Next Article in Journal
Protective and Pain-Killer Effects of AMC3, a Novel N-Formyl Peptide Receptors (FPRs) Modulator, in Experimental Models of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Next Article in Special Issue
Exogenous Abscisic Acid Affects the Heat Tolerance of Rice Seedlings by Influencing the Accumulation of ROS
Previous Article in Journal
Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid Filler Increases Extracellular Matrix by Modulating Macrophages and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Aged Animal Skin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Peroxide and GA3 Levels Regulate the High Night Temperature Response in Pistils of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differences in Physiological Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Combined Waterlogging and Cadmium Stresses

1
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park 48, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
3
Vegetable Institute, Jiangsu Academy of Agriculture Science, Nanjing 210095, China
4
Shanghai Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Shanghai 201400, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(6), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061205
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 2 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Antioxidant Metabolism in Plant Stress Responses)

Abstract

Waterlogging and heavy mental (e.g., cadmium) stress are two primary threats to crop growth. The combination of abiotic stresses was common and frequent, especially in the field condition. Even though the effects of individual waterlogging and cadmium on tomato plants have been widely investigated, the response of tomatoes under combined waterlogging and cadmium stress remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify and compare physiological, biochemical characteristics and plant growth of two tomato genotypes under individual and combined stress. Two tomato genotypes (‘MIX-002’ and ‘LA4440’) were treated under control, waterlogging, cadmium stress and their combination. The results showed that chloroplast ultrastructure of tomatoes under individual and combined stress was damaged with disordered stroma and grana lamellae. The H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) content and O2·− (superoxide anion radical) production rate of plants under all the three stresses was not significantly higher than the control except for ‘LA4440’ under the combined stress. Antioxidant enzymes actively responded in the two tomato genotypes, as shown by significant increase in SOD activity from ‘MIX-002’ under waterlogging and combined stress and from ‘LA4440’ under cadmium. Meanwhile, CAT activity of ‘MIX-002’ under waterlogging and ‘LA4440′ under combined stress significantly decreased, and the POD activity of ‘MIX-002’ under combined stress significantly increased as compared with the respective control. The APX activity of ‘MIX-002’ and ‘LA4440’ under combined stress was significantly lower and higher than the respective controls. This indicated that tomato plants were able to secure redox homeostasis and protect plants from oxidative damage through the synergetic regulation of antioxidant enzymes. Plant height and biomass of the two genotypes under individual and combined stress significantly decreased, which could be a direct result from the chloroplast alteration and resource re-allocation. Overall, the effects of combined waterlogging and cadmium stress were not simply the sum of individual effects on two tomato genotypes. Distinct ROS (reactive oxygen species) scavenging systems of two tomato genotypes under stresses suggest a genotype-dependent antioxidant enzymes regulation.
Keywords: tomato; waterlogging; cadmium stress; combined stress; ROS metabolism; plant growth tomato; waterlogging; cadmium stress; combined stress; ROS metabolism; plant growth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, R.; Niu, L.; Yin, J.; Jiang, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, W. Differences in Physiological Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Combined Waterlogging and Cadmium Stresses. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061205

AMA Style

Zhou R, Niu L, Yin J, Jiang F, Wang Y, Zhao T, Wu Z, Zhu W. Differences in Physiological Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Combined Waterlogging and Cadmium Stresses. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(6):1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Rong, Lifei Niu, Jian Yin, Fangling Jiang, Yinlei Wang, Tongmin Zhao, Zhen Wu, and Weimin Zhu. 2023. "Differences in Physiological Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Combined Waterlogging and Cadmium Stresses" Antioxidants 12, no. 6: 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061205

APA Style

Zhou, R., Niu, L., Yin, J., Jiang, F., Wang, Y., Zhao, T., Wu, Z., & Zhu, W. (2023). Differences in Physiological Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Combined Waterlogging and Cadmium Stresses. Antioxidants, 12(6), 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061205

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop