Radiological Cardiothoracic Ratio as a Potential Predictor of Right Ventricular Enlargement in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Due to COVID-19
1
Center for Diagnostic Imaging, University Clinical Hospital in Wrocław, Borowska 213, PL 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Paralympic Sports, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Witelona 25a, PL 51-617 Wroclaw, Poland
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Occupational Diseases and Hypertension, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, PL 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
4
Centre for Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, Weigla 5, PL 50-981 Wroclaw, Poland
5
Department of Population Health, Division of Environmental Health and Occupational Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Mikulicza-Radeckiego 7, PL 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235703
Submission received: 24 October 2021
/
Revised: 20 November 2021
/
Accepted: 2 December 2021
/
Published: 4 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Roles of Cardiac Imaging in Medical Diagnosis and Management)
Abstract
:The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of the radiological cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) as a predictor of right ventricular enlargement in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism during COVID-19. The study group consisted of 61 patients with confirmed COVID-19, suspected of pulmonary embolism based on physical examination and laboratory tests (age: 67.18 ± 12.47 years). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of pulmonary arteries and chest radiograph in AP projection with cardiothoracic ratio assessment were performed in all patients. Right ventricular enlargement was diagnosed by the ratio of right ventricular to left ventricular (RV/LV) dimensions in pulmonary CTA with two cut-off points: ≥0.9 and ≥1.0. Heart silhouette enlargement was found when CTR on the chest radiograph in the projection AP > 0.55. The mean values of RV/LV and CTR in the studied group were 0.96 ± 0.23 and 0.57 ± 0.05, respectively. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 45.9%. Right ventricular enlargement was documented in 44.3% or 29.5% depending on the adopted criterion RV/LV ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ≥ 1.0. Heart silhouette enlargement was found in 60.6%. Patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE+) had a significantly higher RV/LV ratio and CTR than patients with excluded pulmonary embolism (PE−) (RV/LV: PE+ 1.08 ± 0.24, PE− 0.82 ± 0.12; CTR: PE+ 0.60 ± 0.05, PE− 0.54 ± 0.04; p < 0.05). The correlation analysis showed a statistically significant positive correlation between the RV/LV ratio and CTR (r = 0.59, p < 0.05). Based on the ROC curves, CTR values were determined as the optimal cut-off points for the prediction of right ventricular enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ≥ 1.0), being 0.54 and 0.55, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CTR criterion >0.54 as a predictor of RV/LV ratio ≥0.9 were 0.412, 0.963, and 0.656, respectively, while those of the CTR criterion >0.55 as a predictor of RV/LV ratio ≥1.0 were 0.488, 0.833, and 0.590, respectively. In summary, in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism during COVID-19, the radiographic cardiothoracic ratio can be considered as a prognostic factor for right ventricular enlargement, especially as a negative predictor of right ventricular enlargement in the case of lower CTR values.
1. Introduction
The virus SARS-CoV-2 causes a complex of symptoms of a viral respiratory infection, in severe cases causing acute respiratory failure and death [1]. During the pandemic, patients started demonstrating numerous complications other than strictly respiratory ones, e.g., concerning the nervous, vascular, and cardiopulmonary system [2,3]. The literature provides numerous reports regarding a series of cardiovascular complications secondary to COVID-19 [4,5]. Well-recognized cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 are heart damage secondary to cardiac ischemia and/or myocardial infarction as well as myocarditis [6,7,8]. Others include arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock and cardiomyopathy [6]. Another issue related to the COVID-19 infection is the frequent occurrence of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, more common than in the course of other viral infections (e.g., the H1N1 flu virus) [9,10]. Meta-analysis demonstrated respectively 16.5% and 14.8% occurrence of acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in patients infected with COVID-19, whereas more than a half of the patients with pulmonary embolism did not suffer from deep vein thrombosis [11].
In its natural course, pulmonary embolism causes more or less intensive overload of the right cardiac ventricle. It is estimated that about 45% patients with acute pulmonary embolism will develop right ventricular insufficiency [12], and as much as 3.8% of them will develop chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [13]. The right ventricular insufficiency develops because of increased secondary load caused by pulmonary artery occlusion. Once the compensation mechanisms of the right ventricle are exceeded, the right ventricle becomes enlarged and the right ventricular projection is further decreased, leading to a reduced supply of the myocardium with oxygenated blood and ischemia [14].
Apart from the pulmonary embolism, the right ventricular enlargement may cause pulmonic valve stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, arterial and/or ventricular septal defects, tricuspid valve regurgitation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital defects, etc. An assessment of the RV size and functions can be made via echocardiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance [15,16,17]. Although very useful, in COVID-19 infected patients, the echocardiography methods should not be used routinely, due to the risk of transmitting the infection to the personnel. On the other hand, high concurrence of CT and MR measurements is emphasized [16,17].
A test of choice, characterized by high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism is pulmonary artery computed tomography angiography (CTA) [18]. Apart from assessment of the pulmonary embolism itself, the test can be used to evaluate RV enlargement, the morphology of the interventricular septum, etc. An additional, important parameter that can be specified in the pulmonary artery CTA is the RV/LV ratio. This parameter is defined as the ratio of the maximum RV dimension to the corresponding LV dimension, measured from endocardium to endocardium on axial CTA scans, which are the closest to a four-chamber projection, or a reconstructed four-chamber projection. Values of more than 0.9 are considered abnormal [19], and they signify a considerably higher risk of an adverse course of the embolism. It is emphasized that this ratio is highly sensitive (about 92%) for the evaluation of right ventricle insufficiency, and it was considered an independent predictor for a poor prognosis in PE patients [20]. The value of this ratio in the risk stratification for PE patients is also emphasized by the 2019 guidelines issued by ESC and ERS, concerning the diagnostics and treatment in acute pulmonary embolism [21]. Additionally, a large meta-analysis, also cited by the aforesaid guidelines, indicates that a ratio of RV/LV ≥ 1.0 involves a 2.5-fold increase in the risk of death for any reason and a 5-fold increase in the risk of PE-related death [22].
The cardiothoracic ratio is an easy to calculate indicator in the assessment of myocardial enlargement. It is defined as the ratio of the largest transverse heart dimension to the largest transverse chest dimension, measured to the internal rib surface on a chest radiograph [23]. Any value above 0.50 is considered incorrect and may be a sign of cardiomyopathy [24]. Values > 0.55 were considered incorrect for radiographs in the AP projection [25,26], which, in relation to the health condition of patients hospitalized with acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19, is the basic radiographic projection.
The purpose of the study was to determine the usefulness of the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) as a predictor of right ventricular enlargement in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism secondary to COVID-19.
2. Materials and Methods
The study group consisted of 61 patients with confirmed COVID-19, in which pulmonary embolism was suspected based on a physical examination and laboratory tests. Group size was determined using a sample size calculator. The selection conditions were as follows: population size 2 million, fraction size 0.2, maximum error 10%, confidence level 95%. The required minimum size of the study group was 61. The criteria of inclusion in the study were as follows: age ≥ 18 years, a positive result of a nasopharynx smear test against SARS-CoV-2 (detected presence of the N2 gene for SARS-CoV-2 and/or the E gene for Betacoronaviridae using the qRT-PCR method), an increased concentration of D-dimers in the blood, a clinically indicated CTA of the pulmonary arteries and an AP chest radiograph performed within 48 h. The criteria of exclusion in the study were as follows: an ambiguous result of the pulmonary artery CTA scan, a diagnosed pulmonary or mediastinal carcinoma, large amounts of fluid in the pleural cavity/cavities, fluid present in the pericardial sac. The anthropometric parameters of the study group of patients are presented in Table 1.
The studies were performed in one clinic treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and its complications. The study was performed in the first half of 2021.
At subsequent stages, the study group was divided into subgroups, following the criteria of age, BMI, gender, enlarged heart silhouette in chest radiograph as well as enlarged right ventricle, and diagnosed pulmonary embolism in the CTA. The criteria for distinguishing the study subgroups and the sizes of the subgroups are listed in Table 2.
The study was performed as part of the research project titled “Radiologic cardiothoracic ratio as a predictor for the size of the heart estimated via echocardiography, computer tomography and magnetic resonance”, approved by the local bioethical committee (KB-414/2021).
The methodology of the study comprised an analysis of the basic anthropometric parameters and the following diagnostic images: AP chest radiograph (CR) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the pulmonary arteries.
According to the adopted criteria of inclusion in the study, the interval between the pulmonary artery CTA and the AP chest radiograph did not exceed 48 h. In case more than one CR was acquired within 48 h before or after the pulmonary artery CTA, the analysis was performed using the chest radiograph acquired within the shortest interval from the pulmonary artery CTA.
On account of the clinical condition of the patients, chest radiographs were acquired in the lying position, in the anterior–posterior projection (AP), using a bedside X-ray machine. Radiographs were acquired, as far as possible, while the patient was holding their breath, with maximum inhalation, using the X-ray lamp set at 120 kV.
The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) was assessed using a diagnostic station conforming to the legal regulations for radiologic tests. The maximum cardiac width (C width) and the maximum thoracic width (T width) were measured. The value of the cardiothoracic ratio was calculated using the following formula: CTR = C width/T width. Enlargement of the heart silhouette was diagnosed if, in the AP chest radiograph, the CTR > 0.55. An example of the CTR measurement in the AP chest radiograph is presented in Figure 1.
CTAs of the pulmonary arteries were acquired using a 64-slice computed tomography scanner SOMATOM Definition AS+ (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), in accordance with the standard protocol. In this protocol, the sequence of actions was as follows: tomograph, pre-monitoring and monitoring with the ROI set within the pulmonary trunk/left pulmonary artery at the tracheal bifurcation level, and the proper acquisition with a start triggered by the contrast saturation of 100 HU within the ROI. The acquisition encompassed the area from the pulmonary apices to the costophrenic angles. The exposure kilovolt value was 120 units, with variable mAs values. The scans were performed using intravenous contrast with a constant volume of 60 mL non-ionic contrast, infused with an automatic syringe into the cubital fossa veins, at the infusion rate of 4.0 mL/s. Basic reconstructions were made in axial planes, in 3.0 mm and 0.75 mm slices, along with secondary reconstructions MPR and MIP in frontal and sagittal planes.
The pulmonary artery CTA images required for this analysis were assessed using an application for post-processing of computed tomography images, syngo.CT Cardiac Function (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), by two staff radiologists experienced in the assessment of cardiac and vascular angiography images. Pulmonary embolism (PE+) was diagnosed in cases where filling defects in the pulmonary arteries were found. To assess right ventricle enlargement, the size of both ventricles was measured. The size of the right and left ventricle (RV diameter and LV diameter) was measured based on a multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), in a four-chamber projection, perpendicularly to the long axis of the ventricles, at 1/3 distance between the mitral valve and the apex. The diameter of a ventricle was recognized as the distance between the endocardium of the free wall of the ventricle and the endocardium of the interventricular septum. The papillary muscles were included in the lumen of the chamber. Each time, the average measurement result was considered the final RV diameter and LV diameter values. At the time of the measurement, the radiologists assessing the ventricle dimension had no knowledge of the CTR value. Enlargement of the right ventricle was diagnosed based on the ratio of the right and left ventricle size (RV/LV) in the pulmonary artery CTA, using two different cut-off points: ≥0.9 and ≥1.0. An example of measuring the RV/LV ratio in the pulmonary artery CTA is presented in Figure 2.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Dell Statistica 13 (Dell Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) application. For quantitative variables, arithmetic means and standard deviations were calculated. The Shapiro–Willke test was used to verify normal distribution of the variables. Quantitative independent variables with normal distribution were further analyzed using a t test for independent variables. Variables with distribution other than normal were analyzed using the U Mann–Whitney test for independent quantitative variables. Results for the qualitative variables were expressed as a percentage. Qualitative variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Correlation was analyzed to specify the relationship between the analyzed variables. Pearson correlation coefficients were determined for quantitative variables with normal distribution, and Spearman correlation coefficients for quantitative variables with distribution other than normal. Moreover, the accuracy was tested, with proposed cut-off points for the tests estimated based on the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves. The adopted statistical significance level was p < 0.05.
3. Results
The average CTR value in the study group of the patients was 0.57 ± 0.05. Radiological enlargement of the heart silhouette was diagnosed in 60.6% of the subjects. Based on the CTA of the pulmonary arteries, pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 45.9% of the subjects. The average RV/LV ratio was 0.96 ± 0.23. Right ventricle enlargement, depending on the adopted criterion of RV/LV ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ≥ 1.0, was documented in 44.3% or 29.5% of subjects. The results of the heart silhouette measurement by a chest radiograph and the results of the analyzed variables in the pulmonary artery CTA in the examined group of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism secondary to COVID-19 are presented in Table 3.
A comparative analysis of the subgroups divided on the basis of the CTR cut-off point of 0.55 demonstrated that the patients with enlarged heart silhouette were characterized by statistically significantly higher values of the RV/LV in the pulmonary artery CTA than the patients with non-enlarged heart silhouette; they also significantly more often met the criteria of right ventricle enlargement (both defined as RV/LV ≥ 0.9 and as RV/LV ≥ 1.0). The selected variables of the pulmonary artery CTA in the study subgroups divided on the basis of the criterion of enlarged heart silhouette in the chest radiograph are presented in Table 4.
When comparing the subgroups divided on the basis of the cut-off points RV/LV ≥ 0.9 and RV/LV ≥ 1.0, it was documented that the patients with an enlarged right ventricle had statistically significantly higher CTR values than those with non-enlarged right ventricles. In patients with enlarged right ventricle, the heart silhouette enlargement (defined as CTR > 0.55 in the AP chest radiograph) was observed statistically significantly more often than in patients with non-enlarged right ventricle. The size of the heart silhouette in CR of study subgroups divided on the basis of the criterion of right ventricle enlargement in the pulmonary artery CTA is presented in Table 4.
In a comparison of the subgroups divided on the basis of diagnosed pulmonary embolism, it was found that the patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism had statistically significantly higher CTR and RV/LV than those with excluded pulmonary embolism. In the patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism, enlarged heart silhouette was found statistically significantly more often than in those with excluded pulmonary embolism. These study subgroups demonstrated no differences in the frequency of enlarged right ventricle in the pulmonary artery CTA. The size of the heart silhouette in CR and the selected variables of the pulmonary artery CTA in the study subgroups divided on the basis of the criterion of pulmonary embolism diagnosed in the pulmonary artery CTA are presented in Table 4.
A correlation analysis demonstrated the existence of a statistically significant positive correlation between RV/LV and CTR (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), (Figure 3).
The demonstrated correlation occurred in all the divided subgroups, except for the group with excluded pulmonary embolism. The results of an analysis of the heart silhouette size in the chest radiograph and the size of the right ventricle in the pulmonary artery CTA in the whole study group and study subgroups are presented in Table 5.
The ROC curves were used to determine CTR values constituting optimal cut-off points for the prediction of right ventricle enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ≥ 1.0), amounting to 0.54 and 0.55, respectively (Figure 4A,B).
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CTR > 0.54 as a predictor for RV/LV ≥ 0.9 were 0.412, 0.963, and 0.656, respectively, while those of CTR > 0.55 as a predictor for RV/LV ≥ 1.0 were 0.488, 0.833, and 0.590, respectively. The test accuracy analysis indicated that the predictors had a significantly higher specificity than sensitivity. The results of the accuracy analysis for the radiological cardiothoracic ratio as a predictor of right ventricle enlargement in the pulmonary artery CTA for the whole study group are presented in Table 6.
Table 6 present also the results of an analysis performed in the divided subgroups. The radiological cardiothoracic ratio with the highest accuracy is a predictor of right ventricle enlargement in the pulmonary artery CTA in the subgroups of females, overweight/obese patients, and patients aged ≥ 71 years.
4. Discussion
COVID-19 has become an enormous epidemiological problem for the entire world; we witnessed as numerous health care systems in many countries around the globe collapsed one by one. Apart from acute respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia, this illness involves numerous complications, including cardiovascular ones. In 28 out of the 61 patients in the investigated group, the pulmonary artery CTA scan demonstrated the presence of pulmonary embolism (45.9%), which confirms the weight of the problem in patients hospitalized with diagnosed COVID-19. Similar percentages of pulmonary embolism were reported by researchers from Italy (44.7%) [27] and London (46.2%) [28] for their respective groups. Right ventricular failure is one of the main problems in this patient group.
Dimensioning of the right ventricle is reflected in the guidelines regarding the diagnostics and treatment of pulmonary embolism, and the RV/LV ratio may be a prognostic factor [21]. To assess advanced pneumonia, patients admitted to hospitals often undergo a chest radiograph, usually AP, on account of their health condition. When interpreting these radiographs, it is possible to determine the cardiothoracic ratio, which does not prolong the interpretation task in any significant way. Earlier studies already demonstrated that the CTR could be a prognostic factor for myocardial enlargement in various illnesses [29,30,31,32]. Values >0.55 were considered incorrect for radiographs in the AP projection [25,26], and the same value was demonstrated in a study investigating the dependence between CTR in the AP projection and heart measurements in computed tomography [33].
According to our data analysis, such determined CTR can be considered as a prognostic factor for right ventricular enlargement in patients with pulmonary embolism secondary to COVID-19. RV/LV was significantly higher in patients with enlarged heart silhouette than in patients with non-enlarged heart silhouette. CTR was significantly higher in patients with an enlarged right ventricle (higher RV/LV) than in patients with non-enlarged right ventricles (lower RV/LV). There was a positive correlation between RV/LV and CTR. In addition, the accuracy of CTR > 0.54 as a predictor for RV/LV ≥ 0.9 was 65.6%. However, considering that the specificity of prediction is much higher than its sensitivity (over 80% compared to less than 50%), especially lower CTR values may indicate a lack of right ventricular enlargement in patients with COVID-19. The high sensitivity of prediction always indicates the usefulness of the test in confirming a given state, while the high specificity of prediction indicates the usefulness of the test in excluding a given state.
The research published so far also confirms our observations, although the number of these studies is small. Researchers from Iran proved that CTR determined during a chest CT is a strong predictor for mortality in patients with COVID-19, and its values grow together with the affected volume of the pulmonary parenchyma. Just like us, the researchers demonstrated that over half of the patients had increased CTR; in our group it was 60.6% [34]. Considering the lack of any statistically significant difference between CTR determined on a chest radiograph and in computed tomography [35], one can conclude that a clinically indicated radiograph could be one of the screening factors in the evaluation of right ventricle enlargement; also, a study on the association between the CTR and the ventricle size in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure demonstrated a higher relationship between the CTR and RV than LV size [36].
Researchers from Warsaw reached different conclusions, when they failed to prove a significant CTR value in predicting the right ventricle size in a different group of patients, namely those after a Fallot tetralogy correction [37]. The same applies to the general population of minors with heart defects [38]; it was demonstrated that in healthy children the correlation between the CTR and the size of the heart chambers determined via echocardiography was small [39]. This merits the question of how the surgery and the defect itself affected the shape and consequently the size of the heart silhouette and chest in the radiograph, and did it affect the CTR measurements? Another research work that negated a significant added value of the CTR in the assessment of the right ventricle size was a study on the relation between these parameters in patients with restrictive pulmonary diseases (pure restrictive ventilatory impairment) [40]. In this study, the researchers observed only a small correlation between the CTR and enlarged right ventricle (this study was undoubtedly limited by the size of the study group, which was only 19 patients). The studies performed on the adult population referred to in this paragraph emphasized the lack of any added value provided by the estimation of RV size on a lateral radiograph.
The Iranian researchers, while indicating significantly lower value to estimating heart size using CTR than using echocardiography, at the same time emphasized the prevalence of the radiographic method and cited it as a good, low-cost screening assessment for heart silhouette enlargement [41].
Our study was encumbered by several limitations, which still fail to significantly reduce the value of the results. In terms of the studied group, the limitations included the small size of the study group, the lack of data on pharmacotherapy for chronic diseases, as well as the inability to perform analyses in subgroups of patients with specific comorbidities (due to the insufficient size of the subgroups, which would be created based on the criteria for the occurrence of subsequent comorbidities). The results of the present study are a starting point for further studies on a larger group of patients, which will allow consideration for the importance of comorbidities, as well as their pharmacotherapy. In terms of the research methodology itself, the following limitations should be mentioned. The study did not consider the volume of the pulmonary parenchyma affected by the inflammation, while from a pathophysiological perspective, an increase in the affected volume of the pulmonary parenchyma would increase the afterload of the right ventricle, which may cause an enlargement of the right ventricle, and, in consequence, the CTR. Therefore, these data should be related to the volume of the lungs affected by the inflammation, particularly in the group of patients without diagnosed pulmonary embolism, but with a diagnosed enlargement of the right ventricle or CTR. Additionally, determination of the CTR on an AP radiograph has numerous limitations. Due to the health condition of the patients in the study group, it was not possible to perform a PA radiograph; therefore, it appears that comparing the CTR measurement to the CTR determined in pulmonary CTA could provide added value. Moreover, we had no access to chest radiographs or chest CT scans of the patients that were taken before current hospitalization. It seems that excluding patients with prior CTR and RA/LV increases from the study group could improve the sensitivity and specificity of the assessment for the investigated parameters in the context of pulmonary embolism secondary to COVID-19. Finally, the pulmonary artery CTA was only performed on patients with suspected pulmonary embolism instead of the whole group, making it impossible to determine the number of patients with clinically silent pulmonary embolism.
5. Conclusions
In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism secondary to COVID-19, the radiological cardiothoracic ratio can be considered as a prognostic factor for right ventricular enlargement. Considering that the specificity of prediction is much higher than its sensitivity, especially lower CTR values may indicate a lack of right ventricular enlargement in patients with COVID-19.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.G. and R.P.; methodology, K.T. and P.G.; software, P.G. and R.P.; investigation, K.T. and P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.T. and P.G.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and R.P.; visualization, K.T.; supervision, P.G. and R.P.; project administration, P.G.; funding acquisition, P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. APC was financed by the Wroclaw Medical University.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University (protocol code KB-414/2021).
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.
Data Availability Statement
Study data can be made available upon documented request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Dong, E.; Du, H.; Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 533–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Esakandari, H.; Nabi-Afjadi, M.; Fakkari-Afjadi, J.; Farahmandian, N.; Miresmaeili, S.M.; Bahreini, E. A comprehensive review of COVID-19 characteristics. Biol. Proced. Online 2020, 22, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.; Qin, M.; Shen, B.; Cai, Y.; Liu, T.; Yang, F.; Gong, W.; Liu, X.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Guo, T.; Fan, Y.; Chen, M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; He, T.; Wang, H.; Wan, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cascella, M.; Rajnik, M.; Aleem, A.; Dulebohn, S.C.; Di Napoli, R. Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (COVID-19); StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Böhm, M.; Frey, N.; Giannitsis, E.; Sliwa, K.; Zeiher, A.M. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its implications for cardiovascular care: Expert document from the German Cardiac Society and the World Heart Federation. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2020, 109, 1446–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clerkin, K.J.; Fried, J.A.; Raikhelkar, J.; Sayer, G.; Griffin, J.M.; Masoumi, A.; Jain, S.S.; Burkhoff, D.; Kumaraiah, D.; Rabbani, L.; et al. COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2020, 141, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bunce, P.E.; High, S.M.; Nadjafi, M.; Stanley, K.; Liles, W.C.; Christian, M.D. Pandemic H1N1 influenza infection and vascular thrombosis. Clinical infectious diseases: An official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, e14–e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bompard, F.; Monnier, H.; Saab, I.; Tordjman, M.; Abdoul, H.; Fournier, L.; Sanchez, O.; Lorut, C.; Chassagnon, G.; Revel, M.P. Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2001365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, Y.J.; Hong, H.; Ohana, M.; Bompard, F.; Revel, M.P.; Valle, C.; Gervaise, A.; Poissy, J.; Susen, S.; Hékimian, G.; et al. Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2021, 298, E70–E80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bĕlohlávek, J.; Dytrych, V.; Linhart, A. Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Exp. Clin. Cardiol. 2013, 18, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
- Pengo, V.; Lensing, A.W.; Prins, M.H.; Marchiori, A.; Davidson, B.L.; Tiozzo, F.; Albanese, P.; Biasiolo, A.; Pegoraro, C.; Iliceto, S.; et al. Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bryce, Y.C.; Perez-Johnston, R.; Bryce, E.B.; Homayoon, B.; Santos-Martin, E.G. Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A pictorial essay for the interventional radiologist. Insights Imaging 2019, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dandel, M.; Hetzer, R. Evaluation of the right ventricle by echocardiography: Particularities and major challenges. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2018, 16, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawel-Boehm, N.; Maceira, A.; Valsangiacomo-Buechel, E.R.; Vogel-Claussen, J.; Turkbey, E.B.; Williams, R.; Plein, S.; Tee, M.; Eng, J.; Bluemke, D.A. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J. Soc. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2015, 17, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Takx, R.A.; Moscariello, A.; Schoepf, U.J.; Barraza, J.M., Jr.; Nance, J.W., Jr.; Bastarrika, G.; Das, M.; Meyer, M.; Wildberger, J.E.; Schoenberg, S.O.; et al. Quantification of left and right ventricular function and myocardial mass: Comparison of low-radiation dose 2nd generation dual-source CT and cardiac MRI. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012, 81, e598–e604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, P.D.; Fowler, S.E.; Goodman, L.R.; Gottschalk, A.; Hales, C.A.; Hull, R.D.; Leeper, K.V., Jr.; Popovich, J., Jr.; Quinn, D.A.; Sos, T.A.; et al. PIOPED II Investigators Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 2317–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lu, M.T.; Demehri, S.; Cai, T.; Parast, L.; Hunsaker, A.R.; Goldhaber, S.Z.; Rybicki, F.J. Axial and reformatted four-chamber right ventricle-to-left ventricle diameter ratios on pulmonary CT angiography as predictors of death after acute pulmonary embolism. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 198, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Becattini, C.; Agnelli, G.; Vedovati, M.C.; Pruszczyk, P.; Casazza, F.; Grifoni, S.; Salvi, A.; Bianchi, M.; Douma, R.; Konstantinides, S.; et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: Diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.J.; Harjola, V.P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jiménez, D.; et al. ESC Scientific Document Group 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 543–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meinel, F.G.; Nance, J.W., Jr.; Schoepf, U.J.; Hoffmann, V.S.; Thierfelder, K.M.; Costello, P.; Goldhaber, S.Z.; Bamberg, F. Predictive Value of Computed Tomography in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danzer, C.S. The cardiothoracic ratio: An index of cardiac enlargement. Am. J. Med Sci. 1919, 157, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearney, M.T.; Fox, K.A.; Lee, A.J.; Prescott, R.J.; Shah, A.M.; Batin, P.D.; Baig, W.; Lindsay, S.; Callahan, T.S.; Shell, W.E.; et al. Predicting death due to progressive heart failure in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chon, S.B.; Oh, W.S.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, S.J. Calculation of the cardiothoracic ratio from portable anteroposterior chest radiography. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2011, 26, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kabala, J.E.; Wilde, P. The measurement of heart size in the antero-posterior chest radiograph. Br. J. Radiol. 1987, 60, 981–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ippolito, D.; Giandola, T.; Maino, C.; Pecorelli, A.; Capodaglio, C.; Ragusi, M.; Porta, M.; Gandola, D.; Masetto, A.; Drago, S.; et al. Acute pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia: Multicentric experience from Italian endemic area. La Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlachou, M.; Drebes, A.; Candilio, L.; Weeraman, D.; Mir, N.; Murch, N.; Davies, N.; Coghlan, J.G. Pulmonary thrombosis in Covid-19: Before, during and after hospital admission. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 51, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dimopoulos, K.; Giannakoulas, G.; Bendayan, I.; Liodakis, E.; Petraco, R.; Diller, G.P.; Piepoli, M.F.; Swan, L.; Mullen, M.; Best, N.; et al. Cardiothoracic ratio from postero-anterior chest radiographs: A simple, reproducible and independent marker of disease severity and outcome in adults with congenital heart disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 166, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemingway, H.; Shipley, M.; Christie, D.; Marmot, M. Cardiothoracic ratio and relative heart volume as predictors of coronary heart disease mortality. The Whitehall study 25 year follow-up. Eur. Heart J. 1998, 19, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yotsueda, R.; Taniguchi, M.; Tanaka, S.; Eriguchi, M.; Fujisaki, K.; Torisu, K.; Masutani, K.; Hirakata, H.; Kitazono, T.; Tsuruya, K. Cardiothoracic Ratio and All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Events in Hemodialysis Patients: The Q-Cohort Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 70, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanapirak, C.; Sirichotiyakul, S.; Luewan, S.; Srisupundit, K.; Tongprasert, F.; Tongsong, T. Appearance of Abnormal Cardiothoracic Ratio of Fetuses with Hemoglobin Bart’s Disease: Life Table Analysis. Auftreten einer abnormalen kardiothorakalen Ratio bei Feten mit Hämoglobin-Bart-Erkrankung: Eine Life-Table-Analyse. Ultraschall Med.-Eur. J. Ultrasound 2017, 38, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, H.; Chowdhry, D.N.; Olsen, A.; Nemer, O.; Wahl, L. Is there any diagnostic value of anteroposterior chest radiography in predicting cardiac chamber enlargement? Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 35, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eslami, V.; Abrishami, A.; Zarei, E.; Khalili, N.; Baharvand, Z.; Sanei-Taheri, M. The Association of CT-measured Cardiac Indices with Lung Involvement and Clinical Outcome in Patients with COVID-19. Acad. Radiol. 2021, 28, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, J.; Singer, A.; Hinrichs, C.; Contractor, S.; Doddakashi, S. Cardiac dimensions derived from helical CT: Correlation with plain film radiography. Internet J. Radiol. 1999, 1, 8223. [Google Scholar]
- Fukuta, H.; Ohte, N.; Brucks, S.; Carr, J.J.; Little, W.C. Contribution of right-sided heart enlargement to cardiomegaly on chest roentgenogram in diastolic and systolic heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007, 99, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spiewak, M.; Małek, L.A.; Biernacka, E.K.; Kowalski, M.; Michałowska, I.; Hoffman, P.; Miśko, J.; Demkow, M.; Rużyłło, W.; Marczak, M. Cardiothoracic ratio may be misleading in the assessment of right- and left-ventricular size in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Clin. Radiol. 2014, 69, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grotenhuis, H.B.; Zhou, C.; Tomlinson, G.; Isaac, K.V.; Seed, M.; Grosse-Wortmann, L.; Yoo, S.J. Cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiograph in pediatric heart disease: How does it correlate with heart volumes at magnetic resonance imaging? Pediatric Radiol. 2015, 45, 1616–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davidson, A.; Krull, F.; Kallfelz, H.C. Cardiomegaly—what does it mean? A comparison of echocardiographic to radiological cardiac dimensions in children. Pediatric Cardiol. 1990, 11, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shivkumar, K.; Ravi, K.; Henry, J.W.; Eichenhorn, M.S.; Stein, P.D. Chest radiographs fail to detect right ventricular enlargement and right atrial enlargement in patients with a pure restrictive ventilatory impairment. Chest 1994, 106, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biharas Monfared, A.; Agha Farajollah, S.; Sabour, F.; Farzanegan, R.; Taghdisi, S. Comparison of radiological findings of chest x-ray with echocardiography in determination of the heart size. Iran. Red. Crescent Med. J. 2015, 17, e18242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
An example of CTR measurement on a chest radiograph in the AP projection. A: transverse dimension of the heart silhouette, B: transverse dimension of the chest.
Figure 1.
An example of CTR measurement on a chest radiograph in the AP projection. A: transverse dimension of the heart silhouette, B: transverse dimension of the chest.
Figure 2.
An example of RV/LV ratio measurement in CTA of pulmonary arteries. A: right ventricle diameter, B: left ventricle diameter.
Figure 2.
An example of RV/LV ratio measurement in CTA of pulmonary arteries. A: right ventricle diameter, B: left ventricle diameter.
Figure 3.
Correlation between RV/LV ratio in CTA of pulmonary arteries and CTR in chest radiograph in the AP projection.
Figure 3.
Correlation between RV/LV ratio in CTA of pulmonary arteries and CTR in chest radiograph in the AP projection.
Figure 4.
ROC curves for predicting right ventricular enlargement (RV/LV ratio ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ratio ≥ 1.0 in pulmonary CTA) using the CTR value on the chest radiograph in the AP projection. (A) Right ventricular enlargement defined as RV/LV ≥ 0.9 in pulmonary CTA. (B) Right ventricular enlargement defined as RV/LV ≥ 1.0 in pulmonary CTA.
Figure 4.
ROC curves for predicting right ventricular enlargement (RV/LV ratio ≥ 0.9 or RV/LV ratio ≥ 1.0 in pulmonary CTA) using the CTR value on the chest radiograph in the AP projection. (A) Right ventricular enlargement defined as RV/LV ≥ 0.9 in pulmonary CTA. (B) Right ventricular enlargement defined as RV/LV ≥ 1.0 in pulmonary CTA.
Table 1.
General characteristics of the study group.
| X | SD | |
|---|---|---|
| age [years] | 67.18 | 12.47 |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 28.11 | 3.84 |
| % | n | |
| gender | ||
| men | 63.9 | 39 |
| women | 36.1 | 22 |
| age | ||
| <60 years | 16.4 | 10 |
| ≥60 years | 83.6 | 51 |
| body mass | ||
| normal | 22.9 | 14 |
| overweight | 50.8 | 31 |
| obesity | 26.2 | 16 |
| comorbidities | ||
| a history of myocardial infarction | 14.7 | 9 |
| a history of stroke | 13.1 | 8 |
| arterial hypertension | 24.6 | 15 |
| peripheral arterial disease | 9.8 | 6 |
| diabetes | 11.5 | 7 |
| a history of cancer | 13.1 | 8 |
| COPD | 14.7 | 9 |
| asthma | 4.9 | 3 |
| stomach and duodenal ulcers | 4.9 | 3 |
| chronic kidney disease | 3.3 | 2 |
| hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism | 8.2 | 5 |
| osteoporosis | 13.1 | 8 |
BMI—body mass index; COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; n—number; SD—standard deviation; X—mean.
Table 2.
Criteria for distinguishing the study subgroups.
| Differentiating Variable | Selection Criterion | Subgroup | Size of the Subgroup |
|---|---|---|---|
| age | median age (71 years) | A: ≥71 years B: <71 years | A: 33 B: 28 |
| BMI | upper limit of the normative value (25 kg/m2) | C: overweight/obesity (≥25 kg/m2) D: normal body mass (<25 kg/m2) | C: 47 D: 14 |
| gender | E: men F: women | E: 39 F: 22 | |
| enlargement of the heart silhouette | cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on chest radiograph in antero-posterior projection > 0.55 | G: enlarged heart silhouette (CTR > 0.55) H: non-enlarged heart silhouette (CTR ≤ 0.55) | G: 37 H: 24 |
| enlargement of the right ventricle | right ventricle diameter to left ventricle diameter ratio (RV/LV) in CTA ≥ 0.9 | I: enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) J: non-enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV < 0.9) | I: 27 J: 34 |
| right ventricle diameter to left ventricle diameter ratio (RV/LV) in CTA ≥ 1.0 | K: enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) L: non-enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV < 1.0) | K: 18 L: 43 | |
| pulmonary embolism | presence of embolic material in pulmonary arteries on CTA | M: confirmed pulmonary embolism N: excluded pulmonary embolism | M: 28 N: 33 |
BMI—body mass index; CTA—computed tomography angiography.
Table 3.
The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables in the CTA examination of the pulmonary arteries in the study group.
Table 3.
The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables in the CTA examination of the pulmonary arteries in the study group.
| X | SD | |
|---|---|---|
| C width [mm] | 189.10 | 27.61 |
| T width [mm] | 331.59 | 33.61 |
| CTR | 0.57 | 0.05 |
| RV diameter [mm] | 49.55 | 14.33 |
| LV diameter [mm] | 51.66 | 8.77 |
| RV/LV | 0.96 | 0.23 |
| % | n | |
| CTR > 0.55 | 60.6 | 37 |
| RV/LV ≥ 0.9 | 44.3 | 27 |
| RV/LV ≥ 1.0 | 29.5 | 18 |
| PE+ | 45.9 | 28 |
C width—transverse dimension of the heart silhouette; CTR—cardiothoracic ratio; LV—left ventricle; PE+—pulmonary embolism; RV—right ventricle; T width—transverse dimension of the chest.
Table 4.
The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables in the CTA examination of the pulmonary arteries in the study subgroups. (A) Selected variables of pulmonary artery CTA in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of cardiac enlargement in the chest radiograph. (B) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of right ventricular enlargement in the CTA of pulmonary arteries (if RV/LV ≥ 0.9 defines right ventricular enlargement). (C) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of right ventricular enlargement in the CTA of pulmonary arteries (if RV/LV ≥ 1.0 defines right ventricular enlargement). (D) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables of the CTA of the pulmonary arteries in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of pulmonary embolism in the CTA of the pulmonary arteries.
Table 4.
The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables in the CTA examination of the pulmonary arteries in the study subgroups. (A) Selected variables of pulmonary artery CTA in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of cardiac enlargement in the chest radiograph. (B) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of right ventricular enlargement in the CTA of pulmonary arteries (if RV/LV ≥ 0.9 defines right ventricular enlargement). (C) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of right ventricular enlargement in the CTA of pulmonary arteries (if RV/LV ≥ 1.0 defines right ventricular enlargement). (D) The size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and selected variables of the CTA of the pulmonary arteries in the study subgroups divided according to the criterion of pulmonary embolism in the CTA of the pulmonary arteries.
| A | Enlarged Heart Silhouette: CTR > 0.55 (Subgroup G, n = 37) | Non-Enlarged Heart Silhouette: CTR ≤ 0.55 (Subgroup H, n = 24) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | SD | X | SD | ||
| RV diameter [mm] | 53.12 | 15.42 | 44.04 | 10.53 | 0.014 |
| LV diameter [mm] | 51.65 | 9.43 | 51.67 | 7.83 | 0.994 |
| RV/LV | 1.03 | 0.24 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 0.004 |
| % | n | % | n | ||
| RV/LV ≥ 0.9 | 59.5 | 22 | 20.8 | 5 | 0.003 |
| RV/LV ≥ 1.0 | 40.5 | 15 | 12.5 | 3 | 0.019 |
| PE+ | 54.0 | 20 | 33.3 | 8 | 0.057 |
| B | Enlarged Right Ventricle: RV/LV ≥ 0.9 (Subgroup I, n = 27) | Non-Enlarged Right Ventricle: RV/LV < 0.9 (Subgroup J, n = 34) | p | ||
| X | SD | X | SD | ||
| C width [mm] | 198.80 | 24.65 | 181.39 | 27.73 | 0.013 |
| T width [mm] | 333.56 | 31.60 | 330.03 | 35.51 | 0.688 |
| CTR | 0.60 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| % | n | % | n | ||
| CTR > 0.55 | 81.5 | 22 | 44.1 | 15 | 0.003 |
| C | Enlarged Right Ventricle: RV/LV ≥ 1.0 (Subgroup K, n = 18) | Non-Enlarged Right Ventricle: RV/LV < 1.0 (Subgroup L, n = 43) | p | ||
| X | SD | X | SD | ||
| C width [mm] | 199.11 | 28.16 | 184.91 | 26.59 | 0.067 |
| T width [mm] | 332.00 | 31.56 | 331.42 | 34.79 | 0.951 |
| CTR | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 0.003 |
| % | n | % | n | ||
| CTR > 0.55 | 83.3 | 15 | 51.2 | 22 | 0.019 * |
| D | Confirmed Pulmonary Embolism (Subgroup M, n = 28) | Excluded Pulmonary Embolism: (Subgroup N, n = 33) | p | ||
| X | SD | X | SD | ||
| C width [mm] | 199.49 | 26.06 | 176.85 | 24.53 | 0.001 |
| T width [mm] | 334.09 | 33.64 | 328.64 | 33.94 | 0.533 |
| CTR | 0.60 | 0.05 | 0.54 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| RV diameter [mm] | 56.04 | 15.32 | 41.89 | 8.09 | <0.001 |
| LV diameter [mm] | 51.88 | 9.43 | 51.39 | 8.09 | 0.831 |
| RV/LV | 1.08 | 0.24 | 0.82 | 0.12 | <0.001 |
| % | n | % | n | ||
| CTR > 0.55 | 85.7 | 24 | 39.4 | 13 | 0.002 |
| RV/LV ≥ 0.9 | 57.1 | 16 | 33.3 | 11 | 0.062 |
| RV/LV ≥ 1.0 | 39.3 | 11 | 21.2 | 7 | 0.122 |
* Statistical significance; C width—transverse dimension of the heart silhouette; CTR—cardiothoracic ratio; LV—left ventricle; PE+—pulmonary embolism; RV—right ventricle; T width—transverse dimension of the chest.
Table 5.
Correlation of the size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and the size of the right ventricle in the CTA of the pulmonary arteries in the study group and subgroups.
Table 5.
Correlation of the size of the heart silhouette in the chest radiograph and the size of the right ventricle in the CTA of the pulmonary arteries in the study group and subgroups.
| Group/Subgroup | RV/LV vs. CTR Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient (r) | p | |
| whole study group | 0.59 | <0.001 |
| subgroup A: ≥71 years | 0.61 | <0.001 |
| subgroup B: <71 years | 0.55 | 0.002 |
| subgroup C: overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) | 0.61 | <0.001 |
| subgroup D: normal body mass (BMI < 25 kg/m2) | 0.58 | 0.029 |
| subgroup E: men | 0.44 | 0.005 |
| subgroup F: women | 0.78 | <0.001 |
| subgroup G: enlarged heart silhouette (CTR > 0.55) | 0.52 | 0.001 |
| subgroup H: non-enlarged heart silhouette (CTR ≤ 0.55) | 0.42 | 0.039 |
| subgroup I: enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | 0.47 | 0.013 |
| subgroup J: non-enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV < 0.9) | 0.44 | 0.010 |
| subgroup K: enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | 0.67 | 0.002 |
| subgroup L: non-enlarged right ventricle (RV/LV < 1.0) | 0.56 | <0.001 |
| subgroup M: confirmed pulmonary embolism | 0.43 | 0.012 |
| subgroup N: excluded pulmonary embolism | 0.29 | 0.127 |
CTR—cardiothoracic ratio; LV—left ventricle; RV—right ventricle.
Table 6.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiographic cardiothoracic ratio as a predictor of right ventricular enlargement in pulmonary CTA. (A) In the whole group. (B) In subgroups divided according to the age criterion. (C) In subgroups divided according to the BMI criterion. (D) in subgroups divided according to the gender criterion. (E) in subgroups divided according to the pulmonary embolism criterion.
Table 6.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiographic cardiothoracic ratio as a predictor of right ventricular enlargement in pulmonary CTA. (A) In the whole group. (B) In subgroups divided according to the age criterion. (C) In subgroups divided according to the BMI criterion. (D) in subgroups divided according to the gender criterion. (E) in subgroups divided according to the pulmonary embolism criterion.
| A | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTR value that is the optimal cut-off point for prediction based on the ROC curve | >0.54 | >0.55 | ||
| sensitivity | 0.412 | 0.488 | ||
| specificity | 0.963 | 0.833 | ||
| accuracy | 0.656 | 0.590 | ||
| positive predictive value | 0.933 | 0.875 | ||
| negative predictive value | 0.565 | 0.405 | ||
| likelihood ratio of a positive result | 11.118 | 2.930 | ||
| likelihood ratio of a negative result | 0.611 | 0.614 | ||
| B | Subgroup A: ≥71 Years | Subgroup B: <71 Years | ||
| Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | |
| CTR value that is the optimal cut-off point for prediction based on the ROC curve | >0.55 | >0.55 | >0.58 | >0.58 |
| sensitivity | 0.556 | 0.455 | 0.875 | 0.810 |
| specificity | 0.933 | 0.909 | 0.417 | 0.429 |
| accuracy | 0.727 | 0.606 | 0.679 | 0.714 |
| C | Subgroup C: Overweight/Obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) | Subgroup D: Normal Body Mass (BMI < 25 kg/m2) | ||
| Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | |
| CTR value that is the optimal cut-off point for prediction based on the ROC curve | >0.59 | >0.55 | >0.73 | >0.73 |
| sensitivity | 0.882 | 0.488 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| specificity | 0.385 | 0.750 | 0.077 | 0.083 |
| accuracy | 0.745 | 0.511 | 0.143 | 0.214 |
| D | Subgroup E: Men | Subgroup F: Women | ||
| Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | |
| CTR value that is the optimal cut-off point for prediction based on the ROC curve | >0.59 | >0.55 | >0.58 | >0.58 |
| sensitivity | 0.789 | 0.348 | 0.933 | 0.882 |
| specificity | 0.300 | 0.769 | 0.429 | 0.400 |
| accuracy | 0.538 | 0.487 | 0.773 | 0.773 |
| E | Subgroup M: Confirmed Pulmonary Embolism | Subgroup N: Excluded Pulmonary Embolism | ||
| Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 0.9) | Prediction of Right Ventricular Enlargement (RV/LV ≥ 1.0) | |
| CTR value that is the optimal cut-off point for prediction based on the ROC curve | >0.62 | >0.72 | >0.54 | >0.55 |
| sensitivity | 0.917 | 1.000 | 0.591 | 0.731 |
| specificity | 0.238 | 0.125 | 0.833 | 0.500 |
| accuracy | 0.485 | 0.576 | 0.643 | 0.714 |
CTR—cardiothoracic ratio; LV—left ventricle; ROC—receiver operating characteristic; RV—right ventricle.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Truszkiewicz, K.; Poręba, M.; Poręba, R.; Gać, P. Radiological Cardiothoracic Ratio as a Potential Predictor of Right Ventricular Enlargement in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Due to COVID-19. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235703
AMA Style
Truszkiewicz K, Poręba M, Poręba R, Gać P. Radiological Cardiothoracic Ratio as a Potential Predictor of Right Ventricular Enlargement in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Due to COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(23):5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235703
Chicago/Turabian StyleTruszkiewicz, Krystian, Małgorzata Poręba, Rafał Poręba, and Paweł Gać. 2021. "Radiological Cardiothoracic Ratio as a Potential Predictor of Right Ventricular Enlargement in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Due to COVID-19" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 23: 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235703
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
