Next Article in Journal
The Reasons to Get Vaccinated: A Cross-Sectional Study on HPV Vaccination Adherence in a Northern Italian University
Previous Article in Journal
Recommendations on Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Immunization Strategies for Infants and Young Children in Countries with Year-Round RSV Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination among Eligible Adults in Abuja, Nigeria: A Mixed-Methods Study Using the WHO Behavioral and Social Drivers of Vaccination Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Vaccines in 2025: What Is New in Vaccine Advocacy?

by
Lavinia Bianco
1,2 and
Christian Napoli
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
2
National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (NIHMP), 00153 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2026, 14(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010060
Submission received: 15 December 2025 / Revised: 19 December 2025 / Accepted: 24 December 2025 / Published: 4 January 2026
The scientific literature is quite rich when it comes to vaccines and vaccination: just by looking at PubMed, using as “Vaccin* [Title/Abstract]” a search key, it is possible to obtain more than 480,000 results starting from 1799, and more than 25,288 results were published in the last year. The availability of this incredible amount of literature is due to the incredible importance of the subject, as widespread use of vaccines has led to the global eradication of smallpox and near-eradication of polio, measles, rubella and neonatal tetanus [1,2]. Moreover, research in this field is very proactive: as of 21 March 2025, the global landscape of vaccine R&D included 919 candidates identified since 2015, with a heavy focus on COVID-19, influenza, HIV, HPV, pneumococcal and RSV vaccine candidates [3].
In short, it is possible to state that vaccination has revolutionized the way in which we prevent and control infectious diseases [2], and the continuous search for both proof of their usefulness and new technologies is the main reason that this journal was launched.
As expected, vaccines received significant consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic, as the whole world paid attention to equitable access to vaccines, vaccine supply and logistics (such as information systems for tracking COVID-19 vaccination and monitoring vaccine safety), educating and empowering health-care professionals at all levels and addressing confidence in and demand for vaccines [1].
In fact, a robust immunization policy, combined with strong advocacy for vaccination, has the potential to increase the resilience of immunization programs [4]; it should always be remembered that both vaccine hesitancy and vaccine acceptance depend, among other factors, on education level and on the information provided about vaccines [5,6]. Notably, a recently published review identified and summarized the current tools available to address vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake, such as the implementation of culturally and linguistically responsive educational campaigns, using trusted messengers through community engagement, and strong provider recommendations [7]. Moreover, even considering the heightened attention given to vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no gain for the R&D groups, as no significant differences in the number of vaccine candidates were found across the different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic [3].
In other words, a simple understanding of the benefits of vaccinations for both single individuals and entire communities [2], as well as their indisputable role in reducing morbidity and death from a growing number of infectious and noncommunicable diseases [1], is insufficient if we cannot correctly and efficiently share that knowledge. Knowing, as experts in the field, that not getting vaccinated can lead to the reappearance of previously eradicated illnesses [2] and that better collaborations from academic and nonprofit sectors could aid R&D for infectious diseases vaccines [3] might not be enough to ensure the protection of our very own communities if said communities do not work with us, hence the growing attention given to community engagement.
On this topic, the literature suggests that emphasizing the concept of herd immunity in vaccination advocacy might improve vaccination acceptance [8] and that implementing measures such as school-based education programs, achieving visible leadership influence and using various media channels could be useful for accurate vaccine information dissemination [9]. Moreover, communication must be tailored: for instance, pediatricians and other clinicians who care for children must be ready to answer parents’ questions and doubts regarding vaccine licensure, vaccine safety and vaccine safety monitoring, individually identifying and addressing each parental vaccine concern [7,10], whereas general practitioners must also answer questions regarding vaccine development [11].
In conclusion, guaranteeing the correct vaccination and immunization of a community is a group effort, and evidence gathered in the last 5 years proves, once again, that effective communication strategies are necessary for addressing vaccine hesitancy [7,10,11]. To keep up with the new technologies and to assure strong advocacy for vaccination towards the general population, it is crucial to monitor this ever-growing body of evidence.

Author Contributions

L.B. and C.N. made equal contributions to this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. European Immunization Agenda 2030; Copenhagen; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cynthia, R. Vaccination and Immunization: The Importance of Vaccination. J. Neonatal Stud. 2023, 6, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Du, M.; Chen, W.; Li, G.; Liang, W.; Liu, J. Trends and disparities in the research and development of infectious disease vaccines from 2015 to 2025. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2025, 21, 2581440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vojtek, I.; van Wouw, M.; Thomson, A. Impact of COVID-19 on vaccine confidence and uptake: A systematic literature review. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2024, 20, 2384180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shirama, A.; Stickley, A.; Sumiyoshi, T. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy and Most Frequently Vaccinated Status in a Japanese Population-Based Sample. Vaccines 2024, 12, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Araújo, J.S.T.; Delpino, F.M.; de Paula Andrade-Gonçalves, R.L.; Aragão, F.B.A.; Ferezin, L.P.; Santos, D.A.; Neto, N.C.D.; do Nascimento, M.C.; Moreira, S.P.; Ribeiro, G.F.; et al. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brumbaugh, K.; Gellert, F.; Mokdad, A.H. Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights and Improvement Strategies Drawn from a Multi-Study Review. Vaccines 2025, 13, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Reiter, L.; Voracek, M.; Betsch, C.; Böhm, R. Emphasising herd immunity in vaccine advocacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 2025, 1, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Somefun, O.D.; Casale, M.; Ronnie, G.H.; Sumankuuro, J.; Akintola, O.; Desmond, C.; Cluver, L. Amplifying youth voices: Young people’s recommendations for policy and practice to enhance vaccine acceptability. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2024, 24, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. O’Leary, S.T.; Opel, D.J.; Cataldi, J.R.; Hackell, J.M.; Committee on Infectious Diseases; Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine; Committee on Bioethics. Strategies for Improving Vaccine Communication and Uptake. Pediatrics 2024, 153, e2023065483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wiedermann, C.J.; Piccoliori, G.; Engl, A. Supporting Primary Care Communication on Vaccination in Multilingual and Culturally Diverse Settings: Lessons from South Tyrol, Italy. Epidemiologia 2025, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bianco, L.; Napoli, C. Vaccines in 2025: What Is New in Vaccine Advocacy? Vaccines 2026, 14, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010060

AMA Style

Bianco L, Napoli C. Vaccines in 2025: What Is New in Vaccine Advocacy? Vaccines. 2026; 14(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bianco, Lavinia, and Christian Napoli. 2026. "Vaccines in 2025: What Is New in Vaccine Advocacy?" Vaccines 14, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010060

APA Style

Bianco, L., & Napoli, C. (2026). Vaccines in 2025: What Is New in Vaccine Advocacy? Vaccines, 14(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop