Next Article in Journal
The Neural Correlates of Conflict Detection and Resolution During Multiword Lexical Selection: Evidence from Bilinguals and Monolinguals
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Levels of Control Processes for Wisconsin Card Sorts: An Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Activation on a Pentylenetetrazole—Kindling Rat Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Evaluative Conditioning Change Well-Established Attitudes Towards Popular Brands? Your Brain Says Yes Even Though Your Mouth Says No
Open AccessArticle

A Laboratory Word Memory Test Analogue Differentiates Intentional Feigning from True Responding Using the P300 Event-Related Potential

1
Department of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA
2
Capstone College of Nursing, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2019, 9(5), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9050109
Received: 9 April 2019 / Revised: 7 May 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 14 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Collection on Cognitive Neuroscience)
Symptom exaggeration and feigned cognitive impairment occur commonly in forensic and medicolegal evaluations. As a result, methods to detect feigned cognitive impairment are an indispensable component of neuropsychological assessments. This study reports the results of two neurophysiological experiments using a forced-choice recognition task built from the stimuli of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test as well as a new linguistically informed stimulus set. Participant volunteers were instructed either to do their best or to feign cognitive impairment consistent with a mild traumatic brain injury while their brain activity was monitored using event-related potentials (ERP). Experiment 1 varied instructions across individuals, whereas Experiment 2 varied instructions within individuals. The target brain component was a positive deflection indicating stimulus recognition that occurs approximately 300 ms after exposure to a stimulus (i.e., the P300). Multimodal comparison (P300 amplitude to behavioral accuracy) allowed the detection of feigned cognitive impairment. Results indicate that, for correct responses, P300s were equivalent for the simulated malingering and good effort conditions. However, for incorrect responses, feigned impairment produced reliable but significantly reduced P300 amplitudes. Although the P300 is an automatic index of recognition—even when knowledge is hidden—its amplitude appears capable of modulation by feigning strategies. Implications of this finding are discussed for research and clinical applications. View Full-Text
Keywords: feigning; malingering; event-related potentials; clinical neuropsychology; P300 feigning; malingering; event-related potentials; clinical neuropsychology; P300
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shelley-Tremblay, J.F.; Eyer, J.C.; Hill, B.D. A Laboratory Word Memory Test Analogue Differentiates Intentional Feigning from True Responding Using the P300 Event-Related Potential. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 109.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop