Next Article in Journal
Impact of HLA Mismatching on Early Subclinical Inflammation in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients
Previous Article in Journal
Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Non-Diabetic, Non-Obese Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/jcm10091933
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Associations between Serial Electrocardiography Measurements and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis

by
Hyun Jin Lee
1,†,
A Reum Choe
2,†,
HaeJu Lee
3,
Dong Ryeol Ryu
2,
Ea Wha Kang
4,
Jung Tak Park
5,
Su Hwan Lee
6,*,‡ and
Junbeom Park
7,*,‡
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 07985, Korea
3
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
4
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang 10444, Korea
5
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Institute of Kidney Disease Research, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
6
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
7
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 07985, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These two authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.
‡
These two authors contributed equally to this work as corresponding authors.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(9), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091933
Submission received: 22 March 2021 / Revised: 13 April 2021 / Accepted: 25 April 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) for hemodialysis (HD) patients is significantly higher than that observed in the general population and have the highest risk for arrhythmogenic death. In this multi-center study, patients starting hemodialysis in each hospital were enrolled; they underwent regular check-ups in an open-patient clinic. We examined serial electrocardiography (ECG) data in patients undergoing HD and determined their associations with the occurrence of SCD. Of 678 enrolled subjects who underwent serial ECG before and after hemodialysis, 291 died and 39 developed SCD. In all subjects, the QT peak-to-end (QTpe) interval at all leads and QRS duration were shortened after hemodialysis. The SCD group showed a significant change in the QTpe interval of the inferior, anterior, and lateral leads before and after hemodialysis compared with the survivor group (p < 0.001). In the pre-hemodialysis ECG, SCD patients had significantly longer QTpe intervals in all leads (p < 0.001) and a longer QRS duration (92.6 ± 14.0 vs. 100.6 ± 14.9 ms, p = 0.015) than survivors. In conclusion, patients with a longer QTpe interval before hemodialysis and large changes in ECG parameters after hemodialysis might be at a higher risk of SCD. Therefore, changes in the ECG before and after hemodialysis could help to predict SCD.

1. Introduction

According to the 2016 United States Renal Data System database, the most common cause of mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis is cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 41% of all deaths and 54% of deaths with known causes in this population [1]. Among CVD deaths, sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the largest cause of mortality in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) [2]. Although patients with ESRD undergoing HD constitute a relatively small population, SCD is significantly more common among them than in the general population, and ESRD is the strongest risk factor for arrhythmogenic death [3]. Several studies have identified risk factors for SCD in patients with ESRD undergoing HD, such as myocardial hypertrophy [4], left ventricular diastolic dysfunction [5], myocardial fibrosis [6], and dialysis-induced myocardial ischemia [7]. Furthermore, during HD, wide fluctuation of electrolytes such as sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium [8], and other ions may increase arrhythmia risk in the long term as well as during HD [9,10].
Therefore, if patients at a high risk of SCD could be identified, preventive management could be provided, including drug therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. However, invasive methods such as coronary angiography and treadmill stress tests are required to predict SCD risk in patients undergoing HD.
Among non-invasive methods, electrocardiography (ECG) reflects myocardial changes such as the prolongation of QT interval, QTc interval, QTc dispersion, and QT peak-to-end (QTpe) interval [11,12,13,14,15]. As mentioned in many previous reports, several risk factors of SCD cause ventricular remodeling and myocardial fibrosis, leading to ventricular dysfunction and dys-synchronization [5,6,7], changes which are known to affect SCD risk [11,12,13]. Notwithstanding this accumulating evidence, studies in large populations are still lacking, because of the low prevalence of ESRD [1,11]. In this study, we used a multi-center database to examine (1) the serial changes in ECG findings in patients undergoing HD and (2) how baseline ECG measurements and their changes are related to the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases and SCD.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This multi-center, retrospective cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ewha Womans University Mokdong hospital (2017-08-005) and conducted in three tertiary referral hospitals (Yonsei University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, and National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) in South Korea. This study enrolled patients who started HD in each hospital from November 1986 to September 2015. In addition, the last follow up date was 26 November 2016. The exclusion criteria were moderate to severe valvular heart diseases, congenital heart diseases, acute myocardial infarction/unstable angina within the past 3 months, and any uncontrolled metabolic disorders such as homocystinuria, glycogen storage diseases, and mitochondrial disorders. The rate of SCD and ECG measurements before and after HD were analyzed.

2.2. Data Collection

Data from all subjects were obtained through review of the hospital’s medical records. In case of missing medical records about the cause of death, telephone interviews were conducted. Clinical data such as those of demographic characteristics, start date of HD, presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, cause of death, and mortality were evaluated. Various laboratory data such as those of complete blood counts and blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolyte levels after HD were collected. All subjects underwent 12-lead ECG and 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before starting HD, which were repeated at regular intervals, together with laboratory tests, after starting HD. Furthermore, cardiac function, in terms of ejection fraction (EF), left ventricle end-diastolic dimension, left ventricle end-systolic dimension, and E/E’ ratio (E: mitral peak velocity of early filling, E’: early diastolic mitral annular velocity), was measured by TTE before and after HD.

2.3. Definitions

According to the 2006 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines, SCD is defined as the sudden cessation of cardiac activity regardless of whether resuscitation or spontaneous reversion occurs [16]. The most commonly used definition of SCD is “death occurring within an hour of symptom onset with no clinical support for another cause,” [17] and we used the same definition in our study.
Cause of death was defined as the event which directly led to death and was divided into the following six mutually exclusive categories: (1) cardiovascular disease (including SCD), (2) intracerebral hemorrhage, (3) major bleeding, (4) cancer, (5) sepsis/other infection, or (6) other. Among them, major bleeding was defined as (1) fatal bleeding; (2) symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular, pericardial, or intramuscular bleeding with compartment syndrome; and/or (3) bleeding causing a decrease in the hemoglobin level of ≥2 g/dL or leading to the requirement of transfusion. When the cause of death did not belong to the first five categories, deaths were classified as deaths due to “other” causes.
HD duration was defined as the difference between the first HD date and the last follow up date of HD patient.
The factors that may affect SCD are hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation (AF). Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg [18]. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting blood glucose levels ≥126 mg/dL (fasting: no caloric intake for at least 8 h), hemoglobin A1c levels ≥6.5%, or a previous diagnosis [19]. AF was defined as a documented supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with uncoordinated atrial activation and consequently, ineffective atrial contraction [20].

2.4. ECG Analysis

ECG was performed for all participants using an ECG HP-Page-Writer TC 30 machine (filter range 0.5–150 Hz, AC filter 60 Hz, 25 mm/s, 10 mm/mV). We measured the PR interval, which extends from the beginning of the P wave until the beginning of the QRS complex. QRS duration was defined as the time from the first downward deflection after the P wave to the second downward deflection after the R wave. The QT interval was measured from the onset of the QRS complex to end of the T wave that returned to the TP baseline. Every QT interval was corrected for the patient heart rate using Bazett’s formula: QTc = QT√RR (in milliseconds [ms]) [20]. The QTpe interval of each lead was measured from the maximum amplitude of the T wave to the end of the T wave that meets the isoelectric line [20]. QTc dispersion was defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum QTc intervals in 12 leads [20]. The initial ECG was performed when the patient was about to start HD, and the last ECG performed before cardiac death or the end of follow-up in HD patients was considered as the final ECG. All ECG changes were calculated as “ECG parameter before HD” minus “ECG parameter after HD,” and median values were used for analysis. ECG measurements were performed manually with the aid of software (Cardio Calipers, version 3.3, Iconico, Inc., New York, NY, USA) by two researchers blinded to patient information.

2.5. Patient Follow-Up

Patients underwent regular check-ups at least twice a week in an open-patient clinic. At each visit, the medical history of the patient was recorded, physical and laboratory examinations were performed, including examinations for infection, drug history, and electrolyte disturbance. We performed ECG at least once in 3 months.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are reported as means ± standard deviations and were compared using t-tests. Categorical variables are reported as numbers and percentages and were compared between groups using χ2 tests and Fisher’s exact tests. ECG changes before and after HD were compared between groups using a linear mixed model (LMM). SCD risk is presented as a hazard ratio (HR), calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. The cut-off values of the QTpe intervals in each lead used in Cox analysis were established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. For additional analyses, propensity score matching was used to reduce the effects of age and sex. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software, version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA); p-values <0.05 were considered significant. Propensity score matching was performed using the R program, version 3.5.3 for Windows.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

During the study period (mean follow-up duration 63.6 ± 53 months), a total of 678 subjects who underwent serial ECG before and after HD were enrolled and followed-up, among whom 291 died. Infection (n = 128, 44%) was the leading cause of death, followed by cardiovascular diseases (n = 71, 24.4%), cancer (n = 33, 11.3%), intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 26, 8.9%), major bleeding (n = 13, 4.5%), and others (n = 20, 6.9%). Among deaths from cardiovascular diseases, 39 (54.9%) involved SCD (Figure 1A).
Considering survivors and subjects with SCD, the prevalence of SCD was 9−13.6% according to the HD period (Figure 1B). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the subjects, excluding those who died of causes other than SCD (survivors without SCD, n = 387; those who died due to SCD, n = 39). No significant differences between these two groups were found in sex, body surface area, body mass index, presence of hypertension, mean HD duration, or mean sodium, potassium, or calcium levels measured after HD. However, age (69.2 ± 12.5 vs. 59.8 ± 13.7 years, p < 0.001) and the proportion of subjects with diabetes mellitus (78.9% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the SCD group. Regarding TTE findings, the EF was significantly lower in the SCD group than in the survivor group both before and after HD (pre-HD TTE: 54.8 ± 12.4 vs. 59.4 ± 11.3, p = 0.037; post-HD TTE: 46 ± 11.8 vs. 58.4 ± 11.6, p < 0.001), while the E/E′ ratio was significantly higher in the SCD group than in the survivor group (pre-HD TTE: 19.4 ± 7.7 vs. 15.6 ± 6.6, p = 0.011; post-HD TTE: 22.9 ± 9.4 vs. 17.2 ± 7.9, p = 0.018). Other parameters, such as left ventricle end-diastolic dimension and left ventricle end-systolic dimension, showed no significant differences.

3.2. ECG Findings in the SCD Group

Table 2 and Table 3 show the analysis of ECG findings before and after HD. In the pre-HD ECG analysis, SCD patients had a significantly longer QTpe interval at all leads (II, III, aVF, and V1-6 leads, p < 0.001) and a longer QRS duration than survivors (100.6 ± 14.9 vs. 92.6 ± 14.0 ms, p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with AF was significantly higher in the SCD group (11.1% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.028). Other variables including heart rate, PR interval, QT interval, QTc interval, and dispersion of QT did not show significant differences between the two groups. However, interestingly, in the post-HD ECG analysis, there were no significant differences in any of the variables (QTpe intervals at all leads, QRS duration, or proportion of patients with AF) that had shown differences in the pre-HD ECG analysis. Only heart rate was significantly higher in the SCD group (89.8 ± 22.3 vs. 81.9 ± 15.6 beats/min, p = 0.037).

3.3. Changes in ECG Parameters before and after HD in the Two Groups

Table 4 and Figure 2 show the median change in each ECG parameter after HD in the two groups. There were no significant differences the changes in QT interval, QTc interval, or dispersion of QT between the two groups. However, the change in QTpe interval after HD was significantly greater in the SCD group than in survivors. Furthermore, in the LMM analysis, the SCD group showed a significantly larger change in the QTpe intervals of the inferior, anterior, and lateral leads after HD than the survivor group (Figure 2, Supplementary Figure S1; all leads, p < 0.001).

3.4. ECG Parameters as Predictors of SCD

ROC curve analysis showed the ability of the pre-HD QTpe interval (at all leads) to predict SCD (Supplementary Table S1). In particular, the area under the curve of the QTpe interval at the V2 lead was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.741–0.919). The optimal cut-off value of 148.1 ms for the QTpe interval at the V2 lead was determined using ROC curve analysis. Indeed, in multivariable Cox regression analysis, a QTpe interval at the V2 lead >148.1 ms was significantly associated with SCD after adjusting factors including age, sex, diabetes mellitus, AF and EF before HD (HR: 33.793, CI: 4.446–256.845) (Table 5).

3.5. Additional Analyses

Since there was a significant difference in age between survivors and SCD patients, additional analyses were performed using propensity score matching to reduce the effects of age and sex (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). After age- and sex-matching, SCD patients showed a significantly longer pre-HD QTpe interval at all leads (II, III, aVF, and V1-6 leads, p < 0.001) than survivors (Supplementary Table S3).
Moreover, in an additional analysis based on cardiovascular mortality including SCD, acute coronary diseases, and heart failure, 378 survivors and 71 patients who died of CVD were compared. Detailed results are described in the Supplementary Tables S5–S8. Similar to the SCD analysis, the additional CVD analysis showed that a longer pre-HD QTpe interval was an important predictor of CVD mortality. Moreover, the changes in some ECG parameters after HD were also significantly greater in the CVD mortality group than in the survivor group (QTpe intervals at the II-V6 leads, p < 0.001, Supplementary Figure S2). The QTc interval was significantly prolonged after HD in the CVD mortality group compared to that in the survivor group (466.9 ± 33.7 vs. 451.8 ± 28.8 ms, p = 0.001).
Lastly, to determine whether there was a difference according to the duration of the HD, we studied additional analysis. Both patients who received HD less than 1 year and those who received HD older than 1 year showed similar results to analysis which were conducted with all patients (Supplementary Tables S9–S12).

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that SCD developed in 9−13.6% of HD patients, and these patients showed a significantly longer QTpe interval and QRS duration at all leads before HD initiation. Moreover, ECG changes after HD were significantly greater in the SCD group than in the survivor group.

4.1. Clinical Implications of the QTpe Interval in This Study and Previous Studies

SCD in ESRD is a major cause of mortality, and previous studies have reported various risk factors including age, poor nutrition, decreased heart function, and inflammation [2,21]. Among ECG parameters, increased QTpe interval is known to be associated with sudden cardiac death [22]. Our study showed a significantly longer QTpe interval on the pre-HD ECG in the SCD group, similar to this previous study. However, the QTpe interval was shortened after HD in our study. The peak of the T wave represents the end of the repolarization of epicardial cells, while its end represents the end of the repolarization of endocardial cells. Therefore, the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave is closely related to the global transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) in the ventricular myocardium [23]. A prolonged QTpe interval may induce an extended vulnerable period and given the right conditions, could increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmogenesis [24]. Moreover, various studies have reported that QTpe interval prolongation is correlated with arrhythmic instability and can be an index of ventricular repolarization [24,25,26,27]. Thus, the QTpe interval predicts ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and death, as its increase has been correlated with the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and mortality [28]. Considered the aforementioned results, a longer QTpe interval could be considered a risk factor for SCD.

4.2. Comparison with Other Studies: An Explanatory Hypothesis

In our study, the QTpe interval after HD in both groups was close to normal [29], with no differences between the two groups. Our hypothesis to explain these findings is as follows. Chronic kidney disease frequently causes cardiac remodeling with hypertrophy, capillary loss, and fibrosis [30]. Progression of myocardial fibrosis could lead to increased dispersion of repolarization and an increased QTpe interval on ECG [31]. In other words, patients with longer QTpe intervals are more likely to have undergone cardiac remodeling. HD ameliorates the factors causing cardiac remodeling, including volume overload, removes uremic toxins, and corrects electrolyte imbalance [30,32], and this might shorten the QTpe interval. A recent study reported no differences in QTpe intervals between the SCD and survivor groups among HD patients, similar to our results [33]. Another possibility is that a greater change in TDR due to HD resulted in vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmogenesis in a situation involving cardiac remodeling caused by chronic kidney disease. HD patients are always exposed to rapid changes in blood pressure, volume, and electrical conductance of the myocardium when receiving HD. A prolonged QTpe interval before HD suggests a cardiac structural defect, and a defective structure may be more strongly affected by rapid hemodynamic changes. Indeed, in our study, the SCD group showed decreased EF and increased E/E’ on TTE both before and after HD.

4.3. Clinical Implications of the QTc Interval and QT Dispersion in This Study and Previous Studies

Several studies have reported an increased QTc interval and increased QT dispersion on ECG in various populations, including ESRD patients, as risk factors for SCD [12,13,34]. However, in our study, the QTc interval was not prolonged compared to its normal value before or after HD [35]. QT dispersion, as in other studies, was >50 ms both before and after HD; hence, it was higher than normal [14,15] but was not different between the SCD and survivor groups. It may be conjectured that previous studies focused on cardiovascular mortality rather than SCD, potentially explaining the difference with our results. In our additional analysis of cardiovascular mortality, the pre-HD QTc interval and QT dispersion were significantly different between the survivor and cardiovascular mortality groups (Supplementary Table S7). Although various studies have reported that the QTc interval and QT dispersion are associated with cardiovascular mortality in ESRD patients, a clear association between QT dispersion and SCD in the ESRD population has not yet been observed [11].

4.4. Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, although we enrolled a large sample of patients from three tertiary hospitals, our study population was entirely Asian. Therefore, our findings may not be generalizable to other ethnicities. Second, our study design was retrospective, and some patients’ mortality data were acquired via telephone interviews, which might have led to some bias. However, most ESRD patients with HD underwent regular check-ups at the open-patient clinic, suggesting that any bias would likely be small. Furthermore, we performed additional analyses to reduce the effects of age and sex using propensity score matching. However, some data including vascular access and all serial ECG for each patient was not collected. Further, since enrolled patients were extracted from the registry, some patients might not be included. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the interpretation of the results. Third, we could not confirm our hypothesis about myocardial fibrosis in ESRD patients with HD presented in the Discussion. Fibrosis of the myocardium could be confirmed using biomarkers (tumor necrosis factor alpha, matrix metalloproteinase-2, and cytokines) or through magnetic resonance imaging. Lastly we only compared the initial ECG before start HD with the last ECG performed before cardiac death or the end of follow-up in HD patients. Therefore, we could not find ECG parameters change over time the longer patients stayed on HD in this study. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm and improve on our results.

5. Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that ECG parameters before and after HD may help in predicting SCD in ESRD patients. The QTpe interval at all leads and QRS duration were shortened after HD. Patients with a longer QTpe interval before HD and large ECG changes after HD might have a relatively higher SCD risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10091933/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of ECG changes before and after HD in survivors and SCD patients using a linear mixing model, Figure S2: Comparison of ECG changes before and after HD in survivors and CVD death patients using a linear mixing model, Table S1: ROC analysis of the pre-HD QT peak-end interval at all leads as predictors of SCD, Table S2: Baseline characteristics of survivors and SCD patients after propensity score matching for age and sex, Table S3: Pre-hemodialysis ECG findings after propensity score matching for age and sex, Table S4: Post-hemodialysis ECG findings after propensity score matching for age and sex, Table S5: Baseline characteristics of survivors and cardiovascular disease patients, Table S6: Pre-hemodialysis ECG findings of survivors and cardiovascular disease patients, Table S7: Post-hemodialysis ECG findings of survivors and cardiovascular disease patients, Table S8: Changes in ECG parameters after HD (ECG before HD-ECG after HD), Table S9: Baseline characteristics of the patients who older than 12 months after HD, Table S10: Pre-hemodialysis ECG findings of the patients who older than 12 months after HD, Table S11: Post-hemodialysis ECG findings of the patients who older than 12 months after HD, Table S12: Changes in ECG parameters after HD (ECG before HD-ECG after HD) in patients who older than 12 months after HD.

Author Contributions

S.H.L. and J.P. take full responsibility for the content of this manuscript, including its data and analysis; S.H.L. and J.P. made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study; H.J.L., A.R.C., H.L., D.R.R., E.W.K., J.T.P., S.H.L. and J.P. made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of data; H.J.L., A.R.C., J.P and S.H.L. drafted the initial manuscript. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 202011B26, Su Hwan Lee). And this research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2017R1E1A1A01078382, Junbeom Park).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ewha Womans University Mokdong hospital (2017-08-005).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the study’s retrospective nature.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to our IRB policy but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saran, R.; Robinson, B.; Abbott, K.C.; Agodoa, L.Y.; Albertus, P.; Ayanian, J.; Balkrishnan, R.; Bragg-Gresham, J.; Cao, J.; Chen, J.L.; et al. Us renal data system 2016 annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the united states. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 69, A7–A8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Makar, M.S.; Pun, P.H. Sudden cardiac death among hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 69, 684–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tonelli, M.; Wiebe, N.; Culleton, B.; House, A.; Rabbat, C.; Fok, M.; McAlister, F.; Garg, A.X. Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: A systematic review. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 2034–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, E.D.; Parekh, R.S. Calcium and sudden cardiac death in end-stage renal disease. Semin. Dial. 2015, 28, 624–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burton, J.O.; Jefferies, H.J.; Selby, N.M.; McIntyre, C.W. Hemodialysis-induced repetitive myocardial injury results in global and segmental reduction in systolic cardiac function. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 4, 1925–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Guérin, A.P.; London, G.M.; Marchais, S.J.; Metivier, F. Arterial stiffening and vascular calcifications in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015, 15, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. McIntyre, C.W.; Burton, J.O.; Selby, N.M.; Leccisotti, L.; Korsheed, S.; Baker, C.S.; Camici, P.G. Hemodialysis-induced cardiac dysfunction is associated with an acute reduction in global and segmental myocardial blood flow. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 3, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Foley, R.N.; Parfrey, P.S.; Harnett, J.D.; Kent, G.M.; Hu, L.; O’Dea, R.; Murray, D.C.; Barre, P.E. Hypocalcemia, morbidity, and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Am. J. Nephrol. 1996, 16, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pun, P.H.; Middleton, J.P. Sudden cardiac death in hemodialysis patients: A comprehensive care approach to reduce risk. Blood Purif. 2012, 33, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alpert, M.A. Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death on dialysis: Epidemiology, evaluation, treatment, and prevention. Hemodial. Int. 2011, 15, S22–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Waks, J.W.; Tereshchenko, L.G.; Parekh, R.S. Electrocardiographic predictors of mortality and sudden cardiac death in patients with end stage renal disease on hemodialysis. J. Electrocardiol. 2016, 49, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, V.C.; Lin, L.Y.; Wu, K.D. Qt interval dispersion in dialysis patients. Nephrology 2005, 10, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beaubien, E.R.; Pylypchuk, G.B.; Akhtar, J.; Biem, H.J. Value of corrected qt interval dispersion in identifying patients initiating dialysis at increased risk of total and cardiovascular mortality. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002, 39, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sahu, P.; Lim, P.O.; Rana, B.S.; Struthers, A.D. Qt dispersion in medicine: Electrophysiological holy grail or fool’s gold? QJM Int. J. Med. 2000, 93, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Morris, S.T.; Galiatsou, E.; Stewart, G.A.; Rodger, R.S.; Jardine, A.G. Qt dispersion before and after hemodialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999, 10, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data; Buxton, A.E.; Calkins, H.; Callans, D.J.; DiMarco, J.P.; Fisher, J.D.; Greene, H.L.; Haines, D.E.; Hayes, D.L.; Heidenreich, P.A.; et al. Acc/aha/hrs 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical data standards (acc/aha/hrs writing committee to develop data standards on electrophysiology). Circulation 2006, 114, 2534–2570. [Google Scholar]
  17. Siscovick, D.S. Challenges in cardiac arrest research: Data collection to assess outcomes. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1993, 22, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Agabiti Rosei, E.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. esc/esh guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3021–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016 abridged for primary care providers. Am. Diabetes Assoc. 2016, 34, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Page, R.L.; Joglar, J.A.; Caldwell, M.A.; Calkins, H.; Conti, J.B.; Deal, B.J.; Estes, N.A.M., 3rd; Field, M.E.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Hammill, S.C.; et al. 2015 acc/aha/hrs guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, e27–e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Whitman, I.R.; Feldman, H.I.; Deo, R. Ckd and sudden cardiac death: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 23, 1929–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Panikkath, R.; Reinier, K.; Uy-Evanado, A.; Teodorescu, C.; Hattenhauer, J.; Mariani, R.; Gunson, K.; Jui, J.; Chugh, S.S. Prolonged tpeak-to-tend interval on the resting ecg is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2011, 4, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Gupta, P.; Patel, C.; Patel, H.; Narayanaswamy, S.; Malhotra, B.; Green, J.T.; Yan, G.X. T(p-e)/qt ratio as an index of arrhythmogenesis. J. Electrocardiol. 2008, 41, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Watanabe, N.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tanno, K.; Miyoshi, F.; Asano, T.; Kawamura, M.; Mikami, Y.; Adachi, T.; Ryu, S.; Miyata, A.; et al. Transmural dispersion of repolarization and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J. Electrocardiol. 2004, 37, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lubinski, A.; Kornacewicz-Jach, Z.; Wnuk-Wojnar, A.M.; Adamus, J.; Kempa, M.; Królak, T.; Lewicka-Nowak, E.; Radomski, M.; Swiatecka, G. The terminal portion of the t wave: A new electrocardiographic marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2000, 23, 1957–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castro Hevia, J.; Antzelevitch, C.; Tornés Bárzaga, F.; Dorantes Sánchez, M.; Dorticós Balea, F.; Zayas Molina, R.; Quiñones Pérez, M.A.; Fayad Rodríguez, Y. Tpeak-tend and tpeak-tend dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the brugada syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 1828–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Letsas, K.P.; Weber, R.; Astheimer, K.; Kalusche, D.; Arentz, T. Tpeak-tend interval and tpeak-tend/qt ratio as markers of ventricular tachycardia inducibility in subjects with brugada ecg phenotype. EP Eur. 2010, 12, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosenthal, T.M.; Stahls, P.F., 3rd; Abi Samra, F.M.; Bernard, M.L.; Khatib, S.; Polin, G.M.; Xue, J.Q.; Morin, D.P. T-peak to t-end interval for prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and mortality in a primary prevention population with systolic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2015, 12, 1789–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rautaharju, P.M.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Gregg, R.E.; Haisty, W.K.; Vitolins, M.Z.; Curtis, A.B.; Warren, J.; Horaĉek, M.B.; Zhou, S.H.; Soliman, E.Z. Normal standards for computer-ecg programs for prognostically and diagnostically important ecg variables derived from a large ethnically diverse female cohort: The women’s health initiative (whi). J. Electrocardiol. 2013, 46, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kaesler, N.; Babler, A.; Floege, J.; Kramann, R. Cardiac remodeling in chronic kidney disease. Toxins 2020, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Morin, D.P.; Saad, M.N.; Shams, O.F.; Owen, J.S.; Xue, J.Q.; Abi-Samra, F.M.; Khatib, S.; Nelson-Twakor, O.S.; Milani, R.V. Relationships between the t-peak to t-end interval, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and death in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. EP Eur. 2012, 14, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hassan, M.O.; Duarte, R.; Dix-Peek, T.; Vachiat, A.; Naidoo, S.; Dickens, C.; Grinter, S.; Manga, P.; Naicker, S. Correlation between volume overload, chronic inflammation, and left ventricular dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin. Nephrol. 2016, 86, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saour, B.M.; Wang, J.H.; Lavelle, M.P.; Mathew, R.O.; Sidhu, M.S.; Boden, W.E.; Sacco, J.D.; Costanzo, E.J.; Hossain, M.A.; Vachharanji, T.; et al. Tpte and tpte/qt: Novel markers to predict sudden cardiac death in esrd? Braz. J. Nephrol. 2019, 41, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Straus, S.M.; Kors, J.A.; De Bruin, M.L.; van der Hooft, C.S.; Hofman, A.; Heeringa, J.; Deckers, J.W.; Kingma, J.H.; Sturkenboom, M.C.; Stricker, B.H.; et al. Prolonged qtc interval and risk of sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. QT interval and drug therapy. BMJ 2016, 353, i2732. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 10 01933 g001 550
Figure 1. Cause of death and proportion of sudden cardiac death in end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) patients. (A) Cause of death in ESRD patients. (B) Proportion of sudden cardiac death in ESRD patients.
Figure 1. Cause of death and proportion of sudden cardiac death in end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) patients. (A) Cause of death in ESRD patients. (B) Proportion of sudden cardiac death in ESRD patients.
Jcm 10 01933 g001
Jcm 10 01933 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of electrocardiography (ECG) change before and after hemodialysis (HD) using a linear mixed model. The change in QT peak-to-end (QTpe) interval before and after HD in the sudden cardiac death (SCD) group and the change in QTpe interval before and after HD in the survivor group were statistically significant. The SCD group showed a significantly larger change in the QTpe intervals of the inferior, anterior, and lateral leads after HD than the survivor group.
Figure 2. Comparison of electrocardiography (ECG) change before and after hemodialysis (HD) using a linear mixed model. The change in QT peak-to-end (QTpe) interval before and after HD in the sudden cardiac death (SCD) group and the change in QTpe interval before and after HD in the survivor group were statistically significant. The SCD group showed a significantly larger change in the QTpe intervals of the inferior, anterior, and lateral leads after HD than the survivor group.
Jcm 10 01933 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients.
VariableSurvivor (n = 387)SCD (n = 39)p-Value
Age (years)59.8 ± 13.769.2 ± 12.5<0.001
Male (n, %)189 (48.8)25 (64.1)0.069
Body surface area (m2)1.64 ± 0.191.66 ± 0.220.571
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.0 ± 3.722.8 ± 3.90.78
Hypertension (n, %)349 (90.2)33 (84.6)0.387
Diabetes mellitus (n, %)206 (53.2)30 (76.9)0.003
Duration of HD (months)64.5 ± 53.054.9 ± 52.80.294
Echocardiography before HD
Pre-HD LVEF (%)59.4 ± 11.354.8 ± 12.40.037
Pre-HD LVEDD (mm)51.9 ± 6.653.9 ± 10.10.367
Pre-HD LVESD (mm)35.5 ± 7.338.1 ± 11.20.329
Pre-HD E/E′15.6 ± 6.619.4 ± 7.70.011
Echocardiography after HD
Post-HD- HD LVEF (%)58.4 ± 11.646 ± 11.8<0.001
Post-HD LVEDD (mm)51.2 ± 6.052.7 ± 10.50.493
Post-HD LVESD (mm)35.3 ± 7.139.9 ± 10.70.051
Post-HD E/E′ 17.2 ± 7.922.9 ± 9.40.018
Laboratory findings after HD
Hb (g/dL)10.5 ± 1.49.3 ± 1.5<0.001
Hct (%)32.6 ± 7.828.2 ± 4.80.017
BUN (mg/dL)54.8 ± 21.958.5 ± 30.70.611
Cr (mg/dL)8.4 ± 3.26.8 ± 3.70.039
eGFR (EPI)6.5 ± 5.610.0 ± 8.40.091
Sodium (mEq/L)137 ± 9.8137.6 ± 5.40.764
Potassium (mEq/L)4.9 ± 0.84.8 ± 1.30.642
T.Calcium (mg/dL)8.9 ± 1.08.6 ± 0.70.352
Values are expressed as n (%) or means (standard deviations) unless otherwise indicated; SCD, sudden cardiac death; HD, hemodialysis; LV, left ventricle; EF, ejected fraction; LVEDD, left ventricle end-diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricle end-systolic dimension; E/E′, E: mitral peak velocity of early filling, E′: early diastolic mitral annular velocity; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; T.Calcium, Total calcium.
Table
Table 2. Baseline ECG findings before hemodialysis.
Table 2. Baseline ECG findings before hemodialysis.
VariableSurvivor (n = 387)SCD (n = 39)p-Value
Atrial fibrillation (n, %)5 (1.3)3 (7.7)0.028
Heart rate (/min)76.2 ± 14.680.6 ± 16.70.141
PR interval (ms)168.9 ± 27.6175.2 ± 37.90.377
QRS duration (ms)92.6 ± 14.0100.6 ± 14.90.015
QT interval (ms)405.5 ± 47.9395.6 ± 49.00.307
QTc interval (ms)451.8 ± 28.8456.2 ± 29.90.449
Dispersion of QT (ms)55.5 ± 32.467.9 ± 22.70.052
QT Peak-end interval (ms)
II113.4 ± 50.0183.9 ± 67.4<0.001
III110.0 ± 69.2174.8 ± 72.3<0.001
aVF108.4 ± 48.4178.4 ± 70.8<0.001
V1112.0 ± 49.6192.5 ± 70.5<0.001
V2123.9 ± 51.5206.8 ± 67.7<0.001
V3126.3 ± 53.3209.7 ± 75.9<0.001
V4122.2 ± 54.5201.8 ± 71.8<0.001
V5121.1 ± 53.6202.1 ± 76.7<0.001
V6118.5 ± 54.4200.3 ± 80.8<0.001
Values are expressed as n (%) or means (standard deviations) unless otherwise indicated; SCD, sudden cardiac death; ECG, electrocardiography.
Table
Table 3. Baseline ECG findings after hemodialysis.
Table 3. Baseline ECG findings after hemodialysis.
VariableSurvivor (n = 387)SCD (n = 39)p-Value
Atrial fibrillation (n, %)12 (3.1)3 (7.7)0.138
Heart rate (/min)81.9 ± 15.689.8 ± 22.30.037
PR interval (ms)171.2 ± 31.8151.0 ± 44.60.106
QRS duration (ms)95.2 ± 26.1105.6 ± 33.00.099
QT interval (ms)409.0 ± 51.4396.9 ± 62.70.279
QTc interval (ms)459.6 ± 46.8464.1 ± 47.30.601
Dispersion of QT (ms)52.0 ± 2166.6 ± 43.80.075
QT Peak-end interval (ms)
II89.1 ± 37.083.3 ± 37.10.419
III84.2 ± 52.581.5 ± 35.30.781
aVF83.3 ± 20.378.4 ± 31.90.413
V188.3 ± 22.992.0 ± 22.00.407
V2102.1 ± 50.590.4 ± 21.40.232
V3102.0 ± 20.094.2 ± 24.80.096
V498.4 ± 26.893.7 ± 28.30.382
V593.5 ± 21.986.0 ± 22.20.079
V690.0 ± 20.591.3 ± 25.80.802
Values are expressed as n (%) or means (standard deviations) unless otherwise indicated; SCD, sudden cardiac death; ECG, electrocardiography.
Table
Table 4. Changes in ECG parameters after HD (ECG before HD-ECG after HD).
Table 4. Changes in ECG parameters after HD (ECG before HD-ECG after HD).
VariableSurvivor (n = 387)SCD (n = 39)p-Value
QT interval (ms)−6 (−36, 26)38 (−25, 84)0.963
QTc interval (ms)−8.5 (−32, 12)1 (−13.5, 58)0.937
Dispersion of QT (ms)4.3 (−13.9, 27.8)32 (1, 48)0.02
QT Peak-end interval (ms)
II8 (−9.4, −71.2)112 (82, 128)<0.001
III12 (−8, 69.4)96 (66, 140)<0.001
aVF12 (−8, 61.8)132 (96, 142)<0.001
V18 (−12, 64.4)140 (98.0−150)<0.001
V212 (−8, 63)140 (94, 168)<0.001
V38.7 (−8, 70.2)152 (114, 186)<0.001
V48 (−10, 64.7)140 (80, 164)<0.001
V512 (−9.2, 96.6)160 (142, 176)<0.001
V612 (−4.2, 66.2)152 (90, 174)<0.001
Values are expressed as medians (interquartile range); ECG, electrocardiography; HD, hemodialysis; SCD, sudden cardiac death.
Table
Table 5. Cox analysis of the risk of sudden cardiac death predicted by ECG parameters.
Table 5. Cox analysis of the risk of sudden cardiac death predicted by ECG parameters.
Hazard Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-Value
Age1.0511.005–1.1000.030
Sex, male1.8460.623–5.4700.269
Diabetes mellitus3.2760.719–14.9360.125
Atrial fibrillation before hemodialysis8.0611.886–34.4490.005
Ejection fraction in echocardiography before hemodialysis0.9750.934–1.0190.259
QTpe interval at the V2 lead > 148.1 ms before hemodialysis33.7934.446–256.8450.001
QTpe: QT peak-to-end.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.J.; Choe, A.R.; Lee, H.; Ryu, D.R.; Kang, E.W.; Park, J.T.; Lee, S.H.; Park, J. Clinical Associations between Serial Electrocardiography Measurements and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091933

AMA Style

Lee HJ, Choe AR, Lee H, Ryu DR, Kang EW, Park JT, Lee SH, Park J. Clinical Associations between Serial Electrocardiography Measurements and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(9):1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hyun Jin, A Reum Choe, HaeJu Lee, Dong Ryeol Ryu, Ea Wha Kang, Jung Tak Park, Su Hwan Lee, and Junbeom Park. 2021. "Clinical Associations between Serial Electrocardiography Measurements and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 9: 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091933

APA Style

Lee, H. J., Choe, A. R., Lee, H., Ryu, D. R., Kang, E. W., Park, J. T., Lee, S. H., & Park, J. (2021). Clinical Associations between Serial Electrocardiography Measurements and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(9), 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop