Next Article in Journal
Perceived Discrimination and Substance Use among Caribbean Black Youth; Gender Differences
Previous Article in Journal
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome: A Historical Perspective, Its Current Use and the Influence of Comorbidities in Treatment Response
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(7), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8070130

Code-VEP vs. Eye Tracking: A Comparison Study

Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 April 2018 / Revised: 28 June 2018 / Accepted: 30 June 2018 / Published: 7 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [638 KB, uploaded 7 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

Even with state-of-the-art techniques there are individuals whose paralysis prevents them from communicating with others. Brain–Computer-Interfaces (BCI) aim to utilize brain waves to construct a voice for those whose needs remain unmet. In this paper we compare the efficacy of a BCI input signal, code-VEP via Electroencephalography, against eye gaze tracking, among the most popular modalities used. These results, on healthy individuals without paralysis, suggest that while eye tracking works well for some, it does not work well or at all for others; the latter group includes individuals with corrected vision or those who squint their eyes unintentionally while focusing on a task. It is also evident that the performance of the interface is more sensitive to head/body movements when eye tracking is used as the input modality, compared to using c-VEP. Sensitivity to head/body movement could be better in eye tracking systems which are tracking the head or mounted on the face and are designed specifically as assistive devices. The sample interface developed for this assessment has the same reaction time when driven with c-VEP or with eye tracking; approximately 0.5–1 second is needed to make a selection among the four options simultaneously presented. Factors, such as system reaction time and robustness play a crucial role in participant preferences. View Full-Text
Keywords: SSVEP; eye tracking; c-VEP; EEG; BCI SSVEP; eye tracking; c-VEP; EEG; BCI
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nezamfar, H.; Mohseni Salehi, S.S.; Higger, M.; Erdogmus, D. Code-VEP vs. Eye Tracking: A Comparison Study. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 130.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Brain Sci. EISSN 2076-3425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top