Next Article in Journal
Leuprolide Acetate Promotes Sensory Recovery and Modulates Dorsal Root Ganglion Responses After Sciatic Nerve Transection in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
ICTD: Combination of Improved CNN–Transformer and Enhanced Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis for Eye-Movement Emotion Classification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Tong et al. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378

1
Luhe Institute of Neuroscience, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China
2
Department of Neurology, Luhe Clinical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China
3
Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
4
Department of Research and Development Center, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
5
Department of General Surgery, Luhe Clinical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China
6
China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Xuanwu Clinical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(3), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030331
Submission received: 8 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026
In our article “Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway” [1], we identified an error in Figure 1A introduced during figure preparation. The TTC images for the no-treatment, chlorpromazine and promethazine (C + P), and C + P/NADPH oxidase (NOX) inhibitor groups were incorrectly presented. The corrected Figure 1 is provided below. This error does not affect the results or conclusions of the study.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 1. Infarct volume reduction by control treatment, chlorpromazine and promethazine (C+P) treatment, and C+P/NADPH oxidase (NOX) inhibitor treatment. 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) histology depicts (A) the cortex and striatum at three different levels supplied by the middle cerebral artery (MCA) from anterior +1.00 mm to posterior −4.8 mm to the bregma at 24 h of reperfusion. (B) Percentage of infarct volume reduction (mean ± standard error (SE)) with no treatment (50.0% ± 2.5%), C+P treatment (33.7% ± 6.0%), and C+P/NOX inhibitor treatment (28.5% ± 3.0%) at 24 h of reperfusion. While no significant difference in infarct volume was produced between cohorts, there was a significant reduction in both cohorts when compared to no treatment (## p < 0.01). In addition, at 48 h of reperfusion (C,D), infarct volume in ischemic rats (39.1% ± 3.1%) was significantly reduced by C+P treatment (23.1% ± 5.5%) (# p < 0.05), while DMSO alone did not induce any neuroprotection (37.1% ± 4.4%). MCA, middle cerebral artery, C+P, chlorpromazine and promethazine.
Figure 1. Infarct volume reduction by control treatment, chlorpromazine and promethazine (C+P) treatment, and C+P/NADPH oxidase (NOX) inhibitor treatment. 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) histology depicts (A) the cortex and striatum at three different levels supplied by the middle cerebral artery (MCA) from anterior +1.00 mm to posterior −4.8 mm to the bregma at 24 h of reperfusion. (B) Percentage of infarct volume reduction (mean ± standard error (SE)) with no treatment (50.0% ± 2.5%), C+P treatment (33.7% ± 6.0%), and C+P/NOX inhibitor treatment (28.5% ± 3.0%) at 24 h of reperfusion. While no significant difference in infarct volume was produced between cohorts, there was a significant reduction in both cohorts when compared to no treatment (## p < 0.01). In addition, at 48 h of reperfusion (C,D), infarct volume in ischemic rats (39.1% ± 3.1%) was significantly reduced by C+P treatment (23.1% ± 5.5%) (# p < 0.05), while DMSO alone did not induce any neuroprotection (37.1% ± 4.4%). MCA, middle cerebral artery, C+P, chlorpromazine and promethazine.
Brainsci 16 00331 g001

Reference

  1. Tong, Y.; Elkin, K.B.; Peng, C.; Shen, J.; Li, F.; Guan, L.; Ji, Y.; Wei, W.; Geng, X.; Ding, Y. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tong, Y.; Elkin, K.B.; Peng, C.; Shen, J.; Li, F.; Guan, L.; Ji, Y.; Wei, W.; Geng, X.; Ding, Y. Correction: Tong et al. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378. Brain Sci. 2026, 16, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030331

AMA Style

Tong Y, Elkin KB, Peng C, Shen J, Li F, Guan L, Ji Y, Wei W, Geng X, Ding Y. Correction: Tong et al. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378. Brain Sciences. 2026; 16(3):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tong, Yanna, Kenneth B. Elkin, Changya Peng, Jiamei Shen, Fengwu Li, Longfei Guan, Yu Ji, Wenjing Wei, Xiaokun Geng, and Yuchuan Ding. 2026. "Correction: Tong et al. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378" Brain Sciences 16, no. 3: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030331

APA Style

Tong, Y., Elkin, K. B., Peng, C., Shen, J., Li, F., Guan, L., Ji, Y., Wei, W., Geng, X., & Ding, Y. (2026). Correction: Tong et al. Reduced Apoptotic Injury by Phenothiazine in Ischemic Stroke Through the NOX-Akt/PKC Pathway. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 378. Brain Sciences, 16(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop