Next Article in Journal
Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Common Hypertriglyceridemia Genetic Variants in Patients with Systemic Erythematosus Lupus
Next Article in Special Issue
Timing of Bisphosphonate (Alendronate) Initiation after Surgery for Fragility Fracture: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Integrative Psychotherapeutic Group Treatment Compared to Self-Help Groups in Functional Vertigo/Dizziness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bone Effect and Safety of One-Year Denosumab Therapy in a Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients: An Observational Monocentric Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm10102217
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TRAP5b and RANKL/OPG Predict Bone Pathology in Patients with Gaucher Disease

by
Margarita Ivanova
*,
Julia Dao
,
Lauren Noll
,
Jacqueline Fikry
and
Ozlem Goker-Alpan
*
Lysosomal & Rare Disorders Research and Treatment Center, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(10), 2217; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102217
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 13 May 2021 / Accepted: 19 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osteoporosis and Related Bone Metabolic Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and objective: Bone involvement occurs in 75% of patients with Gaucher disease (GD), and comprises structural changes, debilitating pain, and bone density abnormalities. Osteoporosis is a silent manifestation of GD until a pathologic fracture occurs. Thus, early diagnosis is crucial for identifying high-risk patients in order to prevent irreversible complications. Methods: Thirty-three patients with GD were assessed prospectively to identify predictive markers associated with bone density abnormalities, osteopenia (OSN), and osteoporosis (OSR). Subjects were categorized into three cohorts based on T- or Z-scores of bone mineral density (BMD). The first GD cohort consisted of those with no bone complications (Z-score ≥ −0.9; T-scores ≥ −1), the second was the OSN group (−1.8 ≥ Z-score ≥ −1; −2.5 ≥ T-score ≥ −1), and the third was the OSR group (Z-score ≤ −1.9; T-scores ≤ −2.5). Serum levels of TRAP5b, RANKL, OPG, and RANK were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: TRAP5b levels were increased in GD patients, and showed a positive correlation with GD biomarkers, including plasma glucosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb1) and macrophage activation markers CCL18 and chitotriosidase. The highest level of TRAP5b was measured in patients with osteoporosis. The elevation of RANKL and RANKL/OPG ratio correlated with osteopenia in GD. Conclusion: TRAP5b, RANKL, and RANKL/OPG elevation indicate osteoclast activation in GD. TRAP5b is a potential bone biomarker for GD with the ability to predict the progression of bone density abnormalities.

1. Introduction

Gaucher disease (GD), the most common lysosomal storage disorder, is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase) and the progressive accumulation of its substrate, glycosylceramide (GC), in various tissues and organs of the reticuloendothelial system [1]. GD affects monocyte lineage cells, primarily the macrophages, which play an essential role in bone metabolism, osteoclast differentiation, osteoclasts-osteoblasts interactions, and bone remodeling. Bone involvement in GD ranges from osteonecrosis to reduced bone density and developmental and structural bone abnormalities.
The progressive bone disease occurs in 75% of patients with type 1 GD, and signs and symptoms include structural bone changes, debilitating bone pain, and osteoporosis [2]. In addition to the extensive inflammatory response against GC and its toxic metabolite glucosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb1), GD bone pathology is possibly the result of the alterations in osteoclast function and osteoblast participation in bone remodeling and osteoclast differentiation [3]. Moreover, local GC accumulation affects osteoclast-osteoblast communication and mediates bone abnormalities [4,5,6].
Reduced bone density leads to progressive osteopenia and osteoporosis, and the aberrations in bone structure lead to abnormal vertebral remodeling and bone modeling, including Erlenmeyer flask deformity. Other bone structural abnormalities in GD include osteonecrosis and lytic lesions [3,7].
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) is an enzyme coded by ACP5, and is expressed in osteoclasts, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Two isoforms of TRAP circulate in the blood, TRAP5a secreted from macrophages and dendritic cells, and TRAP5b from osteoclasts. TRAP5b is a marker of osteoclast activity and indicators of bone resorption [8]. Moreover, the activator of TRAP5b expression, cathepsin K, is highly expressed in osteoclasts and has been shown to participate in bone resorption in GD [9]. Although elevated TRAP5b has previously been reported in GD, the limited number of patients included in this study prevented any further conclusions about its significance from being reached [10].
Among the essential factors that regulate bone turnover are the receptor activator of NF-kB (RANK), its ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG), the receptor that binds to RANKL [9,11,12]. The cellular response to RANKL is contingent on the level of its receptor RANK and the presence of OPG [11]. RANKL and OPG are primarily involved in maintaining bone density. Given that bone is an organ with a slow turnover, and that bone mineral density (BMD) measurement in the short term does not provide enough information about prognosis, biomarkers will be valuable for the early assessment of bone density abnormalities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The study was conducted under an IRB approved protocol (NCT04055831) and included 33 subjects with GD (eight males and 25 females, age range 18 to 68 years, mean 41 ± 15) and 15 healthy controls (nine males and six females with an average age of 48 ± 11 years) (Supplemental Table S1). Ethics committees and data protection agencies approved the clinical protocol, and all subjects provided written informed consent for the collection of samples and analysis of their data. GD diagnosis was based on GCase residual activity and GBA molecular analysis. Participants were further categorized into three cohorts based on the T- or Z-score of BMD. The cohort designated ‘normal’ (N) included nine subjects without any bone complications and a normal BMD with a Z-score ≥ −0.9 or T-score ≥ −1. The osteopenia (OSN) group included 10 subjects with a Z score of −1 to −1.8 or a T-score of −1 to −2.5. The osteoporosis (OSR) group included 14 subjects with a Z score ≤ −1.9 or a T-score ≤ −2.5 (Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1).

2.2. The Clinical Features of Bone Disease in GD Cohorts

Details of medical history with bone disease characteristics such as bone surgery, pathologic fractures, bone pain, bone marrow infiltration, EM-flask deformity, and osteonecrosis are listed in Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1. Demographic characteristics, genotypes, and relevant molecular analyses are summarized in Supplemental Tables S2 and S3.

2.3. Measurement of Biomarkers in Plasma Samples

Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes. Plasma levels of bone markers were measured using commercially available ELISA kits. The concentration of TRAP5b was measured in 50 µL of plasma using TRAP5b ELISA kit (Quidel, San Diego, CA, USA). Recombinant TRAP5b was used for calibration, and the range of the assay was 0–16.5 U/L. The concentration of OPG and RANKL was measured in 100 µL of plasma using OPG and RANKL ELISA kits (Origene Technologies Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). Recombinant OPG was used as a standard, and the range of the assay was 0–6000 pg/mL. The RANKL range of the assay was 0–5000 pg/mL. The RANK concentration was measured in 100 µL of plasma using the RANK ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Recombinant RANK was used as a standard, the range of the assay was 0–10 ng/mL, and the analytical sensitivity was 0.054 ng/mL.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Prizm (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between the two groups were tested by Student’s t-test or F-test. The groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Brown-Forsythe, Bartlett’s multiple-comparison, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Pearson’s test, one or two tails, was used for correlation analysis. The value of p < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant result.

3. Results

3.1. Bone Pain Is Associated with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis in GD

Overall and individual characteristics of bone involvement in subjects with GD are given in Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1. Bone pain was more common in the OSR group (71%) compared to the N (44%) and OSN groups (40%) (Table 1). Increased frequency of pathological bone fractures and bone surgeries correlated with the progression of OSN and OSR (Table 1). However, the incidence of bone marrow infiltration, EM-flask deformity, and osteonecrosis were not associated with abnormal bone density, or with OSN or OSR pathology (Table 1).

3.2. TRAP5b Is Increased in GD and Correlates with Osteoporosis

TRAP5b is a marker of the number of active osteoclasts and an indicator of bone resorption. To examine the role of TRAP5b in GD, the peripheral levels of TRAP5b were measured. TRAP5b was significantly higher in the GD group than in the healthy controls (Figure 1A). Further analysis demonstrated that TRAP5b correlated with the progression of osteopenia towards osteoporosis (Figure 1B). TRAP5b was significantly higher in the OSR than in the OSN and N cohorts.
Furthermore, the finding that TRAP5b is elevated in GD patients remained unchanged after stratifying by gender (Supplemental Figure S1A). eight out of ten GD women and three out of four GD men with osteoporosis showed elevated levels of TRAP5b. (Supplemental Figure S1A). Taken together, these data indicate that plasma TRAP5b may be a clinically relevant marker for the evaluation of bone resorption in GD patients. There was no correlation between TRAP5b levels for different treatment modalities, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), substrate reduction therapy (SRT), or treatment duration.

3.3. RANKL, Not RANK Is Elevated in GD and Correlates with Osteopenia

RANKL is highly expressed by osteoblasts and osteocytes. RANKL binds to its receptor (RANK) and activates osteoclasts’ differentiation and maturation, favoring bone resorption [11,13]. Analysis of control plasma and plasma from GD subjects demonstrated that the level of RANKL was significantly higher in GD (Figure 2A). Comparing RANKL in controls and GD cohorts showed a significant increase in RANKL level in the OSN cohort compared with the N and OSR cohorts (Figure 2B). RANKL level was elevated in GD females with OSN (5/8) and in two women (2/10) with OSR (Supplemental Figure S1B). Three males with GD presented with the highest level of RANKL, one patient without bone complications and two patients with OSN. Five subjects with osteoporosis were treated with denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the RANK ligand. RANKL level was elevated in one of five patients treated with denosumab (Supplemental Figure S1B). Correlation between type or duration of Gaucher disease specific treatment and RANKL was not observed. Overall, these results show that plasma RANKL is a potential marker for OSN in GD.
RANKL binds to the receptor activator of NF-kB (RANK) to induce osteoclastogenesis [11]. RANK is mainly expressed in osteoclast precursors, mature osteoclasts, dendritic cells, macrophages, and microglia. Surprisingly, despite being a membrane receptor, RANK was detectable in the serum of GD subjects. However, the measurement of plasma RANK showed no differences between the controls and GD patients (Figure 3A). Further analysis in three different GD cohorts did not show an association between RANK and the progression of bone density abnormalities (Figure 3B).

3.4. Elevated OPG Does Not Correlate with OSN or OSR in GD

The decoy receptor for RANKL (OPG) is produced by osteoblasts. OPG binds RANKL and blocks RANKL activation, reducing the number of osteoclasts [14]. Plasma OPG was elevated in 15 out of 33 (46%) GD patients, and the average of OPG in GD was higher compared with healthy controls (Figure 4A). Further analysis, however, demonstrated that OPG did not correlate with osteopenia or osteoporosis (Figure 4B). The majority of patients with the highest level of OPG belonged to two cohorts: no bone complication (5 out of 8 patients) or OSN (5 out of 9 patients). After stratification for gender and treatment, there was no difference in OPG levels. (Supplemental Figure S1C).

3.5. RANKL/OPG Ratio Is Higher in Patients with GD

Alterations of the RANKL/OPG balance have been characterized in a wide range of bone diseases, including osteoporosis [13]. Therefore, in addition to RANKL and OPG analysis, we calculated the RANKL/OPG ratio. Similar to RANKL and OPG, the RANKL/OPG ratio was higher in GD compared to controls (Figure 5A). Further analysis showed an increased RANKL/OPG ratio in the OSN cohort. Tukey’s multiple-comparison test demonstrated significant differences between control vs. OSN groups (Figure 5B). The observation that RANKL/OPG ratio is higher in GD patients, especially in patients with osteopenia, remained the same for males and females (Supplemental Figure S1D).

3.6. The Relationship between TRAP5b, RANKL, and OPG in GD

Correlation analysis of RANKL/OPG/TRAP5b levels in GD patients with no bone complications (N) showed an increased level of TRAP5b and OPG, but not RANKL. From the GD-N cohort, only one patient had an elevated level of RANKL; however, this patient had a high level of OPG and a TRAP5b level comparable to the average control level (Figure 6A,B and Supplemental Figure S2).
Scatterplot analysis of the relationship between RANKL and OPG demonstrated that some samples from the OSN cohort with higher RANKL also showed increased OPG levels (Figure 6A and Supplemental Figure S2). Since RANKL promotes osteoclastogenesis, the elevated level of serum RANKL and the decreased level of OPG indicate accelerating osteoclast activation, resulting in osteoporosis progression. Scatterplot TRAP5b vs. RANKL demonstrates that TRAP5b is higher in the OSN cohort with an elevated RANKL and normal OPG (Figure 6B,C and Supplemental Figure S2). Thus, these data suggest that an increased level of OPG inhibits osteoclast activity in GD patients with osteopenia.
In the GD cohort with OSR, the RANKL and OPG levels were similar to control and GD-N cohorts, except for one patient with a high RANKL and three patients with high OPG only (Figure 6B and Supplemental Figure S2). There was no direct correlation between TRAP5b and RANKL or OPG levels in GD-OSR (Figure 6C,D). Because osteoclast activity is significantly greater than osteoblast activity in osteoporotic tissue [15], the significantly increased level of TRAP5b, but not RANKL or OPG, might be associated with a shift to osteoporosis in GD.
Among the five patients treated with denosumab, two (P6 and P10) had normal RANKL, OPG, and TRAP5b levels (Figure 6B–D). Three (P5, P7, P8), meanwhile, had an elevated TRAP5b, and two patients had increased OPG.

3.7. TRAP5b Positively Correlates with GD Biomarkers: CCL18, Chitotriosidase, and Lyso-Gb1

We next analyzed the correlation between circulating TRAP5b, RANKL, and OPG, and GD biomarkers chitotriosidase (CHITO), lyso-Gb1, and chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) in all GD patients. CCL18 and CHITO are secreted by activated macrophages, and lyso-Gb1 represents the circulating metabolite derived from the deacylation of Gb1 [16,17,18]. A positive linear correlation was observed between CHITO, lyso-Gb1, and CCL18 (Supplemental Figure S3). TRAP5b showed a significant positive correlation with CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and CHITO (Figure 7 and Supplemental Figure S4). Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between OPG and CHITO in the majority of GD patients with abnormal bone density (OSN and OSR) (Supplemental Figure S4), with the exception of two OSR patients who had incredibly high levels of CHITO and an elevated level of OPG (Supplemental Figure S4I). A negative correlation was observed between OPG and lyso-Gb1 in GD patients with OSN (Table 2). In comparison, there was no correlation between RANKL and GD biomarkers.

4. Discussion

Progressive bone disease is one of the primary untreated aspects of Gaucher disease. The majority of GD patients had structural bone involvement, and 43% had bone pain [19]. Bone metabolism, including turnover, remodeling, and mineralization, are affected in GD. One of GD’s early signs involving bone pathology is the ‘Erlenmeyer flask’ deformity that affects long bones and abnormality of bone modeling. Later, the majority of GD patients develop skeletal complications, including osteopenia and osteoporosis [3]. GD patients with skeletal involvement could be asymptomatic or present symptoms such as pain, pathological fractures, cystic changes, or osteonecrosis. ‘Erlenmeyer flask’ deformity occurs during tubular and long bone growth [20], and can be the initial diagnostic sign in many patients. With GD, in our cohort, the ‘Erlenmeyer flask’ deformity did not correlate with OSN or OSR, suggesting different pathological pathways leading to abnormal bone remodeling and bone mineralization. However, in our study, an increasing number of GD patients with bone pain and bone fractures correlated with osteoporosis, suggesting similar underlying mechanisms for both. As is well known, multiple chronic immune and inflammatory disorders are associated with bone density abnormalities and accompanying pain [21].
While bone involvement is common in GD, there are no peripheral bone-related biomarkers in clinical use that could assist with therapeutic planning and clinical management. Our study’s main conclusion is that TRAP5b is a biomarker that correlates with the progression of osteopenia to osteoporosis in GD. Excess osteoclastic bone resorption over osteoblastic bone formation leads to bone mineral loss and the development of osteopenia and osteoporosis [20]. The bone marker, TRAP5b, is a marker of osteoclast activation and reflects the number of active osteoclasts [8,22]. Two isoforms of TRAP circulate in the blood, TRAP5a and TRAP5b. TRAP5a is a biomarker of systemic inflammation [23], and TRAP5b is a biomarker of bone resorption. The development of specific TRAP5a and TRAP5b antibodies has made it possible to separate clinically relevant biomarkers for osteoclasts and inflammatory macrophages [24].
Interestingly, total TRAP, not TRAP5b, has been used as a biomarker for GD along with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), CHITO, and ferritin, all of which are markers for activated macrophages [25]. Moreover, total TRAP, along with CHITO, ferritin, and ACE, is included in routine clinical monitoring of GD activity [26]. Our results demonstrate that higher TRAP5b levels correlate with OSN (3.1 ± 1.8) and OSR (4.2 ± 2.2) progression in GD. Similar to TRAP5b, cathepsin K is also secreted predominantly by activated osteoclasts [27,28]. Moreover, two studies demonstrated that cathepsin K increases in GD1 [29,30]. Thus, enhanced TRAP5b expression and cathepsin K activation confirm osteoclast activation in GD patients. Overall, our findings suggest that serum TRAP5b is a promising new biomarker with clinical relevance in GD, and evaluation of osteopenia–osteoporosis progression.
Circulating TRAP5b positively correlates with clinical biomarkers of GD pathology: CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and CHITO. We think that this finding is relevant to understanding the pattern of events that occurs in GD bones. Because the significant correlation was verified between TRAP5b and lyso-Gb1, and correlations between lyso-Gb1, CHITO are CCL18 have been observed in several clinical studies [18], we postulate that lyso-Gb1 is the primary contributor to TRAP5b activation, not CHITO or CCL18. A possible mechanism underlying activation expression of TRAP5 in osteoclasts is Gb1 accumulation in bone marrow cells, including monocytes/macrophages precursors cells, and osteoclasts. An analysis of osteoblasts differentiated from a GD1 patient’s bone marrow demonstrated that exogenous lyso-Gb1 reduced mesenchymal cell viability for osteoblast differentiation and reduced osteoblast calcium deposition [6]. At the same time, an analysis of osteoclasts showed an increase in osteoclast generation of 37% in GD. Thus, increased osteoclast number and activity with reducing osteoblast activity lead to osteoclast/osteoblast disbalance in GD [6]. The alternative pathway of osteoclast activation is via inflammatory pathways that lead to an augmented and systemic loss of bone mineral density [31]. A wide range of in vitro studies have shown that lyso-Gb1 is a pro-inflammatory agent in immune cells, including chronic B-cell and T-cell activation and gammopathy [32,33,34]. We suggest that TRAP5b could be used along with other GD biomarkers to assess bone density abnormalities and response to therapy.
The level of RANKL and OPG are essential factors that determine the number and activity of osteoclasts [11,35,36]. RANKL binds to RANK on the surface of the osteoclast precursor or mononuclear osteoclast and promotes osteoclast differentiation and maturation. OPG binds to RANKL and inhibits osteoclast differentiation. RANK is expressed in osteoclast precursors, mature osteoclasts, dendritic cells, macrophages, and microglia. The RANKL is highly expressed by osteoblasts, and to a much lesser degree in osteocytes. OPG is mainly expressed by osteoblasts [35]. Mature monocytes and macrophages have the ability to differentiate into osteoclasts, but these cells also secrete factors that impact osteoblast activity [37,38,39]. Because cells of monocytes/macrophage lineage are primarily affected in GD, it is not unexpected that bone morphogenesis and remodeling are impaired [3,40]. GD patients with active bone disease formed more osteoclasts than GD patients without bone disease [6,40,41]. Moreover, an in vitro inhibitory GD model that demonstrated that PBMC differentiated into osteoclasts at a higher rate support the finding that GD patients with active bone disease formed more osteoclasts [41]. Thus, the altered RANKL/RANK/OPG triad plays an integral role in GD bone pathology [3,18].
In the present study, RANKL was elevated in 51% of the patients with GD. However, elevated plasma RANKL only correlates with osteopenia, and not osteoporosis, suggesting that the acceleration of osteoclast differentiation occurs before the onset of osteoporosis. This finding may also represent the activation of osteoclastic bone resorption in patients with osteopenia. Furthermore, the majority of GD patients had an average serum OPG level, and only 41% presented with an elevated OPG. Patients with a high level of OPG either belonged to the N or OSN cohorts. This finding suggests that in the early stages of bone disease, OPG is expressed and inhibits RANKL activity. Overall, our data fit with a previous study that demonstrated the normal values for OPG in GD type 1 [42]. Accumulated findings indicate that OPG-related osteoclast activity is not a major mechanism of bone pathology in GD patients with relatively mild form [42]. However, there is still controversy regarding RANKL/OPG and its effects on GD bone pathology [43]. The genetic variability of OPG and RANK genes in GD may also play a role in the GD bone pathology with its response to treatment. Similar to the RANKL data, RANKL/OPG level was mostly elevated in the OSN group and positively correlated with RANKL. The higher level of RANKL and RANKL/OPG in patients with osteopenia has been observed in postmenopausal women [44]. RANKL/OPG ratio is often used as a biomarker of bone pathology, which reflects a balance of bone formation and resorption.
The close relationship between osteoporosis and chronic inflammation has been studied for many years. The most detailed observations of osteoclast-mediated bone loss during chronic inflammation are described for autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Osteoclast-mediated resorption at the interface between synovium and bone is responsible for the joint erosion seen in patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [45]. Inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and interleukins (IL-1, and Il-6)) may drive osteoclastic bone loss [45,46]. Synovial macrophages in RA overexpress these inflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, which has particularly pervasive effects on osteoclastogenesis by promoting RANKL production [46,47]. RANKL, in turn, promotes differentiation of synovial macrophages into osteoclasts [48]. Because Gb1 and lyso-Gb1 induce expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages, including TNFα, Il-6, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) [18], we suggest that inflammatory cytokines contribute to RANKL/OPG imbalance and thus promote osteoclastic bone resorption. The bone pain that also correlates with bone density abnormalities suggests the contribution of a systemic inflammatory response to GD-related bone disease [49].
A relatively small number of subjects and small cohort numbers for each GD is one of the limitations of this study, and thus, the results of linear regression analysis should be interpreted with caution. Also, in this study, we did not take into account the age of disease onset, disease course, or duration of GD therapy, which could have contributed to current observations in OSN and OSR cohorts.
ERT leads to a substantial improvement of hematological manifestation in GD; however, bone involvement is refractory to therapy [50]. Limited studies have evaluated bone biomarkers in untreated vs. ERT treated patients with inconsistent results. The lack of differences in serum OPG levels between naïve and ERT-treated patients suggested that OPG-related osteoclast activity may not be a significant contributor to GD bone pathology [42]. However, in another study, there were decreased OPG and RANKL/OPG levels in GD [10]. Our group has previously demonstrated that plasma RANKL and OPG levels decreased in SRT-treated patients over time, but RANKL/OPG did not change with the treatment status [51].
There is no standard treatment for osteopenia–osteoporosis progression in GD. The most common medications for osteoporosis and others bone diseases, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), prevent bone mass loss by inhibiting osteoclast resorption via inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase [52]. N-BPs, calcium, and vitamin D with a healthy lifestyle are standard recommendations for GD patients, especially for young patients [53,54]. Unfortunately, no clinical study using N-BPs in GD has been completed. While there are individual case reports, limited small patient series, and consensus statements on the use of N-BPs, there has not yet been a systemic study of this treatment modality in GD [53,55,56]. Emerging osteoporosis therapies utilize novel mechanisms, including monoclonal antibodies against RANKL, DKK1, and sclerostin [57]. The antibody against RANKL, denosumab, prevents osteoclast development through RANKL inhibition. In this study, five patients with OSR have been treated with denosumab; among those, four had normal RANKL, and one had borderline levels after receiving denosumab. Nevertheless, the majority of GD patients with elevated RANKL levels were patients with OSN. Currently, whether patients with osteopenia and an elevated RANKL but normal OPG levels have a higher risk of developing osteoporosis is not known. Similarly, the effects of denosumab in GD-related osteoporosis is yet to be studied [20].
This study furthers clinical knowledge regarding the circulating biomarkers (TRAP5, RANKL, RANK, and OPG), bone density, and osteoporosis progression in GD. We provide the first evidence that TRAP5b is a potential bone biomarker for GD with the ability to predict OSN and OSR progression. The pattern of elevation of RANKL and OPG provides additional evidence for the role of osteoclastic bone resorption in GD.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10102217/s1, Figure S1: TRAP5b and RANKL concentrations in controls and GD females vs. males, Figure S2: Scatterplots represent the correlation between RANKL, OPG, and TRAP5b, Figure S3: Scatterplots represent the correlation between Lyso-Gb1, CCL18, and chitotriosidase (CHITO) in all GD patients. Figure S4: Scatterplots represent the correlation between Lyso-Gb1, CCL18, chitotriosidase (CHITO) and bone biomarkers, Table S1: GD with bone pathology characteristics, Table S2: Demographic characteristics, Table S3: Genotype summary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I. and O.G.-A.; methodology, J.D., L.N. and J.F.; validation, M.I. and J.D.; formal analysis, M.I. and O.G.-A.; investigation, M.I. and O.G.-A.; resources, M.I. and O.G.-A.; data curation, M.I. and O.G.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.; writing—review and editing, O.G.-A. and J.D.; visualization, M.I.; supervision, M.I.; project administration, M.I.; funding acquisition, M.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Investigator-Initiated Award from Shire Pharmaceuticals USA, a member of the Takeda group of companies, IIR-US-002597 (to M.I.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Western Institutional Review Board Inc, (protocol code NCT04055831, 15 May 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the treatment center of LDRTC for recruiting patients and their help with sample collection. We thank Elizabeth Barski for reviewing the manuscript. The authors are grateful to all participating patients and their families.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pandey, M.K.; Grabowski, G.A. Immunological cells and functions in Gaucher disease. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2013, 18, 197–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Masi, L.; Brandi, M.L. Gaucher disease: The role of the specialist on metabolic bone diseases. Clin. Cases Min. Bone Metab. 2015, 12, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mucci, J.M.; Rozenfeld, P. Pathogenesis of Bone Alterations in Gaucher Disease: The Role of Immune System. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 192761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ersek, A.; Karadimitris, A.; Horwood, N.J. Effect of glycosphingolipids on osteoclastogenesis and osteolytic bone diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2012, 3, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mistry, P.K.; Liu, J.; Yang, M.; Nottoli, T.; McGrath, J.; Jain, D.; Zhang, K.; Keutzer, J.; Chuang, W.L.; Mehal, W.Z.; et al. Glucocerebrosidase gene-deficient mouse recapitulates Gaucher disease displaying cellular and molecular dysregulation beyond the macrophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19473–19478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Reed, M.C.; Schiffer, C.; Heales, S.; Mehta, A.B.; Hughes, D.A. Impact of sphingolipids on osteoblast and osteoclast activity in Gaucher disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 124, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ivanova, M.; Limgala, R.P.; Changsila, E.; Kamath, R.; Ioanou, C.; Goker-Alpan, O. Gaucheromas: When macrophages promote tumor formation and dissemination. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Halleen, J.M.; Alatalo, S.L.; Suominen, H.; Cheng, S.; Janckila, A.J.; Vaananen, H.K. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b: A novel serum marker of bone resorption. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1337–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuo, T.R.; Chen, C.H. Bone biomarker for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis: Recent developments and future perspectives. Biomark. Res. 2017, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Giuffrida, G.; Cingari, M.R.; Parrinello, N.; Romano, A.; Triolo, A.; Franceschino, M.; Di Raimondo, F. Bone turnover markers in patients with type 1 Gaucher disease. Hematol. Rep. 2012, 4, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Walsh, M.C.; Choi, Y. Biology of the RANKL-RANK-OPG System in Immunity, Bone, and Beyond. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pinzone, J.J.; Hall, B.M.; Thudi, N.K.; Vonau, M.; Qiang, Y.W.; Rosol, T.J.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr. The role of Dickkopf-1 in bone development, homeostasis, and disease. Blood 2009, 113, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Boyce, B.F.; Xing, L. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 473, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bi, H.; Chen, X.; Gao, S.; Yu, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, B.; Liu, X.; Dai, M. Key Triggers of Osteoclast-Related Diseases and Available Strategies for Targeted Therapies: A Review. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gruber, H.E.; Ivey, J.L.; Thompson, E.R.; Chesnut, C.H., 3rd; Baylink, D.J. Osteoblast and osteoclast cell number and cell activity in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 1986, 12, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Schraufstatter, I.U.; Zhao, M.; Khaldoyanidi, S.K.; Discipio, R.G. The chemokine CCL18 causes maturation of cultured monocytes to macrophages in the M2 spectrum. Immunology 2012, 135, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hollak, C.E.; van Weely, S.; van Oers, M.H.; Aerts, J.M. Marked elevation of plasma chitotriosidase activity. A novel hallmark of Gaucher disease. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 1288–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Revel-Vilk, S.; Fuller, M.; Zimran, A. Value of Glucosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb1) as a Biomarker in Gaucher Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wenstrup, R.J.; Roca-Espiau, M.; Weinreb, N.J.; Bembi, B. Skeletal aspects of Gaucher disease: A review. Br. J. Radiol. 2002, 75 (Suppl. 1), A2–A12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hughes, D.; Mikosch, P.; Belmatoug, N.; Carubbi, F.; Cox, T.; Goker-Alpan, O.; Kindmark, A.; Mistry, P.; Poll, L.; Weinreb, N.; et al. Gaucher Disease in Bone: From Pathophysiology to Practice. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2019, 34, 996–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iseme, R.A.; McEvoy, M.; Kelly, B.; Agnew, L.; Walker, F.R.; Attia, J. Is osteoporosis an autoimmune mediated disorder? Bone Rep. 2017, 7, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lv, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, W.; Tao, P.; Lv, X.; Wang, Y. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b is a marker of osteoclast number and volume in RAW 264.7 cells treated with receptor-activated nuclear kappaB ligand. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 9, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Janckila, A.J.; Slone, S.P.; Lear, S.C.; Martin, A.; Yam, L.T. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase as an immunohistochemical marker for inflammatory macrophages. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 127, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pradella, S.D.; Slone, S.P.; Wu, Y.Y.; Chao, T.Y.; Parthasarathy, R.N.; Yam, L.T.; Janckila, A.J. Applications and performance of monoclonal antibodies to human tartrate resistant acid phosphatase. J. Immunol. Methods 2011, 372, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Troy, K.; Cuttner, J.; Reilly, M.; Grabowski, G.; Desnick, R. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining of monocytes in Gaucher disease. Am. J. Hematol. 1985, 19, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stirnemann, J.; Belmatoug, N.; Vincent, C.; Fain, O.; Fantin, B.; Mentre, F. Bone events and evolution of biologic markers in Gaucher disease before and during treatment. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dai, R.; Wu, Z.; Chu, H.Y.; Lu, J.; Lyu, A.; Liu, J.; Zhang, G. Cathepsin K: The Action in and Beyond Bone. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goto, T.; Yamaza, T.; Tanaka, T. Cathepsins in the osteoclast. J. Electron. Microsc. 2003, 52, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moran, M.T.; Schofield, J.P.; Hayman, A.R.; Shi, G.P.; Young, E.; Cox, T.M. Pathologic gene expression in Gaucher disease: Up-regulation of cysteine proteinases including osteoclastic cathepsin K. Blood 2000, 96, 1969–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lobatoa, J.B.; Parejo, P.D.; Vázquez, R.J.; Jiménez, L.M. Cathepsin K as a biomarker of bone involvement in type 1 Gaucher disease. Med. Clín. 2015, 145, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Redlich, K.; Smolen, J.S. Inflammatory bone loss: Pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nair, S.; Boddupalli, C.S.; Verma, R.; Liu, J.; Yang, R.; Pastores, G.M.; Mistry, P.K.; Dhodapkar, M.V. Type II NKT-TFH cells against Gaucher lipids regulate B-cell immunity and inflammation. Blood 2015, 125, 1256–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lukas, J.; Cozma, C.; Yang, F.; Kramp, G.; Meyer, A.; Nesslauer, A.M.; Eichler, S.; Bottcher, T.; Witt, M.; Brauer, A.U.; et al. Glucosylsphingosine Causes Hematological and Visceral Changes in Mice-Evidence for a Pathophysiological Role in Gaucher Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nair, S.; Branagan, A.R.; Liu, J.; Boddupalli, C.S.; Mistry, P.K.; Dhodapkar, M.V. Clonal Immunoglobulin against Lysolipids in the Origin of Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cawley, K.M.; Bustamante-Gomez, N.C.; Guha, A.G.; MacLeod, R.S.; Xiong, J.; Gubrij, I.; Liu, Y.; Mulkey, R.; Palmieri, M.; Thostenson, J.D.; et al. Local Production of Osteoprotegerin by Osteoblasts Suppresses Bone Resorption. Cell Rep. 2020, 32, 108052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. O’Brien, C.A. Control of RANKL gene expression. Bone 2010, 46, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sinder, B.P.; Pettit, A.R.; McCauley, L.K. Macrophages: Their Emerging Roles in Bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2015, 30, 2140–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pirraco, R.P.; Reis, R.L.; Marques, A.P. Effect of monocytes/macrophages on the early osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2013, 7, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pereira, M.; Petretto, E.; Gordon, S.; Bassett, J.H.D.; Williams, G.R.; Behmoaras, J. Common signalling pathways in macrophage and osteoclast multinucleation. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Mucci, J.M.; Cuello, M.F.; Kisinovsky, I.; Larroude, M.; Delpino, M.V.; Rozenfeld, P.A. Proinflammatory and proosteoclastogenic potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Gaucher patients: Implication for bone pathology. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2015, 55, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Reed, M.; Baker, R.J.; Mehta, A.B.; Hughes, D.A. Enhanced differentiation of osteoclasts from mononuclear precursors in patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2013, 51, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Magal, I.; Lebel, E.; Altarescu, G.; Itzchaki, M.; Rudensky, B.; Foldes, A.J.; Zimran, A.; Elstein, D. Serum levels of osteoprotegerin and osteoprotegerin polymorphisms in Gaucher disease. Br. J. Haematol. 2006, 133, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zimmermann, A.; Popp, R.A.; Rossmann, H.; Bucerzan, S.; Nascu, I.; Leucuta, D.; Weber, M.M.; Grigorescu-Sido, P. Gene variants of osteoprotegerin, estrogen-, calcitonin- and vitamin D-receptor genes and serum markers of bone metabolism in patients with Gaucher disease type 1. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2018, 14, 2069–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Azizieh, F.Y.; Shehab, D.; Jarallah, K.A.; Gupta, R.; Raghupathy, R. Circulatory Levels of RANKL, OPG, and Oxidative Stress Markers in Postmenopausal Women With Normal or Low Bone Mineral Density. Biomark. Insights 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coury, F.; Peyruchaud, O.; Machuca-Gayet, I. Osteoimmunology of Bone Loss in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Weitzmann, M.N. The Role of Inflammatory Cytokines, the RANKL/OPG Axis, and the Immunoskeletal Interface in Physiological Bone Turnover and Osteoporosis. Science 2013, 2013, 125705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, J.; Hsu, H.C.; Mountz, J.D. Managing macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis by reform or removal. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2012, 14, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Takayanagi, H.; Oda, H.; Yamamoto, S.; Kawaguchi, H.; Tanaka, S.; Nishikawa, T.; Koshihara, Y. A new mechanism of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: Synovial fibroblasts induce osteoclastogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 240, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Devigili, G.; De Filippo, M.; Ciana, G.; Dardis, A.; Lettieri, C.; Rinaldo, S.; Macor, D.; Moro, A.; Eleopra, R.; Bembi, B. Chronic pain in Gaucher disease: Skeletal or neuropathic origin? Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Goker-Alpan, O. Therapeutic approaches to bone pathology in Gaucher disease: Past, present and future. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011, 104, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Limgala, R.P.; Goker-Alpan, O. Effect of Substrate Reduction Therapy in Comparison to Enzyme Replacement Therapy on Immune Aspects and Bone Involvement in Gaucher Disease. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kimmel, D.B. Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, and clinical applications of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cox, T.M.; Aerts, J.M.; Belmatoug, N.; Cappellini, M.D.; vom Dahl, S.; Goldblatt, J.; Grabowski, G.A.; Hollak, C.E.; Hwu, P.; Maas, M.; et al. Management of non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease with special reference to pregnancy, splenectomy, bisphosphonate therapy, use of biomarkers and bone disease monitoring. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2008, 31, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Giuffrida, G.; Cappellini, M.D.; Carubbi, F.; Di Rocco, M.; Iolascon, G. Management of bone disease in Gaucher disease type 1: Clinical practice. Adv. Ther. 2014, 31, 1197–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Khan, A.; Hanley, D.A.; McNeil, C.; Boyd, S. Improvement in Bone Mineral Density and Architecture in a Patient with Gaucher Disease Using Teriparatide. JIMD Rep. 2015, 22, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Dekker, N.; van Dussen, L.; Hollak, C.E.; Overkleeft, H.; Scheij, S.; Ghauharali, K.; van Breemen, M.J.; Ferraz, M.J.; Groener, J.E.; Maas, M.; et al. Elevated plasma glucosylsphingosine in Gaucher disease: Relation to phenotype, storage cell markers, and therapeutic response. Blood 2011, 118, e118–e127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tu, K.N.; Lie, J.D.; Wan, C.K.V.; Cameron, M.; Austel, A.G.; Nguyen, J.K.; Van, K.; Hyun, D. Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 43, 92–104. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 10 02217 g001 550
Figure 1. Plasma TRAP5b level. (A) TRAP5b level, GD (Gaucher disease) mean 3.4 ± 0.4, n = 33 vs. control mean 1.4 ± 0.1, n = 10, p < 0.05 unpaired t-test and F test. (B) TRAP5b concentrations in control and GD cohorts. GD and no bone complication (N, mean 2.6 ± 0.63), osteopenia (OSN, mean 3.1 ± 1.8), and osteoporosis (OSR, mean 4.2 ± 2.2). * p < 0.05; ANOVA, Brown-Forsythe, and Bartlett’s multiple-comparison test. Data are means ± SEM. Measurements are in units/50 μL.
Figure 1. Plasma TRAP5b level. (A) TRAP5b level, GD (Gaucher disease) mean 3.4 ± 0.4, n = 33 vs. control mean 1.4 ± 0.1, n = 10, p < 0.05 unpaired t-test and F test. (B) TRAP5b concentrations in control and GD cohorts. GD and no bone complication (N, mean 2.6 ± 0.63), osteopenia (OSN, mean 3.1 ± 1.8), and osteoporosis (OSR, mean 4.2 ± 2.2). * p < 0.05; ANOVA, Brown-Forsythe, and Bartlett’s multiple-comparison test. Data are means ± SEM. Measurements are in units/50 μL.
Jcm 10 02217 g001
Jcm 10 02217 g002 550
Figure 2. Plasma RANKL level. (A) RANKL levels, control vs. GD. Statistical analysis using unpaired t-test and F test to compare variance demonstrated a significant difference between control (mean 20 ± 5.8, n = 15) and GD cohorts (mean 166 ± 67.9, n = 33). * p < 0.05. (B) RANKL concentrations in control subjects and GD with no bone complication (N, mean 117 ± 74), osteopenia (OSN, mean 362 ± 118), and osteoporosis (OSR, mean 49 ± 26). * p < 0.05 ANOVA test, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test control vs. OSN and control vs. OSR.
Figure 2. Plasma RANKL level. (A) RANKL levels, control vs. GD. Statistical analysis using unpaired t-test and F test to compare variance demonstrated a significant difference between control (mean 20 ± 5.8, n = 15) and GD cohorts (mean 166 ± 67.9, n = 33). * p < 0.05. (B) RANKL concentrations in control subjects and GD with no bone complication (N, mean 117 ± 74), osteopenia (OSN, mean 362 ± 118), and osteoporosis (OSR, mean 49 ± 26). * p < 0.05 ANOVA test, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test control vs. OSN and control vs. OSR.
Jcm 10 02217 g002
Jcm 10 02217 g003 550
Figure 3. Circulating RANK levels in patients with GD. (A) RANK levels, control vs. GD group (mean 0.30 ± 0.02, n = 30). (B) RANK concentrations in control (mean 0.32 ± 0.03, n = 10) and GD groups N, OSN, and OSR. Data are means ± SEM. Measurements are in ng/mL.
Figure 3. Circulating RANK levels in patients with GD. (A) RANK levels, control vs. GD group (mean 0.30 ± 0.02, n = 30). (B) RANK concentrations in control (mean 0.32 ± 0.03, n = 10) and GD groups N, OSN, and OSR. Data are means ± SEM. Measurements are in ng/mL.
Jcm 10 02217 g003
Jcm 10 02217 g004 550
Figure 4. Plasma OPG (osteoprotegerin) concentrations. (A) OPG level, control (mean 206 ± 17, n = 10) vs. GD (mean 307 ± 30, n = 33). * p < 0.05 unpaired t test and F test. (B) OPG concentrations in control subjects and GD with no bone complication (N), osteopenia (OSN), and osteoporosis (OSR).
Figure 4. Plasma OPG (osteoprotegerin) concentrations. (A) OPG level, control (mean 206 ± 17, n = 10) vs. GD (mean 307 ± 30, n = 33). * p < 0.05 unpaired t test and F test. (B) OPG concentrations in control subjects and GD with no bone complication (N), osteopenia (OSN), and osteoporosis (OSR).
Jcm 10 02217 g004
Jcm 10 02217 g005 550
Figure 5. RANKL/OPG ratio. (A) Comparing RANKL/OPG ratio in control (mean 0.10 ± 0.06, n = 10) vs. GD cohorts (mean 0.60 ± 0.17, n = 33). F test significant p < 0.05 (B) RANKL/OPG ratio in control group (mean 0.11 ± 0.08, n = 10); GD-N (mean 0.39 ± 0.17, n = 9); GD-OSN (mean 1.3 ± 0.46, n = 10); and GD-OSR (mean 0.27 ± 0.170, n = 14) groups. Data are means ± SEM. ANOVA test, Bartlett’s multiple-comparisons, and Kruskal–Wallis tests (* p < 0.05) showed significant differences between groups. Tukey’s multiple-comparison test demonstrated significant differences between control vs. OSN groups.
Figure 5. RANKL/OPG ratio. (A) Comparing RANKL/OPG ratio in control (mean 0.10 ± 0.06, n = 10) vs. GD cohorts (mean 0.60 ± 0.17, n = 33). F test significant p < 0.05 (B) RANKL/OPG ratio in control group (mean 0.11 ± 0.08, n = 10); GD-N (mean 0.39 ± 0.17, n = 9); GD-OSN (mean 1.3 ± 0.46, n = 10); and GD-OSR (mean 0.27 ± 0.170, n = 14) groups. Data are means ± SEM. ANOVA test, Bartlett’s multiple-comparisons, and Kruskal–Wallis tests (* p < 0.05) showed significant differences between groups. Tukey’s multiple-comparison test demonstrated significant differences between control vs. OSN groups.
Jcm 10 02217 g005
Jcm 10 02217 g006 550
Figure 6. TRAP5b, RANKL, and OPG correlation in GD. (A) The RANKL-OPG-RANK pathway activates bone resorption and osteoclast differentiation. Osteoblasts express RANKL and OPG. Preosteoclasts express RANK, which is activated by RANKL. OPG neutralizes RANKL. TRAP5b, expressed by osteoclasts, is a marker of osteoclast activity. (B–D) Scatterplot analysis of correlation of OPG and RANKL (B), TRAP5n and RANKL (C), and TRAP5b and OPG (D). P5, P6, P7, P8, and P10 represent patients treated with denosumab. Healthy control (black diamond). GD cohorts: N (green), OSN (blue), and OSR (red). The graphs are divided into quadrants and demonstrate: left bottom (range of healthy controls), left top (higher than healthy control only in the vertical axis), right bottom (higher than healthy control only in the horizontal axis), and right top (higher than healthy control in both the vertical and the horizontal axis).
Figure 6. TRAP5b, RANKL, and OPG correlation in GD. (A) The RANKL-OPG-RANK pathway activates bone resorption and osteoclast differentiation. Osteoblasts express RANKL and OPG. Preosteoclasts express RANK, which is activated by RANKL. OPG neutralizes RANKL. TRAP5b, expressed by osteoclasts, is a marker of osteoclast activity. (B–D) Scatterplot analysis of correlation of OPG and RANKL (B), TRAP5n and RANKL (C), and TRAP5b and OPG (D). P5, P6, P7, P8, and P10 represent patients treated with denosumab. Healthy control (black diamond). GD cohorts: N (green), OSN (blue), and OSR (red). The graphs are divided into quadrants and demonstrate: left bottom (range of healthy controls), left top (higher than healthy control only in the vertical axis), right bottom (higher than healthy control only in the horizontal axis), and right top (higher than healthy control in both the vertical and the horizontal axis).
Jcm 10 02217 g006
Jcm 10 02217 g007 550
Figure 7. TRAP5b, RANKL, OPG correlation with biomarkers: CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and chitotriosidase in all GD patients. Scatterplot analysis of correlation of TRAP5b and CCL18 (A), TRAP5b and lyso-Gb1 (B), TRAP5b and chitotriosidase (C), RANKL and CCL18 (D), RANKL and lyso-Gb1 (E), RANKL and chitotriosidase (F), OPG and CCL18 (G), OPG and lyso-Gb1 (H), and OPG and chitotriosidase (I). p-values: statistical comparison was determined via Pearson’s two tail linear regression correlation analysis.
Figure 7. TRAP5b, RANKL, OPG correlation with biomarkers: CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and chitotriosidase in all GD patients. Scatterplot analysis of correlation of TRAP5b and CCL18 (A), TRAP5b and lyso-Gb1 (B), TRAP5b and chitotriosidase (C), RANKL and CCL18 (D), RANKL and lyso-Gb1 (E), RANKL and chitotriosidase (F), OPG and CCL18 (G), OPG and lyso-Gb1 (H), and OPG and chitotriosidase (I). p-values: statistical comparison was determined via Pearson’s two tail linear regression correlation analysis.
Jcm 10 02217 g007
Table
Table 1. The clinical features of bone disease in GD (Gaucher disease) cohorts: no bone complications (N), osteopenia (OSN), and osteoporosis (OSR).
Table 1. The clinical features of bone disease in GD (Gaucher disease) cohorts: no bone complications (N), osteopenia (OSN), and osteoporosis (OSR).
NOSNOSR
T-score (average ± STDEV)0.03 ± 0.2−1.07 ± 0.2−2.96 ± 0.8
Z-score (average ± STDEV)−0.2−1.6−2.73 ± 0.4
Bone pain4/9 (44%)4/10 (40%)10/14 (71%)
Bone surgery0/9 (0%)1/10 (10%)6/14 (42%)
Pathologic fractures0/9 (0%)2/10 (20%)3/14 (21%)
Bone marrow infiltration7/9 (77%)7/10 (67%)8/14 (57%)
EM-flask deformity5/9 (55%)3/10 (30%)8/14 (57%)
Cystic changes0/9 (0%)0/10 (0%)1/14 (7%)
Osteonecrosis3/9 (33%)1/10 (10%)4/14 (28%)
Table
Table 2. TRAP5b, RANKL, OPG correlation with CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and chitotriosidase (CHITO) in N, OSN, and OSR cohorts. Statistical comparisons were determined via Pearson’s one tail linear correlation analysis. * Statistical analysis included GD patients with abnormal bone density (OSN and OSR), two OSR outliers were removed.
Table 2. TRAP5b, RANKL, OPG correlation with CCL18, lyso-Gb1, and chitotriosidase (CHITO) in N, OSN, and OSR cohorts. Statistical comparisons were determined via Pearson’s one tail linear correlation analysis. * Statistical analysis included GD patients with abnormal bone density (OSN and OSR), two OSR outliers were removed.
TRAP5bOPGRANKL
CCL18NNNN
OSNpositive correlation
(R = 0.7; p = 0.02)		NN
OSRpositive correlation
(R = 0.5, p = 0.03)		NN
CHITONNNN
OSNpositive correlation
(R = 0.8, p = 0.006)		negative correlation
(R = −0.6, p = 0.03)		N
OSRpositive correlation
(R = 0.2, p = 0.05)		OSN + OSR
(R = −0.4, p = 0.02 *)		N
Lyso-Gb1NNNN
OSNpositive correlation
(R = 0.7, p = 0.02)		negative correlation
(R = −0.6, p = 0.03)		N
OSRpositive correlation
(R = 0.6, p = 0.02)		NN
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ivanova, M.; Dao, J.; Noll, L.; Fikry, J.; Goker-Alpan, O. TRAP5b and RANKL/OPG Predict Bone Pathology in Patients with Gaucher Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102217

AMA Style

Ivanova M, Dao J, Noll L, Fikry J, Goker-Alpan O. TRAP5b and RANKL/OPG Predict Bone Pathology in Patients with Gaucher Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(10):2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ivanova, Margarita, Julia Dao, Lauren Noll, Jacqueline Fikry, and Ozlem Goker-Alpan. 2021. "TRAP5b and RANKL/OPG Predict Bone Pathology in Patients with Gaucher Disease" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 10: 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102217

APA Style

Ivanova, M., Dao, J., Noll, L., Fikry, J., & Goker-Alpan, O. (2021). TRAP5b and RANKL/OPG Predict Bone Pathology in Patients with Gaucher Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(10), 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop