Next Article in Journal
A Study on Myogenesis by Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Cytotoxic Activity by Selenium Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Type 2 Diabetes and Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Possible Therapeutic Options
Previous Article in Journal
Distribution and Functions of Monodehydroascorbate Reductases in Plants: Comprehensive Reverse Genetic Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Enzymes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Relationship between Type 2 Diabetes and Air Pollution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/antiox10111729
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Possible Gender Influence in the Mechanisms Underlying the Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and the Metabolic Alterations in Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes

by
Martha Lucinda Contreras-Zentella
and
Rolando Hernández-Muñoz
*
Departamento de Biología Celular y Desarrollo, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apdo. Postal 70-243, Avenida Universidad # 3000, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(11), 1729; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111729
Submission received: 23 September 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 25 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Type 2 Diabetes and Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Possible Therapeutic Options)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

The number of patients afflicted by type 2 diabetes and its morbidities has increased alarmingly, becoming the cause of many deaths. Normally, during nutrient intake, insulin secretion is increased and glucagon secretion is repressed, but when plasma glucose concentration increases, a state of prediabetes occurs. High concentration of plasma glucose breaks the redox balance, inducing an oxidative stress that promotes chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and impaired insulin secretion. In the same context, obesity is one of the most crucial factors inducing insulin resistance, inflammation, and contributing to the onset of type 2 diabetes. Measurements of metabolites like glucose, fructose, amino acids, and lipids exhibit significant predictive associations with type 2 diabetes or a prediabetes state and lead to changes in plasma metabolites that could be selectively affected by gender and age. In terms of gender, women and men have biological dissimilarities that might have an important role for the development, diagnosis, therapy, and prevention of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and relevant hazards in both genders, for type 2 diabetes. Therefore, the present review attempts to analyze the influence of gender on the relationships among inflammatory events, oxidative stress, and metabolic alterations in patients undergoing obesity and/or type 2 diabetes.

1. Introduction

The most prominent causes of death in groups of patients with obesity are cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, such as infarction and stroke [1] because of an increase in adipose tissue, which is metabolically active, and the malfunction of leptin signaling which has been associated with the atherosclerotic process [2]. Insulin resistance is one of the major pathophysiological attributes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes) and is closely related to abdominal obesity and organ lipid deposition [3]. It is characterized by reduced sensitivity of insulinotropic tissues to the action of insulin, with a failure in triggering the insulin signaling cascade, which promotes glucose uptake in muscles, and adipose tissue and increases the activity of key glucose and lipid metabolism enzymes [4]. In obese individuals, expanded adipose tissue could present a lack of oxygen availability, which causes adipose tissue death, attracting macrophages that produce inflammatory cytokines, increasing insulin resistance [5].
An excess of liver triglycerides results in ineffective β-oxidation and the production of ceramides, diacylglycerols, and acylcarnitines. This accumulation of lipid derivatives leads to inflammation and contributes to liver insulin resistance. Increasing evidence has indicated that excessive triglycerides storage is a strong inducer of chronic inflammation [6]. Hence, it has been suggested that insulin resistance, as a major pathophysiological feature of both obesity and type 2 diabetes, could play a role in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease, for its association with β-amyloid accumulation and hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein [7]. Thus, it is very likely that some pathological processes in the periphery, including inflammation, are associated with brain pathology, and this has led to the hypothesis that treatments for obesity and type 2 diabetes readily reduce the development of neuro-inflammation, probably diminishing the onset of neurodegenerative diseases (Figure 1). Among the reported treatments are, in addition to anti-diabetic drugs, the incretin hormone therapy [8] or application of the fibroblast growth factor-21 [9].
An Increase in fat intake leads to adipocytes becoming hypertrophic and to an accumulation of natural killer (NK) cells. The hypertrophic adipocytes and NK cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, which provide a chemotactic gradient for recruitment of other adaptive and innate immune cells. These pro-inflammatory molecules activate stress kinases such as IκB kinase (IKK) and Jun kinase (JNK), leading to insulin resistance. The inflammatory process and insulin resistance induce metabolic consequences in the liver (increased Kupffer cells), pancreas (accumulation of macrophages), in the brain the microglia become more inflammatory (accumulated macrophages), and gut (changes in immune populations and microflora).
The metabolic syndrome is recognized as a conjunct of risk factors that can predispose an individual to cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes, among other pathologies. Impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake is the principal abnormality that bridges the metabolic and hemodynamic disturbances found in the metabolic syndrome [10]. Impaired beta-cell function along with insulin resistance can appear years before the development of diabetes and is already present in most pre-diabetic patients [11]. Insulin resistance can lead to increased systemic blood pressure, elevated triglyceride levels, and lowered HDL levels, which can induce a macrovascular dysfunction; here, oxidative stress and inflammation promote micro-angiopathic changes that are already present in pre-diabetic states [12].
Hyperglycemia induces oxidative stress and upregulation of pro-inflammatory factors, promoting a vascular dysfunction (Figure 2). Therefore, oxidative stress may be involved in the progression from prediabetes to diabetes, impairing glucose uptake in muscle and fat cells and decreasing insulin secretion from β-cells [13]. Reduction of systemic oxidative stress through the use of NADPH-related metabolic inhibitors readily improves glucose metabolism in a mouse model [14].
Binding of insulin stimulates the association of its receptor with downstream mediators, including insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and PI3K. The PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β signaling pathway is involved in insulin signaling transduction, and GSK3β is regulated and controlled by insulin in this signaling pathway, which is related to glycogen synthesis regulation. Through specific receptors, hyperglycemia, fatty acids, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as ROS, activate JNK and IKKB favoring NF-κB translocation into the nucleus and, therefore, transcription of inflammatory genes.
Metabolomics, as the systematic analysis and study of metabolites in a biological sample, including low-molecular-weight biochemical compounds such as organic acids, amino acids, sugars, lipids, and nucleotides [15], has been utilized to assess correlations among metabolites, risk for type 2 diabetes and its symptoms [16]. Metabolomics and metabolic features interaction studies have expanded the current literature, strengthening the knowledge of the pathophysiological pathways underlying type 2 diabetes, and have allowed the identification of novel and reliable biomarkers that can markedly improve the diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes (Figure 3). Therefore, the present review was aimed to correlate type 2 diabetes with inflammatory events, oxidative stress, and changes in the metabolic pattern that participate in the physio-pathology of the disease. In particular, we tried to analyze the influence of gender in these biomedical aspects. For this, we will discuss firstly the relations of obesity with inflammatory states and with insulin resistance in Section 2 and Section 3, to focus on oxidative stress, type 2 diabetes, and a putative influence of gender (Section 4) to finally comment on interactions of inflammation and metabolic regulation in type 2 diabetes (Section 5).
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a central role in the interactions involving inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic control. Hyperglycemia increases ROS production and chronic inflammation. Altered expression of miRNAs and epigenetic regulation of oxidative stress genes are contributing factors to hyperglycemic memory. Sources of ROS include NADPH oxidase, dysfunctional endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and xanthene oxidase. Excessive production of ROS can exacerbate and contribute to the pathogenesis of insulin-resistance and impaired insulin secretion. In addition, high levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) are often associated with increased BMI levels and insulin resistance whereas low levels of BCAAs are accompanied by lower BMIs and good insulin sensitivity.

2. Obesity and Associated Pathologies Linked to Inflammation

Different pathologies, such as cardiovascular diseases, neuro-inflammation, resulting in neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes, have been associated with increased secretion of inflammation-promoting cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines are produced by different cell types and secreted into the circulation, where they regulate different tissues through their activities. There has been a great interest in determining the metabolic consequences of obesity derived from the current diet, in which foods are usually rich in carbohydrates and fats. Among the most important results obtained was the relationship observed between obesity and inflammation. The specific factors that initiate inflammation are not known completely yet and, probably, differ among diverse organs and tissues, but are associated with the activation of the innate immune system in response to cellular homeostasis alterations [17,18,19].
Obesity produces a marginal increase in the levels of the C-reactive protein and inflammatory factors that disturbs the insulin sensitivity in diverse organs, such as the pancreas, liver, heart, brain, and tissues like the adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. This type of inflammation is further linked to the development of insulin resistance [20,21] and can lead to fibrosis or necrosis [22]. Obesity and insulin resistance are major risk factors for type 2 diabetes (Figure 1).
Evidence has revealed that excessive triglycerides storage is a strong inducer of chronic inflammation [6,7,23], and chronic inflammation may be one of the possible mutual denominators of metabolic pathologies. In obese people, for example, triglycerides, normally present in adipose tissue, are accumulated in the liver producing non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This pathology causes a non-productive β-oxidation and accumulation of ceramides, diacylglycerols, and acylcarnitines, producing inflammation and resulting in liver insulin resistance [24]; progress of NAFLD can develop to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and, occasionally, to cirrhosis, as a result of inflammation and fibrosis [25] (Figure 1).
Besides, obesity provokes metabolic stress. The Kupffer cells, which are liver-specific macrophages, are stimulated, and leukocytes are incorporated to the damaged liver. These situations promote the secretion of chemokines and cytokines, mainly TNF-α and IL-6 [26]. The resulting inflammation induces dilatation of adipocytes and mechanical stress [27]. In the same way, studies in obese subjects have reported a direct relationship between inflammation and insulin resistance. Very important signaling routes are involved, like those in which NF-κB and JNK participate [28], in addition to the proinflammatory molecules, scaffolding proteins, and cytokines like TNF-α. The pentatricopeptide repeat (PRR) proteins, which belong to the family of leucine-rich repeat-containing (NLR) proteins and detect endogenous ligands produced by obesity, stimulate the cryopyrin/NLR pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, inducing the synthesis of IL-1β and IL-18 through caspase-1 in macrophages [29]. PRRs’ stimulation could regulate the production of lipids such as ceramides and sphingolipids, which stimulate inflammation, inhibiting the capability of saturated fatty acids to induce insulin resistance [22,30,31,32]; many of these pathways can interfere by blocking insulin action (Figure 1). The arachidonic acid–derived product, leukotriene B4, is released from adipocytes and recruits macrophages to the adipose tissue, attenuating insulin signaling in myocytes and hepatocytes [33]. Similarly, galectin-3, which belongs to the lectin family, is produced by macrophages; this protein is associated with inflammation and could provoke insulin resistance in muscle, liver, and fat cells, blocking insulin receptor signaling [34]. Galectin-3 is involved in broad biological functionality [35] and has been demonstrated to be involved in cancer, inflammation, and fibrosis [36].
On the other hand, the adipose tissue does not only function as energy reserve but also has an endocrine function because it is formed of various types of cells (adipocytes, pre-adipocytes, fibroblasts, and immune-competent cells) [1,37,38]. Recently, it has been hypothesized that the adipose tissue is a key tissue in the induction of inflammation, due to information sharing between the different types of cells that compose it and other immune cells that infiltrate it. Adipokines are adipocyte-specific cytokines, responsible for the energetic balance in the body. Among adipokines, the anorexigenic leptin secretion has pro-inflammatory consequences, whereas adiponectin has an anti-inflammatory effect and raises insulin sensitivity [39]. In obese subjects, the anorexigenic leptin is increased, which can be associated to insulin resistance [40,41].
Furthermore, in obese subjects, the accumulation of triglycerides increases adipose tissue mass and induces hypoxia, which can lead to cellular death; the adipocyte remnants attract macrophages. Macrophages are cells with diverse activities; in addition to having chemotactic activity, they act as antigens, secrete cytokines that are involved in cellular metabolism, very importantly, in lipid metabolism. The release of cytokines leads to inflammation, which has been postulated to be associated with predisposition to various pathologies. Macrophages undergo drastic alterations when obesity occurs. The amount of macrophages increases due a greater number of M1-polarized macrophages, which are pro-inflammatory and produce cytokines, such as TNF-α, and start the NF-κB and JNK pathways. Consequently, the ratio of M1 to M2 macrophages increases, which is considered a characteristic of the inflammation occurring in obesity and adiposis, as well as in insulin resistance and metabolic disease [42]. The immune response in obesity starts in the adipose tissue, participating T effector cells, B cells, NK cells, and others that secrete cytokines and promote inflammation [18]. Similarly, the elevated levels of free fatty acids, insulin, and glucose, observed in insulin resistance, induce macrophages activation. The macrophages remain permanently activated and promote chronic inflammation and secretion of the anorexigenic leptin [43,44].
Free fatty acids can also promote inflammation by collateral incorporation to TLR4 and TLR2 through the adaptor protein fetuin A, activating NF-κB and JNK1 [32]. In the same way, pro-inflammatory cytokines participate in insulin resistance in the adipose tissue via the activation of IκB kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase, responsible for dephosphorylating the serine of the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), turning insulin into less efficient [45]. These results confirm that obesity and metabolic syndrome co-occur with chronic subclinical inflammation that begins early in the adipose tissue [22] and then affects all cell homeostasis (Figure 1).
Research about obesity has evidenced that intestinal absorption is augmented, increasing circulation of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from the intestinal Gram-positive bacteria [46]. Given that LPS is a systemic circulating factor, it has been postulated that it might function as an amplifier of the inflammatory pathway, rather than as tissue-specific that starts the inflammation mechanism. Inflammation starts with the activation of receptors like TLR4 in fat cells and interrelated with type 2 diabetes in humans [43].

3. Obesity and Insulin Resistance

The signaling cascade of insulin is not fully understood yet. It is an intricate signaling pathway, with numerous regulatory proteins participating in it. If some of these proteins fail in their function, some tissues may become insulin resistant [47], which is associated with metabolic pathologies like obesity. In obese subjects, numerous inflammatory signals act together to stimulate serine kinases that interfere with insulin signaling. Several kinases, including, most probably, different kinases activated by stress and which can be dependent and independent of insulin, can block the insulin receptor signaling by promoting the phosphorylation of serine/threonine of insulin receptor substrates and reducing tyrosine phosphorylation; all these modifications affect downstream insulin signaling [48]. Normally, insulin binds to its tyrosine kinase receptor; tyrosines are auto-phosphorylated and initiate the signaling cascade (Figure 2). The signaling pathway includes participation of Shc (adaptor protein family) and APS proteins (adaptor molecule containing PH and SH2 domains) [49], which favor the activation by the phosphorylation of IRS-1 through the activity of kinases.
Among the kinases induced by insulin are protein kinase C, serine/threonine-protein kinase 2 (AKT2 or Akt-2; activated by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate), S6K1 (which is implicated in mTOR pathway activation), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and ROCK1 [49]. Phosphorylation of Akt-2 regulates various proteins downstream, such as rapamycin (mTOR) and glycogen synthase kinase-3β [50,51]. Other kinases independent of insulin, like AMPK and GSK3, phosphorylate IRSs, and the pathway is activated downstream [52].
Therefore, the activated IRS-1 generates signaling by attaching and stimulating phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K), the site in the pathway at which insulin and leptin intersect. In the case of obese subjects, chemokines participate in liver insulin resistance by activating the IκB kinase [53]. This enzymatic complex is upstream in the NF-κB signal transduction pathway and participates in the cellular reaction to inflammation. The IκB kinase activation depresses IRS activity and, if leptin resistance is present, it can promote insulin resistance by depressing PI3K activation [54]. Furthermore, if IRSs are phosphorylated at particular sites, like serine 307, by some kinases such as IKKβ/NF-κB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), their signaling activity in this via is reduced and insulin resistance occurs [55]. On the other hand, tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) functions as a negative regulator of the signaling cascade of insulin, by dephosphorylating tyrosine residues of IRS-1 [56] (Figure 2).
As described above, inflammation and the consequent presence of cytokines, like the tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, C-reactive protein, and interleukins, are caused by obesity and are strongly associated with insulin resistance [44,57]. For example, TNF-α interferes with insulin signaling through serine phosphorylation of IRS-1, which decreases GLUT-4 expression and, consequently, diminishes glucose entry into cells [58]. In addition, inflammation releases nitric oxide, which inhibits the PI3K–Akt pathway through S-nitrosylation of Akt [59]. Besides, as previously discussed, obesity is associated with the presence of inflammation and insulin resistance and these alterations are, in turn, associated with oxidative and nitrosylative stresses [13,60,61] (Figure 2).

4. Oxidative Stress, Insulin Resistance, Type 2 Diabetes, and Gender

4.1. Obesity and Oxidative Stress

In normal conditions, cell metabolism produces free radicals, which exert a crucial function in signaling; a disequilibrium in free radicals (augmented free radicals in addition to decreased antioxidants) induces oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species, ROS) [61]. Food with elevated calories and rich in fats cause obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes; consumption of these types of food increases the presence of p47phox, IL-6, and ROS production [62].
As previously mentioned, obesity produces inflammation, which in turn is associated with insulin resistance, leading to metabolic syndrome, finally, inducing type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is currently a pathologic condition widely distributed worldwide, and it has been suggested that its associated damage may be different in relation to age and gender of the diabetic subjects. The cultural differences, lifestyle, behavior, environment, nutrition, genetics, epigenetics, metabolic and hormonal level dissimilarity between men and women are the reasons for the diversity in predisposition and development of type 2 diabetes between them. The symptoms, risks, and complications observed in them are also different.
Oxidative stress induces insulin resistance by disturbing the insulin signaling pathway, affecting regulation at the level of adipokines [63] and favoring some of the mentioned serine–threonine kinases pathways. Expressions of factor NF-kβ [64], TNF-α, IL-1β (which participate in the β cells injury), plasma endotoxin, and Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 are increased. Furthermore, suppression of cytokine signaling 3 and IKKβ in association with TNF-α, NF-κB, and JNK affect the IRS-1 (ubiquitylation and proteolysis) by inhibiting its phosphorylation [65] (Figure 2).
Regarding glucose tolerance, altered fasting glucose levels are predominant in men and altered glucose tolerance is common in women. Usually, normal glucose tolerance is preserved if insulin secretion is capable to offset the diminution of insulin sensitivity, which is present in increased body mass index (BMI) or age [66]. When type 2 diabetes is present, the deficiency in insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion is significant and comparable in both genders; insulin sensitivity is reduced when BMI increases in an equal proportion for both men and women. Indeed, during aging, a deficiency in glucose tolerance is observed and the differences between genders decrease, although the metabolic profile is affected more in women than in men [67,68], promoted by insulin resistance and associated with the weight gain observed in type 2 diabetes [69,70].
In association with insulin resistance, in obese subjects, the presence of biomarkers of oxidative stress has been observed; the latter include malondialdehyde (indicative of lipid peroxidation and ROS), protein carbonyls, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, hydroperoxides, protein oxidation products, 3-nitrotyrosine, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), carbohydrate metabolites, and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which have the ability to diminish insulin sensitivity [13,71,72] (Figure 2). Obesity is associated with a higher production of H2O2 by mitochondria and a decrease in the reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione disulfide in skeletal muscle [73], which has a negative correlation with body mass index. A rise in the oxidative redox state produces the increase in the levels of the transcriptional factor mentioned above [74].
Many women present being overweight or obese after 45 years of age, in association with pre-menopause and menopause. These stages in the life of women are associated with hormonal changes (decrease in the concentration of estrogens, for example); the decrease in estrogens favors weight gain and type 2 diabetes in women. In men, overweight is observed at younger ages [75]; in both, obesity is the main risk factor for type 2 diabetes [76]. Moreover, disturbances in glucose tolerance are more frequent in women than in men no matter the age [76]. The risks associated with type 2 diabetes seem to be lesser in women than in men; this difference generates a greater gap regarding central adiposity, coagulation, and inflammation alterations between diabetic and non-diabetic women than in men [69]. Regarding adipokines, women display increased expression of leptin and adiponectin and their receptor in abdominal adipose tissue. Overall, meta-analyses have revealed that women present higher leptin and adiponectin levels than men, with similar age and BMI, which could be associated with their sex hormones [77]. In some longitudinal studies, augmented plasma leptin is associated with a higher diabetes risk in men [78]. Furthermore, an inverse correlation between plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in obese and diabetic subjects has been observed, which has been postulated to be higher in women [79,80,81]; besides, androgens could provoke a diminution in adiponectin secretion [78].

4.2. Type 2 Diabetes and Gender

Gender and biological sex influence several pathologies, among which are metabolic disarrays, like insulin resistance and diabetes. In general, diabetes is predominant in men in relation to women, especially in subjects between 35 and 69 years of age, who are considered to be middle-aged; the top in diabetes incidence happens earlier in men (65–69 years) than in women (70–79 years) [82]. In association, in almost all animal models, males are more likely to present obesity, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia than females due to nutritional defiance [83]. Insulin resistance is observed when peripheral tissues (adipose, skeletal muscle, and liver) do not react correctly to insulin, affecting the uptake of glucose. The organs and tissues that participate in glucose metabolism express and respond to inflammatory mediators; insulin resistance, in turn, is associated with a slight inflammation state [84]. Estrogens are involved in the regulation of metabolic processes and can affect inflammatory responses. Macrophages and monocytes associated with inflammation are activated by estrogen through their receptors. Additionally, there is a relation between the decreased levels of estrogen in post-menopausal women and an augmented inflammatory state. Post-menopausal women have augmented lymphocyte and monocyte counts and enhanced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These results suggest that estrogens influence insulin resistance [85]; in addition, insulin resistance can promote the appearance of metabolic syndrome and, eventually, of type 2 diabetes. Men are more vulnerable to metabolic syndrome than premenopausal women; the vulnerability is modified when estrogen levels are reduced during menopause, regardless of age [86].
It is currently clear that many aspects of energy balance and glucose metabolism are regulated differently in men and women and influence their predisposition to type 2 diabetes. When women are reproductively active, they have energy requirements partitioning very different from those of men, such as carbohydrate and lipid utilization as energy sources, which favor energy storage in subcutaneous adipose tissues and preserve them from visceral and ectopic fat accumulation. Insulin sensitivity is greater in women, who are characterized by higher capacities for insulin secretion and incretin responses than men; however, if glucose tolerance is present, both gender progress toward diabetes. On the other hand, there are many suggestions regarding the protective actions of endogenous estrogens, principally through the activation of the estrogen receptor α in several organs, like the brain, liver, skeletal muscle, adipose and pancreatic tissues [83]. Clinical and experimental studies show that post-pubertal sex steroid hormones essentially provide for sex differences in diabetes vulnerability. The protection offered by endogenous estrogens to women is confirmed by the loss of this protection in relation to glucose homeostasis during menopause. The decrease in estrogens in menopausal women results in an increased occurrence of metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes. Ageing prompts body changes in both sexes; menopause prompts the progressive increase of visceral fat, which contributes to the augmented possibility of metabolic disorders [87,88]. Therefore, it is very important to bear in mind the sex differences, in both human and animal models, in preclinical and clinical investigations [89].
On the other hand, among the organs involved, the liver exerts an important role in glucose homeostasis, since gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis take place in this organ. Regarding liver metabolism, augmented liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transferase) have been observed before the occurrence of type 2 diabetes in both genders. A strong relationship between type 2 diabetes and this enzyme has been observed, which can be explained by the relation among γ-glutamyl transferase, fatty liver, oxidative stress, and, hence, with insulin resistance compared with the other enzymes [89]. According to [90], the fatty liver index, liver enzymes, triglycerides, waist circumference, and BMI are better indicators of metabolic syndrome in women than in men.
In the same context, there is evidence of a putative role of erythrocytes in a differential management of nitrogen-related metabolites, which occurs in healthy women and men [91]. An increased activity and expression of arginase I seem to be associated with a diabetes-induced increase in oxidative stress, which also initiates the feed-forward cycle of diminished nitric oxide (NO) levels and oxidative stress [92]. Moreover, citrulline could promote NO production and endothelial function and enhance peripheral insulin sensitivity [93], improving organ perfusion and endothelial metabolism, which might involve an antioxidant property [94]. Indeed, it has been reported that there are differences in nitrogen metabolism in humans according to gender. Changes in vascular NO activity may contribute to changes in cardiovascular risk associated mainly with men, probably related to the α-adrenoreceptor responsiveness, among other mechanisms [95]. In addition, increased ammonia production consequent to metabolic pathologies has been found mainly among middle-aged Japanese men with chronic liver disease rather than in women suffering the same hepatic disturbances [96].
A recent study from our group evidences that in healthy subjects there are significant gender differences in NO production and in arginine metabolism [91]. For instance, the arginine/nitrites and arginine/citrulline ratios are bigger in erythrocytes of healthy men than in those of women, suggesting a lower flow of arginine through putative nitric oxide synthase in men; healthy men also seemed to use less arginine as substrate for arginase, i.e., the arginine/urea ratio [91]. These data are consistent with the previously mentioned suggestion that women appear to have a more active NO metabolism than men. It has also been observed that the onset of type 2 diabetes is capable of canceling out gender differences in managing nitrogen-related metabolites [91]. Therefore, a possible role of erythrocytes as an extrahepatic mechanism controlling serum levels of nitrogen-related metabolites can be suggested, which differs according to sex in healthy subjects, whereas the serum control is lost in diabetic subjects. All possible differences attributable to gender in the development of type 2 diabetes are shown in Table 1.

5. Inflammation and Metabolic Regulation in Type 2 Diabetes

The metabolomics approach constitutes a systematic analysis and study of metabolites in a biological sample [14], including biochemical compounds, such as organic acids, amino acids, sugars, lipids, and nucleotides [97]. It allows evaluating feasible associations between specific metabolites, such as amino acids and type 2 diabetes, with subsequent analyses of human studies on the utility of some metabolites, including glutamine, glycine, and aromatic amino acids, as reliable biomarkers [98] (Figure 3).
In addition, the microbiota’s composition can play a major role in the development of obesity and diabetes, and some treatments directed against diabetes may have actions mediated by gut bacteria (Figure 1). Several underlying mechanisms could include an association of reduced and altered microbial diversity with inflammation, insulin resistance, and adiposity [98]. In particular, changes in the diversity and enrichment of different bacterial phyla are related to the inflammation grade and the ability of harvesting energy from food, where a high-fat diet favors the growth of bacteria capable of beneficial actions on energy extraction (Figure 1). Indeed, a massive oversupply of glucose into the pentose phosphate pathway of intestinal bacteria can be assumed to result in elevated levels of erythrose 4-phosphate [98] (Figure 3). In fact, dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes [99,100], which includes total lipid or lipid class (i.e., triacylglycerols or HDL) levels. Recent studies have identified signatures of particular lipids or patterns in lipid classes to be predictive of diabetes onset. In the “Framingham Heart Study” cohort, it was conclusively identified that saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids of lower carbon number are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes [101] (Figure 3).
Fatty acids can exert inflammatory effects on macrophages, which could contribute to inflammation [102]. After entering the cell, fatty acids are thio-esterified into their acyl-CoA derivatives, catalyzed by long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases (ACSLs). These observations indicate that ACSL1-derived lipids, not glucose, play a critical role by promoting the inflammatory phenotype of macrophages associated with diabetes. Additionally, recent exciting discoveries link intestinal microbiota metabolism of dietary-derived saturated fats to cardiovascular disease risk, highlighting these parameters as attractive potential therapeutic targets for obesity/diabetes [103,104] (Figure 3).

Metabolites, Metabolomics, and the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes can be considered a nutritional disorder characterized by the inability of the body to respond to insulin, which leads to many complications, including kidney failure, retinopathy, lower-limb amputation, an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [105], and stroke [106]. Several risk factors have been associated with type 2 diabetes, including obesity, high cholesterol and blood sugar levels, family history of type 2 diabetes, and history of gestational diabetes [107,108]. In addition, the concentrations of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) have been recorded higher in patients with diabetes than in healthy subjects, results that are reproducible and statistically significant [14,97,109]. Moreover, the relationship between BCAAs and type 2 diabetes has been explored, focusing on the total concentration of all three BCAAs, i.e., leucine, isoleucine, and valine (Figure 3). Another study correlated high concentrations of BCAAs with insulin resistance, presented by the experimental subjects receiving an amino acid-enrichment diet [109]. Based on the results, the authors concluded that an increased concentration of BCAAs is a reliable predictor of future insulin resistance among patients with type 2 diabetes, proposing these associations as targets for clinical management of the disease [110,111,112,113]. For instance, a study reported higher plasma levels of branched-chain and aromatic amino acids and higher glutamate-to-glutamine ratios in patients with diabetes than in healthy individuals [109]. These findings agree with studies reporting a positive association between obese individuals and elevated BCAAs and glutamate levels (Figure 3).
Other amino acids, such as hydroxyl acids and hydroxybutyrate, seem to induce an elevated insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes, and β-hydroxybutyrate and 3-hydroxybutyrate could correlate with a higher risk of prediabetes [114,115,116,117]. With regards to changes in lipids metabolism, some studies have focused on relationships between the metabolomic lipid profiles and type 2 diabetes, using high-throughput techniques to identify various classes of lipids, such as plasma phospholipids, triglycerides, sphingolipids, and glycerophospholipids [118]. Through these methods, high concentrations of glycerophospholipids and sphingomyelins have been found in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In addition, there are reports indicating that increased levels of fatty acids, such as dodecanoic and myristic acids, occur in patients with diabetes [119]. Therefore, efforts have been made to identify these lipid profiles that may facilitate prediction and management of the disease [14,119]. In addition, organic acids like acetic acid, dimethyl ester, and maleic acid have been associated with type 2 diabetes; other organic compounds, such as purines and arginine, citrulline, and ornithine, are also altered at the onset of diabetes [91,113,120].
Therefore, the combination of glucose, leucine, and other activators stimulates the mammalian target of the rapamycin complex (mTORC) pathway, inducing the proliferation of β-cells and insulin secretion. Leucine can increase the activity of the mTOR pathway, resulting in activation of S6 kinase and leading to inhibition of IRSs through serine phosphorylation. Augmented activity of the mTOR complex could promote an inability of β-cells to release insulin through an inhibitory effect on the mentioned kinase, leading to cellular insulin resistance and contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes (Figure 2). For instance, the BMIs of subjects have been compared to the concentrations of BCAAs in their diets and their insulin resistance levels. Obese subjects had higher metabolic concentrations (signatures) of BCAAs and higher resistance to insulin than lean individuals with a lower BMI. In addition, rats fed a diet rich in BCAAs display increased rates of insulin resistance and impaired phosphorylation of enzymes within their muscles. In contrast, obese mice with pre-diabetes fed a low-BCAAs, calorie-unrestricted, high-fat, and high sugar diet experience an improvement in metabolic health [121] (Figure 3).
The pathway involving BCAAs (essential amino acids for humans) is similar and begins with pyruvic acid, its production is increased when high glucose levels are available. Furthermore, in the presence of high glucose levels, more pyruvic acid is available to enteric bacteria, and more pyruvic acid is subsequently produced. Together with pyruvic acid, high amounts of the resulting amino acids, valine, leucine, and isoleucine (BCAAs), are produced. Metabolites such as glucose, fructose, amino acids, and lipids, which are typically altered in individuals with type 2 diabetes, can be identified by metabolomic techniques and used as potential diabetes biomarkers.
Other groups have also identified BCAAs and aromatic amino acids as predictors of type 2 diabetes in both human and animal models [122,123,124]. Further work with the “Framingham cohort” identified 2-aminoadipic acid (2-AAA) as an independent biomarker for risk development and highlighted the role of 2-AAA as an insulin secretagogue [125]. The 2-AAA is an intermediary metabolite of lysine degradation and has previously been shown to be increased by diabetes and renal failure [126] and has been suggested to be a biomarker of oxidative stress [127,128].
Identification of these biomarkers provides insight into the pathogenesis of diabetes. For instance, the increase in BCAAs may impact insulin sensitivity through the mTORC, as BCAAs could activate mTORC1 and the downstream target ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) [129]. Additionally, catabolism of BCAAs can provide intermediates for the TCA cycle, potentially driving energy production [130]. The idea that the TCA cycle flux is altered in diabetes has been supported in other metabolomic studies in rats and mice [131,132]. Besides, reduced blood concentrations of glycine can also function as a predictor of type 2 diabetes [133] (Figure 3).
Other studies have been addressed at determining blood metabolite profiles before and after glucose loading [133,134], differentiating responses in obese from those of lean individuals [135]. These studies have noted differences in levels of acylcarnitines, glutamine/glutamate, additional amino acids, and other small molecules. These observations raise the possibility that alterations in plasma metabolite levels could be good predictors of the onset of diabetes and, therefore, aid in the identification of ‘at risk’ individuals by adding information over standard clinical markers. In this context, a study reported that serum indoxyl sulfate correlates inversely with renal function and might have a direct relationship with aortic calcification [136].

6. Conclusions

It is likely that the initial trigger of metabolic inflammation is the disruption of energy homeostasis produced by a positive energy balance and, therefore, the initial response tries to relieve the anabolic pressure produced by obesity. In time, this initial adaptive response fails and is transformed to a maladaptive one that can perpetuate inflammation in obese and type 2 diabetes patients. Although obesity and type 2 diabetes have a multifactorial origin, it is obvious that insulin and leptin resistance are deeply involved in these pathologies. In the brain, activated microglia produce pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to various stimuli, such as oxidative stress. The resulting neuro-inflammation and its molecular and cellular mechanisms are most likely related to obesity and type 2 diabetes. Early diagnosis and treatment of hyperglycemia should be clearly performed years before the development of type 2 diabetes (pre-diabetic patients), and oxidative stress and inflammation during prediabetes could be useful markers for clinicians to prevent its progression to type 2 diabetes. Changes in plasma metabolites, identified through metabolomic techniques, can also be useful as type 2 diabetes biomarkers. Targeted immunotherapies and anti-hyperglycemic medication are gaining a relevant role in improving the inflammatory state in patients with diabetes.
However, there is an evident lack of information about the influence of gender on the physiopathology of type 2 diabetes, as well as on its progression. Clinical parameters, such as fatty liver index, liver enzymes, triglycerides, waist circumference, and body mass index, are better indicators of metabolic syndrome in women than in men, and we have found significant differences in erythrocyte’s metabolism of nitrogen-related compounds have been identified in women and men with type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, much research is still needed to evaluate this putative influence of gender in the future therapeutics for T2DM.

Author Contributions

All authors carried out the conceptualization and validation of the issues, and were in charge of the writing of the original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the expert aid from Biols. Gerardo Coello, Ana María Escalante, Eng. Juan Manuel Barbosa, and Ivette Rosas, for designing figures and computational programs, as well as to Eng. Aurey Galván and Manuel Ortínez, for maintenance and supervision of the laboratory equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare to not have any kind of conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kacířová, M.; Zmeškalová, A.; Kořínková, L.; Železná, B.; Kuneš, J.; Maletínská, L. Inflammation: Major denominator of obesity, Type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology? Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 547–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sripetchwandee, J.; Chattipakorn, N.; Chattipakorn, S.C. Links between obesity-induced brain insulin resistance, brain mitochondrial dysfunction, and dementia. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, S. Insulin signaling, resistance, and the metabolic syndrome: Insights from mouse models into disease mechanisms. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 220, T1–T23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Czech, M.P. Insulin action and resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bai, Y.; Sun, Q. Macrophage recruitment in obese adipose tissue. Obes. Rev. 2015, 16, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Heneka, M.T.; Carson, M.J.; El Khoury, J.; Landreth, G.E.; Brosseron, F.; Feinstein, D.L.; Jacobs, A.H.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Vitorica, J.; Ransohoff, R.M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frisardi, V.; Solfrizzi, V.; Seripa, D.; Capurso, C.; Santamato, A.; Sancarlo, D.; Vendemiale, G.; Pilotto, A.; Panza, F. Metabolic-cognitive syndrome: A cross-talk between metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2010, 9, 399–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de Mello, A.H.; Prá, M.; Cardoso, L.C.; de Bona Schraiber, R.; Rezin, G.T. Incretin-based therapies for obesity treatment. Metabolism 2015, 64, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sa-Nguanmoo, P.; Tanajak, P.; Kerdphoo, S.; Jaiwongkam, T.; Wang, X.; Liang, G.; Li, X.; Jiang, C.; Pratchayasakul, W.; Chattipakorn, N.; et al. FGF21 and DPP-4 inhibitor equally prevents cognitive decline in obese rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 1663–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, F.; Woollard, J.R.; Jordan, K.L.; Lerman, A.; Lerman, L.O.; Eirin, A. Mitochondrial targeted peptides preserve mitochondrial organization and decrease reversible myocardial changes in early swine metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abdul-Ghani, M.A.; Tripathy, D.; DeFronzo, R.A. Contributions of beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guzik, T.J.; Cosentino, F. Epigenetics and immune-metabolism in Diabetes and aging. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maddux, B.A.; See, W.; Lawrence, J.C., Jr.; Goldfine, A.L.; Goldfine, I.D.; Evans, J.L. Protection against oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in rat L6 muscle cells by micromolar concentrations of alpha-lipoic acid. Diabetes 2001, 50, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Furukawa, S.; Fujita, T.; Shimabukuro, M.; Iwaki, M.; Yamada, Y.; Nakajima, Y.; Nakayama, O.; Makishima, M.; Matsuda, M.; Shimomura, I. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 114, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Hruby, A.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Hu, F.B. Metabolomics in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zheng, Y.; Ceglarek, U.; Huang, T.; Li, L.; Rood, J.; Ryan, D.H.; Bray, G.A.; Sacks, F.M.; Schwarzfuchs, D.; Thiery, J.; et al. Weight-loss diets and 2-y changes in circulating amino acids in 2 randomized intervention trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature 2006, 444, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lumeng, C.N.; Saltiel, A.R. Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2111–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lackey, D.E.; Olefsky, J.M. Regulation of metabolism by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Misiak, B.; Leszek, J.; Kiejna, A. Metabolic syndrome, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease--the emerging role of systemic low-grade inflammation and adiposity. Brain Res. Bull. 2012, 89, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Festa, A.; Hanley, A.J.; Tracy, R.P.; D’Agostino, R., Jr.; Haffner, S.M. Inflammation in the prediabetic state is related to increased insulin resistance rather than decreased insulin secretion. Circulation 2003, 108, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saltiel, A.R.; Olefsky, J.M. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Newcombe, E.A.; Camats-Perna, J.; Silva, M.L.; Valmas, N.; Huat, T.J.; Medeiros, R. Inflammation: The link between comorbidities, genetics, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akshintala, D.; Chugh, R.; Amer, F.; Cusi, K. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Overlooked Complication of Type 2 Diabetes. In Endotext [Internet]; Feingold, K.R., Anawalt, B., Boyce, A., Chrousos, G., de Herder, W.W., Dhatariya, K., Dungan, K., Grossman, A., Hershman, J.M., Hofland, J., et al., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2000; PMID: 31310460. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koyama, Y.; Brenner, D.A. Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sutti, S.; Albano, E. Adaptive immunity: An emerging player in the progression of NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, K.; Kusminski, C.M.; Scherer, P.E. Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2094–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Arkan, M.C.; Hevener, A.L.; Greten, F.R.; Maeda, S.; Li, Z.W.; Long, J.M.; Wynshaw-Boris, A.; Poli, G.; Olefsky, J.; Karin, M. IKK-beta links inflammation to obesity-induced insulin resistance. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hirosumi, J.; Tuncman, G.; Chang, L.; Görgün, C.Z.; Uysal, K.T.; Maeda, K.; Karin, M.; Hotamisligil, G.S. A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance. Nature 2002, 420, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stienstra, R.; van Diepen, J.A.; Tack, C.J.; Zaki, M.H.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Perera, D.; Neale, G.A.; Hooiveld, G.J.; Hijmans, A.; Vroegrijk, I.; et al. Inflammasome is a central player in the induction of obesity and insulin resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15324–15329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Summers, S.A. Sphingolipids and insulin resistance: The five Ws. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2010, 21, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, H.; Kokoeva, M.V.; Inouye, K.; Tzameli, I.; Yin, H.; Flier, J.S. TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 3015–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, P.; Oh, D.Y.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Lagakos, W.S.; Talukdar, S.; Osborn, O.; Johnson, A.; Chung, H.; Maris, M.; Ofrecio, J.M.; et al. LTB4 promotes insulin resistance in obese mice by acting on macrophages, hepatocytes and myocytes. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, P.; Liu, S.; Lu, M.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Oh, D.; Imamura, T.; Johnson, A.M.F.; Sears, D.; Shen, Z.; Cui, B.; et al. Hematopoietic-Derived Galectin-3 Causes Cellular and Systemic Insulin Resistance. Cell 2016, 167, 973–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dumic, J.; Dabelic, S.; Flögel, M. Galectin-3: An open-ended story. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 616–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Henderson, N.C.; Sethi, T. The regulation of inflammation by galectin-3. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 230, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, M.L.; Liu, X.P.; Wang, F.; Liu, X.X.; Liu, W.F.; Wu, D.; Tao, H.; Wang, R.L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, J.W.; et al. Conditioned medium from human umbilical vein endothelial cells promotes proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis of adipose derived stem cells. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Torres, S.; Fabersani, E.; Marquez, A.; Gauffin-Cano, P. Adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic syndrome. The proactive role of probiotics. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antuna-Puente, B.; Feve, B.; Fellahi, S.; Bastard, J.P. Adipokines: The missing link between insulin resistance and obesity. Diabetes Metab. 2008, 34, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Becerril, S.; Salvador, J.; Portincasa, P.; Colina, I.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J. Involvement of the leptin-adiponectin axis in inflammation and oxidative stress in the metabolic syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lau, W.B.; Ohashi, K.; Wang, Y.; Ogawa, H.; Murohara, T.; Ma, X.L.; Ouchi, N. Role of adipokines in cardiovascular disease. Circ. J. 2017, 81, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lumeng, C.N.; Bodzin, J.L.; Saltiel, A.R. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Weisberg, S.P.; McCann, D.; Desai, M.; Rosenbaum, M.; Leibel, R.L.; Ferrante, A.W., Jr. Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1796–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, H.; Barnes, G.T.; Yang, Q.; Tan, G.; Yang, D.; Chou, C.J.; Sole, J.; Nichols, A.; Ross, J.S.; Tartaglia, L.A.; et al. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1821–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gual, P.; Le Marchand-Brustel, Y.; Tanti, J.F. Positive and negative regulation of insulin signaling through IRS-1 phosphorylation. Biochimie 2005, 87, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amar, J.; Chabo, C.; Waget, A.; Klopp, P.; Vachoux, C.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Smirnova, N.; Bergé, M.; Sulpice, T.; Lahtinen, S.; et al. Intestinal mucosal adherence and translocation of commensal bacteria at the early onset of type 2 diabetes: Molecular mechanisms and probiotic treatment. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011, 3, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sesti, G. Pathophysiology of insulin resistance. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 20, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zick, Y. Ser/Thr phosphorylation of IRS proteins: A molecular basis for insulin resistance. Sci. STKE 2005, 25, 2005.268.pe4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kiselyov, V.V.; Versteyhe, S.; Gauguin, L.; De Meyts, P. Harmonic oscillator model of the insulin and IGF1 receptors’ allosteric binding and activation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Maletínská, L.; Popelová, A.; Železná, B.; Bencze, M.; Kuneš, J. The impact of anorexigenic peptides in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 240, R47–R72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tumminia, A.; Vinciguerra, F.; Parisi, M.; Frittitta, L. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Alzheimer’s Disease: Role of Insulin Signalling and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Copps, K.D.; White, M.F. Regulation of insulin sensitivity by serine/threonine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate proteins IRS1 and IRS2. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 2565–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jou, J.; Choi, S.S.; Diehl, A.M. Mechanisms of disease progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin. Liver Dis. 2008, 28, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Varela, L.; Horvath, T.L. Leptin and insulin pathways in POMC and AgRP neurons that modulate energy balance and glucose homeostasis. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aguirre, V.; Werner, E.D.; Giraud, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Shoelson, S.E.; White, M.F. Phosphorylation of Ser307 in insulin receptor substrate-1 blocks interactions with the insulin receptor and inhibits insulin action. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 1531–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yip, S.C.; Saha, S.; Chernoff, J. PTP1B: A double agent in metabolism and oncogenesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dandona, P.; Aljada, A.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Inflammation: The link between insulin resistance, obesity and diabetes. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Peraldi, P.; Spiegelman, B. TNF-alpha and insulin resistance: Summary and future prospects. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1998, 182, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Luca, C.; Olefsky, J.M. Inflammation and insulin resistance. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Elmarakby, A.A.; Sullivan, J.C. Relationship between oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines in diabetic nephropathy. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2012, 30, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yaribeygi, H.; Noroozadeh, A.; Mohammadi, M.T.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. Crocin improves oxidative stress by potentiating intrinsic anti-oxidant defense systems in pancreatic cells during uncontrolled hyperglycemia. J. Pharmacopunct. 2019, 22, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ghanim, H.; Abuaysheh, S.; Sia, C.L.; Korzeniewski, K.; Chaudhuri, A.; Fernandez-Real, J.M.; Dandona, P. Increase in plasma endotoxin concentrations and the expression of Toll-like receptors and suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in mononuclear cells after a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal: Implications for insulin resistance. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 2281–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Houstis, N.; Rosen, E.D.; Lander, E.S. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature 2006, 440, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aljada, A.; Mohanty, P.; Ghanim, H.; Abdo, T.; Tripathy, D.; Chaudhuri, A.; Dandona, P. Increase in intranuclear nuclear factor kappaB and decrease in inhibitor kappaB in mononuclear cells after a mixed meal: Evidence for a proinflammatory effect. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Evans, J.L.; Maddux, B.A.; Goldfine, I.D. The molecular basis for oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 1040–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Walford, G.A.; Porneala, B.C.; Dauriz, M.; Vassy, J.L.; Cheng, S.; Rhee, E.P.; Wang, T.J.; Meigs, J.B.; Gerszten, R.E.; Florez, J.C. Metabolite traits and genetic risk provide complementary information for the prediction of future type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014, 37, 2508–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mascarenhas-Melo, F.; Marado, D.; Palavra, F.; Sereno, J.; Coelho, Á.; Pinto, R.; Teixeira-Lemos, E.; Teixeira, F.; Reis, F. Diabetes abrogates sex differences and aggravates cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2013, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Steinberg, H.O.; Paradisi, G.; Cronin, J.; Crowde, K.; Hempfling, A.; Hook, G.; Baron, A.D. Type II diabetes abrogates sex differences in endothelial function in premenopausal women. Circulation 2000, 2, 2040–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wannamethee, S.G.; Papacosta, O.; Lawlor, D.A.; Whincup, P.H.; Lowe, G.D.; Ebrahim, S.; Sattar, N. Do women exhibit greater differences in established and novel risk factors between diabetes and non-diabetes than men? The British Regional Heart Study and British Women’s Heart Health Study. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Peters, S.A.; Huxley, R.R.; Sattar, N.; Woodward, M. Sex Differences in the Excess Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases Associated with Type 2 Diabetes: Potential Explanations and Clinical Implications. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2015, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Moreira, P.I.; Sayre, L.M.; Zhu, X.; Nunomura, A.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G. Detection and localization of markers of oxidative stress by in situ methods: Application in the study of Alzheimer disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 610, 419–434. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rahmanto, A.S.; Morgan, P.E.; Hawkins, C.L.; Davies, M.J. Cellular effects of peptide and protein hydroperoxides. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Anderson, E.J.; Lustig, M.E.; Boyle, K.E.; Woodlief, T.L.; Kane, D.A.; Lin, C.T.; Price, J.W., 3rd; Kang, L.; Rabinovitch, P.S.; Szeto, H.H.; et al. Wasserman DH, Neufer PD. Mitochondrial H2O2 emission and cellular redox state link excess fat intake to insulin resistance in both rodents and humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Biobaku, F.; Ghanim, H.; Batra, M.; Dandona, P. Macronutrient-Mediated Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: Relevance to Insulin Resistance, Obesity, and Atherogenesis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 6118–6128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ng, M.; Fleming, T.; Robinson, M.; Thomson, B.; Graetz, N.; Margono, C.; Mullany, E.C.; Biryukov, S.; Abbafati, C.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Garawi, F.; Devries, K.; Thorogood, N.; Uauy, R. Global differences between women and men in the prevalence of obesity: Is there an association with gender inequality? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, G.C.; Qin, L.Q.; Ye, J.K. Leptin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes: Gender-specific meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sattar, N. Gender aspects in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic risk. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 27, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Li, S.; Shin, H.J.; Ding, E.L.; van Dam, R.M. Adiponectin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009, 302, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bonneau, G.A.; Pedrozo, W.R.; Berg, G. Adiponectin and waist circumference as predictors of insulin-resistance in women. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2014, 8, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rasul, S.; Ilhan, A.; Reiter, M.H.; Baumgartner-Parzer, S.; Kautzky-Willer, A. Relations of adiponectin to levels of metabolic parameters and sexual hormones in elderly type 2 diabetic patients. Gend. Med. 2011, 8, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cho, N.H.; Shaw, J.E.; Karuranga, S.; Huang, Y.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Ohlrogge, A.W.; Malanda, B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 138, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tramunt, B.; Smati, S.; Grandgeorge, N.; Lenfant, F.; Arnal, J.F.; Montagner, A.; Gourdy, P. Sex differences in metabolic regulation and diabetes susceptibility. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Monteiro, R.; Teixeira, D.; Calhau, C. Estrogen signaling in metabolic inflammation. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 615917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. De Rooij, S.R.; Nijpels, G.; Nilsson, P.M.; Nolan, J.J.; Gabriel, R.; Bobbioni-Harsch, E.; Mingrone, G.; Dekker, J.M. Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease (RISC) Investigators. Low-grade chronic inflammation in the relationship between insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular disease (RISC) population: Associations with insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk profile. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. De Paoli, M.; Zakharia, A.; Werstuck, G.H. The role of estrogen in insulin resistance: A review of clinical and preclinical data. Am. J. Pathol. 2021, 191, 1490–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mauvais-Jarvis, F.; Clegg, D.J.; Hevener, A.L. The role of estrogens in control of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Endocr. Rev. 2013, 34, 309–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, H.; Yang, W.; Zhou, F.; Li, X.; Pan, Q.; Shen, Z.; Han, G.; Newell-Fugate, A.; Tian, Y.; Majeti, R.; et al. Estrogen improves insulin sensitivity and suppresses gluconeogenesis via the transcription factor Foxo1. Diabetes 2019, 68, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mauvais-Jarvis, F.; Arnold, A.P.; Reue, K. A guide for the design of pre-clinical studies on sex differences in metabolism. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 1216–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schneider, A.L.; Lazo, M.; Ndumele, C.E.; Pankow, J.S.; Coresh, J.; Clark, J.M.; Selvin, E. Liver enzymes, race, gender and diabetes risk: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Diabet. Med. 2013, 30, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cicero, A.F.; D’Addato, S.; Reggi, A.; Marchesini, G.; Borghi, C. Brisighella Heart Study. Gender difference in hepatic steatosis index and lipid accumulation product ability to predict incident metabolic syndrome in the historical cohort of the Brisighella Heart Study. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2013, 11, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Contreras-Zentella, M.L.; Sánchez-Sevilla, L.; Suárez-Cuenca, J.A.; Olguín-Martínez, M.; Alatriste-Contreras, M.G.; García-García, N.; Orozco, L.; Hernández-Muñoz, R. The role of oxidant stress and gender in the erythrocyte arginine metabolism and ammonia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Romero, M.J.; Platt, D.H.; Tawfik, H.E.; Labazi, M.; El-Remessy, A.B.; Bartoli, M.; Caldwell, R.B.; Caldwell, R.W. Diabetes-induced coronary vascular dysfunction involves increased arginase activity. Circ. Res. 2008, 102, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wasserman, D.H.; Kang, L.; Ayala, J.E.; Fueger, P.T.; Lee-Young, R.S. The physiological regulation of glucose flux into muscle in vivo. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 214, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Moinard, C.; Le Plenier, S.; Noirez, P.; Morio, B.; Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Kharchi, C.; Ferry, A.; Neveux, N.; Cynober, L.; Raynaud-Simon, A. Citrulline Supplementation Induces Changes in Body Composition and Limits Age-Related Metabolic Changes in Healthy Male Rats. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1429–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Majmudar, N.G.; Robson, S.C.; Ford, G.A. Effects of the menopause, gender, and estrogen replacement therapy on vascular nitric oxide activity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 1577–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yin, Y.H.; Ma, Z.J.; Guan, Y.H.; Ren, Y.D.; Zhang, Z.L. Clinical features of hepatic myelopathy in patients with chronic liver disease. Postgrad. Med. J. 2009, 85, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Roberts, L.D.; Koulman, A.; Griffin, J.L. Towards metabolic biomarkers of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes: Progress from the metabolome. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Arneth, B.; Arneth, R.; Shams, M. Metabolomics of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. D’Agostino, R.B., Jr.; Hamman, R.F.; Karter, A.J.; Mykkanen, L.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; Haffner, S.M. Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. Cardiovascular disease risk factors predict the development of type 2 diabetes: The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 2234–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Schulze, M.B.; Weikert, C.; Pischon, T.; Bergmann, M.M.; Al-Hasani, H.; Schleicher, E.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.U.; Boeing, H.; Joost, H.G. Use of multiple metabolic and genetic markers to improve the prediction of type 2 diabetes: The EPIC-Potsdam Study. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 2116–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rhee, E.P.; Cheng, S.; Larson, M.G.; Walford, G.A.; Lewis, G.D.; McCabe, E.; Yang, E.; Farrell, L.; Fox, C.S.; O’Donnell, C.J.; et al. Lipid profiling identifies a triacylglycerol signature of insulin resistance and improves diabetes prediction in humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1402–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hummasti, S.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation in obesity and diabetes. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tang, W.H.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Koeth, R.A.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Koeth, R.A.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Buffa, J.A.; Org, E.; Sheehy, B.T.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tai, E.S.; Tan, M.L.; Stevens, R.D.; Low, Y.L.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Goh, D.L.; Ilkayeva, O.R.; Wenner, B.R.; Bain, J.R.; Lee, J.J.; et al. Insulin resistance is associated with a metabolic profile of altered protein metabolism in Chinese and Asian-Indian men. Diabetologia 2010, 53, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Heckmann, J.G.; Lang, C.; Handschu, R.; Haslbeck, M.; Neundörfer, B. Diabetes und Schlaganfall [Diabetes and stroke]. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 2005, 130, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  108. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lucio, M.; Fekete, A.; Weigert, C.; Wägele, B.; Zhao, X.; Chen, J.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.U.; Schleicher, E.D.; Xu, G. Insulin sensitivity is reflected by characteristic metabolic fingerprints—A Fourier transform mass spectrometric non-targeted metabolomics approach. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Savolainen, O.; Fagerberg, B.; Vendelbo Lind, M.; Sandberg, A.S.; Ross, A.B.; Bergström, G. Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development-Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tessari, P.; Cecchet, D.; Cosma, A.; Puricelli, L.; Millioni, R.; Vedovato, M.; Tiengo, A. Insulin resistance of amino acid and protein metabolism in type 2 diabetes. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 30, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lynch, C.J.; Adams, S.H. Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sunny, N.E.; Kalavalapalli, S.; Bril, F.; Garrett, T.J.; Nautiyal, M.; Mathew, J.T.; Williams, C.M.; Cusi, K. Cross-talk between branched-chain amino acids and hepatic mitochondria is compromised in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 309, E311–E319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yoon, M.S. The emerging role of branched-chain amino acids in insulin resistance and metabolism. Nutrients 2016, 8, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sancak, Y.; Bar-Peled, L.; Zoncu, R.; Markhard, A.L.; Nada, S.; Sabatini, D.M. Ragulator-Rag complex targets mTORC1 to the lysosomal surface and is necessary for its activation by amino acids. Cell 2010, 141, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zoncu, R.; Bar-Peled, L.; Efeyan, A.; Wang, S.; Sancak, Y.; Sabatini, D.M. mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside-out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase. Science 2011, 334, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. McCormack, S.E.; Shaham, O.; McCarthy, M.A.; Deik, A.A.; Wang, T.J.; Gerszten, R.E.; Clish, C.B.; Mootha, V.K.; Grinspoon, S.K.; Fleischman, A. Circulating branched-chain amino acid concentrations are associated with obesity and future insulin resistance in children and adolescents. Pediatr. Obes. 2013, 8, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Knebel, B.; Strassburger, K.; Szendroedi, J.; Kotzka, J.; Scheer, M.; Nowotny, B.; Müssig, K.; Lehr, S.; Pacini, G.; Finner, H.; et al. German Diabetes Study Group. Specific Metabolic Profiles and Their Relationship to Insulin Resistance in Recent-Onset Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 2130–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Xu, F.; Tavintharan, S.; Sum, C.F.; Woon, K.; Lim, S.C.; Ong, C.N. Metabolic signature shift in type 2 diabetes mellitus revealed by mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E1060–E1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhang, A.H.; Qiu, S.; Xu, H.Y.; Sun, H.; Wang, X.J. Metabolomics in diabetes. Clin. Chim. Acta 2014, 429, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ramírez-Zamora, S.; Méndez-Rodríguez, M.L.; Olguín-Martínez, M.; Sánchez-Sevilla, L.; Quintana-Quintana, M.; García-García, N.; Hernández-Muñoz, R. Increased erythrocytes by-products of arginine catabolism are associated with hyperglycemia and could be involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cummings, N.E.; Williams, E.M.; Kasza, I.; Konon, E.N.; Schaid, M.D.; Schmidt, B.A.; Poudel, C.; Sherman, D.S.; Yu, D.; Arriola Apelo, S.I.; et al. Restoration of metabolic health by decreased consumption of branched-chain amino acids. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 623–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Renner, S.; Römisch-Margl, W.; Prehn, C.; Krebs, S.; Adamski, J.; Göke, B.; Blum, H.; Suhre, K.; Roscher, A.A.; Wolf, E. Changing metabolic signatures of amino acids and lipids during the prediabetic period in a pig model with impaired incretin function and reduced β-cell mass. Diabetes 2012, 61, 2166–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Floegel, A.; Stefan, N.; Yu, Z.; Mühlenbruch, K.; Drogan, D.; Joost, H.G.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.U.; Hrabě de Angelis, M.; Peters, A.; et al. Identification of serum metabolites associated with risk of type 2 diabetes using a targeted metabolomics approach. Diabetes 2013, 62, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Menni, C.; Fauman, E.; Erte, I.; Perry, J.R.; Kastenmüller, G.; Shin, S.Y.; Petersen, A.K.; Hyde, C.; Psatha, M.; Ward, K.J.; et al. Biomarkers for type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose using a non-targeted metabolomics approach. Diabetes 2013, 62, 4270–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, T.J.; Ngo, D.; Psychogios, N.; Dejam, A.; Larson, M.G.; Vasan, R.S.; Ghorbani, A.; O’Sullivan, J.; Cheng, S.; Rhee, E.P.; et al. 2-Aminoadipic acid is a biomarker for diabetes risk. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 4309–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sell, D.R.; Strauch, C.M.; Shen, W.; Monnier, V.M. Aging, diabetes, and renal failure catalyze the oxidation of lysyl residues to 2-aminoadipic acid in human skin collagen: Evidence for metal-catalyzed oxidation mediated by alpha-dicarbonyls. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1126, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yuan, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Edwards, J.L. Amine metabolomics of hyperglycemic endothelial cells using capillary LC-MS with isobaric tagging. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5242–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zeitoun-Ghandour, S.; Leszczyszyn, O.I.; Blindauer, C.A.; Geier, F.M.; Bundy, J.G.; Stürzenbaum, S.R.C. elegans metallothioneins: Response to and defence against ROS toxicity. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. O’Connell, T.M. The complex role of branched chain amino acids in diabetes and cancer. Metabolites 2013, 3, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Guan, M.; Xie, L.; Diao, C.; Wang, N.; Hu, W.; Zheng, Y.; Jin, L.; Yan, Z.; Gao, H. Systemic perturbations of key metabolites in diabetic rats during the evolution of diabetes studied by urine metabonomics. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, M.; Wang, X.; Aa, J.; Qin, W.; Zha, W.; Ge, Y.; Liu, L.; Zheng, T.; Cao, B.; Shi, J.; et al. GC/TOFMS analysis of metabolites in serum and urine reveals metabolic perturbation of TCA cycle in db/db mice involved in diabetic nephropathy. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2013, 304, F1317–F1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Fiehn, O.; Garvey, W.T.; Newman, J.W.; Lok, K.H.; Hoppel, C.L.; Adams, S.H. Plasma metabolomic profiles reflective of glucose homeostasis in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic obese African-American women. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wopereis, S.; Rubingh, C.M.; van Erk, M.J.; Verheij, E.R.; van Vliet, T.; Cnubben, N.H.; Smilde, A.K.; van der Greef, J.; van Ommen, B.; Hendriks, H.F. Metabolic profiling of the response to an oral glucose tolerance test detects subtle metabolic changes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhao, X.; Peter, A.; Fritsche, J.; Elcnerova, M.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.U.; Schleicher, E.D.; Xu, G.; Lehmann, R. Changes of the plasma metabolome during an oral glucose tolerance test: Is there more than glucose to look at? Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, E384–E393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Barreto, F.C.; Barreto, D.V.; Liabeuf, S.; Meert, N.; Glorieux, G.; Temmar, M.; Choukroun, G.; Vanholder, R.; Massy, Z.A.; European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 4, 1551–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 10 01729 g001
Figure 1. Scheme of peripheral inflammation connectivity involving obesity-Figure 1 induced insulin resistance in the adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Figure 1. Scheme of peripheral inflammation connectivity involving obesity-Figure 1 induced insulin resistance in the adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Antioxidants 10 01729 g001
Antioxidants 10 01729 g002
Figure 2. The insulin signaling pathway and the molecular mechanism of insulin resistance due to inflammation.
Figure 2. The insulin signaling pathway and the molecular mechanism of insulin resistance due to inflammation.
Antioxidants 10 01729 g002
Antioxidants 10 01729 g003
Figure 3. Major interactions among oxidative stress, inflammation, hyperglycemia, insulin-resistance, and metabolic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Figure 3. Major interactions among oxidative stress, inflammation, hyperglycemia, insulin-resistance, and metabolic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Antioxidants 10 01729 g003
Table 1. Some gender differences in metabolic regulation, parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress, as well as diabetes susceptibility.
Table 1. Some gender differences in metabolic regulation, parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress, as well as diabetes susceptibility.
ParameterFindingSex DifferenceReference
Insulin resistanceOnset of T2DMPredominant in men (35–69 years old)[82]
Insulin resistanceInflammatory stateWomen show a larger state[84]
Insulin resistanceMetabolic syndromeMen show a higher vulnerability[86]
Insulin sensitivityInsulin secretionHigher in women[83]
Liver metabolismIncreased enzyme activitiesSimilar in both sexes[89]
Metabolic syndromeIndicators of liver functionBetter indicators of metabolic alterations in women[90]
Nitrogen metabolism by erythrocytesArginine catabolism and ammoniaMore increased in diabetic men[91]
Cardiovascular riskVascular NO activityMore diminished in diabetic men[95]
Chronic liver diseasePathological ammonia productionMore frequent in middle-age men[97]
Blood arginine metabolismIncreased arginine flow in healthy menDiabetes abrogates gender differences[91]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Contreras-Zentella, M.L.; Hernández-Muñoz, R. Possible Gender Influence in the Mechanisms Underlying the Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and the Metabolic Alterations in Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111729

AMA Style

Contreras-Zentella ML, Hernández-Muñoz R. Possible Gender Influence in the Mechanisms Underlying the Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and the Metabolic Alterations in Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(11):1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Contreras-Zentella, Martha Lucinda, and Rolando Hernández-Muñoz. 2021. "Possible Gender Influence in the Mechanisms Underlying the Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and the Metabolic Alterations in Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes" Antioxidants 10, no. 11: 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111729

APA Style

Contreras-Zentella, M. L., & Hernández-Muñoz, R. (2021). Possible Gender Influence in the Mechanisms Underlying the Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and the Metabolic Alterations in Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes. Antioxidants, 10(11), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop