Next Article in Journal
Augmenting the Immune Response against a Stabilized HIV-1 Clade C Envelope Trimer by Silica Nanoparticle Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Course and Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality of 205 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia in Como, Lombardy Region, Italy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/vaccines9060641
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Murine CD8+ T Cell Epitope Identified in the Receptor-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein

by
Jihyun Yang
1,†,
Eunjin Kim
1,2,†,
Jong-Soo Lee
2 and
Haryoung Poo
1,*
1
Infectious Disease Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Korea
2
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Vaccines 2021, 9(6), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060641
Received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 1 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has posed a devastating threat worldwide. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein is one of the most important antigens for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, while the analysis of CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in preclinical studies using mouse models is critical for evaluating vaccine efficacy. Here, we immunized C57BL/6 wild-type mice and transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with the SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein to evaluate the IFN-γ-producing T cells in the splenocytes of the immunized mice using an overlapping peptide pool by an enzyme-linked immunospot assay and flow cytometry. We identified SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 as a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted epitope for the RBD-specific CD8 T cell responses in C57BL/6 mice.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative pathogen of human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1,2]. COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic by the WHO in 2020 and has inflicted tremendous negative impacts on global health, society, and economic institutions. As vaccination is considered to be one of the most effective methods for preventing the rapid global spread of this disease, many researchers and companies in the world are attempting to develop safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines [3]. Most COVID-19 vaccine candidates have focused on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein as the vaccine antigen [4]. The SARS-CoV-2 RBD primarily binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and facilitates the entry of the virus into host cells [5]. The protective efficacy of the vaccine is conferred by the induction of humoral immunity such as neutralizing antibodies and cell-mediated immunity. CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play a critical role in eliminating virus-infected cells, thereby leading to the effective clearance of viral infection. In particular, CTL activity is important to provide long-term protection from reinfection of the virus [6]. Recently, a clinical report also showed the importance of T cell immunity in COVID-19 recovery [7]. Of patients with severe COVID-19, a significantly higher expression of surface markers for T cell activation was observed in the recovering group than the severe group, whereas no significant differences were observed for neutralizing antibodies in both groups. To analyze the CTL activity induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the overlapping peptide pool for T cell stimulation was used due to the CTL epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 presently being unidentified [8,9,10]. A recent study reported SARS-CoV-2 S526–533 as a CTL epitope in BALB/c mice, through the experimental evaluation of programming-predicted peptides [11]. C57BL/6 mice have been widely used for the evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [8,9]. Transgenic mice with a C57BL/6 genetic background expressing human ACE2 (hACE2) are currently being used as an animal model of SARS-CoV-2 study [12,13,14,15]; however, the CTL epitope in C57BL/6 mice has not yet been identified. Additionally, many experimental approaches aimed at quantifying SARS-CoV-2-specific CTL activity have used RBD peptide pools, which are associated with limitations such as high cost and time-consuming synthesis of peptides [8,10]. Thus, finding a murine CTL epitope is important to resolve the limitations and to identify a peptide that can be used for exactly analyzing SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cell activity when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates in an animal model. In this study, we identified a murine CD8 T cell epitope of the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD using C57BL/6 wild-type and hACE2-expressing transgenic (K18-hACE2) mice. To our knowledge, this is the first report to indicate that SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 is a CD8 T cell epitope in the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in a C57BL/6 mouse model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice

C57BL/6 wild-type (OrientBio, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (Jackson Laboratory) were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB). Mouse care and experiments were reviewed and conducted under guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of KRIBB (KRIBB-AEC-20279).

2.2. Reagents

Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD protein was purchased from Sino Biologics (Shanghai, China) and produced in HEK293 mammalian cells using a codon-optimized plasmid encoding SARS-CoV-2 RBD (amino acid residues (aa) 319–541 of SARS-CoV-2 S (accession no. YP_009724390.1)). The Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS), composed of monophosphoryl lipid A and squalene, was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. Synthetic RBD peptides (8–11-mer and 15-mer peptides) were chemically synthesized by AnyGen (Gwangju, South Korea) and Peptron (Daejeon, South Korea) (summarized in Table 1 and Table 2). The endotoxin-free EndoFit OVA protein and OVA257–264 peptide were obtained from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA) and AnaSpec (San Jose, CA, USA), respectively. Mouse IgG2a isotype control monoclonal antibody (mAb) was obtained from Bio X Cell (West Lebanon, NH, USA), and fluorescent dye-conjugated antibodies, anti-H2-Kb and anti-H2-Db mAbs, were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA).

2.3. Immunization

Six- to 10-week-old female mice were randomly distributed in groups of 3 to 5 mice and intramuscularly (i.m.) immunized with 5 μg of RBD recombinant protein combined with SAS on days 0 and 14. In a separate experiment, wild-type mice were immunized i.m. with 10 μg of OVA protein plus SAS twice, with a two-week interval. One week after the last immunization, mononuclear splenocytes were generated by mincing whole mouse spleens, followed by the lysis of red blood cells and 70-μm filtration. Splenocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, Dublin, Ireland).

2.4. Interferon-γ Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISPOT) Assay

Antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing spot forming units (SFUs) were evaluated using mouse IFN-γ ELISPOT kits (BD Biosciences). Splenocytes were plated at 1 × 106 cells/well onto purified IFN-γ antibody-coated PVDF-backed plates and stimulated with an RBD peptide pool (2 μg/mL each), 5 μg/mL individual peptide, or 5 μg/mL OVA257–264 at 37 °C for 2 days. In a separate experiment, splenocytes were stimulated with 10-mer peptides (5 μg/mL) in the presence of mouse IgG2a isotype as a control, anti-H2Kb and/or anti-H2Db mAbs (20 μg/mL) at 37 °C for 2 days. The IFN-γ-positive SFUs were enumerated using an ELISPOT plate reader (Cellular Technology Ltd., Cleveland, OH, USA).

2.5. Flow Cytometry Intracellular Cytokine Staining

Splenocytes at 1 × 106 cells/well were exposed to an RBD peptide pool (2 μg/mL for each peptide) or 5 μg/mL of each peptide in the presence of a protein transport inhibitor containing brefeldin A (BD Biosciences) for 12 h at 37 °C. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed according to a protocol modified from a previous paper [8]. The treated cells were incubated with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Red Dead Cell stain (Invitrogen) for 20 min at room temperature. The cells were washed, incubated with an anti-CD16/32 antibody (2.4G2) solution to block the Fc receptor, and stained for surface markers (CD3ε, CD4, and CD8 molecules), followed by intracellular IFN-γ cytokine staining using the Foxp3/transcription factor buffer set (eBioscience). The antibodies used were anti-CD3ε BUV737 (17A2), anti-CD4 APC (RM4–5), anti-CD8α PE-Cy7 (53–6.7), and anti-IFN-γ BV650 (XMG1.2). All the antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences. The stained cells were acquired on a FACS Aria Fusion (BD Biosciences) and were analyzed via FlowJoTM V10 (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the analyses were performed using the PRISM software 9.0.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA), and p values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 Peptide Facilitates IFN-γ Production of CD8 T Cells in Splenocytes from Adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD-Immunized Mice

To identify the CTL epitope(s) of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD, C57BL/6 mice (n = 5) were i.m. immunized twice with SARS-CoV-2 RBD recombinant protein along with SAS—composed of monophosphoryl lipid A and squalene—with a two-week interval. One week after the last immunization, an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was performed by stimulating the splenocytes obtained from immunized mice with an RBD peptide pool of 42 synthetic RBD peptides with 15-mers overlapping by 5 aa (Table 1). As shown in Figure 1A, the number of IFN-γ SFUs was significantly increased in cells treated with 15th peptide out of 42 peptides (CFTNVYADSFVIRGD, corresponding to S391–405) (202 ± 96 SFUs) compared to that in the medium control (2 ± 3 SFUs) (p < 0.0001). The level of increase provoked by treatment with the S391–405 peptide was similar to the SFU values achieved via stimulation with the RBD peptide pool (214 ± 95 SFUs) (p < 0.0001). However, none of the other 41 individual RBD peptides induced the production of IFN-γ SFUs.
To confirm that S391–405-induced IFN-γ production was dependent on CD8 T cells but not CD4 T cells, splenocytes were subjected to intracellular IFN-γ staining. The gating strategy for flow cytometry employed is depicted in Figure 1B. In line with our expectations, the percentages of IFN-γ+ CD8 T cells were almost 1.7-fold higher in the S391–405-treated cells (1.25 ± 0.07%) than the medium-treated cells (0.80 ± 0.25%) (p = 0.0044) (Figure 1C). However, the percentages of IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells were similar between the S391–405- and medium-treated cells (p = 0.5667). Next, we assessed the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific CTL activity using K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (C57BL/6 background), which have been reported as an animal model suitable for SARS-CoV-2 studies [14]. When stimulating splenocytes from the RBD protein-immunized K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (n = 3) with the RBD peptide pool, the IFN-γ SFU numbers were also observed to be higher in the S391–405 peptide-stimulated cells (240 ± 64 SFUs) than in the control cells (5 ± 3 SFUs) (p = 0.0068). The extent of this finding is similar to the effect of stimulation with the RBD peptide pool (252 ± 81 SFUs) (p = 0.0053) (Figure 1D). These results suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 peptide contains CTL epitope(s) in the C57BL/6 mouse model.

3.2. SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 Acts as the MHC Class I H-2Kb/Db-Restricted Minimal CTL Epitope of SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD

As CD8 CTLs recognize foreign antigen peptides of 8–11 aa residues, we attempted to identify the minimum length of CTL epitope that could be recognized by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I on CD8 T cells. Splenocytes obtained from the RBD-immunized mice (n = 4) were harvested and subjected to IFN-γ ELISPOT with 8–11-mer peptides derived from SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 (Table 2). As shown in Figure 2A, none of the 8- or 9-mer peptides triggered a significant generation of IFN-γ SFUs. Of the 10-mer peptides, however, a significantly higher number of IFN-γ SFUs was observed after treatment with peptide #5 only (VYADSFVIRG, corresponding to S395–404; 119 ± 47 SFUs) than with the medium control (2 ± 2 SFUs) (p = 0.0023). Two 11-mer peptides, including S395–404, also significantly augmented IFN-γ SFU numbers (190 ± 78 SFUs for peptide #4, corresponding to S394–404; 157 ± 100 SFUs for peptide #5, corresponding to S395–405) (p < 0.0001). Flow cytometry also showed that the percentages of IFN-γ+ CD8 T cells were significantly higher (three-fold) in the cells treated with only the S395–404 peptide (1.3 ± 0.12%) than in those treated with other 10-mer peptides (0.36 ± 0.06, 0.37 ± 0.1, 0.37 ± 0.08, 0.41 ± 0.11, and 0.41 ± 0.07% for peptide numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, respectively) (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2B). These results indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide is a minimal epitope for CTLs specific for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD.
Finally, we tested MHC restriction for the recognition of the SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide using antibodies blocking MHC class I, such as anti-H-2Kb and anti-H-2Db mAbs, via an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. The S395–404-increasing IFN-γ SFUs (115 ± 42 SFUs) were similar to those for cells treated with the mAb isotype (111 ± 45 SFUs) (p = 0.9999) (Figure 2C). However, the IFN-γ SFUs were significantly blocked by treatment with anti-H-2Kb mAb (21 ± 3 SFUs; p = 0.0112), anti-H-2Db mAb (24 ± 5 SFUs; p = 0.0142), or a mixture of both (17 ± 12 SFUs; p = 0.0079), as compared with treatment with the mAb isotype. Furthermore, when using splenocytes from the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-immunized K18-hACE2 mice (n = 3), the S395–404 peptide significantly augmented IFN-γ SFU numbers (104 ± 20 SFUs) compared to the medium control (3 ± 5 SFUs) (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2D). Similar S395–404-inducing IFN-γ SFU numbers were observed in cells treated with the control mAb isotype (80 ± 14 SFUs) (p = 0.1213). However, these numbers were significantly decreased by the addition of anti-H-2Kb mAb (5 ± 3 SFUs), anti-H-2Db mAb (9 ± 4 SFUs), or a mixture of both (9 ± 3 SFUs) (p < 0.0001). To confirm our results, we tested splenocytes from OVA-immunized mice (n = 3) using the well-known CTL epitope OVA257–264 [16]. After the stimulation of splenocytes with OVA257–264, significant production of IFN-γ SFUs was observed in the OVA-immunized mice (54 ± 5 SFUs and 52 ± 10 SFUs, in the absence and presence of isotype mAb, respectively), as compared with that in the medium control (0 SFU) (p < 0.0001). However, treatment with both anti-H-2Kb and anti-H-2Db mAbs significantly inhibited OVA257–264-stimulated IFN-γ SFU production (18 ± 6 SFUs after treatment with anti-H-2Kb mAb, p = 0.0002; 13 ± 6 SFUs after treatment with anti-H-2Db mAb, p = 0.0004; 8 ± 9 SFUs after treatment with anti-H-2Kb/Db mAbs, p = 0.0001) (Figure 2E). Collectively, these data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 is the MHC class I H-2Kb/Db-restricted CTL epitope of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD in the C57BL/6 mouse model.

4. Discussion

The SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide, VYADSFVIRG, is localized upstream of the receptor-binding motif within the RBD region and is not absolutely identical to the SARS-CoV S382–391 peptide (VYADSFVVKG, Accession no. YP_009825051.1). A previous study reported SARS-CoV S436–443 (YNKKYRYL) and S525–532 (VNFNFNGL) as H-2Kb-restricted epitopes [17]; however, these sequences were not found in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The SARS-CoV-2 S526–533 peptide (GPKKSTNL) was recently reported to be the H-2Kd-restricted CTL epitope in BALB/c mice [11]. However, the S526–533-containing peptide #42 did not induce generation of IFN-γ+ cells from immunized C57BL/6 mice, as shown in Figure 1A, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 might be a unique CTL epitope of the SARS-CoV-2 S RBD in the C57BL/6 mouse model. Similarly to our results, some peptides, including glycoprotein33–43 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [18] and the ovalbumin peptide (OVA257–264) [16], have been reported to be the H-2Kb/Db-binding epitope. Further studies are needed to measure the binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide to MHC class I molecules.
Various domains within SARS-CoV S protein are considered SARS-CoV-2 vaccine targets. RBD domain is one of the important antigens for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and several RBD-based vaccine candidates have been tested in clinical trials [19]. Of them, lipid nanoparticle-formulated RBD mRNA vaccine candidates are reported to induce both neutralizing antibody response and T cell activation in preclinical [20,21] and clinical fields [22]. Aluminum-adjuvanted RBD vaccine candidate is reported to increase neutralizing antibody response rather than T cell immunity in mice, rabbits and non-human primates [23]. A recombinant subunit vaccine candidate containing the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and the Fc fragment of human lgG is shown that increase neutralizing antibody response only in a mouse model [24]. Several studies have reported that SARS-CoV-specific CD8 CTLs substantially protected against SARS-CoV infection in mice [25] and were increased in mice that were vaccinated with SARS-CoV S DNA as the vaccine antigen [26]. As an increase in CTL activity specific to SARS-CoV-2 has been reported in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COVID-19 convalescent patients [27], SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs may have a protective role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Translation of the vaccine immunity in human subjects may be difficult to accurately predict from animal models, but animal models is most useful in stratifying the vaccine candidates through careful evaluation of vaccine efficacy before clinical trials [28]. Many experimental approaches aimed at quantifying SARS-CoV-2-specific CTL activity have used RBD peptide pools having limitations such as expensive and time-consuming synthesis of peptides [8,10].
Our findings would be useful for resolving these problems and could be beneficial for evaluating SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-specific CTL responses and studying T cell functions. Moreover, these findings may be helpful for the generation of a tetrameric MHC–peptide complex that can be used to directly quantify and visualize SARS-CoV-2 S RBD-specific T cells [29]. Taken together, the identification of SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 as the CTL epitope may facilitate the evaluation of CTL activity of RBD-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates in a mouse model and the investigation of CTL function in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

5. Conclusions

Identification of the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-specific CTL epitope is necessary to exactly analyze SARS-CoV-2-specific CTL activity and to solve problems of costly and time-consuming peptide synthesis for peptide pools. Our finding of SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 as the CTL epitope is helpful in the study of SARS-CoV-2-specific CTL functions and the evaluation of CTL activity of RBD-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates using a mouse model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P.; methodology, J.Y. and E.K. formal analysis, J.Y. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y. and E.K.; writing—review and editing, H.P.; supervision, H.P. and J.-S.L.; project administration, H.P.; funding acquisition, H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative Program (KGM9942112).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Mouse handling and experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of KRIBB (KRIBB-AEC-20279).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cohen, J.; Normile, D. New SARS-like virus in China triggers alarm. Science 2020, 367, 234–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report—62. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200322-sitrep-62-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=f7764c46_2 (accessed on 22 March 2020).
  3. Mullard, A. COVID-19 vaccine development pipeline gears up. Lancet 2020, 395, 1751–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Graham, B.S. Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development. Science 2020, 368, 945–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lan, J.; Ge, J.; Yu, J.; Shan, S.; Zhou, H.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 2020, 581, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Appay, V.; Douek, D.C.; Price, D.A. CD8+ T cell efficacy in vaccination and disease. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Z.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Mei, X.; Zhong, J.; Zhao, J.; Ran, P. COVID-19 Severity Correlates with Weaker T-Cell Immunity, Hypercytokinemia, and Lung Epithelium Injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Corbett, K.S.; Edwards, D.K.; Leist, S.R.; Abiona, O.M.; Boyoglu-Barnum, S.; Gillespie, R.A.; Himansu, S.; Schafer, A.; Ziwawo, C.T.; DiPiazza, A.T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature 2020, 586, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, T.R.F.; Patel, A.; Ramos, S.; Elwood, D.; Zhu, X.; Yan, J.; Gary, E.N.; Walker, S.N.; Schultheis, K.; Purwar, M.; et al. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van Doremalen, N.; Lambe, T.; Spencer, A.; Belij-Rammerstorfer, S.; Purushotham, J.N.; Port, J.R.; Avanzato, V.A.; Bushmaker, T.; Flaxman, A.; Ulaszewska, M.; et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature 2020, 586, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muraoka, D.; Situo, D.; Sawada, S.I.; Akiyoshi, K.; Harada, N.; Ikeda, H. Identification of a dominant CD8(+) CTL epitope in the SARS-associated coronavirus 2 spike protein. Vaccine 2020, 38, 7697–7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Golden, J.W.; Cline, C.R.; Zeng, X.; Garrison, A.R.; Carey, B.D.; Mucker, E.M.; White, L.E.; Shamblin, J.D.; Brocato, R.L.; Liu, J.; et al. Human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop severe and fatal respiratory disease. JCI Insight 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Johansen, M.D.; Irving, A.; Montagutelli, X.; Tate, M.D.; Rudloff, I.; Nold, M.F.; Hansbro, N.G.; Kim, R.Y.; Donovan, C.; Liu, G.; et al. Animal and translational models of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 877–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oladunni, F.S.; Park, J.G.; Pino, P.A.; Gonzalez, O.; Akhter, A.; Allue-Guardia, A.; Olmo-Fontanez, A.; Gautam, S.; Garcia-Vilanova, A.; Ye, C.; et al. Lethality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18 human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Winkler, E.S.; Bailey, A.L.; Kafai, N.M.; Nair, S.; McCune, B.T.; Yu, J.; Fox, J.M.; Chen, R.E.; Earnest, J.T.; Keeler, S.P.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lungs of human ACE2 transgenic mice causes severe inflammation, immune cell infiltration, and compromised respiratory function. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ip, P.P.; Nijman, H.W.; Daemen, T. Epitope Prediction Assays Combined with Validation Assays Strongly Narrows down Putative Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Epitopes. Vaccines 2015, 3, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  17. Zhou, M.; Xu, D.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Shan, M.; Tang, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, F.S.; Zhu, X.; Tao, H.; et al. Screening and identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus-specific CTL epitopes. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 2138–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hudrisier, D.; Oldstone, M.B.; Gairin, J.E. The signal sequence of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus contains an immunodominant cytotoxic T cell epitope that is restricted by both H-2D(b) and H-2K(b) molecules. Virology 1997, 234, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  19. Min, L.; Sun, Q. Antibodies and Vaccines Target RBD of SARS-CoV-2. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 671633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, N.N.; Li, X.F.; Deng, Y.Q.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.J.; Yang, G.; Huang, W.J.; Gao, P.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, R.R.; et al. A Thermostable mRNA Vaccine against COVID-19. Cell 2020, 182, 1271–1283.e1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vogel, A.B.; Kanevsky, I.; Che, Y.; Swanson, K.A.; Muik, A.; Vormehr, M.; Kranz, L.M.; Walzer, K.C.; Hein, S.; Guler, A.; et al. BNT162b vaccines protect rhesus macaques from SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2021, 592, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sahin, U.; Muik, A.; Derhovanessian, E.; Vogler, I.; Kranz, L.M.; Vormehr, M.; Baum, A.; Pascal, K.; Quandt, J.; Maurus, D.; et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature 2020, 586, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.; Lu, S.; Yang, F.; Bi, Z.; Bao, L.; Mo, F.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; et al. A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity. Nature 2020, 586, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Z.; Xu, W.; Xia, S.; Gu, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Y.; Cai, X.; Qu, D.; et al. RBD-Fc-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate induces highly potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody response. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2020, 5, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Channappanavar, R.; Fett, C.; Zhao, J.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Perlman, S. Virus-specific memory CD8 T cells provide substantial protection from lethal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 11034–11044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  26. Zhao, K.; Yang, B.; Xu, Y.; Wu, C. CD8+ T cell response in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice is elicited by epitopes from SARS-CoV S protein. Vaccine 2010, 28, 6666–6674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Habel, J.R.; Nguyen, T.H.O.; van de Sandt, C.E.; Juno, J.A.; Chaurasia, P.; Wragg, K.; Koutsakos, M.; Hensen, L.; Jia, X.; Chua, B.; et al. Suboptimal SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8(+) T cell response associated with the prominent HLA-A*02:01 phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 24384–24391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Golding, H.; Khurana, S.; Zaitseva, M. What Is the Predictive Value of Animal Models for Vaccine Efficacy in Humans? The Importance of Bridging Studies and Species-Independent Correlates of Protection. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Sims, S.; Willberg, C.; Klenerman, P. MHC-peptide tetramers for the analysis of antigen-specific T cells. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2010, 9, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vaccines 09 00641 g001 550
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 elicits IFN-γ production by CD8 T cells in splenocytes of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice. C57BL/6 mice (n = 5) were immunized i.m. with RBD recombinant protein plus Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS) twice with a two-week interval. One week from the final immunization, cells were harvested from spleens of the immunized mice. (A) Splenocytes were simulated with 5 μg/mL of each RBD peptide or a peptide pool (each 2 μg/mL) for 2 days to evaluate CD8 CTL activity via an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F(43, 129) = 12.22, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001, medium vs. #15 or peptide pool). (B) Gating strategy for analysis of T cell subsets in flow cytometry. (C) Splenocytes stimulated with peptide #15 (corresponding to S391–405) at 5 μg/mL in the presence of brefeldin A for 12 h. Percentages of IFN-γ+ T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was analyzed using two-sided unpaired t-tests (IFN-γ+ CD8 T cells: t(8) = 3.928, ** p = 0.0044; IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells: t(8) = 0.5976, p = 0.5667). (D) K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (n = 3) were immunized with SAS-adjuvanted RBD protein, and an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was performed by stimulating splenocytes with peptide #15 or an RBD peptide pool. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F(2, 6) = 16.54, p < 0.0036) (** p = 0.0068, medium vs. #15; ** p = 0.0053, medium vs. peptide pool). These experiments were performed three times, producing similar results. The bar graphs indicate the means with SDs. ns, not significant. Sharp-mark (#) indicates the order of individual peptide listed in overlapping 42 peptides.
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 elicits IFN-γ production by CD8 T cells in splenocytes of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice. C57BL/6 mice (n = 5) were immunized i.m. with RBD recombinant protein plus Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS) twice with a two-week interval. One week from the final immunization, cells were harvested from spleens of the immunized mice. (A) Splenocytes were simulated with 5 μg/mL of each RBD peptide or a peptide pool (each 2 μg/mL) for 2 days to evaluate CD8 CTL activity via an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F(43, 129) = 12.22, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001, medium vs. #15 or peptide pool). (B) Gating strategy for analysis of T cell subsets in flow cytometry. (C) Splenocytes stimulated with peptide #15 (corresponding to S391–405) at 5 μg/mL in the presence of brefeldin A for 12 h. Percentages of IFN-γ+ T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was analyzed using two-sided unpaired t-tests (IFN-γ+ CD8 T cells: t(8) = 3.928, ** p = 0.0044; IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells: t(8) = 0.5976, p = 0.5667). (D) K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (n = 3) were immunized with SAS-adjuvanted RBD protein, and an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was performed by stimulating splenocytes with peptide #15 or an RBD peptide pool. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F(2, 6) = 16.54, p < 0.0036) (** p = 0.0068, medium vs. #15; ** p = 0.0053, medium vs. peptide pool). These experiments were performed three times, producing similar results. The bar graphs indicate the means with SDs. ns, not significant. Sharp-mark (#) indicates the order of individual peptide listed in overlapping 42 peptides.
Vaccines 09 00641 g001
Vaccines 09 00641 g002 550
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 increases H-2Kb/Db-restricted IFN-γ production. (A) Splenocytes were harvested from SAS-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice (n = 4) and stimulated with 8–11-mer peptides within the SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 region. CD8 CTL activity was evaluated by enumerating IFN-γ SFUs via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(27, 84) = 13.37, p < 0.0001) (** p = 0.0023, medium vs. #5 of 10-mers; **** p < 0.0001, medium vs. #4 of 11-mers, #5 of 11-mers, medium vs. #15, or #15). (B) Percentages of IFN-γ-producing CD8 T cells were analyzed using 10-mer peptide-treated splenocytes via flow cytometry. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 18) = 63.64, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001). Splenocytes were harvested from adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice (n = 3) (C) and K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (n = 3) (D) and then stimulated with the SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide in the presence of anti-H-2Kb and/or anti-H-2Db mAb for 2 days to measure IFN-γ SFUs via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 12) = 11.32, p = 0.003; F(5, 12) = 55.3, p = 0.0001). p values are as follows: panel (C) ** p = 0.0022 between non-treatment and S391–405, ** p = 0.0029 between non-treatment and S391–405 plus isotype mA, * p = 0.0112 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Kb mAb, * p = 0.0142 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Db mAb, ** p = 0.0079 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Kb/ Db mAbs; (D) **** p < 0.0001 and p = 0.1213. (E) C57BL/6 mice (n = 3) were immunized i.m. with 10 μg of OVA protein plus SAS twice with a two-week interval. One week from the last immunization, splenocytes were harvested from the immunized mice and simulated with OVA257–264 peptide in the presence of anti-H-2Kb and/or anti-H-2Db mAb. Two days after incubation, IFN-γ SFUs were enumerated via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 12) = 33.69, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001, *** p = 0.0002 between OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb and OVA257–264 plus anti-H2-Kb mAb, *** p = 0.0004 between OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb and OVA257–264 plus anti-H2-Db mAb, and p = 0.9995 between OVA257–264 and OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb). These experiments were performed three times, with similar results. The bar graphs indicate the means with SDs. ns, not significant. Sharp-mark (#) indicates the order of individual peptide listed in overlapping 42 peptides.
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 increases H-2Kb/Db-restricted IFN-γ production. (A) Splenocytes were harvested from SAS-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice (n = 4) and stimulated with 8–11-mer peptides within the SARS-CoV-2 S391–405 region. CD8 CTL activity was evaluated by enumerating IFN-γ SFUs via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(27, 84) = 13.37, p < 0.0001) (** p = 0.0023, medium vs. #5 of 10-mers; **** p < 0.0001, medium vs. #4 of 11-mers, #5 of 11-mers, medium vs. #15, or #15). (B) Percentages of IFN-γ-producing CD8 T cells were analyzed using 10-mer peptide-treated splenocytes via flow cytometry. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 18) = 63.64, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001). Splenocytes were harvested from adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein-immunized C57BL/6 mice (n = 3) (C) and K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (n = 3) (D) and then stimulated with the SARS-CoV-2 S395–404 peptide in the presence of anti-H-2Kb and/or anti-H-2Db mAb for 2 days to measure IFN-γ SFUs via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 12) = 11.32, p = 0.003; F(5, 12) = 55.3, p = 0.0001). p values are as follows: panel (C) ** p = 0.0022 between non-treatment and S391–405, ** p = 0.0029 between non-treatment and S391–405 plus isotype mA, * p = 0.0112 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Kb mAb, * p = 0.0142 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Db mAb, ** p = 0.0079 between S391–405 plus isotype mAb and S391–405 plus anti-H2-Kb/ Db mAbs; (D) **** p < 0.0001 and p = 0.1213. (E) C57BL/6 mice (n = 3) were immunized i.m. with 10 μg of OVA protein plus SAS twice with a two-week interval. One week from the last immunization, splenocytes were harvested from the immunized mice and simulated with OVA257–264 peptide in the presence of anti-H-2Kb and/or anti-H-2Db mAb. Two days after incubation, IFN-γ SFUs were enumerated via the ELISPOT assay. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (F(5, 12) = 33.69, p < 0.0001) (**** p < 0.0001, *** p = 0.0002 between OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb and OVA257–264 plus anti-H2-Kb mAb, *** p = 0.0004 between OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb and OVA257–264 plus anti-H2-Db mAb, and p = 0.9995 between OVA257–264 and OVA257–264 plus isotype mAb). These experiments were performed three times, with similar results. The bar graphs indicate the means with SDs. ns, not significant. Sharp-mark (#) indicates the order of individual peptide listed in overlapping 42 peptides.
Vaccines 09 00641 g002
Table
Table 1. List of tested 15-mer receptor-binding domain (RBD) peptides of SARS-CoV-2 spike region.
Table 1. List of tested 15-mer receptor-binding domain (RBD) peptides of SARS-CoV-2 spike region.
Peptide IDStartEndSequence
1321335QPTESIVRFPNITNL
2326340IVRFPNITNLCPFGE
3331345NITNLCPFGEVFNAT
4336350CPFGEVFNATRFASV
5341355VFNATRFASVYAWNR
6346360RFASVYAWNRKRISN
7351365YAWNRKRISNCVADY
8356370KRISNCVADYSVLYN
9361375CVADYSVLYNSASFS
10366380SVLYNSASFSTFKCY
11371385SASFSTFKCYGVSPT
12376390TFKCYGVSPTKLNDL
13381395GVSPTKLNDLCFTNV
14386400KLNDLCFTNVYADSF
15391405CFTNVYADSFVIRGD
16396410YADSFVIRGDEVRQI
17401415VIRGDEVRQIAPGQT
18406420EVRQIAPGQTGKIAD
19411425APGQTGKIADYNYKL
20416430TKIADYNYKLPDDFT
21421435YNYKLPDDFTGCVIA
22426440PDDFTGCVIAWNSNN
23431445GCVIAWNSNNLDSKV
24436450WNSNNLDSKVGGNYN
25441455LDSKVGGNYNYLYRL
26446460GGNYNYLYRLFRKSN
27451465YLYRLFRKSNLKPFE
28456470FRKSNLKPFERDIST
29461475LKPFERDISTEIYQA
30466480RDISTEIYQAGSTPC
31471485EIYQAGSTPCNGVEG
32476490GSTPCNGVEGFNCYF
33481495NGVEGFNCYFPLQSY
34486500FNCYFPLQSYGFQPT
35491505PLQSYGFQPTNGVGY
36496510GFQPTNGVGYQPYRV
37501515NGVGYQPYRVVVLSF
38506520QPYRVVVLSFELLHA
39511525VVLSFELLHAPATVC
40516530ELLHAPATVCGPKKS
41521535PATVCGPKKSTNLVK
42526540CGKKSTNLVKNKCVN
The peptide capable of enhancing cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity is highlighted in bold.
Table
Table 2. List of tested 8–11-mer peptides within SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD391–405 region.
Table 2. List of tested 8–11-mer peptides within SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD391–405 region.
Peptide IDStartEndSequence
15-8-1391398CFTNVYAD
15-8-2392399FTNVYADS
15-8-3393400TNVYADSF
15-8-4394401NVYADSFV
15-8-5395402VYADSFVI
15-8-6396403YADSFVIR
15-8-7397404ADSFVIRG
15-8-8398405DSFVIRGD
15-9-1391399CFTNVYADS
15-9-2392400FTNVYADSF
15-9-3393401TNVYADSFV
15-9-4394402NVYADSFVI
15-9-5395403VYADSFVIR
15-9-6396404YADSFVIRG
15-9-7397405ADSFVIRGD
15-10-1391400CFTNVYADSF
15-10-2392401FTNVYADSFV
15-10-3393402TNVYADSFVI
15-10-4394403NVYADSFVIR
15-10-5395404VYADSFVIRG
15-10-6396405YADSFVIRGD
15-11-1391401CFTNVYADSFV
15-11-2392402FTNVYADSFVI
15-11-3393403TNVYADSFVIR
15-11-4394404NVYADSFVIRG
15-11-5395405VYADSFVIRGD
The peptide capable of enhancing cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity is highlighted in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Kim, E.; Lee, J.-S.; Poo, H. A Murine CD8+ T Cell Epitope Identified in the Receptor-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Vaccines 2021, 9, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060641

AMA Style

Yang J, Kim E, Lee J-S, Poo H. A Murine CD8+ T Cell Epitope Identified in the Receptor-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Vaccines. 2021; 9(6):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jihyun, Eunjin Kim, Jong-Soo Lee, and Haryoung Poo. 2021. "A Murine CD8+ T Cell Epitope Identified in the Receptor-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein" Vaccines 9, no. 6: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop