Next Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation of Sophora flavescens Root Extract Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Innate Immunity, and Disease Resistance against Edwardsiella tarda Challenge in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
Next Article in Special Issue
Brain Damage in Preterm and Full-Term Neonates: Serum Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Intervention
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase in Regulation of NOX-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perinatal Oxidative Stress and Kidney Health: Bridging the Gap between Animal Models and Clinical Reality
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Gestational Hypertension and High-Density Lipoprotein Function: An Explorative Study in Overweight/Obese Women of the DALI Cohort

Antioxidants 2023, 12(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010068
by Julia T. Stadler 1, M. N. M. van Poppel 2,*, Christina Christoffersen 3,4, David Hill 5, Christian Wadsack 6,7, David Simmons 8, Gernot Desoye 6, Gunther Marsche 1,* and DALI Core Investigator Group
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Antioxidants 2023, 12(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010068
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress in Fetuses and Newborns)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript ID: antioxidants-2056995

Title: Gestational hypertension and high-density lipoprotein function: An explorative study in overweight/obese women of the DALI cohort 

This study aimed to investigate GHTN-associated changes in HDL-related functional parameters in mothers and their offspring. Maternal and cord blood were used to determine multiple parameters. Their findings showed that GHTN was associated with significantly changes in HDL function in the offspring. The authors suggested that PON1 and apoM may serve as predictors for early identification of women at risk for developing GHTN. The topic described in this manuscript is interesting. However, the limitation of this study is small sample size (GHTN n=24). The sample size is too small to draw conclusions.

Author Response

Reviewer 1: This study aimed to investigate GHTN-associated changes in HDL-related functional parameters in mothers and their offspring. Maternal and cord blood were used to determine multiple parameters. Their findings showed that GHTN was associated with significantly changes in HDL function in the offspring. The authors suggested that PON1 and apoM may serve as predictors for early identification of women at risk for developing GHTN. The topic described in this manuscript is interesting. However, the limitation of this study is small sample size (GHTN n=24). The sample size is too small to draw conclusions.

 

Answer: We are pleased that our manuscript was positively received by the reviewer and are happy to consider the helpful comments.

We agree with the reviewer that the small sample size of women diagnosed with GHTN is a limitation of our study. According to the reviewer’s suggestion, we have deleted statements regarding prediction of GHTN in the manuscript and have addressed the small sample size in the limitations section. We have added the sentence “A limitation is the small sample size of GHTN patients. Therefore, further larger studies are needed to confirm our results and to draw firm conclusions” (line 338).

Reviewer 2 Report

This is very well-designed study and equally well-written manuscript. I concur with the authors about the limitations stated. However, due to the nature of the longitudinal study design, some of the limitations can be accommodated. The results are very clear and the statistical analyses and references from the data reflect the authors' conclusions. I support a decision to accept this manuscript for publication.

Author Response

Reviewer 2: This is very well-designed study and equally well-written manuscript. I concur with the authors about the limitations stated. However, due to the nature of the longitudinal study design, some of the limitations can be accommodated. The results are very clear and the statistical analyses and references from the data reflect the authors' conclusions. I support a decision to accept this manuscript for publication.

 Answer: We are pleased that our manuscript was favorably received by the reviewer and thank the reviewer for his positive comments.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

No further comments

Back to TopTop