Next Article in Journal
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Diseases and Human Well-Being
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D Status and Steatohepatitis in Obese Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Accelerated Aging on the Wear Behavior of Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners—A Hip Simulator Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Status and Risk of Noncompliance of Adherence to Medications for Metabolic Diseases According to Occupational Characteristics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 15
10.3390/jcm11154488
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Tg/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio Highlights a Higher Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with Severe Obesity

by
Giorgio Radetti
1,*,
Graziano Grugni
2,
Fiorenzo Lupi
3,
Antonio Fanolla
4,
Diana Caroli
2,
Adele Bondesan
2 and
Alessandro Sartorio
2
1
Marienklinik, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
2
Experimental Laboratory for Auxo-Endocrinological Research, Division of Auxology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy
3
Newborn Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
4
Observatory for Health Provincial Government South Tyrol, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4488; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154488
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 11 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 1 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Challenges in Metabolic Syndrome)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Few data are currently available on the reliability of the different anthropometric, instrumental and biochemical indexes in recognizing the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children and adolescents with severe obesity. Therefore, the objective of our study was to find out the simplest and most accurate predictive index of MetS in this population at-risk. In 1065 children and adolescents (563 f, 502 m), aged 14.6 ± 2.1 years (range 10–17), with severe obesity [BMI-SDS 3.50 ± 0.36 (range 3.00–5.17)], the following indexes were evaluated: BMI, BMI-SDS, Tri-Ponderal Mass Index, Waist-to-Height ratio, TG/HDL-Cholesterol ratio, Cardiometabolic Index (CMI), and Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI). For each subject, all the components of MetS, defined according to the IDF criteria, were determined. Overall, the presence of MetS was found in 324 patients (30.4%), 167 males (33.3%) and 157 females (27.9%). According to the ROC analysis, three indexes (VAI, CMI and TG/HDL-Cholesterol ratio), performed significantly better than the other ones in identifying MetS, with no difference among them. In conclusion, the TG/HDL ratio, which just needs the evaluation of two simple biochemical parameters, offers the same accuracy as other more sophisticated indexes in recognizing MetS in children and adolescents with severe obesity, thus making it the best predictor to be easily used.

1. Introduction

Pediatric obesity is one of the major public health concerns of the current century, with an increasing prevalence of severe forms over the last decades [1,2,3]. This problem has further worsened due as a result of the recent COVID 19 pandemic, which has led to a significant increase of obesity as a result of its negative influence on lifestyles [4]. Since severe obesity is closely associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) [5], which is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), this situation has consequently had a significant impact on health services as well as on socioeconomic system [6,7]. For this reason, it is necessary to have tools available to identify those patients with obesity at risk of developing MetS at an early stage. For this purpose, several indexes have been proposed over the years with the aim of the early detection of the presence of MetS in obese subjects. Body Mass Index (BMI) is the most commonly used surrogate index in clinical practice, even if it does not discriminate fat mass from lean mass or consider fat distribution. Given that the amount of fat mass and its distribution are believed to be the most important metabolic risk factors [8,9], other indexes based on these parameters have been subsequently developed. In this respect, several authors have proposed indexes which define adiposity (Fat Mass Index (FMI) [10], Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI) [11], or that assess body fat distribution [Waist Circumference (WC) [12], Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) [13], Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) [14], or Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI) [15]. In addition, the Cardiometabolic Index (CMI), consisting of indexes of adiposity and blood lipids included in the criteria of MetS, and the triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio were both reported as accurate measures for predicting MetS [16,17,18]. So far, no consensus has been reached on which index is the best one. The objective is to find the simplest and least expensive tool that can identify the probability of having MetS in obese subjects, avoiding unnecessary investigation. In this context, we have previously compared indexes requiring or not instrumental support in a large group of children and adolescents, with different degrees of obesity [19]. We demonstrated that the indexes that considered body composition, as assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA), did not perform better than BMI for detecting MetS. More recently, we have demonstrated that the evaluation of body composition throughout BIA did not add any additional value to simple anthropometric measures, such as BMI or WtHR, in identifying the risk of MetS in a large number of obese women [19].
Little data is currently available on the reliability of the different indexes in recognizing the presence of MetS in severe childhood obesity. Vizzuso et al. [20], evaluating a cohort of 637 obese children and adolescent, including 215 patients with BMI z-score > 3, found a higher VAI in patients with MetS compared to the subgroup without MetS. Interestingly, these authors demonstrated that VAI was the best predictor of MetS when compared to BMI z-score, A Body Shape Index (ABSI) z-score and WtHR z-score.
With this background, in the present study we compared the accuracy of a group of indexes, which only consider anthropometric measures and simple biochemical data, in a large group of severely obese children and adolescents. The objective was to find out a simple and accurate index to be used for the prediction of MetS in this population at-risk, in which its early detection is mandatory in order to avoid serious metabolic and cardiovascular complications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

A retrospective cohort study based on 1065 children and adolescents with severe obesity [563 females, 502 males, aged 14.6 ± 2.1 (range 10–17) years, height standard deviation score (SDS) 0.35 ± 0.96 (range −1.58/3.97) and BMI SDS 3.50 ± 0.36 (range 3.00–5.17)], consecutively hospitalized at the Division of Auxology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piancavallo, Verbania, Italy between January 2018 and January 2021 was performed. All but 51 (4.8%) patients were Caucasian. All of the subjects suffered from essential obesity, other genetic, organic, endocrine or iatrogenic forms having been excluded. None of them had received treatment with any drug known to interfere with metabolism, such as oral contraceptives and anorectic, antihypertensive, lipid lowering, or insulin sensitizer drugs during the previous 12 months. Pubertal development was assessed according to Tanner classification [21]. One hundred and fifteen patients were prepubertal (stage 1), 488 were pubertal (stage 2–4), and 462 were fully developed (stage 5). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Istituto Auxologico Italiano (ref. no. 01C822; acronym: METOBIP). At the admission to our Institute, written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians for the use of all biochemical and anthropometric parameters collected during hospitalization, as well as written assent from children and adolescents. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with the 2005 Additional Protocol to the European Convention of Human Rights and Medicine concerning Biomedical Research.

2.2. Anthropometric Data

All subjects underwent body measurements wearing light underwear, in fasting conditions after voiding. Physical examination included the determination of height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) by the same trained operators, according to the Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual [22]. Standing height was determined by a Harpenden Stadiometer (Holtain Limited, Crymych, Dyfed, UK). Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale (Ro WU 150, Wunder Sa.bi., Trezzo sull’Adda, Italy). WC was determined in standing position midway between the lowest rib and the top of the iliac crest after gentle expiration, with a non-elastic flexible tape measure.

2.3. Blood Pressure Measurements

Diastolic and systolic blood pressure (BP) were measured to the nearest 2 mmHg in the supine position after 5 min rest, using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer with an appropriately sized cuff. The average of three measurements on different days was used.

2.4. Laboratory Analyses

Baseline blood samples were drawn by venipuncture after a 12-h overnight fast. Measurements of glycemia, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were performed by standard enzymatic methods (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

2.5. Definitions

Severe obesity was considered to be a BMI ≥ 3.00 SDS (>99th percentile) [23,24], using the World Health Organization (WHO) reference charts [25]. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria [26], MetS was defined in the presence of abdominal obesity [WC ≥ 90th percentile for ages < 16 years [27], and 94 cm for males and 80 cm for female for ages > 16 years] plus two or more of the following four parameters: high systolic BP and/or diastolic BP, high triglycerides, low HDL-C, and elevated fasting glucose. Hypertension was defined as values of systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg. Hypertriglyceridemia was defined in the presence of triglycerides values ≥ 150 mg/dL (≥1.7 mmol/L). A reduced HDL-C level was defined with values < 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) for males and females for ages < 16 years, and <40 mg/dL for males and <50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) for females for ages > 16 years. Elevated fasting glucose was defined as glycemia ≥ 5.6 mmol/L (or ≥100 mg/dL).
The following indexes were calculated according to the following formulas:
BMI [28]: weight (kg)/height in m2
BMI SDS [28]: (BMI-mean BMI (for age and sex))/SD
TMI [11]: mass (kg)/height (m3)
WtHR [14]: WC (cm)/height (cm)
TG/HDL-C ratio [29]: TG (mmol/L)/HDL-C (mmol/L)
CMI [30]: WtHR × TG/HDL-C ratio
VAI [13]:
males: (WC/39.68 + (1.88 × BMI)) × (TG/1.03) × (1.31/HDL)
females: (WC/36.58 + (1.89 × BMI)) × (TG/0.81) × (1.52/HDL)

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data (VAI, TG/HDL, CMI) were first scrutinized for outliers using a cutoff of 4.5 SDS. No patient was excluded on this basis. A Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess normality of each continuous variable; all tested variables were non-normally distributed. The analysis of the distribution graphs confirmed that it was not possible to make assumptions of normality. To explore the data, preliminary analyses by gender and by having MetS or not having it were performed. Continuous data were presented as median (interquartile range). Median values were tested for statistical significance using a two-tailed Wilcoxon test and a nonparametric one-way ANOVA. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between TG/HDL-C ratio and metabolic characteristics.
An adjusted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using clinical cut points for metabolic risks was performed to determinate the odds ratio of cardiometabolic risk factors across the TG/HDL-C ratio. ROC curves were generated in order to obtain the values of area under the curve (AUC), with sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CI, for the age-adjusted standardized body composition indexes as predictors of MetS [31]. To identify the optimal cut-off, the Youden index [32] was calculated. In addition, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were examined.
In order to calculate the growth pattern of the body-composition index a quantile regression was used [33] as an alternative for the LMS Method [34], with body composition indexes as a response, fitted with a parametric model which involved age. The standardized residuals were retained to represent age-adjusted values.
The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05. The data were analyzed using SAS Enterprise Guide 4.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

The clinical and biochemical data, together with the different indexes in boys and girls, are shown in Table 1. According to the IDF criteria for MetS, all but two females fulfilled the criteria for abdominal obesity. High triglycerides values were found in 119 patients (59 males) (11.2%), while 483 had reduced HDL-C levels (222 males) (45.3%). High BP was detected in 535 subjects (291 males) (50.2%). Raised fasting glucose was found in eight individuals (4 males) (0.7%). Several significant differences were found between the two genders, while insulin, HOMA-IR, LDL-C and WtHR were comparable. Overall, boys showed a worse metabolic profile, higher WC and blood pressure than girls, although the latter had a higher BMI. Boys had lower VAI and TMI and higher TG/HDL-C ratio and CMI than girls.
In Table 2, the same parameters are reported according to the presence or absence of MetS. Overall, the presence of MetS was found in 324 patients (30.4%), 167 males (33.3%) and 157 females (27.9%) (not significant). As expected, the metabolic profile was significantly worse in the MetS group, with the only exception being glucose level, which was not different between the two subgroups.
In Figure 1 and Figure 2 the ROC curves in boys and girls are reported, respectively, showing the best performance of VAI, CMI and TG/HDL-C ratio in identifying MetS. No difference was found among these indexes (Supplementary Materials Table S1).
In Table 3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of VAI, CMI and TG/HDL-C ratio are reported. In boys, no difference among the three indexes for all parameters was found. Otherwise, in girls, CMI showed, on one hand, less sensitivity compared to the other indexes, and on the other hand the best specificity positive predictive values and the best positive likelihood ratio. The PLR of the three indexes were useful as predictive values for MetS in boys, while in girls only CMI was found to be useful. The negative likelihood ratio was similar in all subjects.
Consequently, the TG/HDL-C ratio was chosen as the preferred index due to its simplicity, because it did not require any additional anthropometric measures as compared to VAI and CMI.
In Table 4, the correlation between TG/HDL-C ratio and the metabolic factors in boys and girls is reported. A strong correlation with the clinical and biochemical parameters of MetS was detected in both sexes, except for serum glucose level.
In Table 5 the odds ratio between TG/HDL-C ratio with the different cardiometabolic risk factors are reported. In both sexes, a strong association between TG/HDL-C ratio and high triglycerides and low HDL-C was found.
In Figure 3 the trend of TG/HDL-C ratio, according to age and sex, is shown. The mean difference of the cut-off values calculated at all ages between the two sexes was always significant (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

A substantial increase in the rates of severe obesity in children and adolescents has been demonstrated over the past decades, and this phenomenon appears to be nearly universal and not limited to a particular region [35]. The prevalence of severe obesity among subjects aged 2–19 years in United States, from the years 1971–1974 to the years 2017–2018, raised from 1.0% to 6.1% [36]. More recently, however, the assessment of changes over time for nine European countries showed a decrease of severe childhood obesity (starting from 2007–2008) in three of them, including Italy [2]. Despite this reduction, the overall levels of obesity in Italy remain among the highest in Europe [37], and in 2010 it was estimated that around 50,000 children eight to nine years of age suffered from severe obesity according to WHO criteria [38].
The significance of severe obesity on associated morbidity at an early age should be readily investigated. In our cohort of 1065 subjects we found the presence of MetS in 324 of them, with a prevalence almost double in comparison to previously reported data (30.4% vs. 16.7%) using the same criteria to define severe obesity [20]. This discrepancy might be related to the different clinical characteristics of the study groups, including age-range and number of subjects. In this context, a simple, reliable, and minimally invasive index should be necessary in order to screen for the presence of MetS in a population of severe obese children and adolescents at high risk for metabolic and cardiac disease. For this purpose, in this study we have selected indexes based on anthropometric data only or with the simple addition of routine biochemical parameters, such as triglycerides and HDL cholesterol, avoiding those indexes which require an instrumental support to evaluate body composition. We found that three indexes (i.e., VAI, CMI and TG/HDL-C ratio), performed significantly better than the other ones (i.e., BMI, BMI SDS, WtHR and TMI), with no difference among them. As a result, we only considered the best performing indexes. In this regard, we were quite surprised by the absence of differences between the selected ones, since VAI and CMI take into consideration not only triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels but also measures of body excess and fat distribution, the latter being actually considered a marker for a higher risk of cardiometabolic diseases. A likely explanation might be that we studied a very peculiar population, i.e., a group of extremely obese adolescents with a BMI SDS of more than 3 SDS. Presumably because of this condition, these subjects already have a consolidated deranged metabolic milieu and this situation could explain why measures of body excess and fat distribution, which are fundamentally risk factors for metabolic derangements, have exhausted their role.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were not different in boys for all indexes, while in girls CMI showed less sensitivity compared to the other two indexes, but the best specificity, best positive predictive values and the best positive likelihood ratio. The positive likelihood ratio of all indexes was found to be useful in boys as a predictor of MetS, while in girls only CMI was useful. The negative likelihood ratio was similar in all subjects.
Consequently, we choose the TG/HDL-C ratio as the simplest index. In our study the TG/HDL-C ratio showed a strong correlation with the clinical and biochemical parameters of MetS, but not with glucose levels. The odds ratio showed a strong association of TG/HDL-C ratio with the high triglycerides and low HDL-C, but not with glucose level, blood pressure and waist circumference. Overall, these data confirmed previous observations, showing that the TG/HDL-C ratio had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MetS in children and adolescents as well as in adult patients with obesity [39,40,41]. Furthermore, the usefulness of the TG/HDL-C ratio in identifying worsened cardiometabolic profile and preclinical signs of organ damage has been previously reported in both obese and non-obese children [42,43].
Another aim of our study was to verify whether the cutoff of TG/HDL-C ratio for detecting the risk of MetS varied by sex and age. Thus, the trend of the TG/HDL-C ratio was calculated in boys and girls of different ages. In both genders a clear increase over the years was observed (Figure 3), this age-dependent trend requiring to be considered when interpreting the meaning of the calculated index.
Conversely to what was observed in a previous paper by our group, showing that BMI was similar to other indexes in detecting MetS in children and adolescents [15], in the present study BMI proved to be less accurate in identifying MetS than the TG/HDL-C ratio. In our opinion, the reason for this difference could be the choice of the population evaluated, as the SDS BMI was equal to or greater than 3.00 SDS in all patients in the present study, unlike our previous study. The different degree of obesity could explain why BMI, which is actually a risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases and is very reliable in a population of overweight or mild obese subjects, does not show the same accuracy in a population where the metabolic status is already severely compromised and where the anthropometric measures no longer play any prognostic role.
The strength of this study is the large number of subjects enrolled, which results in an adequate statistical analysis. In addition, the recruitment of children and adolescents with severe obesity was made in a single third level center, with the same well-trained medical staff and the same laboratory. However, there are some limitations to our study. Since our investigation is a cross-sectional study, we are unable to predict whether the MetS will persist in our patients or will appear in the future in those patients who are borderline for developing MetS. Another weakness is that the vast majority of patients were Caucasian, and its findings may not be extended to other ethnic groups.
In conclusion, TG/HDL ratio, which just needs the evaluation of two simple biochemical parameters, offers the same accuracy as other more sophisticated indexes in recognizing MetS in children and adolescents with severe obesity, thus resulting as the best predictor that can be easily used.
Finally, our results suggest that changes in the TG/HDL-C ratio over the years should be considered in order to ensure the timely diagnosis of MetS and to set the most age-appropriate therapeutic and rehabilitative approaches [44].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11154488/s1, Table S1: ROC Contrast Estimation and Testing Results by Row among BMI, BMI-SDS, TMI, WtHR, TG HDL, CMI, VAI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.R., G.G. and A.S.; methodology, G.R. and G.G.; validation, G.R., G.G. and A.S.; database management, D.C. and A.B.; data analysis and statistics, F.L. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, G.R.; writing—review and editing, G.G. and A.S.; supervision, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Istituto Auxologico Italiano (ref. no. 01C822; acronym: METOBIP).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians for the use of all biochemical and anthropometric parameters collected during hospitalization, as well as written assent from children and adolescents.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author or will be available on Zenodo.org after the Authors will have the definitive doi number of the paper available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Spinelli, A.; Buoncristiano, M.; Kovacs, V.A.; Yngve, A.; Spiroski, I.; Obreja, G.; Starc, G.; Pérez, N.; Rito, A.I.; Kunešová, M.; et al. Prevalence of Severe Obesity among Primary School Children in 21 European Countries. Obes. Facts 2019, 12, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organisation (WHO). Obesity and Overweight. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 24 January 2022).
  4. Browne, N.T.; Snethen, J.A.; Greenberg, C.S.; Frenn, M.; Kilanowski, J.F.; Gance-Cleveland, B.; Burke, P.J.; Lewandowski, L. When Pandemics Collide: The Impact of COVID-19 on Childhood Obesity. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2021, 56, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chung, Y.L.; Rhie, Y.J. Severe Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Metabolic Effects, Assessment, and Treatment. J. Obes. Metab. Syndr. 2021, 30, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kinge, J.M.; Morris, S. The Impact of Childhood Obesity on Health and Health Service Use. Health Serv. Res. 2018, 53, 1621–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. World Health Organization. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, S.H.; Després, J.P.; Koh, K.K. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: Friend or foe? Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 3560–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Xu, H.; Jin, C.; Guan, Q. Causal Effects of Overall and Abdominal Obesity on Insulin Resistance and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Allison, D.B.; Zhu, S.K.; Plankey, M.; Faith, M.S.; Heo, M. Differential associations of body mass index and adiposity with all cause mortality among men in the first and second National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES I and NHANES II) follow-up studies. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2002, 26, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Peterson, C.M.; Su, H.; Thomas, D.M.; Heo, M.; Golnabi, A.H.; Pietrobelli, A.; Heymsfield, S.B. Tri-ponderal mass index vs body mass index in estimating body fat during adolescence. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rankinen, T.; Kim, S.Y.; Perusse, L.; Despres, J.P.; Bouchard, C. The prediction of abdominal visceral fat level from body composition and anthropometry: ROC analysis. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1999, 23, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Amato, M.C.; Giordano, C.; Galia, M.; Criscimanna, A.; Vitabile, S.; Midiri, M.; Galluzzo, A.; AlkaMeSy Study Group. Visceral Adiposity Index: A reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Maffeis, C.; Banzato, C.; Talamini, G. Obesity Study Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology. Waist-to-height ratio, a useful index to identify high metabolic risk in overweight children. J. Pediatr. 2008, 152, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Radetti, G.; Fanolla, A.; Grugni, G.; Lupi, F.; Sartorio, A. Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents: Which is the best? Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 29, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Datta Banik, S.; Pacheco-Pantoja, E.; Lugo, R.; Gómez-de-Regil, L.; Chim Aké, R.; Méndez González, R.M.; Gutiérrez Solis, A.L. Evaluation of Anthropometric Indexes and Lipid Parameters to Predict Metabolic Syndrome Among Adults in Mexico. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021, 14, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krawczyk, M.; Rumińska, M.; Witkowska-Sędek, E.; Majcher, A.; Pyrżak, B. Usefulness of the Triglycerides to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) in prediction of metabolic syndrome in Polish obese children and adolescents. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2018, 65, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aslan Çin, N.N.; Yardımcı, H.; Koç, N.; Uçaktürk, S.A.; Akçil Ok, M. Triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a predictor similar to the triglyceride-glucose index for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome using International Diabetes Federation criteria of insulin resistance in obese adolescents: A cross-sectional study. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 33, 777–784. [Google Scholar]
  19. Radetti, G.; Fanolla, A.; Grugni, G.; Lupi, F.; Tamini, S.; Cicolini, S.; Sartorio, A. The Role of Different Indexes of Adiposity and Body Composition for the Identification of Metabolic Syndrome in Women with Obesity. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vizzuso, S.; Del Torto, A.; Dilillo, D.; Calcaterra, V.; Di Profio, E.; Leone, A.; Gilardini, L.; Bertoli, S.; Battezzati, A.; Zuccotti, G.V.; et al. Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: No Association with Daily Energy Intake but Promising Tool to Identify Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Nutrients 2021, 13, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tanner, J.M.; Whitehouse, R.H. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity and stages of puberty. Arch. Dis. Child. 1976, 51, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lohman, T.G.; Roche, A.F.; Martorell, R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual; Human Kinetics Books: Champaign, IL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  23. Barlow, S.E.; Expert Committee. Recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: Summary report. Pediatrics 2007, 120, S164–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Valerio, G.; Maffeis, C.; Saggese, G.; Ambruzzi, M.A.; Balsamo, A.; Bellone, S.; Bergamini, M.; Bernasconi, S.; Bona, G.; Calcaterra, V.; et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pediatric obesity: Consensus position statement of the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology and the Italian Society of Pediatrics. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2018, 44, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. The WHO Child Growth Standards. Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/child-growth-standards/standards (accessed on 15 February 2022).
  26. Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.; Kaufmann, F.; Tajima, N.; Silink, M.; Arslanian, S.; Wong, G.; Bennet, P.; Shaw, J.; Caprio, S. IDF consensus group. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents-An IDF consensus report. Pediatr. Diabetes 2007, 8, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McCharty, H.D.; Jarret, K.V.; Crawley, H.F. The development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5.0-16.9 y. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 55, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. WHO Fact Sheet No. 311. 2014. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/# (accessed on 17 December 2021).
  29. Quijada, Z.; Paoli, M.; Zerpa, Y.; Camacho, N.; Cichetti, R.; Villarroel, V.; Arata-Bellabarba, G.; Lanes, R. The triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio as a marker of cardiovascular risk in obese children; association with traditional and emergent risk factors. Pediatric Diabetes 2008, 9, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wakabayashi, I.; Daimon, T. The “cardiometabolic index” as a new marker determined by adiposity and blood lipids for discrimination of diabetes mellitus. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 438, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Srinivasan, S.R.; Chen, W.; Malina, R.M.; Bouchard, C.; Berenson, G.S. Body mass index, waist circumference, and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in a biracial sample of children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004, 114, e198–e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Youden, W.J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950, 3, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, C. Growth Charts of Body Mass Index (BMI) with Quantile Regression. 2005. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Colin-Chen-4/publication/220979218_Growth_Charts_of_Body_Mass_Index_BMI_With_Quantile_Regression/links/02bfe50ef9479c0a2f000000/Growth-Charts-of-Body-Mass-Index-BMI-With-Quantile-Regression.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  34. Cole, T.J.; Freeman, J.V.; Preece, M.A. British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1998, 17, 407–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pinhas-Hamiel, O.; Hamiel, U.; Bendor, C.D.; Bardugo, A.; Twig, G.; Cukierman-Yaffe, T. The Global Spread of Severe Obesity in Toddlers, Children, and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes. Facts 2022, 15, 118–134. [Google Scholar]
  36. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Severe Obesity Among Children and Adolescents Aged 2–19 Years: United States, 1963–1965 through 2017–2018. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity-child-17-18/obesity-child.htm (accessed on 9 April 2022).
  37. Lauria, L.; Spinelli, A.; Buoncristiano, M.; Nardone, P. Decline of childhood overweight and obesity in Italy from 2008 to 2016: Results from 5 rounds of the population-based surveillance system. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 618. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lombardo, F.L.; Spinelli, A.; Lazzeri, G.; Lamberti, A.; Mazzarella, G.; Nardone, P.; Pilato, V.; Buoncristiano, M.; Caroli, M.; OKkio alla SALUTE Group 2010. Severe obesity prevalence in 8- to 9-year-old Italian children: A large population-based study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 69, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nur Zati Iwani, A.K.; Jalaludin, M.Y.; Yahya, A.; Mansor, F.; Md Zain, F.; Hong, J.Y.H.; Wan Mohd Zin, R.M.; Mokhtar, A.H. TG: HDL-C Ratio as Insulin Resistance Marker for Metabolic Syndrome in Children with Obesity. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 852290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chu, S.Y.; Jung, J.H.; Park, M.J.; Kim, S.H. Risk assessment of metabolic syndrome in adolescents using the triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Ann. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 24, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nie, G.; Hou, S.; Zhang, M.; Peng, W. High TG/HDL ratio suggests a higher risk of metabolic syndrome among an elderly Chinese population: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e041519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Di Bonito, P.; Moio, N.; Scilla, C.; Cavuto, L.; Sibilio, G.; Sanguigno, E.; Forziato, C.; Saitta, F.; Iardino, M.R.; Di Carluccio, C.; et al. Usefulness of the High Triglyceride-to- HDL Cholesterol Ratio to Identify Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Preclinical Signs of Organ Damage in Outpatient Children. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Di Bonito, P.; Valerio, G.; Grugni, G.; Licenziati, M.R.; Maffeis, C.; Manco, M.; Miraglia del Giudice, E.; Pacifico, L.; Pellegrin, M.C.; Tomat, M.; et al. CARdiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese children in ITALY (CARITALY) Study Group. Comparison of non-HDL-cholesterol versus triglycerides-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors and preclinical organ damage in overweight/obese children: The CARITALY study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 489–494. [Google Scholar]
  44. Grugni, G.; Licenziati, M.R.; Valerio, G.; Crinò, A.; Maffeis, C.; Tanas, R.; Morino, G.S.; Childhood Obesity Study Group of the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (ISPED). The rehabilitation of children and adolescents with severe or medically complicated obesity: An ISPED expert opinion document. Eat Weight Disord. 2017, 22, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 04488 g001 550
Figure 1. ROC curve in boys. Abbreviations: VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Figure 1. ROC curve in boys. Abbreviations: VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Jcm 11 04488 g001
Jcm 11 04488 g002 550
Figure 2. ROC curve in girls. Abbreviations: VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Figure 2. ROC curve in girls. Abbreviations: VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Jcm 11 04488 g002
Jcm 11 04488 g003 550
Figure 3. Trend of TG/HDL cutoff for MetS, according to age and sex. The mean difference of the cut-off values calculated at all ages between sexes (p < 0.05). Abbreviation: TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.
Figure 3. Trend of TG/HDL cutoff for MetS, according to age and sex. The mean difference of the cut-off values calculated at all ages between sexes (p < 0.05). Abbreviation: TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.
Jcm 11 04488 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical and biochemical data in boys and girls. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Table 1. Clinical and biochemical data in boys and girls. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Total (n = 1065)Boys (n = 502)Girls (n = 563)
Age (yr)14.9 (13–16.4)14.7 (12.7–16.2) &15 (13.2–16.5)
Weight (kg)105.2 (93.1–119.4)110.5 (93.1–126.9) *101.8 (93–114)
Height (cm)1.6 (1.6–1.7)1.7 (1.6–1.8)1.6 (1.6–1.7)
BMI (kg/m2)38.8 (36–42.6)38.3 (35.3–41.8) *39.3 (36.7–42.8)
BMI SDS3.5 (3.2–3.7)3.5 (3.3–3.7)3.4 (3.2–3.7)
Waist Circumference (cm)117 (107–126)120 (110–129) *115 (106–124)
Glucose (mmol/L)79 (74–84)80 (76–84) $79 (73–83)
Insulin (µU/mL)14.8 (10–19.9)15.3 (10–20.1)14.5 (10–19.7)
HOMA2.9 (1.9–3.9)3 (2–4.1)2.8 (1.9–3.8)
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)42 (36–49)41 (35–47) *44 (37–50)
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)104 (86–123)106.5 (87–126)102 (84–122)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)90 (69–119)93 (71–125) &88 (68–113)
SBP (mm/Hg)125 (120–130)130 (120–140) *120 (120–130)
DBP (mm/Hg)80 (70–80)80 (70–80) &80 (70–80)
VAI1.5 (1.1–2.2)1.4 (0.9–1.9) *1.7 (1.2–2.4)
WtHR (cm/cm)0.72 (0.67–0.76)0.71 (0.67–0.76)0.72 (0.66–0.77)
TMI (kg/m3)23.8 (22–25.9)22.7 (21.1–25) *24.5 (22.8–26.7)
TG/HDL0.9 (0.7–1.3)1 (0.7–1.4) *0.9 (0.6–1.2)
CMI0.7 (0.5–1)0.7 (0.5–1) *0.6 (0.4–0.9)
Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; BMI SDS: BMI standard deviation score; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index. For the difference between boys and girls: * p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.005; & p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Clinical and biochemical data subdivided according to the presence or absence of MetS. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Table 2. Clinical and biochemical data subdivided according to the presence or absence of MetS. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
MetSNo MetS
Number of subjects741324
Age (yr)15.8 (14.2–16.8) *14.5 (12.6–16)
Weight (kg)114.4 (100.8–130.6) *101.2 (90.1–115.8)
Height (cm)1.7 (1.6–1.7) *1.6 (1.6–1.7)
BMI (kg/m2)40 (37.3–43.9) *38.3 (35.7–41.7)
BMI SDS3.5 (3.3–3.8)3.4 (3.2–3.7)
WC (cm)123 (113–133) *115 (106–124)
Glucose (mmol/L)79 (75–84)79 (74–84)
Insulin (µU/mL)17.1 (13.1–22.8) *13.4 (9.3–18.7)
HOMA3.3 (2.5–4.6) *2.6 (1.8–3.7)
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)35 (32–38.5) *46 (41–51)
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)108 (86.5–127) &102 (86–123)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)117 (88–157) *83 (66–105)
SBP (mm/Hg)130 (130–140) *120 (120–130)
DBP (mm/Hg)80 (80–90) *80 (70–80)
VAI2.3 (1.7–3.3) *1.3 (0.9–1.7)
WtHR (cm/cm)0.73 (0.68–0.79) *0.71 (0.67–0.75)
TMI (kg/m3)24.1 (22.2–26.7) $23.6 (21.9–25.8)
TG/HDL1.5 (1.1–2.1) *0.8 (0.6–1.1)
CMI1.1 (0.8–1.5) *0.6 (0.4–0.8)
Abbreviations: MetS: Metabolic Syndrome; BMI: Body Mass Index; BMI SDS: BMI standard deviation score; WC: Waist Circumference; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; WtHR: Waist-to-Height ratio; TMI: Tri-Ponderal Mass Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index. For the difference between MetS and No Mets: * p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.01; & p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of VAI (a), CMI (b) and TG/HDL-Cholesterol (c).
Table 3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of VAI (a), CMI (b) and TG/HDL-Cholesterol (c).
(a)
BoysGirls
Sensitivity0.713 (0.673–0.752)0.752 (0.716–0.787)
Specificity0.854 (0.823–0.885)0.724 (0.687–0.761)
PPV0.708 (0.669–0.748)0.513 (0.472–0.554)
NPV0.856 (0.826–0.887)0.883 (0.856–0.909)
PLR4.92.7
NLR0.30.3
(b)
BoysGirls
Sensitivity0.719 (0.679–0.758)0.65 (0.61–0.689) *
Specifity0.836 (0.803–0.868)0.872 (0.844–0.9) *
PPV0.686 (0.645–0.726)0.662 (0.623–0.701) *
NPV0.856 (0.826–0.887)0.866 (0.837–0.894)
PLR4.45.1 *
NLR0.30.4
(c)
BoysGirls
Sensitivity0.725 (0.685–0.764)0.745 (0.709–0.781)
Specifity0.845 (0.813–0.876)0.724 (0.687–0.761)
PPV0.699 (0.659–0.74)0.511 (0.47–0.552)
NPV0.86 (0.83–0.891)0.88 (0.853–0.907)
PLR4.72.7
NLR0.30.4
Abbreviations: VAI: Visceral Adiposity Index; CMI: Cardiometabolic Index; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. For significance: * p < 0.05 compared to the other indices.
Table
Table 4. Bivariate correlation coefficients between TG/HDL and metabolic characteristics.
Table 4. Bivariate correlation coefficients between TG/HDL and metabolic characteristics.
TotalBoysGirls
Weight (kg)0.25 *0.25 *0.08
Height (cm)0.19 *0.19 *0.04
BMI (kg/m2)0.22 *0.22 *0.08
WC (cm)0.23 *0.23 *0.17 *
Glucose (mmol/L)−0.010.000.04
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)−0.68 *−0.67 *−0.70 *
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)0.22 *0.22 *0.42 *
Triglycerides (mg/dL)0.89 *0.89 *0.90 *
SBP (mm/Hg)0.11 &0.11 &0.10 &
DBP (mm/Hg)0.080.080.05
BMI SDS0.16 $0.16 $0.08
Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; WC: Waist Circumference; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; SDS: standard deviation score. For significance: * p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.001; & p < 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for cardiometabolic risk factors across TG/HDL adjusted for age.
Table 5. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for cardiometabolic risk factors across TG/HDL adjusted for age.
Boys Girls
OR (95% CI)Pseudo R SquareOR (95% CI)Pseudo R Square
Large WC (IDF)n.c. *n.c. *267.1 (0.1 to infinite)0.138
High Glucose (IDF)1.7 (0.5–6.1)0.0251.8 (0.6–5.2)0.034
Low HDL cholesterol (IDF)17.1 (9.8–29.9) &0.4322.9 (12.4–42.2) &0.456
High Triglycerides (IDF)121.2 (39.6–370.6) &0.681167.3 (50.3–556.9) &0.759
High Blood Pressure (IDF)0.9 (0.6–1.2)0.191.3 (1–1.7)0.056
* Not calculated. All observations have the same response. Abbreviation: WC: Waist Circumference; IDF: International Diabetes Federation criteria; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; TG/HDL: triglyceride to high density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. For significance: & p < 0.0001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radetti, G.; Grugni, G.; Lupi, F.; Fanolla, A.; Caroli, D.; Bondesan, A.; Sartorio, A. High Tg/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio Highlights a Higher Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with Severe Obesity. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4488. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154488

AMA Style

Radetti G, Grugni G, Lupi F, Fanolla A, Caroli D, Bondesan A, Sartorio A. High Tg/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio Highlights a Higher Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with Severe Obesity. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(15):4488. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radetti, Giorgio, Graziano Grugni, Fiorenzo Lupi, Antonio Fanolla, Diana Caroli, Adele Bondesan, and Alessandro Sartorio. 2022. "High Tg/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio Highlights a Higher Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with Severe Obesity" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 15: 4488. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop