Next Article in Journal
Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Gene-Modified and Induced Animal Models, Complex Cell Culture Models, and Computational Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Life History Questionnaires in Defining Individualised Goals of Care for Clinical Cognitive Motor Dissociation Patients: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness

Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(5), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050487 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 April 2025 / Revised: 16 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 6 May 2025
Disorders of consciousness (DOCs) are a dynamic and challenging field, presenting significant difficulties for clinicians and neurorehabilitation specialists due to the lack of reliable assessment methods and effective intervention strategies. Meanwhile, the mechanisms underlying consciousness recovery remain unclear, and the high heterogeneity in patient outcomes further exacerbates the long-term burden on patients’ families and the healthcare system. In recent years, the integration of neuroimaging techniques, EEG decoding, and artificial intelligence has opened new avenues for overcoming the limitations of traditional behavioral assessments [1,2,3], elucidating the dynamic characteristics of consciousness-related neural circuits, and developing individualized neuromodulation strategies [4,5].
The main aims of this Special Issue, titled “Opportunities and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of consciousness”, were to collect clinical articles about the assessment, treatment, and prognosis of patients with DOC. As a result, nine research articles were published in this Special Issue.
Currently, bedside behavioral assessment is a common method for diagnosing the level of consciousness in DOC patients. However, evidence indicates that the misdiagnosis rate of behavioral assessments can be as high as 40% [6]. To improve assessment accuracy and reduce biases caused by patient and environmental factors, Keech and colleagues developed and validated a pre-assessment checklist designed for use prior to neurobehavioral evaluations (contribution 1). Their study found that this checklist effectively enhances interdisciplinary clinicians’ preparation for optimizing patient and environmental conditions, thereby improving the effectiveness of neurobehavioral assessments.
With the advancement of neuroimaging technologies, scientists are continually exploring more precise methods for assessing consciousness, aiming to capture subtle signs of consciousness in patients [7,8,9]. An accurate early diagnosis of patients with disorders of consciousness is crucial for formulating subsequent treatment strategies [10]. The current issue includes two articles related to neuroimaging assessments of consciousness levels. The study by Herrera-Diaz introduces multivariable pattern analysis (MVPA) to examine the periodic fluctuations of mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a components (contribution 2). This method allows for the accurate decoding of brain responses in comatose patients through a single EEG assessment. It reveals that the MMN response in comatose patients exhibits periodic changes over time, providing valuable insights for the management and clinical decision-making regarding comatose patients. In another EEG study, Wang proposed a novel multi-task pre-trained Transformer model (MutaPT) for classifying the EEG signals of different consciousness states (contribution 3). The study found that MutaPT significantly enhanced classification performance through multi-task learning and dataset diversification, overcoming the challenges posed by limited datasets and demonstrating its potential for practical applications.
The aforementioned studies primarily focus on the assessment of consciousness in adult patients with DOC. To investigate whether existing adult assessment tools are applicable to children, particularly younger children, Colombo validated the Italian Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P) in typically developing children (contribution 4). They found that the scale may not be suitable for younger children and proposed recommendations for modifying the scale.
In terms of treatment, Qin et al. explored the impact of propofol anesthesia on brain activity in patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) during spinal cord stimulation implantation (contribution 5). The study showed that low-dose propofol anesthesia induction could induce significant changes in the EEG of VS/UWS patients, providing a reference for optimizing anesthesia management in such patients. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has already been proven effective in treating disorders of consciousness, with scientists exploring various effective stimulation sites, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, primary motor cortex, and parietal cortex [11,12,13,14,15]. Wan’s study compared the neuroregulatory effects of frontal and parietal tDCS on DOC patients (contribution 6). The results showed no significant differences in the neurobehavioral improvement between the two, while EEG data suggested potential differences in their neuroregulatory mechanisms.
A key issue in the neurorehabilitation process for patients with acute brain injury is how to establish personalized care goals. Rodriguez Mateos investigated the impact of the life history questionnaire on the formulation of personalized care goals for patients with clinical cognitive motor dissociation in an acute neurorehabilitation unit (contribution 7). The study found that the life history questionnaire played a significant role in developing personalized care goals within the “Activities and Participation” category of the ICF framework.
Ischemic–hypoxic brain injury following cardiac arrest is one of the major causes of coma in patients. Accurately predicting neurological recovery is critical for guiding clinical treatment. Shivji conducted a retrospective study to analyze the EEG characteristics of patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac arrest (contribution 8). The study found that high-malignancy EEG, seizures, and myoclonus were associated with poor patient prognosis, while patients with benign EEG patterns exhibited better outcomes. This suggests that dynamic changes in EEG signals could provide important insights into clinical decision-making.
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most common and fatal complications of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, and an early prediction of DCI risk is of significant importance. Deininger investigated the relationship between glucose index and the occurrence of DCI (contribution 9). This study found that patients’ glucose levels significantly increased prior to the onset of DCI and further escalated after its occurrence, suggesting that glucose management may play a crucial role in the prevention and treatment of DCI.
This Special Issue compiles several important research findings on the diagnosis and treatment of DOC, highlighting significant advancements in the field regarding assessment tools, therapeutic approaches, and prognostic predictions. From behavioral assessments to the application of neuroimaging technologies, from the exploration of novel neuromodulation techniques to the development of personalized care goals, these studies offer new insights and methodologies for improving the diagnosis, treatment, and care of DOC patients.
Future research directions should continue to focus on the following areas: First, as neuroimaging technology continues to advance, efforts should be made to develop multimodal assessment systems that integrate EEG, neuroimaging, and behavioral data to create a dynamic consciousness monitoring system. Second, building on existing neuromodulation techniques, the further exploration of non-invasive, personalized neuromodulation methods is needed, along with the integration of real-time neural feedback to tailor stimulation parameters. Additionally, multi-parameter joint prediction models could be developed to improve the accuracy of neurofunctional prognosis prediction and promote the implementation of preventive treatment strategies. Finally, there should be a stronger emphasis on cross-disciplinary collaboration between neuroscience, engineering, and clinical medicine to establish a full-cycle care system based on the ICF framework. In conclusion, with the ongoing deepening of multidisciplinary collaboration and technological innovations, future research will open new avenues in the fields of consciousness decoding, neurorepair, and precision medicine, driving the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of consciousness toward more precise, personalized, and diversified approaches.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Keech, K.; Schnakers, C.; Murtaugh, B.; O’Brien, K.; Slomine, B.; Briand, M.M.; Formisano, R.; Thibaut, A.; Estraneo, A.; Noé, E.; et al. Optimizing Neurobehavioral Assessment for Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Proposal of a Comprehensive Pre-Assessment Checklist for Clinicians. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010071.
  • Herrera-Diaz, A.; Boshra, R.; Kolesar, R.; Pajankar, N.; Tavakoli, P.; Lin, C.Y.; Fox-Robichaud, A.; Connolly, J.F. Decoding Analyses Show Dynamic Waxing and Waning of Event-Related Potentials in Coma Patients. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020189.
  • Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Gao, J.; Bai, Y.; Wan, Z. MutaPT: A Multi-Task Pre-Trained Transformer for Classifying State of Disorders of Consciousness Using EEG Signal. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 688. doi:10.3390/brainsci14070688.
  • Colombo, K.; Corti, C.; Porro, C.; Fedeli, C.; Beschi, M.; Reverberi, C.; Strazzer, S. Italian Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P): Preliminary Validation in a Sample of Young Children with Typical Development. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 118 https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020118.
  • Qin, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, B.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Y.; Yao, L.; Liang, Z.; He, J.; Li, X. EEG Changes during Propofol Anes thesia Induction in Vegetative State Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Surgery. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111608.
  • Wan, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Song, W. A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295.
  • Rodriguez Mateos, Y.; Diserens, K.; Becquet, J.; Rochat, E.; Jox, R.J.; Meyer, I.A. The Role of Life History Questionnaires in Defining Individualised Goals of Care for Clinical Cognitive Motor Dissociation Patients: A Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030267.
  • Shivji, Z.; Bendahan, N.; McInnis, C.; Woodford, T.; Einspenner, M.; Calder, L.; Boissé Lomax, L.; Shukla, G.; Winston, G.P. Electroencephalography (EEG) for Neurological Prognostication in Post-Anoxic Coma Following Cardiac Arrest and Its Relationship to Outcome. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121264.
  • Deininger, M.M.; Weiss, M.; Wied, S.; Schlycht, A.; Haehn, N.; Marx, G.; Hoellig, A.; Schubert, G.A.; Breuer, T. Value of Glycemic Indices for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14090849.

References

  1. Tzovara, A.; Rossetti, A.O.; Spierer, L.; Grivel, J.; Murray, M.M.; Oddo, M.; De Lucia, M. Progression of auditory discrimination based on neural decoding predicts awakening from coma. Brain 2013, 136, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kondziella, D.; Friberg, C.K.; Frokjaer, V.G.; Fabricius, M.; Møller, K. Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2016, 87, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brandmeyer, A.; Sadakata, M.; Spyrou, L.; McQueen, J.M.; Desain, P. Decoding of single-trial auditory mismatch responses for online perceptual monitoring and neurofeedback. Front. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Egawa, S.; Ader, J.; Claassen, J. Recovery of consciousness after acute brain injury: A narrative review. J. Intensive Care 2024, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yu, B.; Wang, J.; Lu, X. Effectiveness on level of consciousness of non-invasive neuromodulation therapy in patients with disorders of consciousness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1129254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schnakers, C.; Vanhaudenhuyse, A.; Giacino, J.; Ventura, M.; Boly, M.; Majerus, S.; Moonen, G.; Laureys, S. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naro, A.; Bramanti, A.; Leo, A.; Bramanti, P.; Calabrò, R.S. Metaplasticity: A Promising Tool to Disentangle Chronic Disorders of Consciousness Differential Diagnosis. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2018, 28, 1750059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kazazian, K.; Monti, M.M.; Owen, A.M. Functional neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness: Towards clinical implementation. Brain 2025, awaf075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sala, A.; Gosseries, O.; Laureys, S.; Annen, J. Advances in neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2025, 207, 97–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Torrisi, M.; Piccolo, A.; De Luca, R.; Berenati, M.; Olivo, A.; Maresca, G.; Naro, A.; Calabrò, R.S. Are You There? The Growing Need to Get the Right Diagnosis in Disorder of Consciousness. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2018, 50, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Barra, A.; Rosenfelder, M.; Mortaheb, S.; Carrière, M.; Martens, G.; Bodien, Y.G.; Morales-Quezada, L.; Bender, A.; Laureys, S.; Thibaut, A.; et al. Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Straudi, S.; Bonsangue, V.; Mele, S.; Craighero, L.; Montis, A.; Fregni, F.; Lavezzi, S.; Basaglia, N. Bilateral M1 anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in post traumatic chronic minimally conscious state: A pilot EEG-tDCS study. Brain Inj. 2019, 33, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guo, Y.; Bai, Y.; Xia, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Dai, Y.; Dang, Y.; He, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, H. Effects of Long-Lasting High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot Study. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Shi, L.; Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y. Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 560586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cavinato, M.; Genna, C.; Formaggio, E.; Gregorio, C.; Storti, S.F.; Manganotti, P.; Casanova, E.; Piperno, R.; Piccione, F. Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tDCS to prefrontal cortex in patients with disorders of consciousness. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2019, 130, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, Y. Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050487

AMA Style

Bai Y. Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(5):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Yang. 2025. "Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness" Brain Sciences 15, no. 5: 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050487

APA Style

Bai, Y. (2025). Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sciences, 15(5), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop