Next Article in Journal
Torsional Abnormality: The Forgotten Issue in the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Anterior Knee Pain Patient
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Clinical Outcome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Followed for More Than 20 Years: The Milan Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Consortium (SMiLE) Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Current and Innovated Managements for Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorders: An Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impacts of the Clinical and Genetic Factors on Chronic Damage in Caucasian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/jcm11123529
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Significance of Autoantibodies to Ki/SL as Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sicca Syndrome

by
Michael Mahler
1,*,
Chelsea Bentow
1,
Mary-Ann Aure
1,
Marvin J. Fritzler
2 and
Minoru Satoh
3
1
Werfen Autoimmunity, San Diego, CA 92131, USA
2
Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
3
Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3529; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123529
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 19 May 2022 / Accepted: 6 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anti-Ki/SL antibodies were first described in 1981 and have been associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sicca syndrome. Despite the long history, very little is known about this autoantibody system, and significant confusion persists. Anti-Ki/SL antibodies target a 32 kDa protein (also known as PSME3, HEL-S-283, PA28ƴ, REGƴ, proteasome activator subunit 3), which is part of the proteasome complex. Depending on the assay used and the cohort studied, the antibodies have been reported in approximately 20% of SLE patients with high disease specificity as compared to non-connective tissue disease controls. The aim of this review is to summarize the history and key publications, and to explore future direction of anti-Ki/SL antibodies.

1. Introduction

Although known for more than four decades (Figure 1), very few details are known about anti-Ki/SL antibodies, and confusion persists. Historically, the nomenclature of the Ki/SL target antigen included SL (Sicca Lupus), PL-2 and Ki [1,2]. In addition, several other names can be found, including PSME3, HEL-S-283, PA28ƴ, REGƴ, proteasome activator subunit 3. Eventually, it was concluded that this was indeed a single autoantibody system, now named Ki/SL. When anti-Ki antibodies were first described by Tojo et al. [3], and almost in parallel by Harmon et al. [4], as was the convention at the time, Tojo et al. named the novel autoantibody after the index patient Kikuta (Ki) [3], and Harmon et al. [4] choose to link it to the clinical association Sicca/lupus (SL). Early evidence using double immunodiffusion showed that they were identified in approximately 10% of SLE sera and were often associated with anti-Sm autoantibodies.
Initially, some sources confused the Ki with Ku/DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent phosphokinase catalytic subunit) [5], but it was clearly demonstrated that anti-Ki/SL autoantibodies recognize a 32 kDa protein, a soluble subunit of the nuclear PA-28 (proteasome activator) protein family, which is unrelated to the Ku/DNA-PKcs antigens [2]. The confusion from the study by Francoeur et al. [5] arose because the serum that Tojo sent to Francoeur contained both anti-Ku and Ki/SL antibodies. Due to the strong presence of Ku-specific bands in immunoprecipitation (IP), the 32 kDa protein band was overlooked, and it was concluded that anti-Ki and anti-Ku were identical. Unlike other systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-related autoantigens, such as Sm and U1RNP, Ki/SL was not associated with detectable RNA species [2]. Some studies focused on another autoantibody system in SLE termed Ki-67, which added to the confusion [6].

2. Materials and Methods

Due to the limited number of studies and the heterogenicity of methods and observations, our aim was to summarize the current knowledge in a narrative review using the search terms (Ki+ autoantibodies; SL+ autoantibodies, Ki/SL+ antibodies) instead of a systematic literature review.

3. Clinical and Demographic Association of Anti-Ki/SL Antibodies

Although there are no meta-data available as of today, mostly due to the limited number of studies and the heterogenicity of the methods used to detect anti-Ki/SL antibodies, we concluded that anti-Ki/SL antibodies are mostly found in SLE patients followed by patients with Sjögren syndrome (SjS) or Sicca syndrome [7,8], depending on the clinical definition. Especially in SLE, autoantibodies to a wide range of antigens have been reported, and anti-Ki/SL is part of the ever-expanding list [9]. High prevalence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies was also observed in patients with the overlap syndrome [3] and systemic sclerosis (SSc) [8,10]; however, in these studies, the number of patients was relatively small. In one of the earliest and largest clinical and serological studies of 516 connective tissue disease (CTD) patients, anti-Ki/SL autoantibodies were found in 12% of SLE patients, 14% of patients with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), 18% of patients with vasculopathies and 3% of patients with SjS [11]. Early clinical correlation studies focused on SLE patients indicated that anti-Ki/SL autoantibodies were associated with malar rash and multiple ANA specificities [7]. Another report of clinical, serological and HLA data from 119 SLE patients found no clear clinical associations with anti-Ki/SL antibodies, except for a higher frequency of non-infective fever [12], Sicca syndrome and skin involvement [13]. Fredi et al. [14] focused on anti-Ki-SL antibodies in SLE patients and reported, based on multivariate analysis, that anti-Ki/SL was significantly associated with male sex (p = 0.017), an observation, which is in line with the early work by Riboldi et al. [11], Cavazzana et al. [7] and Fredi et al. [14]. Although no systematic study has been conducted until today, it appears that anti-Ki/SL antibodies can be found in patients with a wide range of ethnicities [15].
When more sensitive ELISA methods, using purified native Ki/SL antigens, were used to analyze the clinical and serologic features of SLE, a higher prevalence of central nervous system involvement was noted [10]. Outside SLE and other CTD, anti-proteasome antibodies have been studied in psoriasis patients [16].

4. Case Reports and Longitudinal Analysis of anti-Ki/SL Antibodies

Several case reports have been published on patients exhibiting anti-Ki/SL antibodies [13,17,18,19,20], including a patient with fatal CTD overlap syndrome [13], a patient with SSc/dermatomyositis (DM) overlap syndrome, an individual with anti-centromere positive pulmonary-renal syndrome [18], a case with SLE with epileptic seizures and chorea during prednisolone treatment [16], an individual with SSc with interstitial pneumonia and various autoantibodies (improvement by intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy) [20] (Table 1). In addition to the studies measuring anti-Ki/SL antibodies during a single timepoint (mostly at diagnosis), one case report also provided longitudinal analysis. In this case of a female SLE patient, the titer of anti-Ki/SL antibody rose before the onset of pericarditis and pleuritis, suggesting that anti-Ki/SL titers might reflect disease activity [8]. Although case reports and case series do not allow us to draw strong conclusions about clinical utility, they provide valuable reference points for future studies.

5. Epitope Distribution on the Proteasome Complex and on Ki/SL

Ki/SL is part of the human proteasome macromolecular complex, which is a known target of several autoantibodies [2,21,22,23,24,25]. Studies aimed to identify the reactive epitope of autoantibodies on the Ki/SL antigen [26,27,28]. Using different methods, including recombinant protein fragments and synthetic peptides, multiple epitopes were mapped to different regions of the protein (see Figure 2) that were associated with distinctive immune responses and certain clinical subtypes [5,15]. Interestingly, a short peptide sequence (named KILT) was identified [26,28], which bound antibodies in 18/49 (36.7%) anti-Ki/SL positive serum samples. A preliminary analysis indicates that KILT exhibited different clinical associations when compared to the full-length protein, a finding that needs to be validated in larger cohorts. Similarly, patients with antibodies that react with both N- and C-terminal areas are reported to have higher prevalence of the Sicca syndrome [27].

6. Detection Methods for Anti-Ki/SL Antibodies

6.1. Indirect Immunofluorescence Pattern of Anti-Ki/SL Antibodies

The characteristic indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) staining pattern of anti-Ki/SL antibodies was reported to be diffuse speckled nuclear on HEp-2 cells, although some substrates showed nucleolar staining as well [29] (Figure 3). Interestingly, antibodies to PA28a showed cytoplasmic staining, which is consistent with the reported localization of the protein and also with the moderate (~40%) homology between Ki/SL and PA28a, as the cognate antibodies are apparently not cross-reactive [30]. More specifically, although 13/27 (48%) of anti-Ki/SL also reacted with PA28a, it is unlikely that this represents cross-reactivity. Until the present, only one study that investigated the reactivity of anti-PA28a and anti-Ki/SL in the same cohort of patients [30] found that the prevalence of the two autoantibodies was comparable. Anti-Ki/SL antibodies have not been addressed by the International Consensus of ANA Patterns (ICAP) [31]; however, the described pattern is similar to AC-04 and/or AC-05. Along those lines, it is of relevance that more and more sub-patterns are being added to the consensus list [32]. Interestingly, anti-Ki/SL antibodies frequently occur at high titers, both using IIF as well as solid-phase assays, such as ELISA (unpublished data).

6.2. Other Detection Methods for Anti-Ki/SL Antibodies

Historically, anti-Ki/SL antibodies were initially detected by double immunodiffusion (DID) and IP [5]. The first ELISA was based on a native Ki/SL antigen purified from rabbit thymus by ammonium sulfate precipitation and affinity chromatography, followed by high-pressure liquid chromatography gel filtration [10]. In total, 30 out of 140 (21.4%) patients with SLE had anti-Ki/SL antibody by ELISA, whereas 11 (7.9%) were positive by DID. In the early 1990s, when an ELISA system utilizing a recombinant human protein was used to test samples from 220 patients with various CTDs, anti-Ki/SL antibodies were detected in 18.9% of SLE sera [8]. Consequently, the method rather than the source of antigen (recombinant vs. native) affects the prevalence of the antibodies in disease cohorts.

7. Co-Expression of Anti-Ki/SL and Other Autoantibodies

Anti-Ki/SL antibodies have been associated with several other autoantibodies, including anti-Sm [5], anti-Ro [2], anti-Ku, as well as anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) [2,11] (Table 2). However, no clear consensus has been established, as some studies resulted in conflicting findings. As an example, a study by Fredi et al. [14] identified anti-Ki/SL antibodies in 31 patients, of which about one-half had no accompanying antibodies.

8. Future Directions

Future studies should re-evaluate the serological and clinical associations of anti-Ki/SL antibodies and also include experiments to shed more light on the potential associations with disease activity and treatment response in SLE patients. Along those lines, it is noteworthy that protease inhibitors have shown promise in treatment of refractory SLE [33,34]. Whether this is related to the proteasome levels or activity in serum or with the presence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies is a matter of future studies. Ideally, such investigations of the clinical phenotypes should be performed on inception cohorts of SLE patients, such as the SLICC cohort [35]. Lastly, with the intent to identify pre-clinical autoimmune conditions (e.g., early SLE), studies of cohorts, such as the US military, might provide valuable insights [36].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; methodology, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; software, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; validation, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F., M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F. and M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; formal analysis, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; investigation, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; resources, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; data curation, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; writing—review and editing, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; visualization, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; supervision, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; project administration, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F.; funding acquisition, M.M., M.S., C.B., M.-A.A. and M.J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank Carmen Andalucia (Werfen) for support with literature search.

Conflicts of Interest

Michael Mahler, Chelsea Bentow, are employees of Werfen, a diagnostic company. No stocks or shares. Marvin Fritzler is a consultant to Werfen and is Medical Director of Mitogen Diagnostics Corporation.

References

  1. Bernstein, R.M.; Bunn, C.C.; Hughes, G.R.; Francoeur, A.M.; Mathews, M.B. Cellular protein and RNA antigens in autoimmune disease. Mol. Biol. Med. 1984, 2, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Bernstein, R.M.; Morgan, S.H.; Bunn, C.C.; Gainey, R.C.; Hughes, G.R.; Mathews, M.B. The SL autoantibody-antigen system: Clinical and biochemical studies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1986, 45, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tojo, T.; Kaburaki, J.; Hayakawa, M.; Okamoto, T.; Tomii, M.; Homma, M. Precipitating antibody to a soluble nuclear antigen "Ki" with specificity for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ryumachi 1981, 21, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Harmon, C.; Peebles, C.; Tan, E.M. SL-a new precipitating system. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1981, 24, S122. [Google Scholar]
  5. Francoeur, A.M.; Peebles, C.L.; Gompper, P.T.; Tan, E.M. Identification of Ki (Ku, p70/p80) autoantigens and analysis of anti-Ki autoantibody reactivity. J. Immunol. 1986, 136, 1648–1653. [Google Scholar]
  6. Muro, Y.; Kano, T.; Sugiura, K.; Hagiwara, M. Low frequency of autoantibodies against Ki-67 antigen in Japanese patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. 1997, 10, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cavazzana, I.; Franceschini, F.; Vassalini, C.; Danieli, E.; Quinzanini, M.; Airo, P.; Cattaneo, R. Clinical and serological features of 35 patients with anti-Ki autoantibodies. Lupus 2005, 14, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yamanaka, K.; Takasaki, Y.; Nishida, Y.; Shimada, K.; Shibata, M.; Hashimoto, H. Detection and quantification of anti-Ki antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant Ki antigen. Arthritis Rheum. 1992, 35, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sherer, Y.; Gorstein, A.; Fritzler, M.J.; Shoenfeld, Y. Autoantibody explosion in systemic lupus erythematosus: More than 100 different antibodies found in SLE patients. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 34, 501–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sakamoto, M.; Takasaki, Y.; Yamanaka, K.; Kodama, A.; Hashimoto, H.; Hirose, S. Purification and characterization of Ki antigen and detection of anti-Ki antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1989, 32, 1554–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riboldi, P.; Asero, R.; Origgi, L.; Crespi, S. The SL/Ki system in connective tissue diseases: Incidence and clinical associations. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 1987, 5, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Matsunaga, K.; Yawata, M.; Tsuji, T.; Tani, K. HLA class II antigens associated with anti-Ki autoantibody positive connective tissue disease in Japanese. J. Rheumatol. 1998, 25, 1446–1447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Parodi, A.; Nigro, A.; Rebora, A. Anti-SL-Ki antibody in a patient with fatal connective tissue overlap disease. Br. J. Dermatol. 1989, 121, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fredi, M.; Cavazzana, I.; Quinzanini, M.; Taraborelli, M.; Cartella, S.; Tincani, A.; Franceschini, F. Rare autoantibodies to cellular antigens in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2014, 23, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boey, M.L.; Peebles, C.L.; Tsay, G.; Feng, P.H.; Tan, E.M. Clinical and autoantibody correlations in Orientals with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1988, 47, 918–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Colmegna, I.; Sainz, B., Jr.; Citera, G.; Maldonado-Cocco, J.A.; Garry, R.F.; Espinoza, L.R. Anti-20S proteasome antibodies in psoriatic arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 674–676. [Google Scholar]
  17. Miyachi, K.; Hankins, R.W.; Mimori, T.; Okano, Y.; Akizuki, M. Prospective study of a systemic sclerosis/dermatomyositis overlap patient presenting with anti-Ku and anti-Ki antibodies. Mod. Rheumatol. 2002, 12, 253–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oide, T.; Iwamura, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Aizawa, K.; Inoue, K.; Itoh, N.; Ikeda, S. Elderly-onset anticentromere antibody-positive pulmonary-renal syndrome: Report of an autopsy case. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 2001, 39, 498–503. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wakasugi, M.; Sato, T.; Maruyama, Y.; Ueno, M.; Arakawa, M. A case of systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed 7 years after epileptic seizure and developed chorea during prednisolone treatment. Ryumachi 1996, 36, 545–550. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ishiyama, K.; Suwa, A.; Ohta, S.; Moriguchi, M.; Suzuki, T.; Miyachi, K.; Hara, M.; Kashiwazaki, S. A case of systemic sclerosis associated with interstitial pneumonia with various autoantibodies: Improvement by intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi 1996, 19, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Feist, E.; Dorner, T.; Kuckelkorn, U.; Scheffler, S.; Burmester, G.; Kloetzel, P. Diagnostic importance of anti-proteasome antibodies. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2000, 123, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kordonouri, O.; Meyer, K.; Egerer, K.; Hartmann, R.; Scheffler, S.; Burmester, G.R.; Kuckelkorn, U.; Danne, T.; Feist, E. Prevalence of 20S proteasome, anti-nuclear and thyroid antibodies in young patients at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus and the risk of autoimmune thyroiditis. J. Pediatric Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 17, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brychcy, M.; Kuckelkorn, U.; Hausdorf, G.; Egerer, K.; Kloetzel, P.M.; Burmester, G.R.; Feist, E. Anti-20S proteasome autoantibodies inhibit proteasome stimulation by proteasome activator PA28. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2175–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feist, E.; Brychcy, M.; Hausdorf, G.; Hoyer, B.; Egerer, K.; Dorner, T.; Kuckelkorn, U.; Burmester, G.R. Anti-proteasome autoantibodies contribute to anti-nuclear antibody patterns on human larynx carcinoma cells. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Feist, E.; Burmester, G.R.; Kruger, E. The proteasome—victim or culprit in autoimmunity. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 172, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Takasaki, Y.; Yano, T.; Hirokawa, K.; Takeuchi, K.; Ando, S.; Takahashi, T.; Shimada, K.; Hashimoto, H. An epitope on Ki antigen recognized by autoantibodies from lupus patients shows homology with the SV40 large T antigen nuclear localization signal. Arthritis Rheum. 1996, 39, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matsudaira, R.; Takeuchi, K.; Takasaki, Y.; Yano, T.; Matsushita, M.; Hashimoto, H. Relationships between autoantibody responses to deletion mutants of Ki antigen and clinical manifestations of lupus. J. Rheumatol. 2003, 30, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yano, T.; Takasaki, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Hirokawa, K.; Yamanaka, K.; Hashimoto, H. Anti-Ki antibodies recognize an epitope homologous with SV40 nuclear localization signal: Clinical significance and reactivities in various immunoassays. Mod. Rheumatol. 2002, 12, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Matsushita, M.; Matsudaira, R.; Ikeda, K.; Nawata, M.; Tamura, N.; Takasaki, Y. Anti-proteasome activator 28alpha is a novel anti-cytoplasmic antibody in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjogren’s syndrome. Mod. Rheumatol. 2009, 19, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsushita, M.; Takasaki, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Yamada, H.; Matsudaira, R.; Hashimoto, H. Autoimmune response to proteasome activator 28alpha in patients with connective tissue diseases. J. Rheumatol. 2004, 31, 252–259. [Google Scholar]
  31. Damoiseaux, J.; von Muhlen, C.A.; Garcia-De La Torre, I.; Carballo, O.G.; de Melo, C.W.; Francescantonio, P.L.; Fritzler, M.J.; Herold, M.; Mimori, T.; Satoh, M.; et al. International consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP): The bumpy road towards a consensus on reporting ANA results. Autoimmun. Highlights 2016, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Röber, N.; Dellavance, A.; Ingénito, F.; Reimer, M.L.; Carballo, O.G.; Conrad, K.; Chan, E.K.L.; Andrade, L.E.C. Strong Association of the Myriad Discrete Speckled Nuclear Pattern With Anti-SS-A/Ro60 Antibodies: Consensus Experience of Four International Expert Centers. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 730102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Walhelm, T.; Gunnarsson, I.; Heijke, R.; Leonard, D.; Trysberg, E.; Eriksson, P.; Sjöwall, C. Clinical Experience of Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib Regarding Efficacy and Safety in Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nationwide Study. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 756941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Segarra, A.; Arredondo, K.V.; Jaramillo, J.; Jatem, E.; Salcedo, M.T.; Agraz, I.; Ramos, N.; Carnicer, C.; Valtierra, N.; Ostos, E. Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in refractory lupus nephritis: A single-center experience. Lupus 2020, 29, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Petri, M.; Orbai, A.M.; Alarcon, G.S.; Gordon, C.; Merrill, J.T.; Fortin, P.R.; Bruce, I.N.; Isenberg, D.; Wallace, D.J.; Nived, O.; et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 2677–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arbuckle, M.R.; McClain, M.T.; Rubertone, M.V.; Scofield, R.H.; Dennis, G.J.; James, J.A.; Harley, J.B. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jcm 11 03529 g001 550
Figure 1. Four historical decades of anti-Ki/SL antibodies. The history of anti-Ki/SL antibodies started with the discovery by Tojo and Harmon et al. in 1981, followed by several clinical association and epitope mapping studies. ELISA = enzyme linked immunoassay; HLA = Human Leukocyte Antigen; SL=sicca lupus.
Figure 1. Four historical decades of anti-Ki/SL antibodies. The history of anti-Ki/SL antibodies started with the discovery by Tojo and Harmon et al. in 1981, followed by several clinical association and epitope mapping studies. ELISA = enzyme linked immunoassay; HLA = Human Leukocyte Antigen; SL=sicca lupus.
Jcm 11 03529 g001
Jcm 11 03529 g002 550
Figure 2. Epitope distribution on the Ki/SL antigen. (a) shows a visual representation of the recombinant truncated fragments (and full-length) of the Ki/SL antigen and the corresponding reactivity study by Matsudaira et al. [27] (Panel (b)) Shows the fraction of patients reacting with the recombinant fragments.
Figure 2. Epitope distribution on the Ki/SL antigen. (a) shows a visual representation of the recombinant truncated fragments (and full-length) of the Ki/SL antigen and the corresponding reactivity study by Matsudaira et al. [27] (Panel (b)) Shows the fraction of patients reacting with the recombinant fragments.
Jcm 11 03529 g002
Jcm 11 03529 g003 550
Figure 3. Detection methods for anti-Ki/SL antibodies. (a). Indirect immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 slides showing a nuclear speckled pattern. (b). Immunoprecipitation pattern shows the immunoprecipitation (IP) bands associated with the presence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies.
Figure 3. Detection methods for anti-Ki/SL antibodies. (a). Indirect immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 slides showing a nuclear speckled pattern. (b). Immunoprecipitation pattern shows the immunoprecipitation (IP) bands associated with the presence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies.
Jcm 11 03529 g003
Table
Table 1. Overview of case studies including the measurement of anti-Ki/SL antibodies.
Table 1. Overview of case studies including the measurement of anti-Ki/SL antibodies.
Case StudyDiagnosisCommentsRef
Ishiyama 1996SSc/ILD-[20]
Wakasugi 1996SLE/epileptic seizure/chorea-[19]
Oide 2001Pulmonary-renal syndrome-[18]
Miyachi 2002SSc/DM overlapanti-Ku and anti-Ki/SL[17]
DM = dermatomyositis; ILD = interstitial lung disease; SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc = systemic sclerosis.
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies in different diseases.
Table 2. Prevalence of anti-Ki/SL antibodies in different diseases.
DiseaseTojo et al.
1981		Bernstein et al.
1986		Riboldi et al.
1987		Boey et al.
1988		Sakamoto et al.
1989		Yamanaka et al. 1992Fredi et al.
2014
MethodDIDCIECIEDIDELISAELISACIE
SLE30/255 (11.8%)20/300 (6.7%)27/217 (12.4%)8/94 (8.5%)30/140 (21.4%)21/111 (18.9%)31/540 (5.8%)
SjS 1/38 (2.6%) 2/25 (8.0%)
SS 2/60 (3.3%)
SSc0/90 (0.0%) 0/119 (0.0%) 3/25 (12.0%)2/30 (6.7%)
PM/DM0/29 (0.0%) 0/14 (0.0%) (0.0%)1/30 (3.3%)
RA0/33 (0.0%)2/70 (2.9%)0/37 (0.0%) (1.4%)2/50 (4.0%)
OS7/36 (19.4%)
PN0/6 (0.0%)
MCTD 1/50 (2.0%)3/21 (14.3%) 1/12 (8.3%)
HI 0/28 (0.0%) (0.0%)
PBC 1/135 (0.7%)
ITP 1/110 (0.9%)
VAS 2/11 (18.2%)
pRP 0/59 (0.0%)
Demographics
Male sex yes yes
Other associationsArthritis/pericarditis, SmWhite SLE, Ro(SS-A), PCNAPCNA CNS, Sm
Abbreviations: DM, dermatomyositis; HI, healthy individuals; ITP, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; OS, overlap syndrome; PBC, primary biliary cholangitis; PM, polymyositis; PN, periarteritis nodosa; SS, Sicca syndrome; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SjS, Sjögren’s syndrome; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahler, M.; Bentow, C.; Aure, M.-A.; Fritzler, M.J.; Satoh, M. Significance of Autoantibodies to Ki/SL as Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sicca Syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123529

AMA Style

Mahler M, Bentow C, Aure M-A, Fritzler MJ, Satoh M. Significance of Autoantibodies to Ki/SL as Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sicca Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(12):3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahler, Michael, Chelsea Bentow, Mary-Ann Aure, Marvin J. Fritzler, and Minoru Satoh. 2022. "Significance of Autoantibodies to Ki/SL as Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sicca Syndrome" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 12: 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123529

APA Style

Mahler, M., Bentow, C., Aure, M.-A., Fritzler, M. J., & Satoh, M. (2022). Significance of Autoantibodies to Ki/SL as Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sicca Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop