Next Article in Journal
Comparing Mitochondrial Activity, Oxidative Stress Tolerance, and Longevity of Thirteen Ascomycota Yeast Species
Previous Article in Journal
Altered Lipid Moieties and Carbonyls in a Wistar Rat Dietary Model of Subclinical Fatty Liver: Potential Sex-Specific Biomarkers of Early Fatty Liver Disease?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/antiox12101809
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant Polyphenols from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Honey: Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages

by
Caijun Ren
1,†,
Qiangqiang Li
1,†,
Teng Luo
2,
Mirko Betti
3,
Miao Wang
1,
Suzhen Qi
1,
Liming Wu
4,* and
Liuwei Zhao
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
2
Institute of NBC Defence, Beijing 102205, China
3
Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
4
Risk Assessment Laboratory for Bee Products Quality and Safety of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100093, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(10), 1809; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101809
Submission received: 2 August 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 28 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural and Synthetic Antioxidants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although the honey produced by Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. is precious because of its medicinal value, its pharmacological mechanism is still unclear. Here, its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant functions on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated murine RAW 264.7 macrophages were analyzed using targeted and non-targeted metabolomics. Results showed that twelve polyphenols were identified in L. bicolor honey using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. L. bicolor honey extract could scavenge the free radicals DPPH• and ABTS+ and reduce Fe3+. Furthermore, pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract significantly decreased NO production; suppressed the expression of COX-2, IL-10, TNF-α, and iNOS; and upregulated HO-1′s expression in the cells with LPS application. UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS-based metabolomics results revealed that L. bicolor honey extract could protect against inflammatory damage caused by LPS through the reduced activation of sphingolipid metabolism and necroptosis pathways. These findings demonstrate that L. bicolor honey possesses excellent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cells can produce free radicals during normal metabolism; however, once normal metabolism is disrupted by stress, excessive free radicals can be produced, leading to cell damage [1,2]. Oxidative stress and the excess of free radicals can be caused by several factors, one of which is the inflammation that occurs during the body’s natural immune response [3]. The progression of asthma, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, and infertility was reported to be accelerated by inflammatory and oxidative stress [4]. When the body suffers harm from factors such as physical injury, toxins, and microorganisms [5,6], macrophage immune cells come into prominent play not only during the inflammatory response but also in the repair of tissue damage [7]. Hence, the inflammatory response is considered as a beneficial process to help the body defend against pathogens; however, excessive inflammation can induce fatal tissue damage [8].
Macrophage cells are widely distributed in the body and play the role of phagocyting foreign bodies, clearing bacteria, and fighting inflammatory diseases. Once inflammatory and oxidative stress progress happen, macrophage cells are activated along with the ossification of the cellular membrane. Then, macrophage cells begin to secrete proinflammatory cytokines [7]. The RAW 264.7 cell line is extensively used as a reliable cell model to study the physiological function of macrophages. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as an effective stimulator in immune defense is applied to the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 to study its anti-inflammatory or antioxidant functions [9]. LPS stimulated RAW 264.7 cells to secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, iNOS, and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), leading to the NO generation. The latter can result in excessive nitric oxide (NO) [10]. While NO plays an important role in intracellular signal transduction [11], as a free radical, its excess accumulation during the inflammatory response can lead to severe toxicity [1]. Currently, anti-inflammatory drugs are used to regulate the levels of inflammatory cytokines to reduce inflammation but are associated with some side effects [12]. Identification of functional foods and dietary supplements that can reduce inflammation is an active research area.
During the early stage of the inflammatory response, inflammatory mediator TNF-α can be accumulated. This activates the production of neutrophil granulocytes and leukomonocytes, enhancing the permeability of vascular endothelium and accelerating the secretion of IL-10 and COX-2 [13]. IL-10, which is produced as a feedback factor from the stress response under TNF-α or other toxins stimulating macrophages, can inhibit the inflammatory process such as the migration of inflammatory cytokines [14]. As a key factor in promoting inflammation, the activation of COX-2 led to aggravated inflammatory reactions and damaged tissues [15].
LPS can induce the excessive expression of iNOS transcripts to promote NO production and cause dystrophy or hypoxia in macrophages [16]. While iNOS can make NO as a free radical during oxidative stress, it helps the macrophages defend against pathogens under normal conditions [17]. Another important marker is Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which encodes an important antioxidative enzyme that shows increased expression during oxidative stress. HO-1 effectively scavenges ROS, including peroxides, peroxynitrite, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide radicals [18]. HO-1 expression is activated by LPS, which helps inhibit inflammation and oxidative damage by reducing NO production and protecting macrophages against oxidative stress [19]. Therefore, the mRNA levels of these cytokine genes may work as valid indicators to evaluate antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. (L. bicolor) blooms have been traditionally used in medicine as a means of removing toxins, replenishing energy, and regulating symptoms associated with diabetes. It has also been used to treat acute and chronic nephritis, azotemia, and promote diuresis [20]. More recently, its antioxidant activity has been studied and has shown promise as a treatment for endothelial dysfunction [21,22]. Honeys produced by honeybees (Apis mellifera) from medicinal plants such as clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) and Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [23,24]. In particular, Manuka honey was shown to modulate the production of nuclear factor caspase 3, p-p38, and p-Erk 1/2 proteins to protect macrophages against LPS-induced inflammation [25]. Manuka plants exert antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities, contributing to the bioactivities of manuka honey [26]. The flowering Asian shrub L. bicolor plant also has many biological activities. We consider that L. bicolor honey has potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities for exploitation.
Therefore, in this study, our goal is to use an LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cell model to identify the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions of L. bicolor honey and its underlying molecular mechanisms. To this end, we first investigated the composition and levels of major polyphenols in L. bicolor honey using UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS and UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. We then detected free radical (including DPPH•, ABTS+, and Fe3+) scavenging abilities and determined the expression levels of a number of oxidation- and inflammation-related genes to assess the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions that occur in the L. bicolor honey. Finally, cellular metabolites were analyzed based on the UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Reagents

Chemical reagents like ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile, and formic acid were all of chromatographic grade from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). Using a Milli-Q Plus instrument from Merk KGaA, 18.2 MΩ.cm water was made (Darmstadt, Germany1). Folin–Ciocalteu and aluminum nitrate were supplied by Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Chemical standards including chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, vitexin, rutin, gallic acid, myricitrin, morin, glycitein, wogonin, kaempferol-3-O-sophoroside, liquiritigenin, and butin were obtained from Yuanye Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), with >98% purity. The extract was concentrated on Bond Elut PPL 6 cc, 500 mg C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge that was purchased from Agilent Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). High-glucose (4.5 g/L) Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM), which contains 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 100 U/mL of penicillin, was obtained from Gibco Laboratories (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Escherichia coli 0111: B4 LPS was a Sigma product (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Collection and Processing of Honey

Honey samples were collected from an apiary located in an L. bicolor plantation (Da Hinggan Ling Prefecture, China) in August 2020. Palynological analysis showed that L. bicolor honey contained ~70% L. bicolor pollen grains. It meant L. bicolor honey was monofloral honey that met the pollen grain threshold (≥45%) [25].
A total of 5 g of honey was dissolved in 10 mL of water, and after a one-minute vortex, the solution was centrifuged for five minutes at 8000× g, and the supernatant was collected for the following use. The SPE C18 cartridges were used to enrich the polyphenol compounds in the supernatant, and then, methanol was used as an elution agent to collect polyphenol compounds from the cartridges [25]. Finally, the eluted solution was dried with nitrogen gas and subsequently dissolved with 1 mL of ethanol to obtain a final solution (200 mg/mL) for the following study.

2.3. Determination of Polyphenol and Flavonoid Content

In our previous study, the total content of polyphenol in the L. bicolor honey extract was examined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, and it was defined as gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) [27]. Additionally, the total content of flavonoids from honey was determined using the aluminum nitrate method, and it was taken as quercetin equivalents (QEs) [27].

2.4. UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS Parameter

The chromatography was performed via a 1290 HPLC system, with a 2.1 × 100 mm i.d Eclipse Plus C18 column obtained from Agilent Technology Co., Ltd. (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Analytes were separated via water and acetonitrile (both A and B containing 0.1% formic acid, v/v) according to a gradient elution program (5% B for 0 min, followed by 5% B for 2 min, 100% B for 20 min, and 100% B for 25 min), with a 0.3 mL/min flow rate. Post-time was 5 min, and the column was always kept constant at 40 °C.
MS measurements were carried out via Q-TOF with an electrospray ionization source by Agilent Technology Co., Ltd. (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The conditions are as follows: gas temperature of 325 °C (at a 10 L/min flow rate), nebulizer pressure of 35 psi, sheath gas temperature of 370 °C (at a 12 L/min flow rate), fragmentor voltage of 135 V, and the acquisition ranges between m/z 100 and 1700. m/z 121.0508, m/z 922.0097, m/z 112.9855, and m/z 1033.9881 were, respectively, used for mass accuracy monitoring and calibration on positive and negative ionization modes. The RAW 264.7 cell metabolite samples were scanned in the positive ionization mode. L. bicolor honey samples were in the negative ionization mode. The acquired raw data files were transformed to CEF files through Mass Hunter Profinder 8.0 software from Agilent Technology Co., Ltd. (Santa Clara, CA, USA) after filtration using peak height ≥ 1500 counts and absolute height ≥ 10,000 counts. Then, the filtered data were matched to the METLIN database (a metabolite mass spectral database) of Scripps Research using Mass Profiler Professional software B.10.0 from Agilent Technology Co., Ltd., (Santa Clara, CA, USA) with thresholds of a database score > 70 and mass error < 10 ppm.

2.5. UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS Analysis

UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS was carried out via a UHPLC/MS system, with an Eclipse Plus C18 analytical column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 µm), obtained from Agilent Technology Co., Ltd. (Santa Clara, CA, USA), at a 0.35 mL/min flow rate. A total of 2 µL of water + 0.1% formic acid (v/v) (A) and acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid mobile phase (v/v) (B) were used for the mobile phase, respectively. The gradient elution process was as follows: 5% B at the beginning; followed by 5% B at the 1st min; 50% B in the 2nd min; 50% B in the 5th min; 100% B at minute 5.1; and 100% B at the 6th min. Post run time was set as 2 min. The ingredients were examined through a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) system. The parameters for ESI source were as follows: 3.5 kV capillary voltage, 380 V fragmentor voltage, 200 °C drying gas (with a 15 L/min flow rate), 330 °C sheath gas (flow rate of 12 L/min), and 45 psi nebulizer pressure. The related compounds ionization parameters are listed in Table S1.

2.6. In Vitro Antioxidant Assays

The antioxidant properties of L. bicolor honey extract were analyzed using free radical scavenging and reducing ability assay kits to perform DPPH•, ABTS+ assay, and FRAP assay from Solarbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
For DPPH• radical scavenging activity determination, 190 μL of 0.2 mmol/L DPPH-ethanol solution was mixed with 10 μL of a different concentration of L. bicolor honey extract solution, and the mixture was vortexed for 30 s, then left to stand for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. Vitamin C was used as a positive control [21]. The absorbance was detected at 517 nm.
The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) was expressed as follows:
( % ) = A 1 − ( A 2 − A 0 ) A 0 × 100 %
where A1 is the absorbance of a mixture of 190 μL of DPPH–ethanol and 10 μL of ethanol, A2 is the absorbance of different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract solution or positive control with DPPH–ethanol, and A0 is the absorbance of the control group instead of DPPH–ethanol solution.
For ABTS+ radical scavenging activity determination: 10 μL of different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract solution was added to 190 μL of work solution (5 mL 7 mol/L ABTS solution and 88 μL 140 mmol/L K2S2O8 solution) and vortexed for 30 s, then the mixture was kept for 6 min in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 415 nm.
For FRAP reducing ability determination: 180 μL work solution (0.3 mol/L acetic acid buffer, 10 mmol/L TPTZ solution, and 20 mmol/L FeCl3 solution) were mixed with 5 μL of different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract solution and vortexed for 30 s. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 593 nm.

2.7. Cell Culture

2.7.1. Cell Incubation and Assay

The mouse peritoneal macrophage cells, supplied by the Cell Bank of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (Shanghai, China), were cultured in DMEM and stored with 5% CO2 at 37 °C at the concentration of 1 × 105/mL. Then, it was pretreated with different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract. Their viability was cultured in 96-well plates with 1 × 105/mL of seeding density at the 4th passage and evaluated with a cell counting kit-8 from Dojindo Inc. (Kumamoto, Japan). The 450 nm absorbance was examined via microplate reader software from SpectraMax® i3 Platform (Silicon, CA, USA).

2.7.2. LPS-Induced NO Measurement

After growing for 24 h in 24-well plates, 1 × 105/mL of seeding density RAW 264.7 cells at the 5th passage were conducted 1 h pretreatment with different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract (50, 100, and 200 μg/mL) and 24 h induction with 1 µg/mL of LPS. The LPS-induced NO was detected using a NO detection kit from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China) according to the Griess reaction. The 540 nm absorbance was checked via a microplate reader from SpectraMax® i3 Platform (Silicon, CA, USA).

2.7.3. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

After 1 h incubation with L. bicolor honey extract and 6 h stimulation with 1 µg/mL of LPS, the RAW 264.7 cells’ RNA were extracted using an RNA Pure Kit from Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., (Beijing, China) and quantified via the Nano Drop 2000 system. A qRT-PCR was performed on a 7500c Real-time PCR detection system (Hangzhou, China), with specific primers (Table S2). The RT-qPCR program was set as follows: initial holding stage at 95 °C for 30 s; followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s; and then at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and 95 °C for 1 s. The expression status of target genes was assayed using the 2−ΔΔCt method, with GAPDH as an internal reference.

2.7.4. Collection of Metabolites from LPS-Treated Cells

RAW 264.7 cells at the 5th passage were incubated in 6-well plates with 1 × 105/mL of seeding density when their concentration was reached. The cells first received 1 h of pretreatment with different concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract. And then, they were conducted with a 24 h induction with LPS (1 µg/mL). Finally, the cells were centrifuged to precipitate cells (2500× g, 5 min), followed by a PBS wash, addition of 1 mL of methanol/acetonitrile/water mixture (2:2:1, volume ratio), and 5 min centrifugation (10,000× g, 4 °C), 1 min vortex, and the supernatant was dried with nitrogen gas after being moved into a new tube. Cellular extracts were redissolved in a 50% acetonitrile solution and ready for injection after a 0.22 μm filtering. A combined equal volume of each sample was used to obtain a quality control (QC) sample for data variance.

2.7.5. UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS

RAW 264.7 cell metabolites were acquired through UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS, with specific parameters set according to the protocol outlined in Section 2.4.

2.8. Statistics

Our statistical data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honest tests were adopted to compare the significant differences among different treatment groups in Section 3.4, Section 3.5 and Section 3.6 using IBM SPSS version 23.0 from IBM Corporation (Shanghai, China). p ˂ 0.05 refers to a significant difference. The screened metabolites with KEGG ID obtained from a volcano analysis were input into MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca, accessed on 6 June 2022), then linked to KEGG (http://www.kegg.jp, accessed on 6 June 2022) to perform metabolic pathway analyses, and p < 0.05 was set as a threshold. Mus musculus was chosen as the pathway organism.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Polyphenols and Flavonoids Content on L. bicolor Honey

Polyphenols and flavonoids are identified as the major compounds in honey because of their medical functions, which are antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-cancer, etc. [4,28]. As shown in Table S3, the total polyphenol content of L. bicolor honey was 147.7 ± 3.3 µg GAE/g honey, and the total flavonoid content was 8.5 ± 0.8 µg QE/g honey. Both the polyphenol and flavonoid content of L. bicolor honey were found to be higher as compared to other honeys. For instance, a total polyphenol content of 22.6–72.8 µg GAE/g was reported for Portuguese honey [29]; an average of 86.7 µg GAE/g was reported for Turkey rhododendron honey [30]; and 16.0–120.0 µg GAE/g for oak honey [31]. The total flavonoid content of honey from jujube, cactus, and multifloral honeys were found to be 5.7 ± 0.01, 11.6 ± 0.3, and 5.3 ± 0.2 µg QE/g, respectively [32]. The results indicate that L. bicolor honey contains abundant polyphenols and flavonoids, which could potentially contribute to its biological activity.

3.2. The Detection of Polyphenols in L. bicolor Honey

Polyphenols were identified using a non-targeted metabolomics analysis based on UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS (Table S4). For instance, chlorogenic acid, glycitein, and vitexin were identified at a m/z of 353.0878, 283.0612, and 431.0984, respectively. The typical chromatography spectra of 12 polyphenol compounds in standard solutions and L. bicolor honey extract are shown in Figure 1. Further, UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS was performed to quantify the major polyphenols in 48 L. bicolor honey samples from eight different apiaries. Results in Table 1 show high levels of chlorogenic acid (16.3 ± 5.7 mg/kg) and glycitein (17.3 ± 3.4 mg/kg) in L. bicolor honey. Chlorogenic acid belongs to a product of aerobic respiration found in the honey of nectar source plants [33]. Chlorogenic acid is a phenylpropanoid with antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, antihyperlipidemic, and other biological activities [34]. Glycitein is an o-methylated isoflavone with free radical scavenging activity and phytoestrogen activity that has potential application in preventing the occurrence of cerebrovascular diseases [35]. Additionally, the extract contained high levels of other flavonoids such as rutin, myricitrin, and wogonin. These results indicate that L. bicolor honey is rich in polyphenols.

3.3. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of L. bicolor Honey

Our results suggest that L. bicolor honey extract contains abundant phenolics such as phenolic acid (chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, gallic acid, etc.) and flavonoids (myricitrin, rutin, vitexin, etc.), which are known to have excellent antioxidant activity. The scavenging of DPPH• and ABTS+ and the reduction in Fe3+ have been commonly used to evaluate the antioxidant activities of substances [36]. Antioxidant activity was measured as a percentage of decreasing DPPH•, ABTS+, and Fe3+ absorbance of extract. The difference in absorbance value is caused by the presence of antioxidants in each extract. IC50 was calculated from a calibration curve obtained by plotting percentage inhibition versus extract concentration. A lower IC50 value would reflect greater antioxidant activity. The IC50 value of L. bicolor honey extract for scavenging DPPH• and ABTS+ radicals and the reduction in Fe3+ was 0.2 ± 0.05 mg/g of honey, 0.5 ± 0.04 mg/g of honey, and 0.5 ± 0.01 mg/g of honey, respectively, which are comparable to vitamin C (Figure 2). As reported, the IC50 values of other types of honey such as spruce honey, fir honey, chestnut honey, and multifloral honey for scavenging DPPH• radicals were 7.2–10.7 mg/g of honey [35]. And the IC50 value of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus Hsiao honey for scavenging ABTS+ radical was 3.3 g/mL of honey [36]. The antioxidant capacity of these honeys was lower than that of L. bicolor honey. Our results suggest that L. bicolor honey extract could be potentially advantageous as a bioactive supplement for exerting antioxidative functions.

3.4. Effect of L. bicolor Honey Extract on RAW 264.7 Cells Viability

As shown in Figure 3, 50–200 µg/mL of L. bicolor honey extract in treatment groups did not show significantly decreased cell viability when compared to the blank control (p > 0.05, Figure 3A). A dose of 400 µg/mL of L. bicolor honey extract apparently (p < 0.05) decreased cell viability. Therefore, the 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL of treated L. bicolor honey extracts were kept for the following experiments.

3.5. Influence of NO Production Treating with L. bicolor Honey Extract on RAW 264.7 Cells Inducing by LPS

Macrophages may secrete excessive amounts of NO, activating transmembrane molecular signals that can harm the surrounding tissues and organs during the inflammation process [37]. LPS stimulation can promote the process of NO production and inflammation in RAW 264.7 cells. Therefore, NO production is usually taken as an indicator to evaluate the inflammatory degrees of LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. A concentration-dependent inhibition of LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells on NO production was observed (Figure 3B). Specifically, pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract of 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL treatment groups caused significantly decreased NO production (p < 0.05) when compared with the LPS group. This suggests that L. bicolor honey extract has the potential to inhibit NO release and mitigate the inflammation response induced by LPS.

3.6. L. bicolor Honey Extract Affects the Oxidation- and Inflammation-Response-Related Genes’ Expression

L. bicolor honey extract pretreatment was observed to have a dose-dependent effect on the cytokines expression in RAW 264.7 cells induced by LPS (Figure 3), significantly reducing the expression levels of COX-2, IL-10, TNF-α, and iNOS in the cells treated by LPS (p < 0.05, Figure 3C–F). Conversely, pretreatment with 100 µg/mL of L. bicolor honey extract led to the significant activated HO-1 expression (p < 0.05) in comparison with the treatment only by LPS (Figure 3G). The reduction in IL-10, COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-α expression and increase in HO-1 expression indicate that cells treated with L. bicolor honey extract show improved resistance to LPS-induced oxidative stress, highlighting its potential as both an anti-inflammatory and antioxidative agent.

3.7. Effect of L. bicolor Honey Extract on Cell Metabolism

To better learn the metabolomic differences among blank, LPS, and three L. bicolor honey extract treatment groups, we analyzed the cellular metabolites using UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the blank, LPS, and L. bicolor honey extract treatment groups were well separated with extensive overlap between the concentration of 100 and 200 µg/mL treated groups (Figure S1A). We then compared the metabolomic profiles between blank and LPS groups and between the 100 µg/mL L. bicolor honey extract treatment and LPS groups, with a filtration threshold of p ˂ 0.05, |log2FC| ˃ 2 (Figure S1B). Different metabolites were analyzed using the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The analysis revealed that sphingolipid metabolism and the necroptosis pathway were repressed by L. bicolor honey extract on RAW 264.7 cells treated with LPS (Figure 4). Specifically, ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) were promoted in the RAW 264.7 cells treated with LPS, and this increase was greatly attenuated with pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract (Table 2).
Ceramide is decarboxylated by ceramide synthetase after which it is metabolized into sphingosine and other inflammatory cytokines, like TNF-α or IL-1β [38], and they could activate sphingosine kinases (SphKs) including SphK-1 and SphK-2, which could produce S1P from sphingosine [39]. S1P, as a signaling molecule, works in regulating many physiological and pathological activities, including apoptosis, cell proliferation, and regulating inflammation and cytokines involved in autoimmunity [40]. S1P has been demonstrated to be involved in suppressing proinflammatory cytokine production and inducing anti-inflammatory expression in macrophages [41]. In this study, RAW 264.7 cells showed enhanced production of sphingosine following LPS stimulation, which induced the inflammatory response. However, pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract inhibited the inflammatory response and down-regulated sphingosine production.
L. bicolor honey extract inhibited the conversion of ceramide to sphingosine and the release of other inflammatory cytokines, meanwhile, it promoted the production of S1P originating from sphingosine. S1P is an intracellular second messenger that can promote cell survival and proliferation and inhibit ceramide-induced apoptosis. Dynamic equilibrium between intracellular S1P and ceramide is very important for cell apoptosis [42]. Our results confirm that L. bicolor honey extract can bring the imbalance back to a normal level. Further phenotypic studies of mouse models have reported that LPS not only induced inflammation in mouse macrophages but also induced acute lung injury in mice [43]. Acute lung injury as an inflammatory response syndrome causes dysfunction of immune cells and an imbalance of immune factor secretion. Honey can inhibit lung inflammation and oxidative stress by reducing the level of inflammatory factors and has a protective effect on lung injury in mice [44]. The L. bicolor honey has been demonstrated to possess anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capabilities in a RAW 264.7 cell model induced by LPS, thereby exhibiting potential antioxidant activities in vivo.

4. Conclusions

This is the first report about the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of L. bicolor honey to RAW 264.7 cells induced by LPS. Based on UHPLC-QQQ-MS analysis, L. bicolor honey contained 12 phenolic substances for its biological activity research. L. bicolor honey extract exerted excellent free radical (DPPH• and ABTS+) scavenging and the ability to reduce Fe3+ to resist oxidative damage. It was also found that L. bicolor honey extract pretreatment could reduce NO production; suppress the expression of IL-10, COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-α; as well as upregulate the HO-1 expression. In addition, pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract reduced the activation of the sphingolipid metabolism and necroptosis pathways in RAW 264.7 cells. These results provide some scientific basis for further applications of L. bicolor honey as a natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent to benefit human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox12101809/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of metabolite profiles of LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells with or without pre-treatment with honey extract. (A) PCA analysis for cell metabolites from different treatment groups. (B) Volcano plot analysis for identifying the differences in metabolic profiles between different groups. Blue and red points referred to the down-regulated and up-regulated metabolites with significant differences in relative abundance between the indicated paired groups, respectively. The Blank group was not treated with L. bicolor honey extract or LPS; the LPS group was treated with 1 µg/mL LPS but not pretreated with L. bicolor honey extract; Honey group was pretreated with 100 µg/mL L. bicolor of honey extract and then stimulated by 1 µg/mL LPS; Table S1: Quantitative analysis of targeted polyphenol compounds by UHPLC-QQQ-MS; Table S2: Gene-specific primers for targeted cytokines; Table S3: Polyphenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of L. bicolor honey extract; Table S4: Qualitative analysis of polyphenol compounds by UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS.

Author Contributions

C.R.: writing—original draft; Q.L.: writing—review and editing; T.L.: data curation; M.B.: writing—editing; M.W.: formal analysis; S.Q.: investigation and methodology; L.W.: funding acquisition; L.Z.: supervision and validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32372941). And this work was supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program under Grant (CAAS-ASTIP-2022-IAR).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hernández, D.F.; Mojica, L.; Berhow, M.A.; Brownstein, K.; Cervantes, E.L.; de Mejia, E.G. Black and pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) unique mexican varieties exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pham-Huy, L.A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008, 4, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Seo, J.; Lee, U.; Seo, S.; Wibowo, A.E.; Pongtuluran, O.B.; Lee, K.; Han, S.B.; Cho, S. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of methanol extract of Piper betl Linn. (Piper betle L.) leaves and stems by inhibiting NF-κB/MAPK/Nrf2 signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 155, 113734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Samarghandian, S.; Farkhondeh, T.; Samini, F. Honey and health: A review of recent clinical research. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 9, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouviere, J.; Fortunato, R.S.; Dupuy, C.; Werneck-de-Castro, J.P.; Carvalho, D.P.; Louzada, R.A. Exercise-stimulated ROS sensitive signaling pathways in skeletal muscle. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, L.L.; Zhang, L.; Ren, L.C.; Xie, Y.X. Advances in structures required of polyphenols for xanthine oxidase inhibition. Food Front. 2020, 1, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gordon, S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 23–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deny, M.; Arroba Nuñez, L.A.; Romano, M.; Denis, O.; Casimir, G.; Chamekh, M. Sex difference in innate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization in Streptococcus agalactiae-induced pneumonia and potential role of microRNA-223-3p. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kacem, M.; Simon, G.; Leschiera, R.; Misery, L.; Eifeki, A.; Lebonvallet, N. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of Ruta chalepensis L. extracts on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2015, 51, 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Souza, N.C.; de Oliveira, J.M.; Morrone, M.D.S.; Albanus, R.D.; Amarante, M.D.S.M.; Camillo, C.D.S.; Langassner, S.M.Z.; Gelain, D.P.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Dalmolin, R.J.S.; et al. Turnera subulata anti-inflammatory properties in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laskin, D.L.; Sunil, V.R.; Gardner, C.R.; Laskin, J.D. Macrophages and tissue injury: Agents of defense or destruction? Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2011, 51, 267–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, B.; Gao, H.; Qi, H.; Chen, Y.; Paul Ross, R.; Stanton, C.; Zhao, J.X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.Q.; Chen, W. Linoleate isomerase complex contributes to metabolism and remission of DSS-induced colitis in mice of Lactobacillus plantarum ZS2058. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 8160–8171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Larsen, P.; Ahmed, M. Evaluation of antioxidant potential of honey drops and honey lozenges. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Purohit, P.; Roy, D.; Dwivedi, S.; Nebhinani, N.; Sharma, P. Association of miR-155, miR-187 and inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-alpha in chronic opium abusers. Inflammation 2022, 45, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vyshnevska, L.; Severina, H.I.; Prokopenko, Y.; Shmalko, A. Molecular docking investigation of anti-inflammatory herbal compounds as potential LOX-5 and COX-2 inhibitors. Pharmacia 2022, 69, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, X.; Song, M.Y.; Gao, Z.L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, M.Q.; Li, F.; Zheng, J.K.; Xiao, H. Nobiletin and its colonic metabolites suppress colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis by down-regulating iNOS, inducing antioxidative enzymes and arresting cell cycle progression. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 42, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, H.; Jia, Z.Q.; Misra, B.R.; Zhang, L.; Cao, Z.X.; Yamamoto, M.; Trush, M.A.; Misra, H.P.; Li, Y.B. Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2-dependent myocardiac cytoprotection against oxidative and electrophilic stress. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2008, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, C.C.; Hsiao, L.D.; Shih, Y.F.; Su, M.H.; Yang, C.M. Sphingosine 1-phosphate-upregulated COX-2/PGE (2) system contributes to human cardiac fibroblast apoptosis: Involvement of MMP-9-dependent transactivation of EGFR cascade. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 7664290. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yan, H.; Zhao, H.; Yi, S.W.; Zhuang, H.; Wang, D.W.; Jiang, J.G.; Shen, G.F. Sphingosine-1-phosphate protects against the development of cardiac remodeling via Sphingosine kinase 2 and the S1PR2/ERK pathway. Curr. Med. Sci. 2022, 42, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Do, M.H.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, K.; Kang, M.C.; Subedi, L.; Parveen, A.; Kim, S.Y. Therapeutic potential of Lespedeza bicolor to prevent methylglyoxal-induced glucotoxicity in familiar diabetic nephropathy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, N.N.; Zhao, L.W.; Zhao, Y.Z.; Li, Q.Q.; Xue, X.F.; Wu, L.M.; Escalada, M.G.; Wang, K.; Peng, W.J. Comparison of the chemical composition and biological activity of mature and immature honey: An HPLC/QTOF/MS-based metabolomic approach. J. Agri. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4062–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, J.H.; Jhoo, J.W. Antioxidant activity of different parts of Lespedeza bicolor and isolation of antioxidant compound. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 44, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Montaser, M.; Ali, A.T.; Sayed, A.M.; Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Zidan, E.W.; Orfali, R.; Rateb, M.E.; Zaki, M.A.; Hassan, H.M.; Mohammed, R.; et al. 1H-NMR metabolic profiling, antioxidant activity, and docking study of common medicinal plant-derived honey. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, W.; Zhang, X.Y.; He, Z.Q.; Chen, Y.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Meng, T.M.; Li, Y.F.; Cao, Y. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of eucalyptus leaf polyphenols extract and its effect on chicken meat quality and cecum microbiota. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, C.J.; Wang, K.; Luo, T.; Xue, X.F.; Wang, M.; Wu, L.M.; Zhao, L.W. Kaempferol-3-O-galactoside as a marker for authenticating Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. monofloral honey. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vaughn, M.B.; Gretchen, D.J. The r-values of honey: Pollen coefficients. Palynology 2011, 25, 11–28. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Q.Q.; Sun, M.H.; Wan, Z.R.; Liang, J.; Betti, M.; Hrynets, Y.; Xue, X.F.; Wu, L.M.; Wang, K. Bee pollen extracts modulate serum metabolism in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury mice with anti-inflammatory effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7855–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, R.T.; Lu, Y.F.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Chen, B.H. Determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids in Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) kurz. by high-performance-liquid-chromatography with photodiode-array detection and randem mass spectrometry. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 12, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Aires, E.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Estevinho, L.M. Antioxidant activity of Portuguese honey samples: Different contributions of the entire honey and phenolic extract. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1438–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silici, S.; Sagdic, O.; Ekici, L. Total phenolic content, antiradical, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Rhododendron honeys. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kolayli, S.; Can, Z.; Çakir, H.E.; Okan, O.T.; Yildiz, O. An investigation on Trakya region Oak (Quercus spp.) honeys of Turkey: Their physico-chemical, antioxidant and phenolic compounds properties. Turkish J. Biochem. 2018, 43, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wabaidur, S.M.; Obbed, M.S.; Alothman, Z.A.; Alfaris, N.A.; Badjah-Hadj-Ahmed, A.Y.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Aldayel, T.S. Total phenolic acids and flavonoid contents determination in Yemeni honey of various floral sources: Folin-Ciocalteu and spectrophotometric approach. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2020, 40, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hossen, M.S.; Ali, M.Y.; Jahurul, M.H.A.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Gan, S.H.; Khalil, M.I. Beneficial roles of honey polyphenols against some human degenerative diseases: A review. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017, 69, 1194–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ramanauskiene, K.; Savickas, A.; Inkeniene, A.; Vitkevicius, K.; Kasparaviciene, G.; Briedis, V.; Amsiejus, A. Analysis of content of phenolic acids in Lithuanian propolis using high-performance liquid chromatography technique. Medicina 2009, 45, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jasna, B.; Urška, D.; Mojca, J.; Terezija, G. Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 822–828. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, T.; Zhao, L.W.; Wang, M.; Qi, S.Z.; Xue, X.F.; Wu, L.M.; Li, Q.Q. Identification of characteristic markers for monofloral honey of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus Hsiao: A combined untargeted and targeted MS-based study. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodríguez, J.; Olea-Azar, C.; Cavieres, C.; Norambuena, E.; Delgado-Castro, T.; Soto-Delgado, J.; Araya-Maturana, R. Antioxidant properties and free radical scavenging reactivity of a family of hydroxynaphthalenones and dihydroxyanthracenones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 7058–7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Halliwell, B. Antioxidant characterization: Methodology and mechanism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 49, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zarei, M.; Fazlara, A.; Tulabifard, N. Effect of thermal treatment on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of honey. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Burow, P.; Klapperstück, M.; Markwardt, F. Activation of ATP secretion via volume-regulated anion channels by sphingosine-1-phosphate in RAW macrophages. Pflugers Arch. 2015, 467, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, L.; Lu, P.; Wang, Y. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and other immune-mediated diseases. Med. Chem. Res. 2022, 31, 2074–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, L.; Geng, X.J.; Ma, L.; Luo, C.; Zeng, W.S.; Ou, X.H.; Chen, L.N.; Quan, S.; Li, H. Sphingosine-1-phosphate inhibits ceramide-induced apoptosis during murine preimplantation embryonic development. Theriogenology 2013, 80, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fitzpatrick, M.; Young, S.P. Metabolomics—A novel window into inflammatory disease. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2013, 25, w13743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gan, Q.X.; Wang, X.; Cao, W.Y.J.; Zheng, S.; Ma, Y.T.; Huang, Q.W. NF-κB and AMPK-Nrf2 pathways support the protective effect of polysaccharides from Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 291, 115153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 12 01809 g001
Figure 1. Mass spectra of 12 polyphenol compounds in L. bicolor honey acquired in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. (A) gallic acid (169.0/125.0), (B) chlorogenic acid (353.0/190.9), (C) ferulic acid (193.1/177.9), (D) myricitrin (317.0/178.9), (E) rutin (609.0/301.0), (F) morin (301.0/151.0), (G) kaempferol-3-O-sophoroside (611.0/286.6), (H) butin (273.1/137.0), (I) vitexin (431.0/311.2), (J) liquiritigenin (257.1/137.0), (K) glycitein (283.0/139.8), and (L) wogonin (283.0/268.1). Black line is for standards; red line is for L. bicolor honey.
Figure 1. Mass spectra of 12 polyphenol compounds in L. bicolor honey acquired in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. (A) gallic acid (169.0/125.0), (B) chlorogenic acid (353.0/190.9), (C) ferulic acid (193.1/177.9), (D) myricitrin (317.0/178.9), (E) rutin (609.0/301.0), (F) morin (301.0/151.0), (G) kaempferol-3-O-sophoroside (611.0/286.6), (H) butin (273.1/137.0), (I) vitexin (431.0/311.2), (J) liquiritigenin (257.1/137.0), (K) glycitein (283.0/139.8), and (L) wogonin (283.0/268.1). Black line is for standards; red line is for L. bicolor honey.
Antioxidants 12 01809 g001
Antioxidants 12 01809 g002
Figure 2. Radical scavenging and reducing abilities of L. bicolor honey extract. The scavenging rate of the free radicals (A) DPPH and (B) ABTS+ as well as (C) Fe3+ reducing ability. Vitamin C was set as positive control for excluding false positives of the experiment and referring to the antioxidant of L. bicolor honey extract.
Figure 2. Radical scavenging and reducing abilities of L. bicolor honey extract. The scavenging rate of the free radicals (A) DPPH and (B) ABTS+ as well as (C) Fe3+ reducing ability. Vitamin C was set as positive control for excluding false positives of the experiment and referring to the antioxidant of L. bicolor honey extract.
Antioxidants 12 01809 g002
Antioxidants 12 01809 g003
Figure 3. Effect of L. bicolor honey extract on cell viability, NO production in RAW 264.7 cells, and the mRNA expression of key inflammation- and oxidation-related cytokine genes in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. (A) Effects of L. bicolor honey extract on the viability of RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract for 24 h. # p ˂ 0.05 compared to the blank group. (B) Effects of L. bicolor honey extract on LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h. LPS group referring to cells were treated with LPS in the absence of L. bicolor honey extract. The blank group referring to cells was treated with neither LPS nor L. bicolor honey extract. The relative transcript levels of (C) IL-10, (D) COX-2, (E) iNOS, (F) TNF-α, and (G) HO-1 were quantified using qRT-PCR. Cells were pretreated with L. bicolor honey extract at the indicated concentrations for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 6 h. ### p ˂ 0.001, compared to the blank group, which was not treated with L. bicolor honey extract or LPS; * p ˂ 0.05, **p ˂ 0.01, and ***p ˂ 0.001, compared to LPS group.
Figure 3. Effect of L. bicolor honey extract on cell viability, NO production in RAW 264.7 cells, and the mRNA expression of key inflammation- and oxidation-related cytokine genes in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. (A) Effects of L. bicolor honey extract on the viability of RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract for 24 h. # p ˂ 0.05 compared to the blank group. (B) Effects of L. bicolor honey extract on LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of L. bicolor honey extract for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h. LPS group referring to cells were treated with LPS in the absence of L. bicolor honey extract. The blank group referring to cells was treated with neither LPS nor L. bicolor honey extract. The relative transcript levels of (C) IL-10, (D) COX-2, (E) iNOS, (F) TNF-α, and (G) HO-1 were quantified using qRT-PCR. Cells were pretreated with L. bicolor honey extract at the indicated concentrations for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 6 h. ### p ˂ 0.001, compared to the blank group, which was not treated with L. bicolor honey extract or LPS; * p ˂ 0.05, **p ˂ 0.01, and ***p ˂ 0.001, compared to LPS group.
Antioxidants 12 01809 g003
Antioxidants 12 01809 g004
Figure 4. Pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract alters sphingolipid and necroptosis metabolism in LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells. (A) Enrichment analysis of the metabolic pathway using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for L. bicolor honey treatment group vs. LPS treatment group. (B) Differentially regulated sphingolipid metabolism and necroptosis pathway metabolites. The metabolite nodes in red indicate the compound up-regulated in LPS-treated group compared to the blank group, but it was down-regulated in honey-treated group compared to the LPS group.
Figure 4. Pretreatment with L. bicolor honey extract alters sphingolipid and necroptosis metabolism in LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells. (A) Enrichment analysis of the metabolic pathway using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for L. bicolor honey treatment group vs. LPS treatment group. (B) Differentially regulated sphingolipid metabolism and necroptosis pathway metabolites. The metabolite nodes in red indicate the compound up-regulated in LPS-treated group compared to the blank group, but it was down-regulated in honey-treated group compared to the LPS group.
Antioxidants 12 01809 g004
Table 1. The contents of major polyphenols in L. bicolor honey were detected using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS approach.
Table 1. The contents of major polyphenols in L. bicolor honey were detected using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS approach.
No.CompoundFormulaRT/minRegression EquationR2mg/kg
(Mean ± SD)
1Chlorogenic acidC16H18O91.4y = 21,979x + 31300.997916.28 ± 5.68
2Ferulic acidC10H10O43.3y = 6875x − 40.99991.42 ± 0.64
3VitexinC21H20O104.3y = 21,424x − 1210.99989.59 ± 2.79
4RutinC27H30O163.6y = 17,807x − 5080.99637.22 ± 2.90
5Gallic acidC7H6O51.4y = 2708x − 200.99245.04 ± 1.93
6MyricitrinC15H10O83.4y = 41x − 20.99495.43 ± 3.52
7MorinC15H10O73.6y = 440,451x + 12110.99634.39 ± 3.08
8Kaempferol-3-O-sophorosideC33H40O214.0y = 3201x − 50.99967.21 ± 1.94
9GlyciteinC16H12O54.8y = 6452x + 2720.996817.27 ± 3.37
10WogoninC16H12O54.8y = 50,170x + 29560.99407.07 ± 4.72
11ButinC15H12O54.0y = 65,503x − 2530.99722.77 ± 1.09
12LiquiritigeninC15H12O44.8y = 126,010x − 670.99993.60 ± 1.33
Table 2. Changes in sphingolipid content on RAW 264.7 cells induced by LPS resulting from incubation of L. bicolor honey extract.
Table 2. Changes in sphingolipid content on RAW 264.7 cells induced by LPS resulting from incubation of L. bicolor honey extract.
PathwayMetabolitesLPS Group vs. Blank Group aHoney Group b vs. LPS Group c
p-ValueLog2 (Fold
Change)		Trendp-ValueLog2 (Fold
Change)		Trend
Sphingolipid Metabolism/NecroptosisCeramide0.008713.36up0.0007−2.38down
Sphingosine0.00402.26up0.0380−2.22down
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)0.000513.42up0.0157−4.77down
a Blank group was not treated with L. bicolor honey extract or LPS; b honey group was pretreated with 100 µg/mL of L. bicolor honey extract, then treated with 1 µg/mL of LPS; c LPS group was treated with 1 µg/mL of LPS but not pretreated with L. bicolor honey extract.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, C.; Li, Q.; Luo, T.; Betti, M.; Wang, M.; Qi, S.; Wu, L.; Zhao, L. Antioxidant Polyphenols from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Honey: Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101809

AMA Style

Ren C, Li Q, Luo T, Betti M, Wang M, Qi S, Wu L, Zhao L. Antioxidant Polyphenols from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Honey: Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(10):1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Caijun, Qiangqiang Li, Teng Luo, Mirko Betti, Miao Wang, Suzhen Qi, Liming Wu, and Liuwei Zhao. 2023. "Antioxidant Polyphenols from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Honey: Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages" Antioxidants 12, no. 10: 1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101809

APA Style

Ren, C., Li, Q., Luo, T., Betti, M., Wang, M., Qi, S., Wu, L., & Zhao, L. (2023). Antioxidant Polyphenols from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Honey: Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Antioxidants, 12(10), 1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101809

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop