Next Article in Journal
Experience of Patients with Diabetes and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Health Professionals and Healthcare in Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Clinical Scoring for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Emergency Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Previous Article in Journal
Bevacizumab Arrests Osteoarthritis Progression in a Rabbit Model: A Dose-Escalation Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impella CP Implantation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Experience
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 13
10.3390/jcm10132829
Review Report
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Cangrelor Use in Routine Practice: A Two-Center Experience

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(13), 2829; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132829
by Niels M. R. van der Sangen 1, Ho Yee Cheung 1, Niels J. W. Verouden 2, Yolande Appelman 2, Marcel A. M. Beijk 1, Bimmer E. P. M. Claessen 1, Ronak Delewi 1, Paul Knaapen 2, Jorrit S. Lemkes 2, Alexander Nap 2, M. Marije Vis 1, Wouter J. Kikkert 1,3 and José P. S. Henriques 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sergio Coccheri
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(13), 2829; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132829
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 18 June 2021 / Accepted: 24 June 2021 / Published: 26 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Acute Coronary Syndromes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Interesting description of the use of Cangrelor. The obvious limitations (small number of patients, no control etc are well noted by the reviewers) 

just 2 minor issues:

L 39 should be "is the only....."

L61 not clear what the authors mean with patients undergoing CAG or PCI. Probably they mean PCI only.

I find the bleeding rate rather high and I am worried about this 1 patient with ICH. Please address this in the discussion and report rates (especially ICH) with the use of cangrelor

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a retrospective, registry based, non-comparative study, conducted in two centers in the Netherlands, aimed at describing the management indications and problems of a relatively new anti-platelet agent belonging to the P2Y12 inhibitors class. The agent is available only in the intravenous form and is  characterized by a very fast onset of its anti-aggregation activity and a fast disappearance rate due to short half-life. Cangrelor was used by Authors only in STEMI patients, especially if oral agents could not be used owing to severe conditions, and was associated to other antithrombotic medications as low dose Aspirin and variable use of low molecular heparin or fandaparinux. Authors report these protocols in the text. Authors recognize the weakpoints of their study: the relatively low number of patients (compensated by their severe conditions), and especially the lack of a control group that prevents an accurate  comparison, especially because patients received other antithrombotic agents.

However, Authors believe that early Cangrelor treatment may have reduced the incidence especially of early coronary re-occlusion, an effect that is credible given the characteristics of the agent.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop