Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress in Tauopathies: From Cause to Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Grapefruit Flavonoid Naringenin Sex-Dependently Modulates Action Potential in an In Silico Human Ventricular Cardiomyocyte Model
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Functional Powdered Beverages Containing Co-Microcapsules of Sacha Inchi P. huayllabambana Oil and Antioxidant Extracts of Camu Camu and Mango Skins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Quantification of Urinary Microbial Phenolic Metabolites by HPLC-ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap-HRMS and Their Relationship with Dietary Polyphenols in Adolescents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/antiox11081419
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Effect of Herbal Supplements on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Anna Lipert
1,*,
Iwona Szadkowska
1,
Ewelina Matusiak-Wieczorek
1 and
Ewa Kochan
2
1
Department of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Pharmacological Biotechnology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-152 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(8), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081419
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Antioxidants and Cardiovascular Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herbal supplements rich in phenolic compounds are evidenced to have a protective effect against cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, they are suggested to be included in diets for people with hypertension (HT). HT is a global health problem and is estimated to affect billions of people until the end of 2025. For this reason, every possible and effective solution preventing HT should be considered. The aim was to perform an updated meta-analysis and review of recently published studies to evaluate the effect of selected herbal supplements on blood pressure reduction. We searched the PubMed database with specified selection criteria, analysing the RCT studies from 2011 to 2021. A total of 31 studies were included in the analysis, and the meta-analysis was conducted on the data from 16 of them. The general effect size of all the supplements via placebo was d = 1.45, p < 0.05 for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and d = 0.31, p < 0.05 for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The meta-analysis and review of the literature demonstrated that herbal supplements, such as resveratrol, cherry juice, beetroot juice, bergamot extracts, barberry, and pycnogenol, can be effective in blood pressure reduction and cardiovascular prevention, but attention should be paid to their appropriate dosage due to the possibility of side effects from the digestive system.

1. Introduction

According to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), hypertension (HT) is diagnosed if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) is 140 mmHg and over or if the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is 90 mmHg and over [1]. The recommendations of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) take more restrictive values of blood pressure (BP) for the diagnosis of HT. ACC/AHA recommendations define stage 1 hypertension as SBP 130–139 mmHg or DBP 80–89 mmHg, while the European guidelines classify this as high normal BP (130–139/85–89 mmHg) [2].
Although either an elevated systolic or an elevated diastolic blood pressure are the criteria for the diagnosis of HT, more attention is given to SBP as a major risk factor for the increased incidence of cardiac and vascular diseases for people aged 50 and over [3]. According to the current data, every 20-mmHg systolic or 10-mmHg diastolic increase doubles the risk of death from ischemic heart disease and stroke among people aged 40 and over [3,4]. Hypertension [5] is a global health problem affecting about 1 billion people [6], and it is estimated that up to year 2025 it will reach the number of 1.5 billion [7].
There are various recommended strategies to prevent HT, including lifestyle modifications by changing diet and undertaking physical activity or drug interventions [8]. The modifications in diet concern increases in the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables and low-fat dairy products and the reduction of sodium [9,10]. In addition, the use of nutraceuticals supplemented in everyday diets, which can lower BP and may delay or circumvent drug therapy, has received much attention in the literature [8,11,12]. Products recommended in cardiovascular disease prevention are those rich in phenolic compounds that are vital in anti-aging, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-proliferative activities [13,14].
Naturally, phenolics occur in foods such as grapes, wine, grape juice, berries, or pomegranate juice; however, their content strongly depends on cultivation, technology processes, and transformation [15].
Numerous research studies present the effectiveness of the diet alone or in combination with other lifestyle changes in BP decrease across a wide range of BP levels [16] and in the reduction of the risk of other certain chronic diseases [17,18,19]. One of the dietary interventions recognized to be effective in blood pressure reduction is the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet [20], especially in individuals with high sodium intake [21]. There are also several complementary and alternative therapies that include dietary supplements, functional foods, and traditional herbs for treating hypertension [22,23]. The studies confirmed that the positive impact on the level of BP occurs while supplementing potassium [24], chromium [25], or inorganic nitrate products [16]. In the case of the latter, positive effects on BP were usually observed in short-term trials in clinical settings [26].
Although there are many studies analysing the influence of separate phenol-rich products in relation to their protective effects on cardiovascular protective features [27,28], the literature comprehensively presenting the effects of those supplements on BP is sparce. Therefore, the aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the literature from existing randomised controlled trials on phenolic compounds to help quantify the overall effect of them on blood pressure in adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Searching Strategy

There was undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the potential effect of the selected phenolic-rich products on blood pressure response in adults. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) natural plant origin compounds; (b) potentially useful in the fight against high blood pressure. All English-language medical literature, with the time restriction from 2011 to 2021, was searched using the electronic PubMed database. The searching strategy was based on the use of various combinations of keywords with the formula: name of substance + key words (Table S1 as Supplementary Material), including only the randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in apparently healthy humans or those with chronic diseases such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic chronic diseases, atherosclerosis, and heart failure. The articles were excluded because of the following reasons: lack of reference to blood pressure values; lack of supplement level or its administration was together with other supplements; research on cerebrovascular function and cognitive performance; in vitro or animal studies; published only study protocol; studies on patients with pulmonary hypertension, kidney diseases, gynecological diseases, and menopause; access only to the abstract; the articles included non-analysed supplement data. In addition, the exclusion criterion was if research on the supplement discussed its role as (a) an enhancer of endothelial function in response to acute aerobic exercise; (b) a factor regulating gene expression, enzyme activity, oxygen kinetics, and angiogenesis process; (c) a factor reducing pain; (d) a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Figure 1 illustrates a PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process for all of the articles. The study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses normatively [29]. At the time of the protocol submission, the PROSPERO platform was prioritising the registration of COVID-19 protocols, so it was excluded from the registration. To avoid further delay, the current submission passed a basic automated check and was published automatically.
The selected articles had to relate to one of six supplements, such as: resveratrol, pycnogenol, beetroot juice, barberry, bergamot, or cherry juice.
Resveratrol is a poly-phenol, natural stilbene phytoalexin (3, 5, 4′-trihydroxystilbene) synthesized, e.g., in leather grapes, in response to pathogen infections, oxidative stress, and UV radiation. Due to the similarities in chemical structure for synthetic oestrogen (diethylstilbestrol), resveratrol is classified as a phytoestrogen, with plant hormone oestrogen-like action [30]. It occurs in both the cis- and trans-isomer form. In high concentrations, it is also present in wine, mainly red. This compound has a wide range of biological activities, e.g., anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, antioxidant, and anti-cancer. In addition, it protects against cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases and inhibits LDL cholesterol oxidation, platelet aggregation, and angiogenesis [31].
Pycnogenol is a patented product rich in condensed flavonoids extracted from the bark of the French maritime pine tree. It has been shown that pycnogenol has antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activity and inhibits platelet aggregation. There are studies indicating the beneficial effects of pycnogenol supplementation, such as the decrease of blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and the level of urinary albumin [32].
Beetroot juice (BRJ) is a highly-concentrated source of inorganic nitrates in the diet. After ingestion, nitrate (NO3−) is metabolized to bioactive nitrite (NO2−) and then converted into nitric oxide (NO) [33,34]. In the human body, NO is synthesized in various cells via three isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS)—neuronal (nNOS), inducible (iNOS) and endothelial (eNOS). The role of eNOS is the local production of NO as a factor having vasodilatory properties [35]. NO is a principal determinant of normal endothelial and vascular function. In states of inflammation, NO production by the vasculature increases considerably and contributes to oxidative stress [36]. Studies show that the BRJ intake increases NO availability independently on endothelial NO synthesis [35]. The clinical effects of NO include blood pressure reduction and the improvement of blood flow in tissues and organs, which is an important mechanism in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases [37,38].
Barberry is a plant that grows in Asia and Europe. Its fruits, roots, leaves, and flowers are used for medicinal purposes. The traditional use of barberry in folk medicine was detailed in the study of Imenshahidi and Hosseinzadeh [39]. The barberry fruit contains berberine and berberrubine, which have antioxidant properties. What is more, the supplementation of barberry may have a positive effect on the immune system, glucose metabolism, and lipid profiles [40].
Bergamot is a plant growing in Southern Italy. It contains high levels of flavonoids. Bergamot has an anti-inflammatory potential, has a strong effect on lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and glucose tolerance, and it can reduce the sensation of hunger. Bergamot has a positive influence on cardiovascular health, acting as a protector against free radical damage, for example, in the vascular endothelium [41,42].
Cherry juice is a rich source of antioxidants and flavonoids. The supplementation of cherry juice has a beneficial anti-inflammatory effect. What is more, there are also studies indicating that cherry juice can lower systolic BP and LDL cholesterol; thus, it also has a cardioprotective effect [43].
The initial screening phase based on the titles and abstracts was provided to exclude the irrelevant records, animal or in vitro studies, and conference papers to obtain only those relevant, irrespective of where they were conducted and whether they are full text. In addition, the duplicate articles were found and excluded. To assess study eligibility, three co-authors were involved in the literature search, and one of the co-authors was an independent reviewer of the records for inclusion and exclusion criteria of the relevant articles. The primary outcomes of the analyses were mean differences of both SBP and DBP between intervention and control groups; secondary outcomes were mean changes in SBP and DBP between the baseline and final of the intervention or placebo group. Exclusion reasons for most of these studies were that they were conducted on animals or concerned with other diseases, e.g., kidney disease, autism spectrum, rheumatoid arthritis, sleep problems, skin problems, memory and cognitions problems, breast disease, rheumatoid arthritis, visual problems, and haemorrhoids.
The search for RCTs concerning “resveratrol” resulted in 158 articles, including 51 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 32 with “blood pressure”, 10 with “hypertension”, 26 with “endothelial function” (including FMD-flow-mediated dilation or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 35 with “vascular function”, and 4 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 92 articles excluded. There were 48 articles duplicated. The final number of articles for screening was 18. Some articles were excluded after the screening phase because the presentation of the data did not allow for a comparison with other papers. The final number of articles was 5.
The search for RCTs concerning “pycnogenol” resulted in 26 articles, including 6 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 4 with “blood pressure”, 1 with “hypertension”, 23 with “endothelial function” (including FMD—flow-mediated dilation—or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 46 with “vascular function”, and 9 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 21 articles excluded. There were 8 articles duplicated. The final number of articles for screening was 3.
The search for RCTs concerning “beetroot juice” resulted in 248 articles, including 49 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 99 with “blood pressure”, 22 with “arterial hypertension” (except pulmonary HT), 4 with “endothelial function” (including FMD—flow-mediated dilation—or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 8 with “vascular function”, and 3 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 220 articles excluded. There were 135 articles duplicated. The final number of articles for screening was 28. Some articles were excluded after the screening phase because the presentation of the data did not allow for a comparison with other papers. The final number of articles was 16.
The search for RCTs concerning “barberry” resulted in 14 articles, including 7 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 3 with “blood pressure”, 2 with “arterial hypertension” (except pulmonary HT), 1 with “endothelial function” (including FMD—flow-mediated dilation—or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 1 with “vascular function”, and 0 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 13 articles excluded. There were 3 articles duplicated. The final number of articles was 1.
The search for RCTs concerning “bergamot” resulted in 6 articles, including 2 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 2 with “blood pressure”, 1 with “arterial hypertension” (except pulmonary HT), 0 with “endothelial function” (including FMD—flow-mediated dilation—or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 1 with “vascular function”, and 0 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 4 articles excluded. There were 0 articles duplicated. The final number of articles was 2.
The search for RCTs concerning “cherry juice” resulted in 47 articles, including 10 articles combined with “cardiovascular disease”, 14 with “blood pressure”, 6 with “arterial hypertension” (except pulmonary HT), 2 with “endothelial function” (including FMD—flow-mediated dilation—or/and PWV pulse wave velocity), 7 with “vascular function”, and 4 with “arterial stiffness”. After the full text analysis, there were 43 articles excluded. There were 22 articles duplicated. The final number of articles was 4.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted with the use of StatSoft software (version StatSoft version 1.0.67. www.statsoft.pl, accessed on 10 June 2022). The standardized effect size and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to weigh the results of the included studies. Considering acceptable heterogeneity status or homogeneity, the random-effect meta-regression model was used. The statistical significance was considered if p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the Supplements SBP Effectiveness

The analysis of the collected results from the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed a positive effect of the supplements on SBP (d = 1.45 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.96)), with p < 0.05 (Figure 2). The strongest effect on SBP was observed in the research on pycnogenol (d = 3.02 (95% CI −0.46 to 6.49)), which was administered for at least 2 months (Table 1). The strongest effect statistically significant was showed in the Belcaro 2012 study, with p < 0.001 (Figure 2). The next supplements that were noticed to influence SBP were bergamot (d = 1.73 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.32)), with p < 0.001, and beetroot juice (d = 1.34 (95% CI −2.88 to 5.55)) (Figure 2). All of the research on bergamot showed a positive effect on SBP (Figure 2). However, the results from the research on beetroot juice were not so clear. Three of five studies demonstrated the clinically important effects for SBP decrease (Coles 2012; Velmurugan 2016 and Jones 2019), and the last two showed no effect (Figure 2). Those two studies (Gilchrist 2013; Avoort 2021) with no effect to the placebo differed in the age of the study sample, which was over 65 years or the time of administration, lasting only 2 weeks (Table 1). The research on beetroot juice, shown in Table 2, also suggested that the clinical effect of the supplement can be obtained if the dosage is higher. The smallest effect on SBP was observed in the research on resveratrol (d = 0.09 (95% CI −1.14 to 1.32)) (Figure 2). The results of two studies showed a positive effect (Imamura 2016; Ciccone 2013), but they were characterized with a high dosage of the supplement or a longer time of administration in comparison to the study with no effect on SBP (Table 1). It was also observed based on the results from the research on resveratrol demonstrated in Table 2. There was also one study demonstrating the effect of barberry juice on SBP decrease (Table 2).

3.2. Analysis of the Supplements DBP Effectiveness

In general, the analysis of the collected results showed a positive but rather moderate effect of the supplements on DBP (d = 0.31 (95% CI −0.28 to 0.90)) with no statistical significance (Figure 3). The strongest effect on DBP was also observed in the research on pycnogenol (d = 2.07 (95% CI −1.85 to 6.00)), but the results were less unambiguous in comparison to the results on SBP (Table 1). The strongest effect that was statistically significant was shown in the Belcaro 2012 study with p < 0.001. There was one study in which the results did not show the effect on DBP (Sedighiyan 2018), but it may be dependent on the time of supplement administration, which may be necessary to be longer at a dose of 150 mg to have a reducing effect on DBP (Table 2). The next supplement that was noticed to influence DBP was beetroot juice (d = 1.34 (95% CI −2.88 to 5.55)) (Figure 2). The results from three of five studies (Velmurugan 2016; Coles 2012; Jones 2019) demonstrated the clinically important effects of DBP decrease and what was similar to SBP (Figure 3). The results of two studies showed no effect that could be influenced by the participants age or the dosage of the administered supplement (Figure 3, Table 1 and Table 2). The smallest influence on DBP was observed in research on bergamot (d = 0.36 (95% CI −0.36 to 1.08)), although some clinical effect on SBP decrease was observed (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Ferro (2020) showed the strongest effect of bergamot (d = 1.06 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.52)), which was statistically significant with p < 0.001. The study with no effect on the DBP decrease was in the study with a shorter time of administration, which may result in different DBP improvements (Table 1). The negative effect on DBP was observed in the research on resveratrol (Figure 3 and Table 1). Only one of four studies (Imamura 2016) showed a strong positive effect of resveratrol on DBP (d = 1.60 (95% CI 0.80 to 2.40) with p < 0.05, but it was a study with a long-term follow-up (Figure 3 and Table 1). The results of the research described in Table 2 also suggest that the effectiveness on DBP may be depended on time or dosage. It was also observed that the study participants involved into the study were also those over 65 years, which can also influence the results (Table 2). The results of research on resveratrol that showed the positive effect on BP were usually people aged below 65 years (Table 1 and Table 2). In addition, the barberry juice can influence DBP, which was observed in one study (Table 2).

4. Discussion

The present study is a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of several dietary supplements, such as pycnogenol, resveratrol, beetroot juice, barberry, bergamot, or cherry juice, recognized to be effective in blood pressure (BP) decrease, including 31 RCTs (1250 participants). Overall, the results demonstrated that most of them can be clinically effective in decreasing BP and improving cardiovascular function in different patients; however, the supplement effectiveness may be dependent on the dosage of the bioactive compound or the time of administration. To our knowledge, this is the first this kind of paper gathering information on several supplements that are recommended in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
Based on the results of the present review, it seems that, among different supplements recommended in blood pressure improvement, the supplementation of pycnogenol can bring the most benefits in the prevention of blood pressure. It is in line with a previous review that indicated that pycnogenol supplementation reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in trials with more than an 8-week intervention [44]. Pourmasoumi et al. also suggested that a favourable effect on DBP was observed in studies with over a 12-week in duration [45]. Fogacci et al. stated that pycnogenol consumption did not reduce BP levels [46], but the duration across the considered clinical studies varied substantially; thus, the results from long-term trials are required to confirm those findings.
Additional supplements that may be beneficial in the prevention of elevated blood pressure are beetroot juice, bergamot, and cherry juice; however, the effect is not the same on systolic and diastolic BP. Beetroot juice, cherry juice, and bergamot were observed to be the most effective in SBP response; however, the favourable effect on DBP was not so clear. Generally, the positive effect of nitrate supplementation on BP was noticed after medium-term dietary intake in clinical settings [26]. In addition, the previous review comparing the effects of the chronic consumption of cherry juice on the risk of cardiovascular disease confirmed that its supplementation might contribute to an improvement in BP [47]. However, the investigation of the hypotensive properties of beetroot juice also highlighted that no significant change in DBP was observed to its baseline value after beetroot juice treatment [48]. The findings of the present review indicated that the research on beetroot juice with no effect on BP was characterized by smaller doses of the administered supplement or the participants were over 65 years old. The duration of all the studies was at least 2 weeks, which was the shortest time to obtain the positive effect of the supplement on BP [48]. Although it is evidenced that a dose of 500 mL/d of beetroot juice was noticed to have the strongest relationship with blood pressures decrease [48], the study of Velmurugan showed that even 250 mL of nitrate-rich beetroot juice in a 6-week duration can be effective [49]. Therefore, it can be assumed that the age of the individual may have also affect the BP improvement after beetroot juice supplementation. There is little research analysing the different protocols of bergamot in blood pressure response. Nevertheless, the results of the present review suggest that the right dosage of the supplement may influence the DBP reduction.
A single study included in the present review showed some positive effects of barberry on BP in people with type 2 diabetes [40]. Nevertheless, the studies regarding the effect of barberry on cardiovascular risk factor are limited. Recently, Hadi et al. showed that the consumption of barberry can be a safe strategy for the management of lipid parameters [50].
Resveratrol provided the least clinically important effect on blood pressure, both in SBP and DBP reduction, and the most clinically significant effects were observed only in research with a long-term follow-up or a high dosage administration. Fogacci et al. noticed that the favourable effect of resveratrol in order to prevent cardiovascular diseases is mostly when used in a daily dose of ≥300 mg/day [32], especially in people with diabetes. Resveratrol was also observed to be useful in metabolic parameter reduction and HDL increase, but still the effect depended on the high dosage (over 500 mg) or long-term intervention (over 10 weeks) [51]. In contrast, in people with a metabolic syndrome, no significant effect was observed in SBP and DBP reduction [52]. The administration of 3 g of resveratrol daily may be related with experiencing gastrointestinal syndromes [53], which is worth considering when planning therapy with this supplement.
There are several strengths of the present review. Firstly, it was prepared to be in line with the current PRISMA recommendations [54]. Secondly, the review included several supplements that had very similar chemical components or bioactive features considered to be effective in blood pressure response, while other previous reviews were mainly focused only on a particular supplement [45,48,55]. Next, only the single supplement results of RCTs were analysed, as those provided the best evidence on the efficacy of specific pharmacological treatments [56]. Finally, the review included supplements that have been rarely described in previous reviews with meta-analysis [47].
However, some limitations have to be emphasized. The number of studies included in a meta-analysis was relatively small for most supplements. Unfortunately, some of the results from the selected research were presented only graphically in the figures, without giving the average values that were required for the meta-analysis. In the case of extracts, it would be advisable to attach a quantitative and qualitative specification of the composition to verify that the extracts used in different studies did not differ, which could affect the obtained results. In addition, the research process was limited to articles in English, which could introduce bias. The methodological approach of a meta-analysis was to compare each of the supplements with placebo; therefore, a further network meta-analysis might be needed to provide a single, coherent ranking of supplements by performing direct and indirect comparisons to determine which is the optimal supplement.
To sum up, the overall analysis including all the trials showed that the analysed supplements provided clinical meaningful effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses compared with the placebo, mainly in healthy adults or people below 65 years. Further placebo-controlled trials with a higher dosage or a longer treatment duration are required to clearly confirm the efficacy of supplements such as beetroot juice, bergamot, and resveratrol. It would also suggest to further evaluate the safety of using these supplements in longer administrations. The findings from the present review and meta-analysis provided thorough and valuable information for physicians, dietitians, or other health promotion professionals to choose suitable supplements as a cost-effective nutritional approach in the early prevention of elevated blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes.

5. Conclusions

Supplements studied in this paper can be effective in blood pressure reduction and cardiovascular prevention. The best antihypertensive effect was shown by resveratrol and pycnogenol; however, it depended on the dose and frequency of administration. Beetroot juice, cherry juice, and bergamot mainly influenced systolic blood pressure. In the case of using barberry juice, it is not possible to unequivocally determine its influence on blood pressure due to the limited number of publications. To obtain an appropriate clinical effect, it is necessary to define a separate protocol of supplementation for each of them. Further research allowing the establishment of a safe dosage level that does not disturb the digestive system is recommended.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox11081419/s1, Table S1. Search terms used for database searches, based on the PICO System for search strategy development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.; methodology, A.L.; software, A.L.; validation, A.L.; formal analysis, A.L.; investigation, I.S., E.M.-W. and E.K.; resources, I.S., E.M.-W. and E.K.; data curation, I.S., E.M.-W. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, I.S. and E.M.-W.; visualization, A.L., I.S., E.M.-W. and E.K.; supervision, A.L. and E.K.; project administration, A.L.; funding acquisition, A.L. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Rosei, E.A.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2018, 36, 1953–2041. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Collins, K.J.; Himmelfarb, C.D.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018, 71, 1269–1324. [Google Scholar]
  3. AlJohani, S.; Salam, M.; BaniMustafa, A.; Zaidi, A.R.Z.; Aljohani, A.A.; Almutairi, A.; AlJohani, M.A.; AlSheef, M. Dietary Habits of Students Enrolled in Faculties of Health Sciences: A Cross-sectional Study. Cureus 2019, 11, e6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. American Heart Association (AHA). Understanding Blood Pressure Readings. 2022. Available online: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/high-blood-pressure/understanding-blood-pressure-readings (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  5. Visseren, F.L.; Mach, F.; Smulders, Y.M.; Carballo, D.; Koskinas, K.C.; Bäck, M.; Benetos, A.; Biffi, A.; Boavida, J.-M.; Capodanno, D.; et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies With the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Rev. Esp. Cardiol 2022, 75, 429. [Google Scholar]
  6. World Health Organization. High Blood Pressure: A Public Health Problem. Available online: http://www.emro.who.int/media/world-health-day/public-health-problem-factsheet-2013.html (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  7. Ried, K.; Fakler, P.; Stocks, N.P. Effect of cocoa on blood pressure. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 4, Cd008893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hasani, H.; Arab, A.; Hadi, A.; Pourmasoumi, M.; Ghavami, A.; Miraghajani, M. Does ginger supplementation lower blood pressure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 1639–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reynolds, A.; Mann, J.; Cummings, J.; Winter, N.; Mete, E.; Te Morenga, L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: A series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet 2019, 393, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Qi, D.; Nie, X.-L.; Zhang, J.-J. The effect of probiotics supplementation on blood pressure: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, K.; Liu, C.; Kuang, X.; Deng, Q.; Zhao, F.; Li, D. Effects of Multivitamin and Multimineral Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Moradi, M.; Sohrabi, G.; Golbidi, M.; Yarmohammadi, S.; Hemati, N.; Campbell, M.S.; Moradi, S.; Kermani, M.A.H.; Farzaei, M.H. Effects of artichoke on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 57, 102668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Farzaei, M.H.; Rahimi, R.; Nikfar, S.; Abdollahi, M. Effect of resveratrol on cognitive and memory performance and mood: A meta-analysis of 225 patients. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 128, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Xing, B.; Li, X.; Kong, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. An Overview of Plant Phenolic Compounds and Their Importance in Human Nutrition and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Molecules 2016, 21, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nardini, M. Phenolic Compounds in Food: Characterization and Health Benefits. Molecules 2022, 27, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chiavaroli, L.; Viguiliouk, E.; Nishi, S.K.; Mejia, S.B.; Rahelić, D.; Kahleova, H.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Sievenpiper, J.L. DASH Dietary Pattern and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nutrients 2019, 11, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hung, H.-C.; Joshipura, K.; Jiang, R.; Hu, F.B.; Hunter, D.; Smith-Warner, S.A.; Colditz, G.; Rosner, B.; Spiegelman, D.; Willett, W.C. Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Major Chronic Disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004, 96, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Nöthlings, U.; Schulze, M.B.; Weikert, C.; Boeing, H.; van der Schouw, Y.; Bamia, C.; Benetou, V.; Lagiou, P.; Krogh, V.; Beulens, J.W.J.; et al. Intake of Vegetables, Legumes, and Fruit, and Risk for All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality in a European Diabetic Population. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kar, P.; Laight, D.; Rooprai, H.K.; Shaw, K.M.; Cummings, M. Effects of grape seed extract in Type 2 diabetic subjects at high cardiovascular risk: A double blind randomized placebo controlled trial examining metabolic markers, vascular tone, inflammation, oxidative stress and insulin sensitivity. Diabet. Med. 2009, 26, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Filippou, C.D.; Tsioufis, C.P.; Thomopoulos, C.G.; Mihas, C.C.; Dimitriadis, K.S.; Sotiropoulou, L.I.; Chrysochoou, C.A.; Nihoyannopoulos, P.I.; Tousoulis, D.M. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Blood Pressure Reduction in Adults with and without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sacks, F.M.; Svetkey, L.P.; Vollmer, W.M.; Appel, L.J.; Bray, G.A.; Harsha, D.; Obarzanek, E.; Conlin, P.R.; Miller, E.R.; Simons-Morton, D.G.; et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nahas, R. Complementary and alternative medicine approaches to blood pressure reduction: An evidence-based review. Can. Fam. Physician 2008, 54, 1529–1533. [Google Scholar]
  23. Brook, R.D.; Appel, L.J.; Rubenfire, M.; Ogedegbe, G.; Bisognano, J.D.; Elliott, W.J.; Fuchs, F.D.; Hughes, J.W.; Lackland, D.T.; Staffileno, B.A.; et al. Beyond medications and diet: Alternative approaches to lowering blood pressure: A scientific statement from the american heart association. Hypertension 2013, 61, 1360–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Filippini, T.; Naska, A.; Kasdagli, M.; Torres, D.; Lopes, C.; Carvalho, C.; Moreira, P.; Malavolti, M.; Orsini, N.; Whelton, P.K.; et al. Potassium Intake and Blood Pressure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e015719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Asbaghi, O.; Naeini, F.; Ashtary-Larky, D.; Kaviani, M.; Kelishadi, M.R.; Eslampour, E.; Moradi, S.; Mirzadeh, E.; Clark, C.C.; Naeini, A.A. Effects of chromium supplementation on blood pressure, body mass index, liver function enzymes and malondialdehyde in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 60, 102755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ashor, A.W.; Lara, J.; Siervo, M. Medium-term effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hypertens. 2017, 35, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Weaver, S.R.; Rendeiro, C.; McGettrick, H.M.; Philp, A.; Lucas, S.J.E. Fine wine or sour grapes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of red wine polyphenols on vascular health. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nyambuya, T.; Nkambule, B.; Mazibuko-Mbeje, S.; Mxinwa, V.; Mokgalaboni, K.; Orlando, P.; Silvestri, S.; Louw, J.; Tiano, L.; Dludla, P. A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Resveratrol Supplementation on Markers of Renal Function and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Hypoglycemic Therapy. Molecules 2020, 25, 5645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Qasem, R.J. The estrogenic activity of resveratrol: A comprehensive review of in vitro and in vivo evidence and the potential for endocrine disruption. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2020, 50, 439–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shaito, A.; Posadino, A.M.; Younes, N.; Hasan, H.; Halabi, S.; Alhababi, D.; Al-Mohannadi, A.; Abdel-Rahman, W.M.; Eid, A.H.; Nasrallah, G.K.; et al. Potential Adverse Effects of Resveratrol: A Literature Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fogacci, F.; Tocci, G.; Presta, V.; Fratter, A.; Borghi, C.; Cicero, A.F.G. Effect of resveratrol on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled, clinical trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1605–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zamani, H.; de Joode, M.; Hossein, I.J.; Henckens, N.F.T.; Guggeis, M.A.; Berends, J.E.; de Kok, T.M.C.M.; van Breda, S.G.J. The benefits and risks of beetroot juice consumption: A systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 788–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jakubcik, E.M.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K.; Chabert, M.; Wong, M.; Ali, A. Pharmacokinetics of Nitrate and Nitrite Following Beetroot Juice Drink Consumption. Nutrients 2021, 13, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oliveira-Paula, G.H.; Lacchini, R.; Tanus-Santos, J.E. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase: From biochemistry and gene structure to clinical implications of NOS3 polymorphisms. Gene 2016, 575, 584–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lubos, E.; Handy, D.E.; Loscalzo, J. Role of oxidative stress and nitric oxide in atherothrombosis. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 5323–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Borghi, C.; Cicero, A.F.G. Nutraceuticals with a clinically detectable blood pressure-lowering effect: A review of available randomized clinical trials and their meta-analyses. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kapil, V.; Khambata, R.S.; Robertson, A.; Caulfield, M.J.; Ahluwalia, A. Dietary nitrate provides sustained blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients: A randomized, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hypertension 2015, 65, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Imenshahidi, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Berberis Vulgaris and Berberine: An Update Review. Phytother Res. 2016, 30, 1745–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lazavi, F.; Mirmiran, P.; Sohrab, G.; Nikpayam, O.; Angoorani, P.; Hedayati, M. The barberry juice effects on metabolic factors and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2018, 31, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Carresi, C.; Gliozzi, M.; Musolino, V.; Scicchitano, M.; Scarano, F.; Bosco, F.; Nucera, S.; Maiuolo, J.; Macrì, R.; Ruga, S.; et al. The Effect of Natural Antioxidants in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome: Focus on Bergamot Polyphenolic Fraction. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1504. [Google Scholar]
  42. Perna, S.; Spadaccini, D.; Botteri, L.; Girometta, C.; Riva, A.; Allegrini, P.; Petrangolini, G.; Infantino, V.; Rondanelli, M. Efficacy of bergamot: From anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative mechanisms to clinical applications as preventive agent for cardiovascular morbidity, skin diseases, and mood alterations. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 369–384. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chai, S.C.; Davis, K.; Zhang, Z.; Zha, L.; Kirschner, K.F. Effects of Tart Cherry Juice on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Older Adults. Nutrients 2019, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Malekahmadi, M.; Moradi Moghaddam, O.; Firouzi, S.; Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara, R.; Islam, S.M.S.; Norouzy, A.; Soltani, S. Effects of pycnogenol on cardiometabolic health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 150, 104472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pourmasoumi, M.; Hadi, A.; Mohammadi, H.; Rouhani, M.H. Effect of pycnogenol supplementation on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Phytotherapy Res. 2020, 34, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fogacci, F.; Tocci, G.; Sahebkar, A.; Presta, V.; Banach, M.; Cicero, A.F.G. Effect of Pycnogenol on Blood Pressure: Findings From a PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Studies. Angiology 2010, 71, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, Y.; Gallegos, J.L.; Haskell-Ramsay, C.; Lodge, J.K. Effects of chronic consumption of specific fruit (berries, citrus and cherries) on CVD risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 615–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bahadoran, Z.; Mirmiran, P.; Kabir, A.; Azizi, F.; Ghasemi, A. The Nitrate-Independent Blood Pressure–Lowering Effect of Beetroot Juice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Velmurugan, S.; Gan, J.M.; Rathod, K.S.; Khambata, R.S.; Ghosh, S.M.; Hartley, A.; Van Eijl, S.; Sagi-Kiss, V.; Chowdhury, T.A.; Curtis, M.; et al. Dietary nitrate improves vascular function in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hadi, A.; Arab, A.; Ghaedi, E.; Rafie, N.; Miraghajani, M.; Kafeshani, M. Barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) is a safe approach for management of lipid parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther. Med. 2019, 43, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Asgary, S.; Karimi, R.; Momtaz, S.; Naseri, R.; Farzaei, M.H. Effect of resveratrol on metabolic syndrome components: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 20, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akbari, M.; Tamtaji, O.R.; Lankarani, K.B.; Tabrizi, R.; Dadgostar, E.; Kolahdooz, F.; Jamilian, M.; Mirzaei, H.; Asemi, Z. The Effects of Resveratrol Supplementation on Endothelial Function and Blood Pressures Among Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2019, 26, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pollack, R.M.; Barzilai, N.; Anghel, V.; Kulkarni, A.; Golden, A.; Broin, P.; Sinclair, D.; Bonkowski, M.; Coleville, A.J.; Powell, D.; et al. Resveratrol Improves Vascular Function and Mitochondrial Number but Not Glucose Metabolism in Older Adults. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017, 72, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dyck, G.J.B.; Raj, P.; Zieroth, S.; Dyck, J.R.B.; Ezekowitz, J.A. The Effects of Resveratrol in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Freedman, B. Placebo-controlled trials and the logic of clinical purpose. IRB Ethics Hum. Res. 1990, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 11 01419 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process for all of the articles.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process for all of the articles.
Antioxidants 11 01419 g001
Antioxidants 11 01419 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot of the results of the meta-analysis for supplement effectiveness on SBP versus the placebo group. Data are shown as mean effect sizes with 95% CI.
Figure 2. Forest plot of the results of the meta-analysis for supplement effectiveness on SBP versus the placebo group. Data are shown as mean effect sizes with 95% CI.
Antioxidants 11 01419 g002
Antioxidants 11 01419 g003 550
Figure 3. Forest plot of the results of the meta-analysis for supplement effectiveness on DBP versus the placebo group. Data are shown as mean effect sizes with 95% CI.
Figure 3. Forest plot of the results of the meta-analysis for supplement effectiveness on DBP versus the placebo group. Data are shown as mean effect sizes with 95% CI.
Antioxidants 11 01419 g003
Table
Table 1. All studies included in the meta-analysis (n = 16).
Table 1. All studies included in the meta-analysis (n = 16).
Name of the SupplementAuthor YearSampleSupplement Administration ProtocolDurationForm of SupplementSignificant Results
ResveratrolAnton, 201432 overweight adults over 65 y300 mg/day or 1000 mg/day or placebo1 monthProduct was provided by Reserveage Organics and
contained naturally-derived resveratrol from grapes and wild Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum). Microcrystalline cellulose was used for the placebo.		Daily resveratrol supplementation is generally well-tolerated in overweight, older adults.
Imamura, 201650 patients with T2DM100 mg/day or placebo12 weeksResveratrol was obtained from the BHN Corporation (Tokyo) as resveratrol-ε, which is derived from grape stems. Supplement of a 100-mg resveratrol (total resveratrol: oligo-stilbene 27.97 mg/100 mg/day) or placebo tablet.Resveratrol supplementation decreased: systolic BP (−5.5 mmHg), d-ROMs (−25.6 ± 41.8 U.CARR), CAVI (−0.4 ± 0.7), BW (−0.8 ± 2.1 kg,), and body mass index (−0.5 kg/m2). Resveratrol supplementation improved arterial stiffness and reduced oxidative stress in patients with T2DM.
Ciccone, 201350 eligible healthy volunteers aged 20–50 years500 mg/day or placebo1 monthSupplement Transmax (resveratrol, 500 mg, Biotivia Bioceuticals LLC).Resveratrol supplementation significantly reduced triglyceride and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and increased Total Antioxidant Status (TAS) values.
Cherry juiceChai, 201837 healthy adults, aged 65–80 years480 mL of tart cherry juice or control drink per day12 weeksA total of 68 mL of Montmorency tart cherry concentrate (King Orchards, MI, USA) was diluted with 412 mL water. The control drink had the colour and taste as close as possible to the tart cherry juice, and it was prepared by mixing unsweetened black cherry-flavoured Kool-Aid (Kraft Foods, United States) with water. Drinks were consumed twice a day (in the morning and evening) in a dose of 240 mL per time.Tart cherry juice decreased the levels of LDL and systolic BP.
Lynn, 201447 healthy adults, aged 30–50 years250 mL of tart cherry juice or control drink per day6 weeksA total of 250 mL of tart cherry juice (30 mL concentrate—Cherry Active) diluted in water or the same volume of control drink-lemonade (Sprite) was consumed per day.Tart cherry juice had no effect on arterial stiffness, c-reactive protein, and risk markers for cardiovascular disease. Some antioxidant effects can be observed among healthy adults.
Johnson, 202019 participants with metabolic syndrome, aged 20–60 years480 mL of tart cherry juice or control drink per day12 weeksThe tart cherry juice consisted of Montmorency tart cherry juice and concentrate (Indian Summer, Inc., Traverse City, MI, USA). The tart cherry juice and the placebo-control drink were consumed twice a day (240 mL each, in the morning and in the evening).Tart cherry juice decreased the levels of LDL and total cholesterol. There were no significant effects on hemodynamic or arterial stiffness parameters.
BergamotCicero, 201990 overweight participants with dyslipidaemia; aged 20–75 yearspill with bergamot extract (120-mg flavonoids/pill) or placebo pill; two pills per day8 weeksBefore the treatment period, there was the diet standardization and physical activity period (2 weeks). A patient from the high-dose group was given two boxes with active treatment-Colber (from Esserre Pharma srl, Rome, Italy) containing bergamot extract (120 mg flavonoids/pill). A patient from the low-dose group was given one box with an active treatment and one with placebo. The patient from the placebo group was given two boxes with placebo pills. Each patient had 170 pills and took one tablet from each of two boxes at bedtime.Improvement in TG, LDL; total cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and tumour necrosis factor-α decreased; improved lipid and glucose metabolism, adipokines pattern, and systemic inflammation in overweight subjects with dyslipidaemia.
Ferro, 2020102 patients with liver steatosis; aged 30–75 years300 mg/day or placebo12 weeksParticipants received a nutraceutical from Bergamot and wild cardoon or placebo.Liver fat content reduction, especially in participants over 50 years.
PycnogenolBelcaro, 2013130 participants with metabolic syndrome, aged 45–55 years150 mg/day or placebo6 monthsThe 50-mg tablets with Pycnogenol, from GEFA (Chateaugiron, France), were taken three times a day (total 150 mg of Pycnogenol per day)Pycnogenol supplementation decreased levels of TG, fasting glucose, and plasma free radicals and increased the HDL cholesterol level. Pycnogenol decreased waist circumference and blood pressure.
Enseleit, 201223 patients with coronary artery disease, aged 49–73 years200 mg/day8 weeks-Pycnogenol supplementation improved endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease by reducing oxidative stress.
Sedighiyan, 201838 obese women, aged 18–45 years150 mg/day or placebo2 monthsWomen received a weight loss diet and tablets (the PBE group) with 150 mg pine bark extract, from Source Naturals (CA, USA) and the placebo group received one placebo tablet (containing starch powder) per day for 2 months with a meal. Pine bark extract had positive effects on TG, fasting blood sugar, HDL, and BP. It had a protective effect on metabolic syndrome in obesity.
Beetroot juiceAvoort, 202177 (pre)hypertensive adults, mean age 65 y250–300 g of nitrate-rich vegetables consumption (containing ∼350–400 mg nitrate/∼6–6.5 mmol nitrate) vs. 70 mL BRJ drink (400 mg nitrate) vs. control (usual dietary behaviour)12 weeksPersonalized dietary intervention vs. concentrated red beetroot juice (Beet-it Sport®, 70 mL; James White Drinks Ltd.) vs. usual diet.A prolonged dietary intervention with high-nitrate vegetable intake lowered SBP in (pre)hypertensive middle-aged and older adults. DBP did not change in any of the groups.
Gilchrist, 201327 adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 67 y250 mL BRJ (7.5 mmol of nitrate) daily or 250 mL nitrate-depleted BRJ (0.002 mmol of nitrate)2 weeksBRJ sold as a beverage. They used their own procedure for the production of placebo juice, using a column containing a nitrate-specific anion-exchange resin (Purolite A520e).Supplementation with 7.5 mmol of nitrate per day did not lower BP or improve endothelial function in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Jones, 201920 healthy older adults, mean age 63 y70 mL NO3− rich BRJ (400 mg of NO3−) a day vs. placebo 28 days (±7)BRJ drink (Beet-It Sport Shot 400). Prune juice was used for the placebo.BRJ ingestion potentially improved BP. A decrease in SBP (−6 mmHg) and DBP (−4 mmHg) was significant (p = 0.04; p = 0.01, respectively). BP remained unchanged in the placebo group.
Coles, 201230 healthy adults, mean age 42 y500 g of beetroot and apple juice (BJ) containing 15 mmol nitrate/L or a placebo juice24 h (measurements every hour after consumption)Beetroot and apple juice (72% beetroots and 28% apples) vs. placebo (apple) juice; both supplied by Sunraysia Natural Beverage Company, Melbourne, VIC. Trend of a lower SBP at 6 h after drinking BJ relative to placebo. Only men demonstrated a significant reduction in SBP (4–5 mmHg) at 6 h after BJ consumption.
Velmurugan, 201667 adults with untreated hypercholesterolemia, mean age 53 y250 mL nitrate-rich BRJ vs. placebo (nitrate-depleted BRJ) 6 weeksFor BRJ, they used James Whites Drinks. The placebo juice was generated from the same batch of nitrate-replete juice by using a standard anion exchange resin, as described in the protocol. Dietary nitrate ingestion lowered SBP (−4 mmHg) and improved vascular function (increase in the FMD response with a worsening in the placebo group) in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Table
Table 2. Supplement effectiveness review based on the included articles (n = 15).
Table 2. Supplement effectiveness review based on the included articles (n = 15).
Name of the SupplementAuthor YearSampleSupplement Administration ProtocolPlacebo GroupDurationForm of SupplementFindings
ResveratrolPollack, 2017older glucose-intolerant adults aged 50–80 years (n = 30)A resveratrol dose of 1500 mg twice daily was administered to the initial nine participants; however, because of gastrointestinal side effects, subsequent participants received 1000 mg twice daily. The study consisted of two randomly assigned 6-week treatment periods (resveratrol and placebo). Participants were instructed to begin the study drug on the evening following the baseline measurements and continue through the evening prior to metabolic testing at the end of each treatment period. Following a 3-week washout period, the participants crossed over to the other intervention for the second 6-week treatment period.Older glucose-intolerant adults aged 50–80 years (n = 30)6 weeksResveratrol capsules (RevGenetics Corporation)No changes in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, weight, blood pressure, or lipid profile; however, resveratrol treatment may have beneficial effects on vascular function
Ligt, 202041 men and women (BMI: 27–35 kg/m2; aged 40–70 yA total of 150 mg/d of resveratrol (n = 20) was administered in two doses of 75 mg per day—1 during lunch and 1 during dinner.21 persons6 monthsTrans-resveratrol (resVida, 99.9%; provided by DSM Nutritional Products) capsulesNo differences were found in intrahepatic lipid, body composition, blood pressure, energy metabolism, physical performance, or quality of life and sleep between treatment arms.
Cherry juiceDesai, 201811 healthy, recreationally active participants; 30 ± 10 years260 mL of Montmorency tart cherry juice or placebo per day 20 daysA total of 30 mL of Montmorency tart cherry concentrate (Cherry Active, Active Edge Ltd., Hanworth, UK) and 100 mL of water gave 130 mL of tart cherry juice, and the placebo drink was made with 30 mL of commercially available fruit-flavoured cordial (Cherries and Berries, Morrisons Bradford, UK) and 100 mL of water. The amount of 130 mL of drinks was consumed twice a day (in the morning and in the evening).Consumption of Montmorency tart cherry juice in addition to exercising did not give an improvement on cardio-metabolic biomarkers.
Beetroot juiceAsgary, 201624 hypertensive subjects aged 25–68 years old250 mL/day raw beet juice (RBJ) vs. 250 g/day cooked beet (CB)NA2 weeks,
followed by a 2-week washout period before entering the second phase of the study and receiving alternate treatment		Participants own preparation according to instruction Both RBJ and CB were effective in improving BP, endothelial function, and systemic inflammation. BRJ had greater antihypertensive effects. More improvement was observed in endothelial function and systemic inflammation with RBJ compared with CB.
Avoort, 202030 recreationally active individuals, mean age 24 years250 g vegetables (ca.400 mg nitrate daily) at lunch vs. 70 mL of red beetroot juice/dayNABP measurement fasting and 2.5 h after lunch on day 1, 4, and 7.Participant own preparation vs. BRJ drink (Beet-it Sport; James White Drinks Ltd.).Fasting mean systolic and diastolic BP did not change, but the mean systolic and diastolic BP assessed 2.5 h after lunch were significantly reduced in both groups (SBP −5.1 mm Hg and DBP −5.3 mm Hg).
Bondonno, 201527 treated hypertensive individuals2 × 70 mL concentrated nitrate-rich beetroot juice (70 mL with breakfast and 70 mL with dinner) vs. placebo2 × 70 mL of nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (70 mL with breakfast and 70 mL with dinner)1 weekConcentrated nitrate-rich beetroot-juice beverage (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) vs. nitrate-depleted beetroot juice beverage (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.).No differences in home BP and 24-h ambulatory BP were observed with the 1-wk intake of nitrate-rich beetroot juice in comparison with the placebo.
Gallardo, 20219 healthy older subjects, mean age 70 y3.3 mL/kg of concentrated beetroot juice containing 0, 200, or 400 µmol/kg of nitrate. Pts received all doses, with a 1- to 2-week washout period between visits.Placebo: 3.3 mL/kg BRJ devoid of NO3−(0)2 hA commercial concentrated beetroot juice (BRJ) supplement (Beet It Sport, James White Drinks, Ipswich, UK); placebo was produced by extracting NO3− from BRJ using a highly selective anion exchange resin (i.e., Purolite a520e).No significant changes were found in systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial blood pressure.
Hobbs, 201218 normotensive individualsStudy 1. (n = 18) one intervention: 0 g BJ (500 g water) as a control; or 100 g BJ with 400 g water; or 250 g BJ with 250 g water or 500 g BRJStudy 2. (n = 14) one intervention: 200 g white bread (control, 0 g beetroot enrichment); or 200 g bread enriched with either white or red beetroot (comprising 50% of the total weight of dough before baking). NA24 h BRJ—James White Drinks Limited. The control drink and BJ drinks were all diluted with low-nitrate mineral water (The Buxton Mineral Water Company Limited). Bread products (Eccentricities Limited).BJ consumption significantly, and in a near dose-dependent manner, lowered SBP and DBP over a period of 24 h, compared with the water control.
Bread products enriched with 100 g of red or white beetroot lowered SBP and DBP over a period of 24 h, with no statistical differences between the varieties.
Avoort, 202015 healthy men and women, mean age 24 y400 mg of nitrate at lunch, provided through nitrate-rich vegetables and dietary counselling, or 70 mL beetroot juice supplementation. NA1 week, with 1-week washout Dietary instruction for patients; (70 mL) of red beetroot juice (Beet-it Sport; James White Drinks Ltd.)Fasting mean SBP and DBP did not change, but mean SBP and DBP assessed 2.5 h after lunch were significantly reduced throughout both intervention periods (p < 0.05), with no differences between beetroot juice and nitrate-rich vegetables.
Jakubcik, 202111 healthy adults, 18–50 years old250 mL of BR containing one of the following: (i) high NO3−, low NO2− (HL; 572 mg NO3−, 32 mg NO2−); (ii) medium NO3−, medium NO2− (MM; 280 mg NO3−, 237 mg NO2−); (iii) low NO3−, medium NO2− (LM; 43 mg NO3−, 262 mg NO2−); (iv) placebo (PL; low NO3−, low NO2−: 8 mg NO3−, 5.8 mg NO2−). placebo (PL; low NO3−, low NO2−: 8 mg NO3−, 5.8 mg NO2−)6 hPrepared according to the protocolThere was no effect of NO3− or NO2− ingestion on SBP or DBP compared to PL. Mean arterial pressure decreased following the consumption of HL, MM, and LM; however, in comparison, LM showed its effect 2 h later.
Kapil, 201568 hypertensive patients, 18–85 years old250 mL BRJ vs. 250 mL placebon = 344 weeks250 mL of beetroot juice, James White Drinks Ltd., Ipswich, UK; placebo 250 mL nitrate-depleted beetroot juice, James White Drinks Ltd., Ipswich, UK.Mean reduction in clinic BP was 7.7/2.4 mmHg; 24 h ambulatory blood pressure was reduced by 7.7/5.2 mmHg, and home blood pressure was reduced by 8.1/3.8 mmHg. Endothelial function improved by ~20%, and arterial stiffness reduced by 0.59 m/s after dietary nitrate consumption with no change after placebo
McDonagh, 201810 healthy, normotensive males, age 24 y55 mL of a concentrated beetroot juice drink (∼5.76 mmol) (BR); 456 mL of a non-concentrated beetroot juice drink (BL), and a solid beetroot flapjack (BF; 60 g). A drink containing soluble beetroot crystals (BC; ∼1.40 mmol NO3−) and a control drink (CON; 70 mL deionised water) were also ingested.NA24 hConcentrated beetroot drink (55 mL of Beet It Sport Stamina Shot, James White Drinks, Ltd., Ipswich, UK), a non-concentrated beetroot drink (456 mL of Beet It Organic Beetroot Juice, James White Drinks, Ltd., Ipswich, UK) and a beetroot flapjack (60 g of Beet It Pro Elite Sport Flapjack, James White Drinks, Ltd., Ipswich, UK). In addition, subjects consumed the recommended dose (5 g dissolved in 114 mL of water; 1.40 mmol NO3− and ∼0.07 mmol NO2− ) of Concentrated Organic Beetroot Crystals (SuperBeets Canister; Neogenis, now known as HumanN, Texas, US), and a control drink (70 mL deionised water) that contained negligible NO3− and NO2− contents.BR, but not BF, BL, and BC, reduced systolic (∼5 mmHg) and mean arterial pressure (∼3–4 mmHg; p < 0.05), whereas BF reduced diastolic BP (∼4 mmHg; p < 0.05).
Siervo, 202047 middle-aged and older participants, age: 50–70 y, with elevated blood pressure(1) high-nitrate beetroot juice (∼400 mg nitrate) and folic acid (∼5 mg folic acid) (N + F), (2) high-nitrate beetroot juice and placebo (N + P), or (3) nitrate-depleted beetroot juice and placebo (P + P).n = 1560 daysN + F: 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice (Beet It shots, James White Ltd.) and 1 capsule of folate (folic acid, 5 mg, Bio-Tech Pharmacal Inc.).
N + P: 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice as group 1 (Beet It, James White Ltd.) and 1 placebo capsule containing sucrose powder.
P + P: 70 mL of nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (<1 mg inorganic nitrate, James White Ltd.) and a placebo capsule containing sucrose powder.		After 60 d, 24-h systolic BP dropped by −10.8 ± 9.8 mm Hg (p < 0.001), −6.1 ± 13.2 mm Hg (p = 0.03), and −0.3 ± 9.7 mm Hg (p = 0.83) in the N + P, N + F, and P + P groups, respectively. There was a significant decrease in 24-h diastolic BP in the N + P group (−5.4 ± 5.0 mm Hg, p = 0.004), whereas changes were not significant in the N + F (−1.8 ± 8.1 mm Hg, p = 0.32) and P + P (1.6 ± 8.3 mm Hg, p = 0.43) groups.
Stanaway, 201913 younger (18–30 years) and 11 older (50–70 years) recreationally active adults Pts consumed either 150 mL of nitrate-rich beetroot juice (BR; 10.5 mmol nitrate) or placebo (PL; 1 mmol nitrate).The same as a study groupBP measurements before and 145 min after supplementation Beetroot juice, extracted from fresh washed beetroots (beta vulgaris ‘Pablo’), was blended with other fruit juices to provide a standardized beetroot juice drink with a constant soluble solid concentration and nitrate concentration (10.5 mmol/150 mL). The placebo beetroot drink was produced using beetroot juice concentrate and standardized to the same constant soluble solids concentration but contained a low nitrate concentration (1 mmol/150 mL).BR consumption significantly increased plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations and reduced SBP (p < 0.001) in both age groups and reduced DBP (p = 0.013) in older adults.
BarberryLazavi, 201846 diabetic patients; aged 30–70 years 200 mL of barberry juice dailyControl group received no intervention8 weeksThe concentrated barberry juice was diluted with water.The consumption of barberry juice decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure, TG, fasting blood sugar, and total cholesterol. The risk of cardiovascular diseases might decrease in patients with diabetes.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lipert, A.; Szadkowska, I.; Matusiak-Wieczorek, E.; Kochan, E. The Effect of Herbal Supplements on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081419

AMA Style

Lipert A, Szadkowska I, Matusiak-Wieczorek E, Kochan E. The Effect of Herbal Supplements on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(8):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lipert, Anna, Iwona Szadkowska, Ewelina Matusiak-Wieczorek, and Ewa Kochan. 2022. "The Effect of Herbal Supplements on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Antioxidants 11, no. 8: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop