Fatty Liver Is Associated with Low N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Healthy Population
by
, ,
Hyo-In Choi
1
,
Mi Yeon Lee
2,
Byeong Kil Oh
1,
Seung Jae Lee
1,
Jeong Gyu Kang
3,
Sung Ho Lee
1,
Jong-Young Lee
1,
Byung Jin Kim
1,
Bum Soo Kim
1,
Jin Ho Kang
1 and
Ki-Chul Sung
1,* 1
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
2
Division of Biostatistics, Department of R&D Management, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
3
Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(7), 1402; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071402
Submission received: 3 March 2021
/
Revised: 26 March 2021
/
Accepted: 28 March 2021
/
Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Abstract
:Fatty liver (FL), insulin resistance (IR) and obesity often coexist, but data on the independent impacts of these factors on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are scarce. We examined the impact of FL, IR and obesity on NT-proBNP levels using a large set of cross-sectional data. The associations of FL, IR and obesity with NT-proBNP were analyzed in 39,923 healthy adult participants. IR was estimated using a homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index. A multivariable regression model was conducted to identify associations between NT-proBNP and FL on abdominal ultrasound. FL, IR and obesity showed independent inverse associations with NT-proBNP after multiple adjustments for baseline characteristics. In a multivariable regression model adjusting for IR and obesity, FL was independently associated with lower levels of NT-proBNP (estimates, Exp(β) 0.864, 0.849–0.880). The combination of FL and IR was a powerful dual indicator, lowering NT-proBNP levels approximately 25% in the generally healthy study population. In conclusion, FL was independently associated with lower NT-proBNP levels. FL and a high HOMA-IR index are a powerful indicator combination for lower NT-proBNP levels. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the association between FL and NT-proBNP.
1. Introduction
Levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) help to distinguish cardiac causes of dyspnea, and are also useful in the prediction of prognosis and monitoring the treatment efficacy in patients with heart failure [1]. In particular, the addition of NT-proBNP measurements to traditional risk assessment in individuals without cardiovascular disease (CVD) can increase the accuracy of the prediction of future CVD or cardiovascular events.
Novel metabolic functions of NPs, including lipolysis activation, lipid oxidation and mitochondrial respiration [2], have been identified in recent years. NPs can also ameliorate lipid-induced insulin resistance (IR) through improvements in hepatic [3] and muscular [4] lipid oxidation. These actions combine to enhance the browning and oxidative potential of white adipose tissue and protect individuals against obesity and IR. Additionally, some data suggest that circulating glucose and insulin alter NP levels. In one study of obese subjects, hyperinsulinemia significantly reduced levels of NP by increasing the expression of the NP-clearance receptor in subcutaneous fat tissue [5]. Based on previous observations, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia may be the mechanisms underlying NP deficiency in obesity and diabetes.
Fatty liver (FL) is common in patients with obesity or IR. Both obesity and IR are associated with lower levels of NT-proBNP. Some studies have demonstrated that FL is associated with low NT-proBNP [6,7,8]. Whether an IR or obesity-specific factor decreases NT-proBNP levels in FL populations or whether common pathological mechanisms exist in FL and IR/obesity, which decrease NT-proBNP levels is currently uncertain. The availability of routine plasma NT-proBNP measurements and abdominal ultrasound (US) on >30,000 young individuals in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study allows for a comprehensive investigation of the association of these variables and NT-proBNP levels. Therefore, we investigated the associations between FL, IR and obesity and NT-proBNP levels in a large, relatively young, healthy and well-characterized occupational cohort.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population
This study included 44,066 individuals who were enrolled in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study (KSHS) from 2016 to 2018 and had their NT-proBNP measurements taken and abdominal US. The KSHS is a retrospective cohort study that has been ongoing for those aged 18 or older who underwent a comprehensive examination at the Total Healthcare Centers of the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital since 2002. Over 80% of participants in the KSHS were employees of various companies or local government organizations. The remaining 20% of participants voluntarily applied for self-paid screening examinations at the health screening center. The screening program aimed to promote health through early detection of chronic diseases and their risk factors. Additionally, the Korean Industrial Safety and Health Law requires employees to participate in an annual or biennial health examination. To minimize the effect of disease or medication on NT-proBNP levels, we excluded 4143 subjects due to hypertension (n = 2180), coronary disease (n = 140), diabetes (n = 821), history of cancer (n = 1285), NT-proBNP > 18,000 (n = 3) and missing information (n = 193). Those taking heart-related medications were also excluded, and some participants met multiple conditions of exclusion; 39,923 participants were included in the final study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (Reference number: KBSMC 2018-06-001), which waived the requirement for informed consent because only retrospectively accessed de-identified data were utilized.
2.2. Measurements
Data on demographic variables, health behaviors, educational background, past medical history and family history of CVD were collected using standardized, self-administered questionnaires [9]. Anthropometric measurements and vital statistics were obtained by professional staff. The questionnaire asked about the frequency of alcohol consumption and the amount of alcohol consumed per consumption day, recorded in standard units [10]. Body weight was measured in light clothing with no shoes to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Physical activity level was assessed using the validated Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form [11] and categorized as sedentary, mild, or health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) [12]. HEPA was categorized if either of the following criteria was met: (i) vigorous intensity activity on ≥3 days per week and accumulating ≥1500 metabolic equivalents minute (MET)/week or (ii) 7 days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous intensity activities, achieving at least 3000 MET minute/week. Physical activity was characterized as mild if any of the following criteria were met: (i) ≥3 days of vigorous activity for ≥20 min/day, (ii) ≥5 days of moderate intensity activity or walking for ≥30 min/day, or (iii) ≥5 days of any combination of walking and moderate or vigorous intensity activities achieving ≥600 MET minute/week. Physical activity was characterized as sedentary if it was not characterized as either mild or HEPA.
Following a minimum of 10 h of fasting, blood samples were obtained and analyzed in a single clinical core laboratory. The core clinical laboratory is certified by the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratories. Serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured using Bayer Reagent Packs (Bayer Diagnostics, Leverkusen, Germany) on an automated chemistry analyzer (Advia 1650 Autoanalyzer; Bayer Diagnostics). Serum creatinine level was measured using the kinetic alkaline picrate method (Jaffe method) on an automated chemistry analyzer (Modular D2400 [Roche]). The eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as described by Levey et al. [13,14]. eGFR was expressed in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2. Serum NT-proBNP levels were determined using an automated immunoassay analyzer (cobas e411; Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). The inter-assay coefficients of variation for quality control specimens of lower levels and higher levels were 1.20–5.37% and 2.28–4.33%, respectively, during the study period.
The diagnosis of FL was based on abdominal US performed by experienced radiologists who were blinded to the aim of the present study. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of FL was determined based on standard criteria, including a diffuse increase of fine echoes in the liver parenchyma compared with kidney or spleen parenchyma, deep beam attenuation and bright vessel walls [15]. The HOMA-IR was calculated as fasting insulin (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/405. Individuals with HOMA-IR in the top quartile were considered to have IR [16]. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 in this Asian population.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as means (standard deviation (SD)) or as median (interquartile ranges) for continuous variables. Categorical data are expressed as numbers and percentages. Baseline variables were compared using Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test as appropriate. The distribution of each variable was verified using a graphical method (histograms). NT-proBNP showed a right-skewed distribution and was transformed into log2 to facilitate interpretation. Regression analyses were repeated using generalized linear models to accommodate variables (FL, HOMA-IR index and BMI) with log2-transformed NT-proBNP, using non-FL and low HOMA-IR index as the reference. Estimated value means the exponential coefficient (exp(β)) from the generalized linear model. Multivariate model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol consumption, educational level and estimated glomerular filtration rate. To assess whether the association between FL and NT-proBNP level is mediated by IR, model 2 was adjusted for the variables in model 1, and BMI and HOMA-IR index. Reported p values were two-tailed, and <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 16.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
3. Results
A total of 39,923 individuals were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the population was 39.1 and 57.6% were male, and 11,704 (29.3%) individuals had FL according to their abdominal US. Baseline characteristics according to the presence of FL are described in Table 1. Individuals with FL were older, were more likely to be obese, consumed more alcohol and had higher LDL-cholesterol levels than the non-FL group. The non-FL group was associated with health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) and better renal function. Liver enzymes were slightly higher in the FL group. The FL group showed a higher median HOMA-IR index (2.0 and 1.2 for the FL group and non-FL group, respectively). NT-proBNP level was significantly lower in the FL group (14.5 ng/dL for the FL group vs. 24.4 ng/dL for the non-fatty liver group).
To assess the association between IR and NT-proBNP levels, we divided the overall population into two groups according to quartiles of the HOMA-IR index. Individuals with HOMA-IR in the top quartile were considered to have IR; 9980 (25.0%) of individuals were categorized as having IR (Table 2). Individuals without IR were older than individuals with IR. Individuals with IR had higher liver enzyme levels, BMI, and blood cholesterol levels. NT-proBNP was significantly lower in the IR group (22.8 for the non-IR group vs. 15.5 for the IR group). Nearly 60% of individuals in the IR group had FL (19.7% for the low HOMA-IR group vs. 58.2% for the high HOMA-IR group).
When stratified by sex (Table 3), males were older, more likely to be obese, consumed more alcohol, and had higher blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol levels than females. Males showed a higher HOMA-IR index (1.5 for males vs. 1.3 for females) and had FL more frequently (43.0% for males vs. 10.6% for females) compared to females. NT-proBNP level was significantly higher in females than males (14.6 vs. 32.8 for males and females, respectively).
We evaluated the effect of each variable (FL, HOMA-IR index and BMI) on NT-proBNP levels using multivariable regression analysis (Table 4). Models were adjusted for sex, age, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, alcohol intake, educational level and estimated glomerular filtration rate. In a multivariable model (model 1), FL was associated with lower levels of NT-proBNP in the overall population (estimate 0.83, 0.82–0.85), and this inverse association was weaker in males. Similarly, higher HOMA-IR index was associated with lower NT-proBNP levels after multivariable adjustment (estimate 0.86, 0.84–0.87). Obesity (as defined by BMI ≥ 25) was also associated with lower NT-proBNP levels (estimate 0.95, 0.93–0.97). These trends for inverse association were observed in both sexes with identical patterns (weaker in males, p for trend by sex < 0.001). We also made a multivariable regression model that adjusted for HOMA-IR score and BMI (model 2) to assess the independent effect of FL on NT-proBNP level; FL still showed an inverse association with NT-proBNP level (estimate 0.86, 0.85–0.88) in this model.
We determined whether or not the presence of FL or high HOMA-IR score affects NT-proBNP levels (Table 5, Figure 1). Using NT-proBNP of the group both without FL and having a low HOMA-IR score as reference, high HOMA-IR scores and FL were associated with low levels of NT-proBNP. Individuals with both FL and high HOMA-IR index were associated with 25% reduction in NT-proBNP levels as compared to NT-proBNP levels in individuals without both FL and IR.
4. Discussion
The novel finding of our study was that FL is an independent indicator for lower NT-proBNP levels in a generally healthy population. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, FL, HOMA-IR index, and BMI were inversely associated with NT-proBNP level. FL had an independent association with NT-proBNP level in a multivariable regression model after adjustment for HOMA-IR index and BMI. Also, our data showed that the combination of FL and high HOMA-IR index is a powerful indicator combination, lowering NT-proBNP levels approximately 25% in our generally healthy population.
IR is a risk factor for diabetes or CVD due to its association with metabolic syndrome; this was demonstrated by Reaven et al. in 1988. The euglycemic clamping test is accurate and continues to be the gold standard procedure for measuring IR [17], but its complexity limits its application in daily medical practice. IR assessment using HOMA-IR has been the most frequently used technique, both in clinical practice and in epidemiological studies due to the simplicity of its determination and measurement. Obesity and FL can be used as other indicators of IR.
FL can easily be evaluated by abdominal US; and FL’s association with metabolic syndrome, diabetes and CVD has been demonstrated, making the presence of FL a good surrogate marker. Also, FL is closely linked to hepatic IR as the HOMA-IR index measures peripheral IR. One report provided evidence to support the causal relationship between hepatic fat accumulation and hepatic IR. This research group showed a dose response relationship between hepatic fat accumulation and hepatic IR, and preventing hepatic fat accumulation abrogated the development of hepatic IR [18].
Using a multivariable regression model adjusted for the HOMA-IR index, which is the most representative indicator of IR, we found that FL is associated with low NT-proBNP levels. An especially interesting finding of our study was that when considering FL and HOMA-IR index together, these variables had synergistic effects on low NT-proBNP levels. The previous Dallas Heart Study supports our results. That study demonstrated an inverse association between BNP/NT-proBNP and liver fat using 1H-MR spectroscopy [19]. In our study, this association remained significant after adjusting for BMI and HOMA-IR score, indicating that liver fat is associated with NT-proBNP levels regardless of obesity or IR. In addition, several other researchers have shown that NT-proBNP levels in individuals with magnetic resonance imaging- or computed tomography-defined non-alcoholic fatty liver disease were decreased significantly [7,8]. These findings are supported by the evidence that NT-proBNP levels are affected by circulating glucose or insulin levels. Hyperinsulinemia has been shown to decrease NP-binding receptors and increase clearance receptors in adipose tissues, leading to lower circulating NP levels, while fasting causes the opposite effect [20]. Since there is an abundance of data suggesting that increased NP levels are protective against IR [19], type 2 diabetes mellitus [21,22] and CVD [23,24], lower levels of NT-proBNP may have opposite effects on IR, diabetes and CVD. Besides the epidemiologic evidence, binding of NP to its receptors stimulates an increase in mitochondrial density, oxygen consumption and insulin sensitivity [25,26], which leads to increased lipolysis in adipose tissue [27,28]. The biological explanation for the accumulation of fat associated with low NT-proBNP can be provided by these metabolic actions. However, this is a cross-sectional study, and it is difficult to determine the causal relationship, so it should be regarded as hypothesis-generating, which may then be developed into testable questions. Further large studies and experimental research are needed to confirm their relationship. These results indicate that higher levels of NT-proBNP may exert protective effects against many cardiovascular risk factors, and NT-proBNP may be a missing link between FL and increased risks of cardiovascular outcomes. Since FL can be easily diagnosed with US, identification of FL provides a potentially useful strategy for finding subjects at increased risk of diabetes or CVD in a healthy population.
There are strengths and limitations in our study, which should be considered when interpreting our findings. We have excluded factors that can influence NT-proBNP to assess the precise association between IR and NT-proBNP, and this is one of the strengths of our research. The large number of individuals included, even after individuals with these factors were excluded, is another strength of our study. Due to the cross-sectional design of our study, our results cannot be interpreted as a causal relationship and should be considered as hypothesis-generating. The presence of FL was assessed using abdominal US, but the sensitivity of US for detecting FL is limited to identification of > 25% fat infiltration [29]. We have also used HOMA-IR > 75% as a marker of IR because more sensitive or specific measurements of insulin sensitivity were not available in this cohort. Since KSHS includes relatively young individuals, there may be limitations in directly applying our results to elderly people. Further comprehensive study is needed to determine the underlying mechanism of lower NT-proBNP in subjects with FL.
5. Conclusions
In this large sample of healthy individuals, FL was independently associated with lower NT-proBNP levels. FL and a high HOMA-IR index remain a powerful indicator combination for lower NT-proBNP levels. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the association between FL and NT-proBNP.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.-I.C., B.K.O., S.J.L., S.H.L., J.-Y.L., B.J.K., B.S.K., J.H.K. and K.-C.S.; methodology, H.-I.C. and K.-C.S.; validation, H.-I.C., B.K.O., S.J.L., S.H.L., J.-Y.L., B.J.K., B.S.K., J.H.K. and K.-C.S.; formal analysis, H.-I.C. and M.Y.L.; data curation, J.G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-I.C.; writing—review and editing, H.-I.C. and K.-C.S.; visualization, H.-I.C. and M.Y.L.; supervision, K.-C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (Reference number: KBSMC 2018-06-001).
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived because only retrospectively accessed de-identified data were utilized.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Yancy, C.W.; Jessup, M.; Bozkurt, B.; Butler, J.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Colvin, M.M.; Drazner, M.H.; Filippatos, G.S.; Fonarow, G.C.; Givertz, M.M.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2017, 136, e137–e161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Schlueter, N.; De Sterke, A.; Willmes, D.M.; Spranger, J.; Jordan, J.; Birkenfeld, A.L. Metabolic actions of natriuretic peptides and therapeutic potential in the metabolic syndrome. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 144, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Birkenfeld, A.L.; Budziarek, P.; Boschmann, M.; Moro, C.; Adams, F.; Franke, G.; Berlan, M.; Marquès, M.-A.; Sweep, F.C.; Luft, F.C.; et al. Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Induces Postprandial Lipid Oxidation in Humans. Diabetes 2008, 57, 3199–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Engeli, S.; Birkenfeld, A.L.; Badin, P.-M.; Bourlier, V.; Louche, K.; Viguerie, N.; Thalamas, C.; Montastier, E.; Larrouy, D.; Harant, I.; et al. Natriuretic peptides enhance the oxidative capacity of human skeletal muscle. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 4675–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pivovarova, O.; Gögebakan, Ö.; Klöting, N.; Sparwasser, A.; Weickert, M.O.; Haddad, I.; Nikiforova, V.J.; Bergmann, A.; Kruse, M.; Seltmann, A.-C.; et al. Insulin Up-Regulates Natriuretic Peptide Clearance Receptor Expression in the Subcutaneous Fat Depot in Obese Subjects: A Missing Link between CVD Risk and Obesity? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E731–E739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Qiao, Z.P.; Zheng, K.I.; Zhu, P.W.; Gao, F.; Ma, H.L.; Li, G.; Li, Y.-Y.; Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D.; Zheng, M.-H. Lower levels of plasma NT-proBNP are associated with higher prevalence of NASH in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1820–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johansen, M.L.; Schou, M.; Rasmussen, J.; Rossignol, P.; Holm, M.R.; Chabanova, E.; Dela, F.; Faber, J.; Kistorp, C. Low N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels are associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 45, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanchez, O.A.; Lazo-Elizondo, M.; Zeb, I.; Tracy, R.P.; Bradley, R.; Duprez, D.A.; Bahrami, H.; Peralta, C.A.; Daniels, L.B.; Lima, J.A.; et al. Computerized tomography measured liver fat is associated with low levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic protein (NT-proBNP). Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Metabolism 2016, 65, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sung, K.-C.; Ryu, S.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-Y.; Wild, S.H.; Byrne, C.D. Effect of exercise on the development of new fatty liver and the resolution of existing fatty liver. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Park, J.-T.; Kim, B.-G.; Jhun, H.-J. Alcohol Consumption and the CAGE Questionnaire in Korean Adults: Results from the Second Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2008, 23, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chun, M.Y. Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form in the Elderly. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2012, 33, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fogelholm MI KA, E.L.; Malmberg JA RM, O.; Suni, J.; Santtila MA TT, I.; Kyröläinen, H.; Mäntysaari, M.; Oja, P. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Validity against fitness. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2006, 38, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Castro, A.F., 3rd; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levey, A.S.; Coresh, J.; Greene, T.; Marsh, J.; Stevens, L.A.; Kusek, J.W.; Van Lente, F.; for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate with Standardized Serum Creatinine Values. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mathiesen, U.; Franzen, L.; Åselius, H.; Resjö, M.; Jacobsson, L.; Foberg, U.; Frydén, A.; Bodemar, G. Increased liver echogenicity at ultrasound examination reflects degree of steatosis but not of fibrosis in asymptomatic patients with mild/moderate abnormalities of liver transaminases. Dig. Liver Dis. 2002, 34, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reilly, M.P.; Wolfe, M.L.; Rhodes, B.T.; Girman, M.C.; Mehta, N.; Rader, D.J. Measures of Insulin Resistance Add Incremental Value to the Clinical Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome in Association With Coronary Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004, 110, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wallace, T.M.; Matthews, D.R. The assessment of insulin resistance in man. Diabet. Med. 2002, 19, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samuel, V.T.; Liu, Z.-X.; Qu, X.; Elder, B.D.; Bilz, S.; Befroy, D.; Romanelli, A.J.; Shulman, G.I. Mechanism of Hepatic Insulin Resistance in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 32345–32353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neeland, I.J.; Winders, B.R.; Ayers, C.R.; Das, S.R.; Chang, A.Y.; Berry, J.D.; Khera, A.; McGuire, D.K.; Vega, G.L.; De Lemos, J.A.; et al. Higher Natriuretic Peptide Levels Associate With a Favorable Adipose Tissue Distribution Profile. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nakatsuji, H.; Maeda, N.; Hibuse, T.; Hiuge, A.; Hirata, A.; Kuroda, Y.; Kishida, K.; Kihara, S.; Funahashi, T.; Shimomura, I. Reciprocal regulation of natriuretic peptide receptors by insulin in adipose cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 392, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Everett, B.M.; Cook, N.R.; Chasman, D.I.; Magnone, M.C.; Bobadilla, M.; Rifai, N.; Ridker, P.M.; Pradhan, A.D. Prospective Evaluation of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Concentrations and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women. Clin. Chem. 2013, 59, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sung, K.-C.; Jeong, W.-S.; Wild, S.H.; Byrne, C.D. Combined Influence of Insulin Resistance, Overweight/Obesity, and Fatty Liver as Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D.; Lonardo, A.; Zoppini, G.; Barbui, C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D. Clinical Review: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A novel cardiometabolic risk factor for type 2 diabetes and its complications. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Miyashita, K.; Itoh, H.; Tsujimoto, H.; Tamura, N.; Fukunaga, Y.; Sone, M.; Yamahara, K.; Taura, D.; Inuzuka, M.; Sonoyama, T.; et al. Natriuretic peptides/cGMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase cascades promote muscle mitochondrial biogenesis and prevent obesity. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2880–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Souza, S.C.; Chau, M.D.; Yang, Q.; Gauthier, M.-S.; Clairmont, K.B.; Wu, Z.; Gromada, J.; Dole, W.P. Atrial natriuretic peptide regulates lipid mobilization and oxygen consumption in human adipocytes by activating AMPK. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 410, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lafontan, M.; Moro, C.; Berlan, M.; Crampes, F.; Sengenès, C.; Galitzky, J. Control of lipolysis by natriuretic peptides and cyclic GMP. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 19, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sengenès, C.; Berlan, M.; de Glisezinski, I.; Lafontan, M.A.X.; Galitzky, J. Natriuretic peptides: A new lipolytic pathway in human adipocytes. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saadeh, S.; Younossi, Z.M.; Remer, E.M.; Gramlich, T.; Ong, J.P.; Hurley, M.; Mullen, K.D.; Cooper, J.N.; Sheridan, M.J. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Forest plots are shown depicting the estimates, Exp(β) for N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Fatty liver and HOMA-IR index (top quartile) were treated as categorical variables. Data points represent the OR ± the standard error. 95% CI indicates 95% confidence interval.
Figure 1.
Forest plots are shown depicting the estimates, Exp(β) for N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Fatty liver and HOMA-IR index (top quartile) were treated as categorical variables. Data points represent the OR ± the standard error. 95% CI indicates 95% confidence interval.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics according to fatty liver on abdominal ultrasound.
| Total (n = 39,923) | Fatty Liver (n = 11,704) | No Fatty Liver (n = 28,219) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 39.1 ± 7.6 | 40.6 ± 7.5 | 38.4 ± 7.6 | <0.001 |
| IPAQ % | <0.001 | |||
| Sedentary | 19,493 (48.83) | 5602 (47.86) | 13,891 (49.23) | |
| Mild | 14,288 (35.79) | 4500 (38.45) | 9788 (34.69) | |
| HEPA | 5998 (15.03) | 1559 (13.32) | 4439 (15.73) | |
| Unknown | 141 (0.35) | 43 (0.37) | 98 (0.35) | |
| Current smoker, % | 4814 (12.06) | 2164 (18.49) | 2650 (9.39) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol intake (g/day) | 4 (1–13) | 6 (2–15) | 4 (1–11) | <0.001 |
| High alcohol intake, % | 3964 (10.58) | 1394 (12.48) | 2570 (9.78) | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.4 ± 3.4 | 26.3 ± 3.1 | 22.3 ± 2.7 | <0.001 |
| Waist, cm | 81.1 ± 9.8 | 89.6 ± 8 | 77.6 ± 8.3 | <0.001 |
| Weight, kg | 67 ± 13.3 | 77.6 ± 11.7 | 62.6 ± 11.3 | <0.001 |
| Higher education, % | 33,449 (83.79) | 9905 (84.63) | 23,544 (83.44) | 0.012 |
| SBP, mmHg | 109 ± 12.1 | 115.4 ± 11.4 | 106.4 ± 11.3 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 69.9 ± 9.4 | 74.6 ± 9.1 | 67.9 ± 8.8 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 93.7 ± 10.9 | 98 ± 13.9 | 92 ± 8.7 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.5 ± 33.1 | 201.6 ± 34.6 | 185.9 ± 31.2 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 127.1 ± 32.1 | 140.9 ± 32.3 | 121.4 ± 30.3 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 61.2 ± 16.6 | 50.4 ± 12.2 | 65.7 ± 16.1 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 91 (65–135) | 140 (101–197) | 78 (59–108) | <0.001 |
| AST, IU/L | 20 (16–24) | 23 (19–30) | 19 (16–22) | <0.001 |
| ALT, IU/L | 19 (13–28) | 30 (21–45) | 16 (12–22) | <0.001 |
| rGTP, IU/L | 20 (14–34) | 34 (23–54) | 17 (12–25) | <0.001 |
| NT-proBNP, ng/L | 20.76 (12.79–35.8) | 14.5 (8.99–23.5) | 24.4 (14.5–40.4) | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 104.1 ± 13.2 | 101.1 ± 13 | 105.3 ± 13 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.38 (0.93–2.04) | 2.03 (1.41–2.92) | 1.19 (0.82–1.7) | <0.001 |
Numbers in the table are mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or percentages. ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BMI = body mass index; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HEPA = health enhancing physical activity; HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance; IPAQ = international physical activity questionnaire; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; rGTP = γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SBP = systolic blood pressure. High alcohol intake defined as >30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women; higher education defined as college graduate or higher.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics according to HOMA-IR index.
| Total (n = 39,923) | HOMA IR < 75% (n = 29,943) | HOMA IR ≥ 75% (n = 9980) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOMA-IR, range | 0.04–30.93 | 0.04–2.03 | 2.03–30.93 | |
| Age | 39.1 ± 7.6 | 39.1 ± 7.6 | 38.8 ± 7.6 | <0.001 |
| IPAQ % | <0.001 | |||
| sedentary | 19,501 (48.83) | 14,289 (47.71) | 5212 (52.2) | |
| Mild | 14,293 (35.79) | 10,725 (35.81) | 3568 (35.74) | |
| HEPA | 6001 (15.03) | 4835 (16.14) | 1166 (11.68) | |
| Unknown | 141 (0.35) | 103 (0.34) | 38 (0.38) | |
| Current smoker, % | 4817 (12.06) | 3387 (11.31) | 1430 (14.32) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol intake (g/day) | 4 (1–13) | 4 (1–11) | 5 (1–14) | <0.001 |
| High alcohol intake, % | 3967 (10.59) | 2888 (10.29) | 1079 (11.48) | 0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.4 ± 3.4 | 22.6 ± 2.9 | 25.9 ± 3.7 | <0.001 |
| Waist, cm | 81.1 ± 9.8 | 78.9 ± 8.7 | 88 ± 9.9 | <0.001 |
| Weight, kg | 67 ± 13.3 | 64.2 ± 11.8 | 75.3 ± 14 | <0.001 |
| Higher education, % | 33,462 (83.79) | 25,348 (84.63) | 8114 (81.27) | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 109 ± 12.1 | 107.2 ± 11.5 | 114.7 ± 12 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 69.9 ± 9.4 | 68.6 ± 9 | 73.5 ± 9.5 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 93.7 ± 10.9 | 91.5 ± 8 | 100.3 ± 14.9 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.5 ± 33.1 | 188.6 ± 32.3 | 196.2 ± 34.7 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 127.1 ± 32.1 | 124.8 ± 31.6 | 134.1 ± 32.7 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 61.2 ± 16.6 | 63.9 ± 16.5 | 53.3 ± 14.3 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 91 (65–135) | 82 (60–115) | 134 (94–193) | <0.001 |
| AST, IU/L | 20 (16–24) | 19 (16–23) | 22 (17–28) | <0.001 |
| ALT, IU/L | 19 (13–28) | 17 (13–25) | 27 (17–42) | <0.001 |
| rGTP, IU/L | 20 (14–34) | 18 (13–29) | 31 (19–52) | <0.001 |
| NT-proBNP, ng/L | 20.77 (12.79–35.8) | 22.8 (14.3–38.7) | 15.5 (9.82–26.86) | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 104.1 ± 13.2 | 104.2 ± 13 | 103.6 ± 13.5 | <0.001 |
| Fatty liver, % | 11,704 (29.3) | 5896 (19.7) | 5808 (58.2) | <0.001 |
Numbers in the table are mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or percentages. ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BMI = body mass index; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HEPA = health enhancing physical activity; HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance; IPAQ = international physical activity questionnaire; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; rGTP = γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SBP = systolic blood pressure. High alcohol intake defined as >30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women; higher education defined as college graduate or higher.
Table 3.
Baseline characteristics according to sex.
| Total (n = 39,923) | Male (n = 23,009) | Female (n = 16,914) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 39.1 ± 7.6 | 39.5 ± 7.5 | 38.4 ± 7.7 | <0.001 |
| IPAQ % | <0.001 | |||
| sedentary | 19,501 (48.83) | 9626 (41.83) | 9875 (58.35) | |
| Mild | 14,294 (35.79) | 9373 (40.73) | 4921 (29.08) | |
| HEPA | 6001 (15.03) | 3950 (17.16) | 2051 (12.12) | |
| Unknown | 141 (0.35) | 64 (0.28) | 77 (0.45) | |
| Current smoker, % | 4817 (12.06) | 4625 (20.1) | 192 (1.13) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol intake (g/day) | 4 (1–13) | 7 (3–19) | 2 (0–6) | <0.001 |
| High alcohol intake, % | 3967 (10.59) | 3138 (14.06) | 829 (5.47) | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.4 ± 3.4 | 24.7 ± 3 | 21.7 ± 3.1 | <0.001 |
| Waist, cm | 81.1 ± 9.8 | 86 ± 8 | 74.6 ± 8.2 | <0.001 |
| Weight, kg | 67 ± 13.3 | 74.8 ± 10.4 | 56.3 ± 8.7 | <0.001 |
| Higher education, % | 33,462 (83.79) | 20,298 (88.2) | 13,164 (77.78) | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 109 ± 12.1 | 113.8 ± 10.9 | 102.6 ± 10.4 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 69.9 ± 9.4 | 73.2 ± 8.8 | 65.3 ± 8.1 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 93.7 ± 10.9 | 95.7 ± 11.2 | 91.1 ± 9.8 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.5 ± 33.1 | 195.8 ± 33.3 | 183.3 ± 31.3 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 127.1 ± 32.1 | 135.1 ± 31.5 | 116.2 ± 29.7 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 61.2 ± 16.6 | 55 ± 13.9 | 69.7 ± 16.3 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 91 (65–135) | 112 (79–162) | 71 (55–97) | <0.001 |
| AST, IU/L | 20 (16–24) | 22 (18–27) | 17 (15–20) | <0.001 |
| ALT, IU/L | 19 (13–28) | 24 (18–35) | 13 (11–18) | <0.001 |
| rGTP, IU/L | 20 (14–34) | 28 (20–45) | 13 (11–18) | <0.001 |
| NT-proBNP, ng/L | 20.77 (12.79–35.8) | 14.6 (9.43–23.38) | 32.8 (21.3–50.3) | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 104.1 ± 13.2 | 100.4 ± 12.7 | 109.1 ± 12.2 | <0.001 |
| HOMA IR (median (IQR)) | 1.38 (0.93–2.03) | 1.49 (1–2.2) | 1.25 (0.84–1.82) | <0.001 |
| Fatty liver, % | 11,704 (29.3) | 9904 (43.0) | 1800 (10.6) | <0.001 |
Numbers in the table are mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or percentages. ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BMI = body mass index; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HEPA = health enhancing physical activity; HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance; IPAQ = international physical activity questionnaire; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; rGTP = γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SBP = systolic blood pressure. High alcohol intake defined as >30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women; higher education defined as college graduate or higher.
Table 4.
Association between fatty liver, HOMA-IR index and BMI with NT-proBNP.
| Total (n = 39,923) | Male (n = 23,009) | Female (n = 16,914) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty liver | |||
| No | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Yes | 0.833 (0.819–0.848) | 0.831 (0.814–0.848) | 0.795 (0.765–0.826) |
| Fatty liver * | |||
| No | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Yes | 0.864 (0.849–0.880) | 0.849 (0.816–0.884) | 0.856 (0.839–0.874) |
| HOMA IR | |||
| 75% < | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| 75% ≥ | 0.859 (0.844–0.874) | 0.859 (0.841–0.877) | 0.844 (0.820–0.869) |
| BMI | |||
| BMI < 25 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| BMI ≥ 25 | 0.951 (0.931–0.971) | 0.939 (0.916–0.962) | 0.939 (0.9–0.978) |
The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, daily alcohol consumption, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and education level. * The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, daily alcohol consumption, estimated glomerular filtration rate, education level and homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance index.
Table 5.
Association of NT-proBNP with fatty liver and HOMA-IR score, accounting for obesity.
| Total (n = 39,923) | Male (n = 23,009) | Female (n = 16,914) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty liver *- high HOMA IR index ** | |||
| No-No | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| No-Yes | 0.888 (0.868–0.908) | 0.900 (0.871–0.929) | 0.869 (0.842–0.897) |
| Yes-No | 0.856 (0.838–0.874) | 0.854 (0.834–0.875) | 0.825 (0.783–0.869) |
| Yes-Yes | 0.755 (0.737–0.773) | 0.752 (0.732–0.773) | 0.712 (0.783–0.869) |
| p for trend | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
* Yes→Presence of fatty liver on abdominal ultrasound. ** Yes→HOMA IR index ≥ 75%. The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, daily alcohol consumption, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and education level. The reference group was group of individuals both without fatty liver and high HOMA-IR index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Choi, H.-I.; Lee, M.Y.; Oh, B.K.; Lee, S.J.; Kang, J.G.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, B.S.; Kang, J.H.; et al. Fatty Liver Is Associated with Low N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Healthy Population. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071402
AMA Style
Choi H-I, Lee MY, Oh BK, Lee SJ, Kang JG, Lee SH, Lee J-Y, Kim BJ, Kim BS, Kang JH, et al. Fatty Liver Is Associated with Low N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Healthy Population. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(7):1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071402
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Hyo-In, Mi Yeon Lee, Byeong Kil Oh, Seung Jae Lee, Jeong Gyu Kang, Sung Ho Lee, Jong-Young Lee, Byung Jin Kim, Bum Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kang, and et al. 2021. "Fatty Liver Is Associated with Low N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Healthy Population" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 7: 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071402
APA StyleChoi, H.-I., Lee, M. Y., Oh, B. K., Lee, S. J., Kang, J. G., Lee, S. H., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, B. J., Kim, B. S., Kang, J. H., & Sung, K.-C. (2021). Fatty Liver Is Associated with Low N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Healthy Population. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(7), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071402
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
