Next Article in Journal
The Rapid Sense of Direction (R-SOD) Scale: A Brief Self-Report Tool to Identify Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD)
Previous Article in Journal
Movement Impairments May Not Preclude Visuomotor Adaptation After Stroke
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neurodevelopmental Tics with Co-Morbid Functional Tic-like Behaviors: Diagnostic Challenges of a Complex Tourette Syndrome Phenotype
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 15
Issue 6
10.3390/brainsci15060620
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simple and Complex Phonic Tics in Tourette Syndrome

by
José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo
1,2,* and
Joseph Jankovic
1
1
Parkinson’s Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
Department of Sciences and Engineering, University of Guanajuato, León 36000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(6), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060620
Submission received: 22 April 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 8 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research on Tourette Syndrome: Advances and Challenges)
Versions Notes

Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) is the most common cause of tics. Tics are classified as motor and phonic tics. The latter (previously also referred to as “vocal tics”) are manifested by simple sounds (simple phonic tics) or complex, often semantically meaningful utterances (complex phonic tics). Methods: We compared the clinical and demographic features of consecutive patients with TS who exhibited simple and complex phonic tics. Results: There were 149 patients, 117 (78.5%) of whom were males; the mean age at evaluation was 19.61 ± 12.97 years. In total, 35 (23.5%) of these manifested complex phonic tics, and 26 (17.4%) had verbalizations. No statistically significant differences were observed between TS patients with simple versus complex phonic tics with respect to sex, age at onset, age at presentation, or comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or obsessive–compulsive disorder. Patients with complex phonic tics more frequently had trunk tics (p = 0.002), complex motor tics (p < 0.001), copropraxia (p = 0.002), a wider variety of phonic tics (p < 0.001) and greater tic severity (p = 0.001). The multivariate regression analysis showed an independent association between trunk tics and complex phonic tics. Conclusions: Complex phonic tics seem to be part of a more widely distributed, severe, and complex presentation of TS, likely representing a continuum within the spectrum of motor and phonic tics.

1. Introduction

Tics are rapid, abrupt, repetitive movements (motor tics) or sounds (phonic tics) that may vary in frequency, intensity, and complexity within and among individuals [1]. Tics are classified as “simple motor tics” when muscle contractions lead to a visible jerk-like movement (“clonic tic”), more sustained movement (“dystonic tic”), sudden cessation of movement (“blocking tic”), or muscle contraction without visible movement (“isometric tic”) and are classified as “complex motor tics” when manifested by a sequence of several movements or repetitive, coordinated movements (“stereotypic tics”) or obscene gestures (“copropraxia”) [1,2]. Most patients with motor tics also have phonic tics such as single meaningless sounds or noises (e.g., sniffing, throat clearing, grunting), so called “simple phonic tics”, or semantically meaningful utterances (e.g., echolalia, palilalia, or shouting of obscenities, called coprolalia) [1,2]. The loudness of complex phonic tics may vary from mere whispers to loud shrieks, as noted in some patients referred to as “screamers”. Phonic tics are often described in the literature as “vocal tics”, but we prefer the term “phonic tics” because not all sounds involve vocal cords, such as sniffing, teeth clicking, sucking sounds using the tongue, or sounds produced by the lips (e.g., whistling, blowing, simulating flatulence, etc.) [1,2].
Most of these tics were recognized in a seminal monograph published in 1885 by Georges Albert Édouard Brutus Gilles de la Tourette, a French neurologist, who described nine patients with motor tics, six with phonic tics, five with coprolalia, and five with echolalia [3]. However, there are earlier accounts of the disorder that now bears Tourette’s name, Tourette syndrome (TS). The case of a priest who appeared to have motor and phonic tics and was thought to be possessed by the devil and engage in “witchcraft” was reported by Jakob Sprenger and Heinrich Kraemer in the book Malleus Maleficarum, published in 1498 [3]. In 1825, the French physician Jean-Gaspard Itard (1775–1838) described the case of the “Marquise de Dampierre”, who was actually “Countess Picot de Dampierre”, who exhibited sudden verbal outbursts consistent with coprolalia in salons frequented by the 19th-century Parisian aristocracy [4]. She was one of the nine patients described in the original publication by Tourette. Moreover, the Parisian physician Armand Trousseau described several cases of motor and phonic tics 12 years before Tourette’s seminal description [5,6]. These historical accounts highlight the importance of “phonic” tics in the repertoire of tics manifested by patients with TS.
Involuntary vocalizations, characteristic of tics in patients with TS, have also been described in patients with a variety of other neurological disorders, including Parkinsonian disorders, Huntington’s disease, and many other conditions. [7]. According to the DSM-5 [8], phonic tics must be present in order to make a TS diagnosis. This criterion, however, is quite arbitrary, as most phonic tics are actually motor tics in which muscle contractions of nasal, oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, chest, and other articulatory structures result in sounds. This artificial diagnostic criterion was addressed in a recent “reappraisal” which mandated the presence of “motor and/or phonic tics” [9]. Unfortunately, the revised criteria, which are otherwise quite similar to the DSM-5 criteria, insisted that in order to make a TS diagnosis, the tics must “cause some degree or impairment at any point in time”. This does not take into account the fact that many patients with TS are not bothered by their tics, perhaps finding them embarrassing or even troublesome but not necessarily “impairing”. A list of phonic tics is provided in Table 1.
Despite the many clinical descriptions reported in the medical literature [1,2,3,7], it is unclear whether simple and complex phonic tics represent a fundamentally different phenomenology or are part of a continuum of motor and phonic tics. We aimed to assess these clinical features and evaluate patients with simple versus complex phonic tics.

2. Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective study of the medical charts and video recordings of 149 consecutive patients meeting the diagnostic criteria of TS according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) [8], who presented for evaluation at the Movement Disorders Clinic of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. We excluded patients with secondary tic disorders, provisional tic disorder, and chronic (persistent) motor or phonic tics according to the DSM-5. All patients were videotaped according to a standardized protocol reported elsewhere [10]. Briefly, the recording included an interview regarding the tics previously and currently affecting the patient, followed by a neurological examination focusing on capturing any abnormal movements or emitted sounds. During the course of the recording, the videographer stepped out of the video studio while the camera was running in order to capture tics that would otherwise be suppressed by the patient in the presence of the examiner. The video recordings typically lasted between 15 and 20 min.
We assessed demographic variables (sex, age at onset, and age at evaluation), tic type, and body distribution of tics. All enrolled patients had a history of at least one phonic tic (as required for the diagnosis of TS), but not all of them exhibited phonic tics during the video recordings. The complexity of phonic tics was classified according to Table 1.
Videos were initially analyzed by a group of 6 neurologists specializing in movement disorders, and clinical data was registered for each patient. Additionally, video recordings were analyzed for tic severity based on the Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale by the first author of this study, a neurologist specializing in movement disorders with more than 15 years of clinical experience in the assessment of movement disorders. The scores on the Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale range from 0 to 6 [11], categorizing the presence of tics as follows: 0: none; 1: very mild (tics uncommonly seen on video); 2: mild (tics are common and noticeable but not disruptive); 3: medium (tics are common and mildly disruptive); 4: marked (tics are common and moderately disruptive); 5: severe (tics are very common and moderately disruptive); and 6: very severe (tics are very common and extremely disruptive). We divided patients into two groups, one with simple phonic tics only and one comprising patients with at least one complex phonic tic; this group may or may not have had comorbid simple phonic tics. For this study, we assessed whether patients had “verbalizations” as part of their complex phonic tics. We defined “verbalization” as patients uttering a full meaningful word, phrase, or sentence.
Neuropsychiatric comorbidities including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) were also documented in each patient according to the DSM-5 criteria [8]. This study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients or a family member provided signed written informed consent, approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board for Human Research for videotaping and publishing in a scientific journal according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Internal Review Board of Santé Medical Tower approved the protocol on 21 May 2025 with the reference number 25053C.

Statistics

Statistical evaluations were performed using SPSS version 22. We summarized data in percentages, means, and standard deviations. The chi-square test with Yates’s continuity correction or Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare ordinal data between groups. The t-test for independent samples was used to compare means between groups. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis using a backward stepwise Wald method. Significant variables in the bivariate analysis were selected as independent variable with the presence of “complex phonic” tics as the dependent variable. Odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (C.I.) were calculated using the (exp)B coefficients. Goodness of fit was estimated with the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and the coefficient of determination (R2) of the regression was calculated with the Nagelkerke test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

There were 149 patients with TS, 117 males and 32 females with a mean (±S.D.) age of 19.61 ± 12.97 years at evaluation and mean (±S.D.) age of 8.58 ± 8.57 years at onset. Among these patients, 35 (23.5%) were identified as having complex phonic tics, and 26 (17.4%) were identified as having verbalizations. Some patients with complex phonic tics also exhibited echolalia (n = 7, 20%), palilalia (n = 2, 5.7%), and coprolalia (n = 17, 48.6%). No differences were identified in sex distribution, age at onset, and at evaluation between patients with simple and complex phonic tics (Table 2).
The distribution of tics did not differ between patients with simple and complex phonic tics, except for arm (p = 0.026) and trunk tics that were significantly more frequently observed in patients with complex phonic tics (p ≤ 0.001). Moreover, complex motor tics and copropraxia were significantly more frequent in those with complex phonic tics (p ≤ 0.001). The number of phonic tics and the severity of tics was greater in patients with complex phonic tics. However, comorbid ADHD and OCD were not more common in patients exhibiting complex phonic tics. The differences in demographic and clinical features were essentially unchanged when contrasting patients with simple phonic tics with all patients with complex phonic tics or the subgroup with verbalizations (Table 2). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a greater number of phonic tics was associated with complex phonic tics and verbalizations, and the presence of trunk tics was independently associated with verbalizations (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In this study, we compared the demographic and clinical features of TS patients with simple phonic tics versus those also showing complex phonic tics; the latter were also subdivided into those with and without verbalizations. We found that patients with complex phonic tics more frequently had trunk tics, complex motor tics, copropraxia, greater tic severity, and a more extensive repertoire of phonic tics. These differences essentially remained unchanged when only considering patients with verbalizations, while no differences were observed in sex distribution, age at onset or evaluation, or comorbid ADHD and OCD.
The significant association of complex phonic tics with the presence of trunk tics (p = 0.013) is intriguing (Table 3). We hypothesize that the muscle activation used to produce complex phonic tics overlaps with respiratory and thoracic muscles involved in this tic distribution. Trunk tics may cause also breathing interference and can be confused with pulmonary disorders [12].
Patients with complex phonic tics more frequently have complex motor tics, including copropraxia, suggesting that those patients tend to have greater tic complexity overall, not only for audible sounds but also for motor behaviors. Additionally, tic severity was greater in those with complex phonic tics with a higher diversity of phonic tics. This latter finding was independently associated with complex phonic tics after controlling for other variables showing statistical significance in the bivariate analysis. This evidence suggests that patients with complex phonic tics have greater severity, variability, and complexity of the underlying tic disorder than those with simple phonic tics. However, the lack of differences in variables such as sex, age, comorbid ADHD, or OCD between patients with simple and complex phonic tics suggests that these tics more likely represent a continuum in phenomenology severity and complexity between these groups. This is in accordance with previous studies where no major differences were noted in patients with TS + ADHD vs. TS only [13]. In the case of OCD, an initial multivariate study reported that patients with TS + OCD were more commonly male, had an early age at onset, and had greater aggressive obsessions, cleaning compulsions, and trichotillomania [14]; however, these findings were not confirmed in a later study [15]. Further studies should help to clarify whether different tic phenomenology can be observed in patients with comorbid OCD and ADHD.
It is unclear why the phonatory apparatus is particularly involved in patients with TS. It has been proposed that phonic tics and motor tics involving the cranial and axial muscles may be related to the social behavior network (SBN), a group of structures which interconnects the basal ganglia, the amygdala, periaqueductal gray matter, and other relevant limbic structures [16]. The SBN helps to mediate sex-specific and socially pertinent phonations and facial expressions in certain animal species and humans [16]. This may explain why patients with complex phonic tics exhibit a larger number of phonic tics and greater complexity of motor tics, including more frequent coprophenomena (i.e., copropraxia and coprolalia) as observed in our study.
One experimental study in monkeys showed bilateral limbic cortical–subcortical activation with disinhibition of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and with abnormal, but inconsistent, spikes in local field potentials (LFPs) detected in this structure and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), along with phase–phase alpha oscillation coupling between the NAc, the ACC, and the primary motor cortex, preceding sound emissions [17]. Moreover, premovement potentials were recorded in the cingulate and prefrontal cortices in monkeys who exhibited uttering with intense motivational rewards [18]. These areas are readily involved in emotional and motivational processing [19].
These findings highlight the role of limbic structures, coupled with motor networks in the generation and persistence of phonic tics. This seems to contrast with clonic motor tics, where participation of limbic structures is modest, but there is more robust activation of the ipsilateral sensorimotor system observed in PET scans [20]. The experimental disinhibition model in monkeys, using injections of bicuculline in the sensorimotor putamen, showed the appearance of periodic tics in the orofacial muscles [20]. This occurs with a 64% increased activity of neurons in the cerebellar cortex and a variety of responses in the neurons of the dentate nuclei [20]. This finding highlights the emerging role of the cerebellum in the pathogenesis of tics, where, along with the primary motor cortex, it seems to have a function as a gate for tic release [21]. The question of how the cerebellum may influence the occurrence of phonic tics is unclear; however, right cerebellar hemispherectomy in monkeys eliminated premovement potentials in the motor cortex and in the posterior bank of an area homolog of human Broca’s area in the left hemisphere in monkeys, changing motor and vocal expressions [18].
Coprolalia, one of the most over-emphasized features of TS, is a classic example of a complex phonic tic, highlighted in Tourette’s seminal 1885 paper [3]. Coprolalia may sometimes be difficult to assess, as it may present as slurred or partially pronounced words or disguised in neologisms or euphemisms [22]. It may also be denied by patients or family members due to its stigmatizing character. Moreover, some patients may also think of the obscene word without uttering it (mental coprolalia). In a series of 558 consecutive new cases of TS from 15 sites and seven countries, coprolalia occurred at some point in 19.3% of males and 14.6% of females at a mean age at onset of 11 years; in 11%, coprolalia was the initial symptom of TS [23]. Coprolalia is usually in a form of uttering (swearing) obscenities (foul, repulsive language often with sexual or scatological meaning), rather than profanities (cursing with religious meaning), although some have racist, sexist, or vulgar (coarse or crude) meaning. Coprolalia as part of coprophenomena has been related to higher tic severity scores and poor global and family functioning in individuals suffering from it [24]. A coprophenomenon, often coupled with impulsive behavior, rage outbursts, intrusive behavior (e.g., forced touching), alcohol, and substance abuse may trigger or eventually lead to TS patients becoming involved with law enforcement and the legal system [25,26,27].
Coprophenomena, which rarely occurs in other conditions, such as neuroacanthocytosis [28], is not well understood but may be an example of prominent disinhibition in neural pathways linking the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic circuits and the limbic structures. However, the underlying pathophysiology is difficult to assess, as there are no animal models of coprolalia and pathophysiology studies should rely on human studies. Coprolalia has been reported to improve with the D2-receptor partial agonist aripiprazole and botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections in the vocal cords [29,30].
Tics observed in the context of TS should be differentiated from functional tics. There is significant overlap between both types of tics, as both can show some degree of distractibility and suggestibility, with bouts of tics. Moreover, patients with functional tics present a more restricted body distribution, with a less complex and less severe syndrome compared to those with TS [31]. However, patients with functional tics usually deny having a premonitory feeling, have an older age at onset, and are unable to transitorily suppress their tics. However, these features have not been readily evaluated for phonic tics.
Our study has limitations, as it was conducted in a tertiary care center for TS. It is possible that enrolling patients in a referral center for movement disorders might have introduced a selection bias of patients towards those with greater TS severity. However, the recruited patients had diverse degrees of tic severity, making the cohort representative of patients with TS. Another limitation is the lack of longitudinal data, making it not possible to determine the time at onset of complex phonic tics during the evolution of the condition. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, we were not able to determine the frequency or nature of premonitory urges commonly preceding motor as well as phonic tics [32]. We did not determine the presence of other comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders including ODD, depression, and anxiety in order to determine if they were fundamentally different between patients with simple and complex phonic tics. Another limitation is that we did not assess the effect of therapy in our cohort of patients. It has been observed that pharmacological therapies aiming to decrease motor tics have beneficial effects on phonic tics; moreover, the use of (BoNT) in the laryngeal muscles has shown to be useful in decreasing all types of phonic tics, including coprolalia or complex vocalizations [33].

5. Conclusions

In summary, patients with complex phonic tics were more frequently associated with trunk tics and a greater number of phonic tics. The latter suggests that these patients had more extensively distributed tics with greater severity, variability, and complexity than patients exhibiting only simple phonic tics. However, simple and complex phonic tics, including verbalizations, seem to be part of a continuum of tic severity and complexity.

Author Contributions

J.F.B.-C. gathered the data, performed statistical analysis, conceptualized and wrote the first draft, and reviewed the manuscript; J.J. gathered the data and conceptualized and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Baylor College of Medicine Internal Review Board provided consent for case publications after written approval by patients or family members.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kurlan, R. Tourette’s syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2332–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jankovic, J.; Kurlan, R. Tourette syndrome: Evolving concepts. Mov. Disord. 2011, 26, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McNaught, K.S.; Mink, J.W. Advances in understanding and treatment of Tourette syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Walusinski, O.; Féray, J.C. The Marquise de Dampierre identified at last, the first described clinical case of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 176, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rickards, H.; Woolf, I.; Cavanna, A.E. ‘‘Trousseau’s disease’’: A description of the Gilles de la Tourette syndrome 12 years before 1885. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 2285–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Walusinski, O. Armand Trousseau (1801–1867), a neurologist before neurology. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 176, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mainka, T.; Balint, B.; Gövert, F.; Kurvits, L.; van Riesen, C.; Kühn, A.A.; Tijssen, M.A.J.; Lees, A.J.; Müller-Vahl, K.; Bhatia, K.P.; et al. The spectrum of involuntary vocalizations in humans: A video atlas. Mov. Disord. 2019, 34, 1774–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; Text Revisions (DSM-5-TR); American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarchioto, M.; Frey, J.; Ganos, C.; Gilbert, D.L.; Hartmann, A.; Hedderly, T.; Isaacs, D.; Malaty, I.; Martindale, J.M.; Medina Escobar, A.; et al. Tic Disorders Study Group of the International Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders Society. Diagnostic Criteria for Primary Tic Disorders: Time for Reappraisal. Mov. Disord. 2024, 39, 1276–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baizabal-Carvallo, J.F.; Alonso-Juarez, M.; Jankovic, J. Oromandibular tics associated with Tourette syndrome. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 2591–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goetz, C.G.; Pappert, E.J.; Louis, E.D.; Raman, R.; Leurgans, S. Advantages of a modified scoring method for the Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale. Mov. Disord. 1999, 14, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaczyńska, J.; Janik, P. Tonic Tics in Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome. Neuropediatrics 2021, 52, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rothenberger, A.; Heinrich, H. Co-Occurrence of Tic Disorders and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Does It Reflect a Common Neurobiological Background? Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jaisoorya, T.S.; Reddy, Y.C.; Srinath, S.; Thennarasu, K. Obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without tic disorder: A comparative study from India. CNS Spectr. 2008, 13, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Conelea, C.A.; Walther, M.R.; Freeman, J.B.; Garcia, A.M.; Sapyta, J.; Khanna, M.; Franklin, M. Tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): Phenomenology and treatment outcome in the Pediatric OCD Treatment Study II. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2014, 53, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Albin, R.L. Tourette Syndrome as a Disorder of the Social Decision Making Network. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McCairn, K.W.; Nagai, Y.; Hori, Y.; Ninomiya, T.; Kikuchi, E.; Lee, J.Y.; Suhara, T.; Iriki, A.; Minamimoto, T.; Takada, M.; et al. A Primary Role for Nucleus Accumbens and Related Limbic Network in Vocal Tics. Neuron 2016, 89, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gemba, H.; Miki, N.; Sasaki, K. Cortical field potentials preceding vocalization and influences of cerebellar hemispherectomy upon them in monkeys. Brain Res. 1995, 697, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leisman, G.; Sheldon, D. Tics and Emotions. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McCairn, K.W.; Iriki, A.; Isoda, M. Global dysrhythmia of cerebro-basal ganglia-cerebellar networks underlies motor tics following striatal disinhibition. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caligiore, D.; Mannella, F.; Arbib, M.A.; Baldassarre, G. Dysfunctions of the basal ganglia-cerebellar-thalamo-cortical system produce motor tics in Tourette syndrome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singer, C. Tourette syndrome. Coprolalia and other coprophenomena. Neurol. Clin. 1997, 15, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Freeman, R.D.; Zinner, S.H.; Müller-Vahl, K.R.; Fast, D.K.; Burd, L.J.; Kano, Y.; Rothenberger, A.; Roessner, V.; Kerbeshian, J.; Stern, J.S.; et al. Coprophenomena in Tourette syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2009, 51, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Myers, S.P.; Meeks, K.D.; Adams, H.; Vierhile, A.E.; Augustine, E.; Collins, A.; Lewin, A.B.; Murphy, T.K.; Mink, J.W.; Vermilion, J. Coprophenomena Associated with Worse Individual and Family Function for Youth with Tourette Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 2025, 15, e200369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Porta, M.; Servello, D.; Dell’Osso, B.; Dina, C.Z.; Bona, A.; Alleva, G.C. Critical aspects in the legal defence of patients with Tourette’s Syndrome: An Italian case series. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2018, 61, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mataix-Cols, D.; Virtanen, S.; Sidorchuk, A.; Fernández de la Cruz, L.; Larsson, H.; Lichtenstein, P.; Latvala, A. Association of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder with Violent Assault and Criminal Convictions. JAMA Neurol. 2022, 79, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Martino, D.; Leckman, J.F.; Okun, M.S. Why Some Individuals with Tourette Syndrome Experience Assault and Perpetrate Criminal Behavior. JAMA Neurol. 2022, 79, 442–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Spitz, M.C.; Jankovic, J.; Killian, J.M. Familial tic disorder, parkinsonism, motor neuron disease, and acanthocytosis: A new syndrome. Neurology 1985, 35, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ben Djebara, M.; Worbe, Y.; Schüpbach, M.; Hartmann, A. Aripiprazole: A treatment for severe coprolalia in “refractory” Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Mov. Disord. 2008, 23, 438–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scott, B.L.; Jankovic, J.; Donovan, D.T. Botulinum toxin injection into vocal cord in the treatment of malignant coprolalia associated with Tourette’s syndrome. Mov. Disord. 1996, 11, 431–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baizabal-Carvallo, J.F.; Alonso-Juarez, M.; Jankovic, J. Contrasting features between Tourette syndrome and secondary tic disorders. J. Neural. Transm. 2023, 130, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cavanna, A.E.; Black, K.J.; Hallett, M.; Voon, V. Neurobiology of the Premonitory Urge in Tourette’s Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Treatment Implications. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 29, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vincent, D.A., Jr. Botulinum toxin in the management of laryngeal tics. J. Voice 2008, 22, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Examples of simple and complex phonic tics.
Table 1. Examples of simple and complex phonic tics.
SimpleComplex
Belching
Clicking
Coughing
Gasping
Grunting
Gurgling
Guttural sounds
Hiccupping
Hissing
Honking
Moaning
Noisy breathing
Puffing
Screaming
Sniffing
Snorting
Squeaking
Squealing
Sucking
Throat clearing
‘tsk’, ‘pft’, etc.
Yelping		Saying:
Syllables
Partial words
Partial echolalia
Partial palilalia
Partial coprolalia
Full words *
Full sentences *
Echolalia *
Palilalia *
Coprolalia *
* These are considered “verbalizations” in the present study.
Table 2. Contrasting features between patients with simple vs. complex phonic tics.
Table 2. Contrasting features between patients with simple vs. complex phonic tics.
Simple Phonic tics, n = 114Complex Phonic Tics, n = 35Verbalizations †, n = 26p-Value
(Simple vs. Complex Phonic Tics)		p-Value (Simple vs. Verbalizations)
Sex (Male)88 (77.2%)29 (82.9%)21 (80.8%)0.6320.893
Age at onset (years) (SD)8.34 ± 8.459.25 ± 9.0510.20 ± 10.090.6200.372
Age at examination (years) (SD)20.18 ± 13.6517.74 ± 10.3817.92 ± 11.140.2640.377
Head/facial tics99 (86.4%)32 (91.4%)23 (88.5%)0.6661.000
Head jerks69 (60.5%)25 (71.4%)19 (73.1%)0.3330.332
Arm tics41 (36%)20 (57.1%)15 (57.7%)0.0260.069
Shoulder tics50 (43.9%)18 (51.4%)15 (57.7%)0.3510.214
Trunk tics *32 (28.1%)20 (57.1%)18 (69.2%)0.002<0.001
Leg tics30 (26.3%)13 (37.1%)12 (46.2%)0.2160.079
Complex motor tics *49 (42%)29 (82.9%)21 (80.7%)<0.0010.001
Copropraxia *3 (2.6%)7 (20%)5 (19.2%)0.0020.006
Dystonic tics26 (22.8%)9 (26.7%)9 (34.6%)0.8990.210
ADHD46 (40.4%)20 (57.1%)13 (50%)0.1200.497
OCD61 (53.5%)23 (65.7%)17 (65.4%)0.2440.310
Number of phonic tics * (mean, SD)2.19 ± 1.474.63 ± 0.974.65 ± 0.85<0.001<0.001
Tic severity score * (mean, SD)3.25 ± 1.053.94 ± 1.113.92 ± 1.130.0010.004
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; OCD: obsessive–compulsive disorder. * Statistically significant. † Verbalization was considered when patients uttered a full meaningful word, phrase, or sentence.
Table 3. Multivariate regression analysis showing independent variables associated with complex phonic tics and verbalizations.
Table 3. Multivariate regression analysis showing independent variables associated with complex phonic tics and verbalizations.
B CoefficientWaldOR (ExpB)95% C.I. ExpBp-Value
Complex phonic tics (M1)
Copropraxia0.8340.8082.3030.373–14.1980.369
Tic severity0.2751.2511.3170.813–2.1320.263
Arm tics−0.7011.2600.4960.146–1.6870.262
Complex tics0.7981.7252.2200.675–7.2990.189
Number of phonic tics *1.13429.923.1072.070–4.664<0.001
Trunk tics0.9113.132.4880.906–6.8340.077
Verbalizations (M2)
Tic severity0.0150.0031.0150.603–1.7080.955
Complex tics0.2960.1811.3450.344–5.2620.670
Copropraxia0.9700.8482.6380.335–20.8070.357
Number of phonic tics *1.16622.223.2091.976–5.210<0.001
Trunk tics *1.4496.164.2591.356–13.3750.013
Model 1 (M1): Hosmer–Lemeshow: p = 0.942, Nagelkerke: R2 = 0.537. Model 2 (M2): Hosmer–Lemeshow: p = 0.842, Nagelkerke: R2 = 0.552. * Statistically significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baizabal-Carvallo, J.F.; Jankovic, J. Simple and Complex Phonic Tics in Tourette Syndrome. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060620

AMA Style

Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Simple and Complex Phonic Tics in Tourette Syndrome. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(6):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baizabal-Carvallo, José Fidel, and Joseph Jankovic. 2025. "Simple and Complex Phonic Tics in Tourette Syndrome" Brain Sciences 15, no. 6: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060620

APA Style

Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F., & Jankovic, J. (2025). Simple and Complex Phonic Tics in Tourette Syndrome. Brain Sciences, 15(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop