Next Article in Journal
Skin-Based Vaccination: A Systematic Mapping Review of the Types of Vaccines and Methods Used and Immunity and Protection Elicited in Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Chikungunya Virus: Priority Pathogen or Passing Trend?
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generation of a Live-Attenuated Strain of Chikungunya Virus from an Indian Isolate for Vaccine Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Developments in Vaccines against Flaviviruses and Alphaviruses

by
Young Chan Kim
1,* and
Arturo Reyes-Sandoval
1,2,*
1
The Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DG, UK
2
Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Av. Luis Enrique Erro s/n., Unidad Adolfo López Mateos, México City 07738, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 448; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020448
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
In the twenty-first century, newly emerging viruses which are mostly zoonotic or vector-borne have continuously threatened public health and caused outbreaks of global concern. This has been highlighted by the recent COVID-19 pandemic which caused a catastrophic effect on the world’s healthcare system and the global economy [1]. Flaviviruses and alphaviruses are single-stranded RNA viruses vectored by Aedes mosquitoes that can (re)-emerge unexpectedly and cause severe viral infections in humans [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These flaviviruses and alphaviruses can be classified into a broader category of arboviruses, and they cause significant disease burdens and public health concerns due to the global spread and transmission over the last century [6,7,8,9,10].
The mosquito-borne flaviviruses such as dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus (ZIKV), yellow fever virus (YFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) are responsible for significant human morbidity and mortality all over the world [7,8,11,12]. In particular, DENV is estimated to cause around 400 million infections annually and 20% of infections lead to 22,000 deaths per year with more than a quarter of the world’s population now living in DENV-endemic areas [13,14,15]. The rapid geographical introduction and spread of WNV and ZIKV from the Eastern to the Western Hemisphere had caused a large number of cases with significant morbidity [16,17]. Although most ZIKV infections are asymptomatic, some ZIKV infections are associated with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) and Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) [18,19,20]. Despite the existence of a highly effective YFV vaccine, the re-emergence of YFV throughout Africa and the Americas now poses a serious public health challenge [21,22].
The alphaviruses are a genus of enveloped RNA viruses with medically important alphaviruses such as Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), Mayaro virus (MAYV), and Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) that can cause arthralgia (CHIKV and MAYV) or neuroinvasive disease (EEEV) [5,9,10,23]. Following the first identification of CHIKV in Tanzania in 1952 and subsequently, in Africa and Asia, CHIKV outbreaks became more prevalent since 2004, and CHIKV cases are now reported in over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas [10,24,25]. For alphavirus infections, there are no specific antiviral drugs or licensed vaccines, and therefore, the current treatment is mainly symptom relief.
Despite continued threats from emerging viral diseases, the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that the twenty-first century has come with a new era in vaccinology in which recombinant genetic technologies allowed remarkably rapid development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 [26]. Over the last century, many vaccines based on classical platforms have played a major role in eradicating diseases such as polio and smallpox (Figure 1) [27,28]. However, the speed of the vaccine developments using the classical platforms is considerably slower than the next-generation platforms as these platforms are not often optimized for rapid large-scale production due to unavoidable limitations such as the requirement of biosafety level 3 conditions to grow large quantities of viruses for production of virus-inactivated vaccine and the extensive safety assessment and contraindications associated with administration of live-attenuated vaccines to immunocompromised and pregnant individuals [29,30]. On the other hand, the development of next-generation vaccines can go ahead as soon as the viral sequence becomes known and the DNA sequence of the whole or part of viral antigens with the critical epitopes can be used to develop vaccines using recombinant DNA technologies and thus significantly speeding up vaccine development [31,32]. These next-generation vaccine platforms include viral vectors, nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), and antigen-presenting cells (APC) (Figure 1) [26,30,33]. The potential of next-generation vaccine platforms was clearly shown during the COVID-19 pandemic where the fastest vaccine candidates that reached the phase I clinical trials were based on the next-generation platforms such as mRNA, DNA, human adenoviral vector, and chimpanzee adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1) [26]. In particular, the mRNA vaccine candidate had set a record time by reaching the clinical trial in only 69 days after the identification of the SARS-CoV-2 [26,34]. This pace of vaccine development was striking when compared to arboviral diseases caused by flaviviruses and alphaviruses such as DENV [35], CHIKV [25,36], and ZIKV [37,38,39] which reached trials in 52, 19, and 9 years after the declaration of major outbreaks by WHO, respectively as we discussed previously [26,37,40]. Looking on the bright side, the time taken for these vaccines to reach trials has progressively become shortened with the development of recombinant genetic technology. For instance, the first Zika vaccine candidate to reach the clinical trial in August 2016 was a DNA vaccine candidate which was 9 years after the ZIKV outbreak in Micronesia [37], 3 years after the major epidemic in French Polynesia in 2013 [41] but just 6 months after WHO declared Zika-related microcephaly as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in February 2016 [42] highlighting the advances in the modern vaccine development in urgent need [26].
This Special Issue will feature the recent development of vaccines against flaviviruses and alphaviruses. Although licensed vaccines against flaviviruses exist such as DENV (tetravalent vaccine), JEV (inactivated), tick-borne encephalitis (inactivated), and YFV (attenuated), there are currently no vaccines against WNV and ZIKV [43]. Moreover, there may be a need for next-generation vaccines to overcome potential problems with an insufficient supply of inactivated vaccines and contraindications associated with the administration of live-attenuated vaccines to immunocompromised and pregnant individuals [22,43]. Despite slow progress in vaccine development against alphaviruses, there are currently many promising vaccines in clinical trials based on both the classical and next-generation platforms which could lead to the future licensing of vaccines against these medically important emerging arboviruses.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Health through the SBRI Innovate UK grant (project Nos. 972212 and 971557) (A.R.-S.). Y.C.K. is supported by the Wellcome Trust Grant (224117/Z/21/Z).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaye, A.D.; Okeagu, C.N.; Pham, A.D.; Silva, R.A.; Hurley, J.J.; Arron, B.L.; Sarfraz, N.; Lee, H.N.; Ghali, G.E.; Gamble, J.W.; et al. Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Facilities and Systems: International Perspectives. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2021, 35, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chambers, T.J.; Hahn, C.S.; Galler, R.; Rice, C.M. Flavivirus Genome Organization, Expression, and Replication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1990, 44, 649–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chambers, T.J.; Rice, C.M. Molecular Biology of the Flaviviruses. Microbiol. Sci. 1987, 4, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Strauss, J.H.; Strauss, E.G. The Alphaviruses: Gene Expression, Replication, and Evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58, 491–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Weaver, S.C.; Winegar, R.; Manger, I.D.; Forrester, N.L. Alphaviruses: Population Genetics and Determinants of Emergence. Antiviral Res. 2012, 94, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Weaver, S.C. Urbanization and Geographic Expansion of Zoonotic Arboviral Diseases: Mechanisms and Potential Strategies for Prevention. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Weaver, S.C.; Reisen, W.K. Present and Future Arboviral Threats. Antiviral Res. 2010, 85, 328–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Weaver, S.C.; Charlier, C.; Vasilakis, N.; Lecuit, M. Zika, Chikungunya, and Other Emerging Vector-Borne Viral Diseases. Annu. Rev. Med. 2018, 69, 395–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Weaver, S.C. Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Weaver, S.C.; Lecuit, M. Chikungunya Virus and the Global Spread of a Mosquito-Borne Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pierson, T.C.; Diamond, M.S. The Continued Threat of Emerging Flaviviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 796–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Flaviviridae. Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (VHFs). CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/virus-families/flaviviridae.html (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  13. Bhatt, S.; Gething, P.W.; Brady, O.J.; Messina, J.P.; Farlow, A.W.; Moyes, C.L.; Drake, J.M.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Sankoh, O.; et al. The Global Distribution and Burden of Dengue. Nature 2013, 496, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Guzman, M.G.; Harris, E. Dengue. Lancet 2015, 385, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dengue and Severe Dengue. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  16. Pierson, T.C.; Diamond, M.S. The Emergence of Zika Virus and Its New Clinical Syndromes. Nature 2018, 560, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Roehrig, J.T. West Nile Virus in the United States—A Historical Perspective. Viruses 2013, 5, 3088–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. van der Linden, V.; Pessoa, A.; Dobyns, W.; Barkovich, A.J.; van der Linden Júnior, H.; Filho, E.L.R.; Ribeiro, E.M.; de Carvalho Leal, M.; de Araújo Coimbra, P.P.; de Fátima Viana Vasco Aragão, M.; et al. Description of 13 Infants Born During October 2015-January 2016 with Congenital Zika Virus Infection without Microcephaly at Birth—Brazil. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 65, 1343–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vhp, L.; Aragão, M.M.; Pinho, R.S.; Hazin, A.N.; Paciorkowski, A.R.; Penalva de Oliveira, A.C.; Masruha, M.R. Congenital Zika Virus Infection: A Review with Emphasis on the Spectrum of Brain Abnormalities. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2020, 20, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao-Lormeau, V.-M.; Blake, A.; Mons, S.; Lastère, S.; Roche, C.; Vanhomwegen, J.; Dub, T.; Baudouin, L.; Teissier, A.; Larre, P.; et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outbreak Associated with Zika Virus Infection in French Polynesia: A Case-Control Study. Lancet 2016, 387, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Faria, N.R.; Kraemer, M.U.G.; Hill, S.C.; Goes de Jesus, J.; Aguiar, R.S.; Iani, F.C.M.; Xavier, J.; Quick, J.; du Plessis, L.; Dellicour, S.; et al. Genomic and Epidemiological Monitoring of Yellow Fever Virus Transmission Potential. Science 2018, 361, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Montalvo Zurbia-Flores, G.; Rollier, C.S.; Reyes-Sandoval, A. Re-Thinking Yellow Fever Vaccines: Fighting Old Foes with New Generation Vaccines. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2022, 18, 1895644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Virus. Chikungunya Virus. CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/virus/index.html (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  24. Staples, J.E.; Breiman, R.F.; Powers, A.M. Chikungunya Fever: An Epidemiological Review of a Re-Emerging Infectious Disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sergon, K.; Njuguna, C.; Kalani, R.; Ofula, V.; Onyango, C.; Konongoi, L.S.; Bedno, S.; Burke, H.; Dumilla, A.M.; Konde, J.; et al. Seroprevalence of Chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Infection on Lamu Island, Kenya, October 2004. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 78, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, Y.C.; Dema, B.; Reyes-Sandoval, A. COVID-19 Vaccines: Breaking Record Times to First-in-Human Trials. NPJ Vaccines 2020, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bandyopadhyay, A.S.; Garon, J.; Seib, K.; Orenstein, W.A. Polio Vaccination: Past, Present and Future. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Stewart, A.J.; Devlin, P.M. The History of the Smallpox Vaccine. J. Infect. 2006, 52, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeyanathan, M.; Afkhami, S.; Smaill, F.; Miller, M.S.; Lichty, B.D.; Xing, Z. Immunological Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccine Strategies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 615–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. van Riel, D.; de Wit, E. Next-Generation Vaccine Platforms for COVID-19. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 810–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deering, R.P.; Kommareddy, S.; Ulmer, J.B.; Brito, L.A.; Geall, A.J. Nucleic Acid Vaccines: Prospects for Non-Viral Delivery of MRNA Vaccines. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2014, 11, 885–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Geall, A.J.; Mandl, C.W.; Ulmer, J.B. RNA: The New Revolution in Nucleic Acid Vaccines. Semin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, Y.C.; Reyes-Sandoval, A. Chapter 7—Viral-Vectored Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. In Biomedical Innovations to Combat COVID-19; Rosales-Mendoza, S., Comas-Garcia, M., Gonzalez-Ortega, O., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 115–127. ISBN 978-0-323-90248-9. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A Novel Coronavirus Outbreak of Global Health Concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ashburn, P.M.; Craig, C.F.; Ashburn, P.M. Commentary: Ashburn, P.M., Craig, C.F. Experimental Investigations Regarding the Etiology of Dengue. J. Infect. Dis. 1907, 4, 440–475. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 1747–1783, discussion 1744–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ross, R.W. The Newala Epidemic. III. The Virus: Isolation, Pathogenic Properties and Relationship to the Epidemic. J. Hyg. 1956, 54, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Duffy, M.R.; Chen, T.-H.; Hancock, W.T.; Powers, A.M.; Kool, J.L.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Pretrick, M.; Marfel, M.; Holzbauer, S.; Dubray, C.; et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2536–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dick, G.W.A.; Kitchen, S.F.; Haddow, A.J. Zika Virus. I. Isolations and Serological Specificity. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1952, 46, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dick, G.W.A. Zika Virus. II. Pathogenicity and Physical Properties. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1952, 46, 521–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Harrison, V.R.; Eckels, K.H.; Bartelloni, P.J.; Hampton, C. Production and Evaluation of a Formalin-Killed Chikungunya Vaccine. J. Immunol. 1971, 107, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cao-Lormeau, V.-M.; Roche, C.; Teissier, A.; Robin, E.; Berry, A.-L.; Mallet, H.-P.; Sall, A.A.; Musso, D. Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1085–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gulland, A. Zika Virus Is a Global Public Health Emergency, Declares WHO. BMJ 2016, 352, i657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. FDA Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states (accessed on 25 January 2023).
Figure 1. A schematic showing the classical vaccine platforms and next-generation platforms. The classical platforms include whole-inactivated, live attenuated, protein subunit, and virus-like particles (VLPs). The next-generation platforms include recombinant viral vectors, nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), and antigen-presenting cells (APC). Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. A schematic showing the classical vaccine platforms and next-generation platforms. The classical platforms include whole-inactivated, live attenuated, protein subunit, and virus-like particles (VLPs). The next-generation platforms include recombinant viral vectors, nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), and antigen-presenting cells (APC). Created with BioRender.com.
Vaccines 11 00448 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.C.; Reyes-Sandoval, A. Recent Developments in Vaccines against Flaviviruses and Alphaviruses. Vaccines 2023, 11, 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020448

AMA Style

Kim YC, Reyes-Sandoval A. Recent Developments in Vaccines against Flaviviruses and Alphaviruses. Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):448. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Young Chan, and Arturo Reyes-Sandoval. 2023. "Recent Developments in Vaccines against Flaviviruses and Alphaviruses" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop