgical Technique for Deep Endometriosis: Shaving, Disc Excision, or Bowel Resection? Fertil. Steril. 2017, 108, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Halis, G.; Mechsner, S.; Ebert, A.D. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2010, 107, 446–455; quiz 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mehedintu, C.; Plotogea, M.N.; Ionescu, S.; Antonovici, M. Endometriosis Still a Challenge. J. Med. Life 2014, 7, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Bazot, M.; Daraï, E. Diagnosis of Deep Endometriosis: Clinical Examination, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Other Techniques. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 108, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rousset, P.; Peyron, N.; Charlot, M.; Chateau, F.; Golfier, F.; Raudrant, D.; Cotte, E.; Isaac, S.; Réty, F.; Valette, P.-J. Bowel Endometriosis: Preoperative Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0-T MR Enterography—Initial Results. Radiology 2014, 273, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hernández, A.; Spagnolo, E.; Zapardiel, I.; Garcia-Abadillo Seivane, R.; López, A.; Salas Bolívar, P.; Pascual Miguelañez, I. Post-Operative Complications and Recurrence Rate after Treatment of Bowel Endometriosis: Comparison of Three Techniques. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. X 2019, 4, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burney, R.O.; Giudice, L.C. Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hidaka, T.; Nakashima, A.; Hashimoto, Y.; Saito, S. Effects of Laparoscopic Radical Surgery for Deep Endometriosis on Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 2012, 21, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dubernard, G.; Rouzier, R.; David-Montefiore, E.; Bazot, M.; Darai, E. Use of the SF-36 Questionnaire to Predict Quality-of-Life Improvement after Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Roman, H.; Vassilieff, M.; Gourcerol, G.; Savoye, G.; Leroi, A.M.; Marpeau, L.; Michot, F.; Tuech, J.-J. Surgical Management of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis of the Rectum: Pleading for a Symptom-Guided Approach. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de las Casas, S.G.; Spagnolo, E.; Saverio, S.d.; Álvarez-Gallego, M.; Carrasco, A.L.; López, M.C.; Cobos, S.T.; Campo, C.F.; Gutiérrez, A.H.; Miguelañez, I.P. Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis with Rectal Involvement: A Single-Center Experience of 168 Cases. Ann. Coloproctol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gortázar de Las Casas, S.; Pascual Miguelañez, I.; Spagnolo, E.; Álvarez-Gallego, M.; López Carrasco, A.; Carbonell López, M.; Hernández Gutiérrez, A. Quality of Life and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome before and after Deep Endometriosis Surgery. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furstenberg, A.-L. Trajectories of Aging: Imagined Pathways in Later Life. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 2002, 55, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de P. Sepulcri, R.; do Amaral, V.F. Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Women with Pelvic Endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 142, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Seracchioli, R.; Poggioli, G.; Pierangeli, F.; Manuzzi, L.; Gualerzi, B.; Savelli, L.; Remorgida, V.; Mabrouk, M.; Venturoli, S. Surgical Outcome and Long-Term Follow up after Laparoscopic Rectosigmoid Resection in Women with Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. BJOG 2007, 114, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Committee Opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 101, 927–935. [CrossRef]
  17. Schmidt, S.; Vilagut, G.; Garin, O.; Cunillera, O.; Tresserras, R.; Brugulat, P.; Mompart, A.; Medina, A.; Ferrer, M.; Alonso, J. Normas de Referencia Para El Cuestionario de Salud SF-12 Versión 2 Basadas En Población General de Cataluña. Med. Clin. 2012, 139, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alonso, J.; Prieto, L.; Antó, J.M. The Spanish Version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 Health Questionnaire): An Instrument for Measuring Clinical Results. Med. Clin. 1995, 104, 771–776. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vilagut, G.; Valderas, J.M.; Ferrer, M.; Garin, O.; López-García, E.; Alonso, J. Interpretation of SF-36 and SF-12 Questionnaires in Spain: Physical and Mental Components. Med. Clin. 2008, 130, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Okonkwo, O.C.; Roth, D.L.; Pulley, L.; Howard, G. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Validity of the SF-12 for Persons with and without a History of Stroke. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Andrews, G. A Brief Integer Scorer for the SF-12: Validity of the Brief Scorer in Australian Community and Clinic Settings. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2002, 26, 508–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ware, J.E.; Kosinski, M.; Keller, S.D. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scale, 2nd ed.; Ware, J.E., Ed.; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  23. Monteagudo Piqueras, O.; Hernando Arizaleta, L.; Palomar Rodríguez, J.A. Population Based Norms of the Spanish Version of the SF-12V2 for Murcia (Spain). Gac Sanit 2010, 25, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. de Graaff, A.A.; D’Hooghe, T.M.; Dunselman, G.A.J.; Dirksen, C.D.; Hummelshoj, L.; Simoens, S.; WERF EndoCost Consortium. The Significant Effect of Endometriosis on Physical, Mental and Social Wellbeing: Results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 2677–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Levy, B.R.; Slade, M.D.; Kasl, S.V. Longitudinal Benefit of Positive Self-Perceptions of Aging on Functional Health. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2002, 57, P409–P417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pinkas, J.; Gujski, M.; Humeniuk, E.; Raczkiewicz, D.; Bejga, P.; Owoc, A.; Bojar, I. State of Health and Quality of Life of Women at Advanced Age. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 3095–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Moradi, M.; Parker, M.; Sneddon, A.; Lopez, V.; Ellwood, D. Impact of Endometriosis on Women’s Lives: A Qualitative Study. BMC Womens Health 2014, 14, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Garry, R.; Clayton, R.; Hawe, J. The Effect of Endometriosis and Its Radical Laparoscopic Excision on Quality of Life Indicators. BJOG 2000, 107, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bourdel, N.; Chauvet, P.; Billone, V.; Douridas, G.; Fauconnier, A.; Gerbaud, L.; Canis, M. Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Patients with Endometriosis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0208464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abbott, J.A.; Hawe, J.; Clayton, R.D.; Garry, R. The Effects and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Excision of Endometriosis: A Prospective Study with 2–5 Year Follow-Up. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1922–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vercellini, P.; Bracco, B.; Mosconi, P.; Roberto, A.; Alberico, D.; Dhouha, D.; Somigliana, E. Norethindrone Acetate or Dienogest for the Treatment of Symptomatic Endometriosis: A before and after Study. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 734–743.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wullschleger, M.F.; Imboden, S.; Wanner, J.; Mueller, M.D. Minimally Invasive Surgery When Treating Endometriosis Has a Positive Effect on Health and on Quality of Work Life of Affected Women. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Joelson, A.; Sigmundsson, F.G.; Karlsson, J. Stability of SF-36 Profiles between 2007 and 2016: A Study of 27,302 Patients Surgically Treated for Lumbar Spine Diseases. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2022, 20, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferrell, K.; Rohlfs, A.; Hansen, K.; von Wald, T. Endometriosis and Infertility. S D Med. 2020, 73, 350–355. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rondón García, L.M.; Ramírez Navarrro, J.M. The Impact of Quality of Life on the Health of Older People from a Multidimensional Perspective. J. Aging Res. 2018, 2018, 4086294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Coccia, M.E.; Rizzello, F.; Mariani, G.; Bulletti, C.; Palagiano, A.; Scarselli, G. Ovarian Surgery for Bilateral Endometriomas Influences Age at Menopause. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 3000–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lee, M.K.; Oh, J. Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults: Its Association with Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Health-Promoting Behavior. Healthcare 2020, 8, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sandström, A.; Bixo, M.; Johansson, M.; Bäckström, T.; Turkmen, S. Effect of Hysterectomy on Pain in Women with Endometriosis: A Population-Based Registry Study. BJOG 2020, 127, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rindos, N.B.; Fulcher, I.R.; Donnellan, N.M. Pain and Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Excision of Endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020, 27, 1610–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zupi, E.; Centini, G.; Lazzeri, L.; Finco, A.; Exacoustos, C.; Afors, K.; Zullo, F.; Petraglia, F. Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection Versus Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol 2015, 22, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roman, H. Endometriosis Surgery and Preservation of Fertility, What Surgeons Should Know. J. Visc. Surg. 2018, 155 (Suppl. S1), S31–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riiskjær, M.; Forman, A.; Kesmodel, U.S.; Andersen, L.M.; Ljungmann, K.; Seyer-Hansen, M. Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life before and after Laparoscopic Bowel Resection for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis: A Prospective, Observational Study. Dis. Colon Rectum 2018, 61, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mabrouk, M.; Montanari, G.; Guerrini, M.; Villa, G.; Solfrini, S.; Vicenzi, C.; Mignemi, G.; Zannoni, L.; Frasca, C.; di Donato, N.; et al. Does Laparoscopic Management of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Improve Quality of Life? A Prospective Study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2011, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Seracchioli, R.; Mabrouk, M.; Guerrini, M.; Manuzzi, L.; Savelli, L.; Frascà, C.; Venturoli, S. Dyschezia and Posterior Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Analysis of 360 Cases. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2008, 15, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Raimondo, D.; Mabrouk, M.; Zannoni, L.; Arena, A.; Zanello, M.; Benfenati, A.; Moro, E.; Paradisi, R.; Seracchioli, R. Severe Ureteral Endometriosis: Frequency and Risk Factors. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 38, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Meuleman, C.; Tomassetti, C.; D’Hoore, A.; van Cleynenbreugel, B.; Penninckx, F.; Vergote, I.; D’Hooghe, T. Surgical Treatment of Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis with Colorectal Involvement. Hum. Reprod. Update 2011, 17, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sima, R.-M.; Pleş, L.; Socea, B.; Sklavounos, P.; Negoi, I.; Stănescu, A.-D.; Iordache, I.-I.; Hamoud, B.H.; Radosa, M.P.; Juhasz-Boess, I.; et al. Evaluation of the SF-36 Questionnaire for Assessment of the Quality of Life of Endometriosis Patients Undergoing Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tavakoli-Fard, N.; Mortazavi, S.-A.; Kuhpayehzadeh, J.; Nojomi, M. Quality of Life, Work Ability and Other Important Indicators of Women’s Occupational Health. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2016, 29, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Soto, E.; Luu, T.H.; Liu, X.; Magrina, J.F.; Wasson, M.N.; Einarsson, J.I.; Cohen, S.L.; Falcone, T. Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 996–1002.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Catalonian population norms of the SF-12 dimensions for women aged 44–53 years in 2012.
Table 1. Catalonian population norms of the SF-12 dimensions for women aged 44–53 years in 2012.
Mean (SD)CI [95%] Mean (SD)CI [95%]
Physical function51.7 (8.3)[50.8; 52.5]Emotional role50.2 (9.1)[49.3; 51.1]
Physical role50.9 (9.0)[50.0; 51.8]Mental health49.5 (9.4)[48.5; 50.4]
Body pain50.7 (9.6)[49.7; 51.7]Vitality49.6 (9.9)[48.5; 50.6]
Social function50.9 (8.7)[50.0; 51.8]General health50.8 (9.1)[49.9; 51.8]
Physical component51.6 (8.1)[50.7; 52.4]Mental component49.3 (9.5)[48.3; 50.3]
Data shown: mean, standard deviation (SD), and 95% of confidence interval [CI]. Data extracted from [17].
Table 2. Differences in dimensions and components of SF-12 of women with deep endometriosis treated by surgery with respect to a norm of Catalan women.
Table 2. Differences in dimensions and components of SF-12 of women with deep endometriosis treated by surgery with respect to a norm of Catalan women.
ReferenceMean (SD)CI [95%]Magnitudep-Value
Physical function51.7 (8.3)20.3 (29.2)[14.9; 25.8]0.4<0.001
Physical role50.9 (9.0)54.5 (45.3)[46.0; 62.9]1.10.407
Body pain50.7 (9.6)64.1 (41.2)[56.3; 71.8]1.30.001
Social function50.9 (8.7)29.7 (38.3)[22.5; 36.9]0.6<0.001
Emotional role50.2 (9.1)62.5 (42.2)[54.6; 70.4]1.20.003
Mental health49.5 (9.4)59.4 (26.0)[54.5; 64.3]1.2<0.001
Vitality49.6 (9.9)59.3 (31.2)[53.4; 65.1]1.10.001
General health50.8 (9.1)50.8 (34.0)[44.4; 57.1]1.00.989
Physical component51.6 (8.1)37.8 (19.4)[34.2; 41.5]0.7<0.001
Mental component49.3 (9.5)59.4 (26.6)[54.4; 64.4]1.2<0.001
Data shown: mean, standard deviation (SD), and 95% of confidence interval [CI]. The p-value was extracted with one-sample Student’s t-test considering the reference column from [17]. The magnitude column was calculated as the ratio between the score of the present study and the reference value.
Table 3. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with or without hysterectomy, double adnexectomy, and fertility-preserving node resection.
Table 3. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with or without hysterectomy, double adnexectomy, and fertility-preserving node resection.
HysterectomyDouble AdnexectomyFertility-Preserving Resection
No (n = 60)Yes (n = 52)p-ValueNo (n = 72)Yes (n = 40)p-ValueNo (n = 57)Yes (n = 55)p-Value
Physical function18.3 (28.3)22.6 (30.2)0.44517.7 (26.7)25.0 (33.0)0.23623.7 (30.8)16.8 (27.2)0.213
Physical role55.0 (44.8)53.8 (46.3)0.89454.9 (45.3)53.8 (45.8)0.90253.5 (46.2)55.5 (44.8)0.821
Body pain67.1 (40.0)60.6 (42.7)0.40967.0 (38.6)58.8 (45.5)0.33559.6 (43.2)68.6 (39.2)0.250
Social function30.0 (37.6)29.3 (39.5)0.92728.5 (36.4)31.9 (42.0)0.66830.3 (39.2)29.1 (37.8)0.872
Emotional role64.2 (40.2)60.6 (44.7)0.65863.2 (41.1)61.2 (44.6)0.82159.6 (22.8)65.5 (39.5)0.468
Mental health61.1 (24.1)57.5 (28.2)0.46960.3 (23.1)57.8 (30.9)0.64956.3 (29.0)62.6 (22.4)0.201
Vitality59.3 (30.1)59.2 (32.7)0.98660.3 (29.7)57.5 (33.9)0.66660.0 (33.6)58.5 (28.8)0.806
General health53.5 (32.4)47.6 (35.9)0.36651.4 (33.1)49.6 (36.1)0.79948.2 (36.0)53.4 (32.0)0.428
Physical component38.2 (20.4)37.4 (18.4)0.81837.7 (19.1)38.1 (20.1)0.92138.1 (19.2)37.5 (19.8)0.865
Mental component61.0 (26.1)57.6 (27.4)0.49960.3 (23.9)57.9 (31.3)0.67656.8 (29.0)62.1 (23.9)0.287
Data shown: mean and standard deviation (SD). The p-value was extracted by independent Student’s t test.
Table 4. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with affected compartment of deep endometriosis.
Table 4. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with affected compartment of deep endometriosis.
AnteriorPosteriorLateral
No (n = 102)Yes (n = 10)p-ValueNo (n = 14)Yes (n = 98)p-ValueNo (n = 20)Yes (n = 92)p-Value
Physical function20.6 (29.1)17.5 (31.3)0.77032.1 (35.9)18.6 (27.9)0.19620.0 (34.0)20.4 (28.2)0.963
Physical role53.9 (45.4)60.0 (45.9)0.69739.3 (44.6)56.6 (45.2)0.19262.5 (45.5)52.7 (45.3)0.391
Body pain63.0 (41.3)75.0 (40.8)0.39450.0 (49.0)66.1 (39.9)0.25973.8 (41.7)62.0 (41.0)0.260
Social function31.6 (39.2)10.0 (21.1)0.01341.1 (41.1)28.1 (37.9)0.28025.0 (40.6)30.7 (38.0)0.569
Emotional role61.8 (42.3)70.0 (42.2)0.56860.7 (40.1)62.8 (42.7)0.86277.5 (34.3)59.2 (43.2)0.048
Mental health59.8 (26.0)55.6 (27.2)0.64648.4 (24.5)61.0 (26.0)0.09265.0 (25.8)58.2 (26.1)0.296
Vitality60.2 (31.1)50.0 (31.6)0.35150.0 (37.4)52.9 (33.1)0.32659.0 (30.8)59.3 (31.4)0.964
General health51.3 (33.9)45.0 (36.5)0.61036.1 (37.9)52.9 (33.1)0.13653.8 (34.9)50.1 (34.0)0.674
Physical component37.7 (19.5)38.8 (19.5)0.87531.3 (24.9)38.8 (18.5)0.29839.6 (17.3)37.4 (19.9)0.633
Mental component60.0 (26.6)52.9 (28.2)0.46156.0 (29.6)59.9 (26.3)0.64266.1 (22.3)57.9 (27.4)0.163
Data shown: mean and standard deviation (SD). The p-value was extracted with an independent Student’s t-test.
Table 5. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with concomitant events, reintervention, and surgical approach.
Table 5. Dimensions and components of SF-12 among women with concomitant events, reintervention, and surgical approach.
Concomitant EventsReinterventionSurgical Approach
No (n = 83)Yes (n = 28)p-ValueNo (n = 53)Yes (n = 58)p-ValueLPS (n = 109)LPT (n = 3)p-Value
Physical function21.1 (30.6)18.8 (25.1)0.69017.5 (26.7)23.3 (31.4)0.29320.4 (29.3)16.7 (28.9)0.844
Physical role56.0 (45.8)48.2 (44.1)0.42655.7 (43.5)52.6 (47.2)0.72255.0 (45.1)33.3 (57.7)0.583
Body pain65.1 (41.9)59.8 (39.9)0.55666.5 (37.3)61.2 (44.7)0.49864.7 (41.0)41.7 (52.0)0.525
Social function26.8 (37.4)39.3 (40.5)0.15826.5 (36.3)32.8 (40.3)0.42129.6 (38.1)33.3 (57.7)0.921
Emotional role63.3 (42.8)58.9 (40.9)0.63563.2 (40.6)61.2 (44.0)0.80462.8 (42.7)50.0 (0.0)0.002
Mental health58.8 (26.8)59.9 (23.3)0.82959.5 (23.5)58.6 (28.1)0.85259.9 (25.8)40.7 (33.9)0.431
Vitality60.5 (31.5)55.0 (30.6)0.42062.3 (28.7)56.2 (33.4)0.30760.0 (31.3)33.3 (11.5)0.038
General health52.5 (33.5)43.8 (34.7)0.24950.7 (32.9)50.0 (35.0)0.91950.9 (34.2)45.0 (34.6)0.797
Physical component38.5 (19.3)32.4 (19.3)0.09737.7 (18.3)37.7 (20.6)0.99038.1 (19.4)26.2 (18.2)0.374
Mental component58.4 (27.9)61.6 (22.8)0.54460.0 (24.4)58.4 (28.7)0.76259.8 (26.9)45.5 (2.04)<0.001
Data shown: mean and standard deviation (SD). The p-value was extracted with an independent Student’s t-test. Laparoscopy (LPS), Laparotomy (LPT).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández, A.; Muñoz, E.; Ramiro-Cortijo, D.; Spagnolo, E.; Lopez, A.; Sanz, A.; Redondo, C.; Salas, P.; Cristobal, I. Quality of Life in Women after Deep Endometriosis Surgery: Comparison with Spanish Standardized Values. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206192

AMA Style

Hernández A, Muñoz E, Ramiro-Cortijo D, Spagnolo E, Lopez A, Sanz A, Redondo C, Salas P, Cristobal I. Quality of Life in Women after Deep Endometriosis Surgery: Comparison with Spanish Standardized Values. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(20):6192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández, Alicia, Elena Muñoz, David Ramiro-Cortijo, Emanuela Spagnolo, Ana Lopez, Angela Sanz, Cristina Redondo, Patricia Salas, and Ignacio Cristobal. 2022. "Quality of Life in Women after Deep Endometriosis Surgery: Comparison with Spanish Standardized Values" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 20: 6192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop