Next Article in Journal
Rosmarinic Acid Delays Tomato Fruit Ripening by Regulating Ripening-Associated Traits
Next Article in Special Issue
The Uncoupling Proteins: A Systematic Review on the Mechanism Used in the Prevention of Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Malaxation Conditions to Produce an Arbequina EVOO with High Content of Bioactive Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Membrane-Associated Catalase, Extracellular ROS/RNS Signaling and Aquaporin/H2O2-Mediated Intracellular Glutathione Depletion Cooperate during Apoptosis Induction in the Human Gastric Carcinoma Cell Line MKN-45
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/antiox10111820
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bad Smells and Broken DNA: A Tale of Sulfur-Nucleic Acid Cooperation

by
Rodney E. Shackelford
1,*,
Yan Li
1,
Ghali E. Ghali
2 and
Christopher G. Kevil
1
1
Department of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
2
Head & Neck Oncologic/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery Department of Oral & Maxillofacial/Head & Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(11), 1820; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111820
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 11 November 2021 / Accepted: 13 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrogen Peroxide in Redox Signaling)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a gasotransmitter that exerts numerous physiologic and pathophysiologic effects. Recently, a role for H2S in DNA repair has been identified, where H2S modulates cell cycle checkpoint responses, the DNA damage response (DDR), and mitochondrial and nuclear genomic stability. In addition, several DNA repair proteins modulate cellular H2S concentrations and cellular sulfur metabolism and, in turn, are regulated by cellular H2S concentrations. Many DDR proteins are now pharmacologically inhibited in targeted cancer therapies. As H2S and the enzymes that synthesize it are increased in many human malignancies, it is likely that H2S synthesis inhibition by these therapies is an underappreciated aspect of these cancer treatments. Moreover, both H2S and DDR protein activities in cancer and cardiovascular diseases are becoming increasingly apparent, implicating a DDR–H2S signaling axis in these pathophysiologic processes. Taken together, H2S and DNA repair likely play a central and presently poorly understood role in both normal cellular function and a wide array of human pathophysiologic processes. Here, we review the role of H2S in DNA repair.

1. Introduction

The maintenance of genomic stability is essential for life, and cells have evolved complex and intricate molecular machinery to ensure DNA stability and accurate DNA replication [1,2,3,4]. Eukaryotic cells carry two separate genomes with different evolutionary origins [4,5]. The nuclear genome is diploid, linear, and in humans contains roughly 3.3 billion base pairs encoding over 20,000 genes [4,5]. Conversely, the mitochondrial genome is circular, contains 37 genes in 16,569 base pairs, and occurs in multiple copies at 100–1000/cell [4,5]. The two genomes extensively interact, with the nuclear genome encoding roughly 1500 mitochondrial proteins, including those involved in mitochondrial DNA repair, while mitochondrial genomic damage can initiate apoptotic cell death via cytochrome c release and can also activate the innate immune response [4,5,6,7]. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a gasotransmitter that, along with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, functions in a vast number of different physiologic and pathophysiologic processes [8,9]. Specifically, H2S has many physiologic regulatory roles, including in the renal, cardiovascular, central nervous, and digestive systems, and is also dysregulated in many different pathologic processes including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegeneration [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Recently, H2S has been found to regulate mitochondrial and nuclear DNA stability and repair [11,12,13]. Here, we review this new area of inquiry and discuss its possible implications for cancer chemotherapy and cardiovascular diseases.

2. H2S Chemistry, Synthesis, and Catabolism

2.1. H2S Chemistry

H2S has been known for over 300 years as an environmental toxin with high H2S concentrations causing damage in multiple organs, difficulty with breathing, shock, and convulsions, which may lead to death [18]. H2S toxicity occurs following cytochrome c oxidase, carbonic anhydrase, Na+/K+ ATPase, monoamine oxidase, and possibly ATR kinase inhibition [12,18,19,20,21]. H2S is a colorless, weak diprotic acid with a characteristic rotten egg smell, with first and second pKa values of 6.76 and 19 at 37 °C [18]. At pH 7.4, H2S is ~70–80% HS−, ~20% H2S, with low very concentrations of S2− [19]. H2S readily diffuses across biological membranes [22]. HS− has high nucleophilicity and chemical reactivity, but it is not membrane permeable, although it may cross membranes due to its rapid interconversion with H2S or through specific transporters [9,22,23,24]. The minus two sulfur oxidation state in H2S renders it an obligatory reductant, and H2S exerts numerous antioxidant effects [9,24,25,26]. However, cellular H2S concentrations are low at 10–30 nM, and H2S reacts too slowly with oxidants, such as H2O2 and hypochlorite, to exert significant antioxidant effects [14,19,27,28,29]. Thus, its antioxidants effects are likely mediated through events such as the H2S-mediated induction of glutathione synthesis and cystine uptake, the inhibition of mitochondrial free radical production, and Nrf2 induction [9,25,27]. H2S exists in thermodynamic equilibrium with other sulfur species including persulfides, polysulfides, and reactive sulfur species. The roles of these compounds in human health and disease are presently poorly understood and are an area of intense investigation [14]. The cell and tissue H2S half-lives are short, being only a few minutes [9,19].

2.2. H2S Synthesis

Biological H2S synthesis was first identified in bacteria in 1895, and it was not until 1996 that endogenous H2S as a biological modulator in humans was identified [10,30]. In mammals H2S is primarily synthesized by three systems which contribute unequally to the sulfur pool: (1) enzymatic synthesis, (2) non-enzymatic synthesis, and (3) microbiome production. Enzymatic H2S synthesis occurs through three enzymes: cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST, [9]). These enzymes show tissue and organ-specific distributions patterns [8,10,31,32]. CSE is predominantly found within the vasculature, while CBS occurs in the liver, brain, and nervous system, and 3-MST occurs mainly in the vasculature and the brain [10,31,32]. CSE and CBS are predominantly cytosolic pyridoxal-5′-phosphate-dependent hemeproteins, while 3-MST is mainly mitochondrial and synthesizes roughly 90% of brain H2S [10,31,32,33].
The enzymatic synthesis of H2S in mammals requires methionine and cysteine, with methionine being derived solely from the diet, as it cannot be synthesized in mammalian tissues [19,34]. These amino acids are converted into homocysteine by the transsulfuration pathway [19,34]. CBS synthesizes H2S by catalyzing homocysteine and L-cysteine to form cystathionine and H2S [19,35]. CBS generates H2S through a β-replacement reaction also producing serine. In the presence of homocysteine H2S synthesis increases 23-fold compared to the reaction with L-cysteine alone [19,36]. CBS also catalyzes the condensation of L-serine and homocysteine, forming cystathionine and H2O, a significant step in L-cysteine biosynthesis [37]. CSE catalyzes homocysteine, generating H2S, α-ketobutyrate, and NH3 [9,19,38]. Interestingly, at physiologic L-cysteine and homocysteine concentrations, roughly 70% of the H2S synthesized for the CSE-mediated α,β-elimination of L-cysteine, while the α,γ-elimination of homocysteine contributes approximately 29% of the total H2S content; however, roughly 90% of the H2S is derived from the α,γ-elimination of homocysteine when its levels are increased to those seen in hyperhomocysteinemia [38]. 3-MST H2S synthesis requires cysteine aminotransferase to convert L-cysteine into 3-mercaptopyruvate, which is then catalyzed by 3-MST into H2S and pyruvate [39]. D-cysteine can be converted to 3-mercaptopyruvate by the peroxisome-located D-amino acid oxidase, which, once imported into the mitochondrion, is converted into H2S by 3-MST. As D-amino acid oxidase expression is limited to the brain and kidneys, this H2S synthesis pathway is likely limited to those organs [40].
Based on its chemistry, the molecular mechanisms of H2S reactivity have been placed into three categories: (1) chemical interfacing/scavenging with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, (2) chemical modification of protein cysteines to persulfides, and (3) binding to and/or redox reactions with metal centers [9]. Intracellular H2S exists as free H2S, acid-labile sulfide, and bound sulfane sulfur [19]. The acid-labile sulfide faction consists of sulfur present in iron–sulfur clusters contained within iron–sulfur proteins (non-heme), which are ubiquitous and include ferredoxins, rubredoxins, aconitase, and succinate dehydrogenase [19]. The sulfane sulfur fraction consists of sulfur atoms bound only to other sulfur atoms, these include thiosulfate S2O32–, persulfides, R–S–SH, thiosulfonates R–S(O)–S–R’, polysulfides R–Sn–R, polythionates SnO62–, and elemental sulfur S0 [19]. Free cellular H2S represents less than 1% of the potentially available sulfide, indicating that the endogenous sulfide pool likely has significant buffering capacity [9].

2.3. Non-Enzymatic H2S Synthesis

H2S is also synthesized through non-enzymatic mechanisms and occurs by an iron and vitamin B6-mediated catalysis of L- or D-cysteine producing pyruvate, NH3, and H2S [41]. This H2S synthesizing pathway likely plays a role in maintaining basal H2S levels and may be an important H2S source in iron overload and hemorrhagic disorders [41]. Lastly, the mammalian microbiome regulates systemic H2S bioavailability and metabolism. Germ-free mice show significantly lower plasma and gastrointestinal H2S and 50–80% lower plasma, adipose, and lung tissue bound sulfane sulfur compared to conventionally housed mice. Interestingly, CSE activity was reduced in many organs of the germ-free mice, while tissue cysteine levels were elevated [42].

2.4. H2S Catabolism

High cellular H2S concentrations can be toxic, and excess H2S is predominately removed by the stringently regulated mitochondrial sulfur oxidation pathway [43]. H2S catabolism is initiated by the mitochondrial matrix flavoprotein sulfide quinone oxidoreductase (SQR), which oxidizes H2S to form an SQR-persulfide intermediate. The persulfide is then transferred to glutathione to form glutathione persulfide, which is further oxidized by the ethylmalonic encephalopathy 1 or thiosulfate sulfurtransferase proteins to form sulfite or thiosulfate, respectively [43,44,45]. The sulfite and thiosulfate are ultimately excreted in the urine [46]. The electrons released by SQR enter complex III of the electron transport chain and are used to generate ATP, making H2S an inorganic compound capable driving mitochondrial ATP synthesis [47]. Outside of this review, however, polysulfides can be synthesized by all three H2S-sythesizing enzymes and increasingly have been found to play important functions in many physiologic and pathophysiologic processes [29,48,49].

3. Life’s Origin and H2S

3.1. Life’s Origin and H2S

Biochemical, fossil, and molecular clock dating methods indicate that life first appeared 3.7 to 4.2 billion years ago in a reducing, ferruginous, and euxinic environment probably at hydrothermal vents rich in NH3, N2, CO2, CO, CH4, H2, H2S, and dissolved metals, especially Fe2+ and Mn2+ [50,51,52,53,54,55]. Due to the fact of its ubiquity on the early Earth and versatile chemistry, H2S likely played an essential role in prebiotic chemistry and the emergence of life [52,54,55]. Support for this comes from analyses demonstrating that reactive oxygen and reactive sulfur species detoxifying mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, some four billion years ago, and have continued to the present in the biochemistry of the Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya [50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Since genomic stability maintenance is an ancient and absolute requirement for life, and H2S biochemistry is similarly ancient and ubiquitous, it is very likely that H2S functioned in the earliest biochemical pathways including in those regulating genomic stability [1,2,3,11,12,13,17,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].

3.2. H2S and the DNA Damage Response

The DNA damage response (DDR) comprises a complex network of cellular pathways that cooperatively detect DNA damage, signals its presence, and promotes DNA repair, maintaining genomic stability [1,2,3]. Phylogenomic analyses indicate that many elements of the Eukaryotic DDR are ancient, appearing in the first Metazoa and subsequently undergoing evolutionary diversification [59].
Extensive evidence indicates that H2S affects cell DNA stability, impinging on the DDR and cell viability. For example, when the nuclei from Chinese hamster ovary cells were treated 2 h with 1 μM Na2S, they exhibited significant DNA damage that was attenuated by treatment with the antioxidant butyl-hydroxyanisole [60]. Treatment of two glioblastoma cell lines with a high amount of Na2S (476 μM) for 4 h, increased DNA damage, oxidative stress levels, and increased γ-H2AX foci formation [61]. Additionally, treatment of human intestinal epithelial cells with very high (1–2 mM) Na2S induced DNA breaks as measured by the comet assay [62]. Similarly, human lung fibroblasts treated 12 h with 10 μM NaHS showed micronuclei formation, increased p21, p53, Bax, cytochrome c, Ku-70 and Ku-80 expression, and a G1 checkpoint response [63]. These studies implicate H2S in the DDR as; (1) broken DNA activates the DDR, (2) γ-H2AX foci formation requires the activities of the DDR proteins ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK, (3) the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer associates with DNA-PK to promote DNA repair, and (4) the ATM kinase is required for the oxidative stress-induced G1 checkpoint response and rapid p53 induction [1,2,3,64].
Other studies have shown that H2S can increase/preserve DNA stability. For example, in a murine model, a unilateral nephrectomy with contralateral ureteral obstruction suppressed H2S kidney levels and caused more DNA damage in CSE deficient mice compared to wild-type mice, indicating that CSE expression plays a role in maintaining DNA stability upon ischemia/reperfusion injury [65]. Additionally, daily injection of the H2S donor diallyl sulfide intraperitoneally into female rats at 50 mg/kg induced p53, Gadd45a, PCNA, and DNA polymerase δ in their breast tissue, suggesting that H2S enhances breast tissue DNA repair capacity [66]. Interestingly, exogenous H2S also affects the mitochondrial genome. For example, CSE deficient murine smooth muscle and aortic tissue showed reduced mitochondrial DNA copy numbers, mitochondrial content, mitochondrial-specific mRNAs (MT-CO1, CytB, and Atp 6), and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) mRNA and protein expression, and it elevated DNA methyltransferase 3A (Dnmt3a) expression, accompanied by increased global DNA methylation with increased TFAM promoter methylation [67]. Treatment with 30 and 60 μM NaSH for 48 h reversed these effects, with increased mitochondrial marker expression (mitochondrial DNA copy numbers, mRNAs, and mitochondrial content) and decreased Dnmt3a and TFAM promoter methylation, increasing TFAM expression [67]. This study indicates that CSE-derived H2S plays an important role in the maintenance of mitochondrial function and genomic stability. Lastly, 30–100 nM concentrations of AP39, a mitochondria-targeted H2S donor, increased endothelial cell H2S levels and stimulated mitochondrial electron transport and bioenergetic functions. Treatment of the endothelial cells with oxidative stress increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), reduced cell viability, suppressed cellular bioenergetics, and increased mitochondrial DNA damage, events reversed by 100 nM AP39 treatment [68]. Taken together, these studies indicate that under different conditions H2S can increase DNA damage or suppress it and also impinges on the DDR. A caveat to keep in mind is that many experimental procedures in these studies used high concentrations of H2S donors that are likely non-physiologic [61,62]. Additionally, many studies of H2S biology use H2S synthesis inhibitors that have low specificity, complicating experimental result interpretation (reviewed in [69]).

4. H2S and Mitochondrial DNA Repair

The mitochondria are the major cellular site for ROS generation, and the mitochondrial genome is subject to significant DNA, protein, and lipid oxidative damage [70]. Mitochondrial DNA repair is distinct from and, in general, less complex than the nuclear DNA repair systems. For example, base-excision repair (BER) predominates, while nucleotide excision repair (NER) is absent [5,71]. Moreover, mitochondrial genomes with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) breaks are usually rapidly degraded, leading to a drop in genome copy number, which are replaced through non-cleaved genome replication, often leading to a shift in heteroplasmy [5]. A role for H2S in mitochondrial function is well established with, for example, the mitochondrial H2S donor AP39 promoting mitochondrial bioenergetics and genomic stability and in the face of exogenous oxidants [68]. Additionally, in ovarian cancer cell lines, CBS expression maintains mitofusin-2 expression, with CBS knockdown lowering mitofusin-2 expression, causing mitochondrial fragmentation with a fused spherical morphology and increased unbranched mitochondria [72]. Mitofusin-2 exerts anti-apoptotic effects, and its ablation is lethal in mice [73]. Interestingly, its expression is lower in obesity, diabetes, and in animal models prone to atherosclerosis, and is increased by weight loss and exercise [73].
The apyrimidinic/apurinic endonuclease 1 (APE1), exonuclease G (EXOG), DNA Ligase III (LIG3), and DNA polymerase gamma (Pol γ) play central roles in mitochondrial BER [4,11,74,75,76]. Loss of these proteins has severe often lethal effects. For example, EXOG depletion induces persistent single-stranded DNA breaks leading to apoptosis, while APE1 ablation is embryonic lethal, and its removal by Cre expression causes apoptotic cell death within 24 h [74,75]. In the A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line, siRNA knockdown of CBS, CSE, or 3-MST or treatment with the CSE-specific inhibitor D, L-propargylglycine (PAG) combined with exogenous oxidative stress significantly increased mitochondrial DNA damage [11]. Interestingly, the interactions of EXOG with APE1, LIG3, and POL were all attenuated with CBS, CSE, or 3-MST knockdown or pharmacologic CBS inhibition by aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA) [11]. The interactions of EXOG with APE1 or LIG3 following AOAA treatment were restored and mitochondrial DNA damage was reduced with AP39 co-treatment, demonstrating that mitochondrial H2S restored these interactions and increased mitochondrial genomic stability [11]. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed that EXOG Cys 76 was sulfhydrated, with the H2S donor NaHS increasing EXOC and APE1 interactions. Mutation of EXOG Cys 76 to alanine lowered its interactions with APE1 and made the interaction insensitive to NaHS treatment [11]. Thus, this elegant study demonstrated that mitochondrial H2S plays a central role in mitochondrial genomic stability and DNA repair.

5. H2S and Nuclear DNA Repair: ATR and MEK1

5.1. ATR

Nuclear DNA repair and the DDR involve at least five major pathways comprising BER, NER, mismatch excision repair, homologous recombination, and non-homologous end joining [1,2,3]. The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated, and RAD3-related serine/threonine protein kinase (ATR) plays a central role in the DDR, where it stabilizes single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at stalled replication forks, lowers replication stress, initiates cell cycle checkpoints, and promotes faithful anaphase chromosomal segregation [1,2,3,12]. Interestingly, increased ATR/phospho-ATR expression is a poor prognostic factor in breast, bladder, and ovarian cancers [77,78,79]. Analysis of a colon adenocarcinoma cell lines with wild-type and biallelic knock-in hypomorphic ATR Seckel syndrome 1 genes revealed lower cellular H2S levels in the mutant cells compared to the wild type [12]. ATR inhibition with the pharmacologic ATR inhibitor NU6027 also significantly lowered cellular H2S levels in the wild-type but not the mutant cells [12]. Treatment of both cell lines with the CBS/CSE inhibitor β-cyano-L-alanine suppressed H2S levels in both cell types, demonstrating that cellular H2S levels are regulated by CBS/CSE and ATR, which form separate regulatory foci [12].
Interestingly, ATR activation correlates with serine 435 phosphorylation, an event also required for ATR-XPA dimer formation and subsequent NER [12,80]. Treatment of the colon adenocarcinoma cell lines with β-cyano-L-alanine increased this phosphorylation, while treatment with the H2S donor diallyl trisulfide significantly suppressed it in the wild-type but not mutant cells. UV light and oxidative stress treatments similarly induced this phosphorylation in the wild-type but not mutant cells [12]. Activated ATR phosphorylates the CHK1 kinase serine 345, leading to its activation [1,2,3,12]. When the cells lines were pretreated with β-cyano-L-alanine, followed by a low concentration of oxidative stress, oxidative stress-induced CHK1 phosphorylation increased with H2S synthesis inhibition, an event again not seen in the mutant cells [12]. Lastly, to examine the effects of these events on genomic stability, oxidative stress-induced dsDNA breaks were quantified in both cell types with and without H2S synthesis inhibition by β-cyano-L-alanine treatment. H2S synthesis inhibition caused low levels of oxidative stress to significantly induce dsDNA breaks, where otherwise they were not increased [12]. The mutant cells also showed increased breaks compare to the wild-type cells [12]. Taken together, these finding indicate that ATR regulates cellular H2S levels and H2S, in turn, regulates ATR phosphorylation, ATR kinase activity, and nuclear genomic stability [12].

5.2. MEK1

An important initial and required step in the DDR is carried out by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPS) that transfer ADP-ribose from NAD+ to glutamic acid residues on a protein acceptor, creating ADP-ribose polymers at sights of DNA damage [1,2,3,81]. These chains function in the recruitment of factors involved in DNA repair such as polymerase β, XRCC1, and ligase IIIα [1,2,3,82]. PARP activation is tightly regulated by a cascade of kinases including the MEK/ERK signaling pathway [1,2,3,82,83,84]. In an interesting study, treatment of human endothelial cells for 2 h with 10 μM NaHS increased MEK1 Cys 341 S-sulfhydration. This event resulted in ERK1/2 phosphorylation and its subsequent translocation into the nucleus, where it activated PARP-1 through a direct interaction [13]. Mutation of MEK1 Cys 341 to Gly blocked these events.
Next HEK293 cells were treated with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), which induces ssDNA and dsDNA breaks and activates PARP-1 activity, with PARP-1 then recruiting XRCC1 and DNA ligase III to initiate DNA repair [13,83,84,85]. MMS treatment of the HEK293 cells resulted in MEK1 Cys 341 S-sulfhydration, but not in cells carrying the Gly 341 mutated MEK1 [13]. This S-sulfhydration increased in CSE over-expressing HEK293 cells. Lastly, application of MMS to human endothelial cells, with and without co-treatment with 0.1–10 μM NaHS, increased PARP-1 activity in a dose-dependent manner, with PARP-1 activation detectable at 5 min with NaHS treatment and only at 30 min without NaHS treatment [13]. NaHS treatment also reduced the amount of HEK293 cell DNA damage and increased the amounts of XRCC1 and DNA ligase III recruited [13]. This study indicates that CSE-generated H2S acts as a DNA damage protectant, S-sulfhydrating MEK1 Cys 341, activating ERK1/2 and PARP-1 to repair DNA damage [13].
These studies on the roles of ATR and MEK1 in nuclear DNA repair demonstrate that H2S plays an important and, as yet, poorly defined role in nuclear DNA repair regulation [12,13]. Interestingly, low cellular H2S concentrations activate ATR, as measured by its kinase activity towards CHK1 [12]. Conversely, MEK1 activity in DNA repair is increased with increased H2S concentrations, as supplied either by exogenous NaHS or increased CSE expression [13]. Thus, these studies imply that nuclear DNA repair is likely modulated by both increased and decreased cellular H2S concentrations [12,13]. Additionally, CBS and CSE knockdown both attenuated the mitochondrial interactions of EXOG with APE1, LIG3, and POL γ, implying that ATR may also indirectly regulate mitochondrial BER [11,12].

6. H2S, Autophagy, and the DDR

Recently, Jiang et al. employed a high-content screen of ~12,000 with diversified chemical structures and molecular targets, screening for compounds that increased cellular H2S expression > 1.4 with a concomitant >50% cell survival compared to DMSO treated controls [85]. Interestingly, the largest activating compound class screened consisted of genotoxic compounds, with the most active compounds being the topoisomerase inhibitors irinotecan and teniposide, the nucleoside analog trifluridine, and bleomycin. Additionally, UVC light, ionizing radiation, and NER deficiency were also strong intracellular H2S inducers. Intriguingly, teniposide and UVC treatment increased the cellular sulfane sulfur fraction, indicating that the larger sulfur pool was also altered by genotoxic stress [85]. To further characterize the role of the DDR in these responses, immortalized murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), with and without PARP-1 expression, were treated with UVC or teniposide [85]. PARP-1 loss significantly decreased H2S induction by either agent, strongly implicating a role for early DDR events in H2S induction [85].
Autophagy is a significant part of the DDR [86]. In MEFs knockdown of ATG5 and ATG7, two autophagy regulators, attenuated LC3I to LC3II conversion (also an autophagy marker) initiated by teniposide. Importantly, this was accompanied by a concomitant decrease in H2S induction, linking H2S induction, the DDR, and autophagy [85]. ATG5 knockout MEF viability (which showed teniposide hypersensitivity) was partially rescued from teniposide toxicity by concomitant AP39 treatment, indicating that H2S plays a cellular protective role in genotoxic exposure [85]. AMPK is activated by PARP-1 and is another DDR mediator [86]. In AMPK, double α1/α2 subunit knockout MEFs, H2S and autophagy induction with teniposide were also attenuated, again consistent with a requirement for autophagy in maximal H2S induction by genoclastic agents [85].
Lastly, teniposide treatment significantly induced CSE mRNA and protein in MEFs. CSE expression ablation resulted in a small but significant decrease in cellular H2S levels with teniposide treatment, indicating a possible role of CSE in the DDR [85]. Under genotoxic stress CSE mRNA is induced by the ATF4 transcription factor [87]. In MEFs, ATF4 expression ablation resulted in both attenuated CSE induction and lowered cellular H2S levels following teniposide treatment. Additionally, treatment of wild-type and ATG5 knockout MEFs with PAG decreased teniposide-induced H2S in both cell types. These results suggest an additive role for ATF4-mediated CSE expression and autophagy in H2S induction upon genotoxic stress [85]. These interactions are summarized in Figure 1.

7. Conclusions and Future Directions: Cancer Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease

The role of H2S in DNA repair and the DDR is an established, but as yet under researched area with few studies on the subject [11,12,13,85]. Due to the importance of genomic stability maintenance, DNA repair, and H2S in normal and pathophysiology, a better understanding of this area will undoubtedly lead to a greater understanding of the molecular pathology underlying many human diseases. For example, increased DNA damage in the vasculature is a major cardiovascular disease risk factor, and H2S is a major regulator of cardiovascular functions [14,88]. However, there is relatively little data on the role of the DDR and DNA repair in the cardiovascular system, although intriguingly murine models of defective NER show premature vascular senescence, increased vascular stiffness, and elevated blood pressure [89]. As the ATR kinase regulates NER, there may be an as yet undiscovered role for ATR in vascular diseases [1,2,3,12,89]. Additionally, the DDR protein ATM plays a poorly defined role in cardiovascular disease, with individuals and mice with only one functional ATM gene showing elevated cardiovascular disease, while a high fat diet suppresses ATM protein expression in wild-type animals [90,91]. A role for ATM in H2S metabolism has not yet been identified.
Increased H2S synthesis and CBS, CSE, and/or 3-MST expression promote cancer progression in several human malignancies, and H2S synthesis inhibitors have been proposed as a cancer treatment [5,11,12,17,69,92,93]. In addition, ATR inhibitors are showing promise in phase I and II clinical trials for lung, ovarian, cervical, urothelial, and advanced sold tumors [93]. Since ATR inhibition lowers cellular H2S concentrations, this may be an unexamined aspect of ATR inhibition in cancer therapeutics [12,92,93]. Similarly, lowered cellular H2S levels with ATR inhibition could, in turn, lower MEK1 and EXOG sulfhydration and activation, attenuating mitochondrial DNA repair and nuclear DNA repair mediated by the MEK1–ERK1/2–PARP-1 axis [11,12,13]. Interestingly, ATR inhibition increases the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy, supporting this hypothesis [94,95,96]. Thus, H2S may form a molecular link uniting different aspects of DNA repair (summarized in Figure 1).
Previously, we reviewed the role of H2S in DNA repair with an emphasis on ATR function [69]. Here, we extended this review, as current data strongly implicate a role for other DDR proteins, especially ATM in H2S regulation [1,2,3,62,63,64]. Additionally, the data by Jiang et al. demonstrate that H2S, autophagy, and the DDR are intricately interconnected, further highlighting the function of H2S in the most basic functions regulating cell survival [85]. Support for this also comes from the known roles of the DDR proteins in regulating autophagy [85,97].
ATR, ATM, and DNA-PK are central to the DRR and DNA repair [1,2,3,95,96]. All three proteins share extensive sequence and substrate overlap, and synthetic lethal relationships exist between them [1,2,3,96]. Moreover, all three proteins regulate autophagy and mitochondrial function and viability [97,98,99,100]. These observations, combined with the ancient and parallel origins of H2S biochemistry and DNA repair, and with H2S now linked to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA repair, suggest that ATM and DNA-PK may also regulate aspects of H2S metabolism [1,2,3,11,12,13,17,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Although only hypotheses, these ideas could be easily tested. In summary, the role of H2S in the regulation of the DDR and DNA repair is a new and exciting area of inquiry and should give useful and profound insights into normal and pathophysiology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and research were performed by all the authors, R.E.S., C.G.K., Y.L., and G.E.G., C.G.K. and R.E.S. wrote the main portion of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work supported by grants from the A-T Children’s Project and an intramural research support grant from Louisiana Health Sciences Shreveport, Center for Cardiovascular Diseases and Sciences. Lastly, this work was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences of the NIH under grant numbers GM121307 and HL149264 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to C.G.K.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Lisa LaChance, MBA, for her help in the assembly and proofreading of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hanawalt, P.C. Historical perspective on the DNA damage response. DNA Repair 2015, 36, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Saldivar, J.C.; Cortez, D.; Karlene, A.; Cimprich, K.A. The essential kinase ATR: Ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 622–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hustedt, N.; Durocher, D. The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Houten, B.V.; Hunter, S.E.; Meyer, J.N. Mitochondrial DNA damage induced autophagy, cell death, and disease. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, Y.; Tigano, M.; Agnel Sfeir, A. Safeguarding mitochondrial genomes in higher eukaryotes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020, 27, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mills, E.L.; Kelly, B.; O’Neill, L.A.J. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. West, A.P.; Khoury-Hanold, W.; Staron, M.; Tal, M.C.; Pineda, C.M.; Lang, S.M.; Smith, M.B.; Duguay, B.A.; Raimundo, N.; Macduff, D.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature 2015, 520, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, R. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: Can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter? FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1792–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Nagy, P. Mechanistic chemical perspective of hydrogen sulfide signaling. Methods Enzymol. 2015, 554, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abe, K.; Kimura, H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Szczesny, B.; Marcatti, M.; Zatarain, J.R.; Druzhyna, N.; Wiktorowicz, J.E.; Nagy, P.; Hellmich, M.R.; Szabo, C. Inhibition of hydrogen sulfide biosynthesis sensitizes lung adenocarcinoma to chemotherapeutic drugs by inhibiting mitochondrial DNA repair and suppressing cellular bioenergetics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, J.; Shen, X.; Pardue, S.; Meram, A.T.; Rajendran, S.; Ghali, G.; Kevil, C.G.; Shackelford., R.E. The Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related protein kinase regulates cellular hydrogen sulfide concentrations. DNA Repair 2019, 73, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Ju, S.; Li, Z.; Altaany, R.; Wang, G.; Yang, G. S-sulfhydration of MEK1 leads to PARP-1 activation and DNA damage repair. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kolluru, G.; Shen, X.; Kevil, C.G. Reactive sulfur species: A new redox player in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 874–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Głowacka, U.; Brzozowski, T.; Magierowski, M. Synergisms, discrepancies and interactions between hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide in the gastrointestinal and digestive system physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kumar, M.; Sandhir, R. Hydrogen sulfide in physiological and pathological mechanisms in brain. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2018, 17, 654–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shackelford, R.E.; Mohammad, I.Z.; Meram, A.T.; Kim, D.; Alotaibi, F.; Patel, S.; Ghali, G.; Kevil, C.G. Molecular functions of hydrogen sulfide in cancer. Pathophysiology 2021, 28, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reiffenstein, R.J.; Hulbert, W.C.; Roth, S.H. Toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxocol. 1992, 32, 109–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kolluru, G.K.; Shen, X.; Bir, S.C.; Kevil, C.G. Hydrogen sulfide chemical biology: Pathophysiological roles and detection. Nitric Oxide 2013, 35, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nicholson, R.A.; Roth, S.H.; Zhang, A.; Brookes, J.; Skrajny, B.; Bennington, R. Inhibition of respiratory and bioenergetic mechanisms by hydrogen sulfide in mammalian brain. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 1998, 54, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Warenycia, M.W.; Smith, K.A.; Blashko, C.S.; Kombian, S.B.; Reiffenstein, R.J. Monoamine oxidase inhibition as a sequel of hydrogen sulfide intoxication: Increases in brain catecholamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine levels. Arch. Toxicol. 1989, 63, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cuevasanta, E.; Denicola, A.; Alvarez, B.; Moller, M.N. Solubility and permeation of hydrogen sulfide in lipid membranes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jennings, M.L. Transport of H2S and HS− across the human red blood cell membrane: Rapid H2S diffusion and AE1-mediated Cl−/HS− exchange. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2013, 305, C941–C950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Czyzewski, B.K.; Wang, D.N. Identification and characterization of a bacterial hydrosulphide ion channel. Nature 2012, 483, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kimura, Y.; Kimura, H. Hydrogen sulfide protects neurons from oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1165–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Whiteman, M.; Armstrong, J.S.; Chu, S.H.; Jia-Ling, S.; Wong, B.S.; Cheung, N.S.; Halliwell, B.; Moore, P.K. The novel neuromodulator hydrogen sulfide: An endogenous peroxynitrite ‘scavenger’? J. Neurochem. 2004, 90, 765–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xie, Z.Z.; Liu, Y.; Bian, J.S. Hydrogen sulfide and cellular redox homeostasis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 6043038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Vitvitsky, V.; Kabil, O.; Banerjee, R. High turnover rates for hydrogen sulfide allow for rapid regulation of its tissue concentrations. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Carballal, S.; Trujillo, M.; Cuevasanta, E.; Bartesaghi, S.; Möller, M.N.; Folkes, L.K.; García-Bereguiaín, M.A.; Gutiérrez-Merino, C.; Wardman, P.; Denicola, A.; et al. Reactivity of hydrogen sulfide with peroxynitrite and other oxidants of biological interest. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Orlowski, A. Hydroghne sulfur comme produit de certaines bacteries. J. Med. Milit. Russe 1897, 11, 528. [Google Scholar]
  31. Calvert, J.W.; Coetzee, W.A.; Lefer, D.J. Novel insights into hydrogen sulfide--mediated cytoprotection. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2010, 12, 1203–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hosoki, R.; Matsuki, N.; Kimura, H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous smooth muscle relaxant in synergy with nitric oxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 237, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shibuya, N.; Tanaka, M.; Yoshida, M.; Ogasawara, Y.; Togawa, T.; Ishii, K.; Kimura, H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase produces hydrogen sulfide and bound sulfane sulfur in the brain. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H.; Paul, B.D. Regulators of the transsulfuration pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Braunstein, A.E.; Goryachenkova, E.V.; Tolosa, E.A.; Willhardt, I.H.; Yefremova, L.L. Specificity and some other properties of liver serine sulphhydrase: Evidence for its identity with cystathionine-synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1971, 242, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Singh, S.; Madzelan, P.; Stasser, J.; Weeks, C.L.; Becker, D.; Spiro, T.G.; Penner-Hahn, J.; Banerjee, R. Modulation of the heme electronic structure and cystathionine beta-synthase activity by second coordination sphere ligands: The role of heme ligand switching in redox regulation. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009, 103, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Jhee, K.H.; Kruger, W.D. The role of cystathionine beta-synthase in homocysteine metabolism. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chiku, T.; Padovani, D.; Zhu, W.; Singh, S.; Vitvitsky, V.; Banerjee, R. H2S biogenesis by human cystathionine gamma-lyase leads to the novel sulfur metabolites lanthionine and homolanthionine and is responsive to the grade of hyperhomocysteinemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 11601–11612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Nagahara, N.; Ito, T.; Kitamura, H.; Nishino, T. Tissue and subcellular distribution of mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase in the rat: Confocal laser fluorescence and immunoelectron microscopic studies combined with biochemical analysis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 1998, 110, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shibuya, N.; Koike, S.; Tanaka, M.; Ishigami-Yuasa, M.; Kimura, Y.; Ogasawara, Y.; Fukui, K.; Nagahara, N.; Kimura, H. A novel pathway for the production of hydrogen sulfide from D-cysteine in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, J.; Minkler, P.; Grove, D.; Wang, R.; Willard, B.; Dweik, R.; Hine, C. Non-enzymatic hydrogen sulfide production from cysteine in blood is catalyzed by iron and vitamin B6. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shen, X.; Carlström, M.; Borniquel, S.; Jädert, C.; Kevil, C.G.; Lundberg, J.O. Microbial regulation of host hydrogen sulfide bioavailability and metabolism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 60, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lagoutte, E.; Mimoun, S.; Andriamihaja, M.; Chaumontet, C.; Blachier, F.; Bouillaud, F. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide remains a priority in mammalian cells and causes reverse electron transfer in colonocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1797, 1500–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rose, P.; Moore, P.K.; Zhu, Y.Z. H2S biosynthesis and catabolism: New insights from molecular studies. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 1391–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jackson, M.R.; Melideo, S.L.; Jorns, M.S. Human sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase catalyzes the first step in hydrogen sulfide metabolism and produces a sulfane sulfur metabolite. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 6804–6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maseda, C.; Hayakawa, A.; Okuda, K.; Asari, M.; Tanaka, H.; Yamada, H.; Jin, S.; Horioka, K.; Matoba, K.; Shiono, H.; et al. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of thiosulfate in human blood and urine as an indicator of hydrogen sulfide poisoning. Leg. Med. 2017, 24, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Goubern, M.; Andriamihaja, M.; Nübel, T.; Blachier, F.; Bouillaud, F. Sulfide, the first inorganic substrate for human cells. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 1699–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kimura, Y.; Toyofuku, Y.; Koike, S.; Shibuya, N.; Nagahara, N.; Lefer, D.; Ogasawara, Y.; Kimura, H. Identification of H2S3 and H2S produced by 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase in the brain. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Fukuto, J.M.; Ignarro, L.J.; Nagy, P.; Wink, D.A.; Kevil, C.G.; Feelisch, M.; Cortese-Krott, M.M.; Bianco, C.L.; Kumagai, Y.; Hobbs, A.J.; et al. Biological hydropersulfides and related polysulfides—A new concept and perspective in redox biology. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 2140–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Dodd, M.S.; Papineau, D.; Grenne, T.; Slack, J.F.; Rittner, M.; Pirajno, F.; O’Neil, J.; Little, C.T.S. Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Nature 2017, 543, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nutman, A.P.; Bennett, V.C.; Friend, C.R.L.; Kranendonk, M.J.V.; Chivas, A.R. Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature 2016, 537, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mißbach, H.; Duda, J.P.; van den Kerkhof, A.M.; Lüders, V.; Pack, A.; Reitner, J.M.; Thiel, V. Ingredients for microbial life preserved in 3.5 billion-year-old fluid inclusions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martin, W.; Baross, J.; Kelley, D.; Russell, M.J. Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kasting, J.F. Earth’s early atmosphere. Science 1993, 259, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tabibzadeh, S. Nature creates, adapts, protects and sustains life using hydrogen sulfide. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 528–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. DeLeon, E.R.; Gao, Y.; Huang, E.; Arif, M.; Arora, N.; Divietro, A.; Patel, S.; Olson, K.R. A case of mistaken identity: Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species? Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2016, 310, R549–R560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tetz, V.V.; Tetz, G.V. A new biological definition of life. Biomol. Concepts 2020, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Aroca, A.; Gotor, C.; Bassham, D.C.; Romero, L.C. Hydrogen sulfide: From a toxic molecule to a key molecule of cell life. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brown, J.R.; Auger, K.R. Phylogenomics of phosphoinositide lipid kinases: Perspectives on the evolution of second messenger signaling and drug discovery. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Attene-Ramos, M.S.; Wagner, E.D.; Gaskins, H.R.; Plewa, M.J. Hydrogen sulfide induces direct radical-associated DNA damage. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xiao, A.Y.; Maynard, M.R.; Piett, C.G.; Nagel, Z.D.; Alexander, J.S.; Kevil, C.G.; Berridge, M.V.; Pattillo, C.B.; Rosen, L.R.; Miriyala, S.; et al. Sodium sulfide selectively induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction and radiosensitizes glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Redox Biol. 2019, 26, 101220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Attene-Ramos, M.S.; Nava, G.M.; Muellner, M.G.; Wagner, E.D.; Plewa, M.J.; Gaskins, R.S. DNA damage and toxicogenomic analyses of hydrogen sulfide in human intestinal epithelial FHs 74 Int cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2010, 51, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Baskar, R.; Li, L.; Moore, P.K. Hydrogen sulfide-induces DNA damage and changes in apoptotic gene expression in human lung fibroblast cells. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shackelford, R.E.; Innes, C.L.; Sieber, S.O.; Heinloth, A.N.; Leadon, S.; Paules, R.S. The Ataxia telangiectasia gene product is required for oxidative stress-induced G1 and G2 checkpoint function in human fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 21951–21959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Han, S.J.; Noh, M.R.; Jung, J.M.; Ishii, I.; Yoo, J.; Kim, J.I.; Park, K.M. H2S-producing cystathionine γ-lyase is critical in the progression of kidney fibrosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 112, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Green, M.; Newell, O.; Aboyade-Cole, A.; Darling-Reed, S.; Thomas, R.D. Diallyl sulfide induces the expression of nucleotide excision repair enzymes in the breast of female ACI rats. Toxicol. Lett. 2007, 168, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, S.; Yang, G. Hydrogen sulfide maintains mitochondrial DNA replication via demethylation of TFAM. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015, 32, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Szczesny, B.; Módis, K.; Yanagi, K.; Coletta, C.; Trionnaire, S.L.; Perry, A.; Wood, M.E.; Whiteman, M.; Szabo, C. AP39, a novel mitochondria-targeted H2S donor, stimulates cellular bioenergetics, exerts cytoprotective effects and protects against the loss of mitochondrial DNA integrity in oxidatively stressed endothelial cells in vitro. Nitric Oxide 2014, 41, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Shackelford, R.; Ozluk, E.; Islam, M.K.; Hopper, B.; Meram, A.; Ghali, G.; Kevil, C.G. Hydrogen sulfide and DNA repair. Redox. Biol. 2021, 38, 101675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cadenas, E.; Davies, K.J. Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress, and aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kazak, L.; Reyes, A.; Holt, I.J. Minimizing the damage: Repair pathways keep mitochondrial DNA intact. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chakraborty, P.K.; Murphy, B.; Mustafi, S.B.; Dey, A.; Xiong, X.; Rao, G.; Naz, S.; Zhang, M.; Yang, D.; Dhanasekaran, D.N.; et al. Cystathionine beta-synthase regulates mitochondrial morphogenesis in ovarian cancer. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 4145–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Chandhok, G.; Lazarou, M.; Neumann, B. Structure, function, and regulation of mitofusin-2 in health and disease. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2018, 93, 933–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Sykora, P.; Wilson, D.M., 3rd; Bohr, V.A. Repair of persistent strand breaks in the mitochondrial genome. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2012, 133, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Tann, A.W.; Boldogh, I.; Meiss, G.; Qian, W.; Van Houten, V.; Mitra, S.; Szczesny, B. Apoptosis induced by persistent single-strand breaks in mitochondrial genome: Critical role of EXOG (5′-EXO/endonuclease) in their repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31975–31983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Izumi, T.; Brown, D.B.; Naidu, C.V.; Bhakat, K.K.; MacInnes, M.A.; Saito, H.; Chen, D.J.; Mitra, S. Two essential but distinct functions of the mammalian abasic endonuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5739–5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Abdel-Fatah, T.M.A.; Middleton, F.K.; Arora, A.; Agarwal, D.; Chen, T.; Moseley, P.M.; Perry, C.; Doherty, R.; Chan, S.; Green, A.R.; et al. Untangling the ATR-CHEK1 network for prognostication, prediction and therapeutic target validation in breast cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2015, 9, 569–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Feng, W.; Dean, D.C.; Hornicek, F.J.; Wang, J.; Jia, Y.; Duan, Z.; Shi, H. ATR and p-ATR are emerging prognostic biomarkers and DNA damage response targets in ovarian cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020, 12, 1758835920982853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, C.-C.; Yang, J.-C.; Lu, M.-C.; Lee, C.-L.; Peng, C.-Y.; Hsu, W.-Y.; Dai, Y.-H.; Chang, F.-R.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Wu, W.-J. ATR-Chk1 signaling inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to enhance cisplatin chemosensitivity in urothelial bladder cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 1947–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Jarrett, S.G.; Horrell, E.M.W.; Christian, P.A.; Vanover, J.C.; Boulanger, M.C.; Zou, Y.; D’Orazio, J.A. PKA-mediated phosphorylation of ATR promotes recruitment of XPA to UV-induced DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 999–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Shilovsky, G.A.; Khokhlov, A.N.; Shram, S.I. The protein poly (ADP-ribosyl) ation system: Its role in genome stability and lifespan determination. Biochemistry 2013, 78, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Abdallah, Y.; Gligorievski, D.; Kasseckert, S.A.; Dieterich, L.; Schäfer, M.; Kuhlmann, C.R.; Noll, T.; Sauer, H.; Piper, H.M.; Schäfer, C. The role of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in the autonomous proliferative response of endothelial cells to hypoxia. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007, 73, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cohen-Armon, M.; Visochek, L.; Rozensal, D.; Kalal, A.; Geistrikh, I.; Klein, R.; Bendetz-Nezer, S.; Yao, Z.; Seger, R. DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: A link to histone acetylation. Mol. Cell 2007, 25, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kauppinen, T.M.; Chan, W.Y.; Suh, S.W.; Wiggins, A.K.; Huang, E.J.; Swanson, R.A. Direct phosphorylation and regulation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 7136–7141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Jiang, X.; MacArthur, M.R.; Treviño-Villarreal, J.H.; Kip, P.; Ozaki, C.K.; Mitchell, S.J.; Mitchell, J.R. Intracellular H2S production is an autophagy-dependent adaptive response to DNA damage. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Eliopoulos, A.G.; Havaki, S.; Gorgoulis, V.G. DNA damage response and autophagy: A meaningful partnership. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Gao, X.H.; Krokowski, D.; Guan, B.J.; Bederman, I.; Majumder, M.; Parisien, M.; Diatchenko, L.; Kabil, O.; Willard, B.; Banerjee, R.; et al. Quantitative H2S-mediated protein sulfhydration reveals metabolic reprogramming during the integrated stress response. eLife 2015, 4, e10067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bautista-Niño, P.K.; Portilla-Fernandez, E.; Vaughan, D.E.; Danser, A.H.J.; Roks, A.J.M. DNA Damage: A main determinant of vascular aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Durik, M.; Kavousi, M.; van der Pluijm, I.; Isaacs, A.; Cheng, C.; Verdonk, K.; Loot, A.E.; Oeseburg, H.; Bhaggoe, U.M.; Roks, A.J.; et al. Nucleotide excision DNA repair is associated with age-related vascular dysfunction. Circulation 2012, 126, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Espach, Y.; Lochner, A.; Strijdom, H.; Huisamen, B. ATM protein kinase signaling, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2015, 29, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Halaby, M.J.; Hibma, J.C.; He, J.; Yang, D.Q. ATM protein kinase mediates full activation of Akt and regulates glucose transporter 4 translocation by insulin in muscle cells. Cell Signal. 2008, 20, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cao, X.; Ding, L.; Xie, Z.A.; Yang, Y.; Whiteman, M.; Moore, P.K.; Bian, J.S. A Review of hydrogen sulfide synthesis, metabolism, and measurement: Is modulation of hydrogen sulfide a novel therapeutic for cancer? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 31, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sundar, R.; Brown, J.; Russo, A.I.; Timothy, A.; Yap, T.A. Targeting ATR in cancer medicine. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2017, 41, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yap, T.A.; Sandhu, S.K.; Carden, C.P.; De Bono, J.S. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: Exploiting a synthetic lethal strategy in the clinic. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yazinski, S.A.; Comaills, V.; Buisson, R.; Genois, M.M.; Nguyen, H.D.; Ho, C.K.; Todorova Kwan, T.; Morris, R.; Lauffer, S.; Nussenzweig, A. ATR inhibition disrupts rewired homologous recombination and fork protection pathways in PARP inhibitor-resistant BRCA-deficient cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2017, 31, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Blackford, A.N.; Jackson, S.P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Anand, S.K.; Sharma, A.; Singh, N.; Kakkar, P. Entrenching role of cell cycle checkpoints and autophagy for maintenance of genomic integrity. DNA Repair 2020, 86, 102748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lee, J.H.; Paull, T.T. Mitochondria at the crossroads of ATM-mediated stress signaling and regulation of reactive oxygen species. Redox Biol. 2020, 32, 101511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Makinwa, Y.; Musich, P.; Zou, Y. Phosphorylation-dependent pin1 isomerization of ATR: Its role in regulating ATR’s anti-apoptotic function at mitochondria, and the implications in cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Park, S.J.; Gavrilova, O.; Brown, A.L.; Soto, J.E.; Bremner, S.; Kim, J.; Xu, X.; Yang, S.; Um, J.H.; Koch, L.G.; et al. DNA-PK promotes the mitochondrial, metabolic, and physical decline that occurs during aging. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 10 01820 g001 550
Figure 1. A summary of known pathways by which H2S regulates mitochondrial and nuclear DNA repair integrated into one model [11,12,13,85].
Figure 1. A summary of known pathways by which H2S regulates mitochondrial and nuclear DNA repair integrated into one model [11,12,13,85].
Antioxidants 10 01820 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shackelford, R.E.; Li, Y.; Ghali, G.E.; Kevil, C.G. Bad Smells and Broken DNA: A Tale of Sulfur-Nucleic Acid Cooperation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111820

AMA Style

Shackelford RE, Li Y, Ghali GE, Kevil CG. Bad Smells and Broken DNA: A Tale of Sulfur-Nucleic Acid Cooperation. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(11):1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shackelford, Rodney E., Yan Li, Ghali E. Ghali, and Christopher G. Kevil. 2021. "Bad Smells and Broken DNA: A Tale of Sulfur-Nucleic Acid Cooperation" Antioxidants 10, no. 11: 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111820

APA Style

Shackelford, R. E., Li, Y., Ghali, G. E., & Kevil, C. G. (2021). Bad Smells and Broken DNA: A Tale of Sulfur-Nucleic Acid Cooperation. Antioxidants, 10(11), 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop