Next Article in Journal
Forecasting Progressive Trends in Keratoconus by Means of a Time Delay Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Benefits of Steroid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Different PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at Admission
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Number of Pregnancies and Deliveries and Their Association with Selected Morphological and Hemodynamic Parameters of the Pelvic and Abdominal Venous System
Review

Understanding Chronic Venous Disease: A Critical Overview of Its Pathophysiology and Medical Management

1
Department of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
2
Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain
3
Cancer Registry and Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias, 28806 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
4
Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
5
Department of Vascular Surgery, Príncipe de Asturias Hospital, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
6
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA
7
Immune System Diseases—Rheumatology and Internal Medicine Service, University Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, (CIBEREHD), 28806 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equality in this work.
These authors shared senior authorship in this work.
Academic Editor: Attilio Cavezzi
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3239; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153239
Received: 29 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 22 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Phlebology and Lymphology)

Abstract

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a multifactorial condition affecting an important percentage of the global population. It ranges from mild clinical signs, such as telangiectasias or reticular veins, to severe manifestations, such as venous ulcerations. However, varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of CVD. The explicit mechanisms of the disease are not well-understood. It seems that genetics and a plethora of environmental agents play an important role in the development and progression of CVD. The exposure to these factors leads to altered hemodynamics of the venous system, described as ambulatory venous hypertension, therefore promoting microcirculatory changes, inflammatory responses, hypoxia, venous wall remodeling, and epigenetic variations, even with important systemic implications. Thus, a proper clinical management of patients with CVD is essential to prevent potential harms of the disease, which also entails a significant loss of the quality of life in these individuals. Hence, the aim of the present review is to collect the current knowledge of CVD, including its epidemiology, etiology, and risk factors, but emphasizing the pathophysiology and medical care of these patients, including clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatments. Furthermore, future directions will also be covered in this work in order to provide potential fields to explore in the context of CVD.
Keywords: chronic venous disease (CVD); varicose veins; venous pathophysiology; vascular therapies; venous hypertension chronic venous disease (CVD); varicose veins; venous pathophysiology; vascular therapies; venous hypertension

1. Introduction

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a persistent, progressive, and frequently underestimated condition widely represented in the general population, having a huge socioeconomic, physical, and psychological impact associated [1,2]. CVD entails a broad spectrum of venous abnormalities in which blood return is seriously compromised. In the pathophysiology of CVD, the interplay between genetics and environmental factors are responsible for increasing the ambulatory venous pressure, leading to substantial changes in the whole structure and functioning of the venous system [3]. Importantly, the term CVD should be differed from chronic venous disorder, which only includes the full morphological and functional abnormalities of the venous system, but without considering the clinical manifestations and other serious concerns affecting the patient [4].
Varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of CVD. Other venous signs of CVD include telangiectasias and reticular veins. Despite these, clinical signs may affect any vein in the body, the venous system located in the lower limbs is often the most vulnerable structure to suffer CVD [5]. This is mainly due to the increased resistance to overcome by the gravitational force, which is notably higher than the rest of regions in the body. In the lower limbs, three great systems may be distinguished: superficial veins, represented mainly by the great saphenous vein, the small saphenous vein, the anterior accessory saphenous vein and their tributaries; deep veins, the major transporter of blood flow; and perforating veins, connecting both systems [6]. From a histological perspective, veins are conformed by three layers: (1) tunica intima or inner layer, mainly conformed by endothelial cells (ECs); (2) the tunica media or media layer, represented by vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and little elastic fibers; and (3) tunica adventitia or outer layer, which is composed by connective tissue, with an important development of elastic fibers, giving the vessel an important support and elasticity [7]. In the case of VV however, the normal structure of the vein is altered, with prominent changes in the thickness and composition of the venous wall [8]. In addition, veins present venous valves, bicuspid prolongations from the venous tissue essential to maintain the blood flow in the proper direction, impeding venous reflux [9]. Furthermore, different muscle pumps act coordinately with the venous valves to assure the unidirectional blood flow. The calf muscle, often named the “peripheral heart”, is especially considered the most prominent enhancer of venous return from lower limbs to heart [10]. Importantly, failures in both systems are also crucial to understand the pathogenesis and progression of CVD leading to a venous reflux and to venous stasis [11,12,13,14]. The anatomy of the venous system in the lower limbs, its physiology, and histology are briefly summarized in Figure 1.
The term chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) includes the most severe manifestations, such as edema, skin changes, or leg ulcers [15], frequently, associated with a poorer quality of life of these patients [16]. Different criteria are currently established to distinguish CVD presentations. CEAP (clinical–etiology–anatomy–pathophysiology) classification is a globally accepted method to study venous disorders. It is based on different medical features that permits to accurately analyze the clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathological status of veins [17]. In this context, it is frequent to use clinical (C) manifestations to refer specific CVD presentations. For instance, VVs could be classified as C2 while CVI is comprised between C3 to C6 stages [18]. As CVD, and particularly CVI, are a worrisome and a growing concern in westernized societies while representing a challenge either for the individual or the healthcare system, the purpose of this review is to collect the current knowledge of CVD from an integrative perspective. Therefore, different approaches including epidemiology and risk factors, diagnosis, etiology, pathophysiology, and utilized treatments will be tackled. Moreover, future directions and important considerations will also be addressed.

2. Epidemiology and Risk Factors

CVD is a common disorder that affects an important percentage of people in the world. In general terms, the estimated prevalence of CVD ranges from 60 to 80% [19,20,21], although these data may be highly heterogeneous in the literature depending on the populations studied, the methods followed and disease definitions [22]. Most cases are defined as C0 and C1 classes, while approximately 25% of patients are diagnosed with VVs (C2). CVI (C3–C6) concern small percentage of patients with CVD, representing up to a 5% of patients [23]. The incidence of VVs was about 2.6% for females and 1.9% for males, according to the Framingham study [24]. Thus, it is recognized that the risk for suffering from VV and CVI is higher in women than men, and it also increases with age, therefore explaining its great prevalence and growing incidence [25]. Furthermore, this condition may entail important consequences for the quality of life (QOL) of the affected individuals. In fact, even patients with uncomplicated VVs note a significant reduction on their QOL and if untreated they will surely progress to CVI [26]. Only in the United States, more than 25 million people are affected by CVD and approximately 6 million present advanced stages and CVI, with an estimated cost of USD 3 billion per year [27]. Thus, it is undeniable that CVD represents one of the most frequent vascular diseases in the world, entailing an important burden not only for the individual, but also for the healthcare systems.
As above mentioned, age is one of the major risk factors of CVD. According to the Edinburgh Vein Study, ~1 in 3 patients developed CVI from the initial VV diagnosis after a 13-year follow-up, with the rate consistently augmenting with age [28]. Vuylsteke et al. [29] reported that elder individuals (>65 years) were more vulnerable to the different risk factors associated to CVD, with differential effects according to the geographical regions. Thus, elder people are notably susceptible of suffering from CVD and progress to CVI, particularly when combined with other risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI) [30] and the female gender [31]. The reasons why women are more likely to suffer from CVD, reside on different hormonal and physiological factors that make them more sensitive to develop this condition [32]. In this group, pregnant women (PW) are more prone to develop this condition, with approximately 40% of them suffering from CVD [33]. In addition, the number of pregnancies might also be a variable of note to acquire this condition. Thus, it is estimated that 20% of nulliparous women over 40 years old will undergo VVs. However, this percentage increases to 40% in the case of women who were pregnant 1 to 4 times and up to a 65% in those with five or more gestations [34]. Apart from female sex and aging, a plethora of risk factors have been identified in the development of CVD. Overweight and obesity are one of the best-established factors directly related to CEAP C categories, independently from the rest of risk factors [35]. This could be due to many plausible and synergic effects, including the pro-inflammatory status generally associated to the increased adiposity, and other factors, such as an augmented intra-abdominal pressure, which may lead to greater reflux, increased vein diameter, and venous pressure [36]. Sedentarism is another important risk factor to develop and aggravate CVD manifestations [37]. Conversely, physical activity was not related with higher risk of CVD, but it is seen as an essential method to prevent its progression [38]. Prolonged sitting and, more prominently, prolonged standing are also recognized as risk factors for suffering from CVD [39]. Frequently, both situations are related to occupational positions. Family history of CVD is also recognized as a risk factor for suffering this condition [40]. Moreover, previous events of blood clots in the veins -prominently deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has also been described as a potential risk factor for suffering from CVD [41], as well as regular smoking [42]. On the other hand, more doubts remain regarding the possible association between height and CVD. Although some studies have described a causal relationship [43], it seems that height does not influence on the progression of the disease [44]. Overall, there are many risk factors that could be related to the onset and development of CVD as they may influence different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the onset and progression of the disease.

3. Clinical Manifestations

As above mentioned, CEAP classification is the most accurate and globally used method to establish a precise CVD diagnosis. It is based on clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathophysiological criteria. Main values assigned in CEAP are summarized in Table 1. In this part we will summarize clinical manifestations (C) of CVD whereas etiology (E) and pathophysiology (P) will be subsequently discussed. The use of this system allows a better classification for patients with the aim to study their initial symptoms and progression of the disease, [45]. The main limitation of this method is, however, the interobserver variability that may depend on the experience of the physician [46]. According to CEAP, we consider C0 when there are no clinical signs of CVD, C1 with telangiectasias/reticular veins, C2 correspond to the presence of VVs, and C3–C6 as CVI, ranging from edema and dermatological alterations (C3/C4 respectively) to healed and active ulcerations (C5/C6) [18].
Clinical manifestations in the initial stages of the disease are often scarce, and the more CVD progress, the more symptomatology will appear [47]. VVs are the most representative manifestation in the venous system, although reticular veins and telangiectasias might also be recognized as important clinical signs [48]. In advanced stages, the most important expression of CVI consist of the lower limb pain, usually defined as heaviness, discomfort, or pressure exacerbated at the end of the day. Patients frequently show a malleolar edema with fovea getting worse under situations in which venous pressure increases and the lymphatic drainage is impaired [49]. Differential diagnosis should exclude other causes of the edema, such as cardiac insufficiency, hypoalbuminemia, or hypothyroidism, among others [50]. On the contrary, patients usually refer to the presence of dilated superficial tortuous veins clearly identified as an esthetic alteration. Additionally, patients with CVI are also more susceptible to suffer from DVT mainly in the femoropopliteal segment, with the added risk of pulmonary thromboembolism, a potentially mortal condition [51]. Superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) could also be distinguished as a potential clinical sign of CVD. Although for a long time this manifestation was considered as a harmless condition, recent evidence warn about the dangerous of suffering from SVT, as it is also significantly associated to an increased risk to develop DVT and pulmonary thromboembolism [52]. Moreover, in advanced stages of valvular incompetence, a superficial traumatism on large VVs could result in a hemorrhage, which could be fatal in some cases [53].
Furthermore, during advanced CVI stages (CVI ≥ 4), the inflammatory environment and edema affect skin and subcutaneous tissues, finally leading to epidermis breaking and the development of cutaneous ulcerations [54]. Prior changes in the skin includes eczema [55] and pigmentation, which appears to be caused mainly by a hemosiderin deposit occurred in early stages of CVI [56], lipodermatosclerosis, a specific chronic fibrosing panniculitis related to CVI [57] and corona phlebectatica, identified as an abnormal visible cutaneous blood vessels at the ankle with four components: “venous cups,” blue and red telangiectasias, and capillary “stasis spots” [58]. Furthermore, a rare malignant skin degeneration could also be observed in patients with CVI [59,60]. These skin changes and their clinical manifestations are strongly associated with a worse QOL of these patients [61]. Moreover, these cosmetic defects may have important consequences not only on physical but also on the psychosocial well-being of the individual [62]. It is of note that many patients with CVI may suffer from depression and anxiety, mainly due to the esthetical concerns, long-term complications and the submission to the different therapeutic regimens [63]. In this sense, Blättler et al. [64] have recently conducted a study aiming to inquire the neuropsychological impact of CVD. They observed that some individuals with mild venous pathology may refer venous symptoms that are not be correlated with their clinical state. Collectively, it can be concluded that CVD should be handled from an integrative perspective, utilizing different tools and questionnaires to accurately evaluate the QOL of these patients [65]. Particularly, Villalta-Prandoni scale (SF-36) and EuroQol 5D scale, which may be repeated over time while demonstrating its efficacy on validating this aspect of the disease [66,67].

4. Diagnosis

First, a clinical history of the patient must be carefully conducted considering allergies, previous medical prescriptions (hormonal contraceptives, anticoagulants, etc.), family history of VVs or CVD and personal antecedents of thromboembolism, cardiovascular or other relevant disease [68]. Likewise, the presence of specific symptomatology of CVD must also be assessed. Then, patients will be subjected to a physical exploration with the aim to find clinical signs of CVD, such as VVs, edema, skin changes, or venous ulcerations [69].
Regarding diagnostic methods used in CVD, color duplex ultrasound (CDU) is the most used investigational exam [70]. In fact, CDU has replaced the rest of the diagnostic techniques because of being non-invasive, reproducible, and easy to use while importing data about vein morpho-hemodynamic changes in the affected limb/s. [71]. Thus, the use of CDU is essential to conduct a proper management of the patient [72]. Similarly, the use of CDU could also be useful to assess the presence of the venous pathology in the abdominal or pelvic areas [73,74].
Likewise, the use of other procedures, such as plethysmography, might be useful to identify pathophysiological mechanisms occurring in the patient by distinguishing among venous reflux, obstruction, or both, or conversely, muscle pump dysfunction. However, it does not offer the possibility of studying anatomical features [75]. Computed tomography venography or magnetic resonance are also valuable techniques in the CVD diagnosis, although it is normally reserved to complex cases with prominent venous alterations, malformations, or abdominal affections [76].

5. Etiology and Pathogenesis of CVD

CVD is a vascular disorder in which venous return is compromised. According to the CEAP classification, the etiology of CVD could be as follows: (1) primary CVD; (2) secondary CVD, which in turn are divided into (i) intravenous secondary causes; (ii) extravenous secondary causes; and (3) congenital CVD [77].

5.1. Primary CVD

Primary CVD could be defined as a progressive process occurred in the venous wall or venous valve that leads to an abnormal dilatation and weakness in the vein, eventually resulting in pathological and demonstrated reflux. Primary CVD is frequently manifested in the saphenous veins, which is known as truncal insufficiency [78], although it could also be presented in the superficial non-truncal tributaries’ veins [79,80]. The use of animal models has shed light on the pathogenesis of primary CVD, recognizing that the sustained induction of ambulatory venous hypertension injured the vein wall and venous valves; hence, promoting the development and progression of CVD [81]. However, unlike experimental models where the increased venous pressure is induced by the researcher, the etiological agents of venous hypertension in human beings are much more complex.
Primary CVD is the result of different genetic and environmental factors. The vast majority of people with CVD are carriers of certain polymorphisms or genetic variants that are in part responsible for the development of the disease. In fact, it is estimated that the genetic component of CVD is approximately a 17% [82]. The remaining proportion resides on a wide variety of environmental components generally associated to the previous mentioned risk factors [83]. As an example, quiet standing for 30 min was enough to trigger an inflammatory response in the venous wall [84], as the venous pressure while standing is higher in comparison to the pressure while sitting and even higher than the pressure when walking. Permanent standing in the workplace starts a persistent and harming venous stasis that progressively makes subjects more vulnerable to suffer from venous reflux and CVI, particularly if combined with other factors like aging [85]. Progesterone has also been identified as an important etiological agent of CVD, as it is associated with SMC relaxation, vasodilation, and valvular incompetence [86]. Similarly, a redistribution of progesterone receptors has been shown to participate in the progression of the disease [87]. In the case of PW, significant changes occur, mainly due to hormonal, hemodynamic and mechanical factors, which induce an important remodeling in the venous system that may be associated with the onset and progression of CVD [88,89,90].

5.2. Secondary CVD

Secondary CVD are those cases in which the manifestation of the disease is caused by a previous event that, as mentioned below, could be subdivided into secondary intravenous—when the vein wall and valves are adversely affected—and secondary extravenous, in which there is no evidence of vein damage, but the local or systemic venous hemodynamic is impaired (e.g., external causes, such as central venous hypertension, extrinsic compression caused by a tumoral mass, by arteries such as in May-Thurner syndrome, or in case of diaphragmatic or limb muscle pump dysfunction) [77].
The most common cause of secondary intravenous CVD is a previous episode of acute DVT. DVT is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting approximately 1 in 1000 of individuals per year [91]. Primary CVI is identified as a risk factor for suffering DVT [51]. In turn, clinical or subclinical DVT is identified as a potential cause of CVI [92]. A central link in this bidirectional relationship may reside on different genes shared in both pathologies, such as the THBD (thrombomodulin) and MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) [43]. Apart from genetics, the increased venous pressure and damage in the venous wall may conduct to the development of both CVD and DVT. In contrast, DVT is characterized by the formation of a thrombus, caused by the interaction of the coagulation components with the endothelium and hemodynamics (stasis), generally affecting deep veins located in the lower limbs [93]. This could provoke a plethora of morphological changes in the venous wall and result in a combination of partial obstruction and reflux, leading to severe presentations, such as pain, venous claudication, edema, skin changes, and ulceration; these clinical manifestations of CVI typically characterize post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) [94]. Moreover, secondary CVD progresses more rapid than primary CVD [95], similarly being associated with a poorer QOL of these patients [96]. It is estimated that around a 20 to 50% of patients who suffered an episode of DVT will develop PTS, while a 5 to 10% will progress to venous ulceration [97]. Thus, an adequate management of patients after being diagnosed of DVT will be essential to prevent the appearance of PTS and severe forms of CVI.
Likewise, post-traumatic CVD should also be mentioned here. The cause of vascular trauma is blunt trauma (fractures or dislocations), penetrating trauma (caused by bullets, knives, etc.), or a combination of both, and they could affect either upper or lower extremities [98]. There are five types of vascular traumas: intimal injuries, complete wall defects with pseudoaneurysms or hemorrhage; complete transections with hemorrhage or occlusion; arteriovenous fistulas; and spasms [99]. Epidemiologically, the occurrence of CVD secondary to a traumatic event in the general population is very rare (1% to 2% of the total cases), as penetrating traumas are more frequently related with this condition, with higher exposure of the military setting [98]. The clinical management of vascular traumas represent an important challenge, as they might correlate with a high morbidity and mortality. In the case of venous traumas, vascular repair and ligation are the most frequent approaches used [100]. However, previous studies have demonstrated an increased risk for developing CVI even after either ligation or repair [101]. In this line, Bhatti et al. [102] found that traumatic arteriovenous fistula was the most common reason of unusual secondary VVs; therefore, showing the impact of venous trauma on CVD etiopathogenesis. Similarly, a prior trauma is also related with a greater risk of DVT and pulmonary thromboembolism [103]. Therefore, venous trauma may represent a relevant secondary cause of CVD, being equally associated with DVT and other vascular disorders.

5.3. Congenital CVD

The influence of genetics in the CVD pathogenesis is extraordinarily complex [104]. As previously defined, family history of CVD is an important risk factor from suffering this condition. Notwithstanding, the genetic factors usually interact with environmental agents, the role of certain single gene mutations might be enough to cause venous disorders [105]. In this section, we summarize the association of particular genetic alterations in the development of CVD.
Venous angiodysplasias, such as Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS), are a major example of congenital CVD. KTS is a vascular disorder generally caused by somatic mutations in the PI3KCA gene [106]. Inheritance of KTS is quite complex. Some authors have considered it to be a paradominant inheritance [107], while in other cases it appears to provide a dominant inheritance [108]. Finally, inherited gene translocations have also been reported [109,110]. Howsoever, KTS is associated to an overgrowth in the vascular cells, leading to the development of different signs, such as cutaneous hemangiomas (Port-wine stains), lymphatic, or venous malformations [111]. Thus, patients with KTS exhibit a wide variety of venous complications, such as severe venous hypertension, complex reflux patterns, advanced valvular incompetence, calf muscle pump impairment and DVT, and venous ulcer development [112,113].
Parkes Weber syndrome (PWS) is another congenital vascular disorder affecting capillary, lymphatic, venous and arteriovenous malformations. PWS is frequently misdiagnosed with KTS, although the latter does not present arteriovenous fistulas [114]. In addition, the gene involved in PWS appears to be RASA1, which is mutated up to a 50% of the patients. Nonetheless, 10% of the cases might be attributed to alterations in the EPHB4 gene [115]. The remaining 40% of pathogenic gene variants are still undiscovered. Similar to KTS, PWS is characterized by limb overgrowth and vascular malformations, leading to a persistent venous hypertension, dilation, and varicogenesis [116]. Moreover, approximately 1 in 4 patients with PWS show chronic venous ulcerations [117]. Thus, it would be crucial to identify and elaborate proper management of patients with either PWS or KTS, as they are more likely to suffer severe CVI and venous complications. Other syndromes related to the development of CVD include lymphedema distichiasis syndrome (LDS), characterized by FOXC2 mutations, cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), affecting the Notch3, Chuvash Polycythemia (VHL mutations), severe congenital neutropenia type 4 (alterations in the G6PC3), and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), with defective COL3A1 functioning [118]. Overall, these genetic mutations result, irretrievably, in the development of CVI, due to vascular and congenital malformations. Fortunately, this only represents a little group of patients with CVD. The different etiopathogenic mechanisms of CVD are presented in Figure 2.

6. Pathophysiology

CVD is a multifactorial disease involving complex pathophysiological mechanisms. The increased ambulatory venous pressure and vein dilation in the lower limbs promotes an intricate vascular response, leading to stasis and consequent secondary inflammatory response, and altered shear stress. Obstruction and/or reflux are the two main pathomechanisms leading to significant changes in the venous wall and pathological venous reflux, thereby contributing to the progression of CVD [119]. Moreover, these changes provide the creation of a hypoxic environment, which is thought to be an important contributor in the pathophysiology of the disease. Moreover, the role of certain gene mutations or variants are also implicated either in the etiology or pathophysiology of the disease. Similarly, epigenetic alterations have also been found in patients with CVD, as well as evidence of systemic markers of damage related to the progression of the disease [37,120,121,122]. In this section we will collect the current knowledge of these pathophysiological mechanisms occurring in CVD in order to understand the most important properties of the disease.

6.1. Hemodynamic and Microcirculatory Alterations

Venous return from the lower limbs entails more difficulties than arterial circulation due to the defiance of gravity. Several morphofunctional diagnostic tests are employed to investigate CVD; together with ultrasound-based instruments, plethysmograph methods are used in combination, although they have not been standardized yet. The measurements are based on the changes in volume within veins evaluating venous filling index [123,124].
In the event of CVD, venous hypertension and dilation induces a decrease in shear stress, the frictional force within ECs. ECs sense these changes and transduce the physical signals from fluid shear stress into the altered biomolecular signaling; this prompts the typical vicious cycle in CVD, inducing hypertension, venous wall remodeling, and inflammation [3,125].
In the lower leg, ankle venous ambulatory pressure normally decreases to about 35 mm Hg [126]. In patients with CVD, this value tends to increase proportionally to the CEAP stratification [127]. The different pressure gradient may be an activator of neovascularization and reflux recurrence in the event of varicose vein treatment [128]. On the other hand, continuous changes in venous pressure with edema and hypoxemia as clinical manifestations, promote microcirculatory adverse reaction and eventually leg ulcerations [129]. In the course of CVD towards CVI, the microangiopathic changes involve a decreased number of capillaries and increased permeability of these vessels and an impairment of the lymphatic microcirculation, allowing fluid, proteins, and blood cells extravasation. These changes also explain a worse skin perfusion by nutritive capillaries and the tendency of developing venous ulcers [130]. Likewise, the increased permeability triggers inflammation due to the infiltration of white blood cells (WBCs), with cytokine release, and activation of proteolytic enzymes and platelet activating factor [131]. Hence, shear stress modulating EC behavior leads to increased permeability, controlling leukocyte performance as well.
The role of venous valves should be the prevention of backflow of blood and pooling generation; however, mechanical stress promotes their incompetence. The measurement of the reflux and obstruction components in CVD patients may serve to prognose the severity of their venous clinical condition [132]. Incompetence of perforators and deep veins is highly present in severe CVI, provoking hypoxia and ulceration in the skin. Some contrasting evidence exists about the role of perforating veins in CVI onset and deterioration, questioning the need for perforator treatment [37].
Furthermore, deep venous system is surrounded by muscles that, when contracting, press veins in favor of blood return. For this reason, peripheral muscle pumps in lower limbs are other elements to analyze in order to understand the hemodynamic alterations occurred in CVD, especially calf muscle pump. Physiologically, it acts as a pump for deep leg veins within mainly gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Sedentary lifestyle, long time standing, possible muscle/tendon/nerve/joint diseases, and being overweight promote deficient calf pump activity, leading to venous reflux, swelling, CVI, and in the worst cases, DVT. The disturbance in the calf muscle pump is then a key pathophysiological factor, which also implied a deficient healing of leg ulcers and a larger size of them in patients with profound CVI and worse prognosis [133].
Therefore, valves competence, calf muscle pumps, venous wall integrity, and elasticity determine venous pressure difference, altered hemodynamics in the lower limbs, and ultimately, chronic venous disorders or diseases [134]. Under normal conditions, in comparison to arteries, veins present a thicker adventitia layer and thinner media layer, with more content of collagen and reduced quantity of smooth muscle cells. This confers to the venous tissue the properties of reduced elasticity, but higher extensibility. Hence, blood return will particularly depend more on the accompanying muscles and valves. At present, there is a lack of studies related to venous mechanical properties as there are plenty in the case of arteries. Some reviewed literature alleges that, in the case of thrombosis, the vein gains stiffness and loses extensibility [135]. Although there is not much current evidence, comparative studies have demonstrated that the thicker venous wall in VV, adapted to undergoing increased pressure and turbulences, entails a different type of collagen composition besides a lower content of elastin (as detailed below) with decreased extensibility and elasticity contributing to the reflux effect and slackness for blood return generating pooling [136,137].
As described, vein function is harmed by this impaired hemodynamic system, implying hemorheological changes as summarized in Figure 3. This will lead to the extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in adaptation, shaping vessel alterations, with important changes in composition that will later be discussed, demonstrating that biochemical alterations go together with biomechanical changes.

6.2. Inflammation and the Role of Endothelial Dysfunction

Inflammation is widely accepted as a hallmark of CVD, playing a pivotal role in the onset and progression of the disease [119,138,139]. Vascular inflammation is a complex process involving multiple interactions between WBCs, ECs, SMCs, and the ECM. This abnormal communication is also orchestrated by an uncontrolled release of cytokines, leading to a pathological vascular response [140]. The main causes of the exacerbated inflammatory response reside on the hemodynamic abnormalities and microcirculatory changes associated to CVD, which may initiate a persistent immune response [141]. However, fully understanding the role of inflammation in CVD is essential to highlight the role of the endothelium. Because of the hemodynamic alterations and altered shear stress during CVD, ECs might suffer important phenotypical variations. Meaningfully, these changes have been recognized as important drivers of many vascular disorders [142]. In this line, previous studies have shown a pro-inflammatory switch of ECs in people affected with CVD, therefore contributing to the entry of leukocytes in the pathological veins [143]. Herein, the role of the glycocalyx should be highlighted. During vascular diseases, the glycocalyx located in the ECs is prominently altered leading to an alteration of the endothelial mechanotransduction. This promotes the breakdown of the permeability barrier, enhancing the access of leukocytes and favoring the inflammatory reaction [144]. Thus, the proper development of CVI will lead to cumulative changes in the glycocalyx and ECs, leading to a progressive endothelial dysfunction. Accordingly, the grade of endothelial dysfunction was shown to be associated with the clinical severity of CVD [145]. Moreover, endothelial dysfunction appears to represent a central pathophysiological link between CVD and DVT [146], therefore showing the relevance of endothelial damage in the progressive inflammation and development of this condition.
In regard to immune populations, an increased infiltration of either innate or adaptative leukocytes have been evidenced in patients with CVD in comparison to healthy individuals [47,147]. Leukocytes interact with ECs in two stages: (1) a rapid phase known as I type activation characterized by EC vasoconstriction, selectin expression and von Willebrand factor release and (2) stage or “II type activation” involving adhesion molecules, cytokines, and tissue factor [148]. Monocytes/macrophages are central mediators of the inflammatory responses in CVD. Ono et al. [149] observed that incompetent venous valves were associated with an increased monocyte/macrophage infiltrate. Powell et al. [150] claimed that CVI with and without venous ulceration were related to high platelet-monocytes activation and aggregation. Furthermore, the role of macrophages appears to be particularly important in the onset and progression of CVD. Venous stasis may lead to red blood cells (RBCs) extravasation in the surrounding tissues. Then, they are degraded by interstitial macrophages and released iron from RBCs are stored in form of ferritin to later produce haemosiderin, which is responsible for the limb pigmentation in patients with CVD [151]. This altered iron deposition in the tissue might have important consequences for individuals with venous disease, inducing and sustaining the pathological oxidative stress and inflammation, while leading to the progression of CVI and leg ulcers [152,153,154]. Thus, targeting pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages induced by iron is proposed as a potential therapy in the management of CVI and venous ulcerations [155]. On the other hand, neutrophils and mast cells appear to be the first cells to interact with the affected endothelium, being important to initiate the inflammatory response in patients with CVD [156]. In the context of CVD, the abnormal activity of neutrophils appears to be related to increased adhesion molecules, lysosomal enzymes, and superoxide production, playing a key role in the development of CVI [157,158,159]. Previous studies have noticed a reduced detection of activated neutrophils in the blood of patients with VV, in comparison to healthy subjects [160]. This was explained because of a phenomenon of “leukocyte trap”, which consists of the infiltration in the tissue of leukocytes and prominently, neutrophils through tiny vessels due to venous hypertension, hypoxia, and stasis [161]. Despite this fact, an increased neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is currently used as a marker of severity in CVD [162], thereby concluding the importance of this immune population in the pathophysiology of CVD. Conversely, the role of mast cells in the pathophysiology of CVD is unclear. Although some studies described a significant increase of mast cells in the VV wall [163], other studies did not find significant differences in mast cells populations in the wall of VV versus non-varicose [164]. Additionally, Kakkos et al. [165] reported an augmented infiltrate of mast cells in patients with family history of CVD compared to those without family history; therefore, concluding that mast cells infiltration might not be a consequence of venous hypertension. In this line, another recent study detected an infiltration of mast cells in thrombotic VV [166]. Although the role of mast cells in the pathophysiology of CVD have been evidenced, their precise implications are still undiscovered.
T lymphocytes are also crucial players of the inflammatory reaction occurring in the venous wall and valves of patients with CVD [167]. The role of T cells in vascular inflammation has been widely explored [168]. T cells could be divided into T helper (Th/T CD4+) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs/T CD8+). Th lymphocytes orchestrate immune responses according to the threat faced. They could be differentiated into various specific subsets, such as Th1, Th2, Th17 or T regulatory (Treg) cells, among others [169]. On the other side, CTLs are involved in effector cytotoxic functions [170]. The role of these T cell subsets has been extensively studied in arterial diseases, such as atherosclerosis [171]. However, to our knowledge, there are no studies regarding particular T cells subpopulations in the pathophysiology of CVD. Nonetheless, Ojdana et al. [172] demonstrated the participation of memory Th and CTL in the pathogenesis of CVD. Furthermore, B lymphocytes were also detected in the VV in comparison to healthy veins, although its precise role remains to be elucidated [173]. Grudzińska et al. [174] defined an increase of inflammatory cytokines released by lymphocytes in incompetent great saphenous veins with reflux in comparison to non-pathological blood flow. In this line, multiple studies have demonstrated the usefulness of studying cytokine signatures of patients with CVD. For instance, Lattimer et al. [175] showed increased levels of some proinflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) in blood samples from patients with VV. Although an exacerbated inflammation is found in patients with CVI, Guss et al. [176] reported that, in severe cases, the level of inflammatory cytokines are diminished, thereby hypothesizing that inflammatory cytokines might be involved in tissue repair rather than damage. Similarly, Howlader and Smith [177] did not find any correlation between inflammatory markers with patient symptoms, therefore indicating the intricate role of the cytokines in CVD pathophysiology. For instance, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) is a central molecule involved in multiple processes of CVD. The inflammatory environment associated to CVD, induce the activation and overproduction of TGF-β1. This factor acts as a critical modulator of different targets implicated in the ECM remodeling, eventually causing vascular wall fibrosis. In turn, this exacerbates the venous wall hypoxia, ECs damage, and inflammatory reactions, leading to a greater TGF-β1 activity [178]. However, TGF-β1 signaling appears to be blocked in later stages of CVD, as previous studies reported a significant decrease in the TGF-β receptors [179,180]. Conversely, Kowalewski et al. [181] reported an increase expression of TGF-β receptor II in VVs in comparison to normal veins. Thus, TGF-β and its receptors might be relevant during the early pathogenesis of CVD, although in advanced stages of the disease, its activity might be reduced. This signaling could have important implications for future therapies, evidencing the link between inflammation and ECM remodeling in CVD.
On the whole, the role of the immune system in the pathophysiology of CVD is quite complex and it results from the pathological venous pressure and hemodynamic changes, causing and responding to valve and venous wall damage. Similarly, it reacts over the affected endothelium, which initiates the recruitment and infiltration of immune cells. In turn, the proinflammatory environment created by immune cells appears to participate in the pathogenesis of the disease, conducting to endothelial dysfunction. However, it is also unclear the possible causative role of the immunological changes, which can conversely be the outcome (and not the cause) of venous stasis in CVD patients.

6.3. The Hypoxic Environment

Prolonged hypoxia is crucial to understand the development and progression of vascular diseases [182]. The cause of hypoxia in CVD is a reduced oxygen supply to the vascular wall. In the case of lower limbs veins, this event relies directly on special vessels designed as vasa vasorum, mainly located in the adventitia and tunica media layers [183]. In the context of CVD, venous hypertension and blood stasis may lead to two different mechanisms of hypoxia: (1) endoluminal hypoxia, mainly due to blood stagnation that results in reduced oxygen flow detected by the endothelium and inner layers of the vein wall and (2) medial hypoxia because of the compression of vasa vasorum as a reaction of venous dilation and increased pressure, affecting the medial and outer layer [184]. At molecular levels, hypoxia leads to the activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and 2α (HIF-1α and HIF-2α). An increased activation of both transcriptional factors and their related genes in VV compared to non-VV was demonstrated; hence, demonstrating the central role of hypoxia signaling in the pathophysiology of CVD [185].
Endoluminal hypoxia may bring two distinguished responses. Firstly, acute hypoxia triggers the release of inflammatory mediators and growth factors, initiating the recruitment of immune cells. Indeed, more leukocytes can adhere to ECs when incubated under hypoxic conditions [160]. Then long exposure to hypoxia leads to the activation of HIF, upregulating the expression of key genes, such as proinflammatory cytokines, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thereby increasing immune adhesion and recruitment in the VV [186]. Hypoxic signaling in this layer leads to intimal hyperplasia and degenerative changes in the inner wall, with a remarkable increase of the vasa vasorum as a compensatory mechanism to ensure an appropriate oxygen supply to the tunica media [187]. Nevertheless, progression of CVD entails an augmented hypoxic environment negatively affecting to SMCs. Xu et al. [188] demonstrated important phenotypical changes in SMCs from VV versus non-VV. They concluded that these cells showed increased proliferative and synthetic capacity in comparison to SMCs derived from normal veins, also being more dedifferentiated. Furthermore, these cells present a marked degeneration, losing its morphology, while increasing its phagocytic activity of either collagen or elastic fibers and even other SMCs [189]. In the same manner, due to endothelial activation, SMC migration from the medial to the inner layer has been demonstrated [190,191]. A strong cause of this abnormal behavior is the hypoxic environment. In this sense, we detected significant changes in hypoxic markers (HIF-1α, VEGF, TGF-β1, and eNOS) in cultured SMCs obtained from patients with VV under hypoxic conditions, observing a genetic and epigenetic reprogramming of these cells during CVD [192]. Moreover, in the case of sustained and long-term hypoxia, these cells showed a reduced expression of compensatory mechanisms to hypoxia, which may provoke, among other effects, an increased cellularity and hypertrophic areas, apoptosis dysregulation, and collagenization typically observed in the venous wall of patients with CVD [193,194].
Hypoxia is a major and detrimental characteristic of CVD, partly responsible for the pathophysiology in the affected veins at early, but particularly at late stages. Thus, studying oxygen supply in VV, as well as finding specific targets related to hypoxia and its signaling, appears to be an interesting and important approach in the management of CVD [184].

6.4. Molecular Basis of CVD: The Venous Wall Remodeling

In the venous wall, vascular cells possess different mechanoreceptors responsible for the blood flow, mainly flow-sensitive ion channels, G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and integrins, although the role of glycocalyx and the platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1/cadherin/VEGF receptor-2 complex in the mechanotransduction process should not be discarded [195]. Thus, the blood stasis and venous hypertension occurring during CVD will activate these receptors, triggering a wide variety of molecular responses in the ECs, SMCs, or vascular fibroblasts [196,197].
Firstly, shear stress will provoke important changes in the endothelium, leading to its dysfunction, as previously described. Simultaneously, a local response to the altered environment will be developed, with remarkable changes in the different layers. In this sense, significant changes in peptide growth factors and their receptors have been identified in the venous wall of patients with CVD, including acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF), VEGF, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and its receptor (IGF-1R) [198]. The last route appears to be particularly important in the venous wall of patients with CVD, where we have recently reported an altered homeostatic IGF-1/PAPPA/STC-2 axis [199]. TGF-β1 has also been related to the pathophysiology of CVD. Pascual et al. [200] described the important role of its dysregulation in the progression of CVD, particularly in the fibrous process of the venous wall. The effect of this factor appears to be mediated by the TGFβ receptor II, whose expression has also been upregulated in VVs, but downregulated in venous ulcers [181,201]. Conversely, Serralheiro et al. [179] denoted a decrease in the gene expression of TGF-β1 receptor II and III in advanced clinical stages of CVD. The expression of TGF-β1 is associated with the dysregulation of multiple products located in the ECM, including tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), metalloproteinases (MMPs), plasminogen activator inhibitor one (PAI-1), lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL-4), fibronectin, or collagen, among others, disrupting EC and SMC behavior [178]. Importantly, this molecule and its downstream signaling appears to play a critical role in the progression of CVD, linking inflammation, vascular damage, and venous wall remodeling. However, further studies are required in order to understand the precise role of TGF-β1 in CVD. The augmented detection of these growth factors and their receptors might lead to the dysregulation of various cellular routes contributing to the pathophysiology of CVD, such as PI3K/Akt. PI3K/Akt is an important route hyperactivated under pathological conditions inducing important changes in cell proliferation, survival, motility, metabolism and growth, among other effects [202]. Ortega et al. [203] studied the role of PI3K/Akt in 110 patients with CVD according to the presence or absence of valve reflux. They found an increased activation of these components in patients with venous reflux, therefore indicating the role of this route in the progression of the disease. Similarly, the MAP kinases (MAPKs) pathway is prominently hyperactivated in the venous wall of patients with reported reflux, which may indicate the synergic effect of both pathways [204]. Interestingly, either PI3K/Akt or MAPKs were significantly higher in younger patients (<50) in comparison to elder patients, which may indicate a possible role of PI3K/Akt in the accelerated aging of the venous wall. The increased aging of the venous wall is also favored by the loss of some homeostatic mechanisms in the venous wall. In this sense, some of the changes described in the homeostatic mechanisms in CVD included an altered expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), associated to an abnormal lysogenesis and senescence [205] and JNK signaling, with an accelerated osteogenesis [206].
Many elements from the extensive list that conforms the pathogenesis network in CVD are Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways. In SMCs from varicose saphenous vein, the observation was an impaired Ca2+ mobilization, implying reduced contractility [207]. For its part, the RhoA/Rho kinase signaling pathway, modulates Ca2+ sensitization to actin cytoskeleton and ECM fibronectin assembly in SMCs, but in VVs, both have decreased activity and deposition respectively [208]. Reduced expression of RhoA is associated to abnormal EC function and morphology, which depends on EGFL7 regulation by CASZ [209]. Mentioned variants from Nfact family are also Ca2+-dependent signals for development and function of T cells [210]. In related literature search, NFATC3, NFATC4, and other isoforms of Nfatc family may be also relevant as all of them coordinate tidily the tissues-vessels relationship in vasculature design [211]. Moreover, it is known that intravascular pressure induces nuclear accumulation of NFATC3 isoform in SMCs in event of nitric oxide synthase activation [212], an occurrence observed in patients with CVI [122,213]. Overall, the shear stress and environmental strains induced by CVD provoke an important cellular reprogramming that eventually leads to an altered cell senescence, ECM remodeling, and other significant changes in the venous wall.
Matrix Gla protein (MGP) has a prominent role in mineralization, which is boosted in SMCs of VVs [214]. This protein is a central inhibitor of vascular calcification via carboxylation by vitamin K although the accurate mechanism is not clearly understood [215]. It is suggested that MGP must be a predictor for calcification status of VV whose modus operandi can be expressed in different ways: inhibition of calcium phosphate precipitation, formation of matrix vesicles, formation of apoptotic bodies, and transdifferentiation of vascular SMCs [216]. For its part, MGP induces TGFβ expression and parallel, induces VEGFs expression, which promotes angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and vascular permeability. Some ex vivo studies have shown that by blocking TGFβ with antibodies, MGP does not have effect on VEGF upregulation [217]. As described, MGP, VEGF, cell–cell junctions and more elements depend on Ca2+ signaling, which is key for vascular tone and function to respond to hydrostatic pressure. It is known that the regulation of voltage dependent Ca2+ channels is altered with aging processes and hence affects vascular function [218]. Furthermore, some studies reported that primary VV show aberrant release of VEGF, which, in combination with other altered molecules, might increase the permeability of venous wall, allowing the infiltration of inflammation markers [219].
As reviewed above, rheological properties hold a relationship with venous wall now that there are histological differences between pathological and non-pathological veins, underlying the composition of ECM in venous remodeling. MMPs are secreted by fibroblasts and, when activated, they degrade collagen and elastin, which can affect other elements in vessel structure like SMCs migration. WBCs infiltration promotes an anomalous functioning of MMPs and TIMPs distinguishing zones with atrophy (little ECM) and hypertrophy (abundant ECM). The different levels of expression/activity of MMPs determine irregularity in VVs with dilated zones and tortuosity [220,221]. The dilation of vein due to hyperpolarization of K+ channels by MMP-2 was suggested by Raffetto et al. Since MMPs degrade collagen, peptides formed may attach to SMCs integrin receptors that entail the activation of K+ channels [222]. The changes in collagen, fibronectin, elastin, and calcium deposits establish the stiffening of vessels [223]. The deposition of certain collagen subtypes makes intimal and middle layers become thicker and, in general terms, collagen fibers increase while elastics decrease, contributing to the alteration of common orientation of SMCs [224]. For instance, type I collagen is expressed in bigger amount than III, in comparison to non-varicose veins [225]. Collagen III is involved in tissue elasticity, and the high collagen I:III ratio would also explain the low extensibility of VVs [226]. Moreover, elastin degradation, a critical event associated to an accelerated aging, generates products with cytokine-like activities, exerting chemotactic activity for leukocytes, especially polarizing towards Th1 subtypes [227]. The degradation of fibronectin is also bigger than its synthesis and deposition. This would also explain the long period of healing in typical CVD leg ulcers, now that fibronectin is synthesized by fibroblasts from skin, but the deposition is impaired [228].
Proteomics studies have elucidated the role of dermatopontin, and tenascin C, showing an increased proteolysis of these two factors in patients with VVs [229]. Firstly, dermatopontin is especially found in dermal fibroblasts, on the surface of collagen fibers, indicating a role in wound healing [230], and it increases the cellular response to TGFβ [231]. Secondly, tenascin C is an extracellular glycoprotein highly expressed in wound healing, is synthesized by SMCs in response to cell proliferation or migration [232]. Changes in both proteins could also play a vital role in the pathophysiology of CVD. Moreover, another protein that could be included in the complex network of multifactorial CVD is vinculin, a mechanosensory protein that takes part in endothelial cell-cell adhesion remodeling [233]. In any case, there is still a lack of knowledge related to these proteins and their participation in CVD pathogenesis.
Furthermore, the study of the glycome, the group of glycoconjugates united to lipids and proteins, unravels different glycosylation pathways in health and disease, becoming a prominent target for new advances towards therapy [234]. Glycosylation of ECM proteins affect to folding, solubility, binding, and degradation [235], and the accumulation of its end products increases the crosslinking of collagen. The crosslinking needs hydroxyproline amino acid to form hydrogen bonding in collagen molecules and this posttranslational modification affecting proline is highly represented in VVs, contributing to the stiffness of venous wall, aging, and inflammation.
As presented throughout the text, changes in biomechanical aspects alter the biochemical signaling pathways and these lead to changes in biophysical properties of venous wall, as summarized in Figure 4.

6.5. Genetics and Epigenetics Mechanisms of CVD

6.5.1. Genetics

In summary, literature research shows a high number of genes related to the etiology of CVD, contributing to the pathophysiology. Many of them are intronic variants polymorphisms or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), others are mutations, and the rest are just upregulated under CVD being related to systemic alterations. A wide variety of genes are listed, being associated to alterations in blood pressure, vascular wall remodeling, and impaired wall properties (tension and elasticity), besides typical inflammation of CVD. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) found much more variants at susceptibility loci with enough significance associated to CVD. Nevertheless, there are still few studies and peer reviewed articles related to CVD heritability and further efforts in this field are also needed.
In recent years, GWAS in VVs have allowed the identification of genetic risk factors previously unexplored. These findings showed some susceptibility SNPs for the genes of the pore-forming subunit KCNH8 (rs727139) (the potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 8) and the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein EFEMP1 (rs17278665). KCNH is involved in many functions including neuronal excitability and smooth muscle contraction, which is believed to be associated to venous dilation and VV formation [236]. EFEMP1 variants are related to MMPs and TIMPs altered expression, which leads to remodeling of ECM components and changes in vessel elasticity [237]. Another study found positive correlation between VV and polymorphisms in promoter region of MMP-9 and TIMP-2, which prevent excessive ECM [238].
More genetic analyses have been related to etiology and pathophysiology of CVD in terms of hypertension and abnormal vasculogenesis, revealing as causal genes: CASZ1, PIEZO1, PPP3R1, EBF1, STIM2, HFE, GATA2, NFATC2, and SOX9 [239]. CASZ1 (castor zinc finger 1) in its variant rs11121615 SNP has been found with strong association in severe CVD, but not in forms of this disease without VV. The transcription factor, CASZ1, directs the expression of EGFL7 (epidermal growth factor like-domain 7) that will lead to a signaling pathway concluding in angiogenesis stimulation and vascular assembly. A study settled that the variant rs11121615 for CASZ1 is influencing risk of developing VV [240]. For its part, PIEZO1 is a cationic channel that functions as a sensor of shear stress by Ca2+ influx among ECs, which is decisive factor for vascular structure. It is also permeable to Na+ and K+, functions as a baroreceptor and is necessary for valve morphogenesis and regulation of vascular tone [241] with consequences in circulation of lymph as well [242]. A mice model showed that Piezo1 can mediate blood flow and is followed by reorganization of ECs [243]. Loss-of-function mutations in this gene can cause autosomal recessive lymphatic dysplasia, a congenital disease that affects lymphatic system and edema in lower limbs [244]. Moreover, some variants have been associated particularly to VV recurrence, rs2911463 [43].
According to Shadrina et al., PPP3R1, EBF1, GATA2 and NFATC2 were genes associated to immune response or inflammation in vascular remodeling, a noted part related to VVs [239]. PPP3R1 (protein phosphatase 3 regulatory subunit B, alpha) associated variants, rs2861819 and rs2241173, have been studied as genetic determinants for CVD development, being involved in vascular integrity [33]. EBF1 (early b cell factor transcription factor 1) has a role in cell adhesion and migration during early B lymphopoiesis, being crucial for managing B cell immunity, and provides susceptibility to VV by its variant rs11135046 [245,246]. Next, the endothelial transcription factor GATA2 (GATA binding protein 2) can activate the transcription of genes involved in lymphatic vessel valve development, an impairment function correlated with lymphedema [247]. In this case, the associated variant of CVD risk found in GWAS was rs9880192 [239].
The role of NFATC2 (nuclear factor of activated T cells 2) in VV development has not been elucidated yet, but some variants have been found as well; the risk SNPs are rs3787184 and rs12625547 [246,248]. Nfatc signaling is calcineurin-dependent and acts in consonance with other transcription factor, FOXC2 (C2 isoform of the forkhead family transcription factor), in the regulation of GJC2, gap junction proteins of endothelial tissue. Mutations in genes FOXC2 and GJC2 are cause of disruption in venous valve function. Ulceration and hypertension will expound in absence of a proper valve control in which these genes are involved [249]. Moreover, animal models have shown that FOXC2 inactivation is correlated with abnormal shear stress sensing and junction disassembly due to cell-cell junction defects and valves impairment [250]. This problem has been studied in lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome that, as previously narrated, was associated to FOXC2 mutations.
Continuing with other possible targets, STIM2 (stromal interaction molecule 2) is an endoplasmic reticulum protein that controls Ca2+ concentration in cytosol and seems to be implicated in typical morbidity in aging, like autoimmune disorders [251]. GWAS studied proposed rs28558138 as risk SNPs [248]. HFE (homeostatic iron regulator) regulates iron absorption by regulating hepcidin expression. Recessive mutations confer hemochromatosis, a disorder of iron storage [252]. Iron overload is correlated with impaired endothelial function in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis [253]. On the other hand, in CVD, the RBCs extravasation and deposits of iron could highly activate MMPs or block their inhibitors, besides generating free radicals. The fact that iron could be an elicitor of venous leg ulcers has been hypothesized. In an observational study, patients with variant H63D (rs1799945) developed ulcers at an earlier age [254]. Another variant found in GWAS was rs7773004.
Next, SOX9 or SRY-box transcription factor 9, can modulate extracellular matrix, associated with high calcium deposition and its overexpression is influenced by TGF-β1 [255]. GWAS found variant rs2241173 for varicosity susceptibility. Gene COL2A1 (variant: rs73107980), which codes for collagen type II alpha 1 chain, component of extracellular matrix, is a target of SOX9 whose ectopic expression had previously been linked to abnormal modeling of extracellular matrix [239,256]. Presumably, the isotype COL1A2 has been studied in more depth, in collagen dysregulation. Genetic variations (insertion/deletion rs3917 polymorphism) seem to provide susceptibility to CVI [257].
In this extensive list, there are, finally, two genes (that were previously mentioned) that are an important link between thromboembolic disease and CVD: THBD and MTHFR. In this line, previous studies found that both conditions shared familial susceptibility [258]; hence, indicating the implication of some genetic mechanisms in the overlap of these diseases. Indeed, mutations in the two associated genes has been related to the development of either DVT or VV [43]. Blood samples obtained from VV exhibited higher levels of prothrombotic and inflammatory markers along with evidence of endothelial damage in comparison to non-VV blood [259]. These two genes could be taken part in the aberrant environment affecting the venous wall and the local response in the vein, connecting, to some extent, DVT and CVD pathophysiology. The main genes involved in the various pathophysiological mechanisms of CVD are summarized in Table 2.

6.5.2. Epigenetics

The term epigenetics refers to the different molecular mechanisms involved in the modulation of the genotype into a particular phenotype. Importantly, these changes do not usually affect directly DNA sequence, although they could be mitotically and meiotically hereditable [260]. In this sense, the epigenetic mechanisms are the following: (1) DNA methylation; (2) histone modifications, including acetylation/deacetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ribosylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, and citrullination; and (3) non-coding RNA, with a central role of micro RNAs (miRNA), short-interfering RNA (siRNA), and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) [261,262]. The epigenetic mechanisms are orchestrated by several external factors including aging, nutrition, behavior, psychological stress, physical activity, working habits, circadian rhythms, smoking, and alcohol consumption [37,263,264,265]. During cardiovascular diseases, all these components might promote an unfavorable environment that, along with the proper pathophysiological mechanisms, may lead to an epigenetic switch, thus contributing to the onset and progression of the disease [266]. In this line, shear stress represents one of the most important modulatory factors in ECs, initiating a wide variety of epigenetic responses [267]. Thus, an altered shear stress has been associated with the development of atherosclerosis [268]. In the same line, other mechanisms, such as hypoxia or inflammation, might induce the epigenetic reprogramming of the vascular cells, which in turn enhance the inflammatory and hypoxic responses [269,270].
Regarding genes regulated in CVD by epigenetic mechanisms, we will remark the role of two main pathways: DNA methylations and non-coding RNAs. DNA methylation consist of the adding of a CH3 group in the CpG sites in a process mediated by the methyltransferases enzymes [271]. DNA could be hypermethylated or hypomethylated, depending on the activity of the methyltransferases. Hypermethylation cause the silencing of the gene while hypomethylation leads to its activation [272]. Importantly, either hypermethylated or hypomethylated patterns could be detected in different loci under pathological conditions [273]. In the context of CVD, the above mentioned EBF1 and MTHFR act as critical gene modulators. EBF1 may be considered as an epigenetic regulator now that it can induce DNA demethylation, nucleosome modeling and modulate active chromatin of B cell gene networks [274]. In the case of MTHFR, previous research observed that certain polymorphic variants appear to induce DNA hypomethylation, thus leading to an abnormal expression of matrix and structural proteins, affecting DNA integrity and accelerated aging of the venous tissue [275]. Importantly, MTHFR mutations were associated with inherited hypercoagulability, as well as an increased risk of suffering from CVD and DVT [276].
In this line, transcriptomic and DNA-methylomic studies have identified microfibril associated protein 5 (MFAP5) as a gene hyperactivated in patients with VVs due to an increased hypomethylation [277]. In addition, other genes, such as ADCY3, DPEP2, HRC, PLXNB1, osteopontin, integrin β3 and CCN5 (WISP2) are importantly dysregulated in VVs, due to an altered methylation patterns also being linked to the signaling network of CVD [247,278]. However, further research is required in this field to establish the causes of these methylation disturbances.
Likewise, the role of non-coding RNAs in the pathophysiology of CVD has received more attention. Non-coding RNAs are RNAs without coding potential but playing multiple functions in biological and pathological processes [279]. In this context, miRNAs represent one of the most important non-coding RNAs, preventing protein expression acting at post-transcriptional levels. miRNAs could be upregulated or downregulated, thereby exerting their action or not in the corresponding product [280]. A single miRNA may regulate, on average, 200 transcripts and a single transcript could be regulated by different miRNAs [281]. In addition, miRNAs could be used as valuable biomarkers of disease, with important implications for diagnosis and prognosis for the patient [282]. Available studies of miRNAs in CVD are conducted mainly in the VV tissue, with important pathophysiological implications. In this sense, Jiang et al. [280] detected 14 miRNAs abnormally expressed in the VV tissue. Particularly, miR-34a, miR-155 and miR-202 appears to be the most significative components in these patients. Among the most important targets of these miRNAs were MAPKs, hyperproliferative targets, apoptotic genes, cell cycle, and p53 signaling pathways. In the same manner, Anwar et al. [283] reported altered levels of miR-642a-3p, miR-4459, miR-135a-3p, and miR-216a-5p, in the vein tissue of patients with CVD, being correlated with an altered metabolomic profile, increased proliferation and inflammation. MiR-382 appears to be a key regulator of the gene COL1A2. However, in patients with the polymorphic variant rs3917 the affinity of this miRNA with this gene product decreases, hence leading to the upregulation of COL1A2 [264]. More detailed, Zalewski et al. [284] described 31 miRNAs and 62 genes recognized as potential biomarkers of CVD. These miRNAs established a complex network leading to the upregulation of certain genes like WNK1, PRRC2B, CDS2, and the histone deacetylase HDAC5, while downregulating other targets (e.g., PABPC3). All of these interactions enhance the pathophysiological mechanisms of CVD, therefore showing the promising role of miRNAs in this condition. Respecting other non-coding RNAs like lncRNA, previous research has demonstrated the important role of these components both at physiological and pathological conditions [285]. LncRNAs similar to miRNAs are able to regulate protein expression, acting through different mechanisms either in the nucleus or cytoplasm. In the case of CVD, lncRNAs also play a vital function in the pathophysiology of the disease, influencing a plethora of genes involved in the development of CVD, mainly through metabolic, structural, and inflammatory mechanisms, among others [286,287]. Despite the relevance of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of CVD further studies are needed to deepen on the pathological role of these elements. Moreover, to our knowledge there are no studies regarding the use of non-coding miRNAs as diagnostic or prognostic factors of CVD, and future efforts could be placed on this direction.
Finally, it is important to highlight that epigenetic mechanisms are reversible, as well as contribute to the development and progression of CVD, it might act favorably by modulating certain factors, such as diet, physical activity, emotional management, and rest while limiting alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking.

6.6. Systemic Affections

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that CVD is not only a local disease, but also a systemic malady, with detrimental implications for the whole organism. Contrary to popular beliefs and as reviewed throughout the study, the presence of VV is much more than an esthetic concern, but also a worrisome condition with many symptoms and signs, entailing devastating consequences in the QOL of the patients [2]. In this sense, it is known that individuals with CVD present a disrupted serum levels of many compounds including proinflammatory cytokines [176], circulating parameters (prominently estradiol, homocysteine, and VEGF) [288], oxidative stress indicators [122] and epigenetic markers [285]. In addition, much of these agents increase at advanced stages of CVD, therefore suggesting the systemic implications of the disease.
Moreover, these effects could be even greater in the most vulnerable populations, like PW. As above mentioned, this group is particularly susceptible to suffer from CVD. In this sense, we conducted multiple studies regarding the impact of this condition during gestation in comparison to healthy pregnancies. The placenta is a crucial organ during pregnancy, involved in multiple functions, providing oxygen and blood supply to the fetus, among other functions [289]. Thus, a proper working of the placenta is key to determine pregnancy success and fetal well-being. Conversely, impairment in the placental function and abnormalities on its structure during pregnancy could enhance fetal reprogramming, which may negatively impact, even in adulthood [290,291]. In this context, we have reported significant changes in the placentas of women with CVD, showing increased damage and hypoxia [292], villous calcifications [293], altered lipidomic profile [294], augmented angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis [295], ECM remodeling [296], and evidence of oxidative damage, in either the mother or fetus [297]. Importantly, many of these changes have also been reported in the placentas of patients with pre-eclampsia, a hypertensive disorder affecting the arterial system [298]. Although contrary to gestational venous hypertension, pre-eclampsia could be a severe and life-threatening condition, our results show the CVD course, with significant changes in the placenta of PW affected with this condition, and the necessity of further studies to assess the impact of the disease, in both fetal and maternal well-being.

7. Therapeutical Approaches in CVD

The medical care of CVD entails different strategies that can be used either alone or in combination, in order to maximize the clinical management of the symptomatology, prognosis and therefore the QOL of patients. In this sense, three main approaches are worth mentioning here: (a) compression therapies, targeting venous hemodynamics; (b) medical interventions directed to control venous insufficiency, and (c) pharmacological therapies directed to specific pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease [299]. It is of note that elder people and patients with additional comorbidities, despite requiring more interventions, are good responders to the different therapies received as younger patients or patients without any affection [300]. Thus, the entire population affected by CVD might be beneficiary from available therapies.
Compression therapy act by increasing the interstitial pressure, thus decreasing both the superficial and the deep veins caliber, reducing venous pressure and edema while promoting the contractile activity of the calf muscles [301]. Compression stockings are easy to use, and frequently, they are the first conservative measure to take, achieving significant improvements in most patients without causing much discomfort [302]. Thigh length stockings provide the greatest efficacy regarding volume reduction and venous hemodynamic, without affecting patient comfort [303]. In addition, compression stockings favor the healing of ulcers associated to CVI; hence, decreasing the recurrence of ulcerations in venous diseases after surgical intervention [304]. However, the usefulness of compression therapy after VV treatment has a limited degree of evidence [305,306]. Even so, it must be considered that patients with peripheral arterial disease require a careful application of this particular treatment, as it might interfere with blood circulation in the lower limb and worsen the underlying disease. Therefore, the ankle-brachial index should be calculated to discard arterial involvement, which would contraindicate the use of compression stockings in specific patients [307].
Similarly, CVD can be treated pharmacologically through various venoactive agents. These compounds aim to decrease vascular permeability, ameliorating the inflammatory response and, to some extent, they may increase vascular tone and operate on platelet aggregation [47]. Pharmacological treatments range from saponins, flavonoids, pentoxifylline, micronized purified fractions of flavonoids, and acetylsalicylic acid [308]. The main applications of these pharmacological agents are guided to treat non-serious symptoms like pain or edema at initial stages. In addition, a moderate level of evidence also supports their use in some clinical signs of CVI including trophic disorders, cramps, restless legs, swelling, and paresthesia, but its efficacy in venous ulcerations is inconsistent [309]. Nevertheless, certain drugs, such as sulodexide or purified flavonoids, appears to play a promising role in the management of CVI and venous ulcers, particularly when combined with compression therapy [310,311]. In the event of patients with refractory ulcers, acetylsalicylic acid could be utilized under some cautions [14,312]. However, some authors question the usefulness of the pharmacological therapy in the management of patients with CVD, claiming for further studies to unravel the real position of these drugs [313]. Anticoagulants play a specific role in a few venous diseases, such as DVT, SVT, PE, and they have been proposed in other cases of CVD, such as PTS and venous ulcerations [37].
It should be emphasized that different technologies and surgical approaches have been validated as interventional treatments in the management of CVD. The rationale of this type of treatment relies on the effective control, either of the localized progression at early stages of the disease, or on the prevention of long-term complications, also targeting optimal cosmetic results [314].
Varicose vein treatment is the most practiced interventional approach in CVD patients. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is one of the best-known procedures in the management of VV of the lower limbs. Sclerotherapy is based on the use of different chemical agents (polidocanol, sodium tetradecyl sulfate, glycerin, etc.) to ablate veins, venules, and in general, any type of varicose manifestation in patients with CVD [315]. This therapy is indicated especially, but not only, in patients with baseline comorbidities, where more aggressive techniques could be contraindicated [316]. Moreover, sclerotherapy can be an alternative to other procedures in patients with advanced CVI and saphenous vein incompetence who are not candidates for surgery or endovenous techniques [317]. The results of sclerotherapy are similar to other interventional techniques, properly managing the associated symptoms of CVD with a low rate of adverse effects [318]. Moreover, sclerotherapy has provided substantial benefits for patients with superficial venous reflux, enhancing ulcer healing and preventing recurrences in similar rates than other procedures [319]. More recently, sclerosant foam-based and catheter-based procedures have proven to achieve outcomes in the range of thermal ablation techniques at mid-term [37]. However, most trials show similar results for all VV therapies, in regard to patient-reported outcomes.
As to open surgery (saphenous junction ligation and stripping) in VV disease, conflicting data exist [37] in terms of mid-long term recurrence; some literature data report on a superior efficacy to medical and conservative approaches to resolve the symptoms associated with VV [320,321]. Before the introduction of the endovenous thermal or chemical ablation interventions, surgery was considered the gold standard for the treatment of CVI for a long time [322]. However, because of its invasiveness, the higher rate of potential complications, including the appearance of hematomas, infections on the surgical wound or nerve injury, the surgical approach is usually reserved to patients with large and tortuous dilations in superficial VVs or patients with some vascular malformations [323].Because of that, nowadays, ultrasound-guided endovenous ablation has replaced previous techniques used in the field of CVD. Two different types of endovenous thermal ablation can be distinguished: endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Both techniques are based on the induction of a controlled thermal injury at the VV level, leading to a thrombotic occlusion eventually causing fibrosis of the saphenous vein [324,325]. This technique has now replaced surgical intervention because it offers similar results with less convalescence and a very low rate of complications [326,327]. Serious complications are rare and include DVT and SVT, pigmentary changes, nerve damage.
More recently cyanoacrylate-based options have been validated as alternative techniques in VV treatment, though the cost/effectiveness ratio may be unfavorable in many cases [37].
Finally, there are certain therapeutic alternatives reserved for deep vein occlusions/obstructions in acute DVT or in PTS, as it is the case of the endovenous PTA + stent. The use of stent in patients with CVD is indicated in presence of chronic iliac vein occlusions which are non-responders to medical interventions [328]. Conclusively, as presented in Table 3, we can observe that CVD has an amalgam of possible therapeutic approaches, which may be used to improve or alleviate the clinical manifestations of this debilitating disease.

8. Future Directions in CVD—Towards Clinical and Translational Improvements

CVD is a multifactorial disease that generates a huge economic burden, besides the impact on patient QOL, demanding extensive treatment and sometimes hospitalization. Given the rising prevalence, these days CVD is still an underestimated and underdiagnosed malady. For this reason, scientific evidence and clinical management must fulfill the duty of achieving enough knowledge to engender practical guidelines, in order to restore normalcy for these patients and diminish healthcare costs.
Medical technologies are supporting the optimization of current treatments. One of the most used, foam sclerotherapy, may benefit patients for some 5 years [329], though a higher success rate is reported with complementary techniques, such as catheter foam sclerotherapy with tumescence and irrigation [37]. For its part, tissue engineering is facing approaches in valve development for replacement, finding adequate materials to reach desired outcomes [330]. In the diagnosis area, new ultrasound technologies are more sophisticated and effective, enabling to reach better visualizations of blood flow, and diameter and compressibility in veins, which could provide an earlier diagnostic [331]. Moreover, further molecular research is required for a better understanding of CVD pathogenesis, especially in the field of epigenetics, which would allow to treat each case individually. Precision medicine based on miRNAs and DNA changes could be used as prognostic biomarkers and for earlier diagnosis too.
Nevertheless, we ought to considerate that prevention is better than cure. The burden of inheritance in the CVD represents only ~17%, which means that the remaining 83% can be modulated in order to avoid its manifestation. In this line, nutrition intervention and physical exercise programs are the two most cost-effective feasible lifestyle factors to promote health and independence. Both hold enough evidence to verify their ability to reduce oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory markers.
It is undeniable that the rising results of interventional studies related to adherence to a Mediterranean diet demonstrate the cardioprotective effects and anti-inflammatory properties on individual’s health. A well-balanced low-carb diet with plenty of fiber, vitamins, polyphenols, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) satisfy the well-functioning of the immune system. On the contrary, Westernized diets denote a lack of micronutrients that lead to malnourishment and impaired immune competence associated to the origin of chronic diseases, such as CVD, obesity, cardiovascular, type 2 diabetes, or some types of cancer [332]. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that old adults with chronic venous leg ulcers present some worrisome markers of malnutrition, with high plasma levels of n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio, and low consumption of vitamins and fiber, accompanied by high saturated fat and sugar consumption [333]. There is a need to include dietary and lifestyle interventions in medical guidelines, which would improve the success of pharmacological treatment as well [37].
Furthermore, in order to reduce symptoms of CVD, some physical exercise trials have already been performed. Physical conditioning of CVD patients has defied the impaired calf muscle pump to handle patient disability and decreased exercise capacity [334], showing improved muscle hemodynamics and function [335]. A six-month program of structured exercise in patients with CEAP 4, 5, or 6 was demonstrated to improve calf muscle pump strength [336]. With the aid of compression therapy, exercise has also shown promising results in microvascular changes in the process of venous leg ulcer healing in CVI patients [337]. In any case, a more comprehensive and integrated approach should be advocated to target a series of epigenetic factors, which undoubtedly affect CVD onset and course.
Additionally, age represents one of the main risk factors to suffer from CVD. Life expectancy has significantly increased; however, quantity does not seem to imply QOL now that the rising morbidities are a threat to society and the economy as well [338]. Longevity and physical status, conditioned by obesity and sedentariness, are the main risk factors for the increasing incidence of CVI in elderly [37,339]. Malnutrition is also a common condition in the elderly, associated with sarcopenia and frailty, and these correlate with higher rates of mortality and longer hospital stays. Evidence alleges that strategies, such as routine screening of nutritional status, would provide, again, earlier diagnostics [340]. Nevertheless, sooner nutrition care, routinely, and lifestyle modifications would ameliorate prognosis in cases of age-related diseases [341]. This is one of the hallmarks in science targeting healthy aging.
In the same manner, due to overweight conditions and inflammatory status—pregnant women are another group to carefully watch. The existing possibility of developing CVI during pregnancy implies placental damage induced by oxidative stress [297] and the impact of this stress on epigenetic patterns can be determinant for the occurrence of vascular diseases in the offspring, even in adulthood [342]. Nutritional intervention during this period, together with tailored physical exercise may help to reprogram epigenetic mechanisms for the health status of the mother and future newborn.
We should also note that chronic diseases, such as CVD, implying overweight, pain, and morbidities impeding self-independence, are causes of high prevalence of depression and other mood disorders [63]. These reasons, together with psychological affections and disturbed QOL, entail a high number of medical sick leaves. It would be fruitful to remind the population about the importance of self-application of good habits, encouraging them from childhood. In this context, investment in prevention would play a prominent role, for instance, incorporating programs of adequate nutrition, psychological support, and physical exercise in education, and in medical assessment. These future directions, herein discussed, are summarized in Figure 5.

9. Conclusions

CVD is a progressive and disabling condition widely represented in the global population. Prolonged exposure to genetic and environmental risk factors may lead to important biophysical and biochemical changes in the venous system, entailing a complex vascular response. A growing number of studies, focusing on CVD, evidence the relevance of this vascular pathology, prominently in most advanced stages (CVI) [1,2,3]. Herein, we collected some of the most relevant data on such an intricate topic, with special emphasis on the pathophysiological and medical perceptions of the disease. Additional studies are needed in order to obtain further understanding of CVD, exploring novel translational and medical approaches to improve the QOL of these patients. Finally, society should be aware of the real impact of the disease, and attempt to adopt measures to prevent the development and/or progression of CVD to CVI (e.g., by increasing physical activity or through nutrition and lifestyle interventions). An integrative perspective of this condition would bring immediate benefits to the clinical management of these patients, particularly for the most vulnerable groups, such as elder people, individuals with extra comorbidities, and pregnant women.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.O., M.Á.-M. and J.B.; methodology, M.A.O., O.F.-M. and C.G.-M.; software, M.A.O., O.F.-M. and C.G.-M.; validation, M.Á.-M. and J.B.; formal analysis, M.A.O., O.F.-M. and C.G.-M.; investigation, M.A.O., O.F.-M., C.G.-M., M.A.Á.-M., C.C., F.R.-G., L.P., J.M., A.A., N.G.-H., M.Á.-M. and J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.O., O.F.-M., C.G.-M., M.A.Á.-M., L.P., M.Á.-M. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, M.A.O., O.F.-M., C.G.-M., M.Á.-M. and J.B.; supervision, M.Á.-M. and J.B.; project administration, M.A.O., M.Á.-M. and J.B.; funding acquisition, M.Á.-M. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigación de la Seguridad Social, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/01726), Spain, Programa de Actividades de I+D de la Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina (B2017/BMD3804), and Halekulani S.L.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Oscar Fraile-Martinez had a predoctoral fellowship from the University of Alcalá during the course of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nicolaides, A.N.; Labropoulos, N. Burden and Suffering in Chronic Venous Disease. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davies, A.H. The Seriousness of Chronic Venous Disease: A Review of Real-World Evidence. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ligi, D.; Croce, L.; Mannello, F. Chronic venous disorders: The dangerous, the good, and the diverse. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eklof, B.; Perrin, M.; Delis, K.T.; Rutherford, R.B.; Gloviczki, P. Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: The VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 49, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Piazza, G. Varicose veins. Circulation 2014, 130, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Youn, Y.J.; Lee, J. Chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins of the lower extremities. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2019, 34, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tucker, W.D.; Mahajan, K. Anatomy, Blood Vessels; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacobs, B.N.; Andraska, E.A.; Obi, A.T.; Wakefield, T.W. Pathophysiology of varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2017, 5, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tansey, E.A.; Montgomery, L.E.A.; Quinn, J.G.; Roe, S.M.; Johnson, C.D. Understanding basic vein physiology and venous blood pressure through simple physical assessments. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2019, 43, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Recek, C. Calf pump activity influencing venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity. Int. J. Angiol. 2013, 22, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uhl, J.F.; Gillot, C. Anatomy of the veno-muscular pumps of the lower limb. Phlebology 2015, 30, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raetz, J.; Wilson, M.; Collins, K. Varicose Veins: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am. Fam. Physicians 2019, 99, 682–688. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sukhovatykh, B.S.; Sukhovatykh, M.B. Perforating veins insufficiency in patients with varicose disease. Khirurgiia Mosk 2015, 5, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nicolaides, A.; Kakkos, S.; Baekgaard, N.; Comerota, A.; de Maeseneer, M.; Eklof, B.; Giannoukas, A.D.; Lugli, M.; Maleti, O.; Myers, K.; et al. Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs Guidelines According to Scientific Evidence PART I. Int. Angiol. 2018, 37, 181–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hyder, O.N.; Soukas, P.A. Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Novel Management Strategies for an Under-diagnosed Disease Process. Rhode Isl. Med. J. 2017, 100, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moura, R.M.F.; Gonçalves, G.S.; Navarro, T.P.; Britto, R.R.; Dias, R.C. Relationship between quality of life and the ceap clinical classification in chronic venous disease. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2010, 14, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carman, T.L.; Al-Omari, A. Evaluation and Management of Chronic Venous Disease Using the Foundation of CEAP. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2019, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Santler, B.; Goerge, T. Chronic venous insufficiency—A review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. JDDG J. Dtsch. Soc. Dermatol. 2017, 15, 538–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zolotukhin, I.A.; Seliverstov, E.I.; Shevtsov, Y.N.; Avakiants, I.P.; Nikishkov, A.S.; Tatarintsev, A.M.; Kirienko, A.I. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Chronic Venous Disease in the General Russian Population. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017, 54, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beebe-Dimmer, J.L.; Pfeifer, J.R.; Engle, J.S.; Schottenfeld, D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann. Epidemiol. 2005, 15, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rabe, E.; Guex, J.J.; Puskas, A.; Scuderi, A.; Fernandez Quesada, F.; Coordinators, V. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: Results from the Vein Consult Program. Int. Angiol. J. Int. Union Angiol. 2012, 31, 105–115. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salim, S.; Machin, M.; Patterson, B.O.; Onida, S.; Davies, A.H. Global Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review with Pooled Prevalence Analysis. Ann. Surg. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rabe, E.; Berboth, G.; Pannier, F. Epidemiology of chronic venous diseases. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2016, 166, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brand, F.N.; Dannenberg, A.L.; Abbott, R.D.; Kannel, W.B. The epidemiology of varicose veins: The Framingham Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 1988, 4, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vuylsteke, M.E.; Thomis, S.; Guillaume, G.; Modliszewski, M.L.; Weides, N.; Staelens, I. Epidemiological study on chronic venous disease in Belgium and Luxembourg: Prevalence, risk factors, and symptomatology. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015, 49, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pannier, F.; Rabe, E. The relevance of the natural history of varicose veins and refunded care. Phlebology 2012, 27, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, Y.; Png, C.Y.M.; Sumpio, B.J.; DeCarlo, C.S.; Dua, A. Defining the human and health care costs of chronic venous insufficiency. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 34, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, A.J.; Robertson, L.A.; Boghossian, S.M.; Allan, P.L.; Ruckley, C.V.; Fowkes, F.G.; Evans, C.J. Progression of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in the general population in the Edinburgh Vein Study. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2015, 3, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vuylsteke, M.E.; Colman, R.; Thomis, S.; Guillaume, G.; Van Quickenborne, D.; Staelens, I. An Epidemiological Survey of Venous Disease Among General Practitioner Attendees in Different Geographical Regions on the Globe: The Final Results of the Vein Consult Program. Angiology 2018, 69, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Musil, D.; Kaletova, M.; Herman, J. Age, body mass index and severity of primary chronic venous disease. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky. Olomouc. Czech Repub. 2011, 155, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vuylsteke, M.E.; Colman, R.; Thomis, S.; Guillaume, G.; Degrande, E.; Staelens, I. The influence of age and gender on venous symptomatology. An epidemiological survey in Belgium and Luxembourg. Phlebology 2016, 31, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lohr, J.M.; Bush, R.L. Venous disease in women: Epidemiology, manifestations, and treatment. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 57, 37S–45S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ortega, M.A.; Sánchez-Trujillo, L.; Bravo, C.; Fraile-Martinez, O.; García-Montero, C.; Saez, M.A.; Alvarez-Mon, M.A.; Sainz, F.; Alvarez-Mon, M.; Bujan, J.; et al. Newborns of Mothers with Venous Disease during Pregnancy Show Increased Levels of Lipid Peroxidation and Markers of Oxidative Stress and Hypoxia in the Umbilical Cord. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cornu-Thenard, A.; Boivin, P. Chronic venous disease during pregnancy—Servier—PhlebolymphologyServier—Phlebolymphology. Phlebolymphology 2014, 21, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vlajinac, H.D.; Marinkovic, J.M.; Maksimovic, M.Z.; Matic, P.A.; Radak, D.J. Body mass index and primary chronic venous disease—A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2013, 45, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Patel, J.; Shah, P.; Gandhi, F. A study of chronic venous insufficiency in relation with body mass index and diameter of saphenofemoral junction and great saphenous vein. Indian J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cavezzi, A. Medicine and Phlebolymphology: Time to Change? J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jones, W.S.; Vemulapalli, S.; Parikh, K.S.; Coeytaux, R.R.; Crowley, M.J.; Raitz, G.; Johnston, A.L.; Hasselblad, V.; McBroom, A.J.; Lallinger, K.R.; et al. Treatment Strategies for Patients with Lower Extremity Chronic Venous Disease (LECVD); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sudoł-Szopińska, I.; Bogdan, A.; Szopiński, T.; Panorska, A.K.; Kołodziejczak, M. Prevalence of chronic venous disorders among employees working in prolonged sitting and standing postures. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2011, 17, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, S.; Vashist, M.; Vashist, M.G. EJBPS|Family History as Major Predisposing Factor in Varicose Veins Disorder. Eur. J. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 73, 392–396. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vlajinac, H.D.; Radak, D.J.; Marinković, J.M.; Maksimović, M.Ž. Risk factors for chronic venous disease. Phlebology 2012, 27, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kondo, T.; Nakano, Y.; Adachi, S.; Murohara, T. Effects of Tobacco Smoking on Cardiovascular Disease. Circ. J. 2019, 83, 1980–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fukaya, E.; Flores, A.M.; Lindholm, D.; Gustafsson, S.; Zanetti, D.; Ingelsson, E.; Leeper, N.J. Clinical and genetic determinants of varicose veins: Prospective, community-based study of ≈500,000 individuals. Circulation 2018, 138, 2869–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spácil, J. Does body height affect the severity of chronic venous disease in lower extremities? Vnitr. Lek. 2015, 61, 202–206. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rabe, E.; Pannier, F. Clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological classification (CEAP): Gold standard and limits. Phlebology 2012, 27, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sinabulya, H.; Holmberg, A.; Blomgren, L. Interobserver variability in the assessment of the clinical severity of superficial venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2015, 30, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Castro-Ferreira, R.; Cardoso, R.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Mansilha, A. The Role of Endothelial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Chronic Venous Disease. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 46, 380–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nakano, L.C.U.; Cacione, D.G.; Baptista-Silva, J.C.C.; Flumignan, R.L.G. Treatment for telangiectasias and reticular veins. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Imbernón-Moya, A.; Ortiz-de Frutos, F.J.; Sanjuan-Alvarez, M.; Portero-Sanchez, I. Chronic venous disease of legs. Med. Clin. 2017, 148, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Trayes, K.P.; Studdiford, J.S.; Pickle, S.; Tully, A.S. Edema: Diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Physician 2013, 88, 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shaydakov, M.E.; Comerota, A.J.; Lurie, F. Primary venous insufficiency increases risk of deep vein thrombosis. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2016, 4, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Clement, D.L. Superficial vein thrombosis: More dangerous than anticipated. Phlebolymphology 2013, 20, 188–192. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gilbert, J.D.; Byard, R.W. Ruptured varicose veins and fatal hemorrhage. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2018, 14, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nicolaides, A.N. The Most Severe Stage of Chronic Venous Disease: An Update on the Management of Patients with Venous Leg Ulcers. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Middleton, H. Exploring the aetiology and management of venous eczema. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2007, 12, S16–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Caggiati, A.; Rosi, C.; Franceschini, M.; Innocenzi, D. The nature of skin pigmentations in chronic venous insufficiency: A preliminary report. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2008, 35, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Choonhakarn, C.; Chaowattanapanit, S.; Julanon, N. Lipodermatosclerosis: A clinicopathologic correlation. Int. J. Dermatol. 2016, 55, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Uhl, J.F.; Cornu-Thenard, A.; Satger, B.; Carpentier, P.H. Clinical analysis of the corona phlebectatica. J. Vasc. Surg. 2012, 55, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dean, S.M. Cutaneous Manifestations of Chronic Vascular Disease. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 60, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Senet, P.; Combemale, P.; Debure, C.; Baudot, N.; Machet, L.; Aout, M.; Vicaut, E.; Lok, C. Malignancy and chronic leg ulcers: The value of systematic wound biopsies: A prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study. Arch. Dermatol. 2012, 148, 704–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paul, J.C.; Pieper, B.; Templin, T.N. Itch: Association with chronic venous disease, pain, and quality of life. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2011, 38, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jafferany, M.; Pastolero, P. Psychiatric and Psychological Impact of Chronic Skin Disease. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018, 20, 17nr02247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sritharan, K.; Lane, T.R.A.; Davies, A.H. The burden of depression in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012, 43, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Blättler, W.; Mendoza, E.; Zollmann, C.; Bendix, J.; Amsler, F. Homeostatic feelings—A novel explanation of vein symptoms derived from an experimental patient study. Vasa Eur. J. Vasc. Med. 2019, 48, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Surmeli, M.; Ozdemir, O.C. Quality of Life in Venous Diseases of the Lower Limbs, Well-Being and Quality of Life—Medical Perspective; InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, Z.; Ma, Y. A narrative review of the quality of life scales specific for chronic venous diseases. Medicine 2021, 100, e25921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Darvall, K.A.L.; Bate, G.R.; Adam, D.J.; Bradbury, A.W. Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012, 44, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Barstow, C.; Kassop, D. Cardiovascular Disease: Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins. FP Essent. 2019, 479, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gloviczki, P.; Comerota, A.J.; Dalsing, M.C.; Eklof, B.G.; Gillespie, D.L.; Gloviczki, M.L.; Lohr, J.M.; McLafferty, R.B.; Meissner, M.H.; Murad, M.H.; et al. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J. Vasc. Surg. 2011, 53, 2S–48S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Eberhardt, R.T.; Raffetto, J.D. Chronic venous insufficiency. Circulation 2014, 130, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Necas, M. Duplex ultrasound in the assessment of lower extremity venous insufficiency. Australas. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010, 13, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ruckley, C.V.; Evans, C.J.; Allan, P.L.; Lee, A.J.; Fowkes, F.G.R. Chronic venous insufficiency: Clinical and duplex correlations. The Edinburgh Vein Study of venous disorders in the general population. J. Vasc. Surg. 2002, 36, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Khilnani, N.M. Duplex ultrasound evaluation of patients with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 202, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Szary, C.; Wilczko, J.; Plucinska, D.; Pachuta, A.; Napierala, M.; Bodziony, A.; Zawadzki, M.; Grzela, T. The Number of Pregnancies and Deliveries and Their Association with Selected Morphological and Hemodynamic Parameters of the Pelvic and Abdominal Venous System. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dezotti, N.R.A.; Dalio, M.B.; Ribeiro, M.S.; Piccinato, C.E.; Joviliano, E.E. The clinical importance of air plethysmography in the assessment of chronic venous disease. J. Vasc. Bras. 2016, 15, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Min, S.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, Y.J.; Lee, W.; Jung, I.M.; Lee, T.; Ha, J.; Kim, S.J. Role of three-dimensional computed tomography venography as a powerful navigator for varicose vein surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 2010, 51, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lurie, F.; Passman, M.; Meisner, M.; Dalsing, M.; Masuda, E.; Welch, H.; Bush, R.L.; Blebea, J.; Carpentier, P.H.; De Maeseneer, M.; et al. The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2020, 8, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Meissner, M.H.; Gloviczki, P.; Bergan, J.; Kistner, R.L.; Morrison, N.; Pannier, F.; Pappas, P.J.; Rabe, E.; Raju, S.; Villavicencio, J.L. Primary chronic venous disorders. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Labropoulos, N.; Kang, S.S.; Mansour, M.A.; Giannoukas, A.D.; Buckman, J.; Baker, W.H. Primary superficial vein reflux with competent saphenous trunk. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 1999, 18, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Labropoulos, N.; Tiongson, J.; Pryor, L.; Tassiopoulos, A.K.; Kang, S.S.; Mansour, M.A.; Baker, W.H. Nonsaphenous superficial vein reflux. J. Vasc. Surg. 2001, 34, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bergan, J.J.; Pascarella, L.; Schmid-Schönbein, G.W. Pathogenesis of primary chronic venous disease: Insights from animal models of venous hypertension. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008, 47, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fiebig, A.; Krusche, P.; Wolf, A.; Krawczak, M.; Timm, B.; Nikolaus, S.; Frings, N.; Schreiber, S. Heritability of chronic venous disease. Hum. Genet. 2010, 127, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jawien, A. The influence of environmental factors in chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology 2003, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saharay, M.; Shields, D.A.; Georgiannos, S.N.; Porter, J.B.; Scurr, J.H.; Coleridge Smith, P.D. Endothelial activation in patients with chronic venous disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 1998, 15, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bass, A. The effect of standing in the workplace and the development of chronic venous insufficiency. Harefuah 2007, 146, 675–676. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Ropacka-Lesiak, M.; Kasperczak, J.; Breborowicz, G.H. Risk factors for the development of venous insufficiency of the lower limbs during pregnancy—Part 1. Ginekol. Pol. 2012, 83, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. García-Honduvilla, N.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Ortega, M.A.; Sainz, F.; Leal, J.; Lopez-Hervas, P.; Pascual, G.; Buján, J. Increase and Redistribution of Sex Hormone Receptors in Premenopausal Women Are Associated with Varicose Vein Remodelling. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 3974026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Taylor, J.; Hicks, C.W.; Heller, J.A. The hemodynamic effects of pregnancy on the lower extremity venous system. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2018, 6, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Matić, M.; Matić, A.; Gajinov, Z.; Golušin, Z.; Prćić, S.; Jeremić, B. Major risk factors for chronic venous disease development in women: Is childbirth among them? Women Health 2019, 59, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodríguez-Nora, B.; Álvarez-Silvares, E. Actualización del tratamiento de la insuficiencia venosa en la gestación [An update on the treatment of venous insufficiency in pregnancy]. Semergen 2018, 44, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Stone, J.; Hangge, P.; Albadawi, H.; Wallace, A.; Shamoun, F.; Knuttien, M.G.; Naidu, S.; Oklu, R. Deep vein thrombosis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical management. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2017, 7, S276–S284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Malkani, R.; Karia, R.; Thadani, S. A study of risk factors of chronic venous insufficiency and its association with features suggestive of preceding or present deep venous thrombosis. Indian J. Dermatol. 2019, 64, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Waheed, S.M.; Kudaravalli, P.; Hotwagner, D.T. Deep Vein Thrombosis; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  94. Meissner, M.H.; Eklof, B.; Smith, P.C.; Dalsing, M.C.; DePalma, R.G.; Gloviczki, P.; Moneta, G.; Neglén, P.; O’Donnell, T.; Partsch, H.; et al. Secondary chronic venous disorders. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Labropoulos, N.; Gasparis, A.P.; Pefanis, D.; Leon, L.R.; Tassiopoulos, A.K. Secondary chronic venous disease progresses faster than primary. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 49, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kahn, S.R.; M’Lan, C.E.; Lamping, D.L.; Kurz, X.; Bérard, A.; Abenhaim, L. The influence of venous thromboembolism on quality of life and severity of chronic venous disease. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2004, 2, 2146–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kahn, S.R. The post-thrombotic syndrome. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2016, 2016, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huber, G.H.; Manna, B. Vascular Extremity Trauma; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  99. Feliciano, D.V.; Moore, F.A.; Moore, E.E.; West, M.A.; Davis, J.W.; Cocanour, C.S.; Kozar, R.A.; McIntyre, R.C., Jr. Evaluation and management of peripheral vascular injury. Part 1. Western Trauma Association/critical decisions in trauma. J. Trauma 2011, 70, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meissner, M.H.; Wakefield, T.W.; Ascher, E.; Caprini, J.A.; Comerota, A.J.; Eklof, B.; Gillespie, D.L.; Greenfield, L.J.; He, A.R.; Henke, P.K.; et al. Acute venous disease: Venous thrombosis and venous trauma. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 46, 25S–53S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bermudez, K.M.; Knudson, M.M.; Nelken, N.A.; Shackleford, S.; Dean, C.L. Long-term results of lower-extremity venous injuries. Arch. Surg. 1997, 132, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bhatti, A.M.; Siddique, K.; Bashir, R.A.; Sajid, M.T.; Mustafa, Q.A.; Hussain, S.M.; Shukr, I.; Ahmed, M. Unusual causes of secondary varicose veins. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad 2013, 25, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ruskin, K.J. Deep vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism in trauma. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2018, 31, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Boisseau, M.-R. Chronic venous disease and the genetic influence—Servier—PhlebolymphologyServier—Phlebolymphology. Phlebolymphology 2013, 21, 100. [Google Scholar]
  105. Pistorius, M.A. Chronic venous insufficiency: The genetic influence. Angiology 2003, 54, S5–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Vahidnezhad, H.; Youssefian, L.; Uitto, J. Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome belongs to the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Happle, R.; Aelvoet, G.E.; Jorens, P.G.; Roelen, L.M. Klippel-Trenauna syndrome: Is it a paradominant trait? Br. J. Dermatol. 1993, 128, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ceballos-Quintal, J.M.; Pinto-Escalante, D.; Castillo-Zapata, I. A new case of Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber (KTW) syndrome: Evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1996, 63, 426–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, Q.; Timur, A.A.; Szafranski, P.; Sadgephour, A.; Jurecic, V.; Cowell, J.; Baldini, A.; Driscoll, D.J. Identification and molecular characterization of de novo translocation t(8;14)(q22.3;q13) associated with a vascular and tissue overgrowth syndrome. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2002, 95, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Whelan, A.J.; Watson, M.S.; Porter, F.D.; Steiner, R.D. Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome associated with a 5:11 balanced translocation. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1995, 59, 492–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. John, P.R. Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2019, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Asghar, F.; Aqeel, R.; Farooque, U.; Haq, A.; Taimur, M. Presentation and Management of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome: A Review of Available Data. Cureus 2020, 12, e8023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Delis, K.T.; Gloviczki, P.; Wennberg, P.W.; Rooke, T.W.; Driscoll, D.J. Hemodynamic impairment, venous segmental disease, and clinical severity scoring in limbs with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 45, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chagas, C.A.A.; Pires, L.A.S.; Babinski, M.A.; de Oliveira Leite, T.F. Klippel-Trenaunay and Parkes-Weber syndromes: Two case reports. J. Vasc. Bras. 2017, 16, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bayrak-Toydemir, P.; Stevenson, D. Capillary Malformation-Arteriovenous Malformation Syndrome—GeneReviews®—NCBI Bookshelf; University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  116. Bojakowski, K.; Janusz, G.; Grabowska, I.; Zegrocka-Stendel, O.; Surowiecka-Pastewka, A.; Kowalewska, M.; Maciejko, D.; Koziak, K. Rat model of parkes weber syndrome. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Banzic, I.; Brankovic, M.; Maksimović, Ž.; Davidović, L.; Marković, M.; Rančić, Z. Parkes Weber syndrome—Diagnostic and management paradigms: A systematic review. Phlebology 2017, 32, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Anwar, M.A.; Georgiadis, K.A.; Shalhoub, J.; Lim, C.S.; Gohel, M.S.; Davies, A.H. A review of familial, genetic, and congenital aspects of primary varicose vein disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2012, 5, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Labropoulos, N. How Does Chronic Venous Disease Progress from the First Symptoms to the Advanced Stages? A Review. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Raffetto, J.D. Pathophysiology of Chronic Venous Disease and Venous Ulcers. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 98, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Raffetto, J.D.; Mannello, F. Pathophysiology of chronic venous disease. Int. Angiol. 2014, 33, 212–221. [Google Scholar]
  122. Ortega, M.A.; Romero, B.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Sola, M.; Álavrez-Rocha, M.J.; Sainz, F.; Álavrez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Patients with incompetent valves in chronic venous insufficiency show increased systematic lipid peroxidation and cellular oxidative stress markers. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 5164576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Meissner, M.H.; Moneta, G.; Burnand, K.; Gloviczki, P.; Lohr, J.M.; Lurie, F.; Mattos, M.A.; McLafferty, R.B.; Mozes, G.; Rutherford, R.B.; et al. The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 46, S4–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Raju, S.; Knepper, J.; May, C.; Knight, A.; Pace, N.; Jayaraj, A. Ambulatory venous pressure, air plethysmography, and the role of calf venous pump in chronic venous disease. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2019, 7, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Baeyens, N.; Bandyopadhyay, C.; Coon, B.G.; Yun, S.; Schwartz, M.A. Endothelial fluid shear stress sensing in vascular health and disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Recek, C. Venous pressure gradients in the lower extremity and the hemodynamic consequences. Vasa J. Vasc. Dis. 2010, 39, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Raju, S.; Knight, A.; Lamanilao, L.; Pace, N.; Jones, T. Peripheral venous hypertension in chronic venous disease. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2019, 7, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Recek, C.; Pojer, H. Ambulatory pressure gradient in the veins of the lower extremity. Vasa J. Vasc. Dis. 2000, 29, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Senra Barros, B.; Kakkos, S.K.; De Maeseneer, M.; Nicolaides, A.N. Chronic venous disease: From symptoms to microcirculation. Int. Angiol. 2019, 38, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Raffetto, J.D. Pathophysiology of wound healing and alterations in venous leg ulcers—Review. Phlebology 2016, 31, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sapelkin, S.V.; Timina, I.E.; Dudareva, A.S. Chronic venous diseases: Valvular function and leukocyte-endothelial interaction, possibilities of pharmacotherapy. Angiol. Sosud. Khir. 2017, 23, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Nicolaides, A.; Clark, H.; Labropoulos, N.; Geroulakos, G.; Lugli, M.; Maleti, O. Quantitation of reflux and outflow obstruction in patients with CVD and correlation with clinical severity. Int. Angiol. J. Int. Union Angiol. 2014, 33, 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  133. Simka, M. Calf muscle pump dysfunction in the patients with severe chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebolymphology 2004, 47, 298–303. [Google Scholar]
  134. Reček, Č. Conception of the venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity. Angiology 2006, 57, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Vekilov, D.P.; Grande-Allen, K.J. Mechanical Properties of Diseased Veins. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2018, 14, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wali, M.A.; Eid, R.A. Changes of elastic and collagen fibers in varicose veins. Int. Angiol. J. Int. Union Angiol. 2002, 21, 337–343. [Google Scholar]
  137. Wali, M.A.; Dewan, M.; Eid, R.A. Histopathological changes in the wall of varicose veins. Int. Angiol. J. Int. Union Angiol. 2003, 22, 188–193. [Google Scholar]
  138. Coleridge Smith, P.D. Update on chronic-venous-insufficiency-induced inflammatory processes. Angiology 2001, 52, S35–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Danziger, N. Pathophysiology of pain in venous disease. J. Mal. Vasc. 2007, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Sprague, A.H.; Khalil, R.A. Inflammatory cytokines in vascular dysfunction and vascular disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 78, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Zamboni, P.; Lanzara, S.; Mascoli, F.; Caggiati, A.; Liboni, A. Inflammation in venous disease. Int. Angiol. 2008, 27, 361–369. [Google Scholar]
  142. Davies, P.F. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2009, 6, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tisato, V.; Zauli, G.; Voltan, R.; Gianesini, S.; Iasio, M.G.; Volpi, I.; Fiorentini, G.; Zamboni, P.; Secchiero, P. Endothelial cells obtained from patients affected by chronic venous disease exhibit a pro-inflammatory phenotype. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Tarbell, J.M.; Cancel, L.M. The glycocalyx and its significance in human medicine. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 280, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Komarów, W.; Hawro, P.; Lekston, A.; Urbanek, T.; Zagrodzki, P. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic venous disease: An evaluation based on the flow-mediated dilatation test. Int. Angiol. 2015, 34, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  146. Carrasco, O.F.; Ranero, A.; Hong, E.; Vidrio, H. Endothelial function impairment in chronic venous insufficiency: Effect of some cardiovascular protectant agents. Angiology 2009, 60, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mosmiller, L.T.; Steele, K.N.; Shrader, C.D.; Petrone, A.B. Evaluation of inflammatory cell biomarkers in chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2017, 32, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ojdana, D.; Safiejko, K.; Lipska, A.; Sacha, P.; Wieczorek, P.; Radziwon, P.; Dadan, J.; Tryniszewska, E. The inflammatory reaction during chronic venous disease of lower limbs. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2009, 47, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ono, T.; Bergan, J.J.; Schmid-Schonbein, G.W.; Takase, S. Monocyte infiltration into venous valves. J. Vasc. Surg. 1998, 27, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Powell, C.C.; Rohrer, M.J.; Barnard, M.R.; Peyton, B.D.; Furman, M.I.; Michelson, A.D. Chronic venous insufficiency is associated with increased platelet and monocyte activation and aggregation. J. Vasc. Surg. 1999, 30, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ferris, A.E.; Harding, K.G. An overview of the relationship between anaemia, iron, and venous leg ulcers. Int. Wound J. 2019, 16, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zamboni, P. The Big Idea: Iron-dependent inflammation in venous disease and proposed parallels in multiple sclerosis. J. R. Soc. Med. 2006, 99, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ferris, A.E.; Harding, K.G. Does localized iron loss in venous disease lead to systemic iron deficiency? A descriptive pilot study. Wound Repair Regen. 2020, 28, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Caggiati, A.; Rosi, C.; Casini, A.; Cirenza, M.; Petrozza, V.; Acconcia, M.C.; Zamboni, P. Skin iron deposition characterises lipodermatosclerosis and leg ulcer. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2010, 40, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sindrilaru, A.; Peters, T.; Wieschalka, S.; Baican, C.; Baican, A.; Peter, H.; Hainzl, A.; Schatz, S.; Qi, Y.; Schlecht, A.; et al. An unrestrained proinflammatory M1 macrophage population induced by iron impairs wound healing in humans and mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Nicolaides, A.N. Chronic venous disease and the leukocyte-endothelium interaction: From symptoms to ulceration. Proc. Angiol. 2005, 56, S11–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Stvrtinova, V.; Jahnova, E.; Weissova, S.; Ferencik, H.M. Inflammatory mechanisms involving neutrophils in chronic venous insufficiency of lower limbs. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2001, 102, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  158. Bogachev, V.I.; Golovanova, O.V.; Sergeeva, N.A.; Kuznetsov, A.N. Participation of leucocytes in pathogenesis of primary forms of lower limb chronic venous disease. Angiol. Sosud. Khir. 2011, 17, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  159. Whiston, R.J.; Hallett, M.B.; Davies, E.V.; Harding, K.G.; Lane, I.F. Inappropriate neutrophil activation in venous disease. Br. J. Surg. 1994, 81, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Takase, S.; Schmid-Schonbein, G.; Bergan, J.J. Leukocyte activation in patients with venous insufficiency. J. Vasc. Surg. 1999, 30, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Grudzińska, E.; Czuba, Z.P. Immunological aspects of chronic venous disease pathogenesis. Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 39, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Engin, M.; Goncu, M.T. The role of plateletcrit and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in showing the clinical severity of the disease in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Ann. Med. Res. 2020, 27, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sayer, G.L.; Smith, P.D.C. Immunocytochemical characterisation of the inflammatory cell infiltrate of varicose veins. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2004, 28, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Haviarová, Z.; Weismann, P.; Pavlíková, D.; Durdík, Š.; Kovác, P.; Štvrtinová, V.; Mráz, P. Mast cell infiltration in the wall of varicose veins. Acta Histochem. 2002, 104, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kakkos, S.; Zolota, V.; Peristeropoulou, P.; Apostolopoulou, A.; Geroukalos, G.; Tsolakis, I. Increased mast cell infiltration in familial varicose veins: Pathogenetic implications? Int. Angiol. 2003, 22, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  166. Chu, H.B.; Yan, F.; Zhao, J.H.; Xu, Y.B.; Wang, T.; Guo, W.J. Assessment of the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the walls of thrombotic varicose veins. Angiology 2013, 64, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Boisseau, M. Leukocyte involvement in the signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease. Perspectives for therapy. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2007, 37, 277–290. [Google Scholar]
  168. Lintermans, L.L.; Stegeman, C.A.; Heeringa, P.; Abdulahad, W.H. T cells in vascular inflammatory diseases. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Gagliani, N.; Huber, S. Basic aspects of T helper cell differentiation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1514, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Kumar, B.V.; Connors, T.J.; Farber, D.L. Human T Cell Development, Localization, and Function throughout Life. Immunity 2018, 48, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Saigusa, R.; Winkels, H.; Ley, K. T cell subsets and functions in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ojdana, D.; Safiejko, K.; Milewski, R.; Sacha, P.; Wieczorek, P.; Lipska, A.; Radziwon, P.; Dadan, J.; Tryniszewska, E. Evaluation of the memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells homeostasis during chronic venous disease of lower limbs. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2009, 47, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Buján, J.; Pascual, G.; Bellón, J. Interaction between ageing, inflammation process, and the occurence of varicose veins. Phlebolymphology 2008, 15, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  174. Grudzinska, E.; Lekstan, A.; Szliszka, E.; Czuba, Z.P. Cytokines produced by lymphocytes in the incompetent great saphenous vein. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 7161346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lattimer, C.R.; Kalodiki, E.; Geroulakos, G.; Hoppensteadt, D.; Fareed, J. Are Inflammatory Biomarkers Increased in Varicose Vein Blood? Clin. Appl. Thromb. 2016, 22, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Guss, L.G.; Javvaji, S.; Case, J.; Barrick, B.; Schaefer, K.N. Differences in Inflammatory Cytokine Levels between Patients with Varying Severity of Chronic Venous Insufficiency. J. Vasc. Med. Surg. 2018, 6, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Howlader, M.H.; Coleridge Smith, P.D. Symptoms of chronic venous disease and association with systemic inflammatory markers. J. Vasc. Surg. 2003, 38, 950–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Serralheiro, P.; Soares, A.; Costa Almeida, C.M.; Verde, I. TGF-β1 in Vascular Wall Pathology: Unraveling Chronic Venous Insufficiency Pathophysiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Serralheiro, P.; Novais, A.; Cairrão, E.; Maia, C.; Costa Almeida, C.M.; Verde, I. Variability of MMP/TIMP and TGF-β1 Receptors throughout the Clinical Progression of Chronic Venous Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Pastar, I.; Stojadinovic, O.; Krzyzanowska, A.; Barrientos, S.; Stuelten, C.; Zimmerman, K.; Blumenberg, M.; Brem, H.; Tomic-Canic, M. Attenuation of the transforming growth factor beta-signaling pathway in chronic venous ulcers. Mol. Med. 2010, 16, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Kowalewski, R.; Malkowski, A.; Sobolewski, K.; Gacko, M. Evaluation of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway in the wall of normal and varicose veins. Pathobiology 2010, 77, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Lim, C.S.; Kiriakidis, S.; Sandison, A.; Paleolog, E.M.; Davies, A.H. Hypoxia-inducible factor pathway and diseases of the vascular wall. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 58, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kachlík, D.; Lametschwandtner, A.; Rejmontová, J.; Stingl, J.; Vaněk, I. Vasa vasorum of the human great saphenous vein. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2002, 24, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lim, C.S.; Gohel, M.S.; Shepherd, A.C.; Paleolog, E.; Davies, A.H. Venous hypoxia: A poorly studied etiological factor of varicose veins. J. Vasc. Res. 2011, 48, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lim, C.S.; Kiriakidis, S.; Paleolog, E.M.; Davies, A.H. Increased activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway in varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. 2012, 55, 1427–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Michiels, C.; Arnould, T.; Remacle, J. Endothelial cell responses to hypoxia: Initiation of a cascade of cellular interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2000, 1497, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kachlík, D.; Stingl, J.; Sosna, B.; Straka, Z.; Lametschwandtner, A.; Minnich, B.; Fára, P. Morphological features of vasa vasorum in pathologically changed human great saphenous vein and its tributaries. Vasa J. Vasc. Dis. 2008, 37, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Xu, Y.; Bei, Y.; Li, Y.; Chu, H. Phenotypic and functional transformation in smooth muscle cells derived from varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2017, 5, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Wali, M.A.; Eid, R.A. Smooth muscle changes in varicose veins: An ultrastructural study. J. Smooth Muscle Res. 2001, 37, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Somers, P.; Knaapen, M. The histopathology of varicose vein disease. Angiology 2006, 57, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Xiao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Yin, H.; Lin, Y.; Wang, S. In vitro differences between smooth muscle cells derived from varicose veins and normal veins. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 50, 1149–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Ortega, M.A.; Romero, B.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Sainz, F.; Martinez-Vivero, C.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; Garc-a-Honduvilla, N. Behavior of smooth muscle cells under hypoxic conditions: Possible implications on the varicose vein endothelium. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7156150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Bujan, J.; Jimenez-Cossio, J.A.; Jurado, F.; Gimeno, M.J.; Pascual, G.; Garcia-Honduvilla, N.; Dominguez, B.; Bellon, J.M. Evaluation of the smooth muscle cell component and apoptosis in the varicose vein wall. Histol. Histopathol. 2000, 15, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Lim, C.S.; Davies, A.H. Pathogenesis of primary varicose veins. Br. J. Surg. 2009, 96, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Atta, H.M. Varicose veins: Role of mechanotransduction of venous hypertension. Int. J. Vasc. Med. 2012, 2012, 538627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Bergan, J. Molecular Mechanisms in Chronic Venous Insufficiency. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 21, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Saberianpour, S.; modaghegh, M.H.S.; Rahimi, H.; Kamyar, M.M. Role of mechanosignaling on pathology of varicose vein. Biophys. Rev. 2021, 13, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Bruczko-Goralewska, M.; Romanowicz, L.; Baczyk, J.; Wolańska, M.; Sobolewski, K.; Kowalewski, R. Peptide growth factors and their receptors in the vein wall. J. Investig. Med. 2019, 67, 1149–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Ortega, M.A.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Martínez-Vivero, C.; Pekarek, L.; Coca, S.; Guijarro, L.G.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N.; et al. Chronic Venous Disease Patients Showed Altered Expression of IGF-1/PAPP-A/STC-2 Axis in the Vein Wall. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 6782659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Pascual, G.; Mendieta, C.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Corrales, C.; Bellón, J.M.; Buján, J. TGF-β1 upregulation in the aging varicose vein. J. Vasc. Res. 2007, 44, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Kim, B.C.; Kim, H.T.; Park, S.H.; Cha, J.S.; Yufit, T.; Kim, S.J.; Falanga, V. Fibroblasts from chronic wounds show altered TGF-beta-signaling and decreased TGF-beta Type II receptor expression. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 195, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ortega, M.A.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Coca, S. Signal Transduction Pathways in Breast Cancer: The Important Role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR. J. Oncol. 2020, 2020, 9258396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Ortega, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Leal, J.; Romero, B.; Alvarez-Rocha, M.J.; Sainz, F.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Implication of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in the process of incompetent valves in patients with chronic venous insufficiency and the relationship with aging. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 1495170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Ortega, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Romero, B.; Álvarez-Rocha, M.J.; Sainz, F.; Leal, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Unravelling the role of mapks (erk1/2) in venous reflux in patients with chronic venous disorder. Cells Tissues Organs 2019, 206, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Ortega, M.A.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Pekarek, L.; Alvarez-Mon, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Sanchez-Trujillo, L.; Coca, S.; Buján, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; García-Honduvilla, N.; et al. Defective expression of the peroxisome regulators PPARα receptors and lysogenesis with increased cellular senescence in the venous wall of chronic venous disorder. Histol. Histopathol. 2021, 18322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Ortega, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Pekarek, L.; Alvarez-Mon, M.A.; Delforge, A.; Sáez, M.A.; Coca, S.; Sainz, F.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; et al. Histopathological study of JNK in venous wall of patients with chronic venous insufficiency related to osteogenesis process. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1921–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Schuller-Petrovic, S.; Stessel, H.; Brunner, F. Ca2+ mobilization in saphenous vein smooth muscle cells derived from patients with primary varicosity. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 32, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Cario-Toumaniantz, C.; Evellin, S.; Maury, S.; Baron, O.; Pacaud, P.; Loirand, G. Role of Rho kinase signalling in healthy and varicose human saphenous veins. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 137, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Charpentier, M.S.; Christine, K.S.; Amin, N.M.; Dorr, K.M.; Kushner, E.J.; Bautch, V.L.; Taylor, J.M.; Conlon, F.L. CASZ1 Promotes Vascular Assembly and Morphogenesis through the Direct Regulation of an EGFL7/RhoA-Mediated Pathway. Dev. Cell 2013, 25, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Oh-hora, M.; Rao, A. The calcium/NFAT pathway: Role in development and function of regulatory T cells. Microbes Infect. 2009, 11, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Graef, I.A.; Chen, F.; Chen, L.; Kuo, A.; Crabtree, G.R. Signals transduced by Ca2+/calcineurin and NFATc3/c4 pattern the developing vasculature. Cell 2001, 105, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Gonzalez Bosc, L.V.; Wilkerson, M.K.; Bradley, K.N.; Eckman, D.M.; Hill-Eubanks, D.C.; Nelson, M.T. Intraluminal pressure is a stimulus for NFATc3 nuclear accumulation: Role of calcium, endothelium-derived nitric oxide, and cGMP-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 10702–10709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Feldo, M.; Woźniak, M.; Wójciak-Kosior, M.; Sowa, I.; Kot-Waśik, A.; Aszyk, J.; Bogucki, J.; Zubilewicz, T.; Bogucka-Kocka, A. Influence of Diosmin Treatment on the Level of Oxidative Stress Markers in Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 2561705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Cario-Toumaniantz, C.; Boularan, C.; Schurgers, L.J.; Heymann, M.F.; Le Cunff, M.; Léger, J.; Loirand, G.; Pacaud, P. Identification of differentially expressed genes in human varicose veins: Involvement of matrix Gla protein in extracellular matrix remodeling. J. Vasc. Res. 2007, 44, 444–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Jaminon, A.M.G.; Dai, L.; Qureshi, A.R.; Evenepoel, P.; Ripsweden, J.; Söderberg, M.; Witasp, A.; Olauson, H.; Schurgers, L.J.; Stenvinkel, P. Matrix Gla protein is an independent predictor of both intimal and medial vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Bjørklund, G.; Svanberg, E.; Dadar, M.; Card, D.J.; Chirumbolo, S.; Harrington, D.J.; Aaseth, J. The Role of Matrix Gla Protein (MGP) in Vascular Calcification. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 1647–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Boström, K.; Zebbondj, A.F.; Yao, Y.; Lin, T.S.; Torres, A. Matrix GLA protein stimulates VEGF expression through increased transforming growth factor-β1 activity in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 52904–52913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Harraz, O.F.; Jensen, L.J. Aging, calcium channel signaling and vascular tone. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2020, 191, 111336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Horecka, A.; Hordyjewska, A.; Biernacka, J.; Dąbrowski, W.; Zubilewicz, T.; Malec, A.; Musik, I.; Kurzepa, J. Intense remodeling of extracellular matrix within the varicose vein: The role of gelatinases and vascular endothelial growth factor. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 190, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Chen, Y.; Peng, W.; Raffetto, J.D.; Khalil, R.A. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Remodeling of Lower Extremity Veins and Chronic Venous Disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 147, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. MacColl, E.; Khalil, R.A. Matrix metalloproteinases as regulators of vein structure and function: Implications in chronic venous disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015, 355, 410–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Raffetto, J.D.; Ross, R.L.; Khalil, R.A. Matrix metalloproteinase 2-induced venous dilation via hyperpolarization and activation of K+ channels: Relevance to varicose vein formation. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 45, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Dorland, Y.L.; Huveneers, S. Cell–cell junctional mechanotransduction in endothelial remodeling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 74, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Faringthon, R.; Sosa, V. Chronic venous insufficiency and structural changes in the walls of the veins. Rev. Méd. Sinerg. 2019, 4, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  225. Boisseau, M.R. Recent findings in the pathogenesis of venous wall degradation. Phlebolymphology 2007, 14, 59–73. [Google Scholar]
  226. Sansilvestri-Morel, P.; Rupin, A.; Badier-Commander, C.; Fabiani, J.N.; Verbeuren, T.J. Chronic venous insufficiency: Dysregulation of collagen synthesis. Angiology 2003, 54, S13–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Antonicelli, F.; Bellon, G.; Debelle, L.; Hornebeck, W. Elastin-Elastases and Inflamm-Aging. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2007, 79, 99–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Kanta, J.; Zavadakova, A. Role of fibronectin in chronic venous diseases: A review. Vasc. Med. 2020, 25, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; Oklu, R.; Lynch, M.; Fava, M.; Baig, F.; Yin, X.; Barwari, T.; Potier, D.N.; Albadawi, H.; Jahangiri, M.; et al. Extracellular matrix remodelling in response to venous hypertension: Proteomics of human varicose veins. Cardiovasc. Res. 2016, 110, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Okamoto, O.; Fujiwara, S. Dermatopontin, a novel player in the biology of the extracellular matrix. Connect. Tissue Res. 2006, 47, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Shibuya, H.; Okamoto, O.; Fujiwara, S. The bioactivity of transforming growth factor-β1 can be regulated via binding to dermal collagens in mink lung epithelial cells. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2006, 41, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Imanaka-Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, T.; Miyagawa-Tomita, S. Tenascin-C in development and disease of blood vessels. Anat. Rec. 2014, 297, 1747–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Huveneers, S.; Oldenburg, J.; Spanjaard, E.; van der Krogt, G.; Grigoriev, I.; Akhmanova, A.; Rehmann, H.; de Rooij, J. Vinculin associates with endothelial VE-cadherin junctions to control force-dependent remodeling. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196, 641–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Reily, C.; Stewart, T.J.; Renfrow, M.B.; Novak, J. Glycosylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 346–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; Baig, F.; Fava, M.; Yin, X.; Mayr, M. Glycoproteomics of the extracellular matrix: A method for intact glycopeptide analysis using mass spectrometry. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 2017, 55674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Ellinghaus, E.; Ellinghaus, D.; Krusche, P.; Greiner, A.; Schreiber, C.; Nikolaus, S.; Gieger, C.; Strauch, K.; Lieb, W.; Rosenstiel, P.; et al. Genome-wide association analysis for chronic venous disease identifies EFEMP1 and KCNH8 as susceptibility loci. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Serra, R.; Ssempijja, L.; Provenzano, M.; Andreucci, M. Genetic biomarkers in chronic venous disease. Biomark. Med. 2020, 14, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Xu, H.M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.M.; Zhu, T.; Fu, W.G. Polymorphisms in MMP-9 and TIMP-2 in Chinese patients with varicose veins. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 168, e143–e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Shadrina, A.S.; Sharapov, S.Z.; Shashkova, T.I.; Tsepilov, Y.A. Varicose veins of lower extremities: Insights from the first large-scale genetic study. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Jones, G.T.; Marsman, J.; Pardo, L.M.; Nijsten, T.; De Maeseneer, M.; Phillips, V.; Lynch-Sutherland, C.; Horsfield, J.; Krysa, J.; van Rij, A.M. A variant of the castor zinc finger 1 (CASZ1) gene is differentially associated with the clinical classification of chronic venous disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Douguet, D.; Patel, A.; Xu, A.; Vanhoutte, P.M.; Honoré, E. Piezo Ion Channels in Cardiovascular Mechanobiology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 40, 956–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Nonomura, K.; Lukacs, V.; Sweet, D.T.; Goddard, L.M.; Kanie, A.; Whitwam, T.; Ranade, S.S.; Fujimori, T.; Kahn, M.L.; Patapoutian, A. Mechanically activated ion channel PIEZO1 is required for lymphatic valve formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 12817–12822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Li, J.; Hou, B.; Tumova, S.; Muraki, K.; Bruns, A.; Ludlow, M.J.; Sedo, A.; Hyman, A.J.; McKeown, L.; Young, R.S.; et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature 2014, 515, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Alper, S.L. Genetic Diseases of PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 Dysfunction. Curr. Top. Membr. 2017, 79, 97–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Vilagos, B.; Hoffmann, M.; Souabni, A.; Sun, Q.; Werner, B.; Medvedovic, J.; Bilic, I.; Minnich, M.; Axelsson, E.; Jaritz, M.; et al. Essential role of EBF1 in the generation and function of distinct mature B cell types. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 775–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Ahmed, W.-U.-R.; Wiberg MRCS, A.; Ng, M.; Wang, W.; Auton, A. Genome-wide association analysis and replication in 810,625 individuals identifies novel therapeutic targets for varicose veins. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Kazenwadel, J.; Betterman, K.L.; Chong, C.E.; Stokes, P.H.; Lee, Y.K.; Secker, G.A.; Agalarov, Y.; Demir, C.S.; Lawrence, D.M.; Sutton, D.L.; et al. GATA2 is required for lymphatic vessel valve development and maintenance. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 2879–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Smetanina, M.A.; Shevela, A.I.; Gavrilov, K.A.; Filipenko, M.L. The genetic constituent of varicose vein pathogenesis as a key for future treatment option development. Vessel Plus 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Lyons, O.; Saha, P.; Seet, C.; Kuchta, A.; Arnold, A.; Grover, S.; Rashbrook, V.; Sabine, A.; Vizcay-Barrena, G.; Patel, A.; et al. Human venous valve disease caused by mutations in FOXC2 and GJC2. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 2437–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Sabine, A.; Bovay, E.; Demir, C.S.; Kimura, W.; Jaquet, M.; Agalarov, Y.; Zangger, N.; Scallan, J.P.; Graber, W.; Gulpinar, E.; et al. FOXC2 and fluid shear stress stabilize postnatal lymphatic vasculature. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 3861–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Berna-Erro, A.; Jardin, I.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Role of STIM2 in cell function and physiopathology. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 3111–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Barton, J.C.; Edwards, C.Q.; Acton, R.T. HFE gene: Structure, function, mutations, and associated iron abnormalities. Gene 2015, 574, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Gaenzer, H.; Marschang, P.; Sturm, W.; Neumayr, G.; Vogel, W.; Patsch, J.; Weiss, G. Association between increased iron stores and impaired endothelial function in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 2189–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Zamboni, P.; Izzo, M.; Tognazzo, S.; Carandina, S.; De Palma, M.; Catozzi, L.; Caggiati, A.; Scapoli, G.; Gemmati, D. The overlapping of local iron overload and HFE mutation in venous leg ulcer pathogenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 1869–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Augstein, A.; Mierke, J.; Poitz, D.M.; Strasser, R.H. Sox9 is increased in arterial plaque and stenosis, associated with synthetic phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells and causes alterations in extracellular matrix and calcification. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 2526–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Hanley, K.P.; Oakley, F.; Sugden, S.; Wilson, D.I.; Mann, D.A.; Hanley, N.A. Ectopic SOX9 mediates extracellular matrix deposition characteristic of organ fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 14063–14071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Jin, Y.; Xu, G.; Huang, J.; Zhou, D.; Huang, X.; Shen, L. Analysis of the association between an insertion/deletion polymorphism within the 3′ untranslated region of COL1A2 and chronic venous insufficiency. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 27, 959–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Zöller, B.; Ji, J.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K. Venous thromboembolism and varicose veins share familial susceptibility: A nationwide family study in Sweden. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e000850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Poredos, P.; Spirkoska, A.; Rucigaj, T.; Fareed, J.; Jezovnik, M.K. Do blood constituents in varicose veins differ from the systemic blood constituents? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015, 50, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Dupont, C.; Armant, D.R.; Brenner, C.A. Epigenetics: Definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Moosavi, A.; Ardekani, A.M. Role of epigenetics in biology and human diseases. Iran. Biomed. J. 2016, 20, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Al Aboud, N.M.; Jialal, I. Genetics, Epigenetic Mechanism; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  263. Alegría-Torres, J.A.; Baccarelli, A.; Bollati, V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics 2011, 3, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Pal, S.; Tyler, J.K. Epigenetics and aging. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Sahar, S.; Sassone-Corsi, P. The epigenetic language of circadian clocks. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2013, 217, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Ordovás, J.M.; Smith, C.E. Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2010, 7, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Ku, K.H.; Subramaniam, N.; Marsden, P.A. Epigenetic determinants of flow-mediated vascular endothelial gene expression. Hypertension 2019, 74, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Dunn, J.; Simmons, R.; Thabet, S.; Jo, H. The role of epigenetics in the endothelial cell shear stress response and atherosclerosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 67, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Shanmugam, M.K.; Sethi, G. Role of epigenetics in in flammation-associated diseases. Subcell. Biochem. 2013, 61, 627–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Nakamura, N.; Shi, X.; Darabi, R.; Li, Y. Hypoxia in Cell Reprogramming and the Epigenetic Regulations. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 609984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Edwards, J.R.; Yarychkivska, O.; Boulard, M.; Bestor, T.H. DNA methylation and DNA methyltransferases. Epigenet. Chromatin 2017, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Sallustio, F.; Gesualdo, L.; Gallone, A. New findings showing how DNA methylation influences diseases. World J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Smyth, L.J.; McKay, G.J.; Maxwell, A.P.; McKnight, A.J. DNA hypermethylation and DNA hypomethylation is present at different loci in chronic kidney disease. Epigenetics 2013, 9, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Derecka, M.; Herman, J.S.; Cauchy, P.; Ramamoorthy, S.; Lupar, E.; Grün, D.; Grosschedl, R. EBF1-deficient bone marrow stroma elicits persistent changes in HSC potential. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Wilmanns, C.; Cooper, A.; Wockner, L.; Katsandris, S.; Glaser, N.; Meyer, A.; Bartsch, O.; Binder, H.; Walter, P.K.; Zechner, U. Morphology and Progression in Primary Varicose Vein Disorder Due to 677C>T and 1298A>C Variants of MTHFR. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Xu, J.; Li, K.; Zhou, W. Relationship between genetic polymorphism of MTHFR C677T and lower extremities deep venous thrombosis. Hematology 2019, 24, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Smetanina, M.A.; Kel, A.E.; Sevost’ianova, K.S.; Maiborodin, I.V.; Shevela, A.I.; Zolotukhin, I.A.; Stegmaier, P.; Filipenko, M.L. DNA methylation and gene expression profiling reveal MFAP5 as a regulatory driver of extracellular matrix remodeling in varicose vein disease. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 1103–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Jiang, H.; Lun, Y.; Wu, X.; Xia, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xin, S.; Zhang, J. Association between the hypomethylation of osteopontin and integrin β3 promoters and vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype switching in great saphenous varicose veins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 18747–18761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Beermann, J.; Piccoli, M.T.; Viereck, J.; Thum, T. Non-coding rnas in development and disease: Background, mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1297–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Jiang, M.; Cui, C.; Liu, G.; Huang, Y.; Lu, X.; Lu, M.; Huang, X.; Li, W. MicroRNA Profiling in GSV Tissues of Patients with CVI MicroRNA Profiling in Great Saphenous Vein Tissues of Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2012, 228, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Barwari, T.; Joshi, A.; Mayr, M. MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 2577–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Condrat, C.E.; Thompson, D.C.; Barbu, M.G.; Bugnar, O.L.; Boboc, A.; Cretoiu, D.; Suciu, N.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Voinea, S.C. miRNAs as Biomarkers in Disease: Latest Findings Regarding Their Role in Diagnosis and Prognosis. Cells 2020, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Anwar, M.A.; Adesina-Georgiadis, K.N.; Spagou, K.; Vorkas, P.A.; Li, J.V.; Shalhoub, J.; Holmes, E.; Davies, A.H. A comprehensive characterisation of the metabolic profile of varicose veins; implications in elaborating plausible cellular pathways for disease pathogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Zalewski, D.P.; Ruszel, K.P.; Stępniewski, A.; Gałkowski, D.; Bogucki, J.; Komsta, Ł.; Kołodziej, P.; Chmiel, P.; Zubilewicz, T.; Feldo, M.; et al. Dysregulations of MicroRNA and Gene Expression in Chronic Venous Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Schmitz, S.U.; Grote, P.; Herrmann, B.G. Mechanisms of long noncoding RNA function in development and disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 2491–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Li, X.; Jiang, X.Y.; Ge, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, G.J.; Xu, L.; Xie, D.Y.; Yuan, T.Y.; Zhang, D.S.; Zhang, H.; et al. Aberrantly expressed lncRNAs in primary varicose great saphenous veins. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Biranvand, A.S.; Khosravi, M.; Esfandiari, G.; Poursaleh, A.; Hosseini-Fard, S.R.; Amirfarhangi, A.; Najafi, M. Associations between miR-661, miR-1202, lncRNA-HOTAIR, lncRNA-GAS5 and MMP9 in differentiated M2-macrophages of patients with varicose veins. Int. Angiol. 2018, 37, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Smith, R.K.; Golledge, J. A systematic review of circulating markers in primary chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2014, 29, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Gude, N.M.; Roberts, C.T.; Kalionis, B.; King, R.G. Growth and function of the normal human placenta. Thromb. Res. 2004, 114, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Latendresse, G.; Founds, S. The Fascinating and Complex Role of the Placenta in Pregnancy and Fetal Well-being. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2015, 60, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Burton, G.J.; Fowden, A.L.; Thornburg, K.L. Placental origins of chronic disease. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1509–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. García-Honduvilla, N.; Ortega, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Álvarez-Rocha, M.J.; Romero, B.; De León-Luis, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J. Placentas from women with pregnancy-associated venous insufficiency show villi damage with evidence of hypoxic cellular stress. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 77, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Ortega, M.A.; Saez, M.Á.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Romero, B.; Bravo, C.; Coca, S.; Sainz, F.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Upregulation of VEGF and PEDF in Placentas of Women with Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency during Pregnancy and Its Implication in Villous Calcification. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 5320902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Ortega, M.A.; Saez, M.A.; Sainz, F.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; García-Gallego, S.; Pekarek, L.; Bravo, C.; Coca, S.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; et al. Lipidomic profiling of chorionic villi in the placentas of women with chronic venous disease. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 2790–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Ortega, M.A.; Saez, M.A.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Pekarek, L.; Bravo, C.; Coca, S.; Sainz, F.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; et al. Increased angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in the placental villi of women with chronic venous disease during pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Ortega, M.A.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Álvarez-Rocha, M.J.; Romero, B.; De León-Luis, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Remodelling of collagen fibres in the placentas of women with venous insufficiency during pregnancy. Histol. Histopathol. 2018, 33, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Ortega, M.A.; Romero, B.; Asúnsolo, Á.; Martínez-Vivero, C.; Sainz, F.; Bravo, C.; De León-Luis, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; García-Honduvilla, N. Pregnancy-associated venous insufficiency course with placental and systemic oxidative stress. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 4157–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Jena, M.K.; Sharma, N.R.; Petitt, M.; Maulik, D.; Nayak, N.R. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia and therapeutic approaches targeting the placenta. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Urbanek, T.; Juśko, M.; Kuczmik, W.B. Compression therapy for leg oedema in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2020, 7, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Pappas, P.J.; Lakhanpal, S.; Nguyen, K.Q.; Vanjara, R. The Center for Vein Restoration Study on presenting symptoms, treatment modalities, and outcomes in Medicare-eligible patients with chronic venous disorders. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2018, 6, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Dissemond, J.; Storck, M.; Kröger, K.; Stücker, M. Indications and contraindications for modern compression therapy. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2018, 168, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Shingler, S.; Robertson, L.; Boghossian, S.; Stewart, M. Compression stockings for the initial treatment of varicose veins in patients without venous ulceration. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Konschake, W.; Riebe, H.; Pediaditi, P.; Haase, H.; Jünger, M.; Lutze, S. Compression in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency: Efficacy depending on the length of the stocking. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2016, 64, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Omeara, S.; Martyn-St James, M. Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. O’Hare, J.L.; Stephens, J.; Parkin, D.; Earnshaw, J.J. Randomized clinical trial of different bandage regimens after foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Br. J. Surg. 2010, 97, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Huang, T.W.; Chen, S.L.; Bai, C.H.; Wu, C.H.; Tam, K.W. The optimal duration of compression therapy following varicose vein surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2013, 45, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Rabe, E.; Partsch, H.; Morrison, N.; Meissner, M.H.; Mosti, G.; Lattimer, C.R.; Carpentier, P.H.; Gaillard, S.; Jünger, M.; Urbanek, T.; et al. Risks and contraindications of medical compression treatment—A critical reappraisal. An international consensus statement. Phlebology 2020, 35, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Gohel, M.; Davies, A. Pharmacological Agents in the Treatment of Venous Disease: An Update of the Available Evidence. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2009, 7, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Martinez-Zapata, M.J.; Vernooij, R.W.; Uriona Tuma, S.M.; Stein, A.T.; Moreno, R.M.; Vargas, E.; Capellà, D.; Bonfill Cosp, X. Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Andreozzi, G.M. Sulodexide in the treatment of chronic venous disease. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2012, 12, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Bush, R.; Comerota, A.; Meissner, M.; Raffetto, J.D.; Hahn, S.R.; Freeman, K. Recommendations for the medical management of chronic venous disease: The role of Micronized Purified Flavanoid Fraction (MPFF): Recommendations from the Working Group in Chronic Venous Disease (CVD) 2016. Phlebology 2017, 32, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Mansilha, A.; Sousa, J. Pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic venous disease and implications for venoactive drug therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Perrin, M.; Ramelet, A.A. Pharmacological treatment of primary chronic venous disease: Rationale, results and unanswered questions. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011, 41, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Wittens, C.; Davies, A.H.; Bækgaard, N.; Broholm, R.; Cavezzi, A.; Chastanet, S.; De Wolf, M.; Eggen, C.; Giannoukas, A.; Gohel, M.; et al. Editor’s choice—Management of chronic venous disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015, 49, 678–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Coleridge-Smith, P.; Lok, C.; Ramelet, A.A. Venous leg ulcer: A meta-analysis of adjunctive therapy with micronized purified flavonoid fraction. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005, 30, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. De-Abreu, G.C.G.; De Camargo Júnior, O.; De-Abreu, M.F.M.; De-Aquino, J.L.B. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for severe chronic venous insufficiency. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2017, 44, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Rasmussen, L.H.; Lawaetz, M.; Bjoern, L.; Vennits, B.; Blemings, A.; Eklof, B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br. J. Surg. 2011, 98, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Rigby, K.A.; Palfreyman, S.S.; Beverley, C.; Michaels, J.A. Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Kulkarni, S.R.; Slim, F.J.A.; Emerson, L.G.; Davies, C.; Bulbulia, R.A.; Whyman, M.R.; Poskitt, K.R. Effect of foam sclerotherapy on healing and long-term recurrence in chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 2013, 28, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Lin, F.; Zhang, S.; Sun, Y.; Ren, S.; Liu, P. The management of varicose veins. Int. Surg. 2015, 100, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Gujja, K.; Wiley, J.; Krishnan, P. Chronic venous insufficiency. Interv. Cardiol. Clin. 2014, 3, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Brar, R.; Nordon, I.M.; Hinchliffe, R.J.; Loftus, I.M.; Thompson, M.M. Surgical management of varicose veins: Meta-analysis. Vascular 2010, 18, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Puggioni, A.; Kalra, M.; Gloviczki, P. Superficial vein surgery and SEPS for chronic venous insufficiency. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2005, 18, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Van de Bos, R.R.; de Maeseneer, M.M. Endovenous thermal ablation for varicose veins: Strengths and weaknesses. Phlebolymphology 2012, 19, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  325. Attaran, R. Latest Innovations in the Treatment of Venous Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Balint, R.; Farics, A.; Parti, K.; Vizsy, L.; Batorfi, J.; Menyhei, G.; Balint, I.B. Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review. Vascular 2016, 24, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Van den Bos, R.; Arends, L.; Kockaert, M.; Neumann, M.; Nijsten, T. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: A meta-analysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 49, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Lane, R.J.; Cuzzilla, M.L.; Coroneos, J.C. The treatment of varicose veins with external stenting to the saphenofemoral junction. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2002, 36, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Meghdadi, A.; Jones, S.A.; Patel, V.A.; Lewis, A.L.; Millar, T.M.; Carugo, D. Foam-in-vein: A review of rheological properties and characterization methods for optimization of sclerosing foams. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2021, 109, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Fernández-Colino, A.; Jockenhoevel, S. Advances in Engineering Venous Valves: The Pursuit of a Definite Solution for Chronic Venous Disease. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Brandt, A.H. Evaluation of new ultrasound techniques for clinical imaging in selected liver and vascular applications. Dan. Med. J. 2018, 65, B5455. [Google Scholar]
  332. García-Montero, C.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Gómez-Lahoz, A.M.; Pekarek, L.; Castellanos, A.J.; Noguerales-Fraguas, F.; Coca, S.; Guijarro, L.G.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Asúnsolo, A.; et al. Nutritional components in western diet versus mediterranean diet at the gut microbiota-immune system interplay implications for health and disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. McDaniel, J.C.; Kemmner, K.G.; Rusnak, S. Nutritional profile of older adults with chronic venous leg ulcers: A pilot study. Geriatr. Nurs. 2015, 36, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Volpe, E.F.T.; Resqueti, V.R.; Da Silva, A.A.M.; Gualdi, L.P.; Fregonezi, G.A.F. Supervised exercise protocol for lower limbs in subjects with chronic venous disease: An evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Trials 2020, 21, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Orr, L.; Klement, K.A.; McCrossin, L.; Drombolis, D.O.; Houghton, P.E.; Spaulding, S.; Burke, S. A systematic review and meta-Analysis of exercise intervention for the treatment of calf muscle pump impairment in individuals with chronic venous insufficiency. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2017, 63, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Padberg, F.T.; Johnston, M.V.; Sisto, S.A.; Burnand, K.G.; Wakefield, T.W.; Perkowski, P. Structured exercise improves calf muscle pump function in chronic venous insufficiency: A randomized trial. J. Vasc. Surg. 2004, 39, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Mutlak, O.; Slam, M.A.; Dfield, N.S. The influence of exercise on ulcer healing in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Proc. Inter. Angiol. 2018, 37, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Brown, G.C. Living too long. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Bozkurt, A.K.; Balkanay, O.O. Approach to venous diseases in the elderly. Turk Kardiyol. Dern. Ars. 2017, 45, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Robinson, S.M. Improving nutrition to support healthy ageing: What are the opportunities for intervention? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2018, 77, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Shlisky, J.; Bloom, D.E.; Beaudreault, A.R.; Tucker, K.L.; Keller, H.H.; Freund-Levi, Y.; Fielding, R.A.; Cheng, F.W.; Jensen, G.L.; Wu, D.; et al. Nutritional considerations for healthy aging and reduction in age-related chronic disease. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Guillermo, J.; Avila, O.; Aguilar De Plata, A.C. Impact of oxidative stress during pregnancy on fetal epigenetic patterns and early origin of vascular diseases. Nutr. Rev. 2015, 73, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A general overview of the anatomy, physiology, and histology of venous system in the lower limbs. Superficial veins, mainly represented by the great and small saphenous veins, carry blood from the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Superficial veins might transport the blood through the saphenous junctions and the perforator veins to the deep venous system, the major contributors of the venous return. Deep veins are accompanied by an artery, nerves, and skeletal muscle at both sides, surrounded by a fascial compartment. Calf muscle pump is the most important source to assure an appropriated blood return from the lower limbs and it is frequently designed as the “peripheral heart”. Venous return is also permitted by the presence of venous valves, which are essential to prevent blood reflux. The cytoarchitecture of the vein comprises three main layers, intima, media, and adventitia, with unique properties.
Figure 1. A general overview of the anatomy, physiology, and histology of venous system in the lower limbs. Superficial veins, mainly represented by the great and small saphenous veins, carry blood from the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Superficial veins might transport the blood through the saphenous junctions and the perforator veins to the deep venous system, the major contributors of the venous return. Deep veins are accompanied by an artery, nerves, and skeletal muscle at both sides, surrounded by a fascial compartment. Calf muscle pump is the most important source to assure an appropriated blood return from the lower limbs and it is frequently designed as the “peripheral heart”. Venous return is also permitted by the presence of venous valves, which are essential to prevent blood reflux. The cytoarchitecture of the vein comprises three main layers, intima, media, and adventitia, with unique properties.
Jcm 10 03239 g001
Figure 2. A general view on the different etiological mechanisms of CVD. Primary CVD (left) is caused by different genetic and environmental factors and it is characterized by a persistent venous hypertension responsible for the onset and progression of the disease. Secondary CVD (middle) is preceded by a pathological event, which could be intravenous (DVT) or extravenous (e.g., calf muscle dysfunction, extrinsic tumoral mass or arterial compression). Congenital CVD (right) represent a small percentage of the problem, and it is caused by single gene mutations or chromosomic aberrations.
Figure 2. A general view on the different etiological mechanisms of CVD. Primary CVD (left) is caused by different genetic and environmental factors and it is characterized by a persistent venous hypertension responsible for the onset and progression of the disease. Secondary CVD (middle) is preceded by a pathological event, which could be intravenous (DVT) or extravenous (e.g., calf muscle dysfunction, extrinsic tumoral mass or arterial compression). Congenital CVD (right) represent a small percentage of the problem, and it is caused by single gene mutations or chromosomic aberrations.
Jcm 10 03239 g002
Figure 3. Biomechanical and biochemical alterations in CVD. As showed, ambulatory venous hypertension promotes a set of changes in the vascular wall, leading to a < n altered shear stress. The altered hemodynamic damage the endothelium, enhancing capillary permeability, leukocytes recruitment, lymphatic impairment, and edema formation. The microcirculatory dysfunction associated with these changes creates a hypoxic environment, and together with the inflammatory environment provide a extracellular matrix remodeling, eventually resulting in different venous wall compositions, reduced elasticity and extensibility, and venous fibrosis. This cycle is responsible for maintain and aggravate venous hypertension, getting worse with valve incompetence, reflux, and abnormal functioning of the calf muscle pump. Overall, these mechanisms are responsible for the progression of VVs to the most serious manifestations, such as skin changes and ulcerations.
Figure 3. Biomechanical and biochemical alterations in CVD. As showed, ambulatory venous hypertension promotes a set of changes in the vascular wall, leading to a < n altered shear stress. The altered hemodynamic damage the endothelium, enhancing capillary permeability, leukocytes recruitment, lymphatic impairment, and edema formation. The microcirculatory dysfunction associated with these changes creates a hypoxic environment, and together with the inflammatory environment provide a extracellular matrix remodeling, eventually resulting in different venous wall compositions, reduced elasticity and extensibility, and venous fibrosis. This cycle is responsible for maintain and aggravate venous hypertension, getting worse with valve incompetence, reflux, and abnormal functioning of the calf muscle pump. Overall, these mechanisms are responsible for the progression of VVs to the most serious manifestations, such as skin changes and ulcerations.
Jcm 10 03239 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of molecular changes induced in venous structure resulting in different biophysical properties. As previously described altered (mostly decreased) shear stress and venous hypertension are responsible for the venous wall remodeling in VVs, influencing a plethora of molecular pathways. An increased level of hydroxyproline, reduced protective endothelial glycocalyx, altered calcium signaling, imbalance in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors, enhance ECM degradation and augmented nitric oxide are the most important effects described. Collectively, these alterations are responsible for modifications in collagen and elastic fibers, venous wall permeability, disrupted vessel morphology, and functioning and multiple defects associated to the progression of CVD. Legend: Up black arrow= Increased expression; Down black arrow: Decreased expression; ≠: Differential detection.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of molecular changes induced in venous structure resulting in different biophysical properties. As previously described altered (mostly decreased) shear stress and venous hypertension are responsible for the venous wall remodeling in VVs, influencing a plethora of molecular pathways. An increased level of hydroxyproline, reduced protective endothelial glycocalyx, altered calcium signaling, imbalance in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors, enhance ECM degradation and augmented nitric oxide are the most important effects described. Collectively, these alterations are responsible for modifications in collagen and elastic fibers, venous wall permeability, disrupted vessel morphology, and functioning and multiple defects associated to the progression of CVD. Legend: Up black arrow= Increased expression; Down black arrow: Decreased expression; ≠: Differential detection.
Jcm 10 03239 g004
Figure 5. Future directions for CVD. The emergence of novel therapeutic or diagnostic methods are playing a key role in the clinical management of the patients with CVD. However, it is equally important to “deep” on the epigenetic and individual mechanisms, to allow for better comprehension of the disease, opening the possibilities of novel translational approaches. Perhaps one of the most disregarded and important factors are encompassed around prevention. In this sense, nutritional assessment and physical exercise could be powerful tools in the handle of patients affected by CVD, as they might favorably regulate clinical signs, pathophysiological mechanisms, such as inflammation or oxidative stress, and even psychological variables. Overall, these points will be crucial to improve the QOL of the patients, which might be particularly vulnerable by other variables (e.g., pregnant women or elder people).
Figure 5. Future directions for CVD. The emergence of novel therapeutic or diagnostic methods are playing a key role in the clinical management of the patients with CVD. However, it is equally important to “deep” on the epigenetic and individual mechanisms, to allow for better comprehension of the disease, opening the possibilities of novel translational approaches. Perhaps one of the most disregarded and important factors are encompassed around prevention. In this sense, nutritional assessment and physical exercise could be powerful tools in the handle of patients affected by CVD, as they might favorably regulate clinical signs, pathophysiological mechanisms, such as inflammation or oxidative stress, and even psychological variables. Overall, these points will be crucial to improve the QOL of the patients, which might be particularly vulnerable by other variables (e.g., pregnant women or elder people).
Jcm 10 03239 g005
Table 1. Last revision of CEAP classification on CVD.
Table 1. Last revision of CEAP classification on CVD.
Clinical (C) ClassificationEtiologic (E) ClassificationAnatomic (A) ClassificationPathophysiologic (P) Classification
C0
No visible or palpable signs of venous disease
C1
Telangiectasias or reticular veins
C2
Varicose veins
C2r
Recurrent varicose veins
C3
Edema
C4
Changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue secondary to CVD
C4a
Pigmentation or eczema
C4b
Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche
C4c
Corona phlebectatica
C5
Healed
C6
Active venous ulcer
C6r
Recurrent active venous ulcer
Ep
Primary
Es
Secondary
Esi
Secondary—intravenous
Ese
Secondary—extravenous
Ec
Congenital
En
No cause identified
As
Superficial
Old
New Description
1.
Tel Telangiectasia
1.
Ret Reticular veins
2.
GSVa Great saphenous vein above knee
3.
GSVb Great saphenous vein below knee
4.
SSV Small saphenous vein
AASV
Anterior accessory saphenous vein
5.
NSV Nonsaphenous vein
Ad
Deep
6.
IVC Inferior vena cava
7.
CIV Common iliac vein
8.
IIV Internal iliac vein
9.
EIV External iliac vein
10.
PELV Pelvic veins
11.
CFV Common femoral vein
12.
DFV Deep femoral vein
13.
FV Femoral vein
14.
POPV Popliteal vein
15.
TIBV Crural (tibial) vein
15.
PRV Peroneal vein
15.
ATV Anterior tibial vein
15.
PTV Posterior tibial vein
16.
MUSV Muscular veins
16.
GAV Gastrocnemius vein
16.
SOV Soleal vein
Ap
Perforator
17.
TPV Thigh perforator vein
18.
CPV Calf perforator vein
An
No venous anatomic location identified
Pr
Reflux
Po
Obstruction
Pr,o
Reflux and obstruction
Pn
No pathophysiology identified
CEAP: clinical–etiology–anatomy–pathophysiology; CVD: Chronic venous disease.
Table 2. Principal causal genes associated to CVD. ECM = Extracellular matrix, VV = Varicose veins.
Table 2. Principal causal genes associated to CVD. ECM = Extracellular matrix, VV = Varicose veins.
GeneWhole NameChromosome and LocationVariant(s) (rs ID)Risk AlleleMutationHighlighted Associated Function(Possible) Implication in CVD Etiology/PathogenesisReferences
KCNH8Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 8chr3:19293203 (3p24.3)rs727139A > G-Smooth muscle contractionVenous dilation and VV formation[237]
EFEMP1EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1chr2:55868859rs17278665C > G-Cell adhesion and migrationRemodeling of ECM components and changes in vessel elasticity by altering the expression of MMPs and TIMPs[238]
MMP-9Matrix Metallopeptidase 9chr20q11.2-q13.1--ECM degradationCollagen type I degradation entailing stiffness of vein[239]
TIMP-2Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2chr17q25.3.--Inhibition of MMPsLower expression implies higher collagen degradation by MMPs[239]
CASZ1Castor zinc finger 1chr1:10765520 Intron 1rs11121615 C > T-Transcription factor for EGFLD7Angiogenesis stimulation and aberrant vascular assembly[241]
PIEZO1Piezo type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1chr16:88769137 (16q24.3) rs2911463 G > A/G > C/G > TShear stress sensing by Ca2+Impaired function implies aberrant vascular structure, ECs reorganization and edema[242,243,244,245]
PPP3R1Protein phosphatase 3 regulatory subunit B, alphachr 2:68262089
(2p14)
Intergenic
rs2861819 G > A/G > C-Ca2+ sensitivityAbnormal vascular integrity[43]
EBF1Early B Cell Factor Transcription Factor 1chr5:158803005rs11135046G > A/G > T-Adhesion and migration in early B lymphopoiesisPossible epigenetic reprogramming and B cells activation[247,248]
GATA2GATA Binding Protein 2chr3:128578726rs9880192G > A/G > C-Lymphatic vessel valve developmentImpaired function implies lymphedema[240,249]
NFATC2Nuclear Factor of Activated T cells 2chr20:51541298
chr20:51538108
rs3787184
and
rs12625547
A > G
T > G
-Induces immune response or inflammation in vascular remodelingNot well understood; Acting in consonance with FOXC2 and GJC2.[248,250]
FOXC2Fork-head box protein C216q24 --Critical product in developmental processes Inactivation implies abnormal shear stress sensing and valve incompetence[251,252]
GJC2Gap junction gamma-21q41-q42--Implicated in the gap junctions between cells Cell-cell junction defects and valve incompetence[251]
STIM2Stromal interaction molecule 24:26857601-27025381 (4p15.2)
Intergenic variant Mapped gene(s): STIM2, TBC1D19
rs28558138G > C-Controls Ca2+ concentration in cytosolHigher Ca2+ deposition[250,253]
HFEHomeostatic iron regulatorchr6:26090951
chr6:26267527
rs1799945
and
rs7773004
C > G
C > T
A > C/A > G/A > T
Regulates hepcidin expression, involved in iron storageIron overload implies endothelial dysfunction. Moreover, activation of MMPs and inhibition of TIMPs, deposits of iron, RBCs extravasation[254,255,256]
SOX9SRY-Box Transcription Factor 917:72032304
17q24.3
rs2241173A > C
A > G
-ECM remodelingInfluenced by TGF-β1may involve higher Ca2+ deposition[24,257,258]
COL2A1Collagen type II alpha 1 chain12:47793818
(12q13.11)
rs73107980 C > G C > T-Coding collagen type II alpha 1Abnormal modelling of ECM[239]
COL1A2Collagen type I alpha 2 chainchr7:94431047-94431048rs3917(indels)-Coding collagen type I alpha 2 Collagen dysregulation, higher susceptibility to CVI[259]
THBDThrombomodulin20p11.21 --Related with thromboembolic diseasesProthrombotic markers[43]
MTHFRMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase1p36.22--Related with thromboembolic diseasesProthrombotic markers[43]
Table 3. Medical therapies, uses, and level of evidence of current available treatments in patients with CVD.
Table 3. Medical therapies, uses, and level of evidence of current available treatments in patients with CVD.
TreatmentUsesLevel of Evidence and Recommendation
Compression therapy (stockings, bandages, adjustable compression wraps)Initial therapeutical method of CVD
A powerful tool in CVI ulceration
Increase the efficacy after interventional procedures
IB [303]
IB [305]
IA [307,308]
Pharmacological therapiesVenotonics to ameliorate early symptoms (Pain, edema)
Flavonoids and derivates as complement therapy with compression stockings in venous ulcers
IIaA [310]
IIaA [311,316]
SclerotherapySecond-line treatment for patients who are not candidates for endovenous ablation or surgery
First-line therapy in patients with recurrent CVD and fragile patients with venous ulceration
IA [319]
IIaB [320]
Endovenous thermal ablationFirst line therapy for patients with CVD and great saphenous vein refluxIA [318,328]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop