Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Surgical Procedure
2.2. Clinical and Radiological Evaluation
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Results
3.2. Radiological Results
3.3. Scapular Notching
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alentorn-Geli, E.; Samitier, G.; Torrens, C.; Wright, T.W. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Part 2: Systematic Review of Reoperations, Revisions, Problems, and Complications. Int. J. Shoulder Surg. 2015, 9, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werner, C.M.L.; Steinmann, P.A.; Gilbart, M.; Gerber, C. Treatment of Painful Pseudoparesis Due to Irreparable Rotator Cuff Dysfunction with the Delta III Reverse-Ball-and-Socket Total Shoulder Prosthesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2005, 87, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedman, R.J.; Barcel, D.A.; Eichinger, J.K. Scapular Notching in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2019, 27, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lädermann, A.; Gueorguiev, B.; Charbonnier, C.; Stimec, B.V.; Fasel, J.H.D.; Zderic, I.; Hagen, J.; Walch, G. Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction. Medicine 2015, 94, e1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyffeler, R.W.; Werner, C.M.L.; Simmen, B.R.; Gerber, C. Analysis of a Retrieved Delta III Total Shoulder Prosthesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2004, 86, 1187–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sirveaux, F.; Favard, L.; Oudet, D.; Huquet, D.; Walch, G.; Molé, D. Grammont Inverted Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis with Massive Rupture of the Cuff. Results of a Multicentre Study of 80 Shoulders. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2004, 86, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wall, B.; Nové-Josserand, L.; O’Connor, D.P.; Edwards, T.B.; Walch, G. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review of Results According to Etiology. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2007, 89, 1476–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lévigne, C.; Boileau, P.; Favard, L.; Garaud, P.; Molé, D.; Sirveaux, F.; Walch, G. Scapular Notching in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2008, 17, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simovitch, R.; Flurin, P.-H.; Wright, T.W.; Zuckerman, J.D.; Roche, C. Impact of Scapular Notching on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Midterm Outcomes: 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2019, 28, 2301–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mollon, B.; Mahure, S.A.; Roche, C.P.; Zuckerman, J.D. Impact of Scapular Notching on Clinical Outcomes after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 476 Shoulders. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2017, 26, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simovitch, R.W.; Zumstein, M.A.; Lohri, E.; Helmy, N.; Gerber, C. Predictors of Scapular Notching in Patients Managed with the Delta III Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2007, 89, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spiry, C.; Berhouet, J.; Agout, C.; Bacle, G.; Favard, L. Long-Term Impact of Scapular Notching after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 1559–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloch, H.R.; Budassi, P.; Bischof, A.; Agneskirchner, J.; Domenghini, C.; Frattini, M.; Borroni, M.; Zoni, S.; Castagna, A. Influence of Glenosphere Design and Material on Clinical Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Shoulder Elb. 2014, 6, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franceschetti, E.; Ranieri, R.; Giovanetti de Sanctis, E.; Palumbo, A.; Franceschi, F. Clinical Results of Bony Increased-Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) Associated with an Onlay 145° Curved Stem in Patients with Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Comparative Study. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2020, 29, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Athwal, G.S.; MacDermid, J.C.; Reddy, K.M.; Marsh, J.P.; Faber, K.J.; Drosdowech, D. Does Bony Increased-Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Decrease Scapular Notching? J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2015, 24, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boileau, P.; Morin-Salvo, N.; Bessière, C.; Chelli, M.; Gauci, M.-O.; Lemmex, D.B. Bony Increased-Offset-Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: 5 to 10 Years’ Follow-Up. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2020, 29, 2111–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erickson, B.J.; Frank, R.M.; Harris, J.D.; Mall, N.; Romeo, A.A. The Influence of Humeral Head Inclination in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2015, 24, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohut, G.; Dallmann, F.; Irlenbusch, U. Wear-Induced Loss of Mass in Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with Conventional and Inverted Bearing Materials. J. Biomech. 2012, 45, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irlenbusch, U.; Kääb, M.J.; Kohut, G.; Proust, J.; Reuther, F.; Joudet, T. Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty with Inversed Bearing Materials: 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results in 101 Patients. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2015, 135, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constant, C.R.; Murley, A.H. A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1987, 214, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbart, M.K.; Gerber, C. Comparison of the Subjective Shoulder Value and the Constant Score. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2007, 16, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, R.R.; An, K.N.; Bigliani, L.U.; Friedman, R.J.; Gartsman, G.M.; Gristina, A.G.; Iannotti, J.P.; Mow, V.C.; Sidles, J.A.; Zuckerman, J.D. A Standardized Method for the Assessment of Shoulder Function. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 1994, 3, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castagna, A.; Randelli, M.; Garofalo, R.; Maradei, L.; Giardella, A.; Borroni, M. Mid-Term Results of a Metal-Backed Glenoid Component in Total Shoulder Replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2010, 92, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melis, B.; DeFranco, M.; Lädermann, A.; Molé, D.; Favard, L.; Nérot, C.; Maynou, C.; Walch, G. An Evaluation of the Radiological Changes around the Grammont Reverse Geometry Shoulder Arthroplasty after Eight to 12 Years. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2011, 93, 1240–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boileau, P.; Watkinson, D.; Hatzidakis, A.M.; Hovorka, I. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis: Results in Cuff Tear Arthritis, Fracture Sequelae, and Revision Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2006, 15, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyffeler, R.W.; Werner, C.M.L.; Gerber, C. Biomechanical Relevance of Glenoid Component Positioning in the Reverse Delta III Total Shoulder Prosthesis. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2005, 14, 524–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohut, G.; Reuther, F.; Joudet, T.; Kääb, M.J.; Irlenbusch, U. Inverted-Bearing Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Scapular Notching Does Not Affect Clinical Outcomes and Complications at up to 7 Years of Follow-Up. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2022, 31, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazaleyrat, M.; Favard, L.; Boileau, P.; Berhouet, J. Humeral Osteolysis after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Cemented or Cementless Stems Comparative Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 9 Years. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2021, 107, 102916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ernstbrunner, L.; Suter, A.; Catanzaro, S.; Rahm, S.; Gerber, C. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Before the Age of 60 Years: Long-Term Results. JBJS 2017, 99, 1721–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, C.W.; Barrett, M.; Erickson, J.; Chatindiara, I.; Poon, P. Larger Polyethylene Glenospheres in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Are They Safe? JSES Int. 2020, 4, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, J.; Malak, S.F.; Anderson, I.A.; Astley, T.; Poon, P.C. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Designs of Glenospheres in the SMR Reverse Total Shoulder Prosthesis: Range of Motion and Risk of Scapular Notching. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2009, 18, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langohr, G.D.G.; Willing, R.; Medley, J.B.; Athwal, G.S.; Johnson, J.A. Contact Mechanics of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty during Abduction: The Effect of Neck-Shaft Angle, Humeral Cup Depth, and Glenosphere Diameter. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2016, 25, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roche, C.; Flurin, P.-H.; Wright, T.; Crosby, L.A.; Mauldin, M.; Zuckerman, J.D. An Evaluation of the Relationships between Reverse Shoulder Design Parameters and Range of Motion, Impingement, and Stability. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2009, 18, 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mollon, B.; Mahure, S.A.; Roche, C.P.; Zuckerman, J.D. Impact of Glenosphere Size on Clinical Outcomes after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 297 Shoulders. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2016, 25, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Müller, A.M.; Born, M.; Jung, C.; Flury, M.; Kolling, C.; Schwyzer, H.-K.; Audigé, L. Glenosphere Size in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is Larger Better for External Rotation and Abduction Strength? J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2018, 27, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neyton, L.; Erickson, J.; Ascione, F.; Bugelli, G.; Lunini, E.; Walch, G. Grammont Award 2018: Scapular Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (Grammont Style): Prevalence, Functional, and Radiographic Results with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2019, 28, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Outcome | Preop | Postop | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
CS | 23 ± 13 | 67 ± 17 | <0.001 |
ASES | 37 ± 21 | 81 ± 18 | <0.001 |
SSV | 27 ± 24 | 77 ± 16 | <0.001 |
Pain | 7.3 ± 2.4 | 1.0 ± 1.8 | <0.001 |
AE | 66° ± 37° | 140° ± 32° | <0.001 |
ER | 15° ± 14° | 26° ± 17° | 0.042 |
IR | 3.9 ± 2.1 | 5.4 ± 2.9 | <0.001 |
Outcome | 40 mm (38) | 44 mm (10) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
CS | 63 ± 17 | 78 ± 11 | 0.006 |
ASES | 79 ± 19 | 87 ± 15 | 0.206 |
SSV | 75 ± 17 | 84 ± 12 | 0.141 |
AE | 133 ± 33° | 157 ± 19° | 0.051 |
ER | 23 ± 17° | 36 ± 17° | 0.036 |
IR | 4.8 ± 2.7 | 7.8 ± 2.2 | 0.011 |
Outcome | No Notching (35) | Notching (13) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
CS | 70 ± 15 | 58 ± 20 | 0.046 |
ASES | 86 ± 14 | 70 ± 22 | 0.031 |
SSV | 81 ± 14 | 68 ± 20 | 0.027 |
Pain | 0.9 ± 1.9 | 1.2 ± 1.6 | 0.058 |
AE | 148° ± 23° | 115° ± 37° | 0.006 |
ER | 28° ± 15° | 20° ± 21° | 0.142 |
IR | 5.7 ± 2.5 | 5.1 ± 3.6 | 0.561 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Castagna, A.; Borroni, M.; Dubini, L.; Gumina, S.; Delle Rose, G.; Ranieri, R. Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5796. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195796
Castagna A, Borroni M, Dubini L, Gumina S, Delle Rose G, Ranieri R. Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(19):5796. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195796
Chicago/Turabian StyleCastagna, Alessandro, Mario Borroni, Luigi Dubini, Stefano Gumina, Giacomo Delle Rose, and Riccardo Ranieri. 2022. "Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 19: 5796. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195796