Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Outcomes after Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes of Stenting in Patients with Isolated Distal Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis or Post-Surgical Restenosis
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of the Catheter-Based Transapical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Mitral Paravalvular Leak
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between Selected Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (IMT) Value in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Co-Existing with Early Microvascular Complications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 17
10.3390/jcm11175000
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Shows Improved Outcomes in Patients with an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a High Thrombus Burden Treated with Adjuvant Aspiration Thrombectomy

by
Wojciech Zajdel
1,
Tomasz Miszalski-Jamka
2,
Jarosław Zalewski
3,4,
Jacek Legutko
1,5,
Krzysztof Żmudka
1,5 and
Elżbieta Paszek
1,6,*
1
Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, The John Paul II Hospital, Pradnicka 80, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Radiology and Imaging Diagnostics, The John Paul II Hospital, Pradnicka 80, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
4
Clinical Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, The John Paul II Hospital, Pradnicka 80, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
5
Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
6
Department of Thromboembolic Disorders, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5000; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175000
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 6 August 2022 / Accepted: 19 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis—Part II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is a discrepancy between epicardial vessel patency and microcirculation perfusion in a third of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Optimization with aspiration thrombectomy (AT) may reduce distal embolization and microvascular obstruction. The effect of AT in the treatment of STEMI is debatable. The purpose of this study was to use cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to determine whether AT influences microvascular obstruction (MVO), infarct size and left ventricular (LV) remodelling in STEMI patients. Sixty STEMI patients with a thrombus-occluded coronary artery were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive PCI proceeded by AT (AT + PCI group), or PCI only. MVO, myocardial infarct size and LV remodelling were assessed by CMR during the index hospitalization and 6 months thereafter. The majority of patients had a large thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus grade 5 in over 70% of patients). PCI and AT were effective in all cases. There were no periprocedural strokes. CMR showed that the addition of AT to standard PCI was associated with lesser MVO when indexed to the infarct size and larger infarct size reduction. There were less patients with left ventricle remodelling in the AT + PCI vs. the PCI only group. To conclude, in STEMI patients with a high thrombus burden, AT added to PCI is effective in reducing infarct size, MVO and LV remodelling.

1. Introduction

The ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) annual incidence rate is estimated at three million cases worldwide [1,2]. Despite dynamic developments in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction, the morbidity and mortality rates in survivors remain high [3]. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is fundamental in the treatment strategy of STEMI patients [4]. Restoration of the infarct-related artery (IRA) patency, at least theoretically, enables coronary microcirculation salvage and prevents myocardial necrosis. However, modern imaging methods have revealed a discrepancy between epicardial vessel patency and microcirculation perfusion in at least one third of STEMI patients treated with PCI [5,6].
Coronary microvascular obstruction (MVO), which is associated with the no-reflow phenomenon, is partly caused by distal embolization [7,8]. A recent study showed that enhanced thrombin generation in patients with STEMI is associated with the extent of necrosis as assessed by CMR [9]. It is debatable to what extent MVO impacts myocardial necrosis and left ventricle (LV) remodelling [10,11]. Therefore, the concept of aspiration thrombectomy (AT) as a mechanical adjuvant intervention during PCI for thrombus removal, possibly resulting in a reduced distal embolization, is worth investigating.
In recent years, novel advanced imaging techniques of the coronary arteries and myocardial tissue, including highly sophisticated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) modalities, became available. This allowed for a precise assessment of the impact of thrombus burden reduction on infarct size, scarring and LV remodelling [12,13]. Although echocardiography is a faster, cheaper and easily accessible method of left ventricle function assessment, CMR is a significantly more precise and sensitive tool, enabling the assessment of parameters such as MVO or scar retraction which are unavailable in echocardiography [14].
Therefore, in the present study we aimed to evaluate whether the use of AT as an adjuvant therapy to standard PCI in STEMI patients is associated with MVO, infarct size and left ventricular (LV) remodelling in STEMI patients using CMR perfusion assessment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

We included 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI, who had a total occlusion of the infarct related artery (TIMI Flow 0–1) with a thrombus visible on the coronary angiogram and who were referred for PCI. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a symptom onset > 12 h prior to admission, left bundle branch block, haemodynamic instability (including cardiogenic shock, pulmonary oedema, NYHA III or IV class symptoms), a prior STEMI in the same location, any contraindication for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) administration, extreme tortuosity of the IRA, a reference diameter < 2.5 mm proximal to IRA occlusion, and any contraindication for CMR.

2.2. Study Protocol

The study protocol was summarized in Figure 1.
Directly after coronary angiography, patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups:
Group I—the AT plus PCI group (AT + PCI group) where thrombus aspiration was performed, followed by routine PCI with stent implantation
Group II—where PCI was performed, without AT (PCI only group).
All patients received identical standard premedication treatment periprocedurally and during the follow-up period, in adherence to the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines [4]. All patients had received a loading dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 300 mg p.o.) and clopidogrel (600 mg p.o.) before the procedure. Newer P2Y12 antagonists were unavailable at the time the study was performed. Intravenous, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered in all patients with a target activated clotting time (ACT) of 200–350 s. In selected cases, at the operator’s discretion, intravenous Abciximab was added in a body weight adjusted dose.
In the AT + PCI group, AT was performed using the mechanical Rescue System™ (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA) with an active lumen diameter of 0.042 inches. Aspiration was performed from the end of the guiding catheter to the site of the occlusion and distally, with at least two passages or to maximum elimination of the visible thrombus. If an attempt to perform AT across the lesion was unsuccessful, a predilation with a small balloon (≤2.0 mm) was performed and aspiration was attempted again. In all cases, following the opening of the IRA, the procedure was optimized by a stent implantation with a high-pressure technique. Post procedural distal embolization and TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade (TMPG) were assessed. Angiographic analysis was performed post hoc using Acom PC (Siemens, Munich, Germany) by two independent, experienced operators.
The primary endpoints were: the extent of MVO, MI size and the occurrence of LVEDV enlargement (∆LVEDV, defined as an increase in LVEDV of 12% or more) assessed by CMR [15]. Demographic and biochemical variables, and atherosclerosis risk factors such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and 12-lead standard ECG were recorded in all patients.

2.3. CKMB Release

Blood levels of creatinine kinase MB isoform (CKMB) were evaluated on admission, 24 and 48 h after reperfusion. The sum of CKMB released was calculated as the area under the release curve (AUC, U × h) in order to estimate infarct size, as part of an established method [16,17].

2.4. Resolution of ST-Segment Elevation on 12-Lead ECG

Standard electrocardiograms (25 mm per second recording speed and 1 mV per centimetre voltage) were recorded for all patients on admission, directly post-procedurally, one and two hours after reperfusion. The sum of ST segment elevation in the J point was measured by two independent, experienced cardiologists in accordance with the method previously described [18].

2.5. CMR Acquisition

The primary and secondary endpoints were evaluated using CMR (1,5T Magnetom Sonata Maestro Class, Siemens, Munich, Germany). CMR was performed twice: between day 3 and 5 of the index hospitalization (CMRindex) and 6 months post PCI (CMRfollow-up). CMRindex encompassed cine, morphologic and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, whereas CMRfollow-up only encompassed cine and LGE imaging. Cine imaging was performed in apical left ventricular long and short-axis views encompassing the entire LV myocardium with balanced steady-state–free precession gradient echo (slice/gap thickness 8/0 mm, matrix = 256 × 192, in-plane resolution = 1.4 × 1.4 mm2, TR = 3.0 ms, TE = 1.3 or 1.2 ms, flip angle = 59 or 700). Morphologic images were acquired in short axis views with T2-weighted triple inversion recovery (TIRM) (slice/gap thickness = 8/0 mm, matrix = 256 × 192, in-plane resolution = 1.4 mm × 1.4 mm, TR depending upon RR interval, TE = 65 ms, flip angle = 1800) and T1-weighted turbo spin echo imaging (slice/gap thickness = 8/0 mm, matrix = 256 × 192, in-plane resolution = 1.4 mm × 1.4 mm, TR depending upon RR interval, TE = 6.9 ms, flip angle = 1800). Ten minutes after intravenous infusion of 0.1 mmol/kg body-weight gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) LGE imaging was performed in apical LV long axis and short-axis views with T1-weighted, segmented, inversion-recovery pulse sequence (slice thickness = 8 mm, gap thickness = 0 mm, matrix = 256 × 192, in-plane resolution = 1.4 × 1.4 mm2, TR = 650 or 700 ms, TE = 4.9 or 3.3 ms, flip angle = 30, TI to null normal myocardium).

2.6. CMR Analysis

The analysis was performed off-line using dedicated software (MASS Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands) by an independent reader (TMJ) blinded to clinical and angiographic data. As previously described, endocardial and epicardial LV borders were outlined on short-axis cine images to calculate ejection fraction (LVEF) as well as end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and myocardial mass (LVmass) which was indexed to body surface area (LVMass index). The cut-off value for the occurrence of adverse LV remodelling six months after STEMI was defined as an enlargement of LVEDV of at least 12% [15]. TIRM images were quantitatively evaluated for the presence and location of hyperintense myocardial areas when compared to normal appearing myocardium. The cut-off value to delineate the hyperintense areas defined as areas at risk (AAR) was two standard deviations above the mean signal intensity of normal appearing myocardium. The volume of AAR was calculated and indexed to LV myocardial volume (AARindex). Based on quantitative evaluation, LGE images were assessed for the presence and location of hyperintense lesions in contrast to normal appearing myocardium (MI size). The cut-off value to delineate LGE lesion was 5 standard deviations above the mean signal intensity of normal appearing myocardium. The hypointense areas within LGE were defined as microvascular obstruction (MVO) lesions and were included in the area of LGE lesions. The size of MI was calculated as the volume of LGE and indexed to LV myocardial volume (MIindex). Similarly, the volume of MVO was quantified and expressed as the percentage of the volume of LGE lesion (MVOindex). To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment, myocardial salvage index at CMRindex as an indicator of treatment effectiveness was assessed using the following formula:
Myocardial Salvage Index (MSI) = (AAR vol − MI vol)/(AAR vol)

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data of the cohorts. The distribution of data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Due to the lack of normal distribution, the results were shown as median [interquartile range, IQR]. Comparative statistics used the non-parametric U Mann–Whitney test for numerical variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. An essential level of significance was assumed at p = 0.05. Statistics were calculated using JASP 0.11.13.

3. Results

3.1. Patients Characteristics

A total of 60 patients, predominantly men, were included into the study that comprised the AT + PCI Group (n = 40) and the PCI alone Group (n = 20). The median age was 55 [16.5] years in the AT + PCI group and 57 [20.0] years in the PCI only group, p = 1.0. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of atherosclerosis risk factors or comorbidities (Table 1).
Additionally, both groups were homogenous with regard to baseline clinical and haemodynamic parameters, total ischemia time and angiographical parameters (Table 2).

3.2. Angiography and PCI

The majority of patients presented with a high thrombus burden (TIMI Thrombus Grade 5 in 82.9% in the AT + PCI group, and 76.5% in the PCI only group, p = 0.40, Table 2). PCI was effective in all cases and thrombotic material was obtained in all AT + PCI patients. In a visual assessment, AT led to a significant thrombus reduction in all cases. The final, postprocedural TMPG and angiographically assessed distal embolization rates were similar between the groups (Table 2).
The addition of AT to PCI enabled more frequent direct stenting in the AT + PCI group vs. the PCI only group (42.9% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.014, Table 2). Importantly, AT-assisted PCI was safe; there were no serious periprocedural complications, including stroke.

3.3. Enzymatic and ECG Assessment

There were no significant differences in the infarct size measured as AUC of CK-MB (10,787 U/L for the AT + PCI group vs. 6337 U/L for the PCI only group; p = 0.09; Table 3). The ST-segment resolution on ECG between the two groups was also similar in both timepoints (Table 3).

3.4. CMR Assessment

Of the 60 patients who were initially included, an optimal quality CMR was obtained in 52 patients (Figure 1). During the six-month follow-up period, two patients died, and one patient underwent an urgent surgery, precluding a repeated CMR assessment. Of the 49 follow-up CMRs performed, four could not be evaluated due to insufficient quality, leaving a final number of 45 patients with an index and follow-up CMR (28 in the AT + PCI group and 17 in the PCI only group).
The MVO/MI index was significantly lower in the AT + PCI group in comparison with the PCI only group (11.7 [IQR 9%] vs. 22.2 [IQR 26.9%], p = 0.009; Table 3). We observed that MI size reduction after 6 months was slightly larger in the AT + PCI group compared with that of the PCI only group (−7.8 [IQR 10.8] g vs. −4.5 [IQR 4.8] g; p = 0.03, Table 3). Moreover, patients treated with AT had a significantly lower increase in LVEDV during follow-up than patients who did not (median, 8.7 [IQR 19.3] mL vs. 20.0 [IQR 20.5] mL, p = 0.004, Table 3). Consistently, six months post index procedure, significantly fewer patients in the AT + PCI group exhibited adverse LV remodelling (∆LVEDV > 12%: 8.6% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.019; Table 3). Example CMR images of a patient with AT + PCI and PCI only are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively.

4. Discussion

The most important findings from the present study are that the addition of AT to standard primary PCI in STEMI patients with a high thrombus burden results in a significantly smaller degree of MVO, a larger reduction of MI size and less LV remodelling at six months following PCI for STEMI, as assessed by CMR.
This is particularly important, as our cohort represents a group of relatively young patients with a median age of 55 (16.5) years in the AT + PCI group and 57 (20.0) years in the PCI only group, with a high prevalence of anterior STEMI, in whom both the quality of life, and life expectancy due to the risk of adverse cardiovascular events should be particularly addressed. Reports indicate that in young STEMI patients, severe thrombus formation is more frequent when compared with older patients, and the left anterior descending artery is the predominant IRA that requires more complex management [19]. In a study by Zasada et al., thrombus formation in the IRA was diagnosed more frequently in patients below 40 years old [19]. In line with this, AT was performed twice as often in patients younger than 40 years old, as compared with older patients (15.5% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001).
In addition, in the present study most patients presented with a high thrombus burden (more than 70% of patients with TIMI Thrombus Grade 5, Table 2), which is known to carry an increased risk of distal embolization by fragmented thrombus debris [20]. This results in an increase of infarct size, which is dependent on MVO [21]. Of note, thrombotic debris constitutes a biologically active material that may exacerbate local injury via inflammatory reactions [22]. Unfortunately, although many cardioprotective strategies against myocardial injury have been proposed, none has shown a clinically significant improvement in STEMI patients [21]. Some promise may be associated with an intracoronary oxygen therapy [23], or modulation of the microRNAs expression [24]. An association between expression levels of miR-1–3p and thrombotic plaques, as a potential prognostic factor for future cardiovascular events has been reported [25].
In the light of the above, it seems reasonable that removing even a portion of the obstructive material in the setting of a high thrombus burden should improve flow in the IRA and muscle viability. In fact, mechanical thrombectomy is gaining significance in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, a disease with a similar pathophysiology to myocardial infarction, as it is caused by a thrombus occlusion of intracerebral arteries [26]. However, current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of AT in the treatment of STEMI [4]. This is partially due to findings from older studies, using CK-MB release and ST-segment resolution to assess the infarct size and adverse LV remodelling in relation to AT [17,27]. In the present study we also found a similar ST segment resolution and CKMB release in both study groups, which is consistent with previous findings. It must be emphasized that these parameters are suitable only for an estimation of infarct size, and are unable to distinguish between subtle differences on tissue level [17,27]. On the contrary, advanced CMR protocols have enabled a precise assessment of coronary microvasculature and the interstitium by utilizing contrast medium diffusion during the first pass, together with the microvascular perfusion resistance index [28]. Furthermore, CMR has proven its utility in detecting inflammation in the myocardial tissue [29].
Very few studies have evaluated the effects of AT on CMR parameters in STEMI patients and these have brought conflicting results [30,31,32]. Our CMR analysis shows that AT + PCI significantly reduced MVO, infarct size and prevented adverse LV remodelling. This finding is consistent with some previous reports [30,33]. LV remodelling after STEMI is an important indicator of the risk of heart failure and its consequences, including malignant arrythmias and cardiac death [34,35]. Still, the majority of reports on the subject showed no effect of routine AT on hard clinical endpoints [4]. Possibly, the subtle differences observed in the CMR may not immediately translate into adverse clinical outcomes, such as mortality, however LV remodelling and MVO contribute to the risk of heart failure development [10].
Interestingly, we found that infarct size was significantly lower when using AT. Similarly, a CMR substudy of 75 patients from the EXPIRA trial showed that AT reduced MI size three months post index procedure, and this translated to a lower mortality nine months post the initial STEMI hospitalization [36]. Also, in a CMR study by Zia et al. involving 60 STEMI patients, AT during primary PCI was associated with reduced myocardial oedema, myocardial haemorrhage, left ventricular remodelling and incidence of MVO [33].
Some safety concerns considering AT arose after the TOTAL trial which showed a slight increase in the incidence of ischemic stroke, following AT-assisted primary PCI in STEMI (0.3% vs. 0.1% in the first 48 h post index procedure) [37]. The fact that none of the AT-treated patients in our cohort experienced a stroke deserves a comment. It needs to be emphasized that AT is a multistep, complicated procedure, which may result in peripheral embolization. It is, however, a reliable tool in the hands of an experienced operator, provided that all safety measures are kept, most importantly a deep intubation of the coronary artery and maintaining a negative pressure throughout the whole procedure, up to a complete removal of the device.
Study limitations. This was a relatively small study, however with regard to group characteristics, ours is a representative of a typical STEMI population. Despite the small sample size, to our knowledge, this is the most complete evaluation of the effect of AT on CMR outcomes in PCI-treated STEMI patients. A follow-up CMR assessment was possible in 45 out of the initial 60 patients. Other authors report similar difficulties, with a 75% effective CMR follow-up [38,39]. Therefore, our conclusions must be treated with caution. They are primarily meant to emphasize that there still is need for further research into the role of AT in STEMI, especially in the influence it may have on more subtle endpoints rather than major adverse clinical events. Moreover, an additional assessment of a broader range of inflammatory and necrotic biomarkers could shed new light on the role of AT in the treatment of STEMI patients with a high thrombus burden.

5. Conclusions

We found that in relatively young STEMI patients presenting with a large thrombus burden, AT adjuvant to primary PCI was associated with a reduction in microvascular obstruction and a decrease in MI size. Aspiration thrombectomy added to PCI significantly reduced the LVEDV increase, leading to an overall lower incidence of LV remodelling in comparison with patients treated with basic PCI. Taken together, our current findings suggest that adjunctive AT may benefit STEMI patients who are at high risk of distal embolization due to a large thrombus burden.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z., J.Z. and K.Ż.; methodology, W.Z. and T.M.-J.; software, T.M.-J. and E.P.; validation, J.L., J.Z. and K.Ż.; formal analysis, W.Z. and E.P.; investigation, W.Z. and J.Z.; resources, W.Z., T.M.-J.; data curation, J.L., K.Ż.; writing—original draft preparation, E.P.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, T.M.-J., E.P.; supervision, K.Ż., J.L.; project administration, W.Z.; funding acquisition, W.Z., K.Ż. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Science Fund of the John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland no. FN 06/2022 to EP and by a grant from the Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland to K.Ż.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (KBET 120/B/2007).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. White, H.D.; Chew, D.P. Acute Myocardial Infarction. Lancet 2008, 372, 570–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Namazi, M.H.; Mazloomi, S.S.; Kalate Aghamohammadi, M. Correlation Between TIMI Risk Score and the Number of Vessels Involved in the Angiographic Study; a Cross-Sectional Study. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2022, 10, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jankowski, P.; Topór-Mądry, R.; Gąsior, M.; Cegłowska, U.; Gierlotka, M.; Kubica, J.; Kalarus, Z.; Lesiak, M.; Wojakowski, W.; Legutko, J.; et al. Management and Predictors of Clinical Events in 75,686 Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Kardiol. Pol. 2022, 80, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ibanez, B.; James, S.; Agewall, S.; Antunes, M.J.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C.; Bueno, H.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Crea, F.; Goudevenos, J.A.; Halvorsen, S.; et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation: The Task Force for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2017, 39, 119–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ndrepepa, G.; Tiroch, K.; Fusaro, M.; Keta, D.; Seyfarth, M.; Byrne, R.A.; Pache, J.; Alger, P.; Mehilli, J.; Schömig, A.; et al. 5-Year Prognostic Value of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2383–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krawczyk, K.; Stepien, K.; Nowak, K.; Nessler, J.; Zalewski, J. ST-Segment Re-Elevation Following Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Patent Infarct-Related Artery: Impact on Left Ventricular Function Recovery and Remodeling. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej 2019, 15, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Waha, S.; Patel, M.R.; Granger, C.B.; Ohman, E.M.; Maehara, A.; Eitel, I.; Ben-Yehuda, O.; Jenkins, P.; Thiele, H.; Stone, G.W. Relationship between Microvascular Obstruction and Adverse Events Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis from Seven Randomized Trials. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 3502–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McAlindon, E.; Pufulete, M.; Harris, J.; Lawton, C.; Johnson, T.; Strange, J.; Baumbach, A.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C. Microvascular Dysfunction Determines Infarct Characteristics in Patients with Reperfused ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MICROcirculation in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MICRO-AMI) Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sia, C.-H.; Tan, S.-H.; Chan, S.-P.; Marchesseau, S.; Sim, H.-W.; Carvalho, L.; Chen, R.; Amin, N.H.M.; Fong, A.Y.-Y.; Richards, A.M.; et al. Enhanced Thrombin Generation Is Associated with Worse Left Ventricular Scarring after ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cohort Study. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niccoli, G.; Scalone, G.; Lerman, A.; Crea, F. Coronary Microvascular Obstruction in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhang, L.; Mandry, D.; Chen, B.; Huttin, O.; Hossu, G.; Wang, H.; Beaumont, M.; Girerd, N.; Felblinger, J.; Odille, F. Impact of Microvascular Obstruction on Left Ventricular Local Remodeling after Reperfused Myocardial Infarction. J. Magn. Reason. Imaging 2018, 47, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reindl, M.; Eitel, I.; Reinstadler, S.J. Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Improve Risk Prediction Following Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lichota, E.; Stępień, K.; Nowak, K.; Nowak, G.; Karcińska, A.; Matrejek, A.; Platschek, M.; del Yika, A.C.; Furczyńska, P.; Nessler, J.; et al. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Myocardial Infarction Patient. One More Argument for a Wider Use of Now Reimbursed Optical Coherence Tomography. Kardiol. Pol. 2022, 80, 616–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gardner, B.I.; Bingham, S.E.; Allen, M.R.; Blatter, D.D.; Anderson, J.L. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Cardiac Volumes and Regional Function after Myocardial Infarction: An Intrasubject Comparison Using Simultaneous Intrasubject Recordings. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 2009, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bulluck, H.; Go, Y.Y.; Crimi, G.; Ludman, A.J.; Rosmini, S.; Abdel-Gadir, A.; Bhuva, A.N.; Treibel, T.A.; Fontana, M.; Pica, S.; et al. Defining Left Ventricular Remodeling Following Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2017, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dissmann, R.; Linderer, T.; Schröder, R. Estimation of Enzymatic Infarct Size: Direct Comparison of the Marker Enzymes Creatine Kinase and Alpha-Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase. Am. Heart J. 1998, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fagel, N.D.; Amoroso, G.; Vink, M.A.; Slagboom, T.; van der Schaaf, R.J.; Herrman, J.-P.; Patterson, M.S.; Oosterwerff, E.F.J.; Vos, N.S.; Verheugt, F.W.A.; et al. An Immediate or Early Invasive Strategy in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The OPTIMA-2 Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. Heart J. 2021, 234, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dizon, J.M.; Brener, S.J.; Maehara, A.; Witzenbichler, B.; Biviano, A.; Godlewski, J.; Parise, H.; Dambrink, J.-H.; Mehran, R.; Gibson, C.M.; et al. Relationship between ST-Segment Resolution and Anterior Infarct Size after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis from the INFUSE-AMI Trial. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2014, 3, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zasada, W.; Bobrowska, B.; Plens, K.; Dziewierz, A.; Siudak, Z.; Surdacki, A.; Dudek, D.; Bartuś, S. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Young Patients. Kardiol. Pol. 2021, 79, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Srikanth, S.; Ambrose, J.A. Pathophysiology of Coronary Thrombus Formation and Adverse Consequences of Thrombus During PCI. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2012, 8, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bellis, A.; Di Gioia, G.; Mauro, C.; Mancusi, C.; Barbato, E.; Izzo, R.; Trimarco, B.; Morisco, C. Reducing Cardiac Injury during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Reasoned Approach to a Multitarget Therapeutic Strategy. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sagris, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Oikonomou, E.; Paschaliori, C.; Galiatsatos, N.; Tsioufis, K.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammation in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. David, S.W.; Khan, Z.A.; Patel, N.C.; Metzger, D.C.; Wood, F.O.; Wasserman, H.S.; Lotfi, A.S.; Hanson, I.D.; Dixon, S.R.; LaLonde, T.A.; et al. Evaluation of Intracoronary Hyperoxemic Oxygen Therapy in Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction: The IC-HOT Study. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019, 93, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Scărlătescu, A.I.; Micheu, M.M.; Popa-Fotea, N.-M.; Dorobanțu, M. MicroRNAs in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A New Tool for Diagnosis and Prognosis: Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Badacz, R.; Przewłocki, T.; Gacoń, J.; Stępień, E.; Enguita, F.J.; Karch, I.; Żmudka, K.; Kabłak-Ziembicka, A. Circulating MiRNA Levels Differ with Respect to Carotid Plaque Characteristics and Symptom Occurrence in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis and Provide Information on Future Cardiovascular Events. Postepy Kardiol. Interwencyjnej 2018, 14, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Musialek, P.; Nizankowski, R.; Hopkins, L.N.; Micari, A.; Alvarez, C.A.; Nikas, D.N.; Ruzsa, Z.; Kühn, A.L.; Petrov, I.; Politi, M.; et al. Interdisciplinary Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke—Current Evidence on Training Requirements for Endovascular Stroke Treatment. Position Paper from the ESC Council on Stroke and the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions with the Support of the European Board of Neurointervention: A Step Forward. Adv. Interv. Cardiol. 2021, 17, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dohi, T.; Maehara, A.; Brener, S.J.; Généreux, P.; Gershlick, A.H.; Mehran, R.; Gibson, C.M.; Mintz, G.S.; Stone, G.W. Utility of Peak Creatine Kinase-MB Measurements in Predicting Myocardial Infarct Size, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, and Outcome after First Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the INFUSE-AMI Trial). Am. J. Cardiol. 2015, 115, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kramer, C.M.; Barkhausen, J.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C.; Flamm, S.D.; Kim, R.J.; Nagel, E. Standardized Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) Protocols: 2020 Update. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2020, 22, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tymińska, A.; Ozierański, K.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Marcolongo, R.; Marchel, M.; Kapłon-Cieślicka, A.; Baritussio, A.; Filipiak, K.J.; Opolski, G.; Grabowski, M. Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy in 2021: An Update. Pol Arch. Intern. Med. 2021, 131, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meier, D.; Fournier, S.; Masci, P.G.; Eeckhout, E.; Antiochos, P.; Tzimas, G.; Stoyanov, N.; Muenkaew, M.; Monney, P.; Schwitter, J.; et al. Impact of Manual Thrombectomy on Microvascular Obstruction in STEMI Patients. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 97, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. An, Y.; Kaji, S.; Kim, K.; Yamamuro, A.; Kinoshita, M.; Ehara, N.; Kobori, A.; Kitai, T.; Tani, T.; Kita, T.; et al. Successful Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Infarct Size and Preserves Myocardial Viability: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2011, 23, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Haeck, J.D.; Kuijt, W.J.; Koch, K.T.; Bilodeau, L.; Henriques, J.P.; Rohling, W.J.; Baan, J.; Vis, M.M.; Nijveldt, R.; van Geloven, N.; et al. Infarct Size and Left Ventricular Function in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Resolution of ST-Segment Elevation (PREPARE) Trial: Ancillary Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. Heart 2010, 96, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zia, M.I.; Ghugre, N.R.; Connelly, K.A.; Joshi, S.B.; Strauss, B.H.; Cohen, E.A.; Wright, G.A.; Dick, A.J. Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated with Reduced Myocardial Edema, Hemorrhage, Microvascular Obstruction and Left Ventricular Remodeling. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. Off. J. Soc. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2012, 14, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jenča, D.; Melenovský, V.; Stehlik, J.; Staněk, V.; Kettner, J.; Kautzner, J.; Adámková, V.; Wohlfahrt, P. Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Predictors. ESC Heart Fail. 2020, 8, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bhar-Amato, J.; Davies, W.; Agarwal, S. Ventricular Arrhythmia after Acute Myocardial Infarction: ‘The Perfect Storm’. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. Rev. 2017, 6, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sardella, G.; Mancone, M.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C.; Agati, L.; Scardala, R.; Carbone, I.; Francone, M.; Di Roma, A.; Benedetti, G.; Conti, G.; et al. Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improves Myocardial Reperfusion and Reduces Infarct Size: The EXPIRA (Thrombectomy with Export Catheter in Infarct-Related Artery during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) Prospective, Randomized Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 53, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jolly, S.S.; James, S.; Džavík, V.; Cairns, J.A.; Mahmoud, K.D.; Zijlstra, F.; Yusuf, S.; Olivecrona, G.K.; Renlund, H.; Gao, P.; et al. Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis: Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration. Circulation 2017, 135, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stone, G.W.; Maehara, A.; Witzenbichler, B.; Godlewski, J.; Parise, H.; Dambrink, J.-H.E.; Ochala, A.; Carlton, T.W.; Cristea, E.; Wolff, S.D.; et al. Intracoronary Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Anterior Myocardial Infarction: The INFUSE-AMI Randomized Trial. JAMA 2012, 307, 1817–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Carlo, M.; Aquaro, G.D.; Palmieri, C.; Guerra, E.; Misuraca, L.; Giannini, C.; Lombardi, M.; Berti, S.; Petronio, A.S. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Thrombectomy versus No Thrombectomy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Thrombus-Rich Lesions: MUS℡A (MUltidevice Thrombectomy in Acute ST-Segment ELevation Acute Myocardial Infarction) Trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012, 5, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 05000 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart detailing the study protocol. Abbreviations: AT—aspirational thrombectomy; AUC—area under the curve; CKMB—creatinine kinase MB isoform; CMR—cardiac magnetic resonance; LV—left ventricle; LVEDV—left ventricle end—diastolic volume; LVEF—left ventricle ejection fraction; MI—myocardial infarction; MVO—microvascular obstruction; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 1. Flowchart detailing the study protocol. Abbreviations: AT—aspirational thrombectomy; AUC—area under the curve; CKMB—creatinine kinase MB isoform; CMR—cardiac magnetic resonance; LV—left ventricle; LVEDV—left ventricle end—diastolic volume; LVEF—left ventricle ejection fraction; MI—myocardial infarction; MVO—microvascular obstruction; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.
Jcm 11 05000 g001
Jcm 11 05000 g002 550
Figure 2. Example CMR images of a patient treated with PCI only. Index T2-weighted triple inversion recovery (A) and late gadolinium enhancement imaging (B) and CMR follow-up late gadolinium enhancement (C) imaging acquired in the short axis. Blue arrows—area at risk; yellow arrows—late gadolinium enhancement; *—microvascular obstruction.
Figure 2. Example CMR images of a patient treated with PCI only. Index T2-weighted triple inversion recovery (A) and late gadolinium enhancement imaging (B) and CMR follow-up late gadolinium enhancement (C) imaging acquired in the short axis. Blue arrows—area at risk; yellow arrows—late gadolinium enhancement; *—microvascular obstruction.
Jcm 11 05000 g002
Jcm 11 05000 g003 550
Figure 3. Example CMR images of a patient treated with an AT + PCI. Index T2-weighted triple inversion recovery (A) and late gadolinium enhancement imaging (B) and CMR follow-up late gadolinium enhancement (C) imaging acquired in the short axis. Blue arrows—area at risk; yellow arrows—late gadolinium enhancement; *—microvascular obstruction.
Figure 3. Example CMR images of a patient treated with an AT + PCI. Index T2-weighted triple inversion recovery (A) and late gadolinium enhancement imaging (B) and CMR follow-up late gadolinium enhancement (C) imaging acquired in the short axis. Blue arrows—area at risk; yellow arrows—late gadolinium enhancement; *—microvascular obstruction.
Jcm 11 05000 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics.
AT + PCI (n = 35)PCI Only (n = 17)p Value
Age (years)55 (16.5)57 (20.0)1.00
Body mass index (kg/m2)27.8 (3.4)28.4 (3.9)0.67
Sex: male (n, %)23 (65.7%)14 (82.4%)0.80
Hypertension (n, %)26 (74.3%)6 (35.3%)0.23
Diabetes (n, %)8 (22.9%)3 (17.6%)0.43
Dyslipidaemia (n, %)26 (74.3%)12 (70.6%)0.42
Smoking (n, %)23 (65.7%)8 (47.1%)0.30
Parameters on admission
Total ischemia time (min)240 (110)300 (250)0.37
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125 (32)130 (30)0.55
Heart rate (beats per minute)80 (15)75 (30)0.96
Killip Class 0–1 (n, %)34 (97.1%)16 (94.1%)0.26
Previous myocardial infarction (n, %)3 (8.6%)1 (5.9%)0.85
Anterior myocardial infarction (n, %)14 (40.0%)10 (58.8%)0.37
Results were shown as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables or n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: AT—aspirational thrombectomy; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.
Table
Table 2. Angiographic parameters.
Table 2. Angiographic parameters.
AT + PCI (n = 35)PCI Only (n = 17)p Value
Multivessel disease (n, %)23 (65.7%)12 (70.6%)0.60
IRA reference diameter (mm)3.12 (0.38)3.02 (0.56)0.40
IRA location (n, %) 0.41
LAD16 (45.7%)10 (58.8%)
LCx3 (8.6%)0 (0%)
RCA16 (45.7%)7 (41.2%)
Rentrop Grade (n, %) 0.08
210 (28.6%)3 (17.6%)
114 (40.0%)3 (17.6%)
011 (31.4%)11 (64.7%)
TIMI Thrombus Grade (n, %) 0.40
529 (82.9%)13 (76.5%)
45 (14.2%)2 (11.8%)
3 or less1 (2.6%)2 (11.8%)
Final TMPG (n, %) 0.26
2 or more30 (85.7%)10 (58.8%)
1 or less5 (14.3%)7 (41.2%)
Embolization (n, %)9 (25.7%)4 (23.5%)0.86
Direct stenting (n, %)15 (42.9%)1 (5.9%)0.014
Results were shown as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables or n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: AT—aspirational thrombectomy; IRA—infarct-related artery; TIMI—thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; TMPG—TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.
Table
Table 3. Biochemical, electrocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance parameters.
Table 3. Biochemical, electrocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance parameters.
AT + PCI (n = 28)PCI Only (n = 17)p Value
CKMB AUC (U/l)10,787 (12,815)6337 (5597)0.09
ST segment elevation18 (12.0)15 (10.0)0.32
on admission
ST segment elevation post PCI
Directly post PCI7 (5.8)7 (8.0)0.47
1 h post PCI4 (4.5)4 (4.0)0.72
2 h post PCI3 (3.0)3 (3.0)0.27
LVEDV (mL)
Index142.6 (40.1)127.8 (45.5)0.54
Follow-up149.2 (54.8)158.0 (75.0)0.26
∆LVEDV8.7 (19.3)20.0 (20.5)0.004
LV remodelling
∆LVEDV >12% (n, %)3 (8.6%)9 (52.9%)0.019
LVEF (%)
Index37.8 (16.7)45.7 (14.7)0.96
Follow-up44.2 (19.4)43.5 (11.4)0.98
∆LVEF5.8 (10.1)4.0 (6.3)0.41
MI size (g)
Index28.0 (21.5)25.0 (15.0)0.39
Follow-up19.8 (13.0)16.9 (12.2)0.55
MI size reduction−7.8 (10.8)−4.5 (4.8)0.03
MI size/LV mass (%)
Index 18.7 (11.3)15.8 (8.5)0.23
Follow-up 14.0 (11.7)15.4 (9.8)0.89
MVO (g)4.0 (5.4)6.0 (6.1)0.26
MVO/MI (%)11.7 (9.0)22.2 (26.9)0.009
MSI (%)
Index0.5 (0.3)0.4 (0.3)0.42
Follow-up0.7 (0.2)0.6 (0.2)0.11
Results are shown as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables or n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: AT—aspirational thrombectomy; CKMB—creatinine kinase MB isoform; LV—left ventricle; LVEDV—left ventricle end—diastolic volume; LVEF—left ventricle ejection fraction; MI—myocardial infarction; MVO—microvascular obstruction; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zajdel, W.; Miszalski-Jamka, T.; Zalewski, J.; Legutko, J.; Żmudka, K.; Paszek, E. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Shows Improved Outcomes in Patients with an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a High Thrombus Burden Treated with Adjuvant Aspiration Thrombectomy. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5000. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175000

AMA Style

Zajdel W, Miszalski-Jamka T, Zalewski J, Legutko J, Żmudka K, Paszek E. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Shows Improved Outcomes in Patients with an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a High Thrombus Burden Treated with Adjuvant Aspiration Thrombectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(17):5000. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175000

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zajdel, Wojciech, Tomasz Miszalski-Jamka, Jarosław Zalewski, Jacek Legutko, Krzysztof Żmudka, and Elżbieta Paszek. 2022. "Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Shows Improved Outcomes in Patients with an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a High Thrombus Burden Treated with Adjuvant Aspiration Thrombectomy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 17: 5000. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175000

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop