Next Article in Journal
Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies in Healthy Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Next Article in Special Issue
Differences in Sleep Disorders between HIV-Infected Persons and Matched Controls with Sleep Problems: A Matched-Cohort Study Based on Laboratory and Survey Data
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Advanced HIV Disease on Quality of Life and Mortality in the Era of Combined Antiretroviral Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm10102092
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Relevance of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in HIV/HCV Coinfected and HCV Monoinfected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy

by
Daniele Lapa
1,†,
Paola Del Porto
2,†,
Claudia Minosse
1,
Gianpiero D’Offizi
3,
Andrea Antinori
4,
Maria Rosaria Capobianchi
1,
Ubaldo Visco-Comandini
3,
Fiona McPhee
5,
Anna Rosa Garbuglia
1,* and
Mauro Zaccarelli
4
1
Laboratory of Virology, “Lazzaro Spallanzani” National Institute for Infectious Diseases, IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Biology and Biotechnology “C. Darwin”, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Hepatology and Infectious Diseases Unit, “Lazzaro Spallanzani” National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
4
Clinical Department, “Lazzaro Spallanzani ” National Institute for Infectious Diseases, IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
5
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Both authors have contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(10), 2092; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102092
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Revised: 2 May 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Epidemiology of HIV and Hepatitis Virus Co-infected Patients)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Torque Teno virus (TTV) is a ubiquitous virus that causes chronic infection in humans with unknown clinical consequences. Here, we investigated the influence of TTV infection on HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) efficacy in HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients as controls. Of 92 study patients, 79.3% were TTV DNA positive; untreated patients exhibited a significantly higher proportion of TTV DNA-positivity vs. sustained virological response (SVR) patients (100.0% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.001), while TTV positivity was not significant in DAA failure patients vs. SVR patients despite HIV/HCV coinfection. TTV DNA viral load was higher among HCV monoinfected patients vs. HIV/HCV coinfected, although marginally significant (p = 0.074) and no significant viral load difference was detected between DAA failures and SVR patients, while untreated vs. SVR patients had a significantly higher viral load (19,884, IQR 5977–333,534, vs. 469, IQR 10–4124, p = 0.004). Alpha-genogroup 3 TTV was the most prevalent genetic group, and no specific strain or genogroup was observed in relapser patients. Among HIV/HCV patients with HCV RNA detectable at end of treatment (EOT), TTV DNA was detected in 9/17 treatment responder patients and 3/5 relapser patients, thus, TTV infection does not appear to influence the control HCV viremia after EOT. Levels of IL-6 IL-4, and CD14 were not significantly different between TTV PCR-positive and -negative patients. These results suggest no association between TTV DNA positivity or viral load and HCV DAA failure whether patients were HIV/HCV coinfected or HCV monoinfected.

1. Introduction

Torque Teno virus (TTV) was first identified in a Japanese patient who died from fulminant hepatitis with unknown etiology [1]. TTVs are ubiquitous, genetically heterogeneous, non-enveloped, single-stranded, negative-sense circular DNA viruses with a 3.8 Kb genome. The genome includes 3 coding regions (ORF1, ORF2, ORF3) and a well-conserved untranslated region (UTR) divided into UTRA and UTRB located in 5′ and 3′ GC-rich regions, respectively [2]. TTV belongs to the alphatorquevirus genus, which is part of the Anelloviridae family of viruses. Other anellovirus genera that infect humans include the betatorquevirus, Torque Teno Mini virus (TTMV), and the gammatorquevirus, Torque Teno Midi virus (TTDV). To date, 76 species associated with the three noted genera have been identified [3]. Classification into genera is largely based on species-specificity and genome size. TTV belongs to the alphatorquetenovirus genus, which includes 39 genotypes [4,5]. Fourteen genotypes are significant components of the human virome [6]. Phylogenetically, seven genogroups (alpha-genogroups) have been identified [5].
The clinical consequences of TTV infection remain unknown [2,7,8]. TTV infection is chronic in most cases; however, our understanding of the pathogenicity of long-term infections with one or several TTV isolates is minimal. The large circulation within the general population suggests that TTV does not represent a principal etiological agent of a specific disease, but it could be a co-factor favoring the development of a pathologic status. For example, co-infection of human papillomavirus (HPV) with TTV genotype 1 has been associated with poor prognosis in laryngeal cancer, even though it is unknown whether and how TTV can be involved in cancer development [9]. TTV DNA was detected in lymphocytes and lymphomas from patients with B-cell and Hodgkin’s lymphoma [10]. The recent development of viral metagenomic approaches has allowed for better characterization of the genetic diversity of Anelloviridae. Indeed, metagenomics facilitated the identification of new Anelloviridae genotypes in patients suffering from various diseases, including Kawasaki disease, brain cancer, encephalitis, and periodontitis [11,12,13]. The blood is considered the main route of transmission [14,15,16,17,18].
It has been detected in blood, serum, and breast milk, although this virus shows tropism towards specific cells such as hepatocytes. Okamoto et al. reported that TTV titers were 10–100 fold higher in liver tissue than in serum from patients with transfusion-acquired hepatitis of unknown etiology [19], Asim et al. observed that viral burden in the liver tissue was three times higher than that observed in plasma [20]. Even though TTV has been associated with fulminant non-A, non-G hepatitis, its role in chronic hepatitis is questionable. Reports from several studies suggested no relationship between TTV positivity and liver damage in blood donors [21] or ALT elevation in patients with chronic viral hepatitis [22,23]. TTV is also able to replicate in the bone marrow and mononuclear cells, including T lymphocytes [24,25]. It can interact with innate immune cells by stimulating Toll-like receptor 9 and by inhibiting the NF-kB pathway [26]. TTV viral load is dramatically higher in transplant patients or those with sepsis, although the contribution of the virus to morbidity is unknown. More likely, TTV could associate with other viruses like Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) to induce a pathologic status. In HIV-positive patients, TTV DNA titer has been inversely correlated with CD4 T cell counts [27] and an increase in TTV DNA load was observed in patients who progress to AIDS [28].
However, other authors could not establish any correlation between TTV DNA positivity and CD4, CD8 T cell counts or HIV viral load in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients [29,30,31]. In mononuclear infected cells, TTV induces the production of interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-α and increases the concentration of interleukins such as IL-12, IL-28, IL-29, or chemokines (CCL7) [32]. Reduced survival of CD4 T cells has been observed in patients with high TTV DNA viral load [33], although TTV effects on adaptive immunity have not yet been established. Potential effects of TTV infection in HIV/HCV coinfected patients treated with HCV direct acting antivirals therapy (DAA) has not been explored. The introduction of HCV DAA therapies for treating HIV/HCV coinfected patients has produced SVR rates close to 100% [34]. When preexisting drug-resistant substitutions are not a factor, virologic failures to DAA therapy in this group of patients are still a matter of debate. Several factors have been considered as relevant for the success of DAA therapy, including immune reconstitution status, drug user addiction, and the extent of liver damage [35,36,37].
Our study aimed to investigate whether the presence of TTV positivity may influence sustained virological response (SVR) in HIV/HCV coinfected or HCV monoinfected patients treated with DAA therapy. In addition, we evaluated the association between TTV infection and the levels of immune and inflammatory markers in sera from DAA-treated patients analyzed by treatment outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Population and Sample Collection

This retrospective study was performed at the Laboratory of Virology of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases INMI L Spallanzani.
Overall, 92 HCV-infected patients were tested for TTV DNA by PCR and included in the analysis. To reduce selection bias, the following patients were included: (i) HCV patients treated with DAA in our Institute facilities between 2016 and 2019 and, subsequently, failed treatment (relapser); (ii) patients treated with DAA between 2016 and 2018 and achieved an SVR and returned to our Institute outpatient clinic in 2018 for a follow-up visit; and (iii) untreated HCV patients who also attended our Institute outpatient clinic for a medical check-up to assess their clinical status for starting DAA therapy. All patients completed informed consent forms for the study. This study was conducted following Good Clinical practice guidelines and was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee of INMI L Spallanzani IRCCS Hospital (protocol code 55/08).

2.1.1. HCV RNA Detection

HCV RNA viral load was quantified by a commercial real-time RT-PCR assay (RealTime™ HCV, Abbott Molecular Inc, Des Plaines, IL, USA) as specified by the manufacturer. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 12 IU/mL. HCV genotypes were assigned using the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II Assay (Abbott Molecular Inc, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Samples with an HCV RNA reading of “detected < 12 IU/mL”, were confirmed with an ultrasensitive method as previously described [38]. HCV RNA levels were measured at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), 4, 12, and 18 weeks after completion of treatment.
Residual plasma samples were collected and stored at −80 °C and used for TTV DNA detection and cytokine level determination.

2.1.2. Real-Time Quantitation of TTV DNA Load

Viral DNA was extracted from 400 μL of plasma samples using the QIASYMPHONY instrument (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Nucleic acids were eluted in 60 μL of AVE elution buffer (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
TTV DNA viral load quantification was achieved by employing the real-time TTV R-GENE assay targeting a highly conserved segment of the untranslated region (UTR) of the viral genome and using the Rotorgene Q instruments (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions (BioMérieux, France) [39]. The assay limit of detection is 167 copies/mL and the linearity range is 1.61–10.61 Log copies/mL [39]. This assay can detect and quantify a broad range of human alpha-torquetenovirus genotypes (TTV genotypes 1/3/6–8/10/12/15/16/19/27/28) [39,40] belonging to genogroups 1–5. All DAA-treated patients had their serum tested at EOT.

2.2. TTV DNA Amplification and Phylogenetic Analysis

Eluted nucleic acids (10 μL) were used for TTV-DNA detection by semi-nested PCR using primers designed against the untranslated genome B (UTRB) region, as previously described [41]. Primers were designed using the TTV TA278 isolate genome fragment spanning nucleotides 3362–3739 (Genbank accession number AB008394). For first-round PCR, the sense primer NG148 5′-CGAAAGTGAGTGGGGCCAGACTTC-3′ and antisense primer NG065 5′-GCCGACGGTTTTTTGGCGCCTTTTTTC-3′ were used under the following PCR conditions: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 45 s, extension at 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 45 s. Second-round PCR was performed using the same PCR conditions with an internal sense primer NG149 5′-CCATAAGGCCTTTATCTTGCC-3′ and the antisense primer NG065. TaqGold polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was employed for both rounds of amplification. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing (3500XL Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Forward and reverse strand electropherogram results were edited and assembled using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor software version 7.1.9 (Available online: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/B (accessed on 16 December 2020) [42].DNA sequences were checked against the GenBank nucleotide database and were confirmed to be TTV using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI, National Institute of Health, USA). INMI sequences were aligned with UTR sequences of alpha-genogroups 1–5 retrieved from GenBank. Sequence similarity was assessed using CLUSTALW [43]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method and the MEGA software package v.10 (Available online: http://www.megasoftware.net, accessed on 10 December 2020) [44]. The topological robustness of the tree was evaluated using a bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates.
Genogroups 6 and 7 were not included in the phylogenetic analysis because the UTR of these genogroups was not available in GenBank (see Figure 1). AB290917, a sequence belonging to gammatorquevirus, was considered as the representative for this group. Genogroups for the INMI sequences were estimated from the Fig tree based on the clustering with reference TTV sequences.
All samples (n = 23) identified as being TTV DNA negative by the Biomérieux kit were also shown to be TTV DNA negative when retested using our in-house developed UTR B PCR assay.

2.3. Quantification of Cytokines in Sera

Patient-derived sera were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for IFN-γ, CD14, IL4, and IL6 (R&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, diluted serum samples and standards were added to plate wells in duplicate and incubated at room temperature. Biotin-conjugated detection antibody was added at room temperature. Biotin-conjugated detection antibody was added followed by avidin-conjugated horseradish-peroxidase. The incubation time varied for each cytokine (see manufacturer’s instructions). Plates were developed using tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate and the reaction was quenched by adding a stop solution. Colorimetric changes of the enzyme substrate were detected at 450 nm wavelength using a microplate reader. Assay limits detection were: 8 pg/mL for INF-γ, 125 pg/mL for CD14, 0.11 pg/mL for IL4, and 0.031 pg/mL for IL6.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (v. 25.0) statistical software (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY, USA). The association with TTV PCR detection and TTV viral load (copies/mL) with patient demographics, clinical and laboratory variables related to HIV and HCV infection were assessed using the Fisher exact test and ANOVA test, respectively. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to compare patients with continuous variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables (age and CD4 T cell count) were categorized to evaluate any association with TTV PCR positivity and viral load (TTV PCR test) and included in the database.
Age was selected at the cut-off that showed the highest difference with TTV positivity (55 years); for CD4 T cell count, the standard cut-offs used to monitor HIV infection were evaluated (e.g., 200, 350, and 500). Since the CD4 T cell count was generally high in these patients, the 500 count cut-off was also included as a variable parameter.
Patients were classified in subgroups according to HIV sero-status, HCV DAA treatment status, and treatment outcome at EOT and post-therapy.
Group A included HIV/HCV patients treated with HCV DAA and had HCV RNA <12 IU/mL at EOT; 5/22 (27.3%) relapsed after treatment. Group B included HIV/HCV coinfected patients treated with DAA, and had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT, and achieved SVR. Group C included HIV/HCV coinfected patients treated with DAA, who had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT and then relapsed. Group D included HCV monoinfected patients treated with DAA, and had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT, and achieved SVR. Group E included HCV monoinfected patients, who had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT before relapsing. A control group of 24 untreated HCV patients was split between those who were HIV/HCV coinfected (Group F1) and those who were HCV monoinfected (Group F2).
Finally, the association between cytokine values and TTV PCR positivity was also assessed comparing mean values (SD) and statistical significance between mean distribution with the ANOVA test, however, if non-homogeneity of variance was assumed (using Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance), a nonparametric test was used.

3. Results

3.1. Virological and Immunological Results

The clinical characteristics of patients included in the study, analyzed overall and by both HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected status, are described in Table 1. As shown, most (88.0%) were males with a median age of 44 years and over two-thirds were HIV/HCV coinfected patients currently receiving antiretroviral therapy. Regarding HCV status, 46 patients (50%) achieved SVR, 22 (23.9%) failed DAA therapy, and 24 (26.1%) never received HCV treatment. HCV genotype (GT)1a was the most predominant genotype (45.7%), and 30.4% of all patients had cirrhosis. Whether a patient was monoinfected with HCV or coinfected with HIV/HCV, the distribution of HCV GT and cirrhosis was similar.
TTV DNA PCR positivity was detected in 73 patients (79.3%), with a median TTV DNA viral load of 2362 copies/mL (IQ range 32,829). Among HIV-positive patients, the mean CD4 T cell count was 611, indicative of an acceptable immune status. Among DAA-treated patients, those with cirrhosis were more likely to fail treatment (44.0% vs. 25.6% in non-cirrhotic patients, p = 0.098), as well as those with HCV GT3 (54.5% vs. 29.1% in non-cirrhotic patients, GT3 p = 0.101).
The relationship between TTV DNA PCR positivity and TTV viral load and other variables of interest are reported in Table 2. The continuous variables (age, CD4 T cell count) were categorized at the best cut-point for association with TTV DNA PCR. The percentage of TTV DNA PCR positivity was significantly lower in HIV/HCV coinfected patients vs. HCV monoinfected patients. Patients with detectable HCV RNA (HCV untreated or DAA failure) showed a higher positivity to TTV DNA than DAA-treated patients achieving SVR. In particular, TTV DNA positivity was significantly higher in untreated vs. SVR patients (100.0% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.001), while numerically higher in DAA failures vs. SVR patients (86.4% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.06). No significant association was observed between TTV DNA PCR positivity and gender, cirrhosis, HCV-genotype, age, and CD4 T cell count. The TTV DNA viral load was significantly higher in HCV untreated patients vs. SVR patients; however, no significant difference was detected between DAA failures and SVR patients. Finally, TTV DNA viral load was numerically higher among HCV monoinfected patients vs. HIV/HCV coinfected, although not significant (p = 0.074). The association of TTV PCR positivity and copies/mL with subgroups A-F1/F2 is reported in Table 3. As shown, HCV monoinfected DAA relapsers (Group E, n = 11), untreated HCV monoinfected (Group F2, n = 11), and HIV/HCV coinfected (Group F1, n = 13) patients were all TTV DNA PCR positive. No significant differences were found when comparing HIV/HCV coinfected subgroups (A, n = 22; B, n = 22; C, n = 6). Moreover, no overall significant differences were observed when comparing TTV DNA PCR levels within subgroups, although HCV monoinfected always exhibited higher TTV PCR levels vs. HIV/HCV coinfected patients irrespective of whether patients: (i) achieved an SVR, (ii) failed DAA therapy, or (iii) were DAA treatment-naive.
We next evaluated for TTV DNA PCR positivity association with serum inflammatory (CD14 and IL-6) and immune markers (IFN-g and IL-4). Levels of the monocyte/macrophage activation marker, CD14, and the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-6, were not significantly different between TTV DNA PCR positive and negative patients. Similarly, no difference in mean IL-4 values was observed between the two groups of patients (Table 4). The levels of IFN-ɣ were below the assay detection limit in all analyzed patients.
For completeness, the levels of serum IL-6, IL-4, and CD14 were analyzed by the patient subgroup. For Group C (HIV/HCV DAA relapsers), only IL-6 was evaluated due to limitations in available serum. As reported in Table 5, the levels of IL-6 and CD14 were not significantly different among the patient groups analyzed. Statistically significant associations among groups were found with IL-4 distribution, which ranged between the lowest values for Group B (p = 0.011 vs. other groups) to the highest values for Group A (p < 0.014 vs. other groups).
Finally, we verified whether TTV DNA positivity could somehow influence the viral rebound in patients with HCV RNA <12 IU/mL at end-of-treatment (EOT; Group A). For the five relapser patients included in Group A, three were TTV DNA positive. In addition, TTV DNA was also present in 9/17 patients who achieved SVR, suggesting that TTV infection is not relevant in the control of HCV viremia after EOT in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The UTRB region was successfully amplified in 43 of 73 TTV DNA positive samples detected by the Biomérieux assay. Multiple TTV isolates were detected in 10 samples, probably due to co-infections, complicated sequence identification, thus, phylogenetic analysis was performed using 33 sequences. References for TTV alpha-genogroup 1 (genogroup1) to 5 were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Supplemental Materials Tables S1 and S2). A phylogenetic tree was constructed employing the maximum-likelihood method (Figure 1). TTV alpha-genogroups included genogroup3 (n = 13), genogroup1 (n = 2), and undetermined genogroup strains (n = 18). Genogroup1 strains were observed only in untreated patients: one in the F1 group and the other in the F2 group, while genogroup3 isolates were found in all groups. The genogroup3 strains were grouped into three different clades. Both strains from coinfected patients and those from monoinfected patients were found in all three clades. In clade A, sequences shared a similarity of 81.1%, in clade B, 79.6%, and in clade C, 90.8%. PtINMI_CUOW had a 75.3% similarity with AY823988, an alpha-genogroup3 reference sequence.
Six undetermined strains clustered in the same clade. They showed a similarity of 81.5% with the genotype2 reference sequence AJ20213. INMI_PtNACL had a similarity of 85% with the other six strains and 83.2% identity with AJ62013. INMI_PtRIZR belonged to genogroup1 with a similarity of 95.3% with a USA reference strain, AF122920_Alpha1. The similarity of INMI_PtFUNM was 98.4% with LR742509 from Romania and 71.8% with AF122920_Alpha1. High similarity was observed with isolates from different geographical locations. In particular, INMI_PtAN131 and INMI_PtBIA exhibited 99.1% similarity with MK848842, a strain isolated from a patient with hepatitis in Malaysia, and 98.7% with KT163879, a strain isolated from an HIV patient from the USA.
Moreover, phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) demonstrated that the distribution of alpha-genogroups was not associated with HIV status.

4. Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the impact of TTV infection on SVR achievement both in HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients. Interestingly, TTV prevalence was lower in HIV/HCV coinfected patients in comparison to HCV monoinfected patients (63.0% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.029). This data may be explained by the fact that antiretroviral therapy has been associated with inhibition of TTV replication [31]. Indeed, Devalle et al. observed that after initiating HAART, TTV positivity and genogroup variability were less in HIV-positive patients. This finding is supported by the lower TTV viral load in HIV/HCV coinfected patients (44,004 ± 127,039 copies/mL) vs. HCV monoinfected patients (572,941 ± 2,328,908 copies/mL; p = 0.074). The high number of CD4 T cells may also explain the modest TTV viral load detected in HIV/HCV patients. It has been noted in several studies that restoration of the immune response may cause a reduction in TTV viral load/positivity detected in patient sera [27,48,49]. Overall, TTV infection was detected in 79.3% of patients, in agreement with previously reported data [14,41,50,51,52], and no correlation was observed between TTV positivity and achievement of SVR since TTV DNA prevalence was similar between HIV/HCV coinfected groups B and C and HCV monoinfected groups D and E (Table 3). Analysis of gender relationships with TTV was non-conclusive since the majority of patients were males (88%).
No significant differences between the infecting HCV genotype and TTV-PCR positivity or TTV viral load were observed. This suggests TTV infection was not associated with specific HCV genotypes.
Assessment of liver pathology indicated no significant associations between TTV DNA and cirrhosis or a specific HCV genotype. This agrees with Garcia-Alvarez [51] who found that there were no significant differences in TTV viral load between HIV/HCV coinfected patients with various stages of fibrosis.
The majority of patients in our study were infected with TTV genogroup 3 irrespective of HIV serostatus, consistent with previous reports [53,54].
All TTV strains with an undetermined genogroup exhibited high similarity with other TTV strains isolated from different geographical locations that included Malaysia and the USA, suggesting a ubiquitous distribution of these TTV strains (Figure 1). This underscores TTV heterogeneity and suggests that only full-genome sequencing will help assess whether indeterminate isolates are variants or new genotypes.
No patient in our study was infected with TTV genogroup 4. This agrees with Reference [52], where genogroup 4 was not detected in HBV and HCV positive patients.
Presently, the role of TTV infection in regulating host innate and adaptive immune responses is unclear. In vitro studies have demonstrated that different molecules from TTV can positively or negatively regulate the expression of key inflammatory mediators at the cellular level. Indeed, Rocchi et al. demonstrated that DNA representing TTV genogroup 4 TTV (ViPiSAL) activated the production of IL-6 and IFN-ү through the stimulation of TLR9 in murine spleen cells [55], while Zheng et al. reported that TTV ORF2 protein suppressed the activity of NF-kB by inhibiting its translocation to the cell nucleus and subsequent transcription of genes, such as IL-6, IL-8, and cyclo-oxygenase-2 [26].
The observed lack of a significant association between TTV DNA positivity and markers of inflammation (IL-6, CD14) or adaptive immune responses (IFN-ɣ, IL-4) in untreated or HCV DAA-treated HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients do not support a role for TTV in affecting innate or adaptive immune responses in vivo. However, it cannot be ruled out that the similar quantities of cytokines detected in sera from TTV-negative and -positive patients may be a consequence of the low immunostimulatory properties of infecting viral strains. In particular, none of our patients were infected with TTV genogroup 4, which, according to the CpG index, has been predicted to be the most immunostimulatory TTV genogroup among genogroups 1 through 5 [55].
Overall, our results demonstrated that HIV-positive patients had a TTV DNA viral load similar to those described in healthy donors [39,56], indicating both an immune reconstitution and effectiveness of antiviral therapy in inhibition of TTV replication. In our study, no TTV DNA viral load cut-off correlated with HCV DAA treatment failure, unlike the findings observed in transplanted patients, where a TTV viral load cut-off of 9.3 Log copies/mL was predictive for the development of infection [57,58], and a positive correlation was observed between TTV DNA viral load and doses of prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil.
There were a few limitations in the present study. The first was attributed to the single center study design and the power of subgroup analyses associated with a small sample size. Second, TTV DNA viral load evaluations were performed only on EOT samples from HCV DAA-treated patients since samples at additional visits were not available. Third, the heterogeneity in our tested patient population with respect to the infecting HCV genotype and DAA treatment may have introduced confounding variables. However, bias related to DAA treatment outcome was limited since all patients visiting our center during a defined period were asked about participating in our study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, an association between TTV viral load and HCV DAA failure was not observed in HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients, respectively. Additionally, TTV viral load and HCV DAA treatment success were independent of the infecting TTV genogroup harbored by patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10102092/s1, Table S1: TTV strains included in the phylogenetic analysis, Table S2: GenBank accession numbers of patients sequences described in Phylogenetic tree.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.R.G., M.Z., P.D.P.; writing—Original draft preparation: A.R.G., D.L., M.Z.; funding acquisition M.R.C., A.A.; formal analysis: M.Z., A.R.G., P.D.P.; investigation: C.M., D.L., G.D., U.V.-C.; methodology: A.R.G., D.L., C.M., P.D.P.; writing—Review and editing: P.D.P., M.Z., F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministero della Salute, grant Ricerca corrente.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of “Lazzaro Spallanzani” National Institute for Infectious Diseases (reference approval code 55/08, 29 October 2008).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors D.L., P.D.P., C.M., G.D., M.R.C., A.A., U.V.-C., A.R.G., and M.Z. declare no conflict of interest, F.M. is an advisory board member from Bristol-Myers Squibb. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nishizawa, T.; Okamoto, H.; Konishi, K.; Yoshizawa, H.; Miyakawa, Y.; Mayumi, M. A novel DNA virus (TTV) associated with elevated transaminase levels in posttransfusion hepatitis of unknown etiology. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 241, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Okamoto, H. History of discoveries and pathogenicity of TT viruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 331, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Webb, B.; Rakibuzzaman, A.; Ramamoorthy, S. Torque teno viruses in health and disease. Virus Res. 2020, 285, 198013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biagini, P. Classification of TTV and related viruses (anelloviruses). Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 331, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Hsiao, K.L.; Wang, L.Y.; Lin, C.L.; Liu, H.F. New Phylogenetic Groups of Torque Teno Virus Identified in Eastern Taiwan Indigenes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Vlaminck, I.; Khush, K.K.; Strehl, C.; Kohli, B.; Luikart, H.; Neff, N.F.; Okamoto, J.; Snyder, T.M.; Cornfield, D.N.; Nicolls, M.R.; et al. Temporal response of the human virome to immunosuppression and antiviral therapy. Cell 2013, 155, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Poovorawan, Y.; Tangkijvanich, P.; Theamboonlers, A.; Hirsch, P. Transfusion transmissible virus TTV and its putative role in the etiology of liver disease. Hepatogastroenterology 2001, 48, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Okamoto, H.; Takahashi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Ukita, M.; Fukuda, M.; Tsuda, F.; Miyakawa, Y.; Mayumi, M. Marked genomic heterogeneity and frequent mixed infection of TT virus demonstrated by PCR with primers from coding and noncoding regions. Virology 1999, 259, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Szládek, G.; Juhász, A.; Kardos, G.; Szoke, K.; Major, T.; Sziklai, I.; Tar, I.; Márton, I.; Kónya, J.; Gergely, L.; et al. High co-prevalence of genogroup 1 TT virus and human papillomavirus is associated with poor clinical outcome of laryngeal carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005, 58, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Garbuglia, A.R.; Iezzi, T.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Pignoloni, P.; Pulsoni, A.; Sourdis, J.; Pescarmona, E.; Vitolo, D.; Mandelli, F. Detection of TT virus in lymph node biopsies of B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease, and its association with EBV infection. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2003, 16, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Li, F.; Shan, T.L.; Deng, X.; Delwart, E.; Feng, X.P. A novel species of torque teno mini virus (TTMV) in gingival tissue from chronic periodontitis patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ng, T.F.F.; Dill, J.A.; Camus, A.C.; Delwart, E.; Van Meir, E.G. Two new species of betatorqueviruses identified in a human melanoma that metastasized to the brain. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 105800–105808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bal, A.; Oriol, G.; Josset, L.; Generenaz, L.; Sarkozy, C.; Sesques, P.; Salles, G.; Morfin, F.; Lina, B.; Becker, J.; et al. Metagenomic Investigation of Torque Teno Mini Virus-SH in Hematological Patients. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spandole-Dinu, S.; Cimponeriu, D.G.; Crăciun, A.M.; Radu, I.; Nica, S.; Toma, M.; Alexiu, O.A.; Iorga, C.S.; Berca, L.M.; Nica, R. Prevalence of human anelloviruses in Romanian healthy subjects and patients with common pathologies. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rivanera, D.; Lozzi, M.A.; Idili, C.; Lilli, D. Prevalence of TT virus infection in Italian dialysis patients. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 2009, 57, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Irshad, M.; Mandal, K.; Singh, S.; Agarwal, S.K. Torque teno virus infection in hemodialysis patients in North India. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2010, 42, 1077–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Massaú, A.; Martins, C.; Nachtigal, G.C.; Araújo, A.B.; Rossetti, M.L.; Niel, C.; da Silva, C.M. The high prevalence of Torque teno virus DNA in blood donors and haemodialysis patients in southern Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2012, 107, 684–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ataei, B.; Emami Naeini, A.; Khorvash, F.; Yazdani, M.R.; Javadi, A.A. Prevalence of transfusion transmitted virus infection in hemodialysis patients and injection drug users compared to healthy blood donors in isfahan, iran. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 671927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Okamoto, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Kato, N.; Ukita, M.; Ikeda, K.; Iizuka, H.; Miyakawa, Y.; Mayumi, M. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel DNA virus (TTV) associated with posttransfusion hepatitis of unknow etiology. Hepatol. Res. 1998, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Asim, M.; Singla, R.; Gupta, R.K.; Kar, P. Clinical & molecular characterization of human TT virus in different liver diseases. Indian J. Med. Res. 2010, 131, 545–554. [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsumoto, A.; Yeo, A.E.; Shih, J.W.; Tanaka, E.; Kiyosawa, K.; Alter, H.J. Transfusion-associated TT virus infection and its relationship to liver disease. Hepatology 1999, 30, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kato, H.; Mizokami, M.; Orito, E.; Ohno, T.; Hayashi, K.; Nakano, T.; Kato, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Sugauchi, F.; Mukaide, M.; et al. Lack of association between TTV viral load and aminotransferase levels in patients with hepatitis C or non-B-C. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 32, 259–262. [Google Scholar]
  23. Irshad, M.; Sharma, Y.; Dhar, I.; Singh, J.; Joshi, Y.K. Transfusion-transmitted virus in association with hepatitis A-E viral infections in various forms of liver diseases in India. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 2432–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Focosi, D.; Antonelli, G.; Pistello, M.; Maggi, F. Torquetenovirus: The human virome from bench to bedside. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Maggi, F.; Focosi, D.; Albani, M.; Lanini, L.; Vatteroni, M.L.; Petrini, M.; Ceccherini-Nelli, L.; Pistello, M.; Bendinelli, M. Role of hematopoietic cells in the maintenance of chronic human torquetenovirus plasma viremia. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 6891–6893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zheng, H.; Ye, L.; Fang, X.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, X.; Kong, L.; Wang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Ye, L.; et al. Torque teno virus (SANBAN isolate) ORF2 protein suppresses NF-kappaB pathways via interaction with IkappaB kinases. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 11917–11924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shibayama, T.; Masuda, G.; Ajisawa, A.; Takahashi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Tsuda, F.; Okamoto, H. Inverse relationship between the titre of TT virus DNA and the CD4 cell count in patients infected with HIV. Aids 2001, 15, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Thom, K.; Petrik, J. Progression towards AIDS leads to increased Torque teno virus and Torque teno minivirus titers in tissues of HIV infected individuals. J. Med. Virol. 2007, 79, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nasser, T.F.; Brajão de Oliveira, K.; Reiche, E.M.; Amarante, M.K.; Pelegrinelli Fungaro, M.H.; Watanabe, M.A. Detection of TT virus in HIV-1 exposed but uninfected individuals and in HIV-1 infected patients and its influence on CD4+ lymphocytes and viral load. Microb. Pathog. 2009, 47, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Elesinnla, A.R.; Adeleye, I.A.; Ayolabi, C.I.; Bessong, P.O. Prevalence of torque viruses in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected Nigerian subjects: Analysis of near-full-length genome sequences. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Devalle, S.; Rua, F.; Morgado, M.G.; Niel, C. Variations in the frequencies of torque teno virus subpopulations during HAART treatment in HIV-1-coinfected patients. Arch. Virol. 2009, 154, 1285–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reshetnyak, V.I.; Maev, I.V.; Burmistrov, A.I.; Chekmazov, I.A.; Karlovich, T.I. Torque teno virus in liver diseases: On the way towards unity of view. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 1691–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zur Hausen, H.; de Villiers, E.M. TT viruses: Oncogenic or tumor-suppressive properties? Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 331, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wyles, D.L.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Dieterich, D. Management of Hepatitis C/HIV Coinfection in the Era of Highly Effective Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63 (Suppl. 1), S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pereira, G.L.; Tarragô, A.M.; Neves, W.L.L.; da Silva Neto, P.V.; de Souza, P.S.; Dos Santos Affonso, J.; de Sousa, K.S.; da Silva, J.A.; Costa, A.G.; da Silva Victoria, F.; et al. Immunological Dynamics Associated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapies in Naive and Experimented HCV Chronic-Infected Patients. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 4738237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pericot-Valverde, I.; Heo, M.; Akiyama, M.J.; Norton, B.L.; Agyemang, L.; Niu, J.; Litwin, A.H. Factors and HCV treatment outcomes associated with smoking among people who inject drugs on opioid agonist treatment: Secondary analysis of the PREVAIL randomized clinical trial. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Werner, C.R.; Schwarz, J.M.; Egetemeyr, D.P.; Beck, R.; Malek, N.P.; Lauer, U.M.; Berg, C.P. Second-generation direct-acting-antiviral hepatitis C virus treatment: Efficacy, safety, and predictors of SVR12. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 8050–8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Visco-Comandini, U.; Lapa, D.; Lionetti, R.; Taibi, C.; Loiacono, L.; Montalbano, M.; Capobianchi, M.R.; D’Offizi, G.; Garbuglia, A.R. Significance of detectable HCV RNA below the limit of quantification in patients treated with DAAs using standard and ultrasensitive protocols. J. Med. Virol. 2018, 90, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kulifaj, D.; Durgueil-Lariviere, B.; Meynier, F.; Munteanu, E.; Pichon, N.; Dubé, M.; Joannes, M.; Essig, M.; Hantz, S.; Barranger, C.; et al. Development of a standardized real time PCR for Torque teno viruses (TTV) viral load detection and quantification: A new tool for immune monitoring. J. Clin. Virol. 2018, 105, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kulifaj, D.; Tilloy, V.; Scaon, E.; Guerin, E.; Essig, M.; Pichon, N.; Hantz, S.; De Bernardi, A.; Joannes, M.; Barranger, C.; et al. Viral metagenomics analysis of kidney donors and recipients: Torque teno virus genotyping and prevalence. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 3301–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cancela, F.; Ramos, N.; Mirazo, S.; Mainardi, V.; Gerona, S.; Arbiza, J. Detection and molecular characterization of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in Uruguay. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 44, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT; Nucleic Acids Symposium Series; Information Retrieval Ltd.: London, UK, 1999; Volume 41, pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hallett, R.L.; Clewley, J.P.; Bobet, F.; McKiernan, P.J.; Teo, C.G. Characterization of a highly divergent TT virus genome. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81 Pt 9, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Muljono, D.H.; Nishizawa, T.; Tsuda, F.; Takahashi, M.; Okamoto, H. Molecular epidemiology of TT virus (TTV) and characterization of two novel TTV genotypes in Indonesia. Arch. Virol. 2001, 146, 1249–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. ICTV Report. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_9th_report/ssdna-viruses-2011/w/ssdna_viruses/139/anelloviridae (accessed on 18 December 2020).
  48. Christensen, J.K.; Eugen-Olsen, J.; SŁrensen, M.; Ullum, H.; Gjedde, S.B.; Pedersen, B.K.; Nielsen, J.O.; Krogsgaard, K. Prevalence and prognostic significance of infection with TT virus in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 1796–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Madsen, C.D.; Eugen-Olsen, J.; Kirk, O.; Parner, J.; Kaae Christensen, J.; Brasholt, M.S.; Ole Nielsen, J.; Krogsgaard, K. TTV viral load as a marker for immune reconstitution after initiation of HAART in HIV-infected patients. HIV Clin. Trials 2002, 3, 287–295. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nishizawa, Y.; Tanaka, E.; Orii, K.; Rokuhara, A.; Ichijo, T.; Yoshizawa, K.; Kiyosawa, K. Clinical impact of genotype 1 TT virus infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C and response of TT virus to alpha-interferon. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2000, 15, 1292–1297. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. García-Álvarez, M.; Berenguer, J.; Alvarez, E.; Guzmán-Fulgencio, M.; Cosín, J.; Miralles, P.; Catalán, P.; López, J.C.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Micheloud, D.; et al. Association of torque teno virus (TTV) and torque teno mini virus (TTMV) with liver disease among patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 32, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. AbuOdeh, R.; Al-Mawlawi, N.; Al-Qahtani, A.A.; Bohol, M.F.; Al-Ahdal, M.N.; Hasan, H.A.; AbuOdeh, L.; Nasrallah, G.K. Detection and genotyping of torque teno virus (TTV) in healthy blood donors and patients infected with HBV or HCV in Qatar. J. Med. Virol. 2015, 87, 1184–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Maggi, F.; Andreoli, E.; Lanini, L.; Fornai, C.; Vatteroni, M.; Pistello, M.; Presciuttini, S.; Bendinelli, M. Relationships between total plasma load of torquetenovirus (TTV) and TTV genogroups carried. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4807–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Li, L.; Deng, X.; Da Costa, A.C.; Bruhn, R.; Deeks, S.G.; Delwart, E. Virome analysis of antiretroviral-treated HIV patients shows no correlation between T-cell activation and anelloviruses levels. J. Clin. Virol. 2015, 72, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rocchi, J.; Ricci, V.; Albani, M.; Lanini, L.; Andreoli, E.; Macera, L.; Pistello, M.; Ceccherini-Nelli, L.; Bendinelli, M.; Maggi, F. Torquetenovirus DNA drives proinflammatory cytokines production and secretion by immune cells via toll-like receptor 9. Virology 2009, 394, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Simonetta, F.; Pradier, A.; Masouridi-Levrat, S.; van Delden, C.; Giostra, E.; Morard, I.; Mueller, N.; Muellhaupt, B.; Valli, P.V.; Semmo, N.; et al. Torque Teno Virus Load and Acute Rejection After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2017, 101, e219–e221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Görzer, I.; Jaksch, P.; Kundi, M.; Seitz, T.; Klepetko, W.; Puchhammer-Stöckl, E. Pre-transplant plasma Torque Teno virus load and increase dynamics after lung transplantation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Strassl, R.; Doberer, K.; Rasoul-Rockenschaub, S.; Herkner, H.; Görzer, I.; Kläger, J.P.; Schmidt, R.; Haslacher, H.; Schiemann, M.; Eskandary, F.A.; et al. Torque Teno Virus for Risk Stratification of Acute Biopsy-Proven Alloreactivity in Kidney Transplant Recipients. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 219, 1934–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 10 02092 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of TTV UTR B (3′UTR) region from patient-derived samples. Thirty-three patient-derived nucleotide sequences and representative TTV genogroup sequences, chosen following the original publications [8,14,41,45,46] and ICVT [47] were used for the construction of a Maximum-likelihood method tree that was visualized with Fig Tree (Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 22 December 2020)). Bootstrap values > 80% are indicated on respective branches. Scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site. TTV Italian strains were indicated as INMI. Patients included in group A are in red, in group B in violet, group D in orange, group E in pink, group F1 in blue, and group F2 in green. Reference sequences are indicated by their GenBank accession number, genogroup, and name of the isolate if available.The list of all GenBank accession numbers is reported in Supplemental Materials Tables S1 and S2.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of TTV UTR B (3′UTR) region from patient-derived samples. Thirty-three patient-derived nucleotide sequences and representative TTV genogroup sequences, chosen following the original publications [8,14,41,45,46] and ICVT [47] were used for the construction of a Maximum-likelihood method tree that was visualized with Fig Tree (Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 22 December 2020)). Bootstrap values > 80% are indicated on respective branches. Scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site. TTV Italian strains were indicated as INMI. Patients included in group A are in red, in group B in violet, group D in orange, group E in pink, group F1 in blue, and group F2 in green. Reference sequences are indicated by their GenBank accession number, genogroup, and name of the isolate if available.The list of all GenBank accession numbers is reported in Supplemental Materials Tables S1 and S2.
Jcm 10 02092 g001
Table
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
All Patients
n (%)		HCV Mono-Infected
n (%)		HIV/HCV Coinfected
n (%)
Overall92 (100.0%)29 (31.5%)63 (68.5%)
Gender
Male81 (88.0%)21 (72.4%)60 (95.2%)
Female11 (19%)8 (27.6%)3 (4.8%)
TTV DNA-PCR positive73 (79.3%)27 (93.1%)46 (73%)
HCV treatment response
SVR46 (50.0%)7 (24.1%)39 (61.9%)
Untreated24 (26.1%)11 (37.9%)13 (20.6%)
DAA failure22 (23.9%)11 (37.9%)11 (17.5%)
Cirrhosis28 (30.4%)10 (34.5%)18 (28.6%)
HCV genotype
1a42 (45.7%)9 (31.0%)33 (52.4%)
1b15 (16.3%)7 (24.1%)8 (12.7%)
29 (5.4%)3 (10.3%)2 (3.2%)
313 (14.1%)6 (20.7%)7 (11.1%)
43 (3.3%)3 (10.3%)11 (17.5%)
Other/unknown3 (3.3%)1 (3.4%)2 (3.2%)
Age (median, IQ-range)53 (49–56)53 (48–59)53 (49–56)
TTV DNA, copies/mL (median, IQ range)2259 (50–31,446)29,715 (6578–55,841)778 (13–5777)
CD4 T cell count * (median, IQ range) 611 (359–950)
* CD4 T cell count in 59 HIV/HCV positive patients; n, number.
Table
Table 2. Univariable association of TTV DNA positivity and copies/mL with viral markers.
Table 2. Univariable association of TTV DNA positivity and copies/mL with viral markers.
TTV DNA PCR Pos (%)p-Value *TTV DNA PCR cp/mL,
Median (IQ Range)		p-Value *
Gender
Male63/81 (77.8%) 1351 (39–31,071)
Female10/11 (90.9%)0.44931,446 (10,067–396,782)0.894
HIV
HIV/HCV coinfected46/63 (63.0%) 881 (15–5818)
HCV monoinfected27/29 (93.1%)0.02931,446 (6857–114,056)0.232 **
HCV status
SVR30 /46 (65.2%) 469 (10–4124)
Untreated24/24 (100.0%)<0.001 ***19,884 (5977–333,534)0.04 **** (**)
DAA failure19/22 (86.4%)0.06 ***4915 (450–64,535)
Cirrhosis
Yes23/28 (82.1%) 6934 (558–80,913)
No50/64 (78.1%)0.7841419 (42–28,914)0.523
HCV genotype
1a34/42 (45.7%) 4227 (155–30,609)
1b13/15 (86.7%) 8079 (575–55,841)
23/5 (60.0%) 50 (10–264,129)
311/13 (84.6%) 2259 (32–249,452)
49/14 (64.3%) 248 (10–17,882)
Other/unknown3/3 (100.0%)0.72710,067 (1079–10,067)0.366 (1a vs. oth) **
Age
≥5529/33 (87.9%) 6935 (566–28,114)
<5544/59 (60.3%)0.1811514 (18–36,679)0.216 **
CD4 T cell count
<50016/19 (84.2%) 469 (10–5337)
≥50026/40 (65.0%)0.2181232 (159–11,399)0.311
cp, copies; pos, positive; oth, other; * p-value calculated using the Fisher exact test or the ANOVA test, ** if non-homogeneity of variance was assumed by the Levene’s test, a nonparametric test was used, *** p < 0.001 for untreated vs. SVR patients, p = 0.06 for DAA failure vs. SVR patients, **** p = 0.04 for HCV untreated vs. responders.
Table
Table 3. Association of TTV DNA positivity and copies/mL with subgroups of patients.
Table 3. Association of TTV DNA positivity and copies/mL with subgroups of patients.
TTV DNA PCR Positive n. /Total (%)TTV DNA PCR Copies/mLMedian (IQ Range)
Group A12/22 (54.5%)95 (10–2204)
Group B16/22 (72.7%)830 (126–2590)
Group C5/6 (83.3%)348 (33–4677)
Group D5/7 (71.4%)10,067 (10–29,715)
Group E11/11 (100.0%)52,781 (8050–137,494)
Group F113/13 (100.0%)12,999 (2581–305,659)
Group F211/11 (100.0%)31,446 (7136–396,782)
Cp, copies; p = 0.002 at chi-square for trend. Group A, HIV/HCV coinfected patients with detectable HCV RNA at end of treatment (EOT); Group B, HIV/HCV coinfected patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR); Group C, HIV/HCV coinfected DAA relapsers; Group D, HCV monoinfected patients who achieved SVR; Group E, HCV monoinfected DAA relapsers; Group F1, untreated HIV/HCV coinfected patients; Group F2, untreated HCV monoinfected patients.
Table
Table 4. Association of cytokines with TTV DNA positivity.
Table 4. Association of cytokines with TTV DNA positivity.
TTV DNA PCR Pos
Median (IQ Range)		TTV DNA PCR Neg
Median (IQ Range)		p-Value *
IL-62.87 (1.70–4.56)2.07 (1.82–5.77)0.810
IL-40.00 (0.00–0.29)0.56 (0.00–1.96)0.200
CD148577 (6822–10,273)9589 (7573–10,842)0.615
pos, positive; neg, negative; * p-value calculated using the ANOVA test since equal variance was assumed by Levene’s test for equality of variance.
Table
Table 5. Association of cytokines with patient subgroups.
Table 5. Association of cytokines with patient subgroups.
IL-6
Median (IQ Range)		IL-4 *
Median (IQ Range)		CD14
Median (IQ Range)
Group A2.01 (1.37–5.46)1.24 (0.00–2.33) **9009 (734–11,450)
Group B3.18 (2.58–4.64)0.00 (0.00–0.13) ***9326 (7814–10,928)
Group C1.91 (0.00–3.38)NDND
Group D4.60 (1.47–10.13)0.28 (0.03–1.13)8625 (7405–10,782)
Group E2.96 (1.31–6.28)0.00 (0.00–0.40)8724 (6344–10,778)
Group F12.71 (1.62–3.67)0.00 (0.00–0.87)8717 (8132–13,177)
Group F23.68 (2.25–7.60)0.18 (0.02–0.59)8577 (8300–12,459)
ND, not determined due to insufficient sample; * p-value was calculated only on IL-4 results; ** p < 0.014 for group A vs. other groups; *** p = 0.011 for group B vs. other groups; Group A, HIV/HCV coinfected patients with detectable HCV RNA at end of treatment (EOT); Group B, HIV/HCV coinfected patients achieving sustained virological response (SVR); Group C, HIV/HCV coinfected DAA relapsers; Group D, HCV monoinfected patients achieving SVR; Group E, HCV monoinfected DAA relapsers; Group F1, untreated HIV/HCV coinfected patients; Group F2, untreated HCV monoinfected patients.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lapa, D.; Del Porto, P.; Minosse, C.; D’Offizi, G.; Antinori, A.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Visco-Comandini, U.; McPhee, F.; Garbuglia, A.R.; Zaccarelli, M. Clinical Relevance of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in HIV/HCV Coinfected and HCV Monoinfected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102092

AMA Style

Lapa D, Del Porto P, Minosse C, D’Offizi G, Antinori A, Capobianchi MR, Visco-Comandini U, McPhee F, Garbuglia AR, Zaccarelli M. Clinical Relevance of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in HIV/HCV Coinfected and HCV Monoinfected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(10):2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lapa, Daniele, Paola Del Porto, Claudia Minosse, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Andrea Antinori, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Ubaldo Visco-Comandini, Fiona McPhee, Anna Rosa Garbuglia, and Mauro Zaccarelli. 2021. "Clinical Relevance of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in HIV/HCV Coinfected and HCV Monoinfected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 10: 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop