Next Article in Journal
Effect of Heme Oxygenase-1 Depletion on Complement Regulatory Proteins Expression in the Rat
Next Article in Special Issue
Epilobium Species: From Optimization of the Extraction Process to Evaluation of Biological Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Quercetin Prevents Intestinal Stem Cell Aging via Scavenging ROS and Inhibiting Insulin Signaling in Drosophila
Previous Article in Special Issue
Actaea racemosa L. Rhizome Protect against MPTP-Induced Neurotoxicity in Mice by Modulating Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded PEG–PLGA Nanoparticles Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats

by
Mohammed Z. Nasrullah
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Antioxidants 2023, 12(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010060
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Delayed wound healing is a serious complication of diabetes and a main reason for foot amputation. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is a main active constituent of honeybee propolis with reported appealing pharmacological activities. In the current study, CAPE was loaded onto PEG–PLGA nanoparticles and showed a particle size of 198 ± 7.3 nm and polydispersity index of 0.43 ± 0.04. An in vivo study was performed to appraise the wound-healing activity of CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA nanoparticles (CAPE-NPs) in diabetic rats. Wound closure was significantly accelerated in rats treated with CAPE-NPs. This was confirmed via histological examinations of skin tissues that indicated expedited healing and enhanced collagen deposition. This was accompanied by observed antioxidant activity as evidenced by the prevention of lipid peroxidation and the exhaustion of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities. In addition, CAPE-NPs showed superior anti-inflammatory activity as compared with the regular formula of CAPE, as they prevented the expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) as well as tumor necrosis-alpha (TNF-α). The pro-collagen actions of CAPE-NPs were highlighted by the enhanced hyroxyproline content and up-regulation of Col 1A1 mRNA expression. Furthermore, the immunohistochemial assessment of skin tissues indicated that CAPE-NPs enhance proliferation and angiogenesis, as shown by the increased expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) and platelet-derived growth factor subunit B (PDGF-B). In conclusion, CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA nanoparticles possess potent healing effects in diabetic wounds. This is mediated, at least partially, by its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and pro-collagen as well as angiogenic activities.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common metabolic disorder in developed and developing countries due to several risk factors such as speedy urbanization, obesity, and sedentary lifestyles [1]. Unfortunately, DM poses a heavy economic, social, and health burden [2,3]. Its complications include cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases, as well as nephropathy and retinopathy [4]. In addition, delayed wound healing is one of the serious diabetic complications as DM is the main reason for foot amputation [5]. The wound repair process is highly complicated and involves a sequence of molecular and cellular events [6]. In diabetes, delayed healing has been attributed to the enhanced release of inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α [7], compromised collagen formation [8], the release of growth factors such as TGF-β [9], and angiogenesis [10]. The wound healing process comprises three main stages, namely, the hemostatic, inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling stages [11]. The standard care of diabetic foot includes surgical debridement, dressing, and infection control [12]. Furthermore, it involves the use of several re-purposed drugs that help to expedite the healing process, such as statins, phenytoin, metformin, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine [13,14,15]. In addition, natural products such as herbal-based dressings and oils have been tried due to their diverse pharmacological activities and excellent safety profiles [16].
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is a main active constituent of honeybee propolis, which has been used for hundreds of years in folk medicine [17]. CAPE is a polyphenol compound with a catechol skeleton [18]. It has been shown to retain potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [19]. Furthermore, it has potent antibacterial effects [20,21] and antiviral activities [22]. This is in addition to its hepatoprotective [23,24], renoprotective [25,26], neuroprotective [27] and cardioprotective effects [19,28]. In addition, CAPE has been shown to promote the wound healing of pressure ulcers via modulating NF-κB, NOS2, and NRF2 expression [29]. It expedited the healing of mechanical nasal mucosa in rats [30] and surgically created calvarial defects in the parietal bone [31]. Furthermore, CAPE accelerated epithelium development and cutaneous healing in a rat skin wound excision model. This was confirmed histologically and was associated with significant antioxidant activity [32]. However, the medical use of CAPE is hindered by its poor water solubility and limited plasma stability with subsequent rapid clearance and low bioavailability [33]. Several attempts have been made to formulate CAPE in nano-particle preparations so as to enhance its pharmacological activities [34,35,36]. Furthermore, the wound dressing of CAPE-loaded electrospun nanofibers was shown to be biocompatible and have enhanced healing activity [37]. Indeed, PEG–PLGA copolymers that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have sparked interest due to their capacity to generate a variety of NPs [38,39]. PEG–PLGA copolymers in particular are self-assembled copolymers that have amphipathic activity in water. Furthermore, PEG–PLGA NPs are biocompatible with perfect biodegradability, with a core design that is appropriate for containing active compounds with limited water solubility and an exterior hydrophilic corona that serves as an interface between the external medium and the core [39,40]. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the ability of CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA nanoparticles to expedite the healing of excised wounds in diabetic rats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

CAPE > 98% was purchased from Xi’An, Julong Bio-Teck Company (Xi’An, China). Streptozotocin (STZ), polyethylene glycol-co-poly lactide-co-glycolide (PEG–PLGA) with average molecular weights of 2000 and 11,500 for PEG and PLGA, respectively, and lactide:glycolide 1:1, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), acetone, and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Animals

Male Wistar rats (210–240 g) were obtained from the vivarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy. The animals were kept in an air-conditioned facility (a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C and humidity of 60–70%) with a dark/light cycle of 12 h:12 h with free access to tap water and standard food pellets. Animal handling procedures and protocol were permitted by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Faculty of Pharmacy, KAU, Saudi Arabia (Reference # PH-1443-73).

2.3. Preparation of CAPE-NPs

The previously described technique was used to create CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA NPs [14]. In a summary, 10% w/w CAPE and PEG–PLGA were dissolved in acetone before the organic solution was added gradually to an aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) that contained 0.5% w/v PEG–PLGA. The dispersion underwent probe sonication for one minute after being agitated for six hours at room temperature to completely remove the organic solvent. The created NPs were centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The separated NPs were redispersed, and any free CAPE or extra PVA was removed by centrifuging them twice in Milli-Q water. The CAPE–NPs were lyophilized using mannitol (5% w/v) as a cryoprotectant. With a few minor adjustments, CAPE-loaded hydrogel and CAPE self-assembled PEG–PLGA-loaded hydrogel were created. In brief, lyophilized CAPE self-assembled PEG–PLGA powder or its equivalent in raw CAPE was dispersed in double-distilled water. HPMC at a concentration of 1.5% was added to the aqueous dispersion. Prior to further usage, the gels were stored at 4 °C for 24 h. CAPE or its equivalent nanoformula was present in the hydrogel at a concentration of 2% w/w.

2.4. Characterization of CAPE-NPs’ Size

The size of the CAPE-NPs was measured using the Zetasizer (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Before analysis, the samples were diluted in deionized water. Measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.5. Evaluation of CAPE-PEG–PLGA Loading Capacity

CAPE loading was determined in the prepared CAPE-PEG–PLGA by dissolving a known excess amount of CAPE in 1 g of plain PEG–PLGA separately. The mixture was kept at 25  ±  2  °C for 24 h in a shaking water bath. This was followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min. The precipitates were collected, washed, and dispersed in methanol. Then, the drug was extracted, and the amount of CAPE was determined using the previously mentioned HPLC method [41]. The detection wavelength was set at 325 nm. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The column temperature was 25  °C. The drug loading capacity was determined using the following equation:
CAPE   loading   capacity = CAPE   content   in   the   prepared   CAPE PEG PLGA   mg Total   weight   mg   ×   100

2.6. In Vitro CAPE Release Study

The in vitro release of CAPE was performed using a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off of 12,000 Da. Briefly, the CAPE-NPs were introduced into the dialysis bag, tied, and immersed in the release medium. The release medium consisted of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 6.8 (500 mL) containing Tween 80 (0.5%). The system was maintained at 37 °C in a shaking water bath. The samples were withdrawn at time points of 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and analyzed for CAPE content with the HPLC method [41].

2.7. Experimental Design

Hyperglycemia was induced via a single i.p. injection of streptozotocin (STZ) in a citrate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.5) at 55 mg/kg for each rat after 18 hours of fasting [42]. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was measured daily using a glucometer for two weeks after the STZ injection, and only animals with sustained FBG higher than 250 mg/dL were included. For the chosen diabetic animals, FBG was monitored once weekly over the course of the experiment. To induce wounds, diabetic rats were i.p. injected with ketamine/xylazine at a dose of 50/5 mg/kg, respectively [43]. Subsequently, the skin of each rat at the dorsal surface was exposed by shaving and sterilized with an antiseptic iodine solution. After that, an excision circle of 1 cm diameter was made on each rat’s dorsal surface, followed by disinfection. A local anesthetic of lidocaine-HCl (2%) and 1:80,000 epinephrine was injected subcutaneously (4.4 mg/kg) adjacent to the wound area instantly after excision to lessen pain.
Wounded diabetic rats were then divided into 5 groups (10 in each): Group (1) comprised untreated control rats with no treatment; Group (2) received the topical vehicle used in the preparation of the CAPE-NPs on the wound area; Group (3) received a topical application of CAPE-raw prepared in hydrogel on the wound area (0.5 g); Group (4) received a topical application of CAPE-NPs, and Group (5) comprised positive control rats treated with the commercial ointment Mebo® (Gulf Pharmaceutical Industries, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE) on the wound area. The ointment contained β-sitosterol as the main active ingredient. All treatments were topically applied (0.5 g) on a daily basis for 14 days. Wounds were covered with sterile dressings that were changed every day. Under current experimental conditions, wound diameters (WD) were measured, and the wounds were photographed on day 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14. On day 7, 4 animals/group were sacrificed by decapitation, and the skins of the wound areas were dissected out and fixed in 10% neutral formalin. On day 14, the rest of the animals in all groups were sacrificed, and the skins of the wound areas were dissected out. Part of the skin obtained from each animal was fixed in 10% formalin. The remaining part was kept at −80 °C. For homogenization, skin tissues were carefully washed with ice-cold saline and softly dried using filter papers. Then, homogenates were prepared in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 100 mM, pH 7.4)

2.8. Assessment of Wound Contraction

The percentage of wound contraction was computed from the difference in wound diameter (WD) between days 0 and 14, according to the formula [44]
Wound   contraction   %   = Day   0   WD Day   14   WD Day   0   WD × 100

2.9. Histopathology

Skin tissues collected from wounded areas on days 7 and 14 were fixed in neutral formalin (10 %) for 24 h. This was followed by the preparation of a paraffin block and sectioning at 5 µm thickness. Some sections were stained with H&E and the remaining were stained with Masson’s trichrome (MT) specific to collagen fibers [45]. Additional sections were kept unstained on positively charged slides for subsequent immunohistochemical studies.

2.10. Biochemical Analyses

MDA tissue concentration as well as the enzymatic activities of SOD and CAT were determined using commercially available biochemical kits, based on the manufacturer’s instructions (Biodiagnostic, Giza, Egypt). The skin content of hydroxyproline was measured with a specific ELISA kit (Cat. # MBS726071, MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein content in skin tissue homogenates was assessed using a colorimetric BCA protein assay kit (Cat. #23227), purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific® (Vienna, Austria).

2.11. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

An ultrasonic probe was utilized to homogenize skin tissues, followed by RNA extraction with a nucleic acid extraction kit (NucleoSpin®, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Duerin, Germany). The purity expressed as a A260/A280 ratio along with RNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically. Reverse transcription was accomplished using a commercially available reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR amplification reactions were performed using a Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) coupled to the primers shown in Table 1. Data were expressed in the cycle threshold (Ct). The PCR datasheet included the Ct values of the assessed gene (Collagen 1A1) and the housekeeping gene (GAPDH). The relative quantitation (RQ) was quantified according to the calculation of delta-delta Ct (ΔΔCt).

2.12. Assessment of IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β1, and PDGFRα, Immunohistochemically

Skin sections were first blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (in TBS) for 120 min, then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the specified primary antibodies (1:500): mouse monoclonal antibodies to TNF-α Cat. # (ab220210) and IL-6 Cat. # (ab9324), rabbit monoclonal antibody to TGF-β1 Cat. # (ab215715), and rabbit polyclonal antibody to PDGFRβ Cat.# (ab51046). All antibodies were purchased from Abcam, Cambridge, UK. Next to washing, slides were then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 90 min. Sections were then stained with 0.02% DAB reagent containing 0.01% hydrogen peroxide. A counter stain (hematoxylin) was used, and slides were inspected under a light microscope [46]. Optical density (OD) was determined using image analysis software (ImageJ, 1.48a, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as mean ± (S.D). The statistical difference among means was tested using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. GraphPad Prism software® (version 8.0, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform all analyses. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Particle Size, Polydispersity Index, and Loading Capacity

The CAPE-NPs were created using the nanoprecipitation technique. The CAPE-NPs had an average particle size of 198 ± 7.3 nm (Figure 1) and a polydispersity index of 0.43 ± 0.04. Furthermore, the CAPE loading capacity was found to be 81.73 ± 5.1.

3.2. Assessment of In Vitro CAPE Release

The in vitro release profile of CAPE from the prepared formula in a pH 6.8 phosphate buffer is shown in Figure 2. The release of CAPE was obviously sustained for 48 h. A slight burst release was observed at 2 h, amounting to 24.1 ± 1.8%. This was followed by sustained release of CAPE that reached a cumulative value of 77.8 ± 7.9% and 98.6 ± 10.7% at 24 and 48 h, respectively.

3.3. Effect of CAPE-NPs on Wound Contraction

As shown in Figure 3A, the untreated group and vehicle-treated group, CAPE-raw formulation, CAPE-NP formulation, and positive control formulation had open wounds on day 0. However, on days 3, 7, 10, and 14, the topical application of the CAPE-NPs exhibited an obvious and significant enhancement in wound contraction followed by the marketed formulation (positive control) and CAPE-raw formulation. It is noteworthy that the diabetic rats treated with the CAPE-NPs exhibited a wound contradiction of 97% on day 14 (Figure 3B).

3.4. Effect of CAPE-NPs on Histological Changes of Wounded Skin (H&E and MT Staining)

Figure 4 indicates that the epidermal layer of the untreated and vehicle-treated rat skins displayed obvious focal hyperkeratosis and acanthosis. In addition, the dermal layer showed an increased deposition of collagen fibers along with scattered inflammatory cell infiltration. However, animals treated with the CAPE-raw and CAPE-NPs showed marked reductions in histopathological as well as inflammatory changes. These cells were identified morphologically by their small size and basophilic cytoplasm as well as rounded nuclei. It was obvious that the CAPE-NP-treated animals showed the highest degree of collagen deposition, as indicated by blue coloration in MT-stained sections with scattered areas reaching advanced phases of wound healing.

3.5. Effect of CAPE-NPs on Antioxidant Status

Figure 5A indicates that skin specimens collected from the untreated and vehicle-treated animals showed a significantly higher content of the lipid peroxidation marker MDA. However, the CAPE-NP group showed potent activity in inhibiting MDA in comparison with all the other groups. In addition, surgical wounding in diabetic rats was accompanied by a significant reduction in SOD and CAT enzymatic activity. Nevertheless, treatment with CAPE-raw, CAPE-NPs, and the commercial positive control significantly enhanced SOD activity by 28.6, 59.5, and 39.3%, respectively, as compared with the untreated group (Figure 5B). Similarly, CAT activity was significantly enhanced by 31.3% and 20.2% for the CAPE-NP and the positive control groups, respectively, in comparison with the untreated animals (Figure 5C).

3.6. Impact of CAPE-NPs on Inflammatory Markers

The assessments of IL-6 and TNF-α expression indicated that the untreated group as well as the vehicle-treated group showed the highest elevations of both markers. However, the application of CAPE-Raw, CAPE-NPs, and the positive control expedited the inflammatory phase and significantly reduced the expression of its markers. The CAPE-NP and positive control groups showed the highest inhibitory potencies, as IL-6 expression was 63.7 and 71.9%, respectively, as compared with the untreated control group. Similarly, the CAPE-NP and positive control rats showed TNF-α expressions as low as 65.4% and 77.1% of the untreated animals, respectively (Figure 6).

3.7. Effect of CAPE-NPs on Markers of Collagen Formation

The application of the CAPE-raw or CAPE-NPs formulations significantly increased the hydroxyproline content by 51.3% and 113.6%, respectively, as compared with the untreated group (Figure 7A). Likewise, both preparations significantly up-regulated the mRNA of Col1A1 by 180% and 230%, respectively, as compared with the untreated animals (Figure 7B).

3.8. Impact of CAPE-NPs on Expression of TGF-β1 and PDGF-B

As depicted in Figure 8, the treatment of diabetic rats with CAP-NPs significantly enhanced TGF-β1 expression in comparison with the untreated, vehicle-treated, and CAPE-raw groups, by 110.8, 81.4, and 22.0%, respectively. In addition, PDGFR-β was significantly enhanced by the application of CAP-NPs by 115.8%, as compared with untreated animals. It is noteworthy to report that the CAPE-NP group was superior to the positive control group in enhancing PDGFR-β expression by 20.0%.

4. Discussion

Delayed wound healing is a main sign of diabetes and may lead to chronic infection, diabetic ulcers, or even limb amputation [47]. The successes of currently available topical medications are unsatisfactory, and the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers is still relatively high [48]. CAPE is an active constituent of honeybee propolis and possesses a plethora of appealing pharmacological activities [17]. The application of nanotechnology in the pharmaceutical sector has received more attention in recent years. New biodegradable self-assembled NPs of the PEG–PLGA amphiphilic diblock copolymer based on CAPE were prepared in the current work. The most popular nanocarriers for the administration of a range of drugs are biocompatible nanocarriers, notably biodegradable nanoparticles [49]. The assessment of the release of CAPE indicated that complete release needs more than 24 h. Thus, it can be concluded that the polymeric micelles formed on the PEG–PLGA block copolymer provided a platform that could sustain CAPE for more than 24 h. The entrapment of the hydrophobic CAPE in the PLGA core could be credited to its strong drug-sustaining behavior [50]. These data are in line with previous reports on PEG–PLGA-based formulae [51]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of CAPE-loaded biodegradable PEG–PLGA NPs to enhance wound healing in diabetic rats. Our data indicated that CAPE-NPs significantly expedited the rate of wound healing in diabetic rats as compared with CAPE-raw and a commercially available preparation. This was confirmed by our histological findings that indicated an enhanced proportion of wounded skin in phase III healing with reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and increased collagen deposition. This is consistent with previous reports highlighting the ability of CAPE to accelerate cutaneous healing in normoglycemic rats [32]. The observed enhancement in healing activity with the nano-CAPE preparation is in line with the accumulating literature highlighting the advantages of using nanotechnology in topical drug delivery. These include the sustainable and controlled release of encapsulated active ingredients for a desired period until wound healing [52,53]. In addition, nanoparticles confer better interactions and penetration at the wound sites, making them excellent at tackling the complexity of diabetic wound healing [54,55].
Excessive oxidative stress and a decreased antioxidant ability of skin tissues are major contributors to non-healing diabetic wounds [56]. In this study, CAPE in both raw and nano preparations exhibited potent antioxidant activity as evidenced by its inhibition of accumulation of lipid peroxidation products and exhaustion of SOD and CAT activities. This is supported by the reported antioxidant actions of CAPE [57,58,59]. This has been attributed to the chemical structure of CAPE, which chelates transitional metals and stabilizes free radicals [60]. This is in line with the current recommendations for the use of molecules with antioxidant activity to accelerate diabetic wound healing [61]. In particular, bionanomaterials have found an important place in the management of diabetic wound healing [62].
Prolonged inflammation has been suggested as a major player in the pathogenesis of delayed wound healing [63,64]. Inflammatory mediators adversely affect growth factor expression and fibroblasts’ function [65]. In the current study, delayed wound healing in diabetic animals was associated with enhanced expressions of IL-6 and TNF-α. Fortunately, CAPE in both formulations significantly down-regulated their expressions. This is supported by several studies reporting the anti-inflammatory properties of CAPE [66,67,68]. Moreover, CAPE’s anti-inflammatory activities have been previously implicated in burn healing in rats [69]. In addition, several studies indicated that the delayed healing of diabetic wounds is associated with decreased collagen deposition independent of glycemic control [70]. In line with this suggestion, our data showed that untreated wounds had a decreased content of hydroxyproline together with a down-regulation of Col 1A1 mRNA expression. The beneficial effects of CAPE were associated with pro-collagen activities. These findings gain support by the previous study that highlighted the pro-collagen properties of CAPE as indicated by the accumulation of hydroxyproline in burn wounds [69]. This is also in harmony with previous histological studies that indicated that CAPE accelerates cutaneous wound healing via enhancing collagen deposition [32].
Growth factors play a vital role in wound healing by regulating cellular proliferation and differentiation [71]. Unfortunately, the production of several growth factors responsible for initiating and sustaining the healing process is impaired in diabetes [13]. Experimental studies showed that the application of TGF-β administered in a collagen gel increased the healing of incisional wounds [72]. Our data indicated a decreased expression of TGF-β in tissues collected from diabetic untreated wound tissues. On the other hand, the application of the CAPE formulae resulted in an enhancement in TGF-β expression. This supports the observed collagen deposition and enhanced wound healing. In addition, it has been reported that the inflammatory phase is characterized by the moving of fibroblasts and the release of a variety of angiogenic growth factors at the location of the wound by keratinocytes [73]. A key reason for many non-healing wounds is inhibited angiogenesis. Therefore, several strategies have been adopted to enhance angiogenesis in wound healing [74]. In this study, CAPE’s healing activity was associated with an increased expression of PDGFR-β. Several experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the role of the angiogenic growth factor PDGF [75,76]. This possible role of CAPE in promoting the biosynthesis of extra-cellular matrix, epithelization, and angiogenesis has been previously described [17]. In conclusion, CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA nanoparticles possess potent healing effects in diabetic wounds. This is mediated, at least partially, by their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, pro-collagen, and angiogenic activities.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, CAPE-loaded PEG–PLGA nanoparticles possess potent healing effects in diabetic wounds. This is mediated, at least partially, by their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, pro-collagen, and angiogenic activities.

Funding

This project was funded by the Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. (IFPRC-150-166-2020). Therefore, the author gratefully acknowledges the technical and financial support from the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Faculty of Pharmacy’s Research Ethics Committee, King Abdulaziz University (Reference # PH-1443-73).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available within the article or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. (IFPRC-150-166-2020). Therefore, the author gratefully acknowledges the technical and financial support from the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In addition, I am grateful to Gamal Abdel Aziz of the Department of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University for his help in the histological studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam, S.; Hasan, M.K.; Neaz, S.; Hussain, N.; Hossain, M.F.; Rahman, T. Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from Epidemiology, Biochemistry, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Complications and Comprehensive Management. Diabetology 2021, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oh, S.H.; Ku, H.; Park, K.S. Prevalence and Socioeconomic Burden of Diabetes Mellitus in South Korean Adults: A Population-Based Study Using Administrative Data. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Naeem, Z. Burden of Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Health Sci. 2015, 9, V–VI. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dilworth, L.; Facey, A.; Omoruyi, F. Diabetes Mellitus and Its Metabolic Complications: The Role of Adipose Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bennett, J. Limb Loss: The Unspoken Psychological Aspect. J. Vasc. Nurs. 2016, 34, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gonzalez, A.C.D.O.; Andrade, Z.D.A.; Costa, T.F.; Medrado, A.R.A.P. Wound Healing—A Literature Review. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2016, 91, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wetzler, C.; Kampfer, H.; Stallmeyer, B.; Pfeilschifter, J.; Frank, S. Large and Sustained Induction of Chemokines during Impaired Wound Healing in the Genetically Diabetic Mouse: Prolonged Persistence of Neutrophils and Macrophages during the Late Phase of Repair. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2000, 115, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chakraborty, R.; Borah, P.; Dutta, P.P.; Sen, S. Evolving Spectrum of Diabetic Wound: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Targets. World J. Diabetes 2022, 13, 696–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roberts, A.B. Transforming Growth Factor-Beta: Activity and Efficacy in Animal Models of Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1995, 3, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caballero, S.; Sengupta, N.; Afzal, A.; Chang, K.H.; Li Calzi, S.; Guberski, D.L.; Kern, T.S.; Grant, M.B. Ischemic Vascular Damage Can Be Repaired by Healthy, but Not Diabetic, Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Diabetes 2007, 56, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Velnar, T.; Bailey, T.; Smrkolj, V. The Wound Healing Process: An Overview of the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. J. Int. Med. Res. 2009, 37, 1528–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Everett, E.; Mathioudakis, N. Update on Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1411, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Spampinato, S.F.; Caruso, G.I.; De Pasquale, R.; Sortino, M.A.; Merlo, S. The Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing in Diabetes: Looking among Old Drugs. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Asfour, H.Z.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Ahmed, O.A.A.; Fahmy, U.A.; El-moselhy, M.A.; Rizg, W.Y.; Alghaith, A.F.; Eid, B.G.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Amitriptyline-Based Biodegradable PEG-PLGA Self-Assembled Nanoparticles Accelerate Cutaneous Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alhakamy, N.A.; Caruso, G.; Privitera, A.; Ahmed, O.A.A.; Fahmy, U.A.; Md, S.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Eid, B.G.; Abdel-Naim, A.B.; et al. Fluoxetine Ecofriendly Nanoemulsion Enhances Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats: In Vivo Efficacy Assessment. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nikam, A.; Thomas, A.; Giram, P.; Nagore, D.; Chitlange, S. Herbal-Based Dressings in Wound Management. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2022, 18, e010422202937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Olgierd, B.; Kamila, Ż.; Anna, B.; Emilia, M. The Pluripotent Activities of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester. Molecules 2021, 26, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5281787, Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Caffeic_acid_phenethyl_ester (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  19. Tolba, M.F.; Azab, S.S.; Khalifa, A.E.; Abdel-Rahman, S.Z.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester, a Promising Component of Propolis with a Plethora of Biological Activities: A Review on Its Anti-Inflammatory, Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, and Cardioprotective Effects. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Niu, Y.; Wang, K.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Q.; Li, H.; Ding, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, L. Antibacterial Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Cariogenic Bacteria and Streptococcus Mutans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00251-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arasoglu, T.; Derman, S.; Mansuroglu, B. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and PLGA Nanoparticle Formulation by Different Methods. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 025103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erdemli, H.; Akyol, S.; Armutcu, F.; Akyol, O. Antiviral Properties of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and Its Potential Application. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 4, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Albukhari, A.A.; Gashlan, H.M.; El-Beshbishy, H.A.; Nagy, A.A.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Protects against Tamoxifen-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 1689–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shao, B.; Wang, M.; Chen, A.; Zhang, C.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, A. Protective Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester against Imidacloprid-Induced Hepatotoxicity by Attenuating Oxidative Stress, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Inflammation and Apoptosis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 164, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kobroob, A.; Chattipakorn, N.; Wongmekiat, O. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Ameliorates Cadmium-Induced Kidney Mitochondrial Injury. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2012, 200, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aygün, F.Ö.; Akçam, F.Z.; Kaya, O.; Ceyhan, B.M.; Sütçü, R. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Modulates Gentamicin-Induced Oxidative Nephrotoxicity in Kidney of Rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 145, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balaha, M.; De Filippis, B.; Cataldi, A.; Di Giacomo, V. CAPE and Neuroprotection: A Review. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bıçakçı, N.; Karaboğa; Dökmeci, A.H.; Güzel, S.; Fidanol Erboğa, Z. Cardioprotective Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Cardiac Contusion Following Blunt Chest Trauma in Rats. Biotech. Histochem. 2019, 94, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Romana-Souza, B.; dos Santos, J.S.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Promotes Wound Healing of Mice Pressure Ulcers Affecting NF-ΚB, NOS2 and NRF2 Expression. Life Sci. 2018, 207, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kinis, V.; Ozbay, M.; Akdag, M.; Alabalik, U.; Gul, A.; Yilmaz, B.; Ozkan, H.; Topcu, I. Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing of Nasal Mucosa in the Rat: An Experimental Study. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2014, 35, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kazancioglu, H.O.; Bereket, M.C.; Ezirganli, S.; Aydin, M.S.; Aksakalli, S. Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing in Calvarial Defects. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2015, 73, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Serarslan, G.; Altuǧ, E.; Kontas, T.; Atik, E.; Avci, G. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Accelerates Cutaneous Wound Healing in a Rat Model and Decreases Oxidative Stress. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2007, 32, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Celli, N.; Dragani, L.K.; Murzilli, S.; Pagliani, T.; Poggi, A. In Vitro and in Vivo Stability of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester, a Bioactive Compound of Propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3398–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Derman, S. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles: Effect of Various Process Parameters on Reaction Yield, Encapsulation Efficiency, and Particle Size. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 341848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tambuwala, M.M.; Khan, M.N.; Thompson, P.; McCarron, P.A. Albumin Nano-Encapsulation of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and Piceatannol Potentiated Its Ability to Modulate HIF and NF-KB Pathways and Improves Therapeutic Outcome in Experimental Colitis. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2019, 9, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Shahin, N.N.; Shamma, R.N.; Ahmed, I.S. A Nano-Liposomal Formulation of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Modulates Nrf2 and NF-Κβ Signaling and Alleviates Experimentally Induced Acute Pancreatitis in a Rat Model. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaya, S.; Yilmaz, D.E.; Akmayan, I.; Egri, O.; Arasoglu, T.; Derman, S. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for Wound Dressing Application. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 111, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, S.; Cheng, S.X.; Zhuo, R.X. Self-Assembly Strategy for the Preparation of Polymer-Based Nanoparticles for Drug and Gene Delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 576–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abourehab, M.A.S.; Ahmed, O.A.A.; Balata, G.F.; Almalki, W.H. Self-Assembled Biodegradable Polymeric Micelles to Improve Dapoxetine Delivery across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 3679–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ashjari, M.; Khoee, S.; Mahdavian, A.R.; Rahmatolahzadeh, R. Self-Assembled Nanomicelles Using PLGA-PEG Amphiphilic Block Copolymer for Insulin Delivery: A Physicochemical Investigation and Determination of CMC Values. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 943–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Bowman, P.D.; Kerwin, S.M.; Stavchansky, S. Stability of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and Its Fluorinated Derivative in Rat Plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2007, 21, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. King, A.J.F. The Use of Animal Models in Diabetes Research. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 877–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Struck, M.B.; Andrutis, K.A.; Ramirez, H.E.; Battles, A.H. Effect of a Short-Term Fast on Ketamine-Xylazine Anesthesia in Rats. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2011, 50, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Koshak, A.E.; Algandaby, M.M.; Mujallid, M.I.; Abdel-Naim, A.B.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Fahmy, U.A.; Alfarsi, A.; Badr-Eldin, S.M.; Neamatallah, T.; Nasrullah, M.Z.; et al. Wound Healing Activity of Opuntia Ficus-Indica Fixed Oil Formulated in a Self-Nanoemulsifying Formulation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 3889–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bancroft, J.D.; Gamble, M. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 6th ed.; Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier: Beijing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Buchwalow, I.B.; Böcker, W. Immuno-Histochemistry Basics and Methods; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-04608-7. [Google Scholar]
  47. da Fonseca Cerqueira, M.M.B.; Maia, H.M.S.F.; das Mercês, M.C.; Santos da Natividade, M.; dos Santos Almeida, O.; Santana, E.F.; Oliveira, B.A.M.; Araújo, M. Complications Related to Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Associated Social Vulnerability Factors at a Referral Centre in Brazil. J. Wound Care 2022, 31, 946–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tindong, M.; Palle, J.N.; Nebongo, D.; Aminde, L.N.; Mboue-Djieka, Y.; Mbarga, N.T.F.; Dehayem, M.Y.; Choukem, S.P. Prevalence, Clinical Presentation, and Factors Associated With Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Two Regional Hospitals in Cameroon. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2018, 17, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Jong, W.H.; Borm, P.J.A. Drug Delivery and Nanoparticles:Applications and Hazards. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhang, K.; Tang, X.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, B.; Yang, H.; He, H. PEG-PLGA Copolymers: Their Structure and Structure-Influenced Drug Delivery Applications. J. Control. Release 2014, 183, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alhakamy, N.A.; Ahmed, O.A.A.; Fahmy, U.A.; Md, S. Development and In Vitro Evaluation of 2-Methoxyestradiol Loaded Polymeric Micelles for Enhancing Anticancer Activities in Prostate Cancer. Polymers 2021, 13, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jackson, J.E.; Kopecki, Z.; Cowin, A.J. Nanotechnological Advances in Cutaneous Medicine. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 808234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Goyal, R.; Macri, L.K.; Kaplan, H.M.; Kohn, J. Nanoparticles and Nanofibers for Topical Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release 2016, 240, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Andreu, V.; Mendoza, G.; Arruebo, M.; Irusta, S. Smart Dressings Based on Nanostructured Fibers Containing Natural Origin Antimicrobial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Regenerative Compounds. Materials 2015, 8, 5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Korrapati, P.S.; Karthikeyan, K.; Satish, A.; Krishnaswamy, V.R.; Venugopal, J.R.; Ramakrishna, S. Recent Advancements in Nanotechnological Strategies in Selection, Design and Delivery of Biomolecules for Skin Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 67, 747–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sanchez, M.C.; Lancel, S.; Boulanger, E.; Neviere, R. Targeting Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Ramazan Yilmaz, H.; Uz, E.; Yucel, N.; Altuntas, I.; Ozcelik, N. Protective Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) on Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Diabetic Rat Liver. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2004, 18, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tolba, M.F.; Omar, H.A.; Azab, S.S.; Khalifa, A.E.; Abdel-Naim, A.B.; Abdel-Rahman, S.Z. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester: A Review of Its Antioxidant Activity, Protective Effects against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Drug Adverse Reactions. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2183–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lv, L.; Cui, H.; Ma, Z.; Liu, X.; Yang, L. Recent Progresses in the Pharmacological Activities of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 2021, 394, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Göçer, H.; Gülçin, I. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE): Correlation of Structure and Antioxidant Properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deng, L.; Du, C.; Song, P.; Chen, T.; Rui, S.; Armstrong, D.G.; Deng, W. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Diabetic Wound Healing. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 8852759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Xiong, Y.; Panayi, A.C.; Abududilibaier, A.; Hu, Y.; Yu, C.; Zhou, W.; Sun, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. Antioxidant Therapy and Antioxidant-Related Bionanomaterials in Diabetic Wound Healing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Salazar, J.J.; Ennis, W.J.; Koh, T.J. Diabetes Medications: Impact on Inflammation and Wound Healing. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2016, 30, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leal, E.C.; Carvalho, E. Heme Oxygenase-1 as Therapeutic Target for Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ochoa, O.; Torres, F.M.; Shireman, P.K. Chemokines and Diabetic Wound Healing. Vascular 2007, 15, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Al-Hariri, M.; Alsunni, A.; Shaikh, M.H.; Eldin, T.G.; Ghamdi, K.A.; Alharbi, A.F.; Alhawaj, H.; Chathoth, S. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Reduces Pro Inflammatory Cytokines in Moderate Swimming Test in Growing Rats Model. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 5653–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Semis, H.S.; Gur, C.; Ileriturk, M.; Kaynar, O.; Kandemir, F.M. Investigation of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester in a Model of λ-Carrageenan-Induced Paw Edema in Rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021, 40, S721–S738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Pandurangan, A.K.; Mohebali, N.; Hasanpourghadi, M.; Esa, N.M. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Attenuates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Through Modulation of NF-ΚB and Cell Adhesion Molecules. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dos Santos, J.S.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Improves Burn Healing in Rats through Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects. J. Burn Care Res. 2013, 34, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Black, E.; Vibe-Petersen, J.; Jorgensen, L.N.; Madsen, S.M.; Ågren, M.S.; Holstein, P.E.; Perrild, H.; Gottrup, F. Decrease of Collagen Deposition in Wound Repair in Type 1 Diabetes Independent of Glycemic Control. Arch. Surg. 2003, 138, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Dinh, T.; Braunagel, S.; Rosenblum, B.I. Growth Factors in Wound Healing: The Present and the Future? Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2015, 32, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mustoe, T.A.; Pierce, G.F.; Thomason, A.; Gramates, P.; Sporn, M.B.; Deuel, T.F. Accelerated Healing of Incisional Wounds in Rats Induced by Transforming Growth Factor-Beta. Science 1987, 237, 1333–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. den Dekker, A.; Davis, F.M.; Kunkel, S.L.; Gallagher, K.A. Targeting Epigenetic Mechanisms in Diabetic Wound Healing. Transl. Res. 2019, 204, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Veith, A.P.; Henderson, K.; Spencer, A.; Sligar, A.D.; Baker, A.B. Therapeutic Strategies for Enhancing Angiogenesis in Wound Healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 97–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pierce, G.F.; Mustoe, T.A.; Senior, R.M.; Reed, J.; Griffin, G.L.; Thomason, A.; Deuel, T.F. In Vivo Incisional Wound Healing Augmented by Platelet-Derived Growth Factor and Recombinant c-Sis Gene Homodimeric Proteins. J. Exp. Med. 1988, 167, 974–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Steed, D.L.; the Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. Clinical Evaluation of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Diabetic Ulcers. J. Vasc. Surg. 1995, 21, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy image of CAPE-PEG–PLGA NPs showing their particle size.
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy image of CAPE-PEG–PLGA NPs showing their particle size.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g001
Figure 2. In vitro release of CAPE from CAPE-PEG–PLGA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C, pH 6.8 containing Tween 80 (0.5%) as a solubilizer.
Figure 2. In vitro release of CAPE from CAPE-PEG–PLGA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C, pH 6.8 containing Tween 80 (0.5%) as a solubilizer.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g002
Figure 3. (A) Effects of CAPE-NPs on wound healing and % wound contraction on days 0,3,7,10, and 14. (B) Graphic presentation of wound contraction at day 14.Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  <  0.05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  <  0.05.
Figure 3. (A) Effects of CAPE-NPs on wound healing and % wound contraction on days 0,3,7,10, and 14. (B) Graphic presentation of wound contraction at day 14.Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  <  0.05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  <  0.05.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g003
Figure 4. Effects of CAPE-NPs on skin histological changes. (A) H&E staining and (B) MT staining.
Figure 4. Effects of CAPE-NPs on skin histological changes. (A) H&E staining and (B) MT staining.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g004
Figure 5. Effects of CAPE-NPs on oxidative status markers (A) MDA, (B) SOD, and (C) CAT. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  <  0.05.
Figure 5. Effects of CAPE-NPs on oxidative status markers (A) MDA, (B) SOD, and (C) CAT. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  <  0.05.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g005
Figure 6. Effects of CAPE-NPs on the expression of (A) IL-6 and (B) TNF-α. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, and (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05.
Figure 6. Effects of CAPE-NPs on the expression of (A) IL-6 and (B) TNF-α. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, and (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g006
Figure 7. Effect of CAPE-NPs on skin content of hydroxyproline (A) and mRNA expression of Col 1A1 (B) in diabetic rat wounds on day 14. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  < 0 .05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  <  0.05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  < 0 .05.
Figure 7. Effect of CAPE-NPs on skin content of hydroxyproline (A) and mRNA expression of Col 1A1 (B) in diabetic rat wounds on day 14. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  < 0 .05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  <  0.05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  <  0.05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  < 0 .05.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g007
Figure 8. Effect of CAPE-NPs on TGF-β (upper row), and PDGF-B (lower row) expression in diabetic rat skin wounds on day 14. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  < 0 .05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  < 0 .05.
Figure 8. Effect of CAPE-NPs on TGF-β (upper row), and PDGF-B (lower row) expression in diabetic rat skin wounds on day 14. Data are expressed as mean (n = 6) ± SD. (a) Significantly different from untreated control at p  <  0.05, (b) significantly different from vehicle-treated control at p  < 0 .05, (c) significantly different from CAPE-raw at p  < 0 .05, and (d) significantly different from CAPE-NP at p  < 0 .05.
Antioxidants 12 00060 g008
Table 1. The list of primers used for RT-qPCR.
Table 1. The list of primers used for RT-qPCR.
ForwardReverseAccession Number
Col1A1ATCAGCCCAAACCCCAAGGAGACGCAGGAAGGTCAGCTGGATAGNM_053304.1
GAPDHCCATTCTTCCACCTTTGATGCTTGTTGCTGTAGCCATATTCATTGTNM_017008.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nasrullah, M.Z. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded PEG–PLGA Nanoparticles Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010060

AMA Style

Nasrullah MZ. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded PEG–PLGA Nanoparticles Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nasrullah, Mohammed Z. 2023. "Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Loaded PEG–PLGA Nanoparticles Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats" Antioxidants 12, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop