Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effects of Negative Attitudes towards Vaccination in General and Trust in Government on Uptake of a Booster Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine and the Moderating Role of Psychological Reactance: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study in Hong Kong
Previous Article in Journal
Influenza Virus Carrying a Codon-Reprogrammed Neuraminidase Gene as a Strategy for Live Attenuated Vaccine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/vaccines11020392
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey

by
Paul Shing-fong Chan
1,†,
Marco Lok-tin Lee
1,†,
Yuan Fang
2,
Fuk-yuen Yu
1,
Danhua Ye
1,
Siyu Chen
1,
Joseph Kawuki
1,
Xue Liang
1 and
Zixin Wang
1,*
1
Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
Department of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 392; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020392
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Vaccination and Globe Public Health)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose is effective and safe for older adults. This study investigated hesitancy to take up a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose and its determinants among older adults in Hong Kong. Participants were Chinese-speaking community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or above. Telephone numbers were randomly selected from up-to-date telephone directories. A total of 370 participants completed the telephone survey. Logistic regression models were fitted for data analysis. Among the participants, half (52.4%) were hesitant to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. After adjustment for significant background characteristics, perceived benefits (AOR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.60), cues to action (AOR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.30, 0.52), and perceived self-efficacy (AOR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.66) of receiving the second booster dose were associated with lower vaccine hesitancy. Perceived barriers (AOR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.12, 1.34) and vaccine fatigue (tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination) (AOR: 1.90, 95%CI: 1.52, 2.38) were associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. Level of hesitancy to receive the second booster dose was high among older adults in Hong Kong. Health authorities should address vaccine fatigue and modify perceptions related to the second booster dose.

1. Introduction

Globally, the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a severe public health issue. As of 12 December 2022, there have been 646 million confirmed cases and 6.6 million deaths caused by COVID-19 worldwide [1]. Increasing age is a leading risk factor of severe COVID-19 cases and mortality [2]. In Hong Kong, where this study was conducted, the cumulative number of COVID-19 associated deaths was 11,131 on 16 December 2022, and over 90% of them were individuals aged 60 years or above [3]. The majority (72.5%) of the COVID-19 associated deaths among older adults in Hong Kong occurred among those who had never received any COVID-19 vaccines [3].
COVID-19 vaccination is one of the most cost-effective measures to control the pandemic. It is proven to be effective and safe in preventing deaths and other severe consequences caused by COVID-19 among older adults [4,5,6]. However, there are concerns about waning protection against COVID-19 after completing the two-dose primary vaccination series [7,8]. The waning of protection is even faster in older adults [9,10]. Administering an additional booster dose of vaccine is proven to restore immune response against COVID-19 and successfully decrease the rate of infection and hospitalization [8,11]. However, waning immunity to the first booster dose and evolving highly contagious new variants of SARS-CoV-2 have led to the consensus recommendation of prioritizing high-risk groups, such as older adults, for a second booster dose [8,11,12].
A second booster dose could help increase protection levels, especially for individuals in high-risk groups, such as older adults. Numerous studies demonstrated that a second booster dose was effective in reducing the risk of COVID-19-related outcomes (including those caused by the new variants, Delta and Omicron), such as polymerase chain reaction-confirmed infection, symptomatic infection, severe illness, hospitalization, emergency department and urgent care counters and deaths [13,14,15,16,17,18]. A prospective observational trial showed that 65% of subjects reported no side effects after receiving the second booster dose [19]. The most frequently reported adverse reactions included fatigue, headache, and muscle pain, and these mild adverse reactions resolved within three days [19]. Moreover, according to a safety monitoring report from the United States, the administration of a second booster dose did not result in any unexpected safety signals, and 95% of the adverse events reported to the surveillance system were non-serious [20].
Based on the vaccine effectiveness and safety of receiving the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, on 18 August 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a practice statement and recommended countries consider a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose in the populations at risk, including older people [21]. Health authorities from different countries also endorsed the second booster dose for older adults, with the age eligibility threshold slightly different across countries, commonly starting from 50 or 60 years old [22,23,24,25,26]. In April 2022, the Hong Kong government started providing the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose to people aged 60 years or above [27]. The age threshold was further lowered to 50 years old in August 2022, and then expanded to all adults [28]. People can choose either the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, or the Sinovac-CoronaVac inactivated vaccine as a second booster dose.
Despite the promising evidence of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety, vaccine hesitancy is still a significant threat to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. Previous studies showed that older adults were less willing to receive the primary COVID-19 vaccination series and first booster dose than the younger groups in China [29,30,31,32]. The studies identified some factors associated with hesitancy to complete the primary vaccination series or first booster dose among older adults. The barriers included the belief that they were ineligible for vaccination due to certain illnesses, concerns about vaccine safety and adverse side effects, concerns about efficacy, limitation on movements, and low level of perceived benefit [29,30,31,32]. In contrast, being male, having higher education level, and high level of perceived susceptibility were found to be facilitators [29,30,31,32]. Two studies from Greece investigated vaccine hesitancy on the second booster dose in nurses and the general population [33,34]. However, no study has investigated the hesitancy to receive the second booster dose and its associated factors among older adults.
Vaccine fatigue refers to people’s inaction toward vaccine instructions due to perceived burden and burnout [35]. The need for COVID-19 vaccine booster doses and the rapidly changing recommendations and guidelines may increase vaccine fatigue, thus increasing vaccine hesitancy. In Pakistan, 83.3% of COVID-19 vaccination recipients had vaccine fatigue after the primary vaccination series [36]. The present study also investigated the association between vaccine fatigue and hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose among older adults.
COVID-19 vaccinations and booster doses are hot topics on different media. Exposure to information related to COVID-19 vaccination influenced people’s decision to take up such vaccines. The general population in China with a higher frequency of exposure to positive information supporting COVID-19 vaccination were more likely to complete the primary vaccination series [37]. It is possible that such exposure would have a similar effect on the willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine booster doses among older adults. Thoughtful consideration of the veracity of the exposed information was also significantly associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination uptake among the general population and ethnic minorities in China [37,38]. Such practice may mitigate the negative impact of misinformation related to COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, the present study also examined the association between vaccine hesitancy and exposure to information about COVID-19 vaccine booster doses through social media.
It is essential to understand vaccine hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 booster dose and its associated factors among older adults in order to design effective health promotion strategies. However, there is a dearth of studies investigating the hesitancy to receive the second booster dose among older adults. To address the knowledge gaps, this study investigated the vaccine hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose among older adults in Hong Kong, China. In addition, we examined the factors associated with the vaccine hesitancy to receive the second booster dose.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We conducted a random telephone survey among community-dwelling Chinese-speaking adults aged 65 years or above in Hong Kong between 11 May 2022 and 11 July 2022. The number of local daily-confirmed COVID-19 cases was 254 on 11 May 2022 and slowly increased to 2558 on 11 July 2022. The COVID-19 situation in Hong Kong during the study period is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.2. Participants and Data Collection

The inclusion criteria of the participants were: (1) community-dwelling Chinese-speaking individuals aged 65 years or above, and (2) having a Hong Kong ID card. Those who were not able to communicate effectively with the study interviewers were excluded.
Simple random sampling was used. All the household telephone numbers (about 350,000) listed on the up-to-date telephone directories in Hong Kong were inputted into an Excel sheet. Using the random selection function in the software, about 4000 telephone numbers were randomly selected. Experienced interviewers conducted the telephone interview during 6:00–10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 2:00–9:00 p.m. on Saturdays to prevent under-sampling of individuals who worked on weekdays. Each number was called up to 5 times at different timeslots. Households were regarded as “non-valid” (i.e., absence of an eligible participant) if no one answered the call after five times of calling. To avoid clustering effects, if there was more than one individual in a household aged 65 or more, the one with a birthday closest to the survey date was invited to join the study. Interviewers screened the eligibility of prospective participants and provided a study briefing to participants. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants. Prior to the interview, the interviewers used a checklist to confirm that the participant was fully informed about the study. There were six parts on the checklist: (1) questions to confirm eligibility, (2) scrips about study information, (3) the interviewers confirming they had introduced the research purpose, research process, main content of the survey, time required for completing the survey, rights of the participant, that non-participation would not affect the use of any services, and confidentiality of the research data, (4) the interviewers confirming that the participant fully understood the above contents, (5) the interviewers confirming that the participant verbally expressed his/her willingness to participate in the study, and (6) signature of the interviewers. No incentive was offered for study participation. The whole survey took around 20 min to complete. The same data collection method was used in a number of published studies [39,40,41,42]. We called 3840 households, 625 households had an eligible participant, 255 refused to participate in the study, and 370 completed the telephone survey. The response rate was 59%. Ethics approval was obtained from the Survey and Behavioral Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (SBRE-19-187).

2.3. Measures

2.3.1. Design of the Questionnaire

A panel of researchers in public health, behavioral health, and vaccination behaviors was formed to design the questionnaire used in this study. The questionnaire was pilot tested among 10 older adults to assess clarity and readability. All the older adults participating in the pilot study indicated that the items of the questionnaire were easy to understand and the length of the questionnaire was acceptable. These older adults did not participate in the actual survey. The panel finalized the questionnaire based on their comments.

2.3.2. Background Characteristics

Information on socioeconomic characteristics was collected, such as gender, age, educational level, relationship status, employment status, household income level, whether living alone, and whether they were receiving Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA). Participants also reported their current health condition and history of seasonal influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, and COVID-19 infection.

2.3.3. COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake and Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose

Information on the vaccination status of the participants, including the number of vaccine doses, the timing and type(s) of vaccine received and any side effects after vaccination, was collected. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using the same definition as in published studies [43,44]. It was assessed by first asking the participants, “Have you received the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (the fourth dose)?”. If they answered “no”, they were further asked the following question, “How likely is it that you will receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (the fourth dose) in the future 6 months?”. Answer options were on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = very unlikely, 2 = unlikely, 3 = neutral, 4 = likely, and 5 = very likely. People who responded ‘very unlikely’, ‘unlikely’, or ‘neutral’ were defined as having vaccine hesitancy.

2.3.4. Perceptions Related to COVID-19, Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose and Vaccine Fatigue

Regarding perceptions about COVID-19, we added one new item “How high is your chance of having close contact with people having COVID-19?” to a validated item measuring perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 [36,38], and formed the Perceived Susceptibility Scale. The Cronbach’s alpha of the Perceived Susceptibility Scale was 0.63. The Perceived Severity Scale was constructed for this study by summing up three items measuring perceived consequences of COVID-19 infection (i.e., chance of having severe illness, negatively affecting income and health of other family members) (response categories: 1 = low, 2 = neutral, 3 = high). The Cronbach’s alpha of the Perceived Severity Scale was 0.70. We adapted the validated scales or items to measure perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and perceived self-efficacy related to the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose [39]. The phrase “COVID-19 vaccine booster dose” in the original measurements was replaced by “second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose” in this study [39].
One single item was constructed to measure vaccine fatigue (i.e., you are tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination). The response categories for the above items were 1 = disagree, 2 = neutral, 3 = agree.

2.3.5. Interpersonal Level Variables

Validated items were adapted to measure the frequency of exposure to the following contents on TV, radio, newspaper, and Internet: (1) people infected with COVID-19 after receiving three doses of COVID-19 vaccines, and (2) people recovered from COVID-19 without seeking medical consultation [37]. We used a validated measurement to measure thoughtful consideration about the veracity of COVID-19-specific information [45].

2.4. Sample Size Planning

The targeted sample size of this study was 360. We assumed 50% of the elderly population intended to receive a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. With the assumption of the prevalence of behavioral intention in the reference group (without a facilitating condition) to be 10–40%, this targeted sample size could be able to detect the smallest odds of 1.76 between individuals with or without a facilitating condition (Power: 0.80, alpha value: 0.05; PASS 11.0, NCSS LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA). The same sample size planning approach was used in published studies [41].

2.5. Statistical Analyses

We followed the statistical methods used in a number of published studies [40,41,46]. The frequency distribution of all variables was established. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the items and scales representing perceptions related to the second COVID-19 booster dose were also calculated. Univariate logistic regression models first assessed the significance of associations between background characteristics and the dependent variable (i.e., vaccine hesitancy). We then fitted a single logistic regression model involving all significant background characteristics and one independent variable of interest at a time. Crude odds ratio (OR), adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Background Characteristics of the Participants

About half of the participants were 65–69 years (49.2%) and female (60.8%). The majority of them were married or cohabited with a partner (74.6%), did not receive tertiary education (89.2%), were without a full-time or part-time job (86.2%), and had a monthly household income below HKD 20,000 (USD 2580) (73.8%). Over half had at least one chronic condition (60.3%). The most prevalent chronic condition was hypertension (46.8%), followed by diabetes mellitus (18.9%) and chronic cardiovascular diseases (10.8%). Among the participants, 25.4% reported a history of COVID-19 infection. At the survey time, 66.2% had received a seasonal influenza vaccination and 28.6% had received pneumococcal vaccination in their lifetime (Table 1).

3.2. Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose Uptake and Vaccine Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose

Among the participants, 3.5% (n = 13) received a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. More participants chose Comirnaty (n = 8, 61.5%) rather than CoronaVac (n = 5, 38.5%) as their second booster dose. The majority reported no side effects (46.2%), and the side effects were very mild or mild (46.2%) with the second booster dose. The prevalence of hesitancy to receive the second booster dose was 52.4% (Table 2).

3.3. Perceptions Related to COVID-19 and the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose

For perceived susceptibility, 3.8% and 24.0% of the participants perceived the chance of COVID-19 infection and having another wave of COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong was high/very high, respectively. For perceived severity, 21.1%, 10.5%, and 33.0% perceived the chance of having severe illness, financial difficulties caused by COVID-19, and transmitting COVID-19 to family members was high/very high, respectively (Table 2).
Regarding perceptions related to the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, the majority had positive attitudes toward the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, such as the belief that a second booster dose was highly effective in preventing severe consequences of COVID-19 (73.8%), could maintain their antibody level and strengthen the protection against COVID-19 (59.2%), and was highly effective in protecting them from the Omicron variant (47.8%). About 34.1% and 20.0% were concerned that the presence of chronic diseases would decrease the protection of the second booster dose and that the duration of protection offered by the second booster dose was shorter among people with older age, respectively. About a quarter (27.0%) reported that their family doctors would suggest them to receive the second booster dose and less than half (43.8%) reported that their family members would suggest them to receive the second booster dose. The majority (86.8%) were confident to receive the second booster dose. However, over half (54.3%) reported that they were tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination (vaccine fatigue) (Table 2).

3.4. Factors Associated with Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose

Females had a higher level of hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose than males (AOR: 1.92, 95%CI: 1.26, 2.94) (Table 3). After adjustment for gender, those with more perceived barriers to receive the second booster dose (AOR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.12, 1.34) and who were tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccinati (vaccine fatigue) (AOR: 1.90, 95%CI: 1.52, 2.38) were more likely to have a hesitancy to receive the second booster dose. Perceived benefits of the second booster dose (AOR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.60), cues to action (AOR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.30, 0.52), and higher self-efficacy (AOR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.66) were associated with lower hesitancy to receive the second booster dose (Table 4).
Key findings of the study:
  • Half of the participants (52.4%) were hesitant to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.
  • Perceived benefits, cues to action, and perceived self-efficacy of receiving the second booster dose were associated with lower vaccine hesitancy.
  • Perceived barriers and vaccine fatigue (tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination) were associated with higher vaccine hesitancy.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to examine the hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose and its associated factors among older adults in China. Factors at the individual level were determinants of hesitancy to receive the second booster dose. The findings provided a knowledge basis to develop tailored behavioral interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy to receive the second booster dose among older adults.
In this study, the socioeconomic and educational status of the study populations were similar to the general population aged 65 years or above reported by the Hong Kong government [47,48,49]. Half of the older adults (52.4%) were hesitant to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. Older adults were the most vulnerable age group during the COVID-19 pandemic [2]. Given the promising effectiveness of the second booster dose in preventing severe consequences and deaths associated with COVID-19, there is a strong need to decrease the vaccine hesitancy to receive the second booster dose among older adults in Hong Kong. This hesitancy rate was much higher than that of the first booster dose found in China (17.2–18.3%) [30,32] and the second booster dose among the general population in Greece (38.1%) [33]. One of the reasons for this high vaccine hesitancy may be due to vaccine fatigue. In our findings, over half (54.3%) of the older adults agreed that they were tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination. During the pandemic, policies and recommendations related to COVID-19 vaccination have been changing rapidly. Such changes might confuse the general public. In the United States, many people were confused about the meaning of “fully-vaccinated” when booster doses became part of the vaccination regimen [35]. Such confusion further increased when health authorities recommended the second booster dose. It is possible that many older adults in Hong Kong would have similar confusion. The confusion increases vaccine fatigue and results in a higher hesitancy to receive a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. In order to address vaccine fatigue, greater investment in vaccine technologies is needed to make more user-friendly vaccines available with better overall efficacy, longer duration of protection, and simpler logistics associated with dose administration. On the other hand, health authorities may convey the message that taking booster doses is to maintain their protection level against COVID-19, which is similar to taking up influenza vaccination every year.
The findings provided some empirical insights for developing interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy of receiving the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. The majority of participants perceived some benefits of receiving the second COVID-19 booster dose, notably that it was highly effective in preventing severe consequences of COVID-19 (73.8%) and it could maintain their antibody level and strengthen the protection against COVID-19 (59.2%). Those who scored higher in perceived benefit were less hesitant to receive the second booster dose. Future health promotion campaigns should strengthen such beliefs among older adults. About one-third of participants (34.1%) had concerns about the presence of chronic diseases that would decrease the protection of the second booster dose. One-fifth of the participants (20.0%) had concerns about the shorter duration of protection offered by the second booster dose among older adults. It is important to address such concerns among older adults as they were significantly associated with higher hesitancy to receive the second booster dose. Health promotions should clearly convey a message to the older adults that receiving the second booster dose could protect people with chronic diseases and there is no significant difference between the duration of protection for older adults and younger adults. Perceived cue to action and self-efficacy were both facilitators. Future programs should encourage significant others, such as family doctors and members, to give reminders to receive the second booster dose as a strong cue to action. To increase self-efficacy, creating a promotional video including a role model (i.e., older adults) demonstrating the specific procedures to take up the second booster dose and facilitating them to form an action plan are potentially useful strategies.
This study had several limitations. First, selection bias existed due to non-response. The refusals might have different characteristics compared to the participants and we were not able to know how non-response would affect the results. However, our response rate was comparable to random telephone surveys on vaccination behaviors among community-dwelling older adults of previous studies [40,41,42]. Second, data were self-reported, and verification was not feasible. Social desirability bias and recall bias existed. Third, it was possible that community-dwelling older adults would perceive a stronger need to receive a second booster dose due to the increase in daily-confirmed COVID-19 cases from the start of the study (11 May 2022) to the end of the study (11 July 2022). Fourth, causal relationships could not be established, as our study design was a cross-sectional study. Finally, this study was conducted in one Chinese city and did not include older residents in residential care homes. The participants could not represent all older adults in China. Therefore, the generalization of the results to other parts of China should be made with caution.

5. Conclusions

Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or above in Hong Kong reported a high level of vaccine hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. Health authorities should address vaccine fatigue and concerns about the interaction between the presence of chronic diseases and the second booster dose. Strengthening perceived benefits, involving significant others of older adults, and increasing perceived self-efficacy to receive the second booster dose might also be useful strategies in this age group.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.S.-f.C., M.L.-t.L., Y.F. and Z.W.; methodology: Z.W.; data curation: F.-y.Y. and D.Y.; formal analysis: Y.F. and Z.W.; project administration: F.-y.Y. and D.Y.; writing—original draft preparation: P.S.-f.C., M.L.-t.L., Y.F., S.C., J.K., X.L. and Z.W.; writing—review and editing: P.S.-f.C., M.L.-t.L., Y.F., S.C., J.K., X.L. and Z.W.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Project Ref: 19181152).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethics approval was obtained from the Survey and Behavioral Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (SBRE-19-187).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The data are not publicly available as they contain personal behaviours.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all subjects for their engagement in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 19 January 2023).
  2. Kang, S.-J.; Jung, S.I. Age-Related Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with COVID-19. Infect. Chemother. 2020, 52, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Government of Hong Kong SAR. Latest Situation of Novel Coronavirus Infection in Hong Kong. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/local_situation_covid19_tc.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  4. Bernal, J.L.; Andrews, N.; Gower, C.; Robertson, C.; Stowe, J.; Tessier, E.; Simmons, R.; Cottrell, S.; Roberts, R.; O’Doherty, M.; et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on COVID-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: Test negative case-control study. BMJ-Br. Med. J. 2021, 373, n1088. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hyams, C.; Marlow, R.; Maseko, Z.; King, J.; Ward, L.; Fox, K.; Heath, R.; Tuner, A.; Friedrich, Z.; Morrison, L.; et al. Effec-tiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccination at preventing hospitalisations in people aged at least 80 years: A test-negative, case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021, 21, 1539–1548. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mazagatos, C.; Monge, S.; Olmedo, C.; Vega, L.; Gallego, P.; Martin-Merino, E.; Sierra, M.J.; Limia, A.; Larrauri, A. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths in elderly long-term care facility residents, Spain, weeks 53 2020 to 13 2021. Eurosurveillance 2021, 26, 2100452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Feikin, D.; Higdon, M.M.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Andrews, N.; Araos, R.; Goldberg, Y.; Groome, M.; Huppert, A.; O’Brien, K.; Smith, P.G.; et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: Results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 2022, 399, 924–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Menni, C.; May, A.; Polidori, L.; Louca, P.; Wolf, J.; Capdevila, J.; Hu, C.; Ourselin, S.; Steves, C.J.; Valdes, A.M.; et al. COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: A prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Andrews, N.; Tessier, E.; Stowe, J.; Gower, C.; Kirsebom, F.; Simmons, R.; Gallagher, E.; Thelwall, S.; Groves, N.; Dabrera, G.; et al. Duration of Protection against Mild and Severe Disease by COVID-19 Vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Levin, E.G.; Lustig, Y.; Cohen, C.; Fluss, R.; Indenbaum, V.; Amit, S.; Doolman, R.; Asraf, K.; Mendelson, E.; Ziv, A.; et al. Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine over 6 Months. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patalon, T.; Gazit, S.; Pitzer, V.E.; Prunas, O.; Warren, J.L.; Weinberger, D.M. Odds of Testing Positive for SARS-CoV-2 Following Receipt of 3 vs 2 Doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine. JAMA Intern. Med. 2022, 182, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jantarabenjakul, W.; Sodsai, P.; Chantasrisawad, N.; Jitsatja, A.; Ninwattana, S.; Thippamom, N.; Ruenjaiman, V.; Tan, C.W.; Pradit, R.; Sophonphan, V.; et al. Dynamics of Neutralizing Antibody and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 and Variants of Concern after Primary Immunization with CoronaVac and Booster with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 in Health Care Workers. Vaccines 2022, 10, 639. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grewal, R.; Kitchen, S.A.; Nguyen, L.; Buchan, S.A.; Wilson, S.E.; Costa, A.P.; Kwong, J.C. Effectiveness of a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine against the omicron variant among long term care residents in Ontario, Canada: Test negative design study. BMJ 2022, 378, e071502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bar-On, Y.M.; Goldberg, Y.; Mandel, M.; Bodenheimer, O.; Amir, O.; Freedman, L.; Alroy-Preis, S.; Ash, N.; Huppert, A.; Milo, R. Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1712–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arbel, R.; Sergienko, R.; Friger, M.; Peretz, A.; Beckenstein, T.; Yaron, S.; Netzer, D.; Hammerman, A. Effectiveness of a second BNT162b2 booster vaccine against hospitalization and death from COVID-19 in adults aged over 60 years. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 1486–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gazit, S.; Saciuk, Y.; Perez, G.; Peretz, A.; Pitzer, V.; Patalon, T. Short Term, Relative Effectiveness of Four Doses Compared to Three Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel. BMJ 2022, 377, e071113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Link-Gelles, R.; Levy, M.E.; Gaglani, M.; Irving, S.A.; Stockwell, M.; Dascomb, K.; DeSilva, M.B.; Reese, S.E.; Liao, I.C.; Ong, Y.C.; et al. Effectiveness of 2, 3, and 4 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Doses among Immunocompetent Adults during Periods when SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 Sublineages Predominated—VISION Network, 10 States, December 2021–June 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 931–939. [Google Scholar]
  18. Magen, O.; Waxman, J.G.; Makov-Assif, M.; Vered, R.; Dicker, D.; Hernán, M.A.; Lipsitch, M.; Reis, B.Y.; Balicer, R.D.; Dagan, N. Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1603–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yechezkel, M.; Mofaz, M.; Painsky, A.; Patalon, T.; Gazit, S.; Shmueli, E.; Yamin, D. Safety of the fourth COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA (second booster) vaccine: A prospective and retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2022, 11, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hause, A.M.; Baggs, J.; Marquez, P.; Abara, W.E.; Baumblatt, J.; Blanc, P.G.; Su, J.R.; Hugueley, B.; Parker, C.; Myers, T.R.; et al. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Second Booster Doses among Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years—United States, March 29, 2022–July 10, 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 971–976. [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organisation. Good Practice Statement on the Use of Second Booster Doses for COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE-good-practice-statement-second-booster (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Strengthens Recommendations and Expands Eligibility for COVID-19 Booster Shots. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0519-covid-booster-acip.html (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  23. Department of Health and Aged Care. Clinical Recommendations for COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/advice-for-providers/clinical-guidance/clinical-recommendations (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  24. European Medicines Agency. ECDC and EMA Update Recommendations on Additional Booster Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ecdc-ema-update-recommendations-additional-booster-doses-mrna-covid-19-vaccines (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  25. Public Health Agencies of Canada. An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI): Initial Guidance on a Second Booster Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines in Canada. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/immunization/national-advisory-committee-on-immunization-naci/naci-guidance-second-booster-dose-covid-19-vaccines.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  26. Singapore Ministry of Health. FAQs—Booster Doses. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sg/covid-19/vaccination/faqs-on-getting-vaccinated#secondbooster (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  27. The Government of Hong Kong SAR. Fourth Dose COVID-19 Vaccination Arrangements for Persons Aged 60 or Above. Available online: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202204/08/P2022040800458.htm (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  28. The Government of Hong Kong SAR. COVID-19 Vaccination Arrangements for Children Aged Six Months or Above and for Persons Aged from 50 to 59 Receiving Fourth Dose. Available online: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202208/02/P2022080200699.htm (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  29. Miao, Y.D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.L.; Wu, J.; Gu, J.Q.; Wang, M.Y.; Wei, W.; Ye, B.Z.; Miao, C.Y.; Tarimo, C.S.; et al. The Psychological Experience of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Impact on the Willingness to Receive Booster Vaccines among the Chinese Population: Evidence from a National Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5464. [Google Scholar]
  30. Qin, C.; Yan, W.; Tao, L.; Liu, M.; Liu, J. The Association between Risk Perception and Hesitancy toward the Booster Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine among People Aged 60 Years and Older in China. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lai, X.; Zhu, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Jing, R.; Lyu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Feng, H.; Guo, J.; Fang, H. Public Perceptions and Acceptance of COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Qin, C.Y.; Wang, R.T.; Tao, L.Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, J. Acceptance of a Third Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine and Associated Factors in China Based on Health Belief Model: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines 2022, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Galanis, P.; Vraka, I.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Siskou, O.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Katsoulas, T.; Mariolis-Sapsakos, T.; Kaitelidou, D. Predictors of Willingness of the General Public to Receive a Second COVID-19 Booster Dose or a New COVID-19 Vaccine: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Galanis, P.; Vraka, I.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Siskou, O.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Katsoulas, T.; Mariolis-Sapsakos, T.; Kaitelidou, D. Predictors of second COVID-19 booster dose or new COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Nurs. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, Z.H.; Cheshmehzangi, A.L.; McDonnell, D.; da Veiga, C.P.; Xiang, Y.T. Mind the “Vaccine Fatigue”. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 904971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abbas, S.; Abbas, B.; Amir, S.; Wajahat, M. Evaluation of adverse effects with COVID-19 vaccination in Pakistan. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 37, 1959–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, K.C.; Fang, Y.; Cao, H.; Chen, H.; Hu, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z. Behavioral Intention to Receive a COVID-19 Vaccination among Chinese Factory Workers: Cross-sectional Online Survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e24673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, A.; Lai, A.H.Y.; Wang, J.; Asim, S.; Chan, P.S.-F.; Wang, Z.; Yeoh, E.K. Multilevel Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among South Asian Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021, 7, e31707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Z.; Fang, Y.; Yu, F.-Y.; Chan, P.S.-F.; Chen, S.; Sun, F. Facilitators and Barriers to Take up a COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Population-Based Random Telephone Survey. Vaccines 2022, 10, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Z.X.; Fang, Y.; Dong, W.; Lau, M.; Mo, P.K.H. Illness representations on pneumonia and pneumococcal vaccination uptake among community-living Chinese people with high-risk conditions aged ≥65 years—A population-based study. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2021, 17, 1455–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Fang, Y.; Yu, F.-Y.; Chan, P.S.-F.; Chen, S. Governmental Incentives, Satisfaction with Health Promotional Materials, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey. Vaccines 2022, 10, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, Z.X.; Fang, Y.; Ip, M.; Lau, M.; Lau, J.T.F. Facilitators and barriers to completing recommended doses of pneu-mococcal vaccination among community-living individuals aged ≥65 years in Hong Kong—A population-based study. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2021, 17, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xiao, J.; Cheung, J.K.; Wu, P.; Ni, M.Y.; Cowling, B.J.; Liao, Q. Temporal changes in factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among adults in Hong Kong: Serial cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Reg. Health 2022, 23, 100441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, K.; Chen, S.; Chan, P.S.-F.; Fang, Y.; Cao, H.; Chen, H.; Hu, T.; Chen, Y.; et al. Changes in Parents’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy for Children Aged 3–17 Years before and after the Rollout of the National Childhood COVID-19 Vaccination Program in China: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pan, Y.; Xin, M.; Zhang, C.; Dong, W.; Fang, Y.; Wu, W.; Li, M.; Pang, J.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Z.; et al. Associations of Mental Health and Personal Preventive Measure Compliance with Exposure to COVID-19 Information during Work Resumption Following the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e22596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Z.; Fang, Y.; Chan, P.S.-F.; Yu, F.Y.; Sun, F. The Changes in Levels and Barriers of Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults during and after the Fifth Wave of COVID-19 Outbreak in Hong Kong: Repeated Random Telephone Surveys. JMIR Aging 2023, 6, e42223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hong Kong SAR Government. Elderly Employment Status. Available online: https://www.hkeconomy.gov.hk/tc/pdf/el/el-2019-10c.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2023).
  48. Society for Community Organization. Various Protections for Working Elders and Retirement Intentions Research. Available online: https://soco.org.hk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Study-on-the-Protection-and-Retirement-Intentions-of-the-Working-Grassroots-Elderly-1-MAY-2022.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2023).
  49. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. Population By-Census: Thematic Report: Older Persons. Available online: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11201052016XXXXB0100.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2023).
Vaccines 11 00392 g001 550
Figure 1. The COVID-19 situation in Hong Kong during the study period.
Figure 1. The COVID-19 situation in Hong Kong during the study period.
Vaccines 11 00392 g001
Table
Table 1. Background characteristics of the participants.
Table 1. Background characteristics of the participants.
CharacteristicsN%
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, years
65–6918249.2
70–7412533.8
75 or above 6317.0
Gender
Male14539.2
Female22560.8
Relationship status
Currently single9425.4
Married or cohabited with a partner27674.6
Education level
Primary or below15742.4
Secondary17346.8
Tertiary or above 4010.8
Current employment status
Unemployed/retired/housewife31986.2
Full-time/part-time5113.8
Monthly household income, HK$ (US$)
<20,000 (2580)27373.8
20,000 (2580) or above 4913.2
Refuse to disclose4813.0
Receiving Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA)
No19753.2
Yes17346.8
Living alone
No30482.2
Yes6617.8
Health conditions
Presence of chronic conditions, yes
Hypertension17346.8
Chronic cardiovascular diseases4010.8
Chronic lung diseases61.6
Chronic liver diseases82.2
Chronic kidney diseases20.5
Diabetes Mellitus7018.9
Any of the above 22360.3
History of COVID-19 infection
No27674.6
Yes9425.4
History of seasonal influenza vaccination
No12533.8
Yes24566.2
History of pneumococcal vaccination
No26471.4
Yes10628.6
Table
Table 2. Hesitancy and attitudes toward the second COVID-19 booster dose.
Table 2. Hesitancy and attitudes toward the second COVID-19 booster dose.
CharacteristicsN%
COVID-19 vaccination uptake
Number of doses of COVID-19 vaccination
0164.3
1133.5
212333.2
320555.4
4133.5
Types of second COVID-19 booster dose (among 13 participants who had received the second booster dose)
CoronaVac538.5
Comirnaty861.5
Side-effects of the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (among 13 participants who had received the second booster dose)
Not at all646.2
Very mild323.1
Mild323.1
Moderate00.0
Severe00.0
Very severe17.7
Likelihood to receive the second COVID-19 booster dose in the future 6 months (among 357 participants who had not received the second booster dose)
Very unlikely/unlikely/neutral18752.4
Likely/very likely17047.6
Perceptions related to COVID-19 and the second booster dose
Perceived susceptibility to COVID-19, high/very high
Chance of COVID-19 infection143.8
Chance of having another wave of COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong8924.0
Perceived Susceptibility Scale 1
Mean (SD)		5.3(1.3)
Median (IQR)5.0(4, 6)
Perceived severity of COVID-19, high
Chance of having severe illness caused by COVID-197821.1
Chance of having financial difficulties caused by COVID-19 3910.5
Chance of transmitting COVID-19 to family members12233.0
Perceived Severity Scale 2
Mean (SD)		5.3(1.7)
Median (IQR)5.0(4, 6)
Perceived benefit of the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, agree
Receiving a second booster dose can maintain your antibody level and strengthen the protection against COVID-1921959.2
A second booster dose is highly effective in protecting from the Omicron variant17747.8
A second booster dose is highly effective in preventing severe consequences of COVID-1927373.8
Perceived Benefit Scale 3
Mean (SD)		7.5(1.6)
Median (IQR)8.0(6, 9)
Perceived barrier to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, agree
The protection offered by the second booster dose is weaker among people with older age6116.5
The level of side effects of the second booster dose is more severe among people with older age6317.0
The duration of protection offered by the second booster dose is shorter among people with older age7420.0
Presence of chronic diseases would decrease the protection of the second booster dose12634.1
Perceived Barrier Scale 4
Mean (SD)		7.3(2.4)
Median (IQR)8.0(5, 9)
Cue to action related to the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, agree
Your family doctors would suggest you to receive the second booster dose10027.0
Your family members would suggest you to receive the second booster dose16243.8
Cue to Action Scale 5
Mean (SD)		4.6(0.9)
Median (IQR)4.0(4, 5)
Perceived self-efficacy to take up the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, agree
You are confident to receive the second booster dose32186.8
Item score, mean (SD)2.80.5
Median (IQR)3.0(3, 3)
Tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination (vaccine fatigue), agree20154.3
Item score, mean (SD)2.1(1.0)
Median (IQR)3.0(1, 3)
Frequency of exposure to the following contents on TV, radio, newspaper and Internet in the past month
People infected with COVID-19 after receiving three doses of COVID-19 vaccines, sometimes/always23463.3
Item score, mean (SD)2.7(1.0)
Median (IQR)3.0(2, 3)
People recovered from COVID-19 without seeking medical consultation, sometimes/always17962.2
Item score, mean (SD)2.7(1.0)
Median (IQR)3.0(2, 3)
Thoughtful consideration about the veracity of COVID-19-specific information, sometimes/always19853.5
Item score, mean (SD)2.5(1.1)
Median (IQR)3.0(2, 4)
1 Perceived Susceptibility Scale, 2 items, Cronbach’s alpha: 0.63. 2 Perceived Severity Scale, 3 items, Cronbach’s alpha: 0.70. 3 Perceived Benefit Scale. 3 items, Cronbach’s alpha: 0.76. 4 Perceived Barrier Scale, 4 items, Cronbach’s alpha: 0.81. 5 Cue to Action Scale, 2 items, Cronbach’s alpha: 0.68.
Table
Table 3. Associations between background characteristics and hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.
Table 3. Associations between background characteristics and hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.
CharacteristicsOR (95%CI)p Values
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, years
65–691.0
70–740.93 (0.59, 1.47)0.76
75 or above 1.15 (0.65, 2.04)0.64
Gender
Male1.0
Female1.92 (1.26, 2.94)0.002
Relationship status
Currently single1.0
Married or cohabited with a partner0.82 (0.51, 1.31)0.41
Education level
Primary or below1.0
Secondary0.71 (0.46, 1.09)0.12
Tertiary or above 0.58 (0.29, 1.17)0.13
Current employment status
Unemployed/retired/housewife1.0
Full-time/part-time0.65 (0.35, 1.18)0.15
Monthly household income, HK$ (US$)
<20,000 (2580)1.0
20,000 (2580) or above 0.55 (0.30, 1.03)0.06
Refuse to disclose0.67 (0.36, 1.26)0.21
Receiving Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA)
No1.0
Yes0.61 (0.28, 1.34)0.22
Living alone
No1.0
Yes1.64 (0.96, 2.83)0.07
Health conditions
Presence of any chronic conditions
No1.0
Yes0.89 (0.58, 1.34)0.57
History of COVID-19 infection
No1.0
Yes1.37 (0.86, 2.19)0.19
History of seasonal influenza vaccination
No1.0
Yes0.68 (0.44, 1.06)0.09
History of pneumococcal vaccination
No1.0
Yes0.79 (0.50, 1.23)0.29
OR: crude odds ratios. CI: confidence interval.
Table
Table 4. Factors associated with hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.
Table 4. Factors associated with hesitancy to receive the second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.
OR (95%CI)p ValuesAOR (95%CI)p Values
Perceptions related to COVID-19 and the second booster dose
Perceived Susceptibility Scale0.97 (0.83, 1.14)0.740.94 (0.80, 1.11)0.49
Perceived Severity Scale1.00 (0.89, 1.12)0.950.99 (0.88, 1.11)0.83
Perceived Benefit Scale0.52 (0.44, 0.61)<0.0010.50 (0.42, 0.60)<0.001
Perceived Barrier Scale1.21 (1.11, 1.32)<0.0011.23 (1.12, 1.34)<0.001
Cue to Action Scale0.41 (0.31, 0.53)<0.0010.39 (0.30, 0.52)<0.001
Perceived self-efficacy0.37 (0.21, 0.64)<0.0010.37 (0.21, 0.66)0.001
Tired of receiving repeated COVID-19 vaccination (vaccine fatigue)1.97 (1.58, 2.46)<0.0011.90 (1.52, 2.38)<0.001
Frequency of exposure to the following contents on TV, radio, newspaper and Internet in the past month
People infected with COVID-19 after receiving three doses of COVID-19 vaccines1.05 (0.85, 1.28)0.671.02 (0.83, 1.53)0.83
People recovered from COVID-19 without seeking medical consultation0.95 (0.78, 1.17)0.950.92 (0.74, 1.13)0.41
Thoughtful consideration about the veracity of COVID-19-specific information0.94 (0.78, 1.13)0.510.91 (0.76, 1.10)0.32
OR: crude odds ratios. AOR: adjusted odds ratios, odds ratios adjusted for gender. CI: confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chan, P.S.-f.; Lee, M.L.-t.; Fang, Y.; Yu, F.-y.; Ye, D.; Chen, S.; Kawuki, J.; Liang, X.; Wang, Z. Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey. Vaccines 2023, 11, 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020392

AMA Style

Chan PS-f, Lee ML-t, Fang Y, Yu F-y, Ye D, Chen S, Kawuki J, Liang X, Wang Z. Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey. Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):392. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020392

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chan, Paul Shing-fong, Marco Lok-tin Lee, Yuan Fang, Fuk-yuen Yu, Danhua Ye, Siyu Chen, Joseph Kawuki, Xue Liang, and Zixin Wang. 2023. "Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020392

APA Style

Chan, P. S.-f., Lee, M. L.-t., Fang, Y., Yu, F.-y., Ye, D., Chen, S., Kawuki, J., Liang, X., & Wang, Z. (2023). Hesitancy to Receive the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey. Vaccines, 11(2), 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020392

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop