Next Article in Journal
Bead-Containing Superhydrophobic Nanofiber Membrane for Membrane Distillation
Previous Article in Journal
Cryptotanshinone-Induced Permeabilization of Model Phospholipid Membranes: A Biophysical Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulation, Fabrication and Microfiltration Using Dual Anodic Aluminum Oxide Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Membrane Separation Processes in Wastewater and Water Purification, Volume II

by
Alexandre Giacobbo
* and
Andréa Moura Bernardes
*
Post-Graduation Program in Mining, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (PPGE3M), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Av. Bento Gonçalves n. 9500, Agronomia, Porto Alegre 91509-900, RS, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2024, 14(6), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14060119
Submission received: 16 May 2024 / Accepted: 20 May 2024 / Published: 22 May 2024

1. Introduction

Water is a crucial natural resource, essential for the development of a range of human activities, from agricultural and industrial to domestic; therefore, its availability is associated with a region or country’s economic growth [1,2]. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate use of this good can cause its scarcity, whether in terms of quality, quantity, or both, putting at risk the living conditions of future generations [3,4].
Currently, 2.2 billion people do not have access to drinking water, around 1.5 billion face shortages year-round, and 4 billion—that is, half of the world’s population—live under severe water scarcity during at least one month each year [5]. This scenario is even more worrying given that the demand for water is constantly increasing due to rapid population growth, urbanization, consumerist culture, and rising pressure from agriculture, industry, and the energy sector. According to information from the UNDP, 700 million people could be displaced from their homelands by 2030 due to water scarcity [6].
These factors are aggravated by the fact that a large part of wastewater is discarded into the environment without undergoing adequate treatment or even without any treatment at all, contaminating the available water resources [6,7]. Nowadays, the disposal of untreated wastewater is unacceptable, as, in addition to polluting natural water resources, which makes their use in natura unfeasible and the treatment of this water more expensive, it also represents a waste of resources, going against the current economic gold standard, which advocates for circular economy practices [8]. Furthermore, it is already widely known that in circumstances of water scarcity, wastewater is considered a valuable water resource; as previously stated, the global situation of water scarcity has deteriorated over the years. Also, within the scope of the circular economy and sustainable development, wastewater can be considered a crucial renewable resource [9]. In this regard, data in the literature point to an increase in wastewater reuse in recent decades in various parts of the world [2,10,11]. In California, for example, wastewater reuse doubled from 1970 to 2001 [12]. In 2010, 20% of wastewater was reused and the remainder was discarded into the ocean; a reversal of this scenario, in which 80% of wastewater will be reused and only 20% disposed of, is expected by 2030 [13].
In fact, several factors, such as the water crisis, tax policies, stricter regulations, and environmental awareness, have boosted the reuse of wastewater. Moreover, various technological and innovation aspects have been identified as drivers of water reuse practices; these include the development of new technologies and treatment processes, the optimization of processes and operational conditions, the integration of different technologies, and innovations implemented in existing technologies and processes, as well as the study and development of new materials.
In this context, since the early 1960s, with the development of the Loeb–Sourirajan process to produce anisotropic reverse osmosis membranes for desalination, research into the field of membranes has increased immensely [14]. Since then, membrane separation processes have been gaining more and more prominence, not only as a desalination technology but also in water treatment for potabilization, hardness softening, production of ultrapure water, and the treatment of a wide range of wastewater types, as well as in separation processes in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology industries, among others.
Indeed, the success of a wide range of applications and the increasing expansion of the usage of membrane separation processes, when compared to conventional (waste)water treatment or separation processes, are associated not only with decreased membrane production costs but also with the inherent characteristics of these technologies, which include low energy consumption, fewer process steps, ease of scale-up, small footprint, high separation efficiency, and high quality of the final product, in addition to ensuring greater safety of the process as a whole.
With these advantages in mind, in 2020, we launched the first Special Issue of Membranes, entitled “Membrane Separation Process in Wastewater and Water Purification” [15], in which we intended to cover recent developments and advances in all aspects related to membrane-based processes for obtaining pure and ultrapure water, treatment of brines and hypersaline solutions, development of new materials for water or wastewater purification, development/integration of processes for wastewater and water purification, concentration polarization and fouling, and recovery of water or resources. Six research papers were published in the first Special Issue:
  • The Effect of pH on Atenolol/Nanofiltration Membranes Affinity, doi:10.3390/membranes11090689;
  • Application of Coagulation–Membrane Rotation to Improve Ultrafiltration Performance in Drinking Water Treatment, doi:10.3390/membranes11080643;
  • Fabrication of Cementitious Microfiltration Membrane and Its Catalytic Ozonation for the Removal of Small Molecule Organic Pollutants, doi:10.3390/membranes11070532;
  • Study of the Ecological Footprint and Carbon Footprint in a Reverse Osmosis Sea Water Desalination Plant, doi:10.3390/membranes11060377;
  • Direct Purification of Digestate Using Ultrafiltration Membranes: Influence of Pore Size on Filtration Behavior and Fouling Characteristics, doi:10.3390/membranes11030179;
  • Oily Water Separation Process Using Hydrocyclone of Porous Membrane Wall: A Numerical Investigation, doi:10.3390/membranes11020079.
In 2022, likewise looking to collate publications that encompass recent developments and advances in all aspects related to membrane-based processes, we launched Volume II. In total, five articles were published in this Special Issue, and they are briefly described in the coming paragraphs. This Editorial does not intend to elaborate on each of the articles but rather to encourage you, the reader, to delve into them.

2. Articles Published in this Special Issue

Nasution and collaborators (Contribution 1) investigated the development of PVDF and tin dioxide hybrid membranes. The manufacturing process was assisted by electric field treatment in order to homogenize the distribution of tin dioxide particles in the polymeric matrix, in addition to reducing porosity and increasing the resistance and resilience of the membranes.
Contribution 2 (Qasim et al.) deals with the simulation and fabrication of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes and their application as microfiltration for fluid purification. The authors assessed a system with two layers of AAO membranes with different pore sizes, achieving an effective purification of fluids. In fact, the authors report that the main applications of the developed membranes and of the evaluated system are in microfluidic devices for fluid filtration, blood filtration, and biomedical analysis. Nevertheless, they also point to these systems as potential candidates for the filtration of water and other liquids.
Alebrahim and Moreau (Contribution 3) fabricated photocatalytic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes decorated with titanium dioxide using the suspension plasma spray process. The thickness of the membranes was controlled by the number of plasma spray passes (up to 12 cycles) over the surface of the substrates. They evaluated the membranes for filtration performance using silica particles of different sizes and polyethylene oxide with molecular weights from 20 kDa to 1000 kDa as well as fouling parameters and self-cleaning capacity under visible light by filtering solutions with organic pollutants, such as humic acid and methylene blue dye. They demonstrated that the rejection rate rises as membrane thickness increases, especially for ultrafiltration membranes, in which larger-surface pores are filled with agglomerates of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Furthermore, the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles was effective in recovering the flux for both membranes under visible light illumination.
The leaching of pollutants from contaminated soil and sludge and the resulting water contamination are also a matter of concern. From this perspective, Contribution 4, by Hadi and Awadh, deals with the electro-kinetic remediation of chromium-polluted sludge with and without the use of membranes. The apparatus used in their study consists of an electrochemical cell with three compartments (anodic, central, and cathodic), filled, respectively, with deionized water at pH ≈ 10, chromium-contaminated sludge, and acetic acid at pH ≈ 3. Graphite electrodes coupled to a power source were used, and anion and cation exchange membranes were placed close to the anode and cathode compartments, respectively. Under the best operating conditions, the study accomplished chromium removal rates greater than 80%, illustrating that the electro-kinetic remediation of toxic-metal-contaminated sludge with ion-selective membranes is a promising technique and paving the way for the development of further studies to enable its large-scale application.
Sustainable development has become a guiding principle for companies and organizations; not only does it allow them to continuously improve, but may also make or break their position on the market. In light of this, the article by Alvizuri-Tintaya and co-workers (Contribution 5) deals with the mathematical and statistical evaluation of reverse osmosis in the removal of manganese as a way to achieve sustainable operating parameters. In their study, the authors raise the problems associated with manganese mining, such as water contamination, health risks, and forms of water treatment to remove this metal, focusing on reverse osmosis treatment. They demonstrate that it is possible to remove manganese with reverse osmosis at low pressures, thus reducing the operating costs of the treatment system. This opens up the possibility of implementing reverse osmosis in contexts where water contamination problems and economic limitations are present.

3. Conclusions and Future Directions

This compilation of articles covers research devoted not only to using membrane separation processes for waste(water) purification but also to the development of membranes with special properties or for specific applications, as in the cases of Contribution 3, which deals with TiO2 photocatalytic membranes with self-cleaning capacity, Contribution 2, which investigates a microfiltration device using a dual anodic aluminum oxide membrane, and Contribution 1, which assesses the application of an electric field in the manufacture of PVDF–tin dioxide membranes. Contribution 5, in turn, addresses a current and important topic in which membrane-based processes have shown prominence, namely sustainability in water treatment systems. Finally, an impressive article (Contribution 4) explores the electro-kinetic technique with ion-selective membranes for removing toxic metals from contaminated soils and sludge.
There are still many aspects to be improved in the field of membranes and membrane separation processes. Based on the articles published in this Special Issue, we identified the following directions:
  • Studies report that tin dioxide has photocatalytic [16] and biocidal [17] activity; therefore, it is important to further investigate the photo-self-cleaning and antifouling capabilities of polymeric membranes decorated with this material. Different quantities and sizes of tin dioxide (nano)particles in different polymer matrices can also be evaluated. The same principle could be used for other types of (nano)particles, such as TiO2, Ag, and Cu, among others. Furthermore, the treatment of membranes with electric fields also deserves further studies;
  • Although they have been indicated for possible water filtration applications, devices with dual anodic aluminum oxide membranes have found widespread use in microfluidic separation and purification, suggesting that its potential use for a wide range of real fluids should also be tested. Furthermore, experiments should be conducted on different combinations of membranes and operating conditions;
  • From the perspective of the 2030 Agenda, discussing the sustainability of membrane separation processes in (waste)water treatment is imperative. Although one of the articles in this Special Issue addresses this matter, there is still much to be explored. Future studies on this matter will contribute to a greater application of membrane technologies;
  • The usage of membranes in the electro-kinetic remediation of contaminated soils and sludge opens up a vast field of research. For instance, the evaluation of other types of membranes (homogeneous and heterogeneous) that can be manufactured from several materials, the assessment of other anodic and cathodic solutions, as well as variations in operating conditions, electrochemical cell geometry, and target contaminants merit consideration in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and A.M.B.; methodology, A.G.; formal analysis, A.G.; investigation, A.G.; data curation, A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G. and A.M.B.; visualization, A.G.; supervision, A.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors are grateful to all the authors that contributed to this Special Issue. A.G. thanks FAPERGS-RITEs-Process no. 22/2551-0000393-1 for the fellowship he received.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Nasution, M.S.; Mataram, A.; Yani, I.; Septano, G.D. Characteristics of a PVDF–Tin Dioxide Membrane Assisted by Electric Field Treatment. Membranes 2022, 12, 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12080772.
  • Qasim, F.; Ashraf, M.W.; Tayyaba, S.; Tariq, M.I.; Herrera-May, A.L. Simulation, Fabrication and Microfiltration Using Dual Anodic Aluminum Oxide Membrane. Membranes 2023, 13, 825. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13100825.
  • Alebrahim, E.; Moreau, C. A Comparative Study of the Self-Cleaning and Filtration Performance of Suspension Plasma-Sprayed TiO2 Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Membranes. Membranes 2023, 13, 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090750.
  • Hadi, N.S.; Awadh, H.H. Study of the Removal Efficiency of Chromium Ions Using a Membrane by Electro-Kinetic Technique from Sludge. Membranes 2023, 13, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090806.
  • Alvizuri-Tintaya, P.A.; Villena-Martínez, E.M.; Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, V.G.; Torregrosa-López, J.I.; Lora-García, J.; d’Abzac, P. Mathematical and Statistical Evaluation of Reverse Osmosis in the Removal of Manganese as a Way to Achieve Sustainable Operating Parameters. Membranes 2023, 13, 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080724.

References

  1. Albornoz, L.L.; Centurião, T.C.; Giacobbo, A.; Zoppas-Ferreira, J.; Bernardes, A.M. Influence of Rain Events on the Efficiency of a Compact Wastewater Treatment Plant: A Case Study on a University Campus Aiming Water Reuse for Agriculture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 41350–41360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fito, J.; Van Hulle, S.W.H. Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Potentials in Agriculture: Towards Environmental Sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 2949–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meadows, D.; Randers, J.; Meadows, D. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update; Chelsea Green Publishing: London, UK, 2004; ISBN 1603581553. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rich, D.; Andiroglu, E.; Gallo, K.; Ramanathan, S. A Review of Water Reuse Applications and Effluent Standards in Response to Water Scarcity. Water Secur. 2023, 20, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. UNDP. At the Core of Sustainable Development WATER. Available online: https://www.undp.org/water (accessed on 30 April 2024).
  6. UN DESA. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022; 66p, ISBN 978-92-1-101448-8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Soo, A.; Kim, J.; Shon, H.K. Technologies for the Wastewater Circular Economy—A Review. Desalination Water Treat. 2024, 317, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. OECD. Towards a More Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy: The Role of the G20; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Rome, Italy, 2021; 51p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Diaz-Elsayed, N.; Rezaei, N.; Guo, T.; Mohebbi, S.; Zhang, Q. Wastewater-Based Resource Recovery Technologies across Scale: A Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 145, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Angelakis, A.N.; Asano, T.; Bahri, A.; Jimenez, B.E.; Tchobanoglous, G. Water Reuse: From Ancient to Modern Times and the Future. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salgot, M.; Huertas, E. Integrated Concepts for Reuse of Upgraded Wastewater; AQUAREC: Barcelona, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bischel, H.N.; Simon, G.L.; Frisby, T.M.; Luthy, R.G. Management Experiences and Trends for Water Reuse Implementation in Northern California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Angelakis, A.N.; Snyder, S.A. Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: Past, Present, and Future. Water 2015, 7, 4887–4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baker, R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 2012; ISBN 0470854456. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giacobbo, A.; Bernardes, A.M. Membrane Separation Process in Wastewater and Water Purification. Membranes 2022, 12, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al-Hamdi, A.M.; Rinner, U.; Sillanpää, M. Tin Dioxide as a Photocatalyst for Water Treatment: A Review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 107, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Filgueiras, C.A.L. A Nova Química Do Estanho. Quim Nova 1998, 21, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giacobbo, A.; Bernardes, A.M. Membrane Separation Processes in Wastewater and Water Purification, Volume II. Membranes 2024, 14, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14060119

AMA Style

Giacobbo A, Bernardes AM. Membrane Separation Processes in Wastewater and Water Purification, Volume II. Membranes. 2024; 14(6):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14060119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giacobbo, Alexandre, and Andréa Moura Bernardes. 2024. "Membrane Separation Processes in Wastewater and Water Purification, Volume II" Membranes 14, no. 6: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14060119

APA Style

Giacobbo, A., & Bernardes, A. M. (2024). Membrane Separation Processes in Wastewater and Water Purification, Volume II. Membranes, 14(6), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14060119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop