Next Article in Journal
Future Challenges for the Diagnosis and Management of Affective Disorders: From Preclinical Evidence to Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Opportunities and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/brainsci15050488
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

by
Kristina Catalano
1,
Lukas Andereggen
1,2,
Gerrit A. Schubert
1,3,
Serge Marbacher
1,2 and
Basil E. Grüter
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
3
Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
4
Institute of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
5
Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroradiology, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(5), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050488
Submission received: 30 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 27 April 2025 / Published: 6 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: The natural course of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains unclear. Many of them remain stable over time and few experience patterns of growth. The spontaneous regression of IAs without any microsurgical or endovascular treatment is a very rare phenomenon. This paper reports the case of a 56-year-old female who experienced spontaneous regression of her IA. Furthermore, it contains a systematic literature review to explore reported cases of spontaneous IA regression. Methods: The case of a 56-year old female patient who presented with an anterior communicating artery (ACom) IA that thrombosed spontaneously after 108 months follow-up is reported. Additionally, a systematic literature search was conducted using the Medline database to identify reported cases. Results: The IA showed spontaneous regression without any surgical or endovascular intervention. We identified 33 articles describing IAs with spontaneous regression. Reported reasons for spontaneous IA thrombosis included (1) anatomical factors like narrow aneurysmal necks; (2) coagulation pathway modifications, including antifibrinolytic activity that promotes thrombosis; and (3) hemodynamic changes such as altered blood flow dynamics and external vascular compression. These findings suggest that spontaneous regression, while rare and unpredictable, can be associated with distinct physiological and anatomical conditions. Conclusions: The spontaneous regression of IAs is an extremely rare phenomenon. It cannot reliably be predicted and may be associated with changes in the hemodynamic situation, specific anatomical constellations, or coagulation pathways.

1. Introduction

The spontaneous regression of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is an extremely rare phenomenon that challenges traditional paradigms in cerebrovascular management. While most IAs remain stable or grow gradually, some cases exhibit spontaneous thrombosis without intervention [1], raising questions about the factors driving such outcomes.
Despite advances in imaging technologies that have improved detection rates, the natural history of IAs remains incompletely understood. The unpredictability of IA behavior complicates management decisions, particularly for smaller or incidentally detected IAs, where the risks of intervention must be weighed against the likelihood of rupture with caution [2].
The socio-economic burden associated with IA management is substantial. Costs arise from initial diagnostic workups, including advanced imaging, and extend through long-term follow-up, intervention, and rehabilitation for patients suffering from rupture-related complications [3]. Studies suggest that follow-up imaging and monitoring, particularly for unruptured IAs managed conservatively, constitute a significant portion of this burden [4]. Moreover, the emergence of conservative management strategies necessitates guidelines for determining follow-up intervals, monitoring criteria, and indications for therapeutic intervention. The lack of standardized protocols complicates healthcare planning and cost control while raising concerns about patient safety and outcomes [5,6,7]. These factors underscore the importance of understanding the natural history of IAs and the implications of both conservative and interventional management approaches [8,9].
This study presents a unique case of a 56-year-old female with spontaneous regression of an anterior communicating artery (ACom) aneurysm over a nine-year follow-up. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted to identify similar cases and potential contributing factors and explanatory mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice. IA regression is influenced by various factors, including hemodynamic stress and changes in intra-aneurysmal blood flow dynamics, which can alter endothelial function and promote thrombosis within the IA sac [10,11]. Further proposed mechanisms include external compression from surrounding tissues and alterations in coagulation pathways leading to thrombosis [12]. However, the rarity of regression and its largely unpredictable nature challenge our ability to develop reliable predictive models, necessitating detailed studies and longitudinal monitoring [8,9].

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by our institutional review board and the local ethics commission (EKNZ Nr. 2020-02249).

2.1. Definition of Spontaneous Regression

For the purpose of this review, we define “spontaneous regression” as a reduction in the size or complete thrombosis of an IA confirmed by at least two imaging modalities or serial imaging over a minimum of six months, occurring without any surgical or endovascular intervention. This definition excludes regression following flow-diversion, clipping, coiling, or inflammation-related pseudoaneurysm resolution.
Inclusion criteria for literature review included documented imaging at baseline and follow-up, absence of interventional treatment, and evidence of aneurysm size reduction or thrombosis. Exclusion criteria were post-treatment changes (e.g., residual necks), mycotic or traumatic aneurysms, and cases without clear imaging-based documentation.

2.2. Case Report

We present a detailed case report of a 56-year-old female with spontaneous IA thrombosis following a diagnosis of right-sided temporal intracranial bleeding. All clinical data were extracted from her medical records, including medical imaging. We obtained a written consent regarding the use of patient data for research purposes. The case report was structured in compliance with the CARE Guidelines to ensure transparency and the reproducibility of the presented findings [13].

2.3. Literature Review

The systematic literature review was conducted in strict accordance with the PRISMA guidelines [14], focusing on the spontaneous thrombosis of IAs. A detailed search strategy was employed using the terms “intracranial aneurysm”, “spontaneous thrombosis”, “regression” and “occlusion”. The databases PubMed and Medline were searched for peer-reviewed articles published from 1951 to 2024. Articles that met the below listed inclusion criteria were included when they reported spontaneous IA thrombosis in humans, either following intervention (e.g., clipping) or without prior treatment in “native” IAs. All papers reporting the regression of a human IA with at least an abstract written in English or German language were included. Cross-referenced articles in the included papers were also included. Experimental studies on non-human IAs, papers on non-intracranial aneurysms, and non-original research such as conference papers, opinions, and letters were excluded. A list of keywords and synonyms for each concept was compiled and these keywords were combined using Boolean operators (AND, OR). The following search strategy was used on 18 January 2025: (“intracranial aneurysm”) AND (“thrombosis” OR “occlusion” OR “regression”) AND “spontaneous”. Additionally, filters for species (human), and publication date (from 1951 to 2024) were applied. Two authors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts of 586 articles and 20 additional records identified through cross-referencing from other articles, with 33 meeting the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Articles were categorized based on their focus, including spontaneous regression, unpredictability of IA regression, pathophysiological mechanisms, and hemodynamic changes responsible for spontaneous IA thrombosis (Table 1). Any discrepancy in study selection was discussed and decided upon consensus between the two authors (KC and BEG).

2.4. Case Report

Case Description

A 56-year-old female patient presented with an ischemic cerebrovascular event complicated by hemorrhagic transformation in the posterior MCA territory in the right hemisphere (Figure 2). During the diagnostic workup, an incidental anterior communicating artery (ACom) aneurysm was detected on a CT angiography (CTA). To complete the diagnostic evaluation, a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed, which confirmed the presence of the ACom IA, measuring 3 × 4 mm (Figure 3). The IA was not related to the hemorrhage in any way. Given its asymptomatic nature and regular morphology, interdisciplinary discussion revealed a conservative management strategy, including regular FU (follow-up) examinations by means of non-invasive imaging.
At the time of the initial presentation, the patient had no known pre-existing conditions, no history of hypertension, and did not take any regular medication. Laboratory findings, including platelet count (245 G/L), hemoglobin (136 G/L), and hematocrit (0.385 L/L), were within normal ranges throughout the clinical course. Coagulation parameters were also normal (Quick 92%, INR 1). During the initial hospitalization, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) grade III was diagnosed. Given the ischemic lesions in the posterior circulation, a paradoxical embolism was suspected. The patient was started on antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a statin. Additionally, she was prescribed levetiracetam after presenting with tingling paresthesias in her left arm.
A conservative management approach was proposed based on the patient’s preference and the presumed non-aneurysmal origin of the hemorrhage. Differential diagnoses included cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and her history of ischemic events. Follow-up imaging was recommended and the patient agreed with the proposed conservative strategy for the IA after detailed discussion. Unfortunately, she was lost to further FU.
Nine years after the initial ischemic event, the patient presented again with a sudden onset of severe headache, described as the worst headache of her life, accompanied by vomiting and fever. Upon arrival at the Emergency Department, the patient presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14 (A3 V5 M6). Neurological examination revealed no focal deficits but a positive meningism. A CT scan revealed an atypical right temporal intracranial hemorrhage with ventricular extension and minimal subarachnoid blood. These features raised suspicion of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) or pial venous thrombosis. CTA ruled out sinus venous thrombosis, and the ACom aneurysm appeared unchanged in morphology, with no de novo IAs or additional vascular malformations detected. Subsequent imaging with MRA and DSA showed that the ACom aneurysm had regressed in size from the previous 3 × 4 mm to 2 × 2.5 mm (Figure 3) in the absence of an intra-aneurysmal thrombus. Importantly, the IA was again not identified as the source of the hemorrhage. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for close neurological monitoring and, after 10 days, she was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Interdisciplinary discussion concluded that the ACom aneurysm was unrelated to the intracranial hemorrhage, and the exact cause of the bleeding remained unclear, with a primary suspicion of CAA. Six months after the latest event, a follow-up DSA demonstrated a stable ACom aneurysm, unchanged in size and morphology (approximately 2 × 2.5 mm). One month later, a cranial MRA revealed the resorption of the subacute to chronic right temporal lobar hemorrhage, along with post-hemorrhagic encephalomalacia. Again, since no vascular abnormalities were detected, these findings supported the hypothesis of CAA as a possible underlying etiology for the hemorrhage.

2.5. Outcome and Follow-Up

The most recent follow-up, three years after the second bleeding event, with MRI/MRA confirmed the long-term stability of the ACom aneurysm, which remained unchanged in size and morphology, with no new IAs identified. Throughout this period, the patient remained neurologically stable, undergoing physiotherapy and occupational therapy to support recovery. She showed no focal deficits and required no surgical or endovascular intervention for the IA.

3. Results

3.1. Quantitative Summary of Included Cases

To improve pattern recognition across the literature, a summary of patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and regression intervals was generated (Table 2). Among the 33 included cases, patient age ranged from 13 to 75 years (mean of 47.2 ± 16.1), aneurysm sizes ranged from 2 mm to 25 mm (mean of 6.1 ± 4.9 mm), and follow-up durations ranged from 3 months to 13 years (median of 24 months). Most aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation, particularly at the anterior communicating (ACom) and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). Regression mechanisms were inconsistently described and were variably attributed to spontaneous thrombosis, flow-related changes, or anatomical predisposition.

3.2. Literature Review

The literature overwhelmingly consists of retrospective studies and case reports, and none of the reviewed articles identified a predictive biomarker or specific early sign that could reliably indicate spontaneous IA regression. A systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 606 articles were identified using database searches, and 20 additional records were included via cross-referencing. After screening and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 studies were included in the final review (see Figure 1 for PRISMA flowchart). To synthesize the data, studies were categorized into four primary themes, as also reflected in Table 1: (1) Description of rare cases with spontaneous IA regression—reports that document individual cases of IA thrombosis without intervention, including early historical descriptions. (2) Rarity, unpredictability, and uncontrollability of IA regression—literature emphasizing the unpredictability of this phenomenon and the necessity of careful follow-up. (3) Pathophysiological mechanisms of IA regression—studies proposing biological explanations, such as vasospasm or coagulation cascade alterations. (4) Hemodynamic changes as a reason for IA regression—articles linking regression to altered flow dynamics due to aging, vascular events, or surgical intervention. These categories helped to analyze the phenomenon from different perspectives, ranging from purely observational case reports to theoretical explorations of underlying mechanisms. Detailed characteristics of the included studies and their assignment to the respective categories are summarized in Table 1. Discussion and interpretation of the findings are presented in the subsequent section.

4. Discussion

This study reports an exceptional case of spontaneous regression of an ACom aneurysm over a nine-year period without surgical or endovascular intervention. Such regressions, though rare, underscore the dynamic and unpredictable behavior of IAs. Our systematic review identified 33 published cases (see Table 1), grouped into four categories: (1) rare spontaneous regressions, (2) unpredictability, (3) physiological mechanisms, and (4) hemodynamic factors.
The lack of prospective data significantly limits our ability to draw definitive conclusions or identify predictive markers for IA regression. Much of the early literature—dating from 1944 to the early 1980s—describes spontaneous thrombosis as a rare and largely unpredictable occurrence. Dandy [15] was among the first to report such cases, noting their exceptional nature and emphasizing the need for surgical treatment due to unpredictability. Epstein [16] and Lindgren [17] also reported MCA aneurysms that regressed without intervention, though only after extended follow-up. These and other early cases (e.g., Hemmer and Umbach [18], Spallone et al. [24]) laid the foundation for our understanding. More recent studies, such as those by Ueta [26] and Hassan [27], estimate that spontaneous IA thrombosis occurs in only 1–3% of cases.

4.1. Spontaneous Regression as a Rare and Unpredictable Phenomenon

Many reports have documented regression in small, narrow-necked IAs that may be predisposed to spontaneous thrombosis. Dandy [15] and Epstein [16] described some of the earliest known cases, while Lindgren [17] noted a spontaneously regressing MCA aneurysm over a period of three years. These reports are supported by Björkesten and Troupp [19], Schunk [20], and others who documented similar findings. Such regression often occurred without preceding intervention, though its underlying causes remained speculative. In our own clinical experience, only one comparable case was seen in over two decades. As summarized in Table 1 (category 1), these cases collectively affirm the rarity of regression and the absence of consistent predictors.

4.2. Rarity, Unpredictability, and Uncontrollability of IA Regression

Although rare, IA regression is not always permanent. Several authors describe cases where regression was followed by reappearance or recanalization. Scott and Ballantine [28] observed a giant MCA aneurysm that thrombosed and later reappeared on imaging. Spetzler et al. [8] also reported a case in which an IA vanished from angiograms, only to recur. Davila et al. [29] emphasized that favorable neurological status and imaging-confirmed regression were not sufficient for prediction. Tan [30] and Choi [31] each published cases of initially regressed aneurysms that later enlarged or reopened, highlighting the phenomenon’s uncontrollability. Kalin-Hajdu et al. [32] and Jun et al. [33] reinforced this uncertainty in both native and post-clipping aneurysms. Our patient’s ACom aneurysm regressed without evident hemodynamic or anatomical predispositions, further underscoring the phenomenon’s elusiveness (Table 1, category 2).

4.3. Pathophysiological Mechanisms Leading to IA Regression

Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain spontaneous IA thrombosis. Vasospasm and neck morphology are recurrent themes: Moritake et al. [35] linked vasospasm-induced flow restriction to thrombosis, particularly in narrow-necked aneurysms. Fodstad et al. [34] and Warschewske et al. [36] examined antifibrinolytic influences, including medication-induced changes in clotting dynamics. Our patient’s ACom aneurysm exhibited narrow-neck morphology and a history of hemorrhage, both of which could have promoted local clot formation. Ueta et al. [26] described thrombosis in a non-branching supraclinoid ICA aneurysm, and Hassan [27] reported a clipped ACA aneurysm remnant that spontaneously thrombosed. These studies, as well as Jun et al. [33], suggest that spontaneous thrombosis may also occur in surgically altered IAs. All examples point toward complex biological and structural factors contributing to regression (Table 1, category 3). While case reports provide foundational observations, an understanding of spontaneous regression requires the integration of basic science. Animal models, such as elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits or rats, demonstrate that intra-aneurysmal thrombosis may be triggered by low wall shear stress (WSS), altered oscillatory shear index (OSI), and inflammatory cytokine activity [47,48]. These biomechanical environments promote endothelial dysfunction, neointimal thickening, and mural thrombosis. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies further support that saccular aneurysms with narrow necks and flow stasis are prone to thrombogenesis. Future studies of regression phenomena should incorporate vessel wall imaging, CFD modeling, and histopathological correlation where possible.

4.4. Hemodynamic Changes as a Driver of Spontaneous Regression

Hemodynamic alterations are also implicated in spontaneous regression. Yeh et al. [39] and Cantore et al. [40] showed regression following EC-IC bypass or ICA occlusion, where flow redistribution likely reduced intra-aneurysmal perfusion. Tsimpas et al. [45] reported regression in a downstream MCA aneurysm after the treatment of a proximal IA with a flow diverter. These cases suggest that treating one aneurysm can impact others via hemodynamic shifts. Our patient underwent no vascular intervention, but gradual changes due to aging, vessel remodeling, or subtle shifts in cerebral perfusion may have played a similar role. Modern imaging techniques such as high-resolution MRI and DSA, as noted by Kim et al. [46] and others, enable a better assessment of such changes. The cases in Table 1, category 4, emphasize the need to consider systemic and flow-related factors when evaluating IA regression.
In summary, spontaneous IA regression remains a rare and unpredictable event. While individual cases may be associated with distinct anatomic, physiologic, or hemodynamic conditions, consistent predictive factors are lacking. Detailed documentation and long-term follow-up, supported by the literature as shown in Table 1, remain essential for understanding and managing this phenomenon.

5. Limitations

A limitation of this study is the reliance on retrospective data and case reports, which carry a risk of selection bias and inconsistent reporting standards. The relatively small number of cases reviewed (n = 33) represents the rarity of the condition but limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the lack of long-term follow-up in many of the included studies makes it difficult to determine the durability and clinical significance of spontaneous regression. Future research addressing these gaps is essential for improving our understanding of this rare phenomenon. Prospective studies with standardized imaging protocols might help validate proposed mechanisms or identify predictive markers for IA regression.

6. Conclusions

The spontaneous regression of IAs, although rare and poorly understood, offers a unique insight into cerebrovascular dynamics and remodeling with significant implications for clinical management. This review proposes a standardized definition of regression and integrates both descriptive and mechanistic data. Hemodynamic factors, coagulation pathways, and vascular wall integrity appear central to the process, yet identifying high-risk patients remains challenging. Understanding these factors could improve diagnostic workflows, reduce unnecessary follow-ups, and lead to targeted therapeutic approaches, including non-invasive treatments. Ultimately, these insights may refine patient care, improve outcomes, and enhance decision-making for those at risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Advanced imaging technologies and ongoing research are essential to uncover the mechanisms behind regression and to develop effective monitoring and intervention strategies. Future research could employ longitudinal vessel wall MRI with black-blood sequences, CFD modeling to assess flow-related thrombotic risks, genetic profiling of extracellular matrix remodeling genes, and circulating biomarkers. Clinical monitoring protocols for regressed aneurysms should include MRA or CTA at 3 months post-regression and ongoing regular imaging thereafter.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and B.E.G.; methodology, K.C. and B.E.G.; software, K.C.; validation, K.C., L.A. and S.M.; formal analysis, K.C.; investigation, K.C. and B.E.G.; resources, K.C. and B.E.G.; data curation, K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C. and B.E.G.; writing—review and editing, L.A., G.A.S. and S.M.; visualization, K.C. and B.E.G.; supervision, B.E.G.; project administration, B.E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by Kantonsspital Aarau, Department of Neurosurgery.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ethics Committee Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ, protocol code 2020-02249, date of approval: 18 December 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the medical staff at Kantonsspital Aarau for their support in patient care and data acquisition. Special thanks to the NeuroResearch Office for administrative assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AComanterior communicating artery
CT/Acomputed tomography angiography
CFDcomputational fluid dynamics
DSAdigital subtraction angiography
EC-ICextracranial–intracranial
FUfollow-up
IAintracranial aneurysm
ICAinternal carotid artery
iDSAintraoperative digital subtraction angiography
MCAmiddle cerebral artery
MRI/MRAmagnetic resonance imaging / angiography
PComposterior communicating artery
SAHsubarachnoid hemorrhage

References

  1. Bairstow, P.; Dodgson, A.; Linto, J.; Khangure, M. Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas. Radiol. 2002, 46, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Raabe, A.; Fischer, U.; Rothwell, P.M.; Luengo-Fernandez, R.; Bervini, D.; Goldberg, J.; Trelle, S.; Gralla, J.; Beck, J.; Zubak, I. Decision-Making for Preventive Interventions in Asymptomatic Patients. Stroke 2024, 55, 1951–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bekelis, K.; Missios, S.; MacKenzie, T.A.; Labropoulos, N.; Roberts, D.W. A predictive model of hospitalization cost after cerebral aneurysm clipping. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2016, 8, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bandhauer, B.; Gruber, P.; Andereggen, L.; Berberat, J.; Wanderer, S.; Cattaneo, M.; Schubert, G.A.; Remonda, L.; Marbacher, S.; Gruter, B.E. From conservative to interventional management in unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 2024, 142, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rinaldo, L.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Cloft, H.J.; Knudsen, J.M.; Lanzino, G.; Rangel Castilla, L.; Brinjikji, W. Racial and economic disparities in the access to treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms are persistent problems. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2019, 11, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hackett, A.M.; Adereti, C.O.; Walker, A.P.; Nico, E.; Scherschinski, L.; Rhodenhiser, E.G.; Eberle, A.T.; Naik, A.; Giraldo, J.P.; Hartke, J.N.; et al. Racial and Socioeconomic Status among a Patient Population Presenting with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage versus Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: A Single-Center Study. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kandregula, S.; Savardekar, A.; Beyl, R.; Caskey, J.; Terrell, D.; Adeeb, N.; Whipple, S.G.; Newman, W.C.; Toms, J.; Kosty, J.; et al. Health inequities and socioeconomic factors predicting the access to treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the USA in the last 20 years: Interaction effect of race, gender, and insurance. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2023, 15, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Spetzler, R.F.; Winestock, D.; Newton, H.T.; Boldrey, E.B. Disappearance and reappearance of cerebral aneurysm in serial arteriograms. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1974, 41, 508–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amagasaki, K.; Higa, T.; Takeuchi, N.; Kakizawa, T.; Shimizu, T. Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to regrowth of aneurysm after neck clipping surgery. Neurol. Med. Chir. 2002, 42, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gruter, B.E.; Marbacher, S. The importance of wall degeneration in preclinical aneurysm models. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2021, 13, 200–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gruter, B.E.; Wanderer, S.; Strange, F.; Boillat, G.; Taschler, D.; Rey, J.; Croci, D.M.; Grandgirard, D.; Leib, S.L.; von Gunten, M.; et al. Patterns of Neointima Formation After Coil or Stent Treatment in a Rat Saccular Sidewall Aneurysm Model. Stroke 2021, 52, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gruter, B.E.; Wanderer, S.; Strange, F.; Sivanrupan, S.; von Gunten, M.; Widmer, H.R.; Coluccia, D.; Andereggen, L.; Fandino, J.; Marbacher, S. Comparison of Aneurysm Patency and Mural Inflammation in an Arterial Rabbit Sidewall and Bifurcation Aneurysm Model under Consideration of Different Wall Conditions. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rison, R.A.; Kidd, M.R.; Koch, C.A. The CARE (CAse REport) guidelines and the standardization of case reports. J. Med. Case Rep. 2013, 7, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dandy, W.E. Intracranial Arterial Aneurysms; Hafner: Saint-Galmier, France, 1944. [Google Scholar]
  16. Epstein, B.S. The roentgenographic aspects of thrombosis of aneurysms of the anterior communicating and anterior cerebral arteries. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 1953, 70, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindgren, S.O. Course and prognosis in spontaneous occlusions of cerebral arteries. Acta Psychiatr. Neurol. Scand. 1958, 33, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hemmer, R.; Umbach, W. The clinical course of intracranial saccular aneurysms. Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. Z. Gesamte Neurol. Psychiatr. 1960, 200, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. af Bjorkesten, G.; Troupp, H. Changes in the size of intracranial arterial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 1962, 19, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schunk, H. Spontaneous Thrombosis of Intracranial Aneurysms. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 1964, 91, 1327–1338. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lodin, H. Spontaneous thrombosis of cerebral aneurysms. Br. J. Radiol. 1966, 39, 701–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Edner, G.; Forster, D.M.; Steiner, L.; Bergvall, U. Spontaneous healing of intracranial aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1978, 48, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Scott, R.M.; Garrido, E. Spontaneous thrombosis of an intracranial aneurysm during treatment with epsilon aminocaproic acid. Surg. Neurol. 1977, 7, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Spallone, A.; Peresedov, V.V.; Kandel, E.I. Spontaneous cure of ruptured intracranial arterial aneurysms. Surg. Neurol. 1981, 16, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Benedetti, A.; Curri, C.; Colombo, F. Rebleeding of an angiographically healed aneurysm. Surg. Neurol. 1983, 20, 206–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ueta, T.; Ichi, S.; Ochi, T.; Suzuki, I. Spontaneous regression of an aneurysm at a nonbranching site of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 2004, 101, 1070–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hassan, F.; Taschner, C.A.; Thines, L.; Lejeune, J.P.; Pruvo, J.P.; Leclerc, X. Spontaneous thrombosis of a recurrent clipped intracranial aneurysm. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 36, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scott, R.M.; Ballantine, H.T., Jr. Spontaneous thrombosis in a giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1972, 37, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Davila, S.; Oliver, B.; Molet, J.; Bartumeus, F. Spontaneous thrombosis of an intracranial aneurysm. Surg. Neurol. 1984, 22, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tan, C.B.; Rodesh, G.; Lasjaunias, P. Growth and spontaneous regression of a middle cerebral artery aneurysm after surgical clipping. Interv. Neuroradiol. 2001, 7, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, Y.S.; Kim, D.W.; Jang, S.J.; Kang, S.D. Recanalization of completely thrombosed non-giant saccular aneurysm mimicking as de novo aneurysm. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2010, 48, 354–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalin-Hajdu, E.; Guilbert, F. Transformation of a cranial fusiform aneurysm into a pseudotumoral-like mass prior to spontaneous occlusion and regression. Interv. Neuroradiol. 2011, 17, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jun, H.S.; Ahn, J.; Song, J.H.; Chang, I.B. Spontaneous Regression of Aneurysm Remnant after Incomplete Surgical Clipping in a Patient with Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 2016, 18, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fodstad, H.; Liliequist, B. Spontaneous thrombosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms during treatment with tranexamic acid (AMCA). Report of three cases. Acta Neurochir. 1979, 49, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moritake, K.; Handa, H.; Ohtsuka, S.; Hashimoto, N. Vanishing cerebral aneurysm in serial angiography. Surg. Neurol. 1981, 16, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Warschewske, G.; Benndorf, G.; Lehmann, T.H.; Lanksch, W. Spontaneous thrombosis of an intracranial giant aneurysm. Interv. Neuroradiol. 1999, 5, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marguth, F.; Schiefer, W. Spontaneous healing of an intracranial aneurysm detected by angiography. Acta Neurochir. 1957, 5, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hook, O.; Norlen, G. Aneurysms of the Internal Carotid Artery. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1964, 40, 200–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yeh, H.; Tomsick, T.A. Obliteration of a giant carotid aneurysm after extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgery: Case report. Surg. Neurol. 1997, 48, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cantore, G.; Santoro, A.; Da Pian, R. Spontaneous occlusion of supraclinoid aneurysms after the creation of extra-intracranial bypasses using long grafts: Report of two cases. Neurosurgery 1999, 44, 216–219, discussion 219–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Senn, P.; Krauss, J.K.; Remonda, L.; Godoy, N.; Schroth, G. The formation and regression of a flow-related cerebral artery aneurysm. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2000, 102, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hans, F.J.; Krings, T.; Reinges, M.H.; Mull, M. Spontaneous regression of two supraophthalmic internal cerebral artery aneurysms following flow pattern alteration. Neuroradiology 2004, 46, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chow, M.M.; Thorell, W.E.; Rasmussen, P.A. Aneurysm regression after coil embolization of a concurrent aneurysm. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Li, Y.; Payner, T.D.; Cohen-Gadol, A.A. Spontaneous regression of an intracranial aneurysm after carotid endarterectomy. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2012, 3, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tsimpas, A.; Ashley, W.W.; Germanwala, A.V. Spontaneous regression of intracranial aneurysm following remote ruptured aneurysm treatment with pipeline stent assisted coiling. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2016, 8, e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, S.; Kang, M.; Jo, J.; Kim, D. Spontaneous Regression of an Intracranial Aneurysm Following Remote Aneurysm Clipping: Evaluation with High-Resolution Vessel Wall MRI. CardioVasc. Interv. Radiol. 2018, 41, 660–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boillat, G.; Franssen, T.; Wanderer, S.; Grüter, B.E.; Catalano, K.; Casoni, D.; Widmer, H.R.; Remonda, L.; Andereggen, L.; Fandino, J.; et al. Development and characterization of a dual saccular elastase digested aneurysms rabbit model. Brain Spine 2021, 1, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiang, J.; Yu, J.; Choi, H.; Dolan Fox, J.M.; Snyder, K.V.; Levy, E.I.; Siddiqui, A.H.; Meng, H. Rupture Resemblance Score (RRS): Toward risk stratification of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using hemodynamic-morphological discriminants. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2015, 7, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Brainsci 15 00488 g001
Figure 1. Prisma flowchart. Of n = 606 studies identified through the combined search strategy, finally, n = 33 papers were included in the literature review.
Figure 1. Prisma flowchart. Of n = 606 studies identified through the combined search strategy, finally, n = 33 papers were included in the literature review.
Brainsci 15 00488 g001
Brainsci 15 00488 g002
Figure 2. Illustrative panel showing intracranial hemorrhage unrelated to the IA. Initial CT scan (A) shows parieto-occipital hemorrhage on the right hemisphere, and the corresponding CT angiography (B) shows a saccular IA of the ACom artery (arrow). Nine years later, CT imaging reveals a recurrent hemorrhage in the right temporal region (C), while the previously detected IA has regressed in size (arrow in (D)).
Figure 2. Illustrative panel showing intracranial hemorrhage unrelated to the IA. Initial CT scan (A) shows parieto-occipital hemorrhage on the right hemisphere, and the corresponding CT angiography (B) shows a saccular IA of the ACom artery (arrow). Nine years later, CT imaging reveals a recurrent hemorrhage in the right temporal region (C), while the previously detected IA has regressed in size (arrow in (D)).
Brainsci 15 00488 g002
Brainsci 15 00488 g003
Figure 3. Illustrative example of spontaneous IA regression. Initial DSA (A) and the corresponding 3D reconstruction (B) show a saccular IA of the anterior communicating artery (arrow) with a size of 3 × 4 mm at the time of diagnosis. At the 9-year follow-up (C,D), the former IA visibly regressed (arrow) to a size of 2 × 2.5 mm without any interventions. Imaging did not reveal any signs of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis or wall calcification.
Figure 3. Illustrative example of spontaneous IA regression. Initial DSA (A) and the corresponding 3D reconstruction (B) show a saccular IA of the anterior communicating artery (arrow) with a size of 3 × 4 mm at the time of diagnosis. At the 9-year follow-up (C,D), the former IA visibly regressed (arrow) to a size of 2 × 2.5 mm without any interventions. Imaging did not reveal any signs of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis or wall calcification.
Brainsci 15 00488 g003
Table 1. Overview of studies reporting on IA regression. Studies can be summarized in four categories: First, those just reporting on IA regression as a rare phenomenon; second, those concluding that IA regression is rare, unpredictable, and uncontrollable; third, those suggesting a (patho-)physiological mechanism to explain the regression; and fourth, those suggesting hemodynamic changes to be the underlying reason for IA regression.
Table 1. Overview of studies reporting on IA regression. Studies can be summarized in four categories: First, those just reporting on IA regression as a rare phenomenon; second, those concluding that IA regression is rare, unpredictable, and uncontrollable; third, those suggesting a (patho-)physiological mechanism to explain the regression; and fourth, those suggesting hemodynamic changes to be the underlying reason for IA regression.
YearAuthorsLocation and
Number of IAs		TreatmentPeculiarityConclusion
(1)
Description of rare cases with spontaneous IA regression
1944Dandy et al. [15]Different IA locationsClippingSummary of different locations of IAs and their surgical accessibility.Six surgical methods to possibly cure an IA, as spontaneous thrombosis occurs only rarely.
1953Epstein et al. [16]ACom, n = 1NoneRoentgenological demonstration of IA by pneumo-encephalogram.Cerebral angiography as the most reliable method of diagnosis for the detection of IAs.
1958Lindgren et al. [17]MCA, n = 1NoneSAH patient.Regression over three years.
1960Hemmer and Umbach [18]MCA/ posterior cerebral artery (PCA), n = 1NoneVisible IA two and nine weeks after hemorrhage. Not visible after six months.Rarity of follow-ups in cases with arteriographically confirmed obliteration.
1962Björkesten and Troupp [19]Different IA locations, n = 25Unsuccessful treatment by clippingTwo-year follow-up showed an occlusion of the IA.Rare occurrence of spontaneous thrombosis of an IA after attempted clipping.
1964Schunk et al. [20]Literature review and case report, different IA locationsNoneContrast retention within IA in all three phases as a predisposing factor of thrombus formation.Displacement of vessels adjacent to the partially thrombosed IA as an indicator of size and location of the thrombus.
1966Lodin et al. [21]PCom (posterior communicating artery), n = 1
Left superior cerebellar artery, n = 1		ClippingUnsuccessful treatment by clipping.Follow-up angiography in incidental and non-operated ruptured IA is justified, since they tend to increase in size.
1978Edner et al. [22]ACom, n = 1NoneAdministration of dexa-methasone and EACA.Impossibility of prediction of the spontaneous thrombosis of ruptured IA without intervention due to its rare occurrence.
1977Scott and Garrido [23]MCA, n = 1Epsilon amino-caproic acidGiant IA.Spontaneous thrombosis of an IA is a rare event.
1981Spallone et al. [24]Supraclinoid ICA (internal carotid artery), n = 1NoneSpontaneous cure of an IA after recurrent SAH.Rarity of spontaneous cure of IAs.
1983Benedetti et al. [25]ACom, n = 1ClippingDespite negative angiographic control, the patient was operated, and the aneurysmal sac was the parent.An IA, revealed at operation, failed to opacify in the absence of vasospasm and thrombosis of parent vessels.
2004Ueta et al. [26]ICA, n = 1NoneFirst reported case of a ruptured IA at non-branching site of the supraclinoid ICA with complete spontaneous regression.Spontaneous regression of IA can occur even at non-branching sites without intervention or treatment.
2009Hassan et al. [27]Anterior cerebral artery (ACA), n = 1
SAH		ClippingSpontaneous thrombosis of a recurrent clipped IA.Spontaneous thrombosis of an IA remnant may occur even without further treatment.
(2) 
Rarity, unpredictability, and uncontrollability of IA regression
1972Scott and Ballantine [28]MCA, n = 1NoneProgressive thrombosis of a giant IA and the underlying MCA branch.Probably non-operative treatment should be preferred.
1974Spetzler et al. [8]Left frontopolar artery, n = 1ClippingDisappearance and reappearance of an IA.Terms such as “complete” and “spontaneous” cure must be used with caution, since the natural history of IA is not understood yet.
1984Davila et al. [29]ACom, n = 1NoneSpontaneous thrombosis of an IA.Three conditions necessary for spontaneous cure: (1) favorable neurological status, (2) complete disappearance of the IA on imaging, and (3) confirmation of its regression without intervention.
2001Tan et al. [30]MCA, n = 1ClippingRe-clipping of a remnant five months post initial operation. Further regrowth due to an unsuccessful bypass.Unpredictability of growth and regression of IAs.
2010Choi et al. [31]MCA, n = 1Wrapping using pericranium and surgical glueStability for one year, regression after three years.Recanalization may occur also in completely thrombosed IA, with possibility of growth or rupture.
2011Kalin-Hajdu et al. [32]MCA, n = 1NoneAngiography on scheduled embolization revealed that the IA had already undergone complete thrombosis.Spontaneous occlusion and regression of a IA is exceptional and unpredictable.
2016Jun et al. [33]ACom, n = 1ClippingReluctance from the patient regarding reoperation.Absence of a reliable methods to predict whether an IA remnant will spontaneously regress or grow.
(3) 
Pathophysiological mechanism of IA regression
1979Fodstad et al. [34]MCA, n = 1AMCA (tranexamic acid)Spontaneous thrombosis might occur more often when anti-fibrinolytic drugs are administered.Possible local inhibition of plasminogen activators in and around the IA wall when using AMCA.
1981Moritake et al. [35]PCom, n = 1NoneRuptured IA.Crucial roles of vasospasms and relative narrowness of the aneurysmal neck in cases of spontaneous IA thrombosis.
1999Warschewske et al. [36]Anterior cerebral artery (ACA), n = 1NoneSpontaneous thrombosis of a giant IA.Spontaneous thrombosis may occur under certain anatomic and hemodynamic conditions. Conservative management and follow-up examinations in asymptomatic patients is suggested.
(4) 
Hemodynamic changes as a reason for IA regression
1957Marguth et al. [37]ICA, n = 1NoneSpontaneous SAH at age thirteen yeats, regression on control thirteen years later.Fully visible IA sac in the arterial phase, only contrast residuals visible in the early and late venous phases.
1964Höök and Norlen [38]MCA, n = 1Ligation of the aneurysmal neckImpossibility of contrast filling of the carotid artery through an acute cerebral edema.Intracranial treatment methods for IA are more effective and should be preferred.
1997Yeh et al. [39]Terminal ICA, n = 1EC–IC bypassSpontaneous thrombosis of the IA at two-year follow-up.Hemodynamic changes in the blood flow of the parent artery after EC–IC bypass caused obliteration.
1999Cantore et al. [40]Supraclinoid ICA, n = 2Clipping/ BypassPostoperative angiography demonstrated spontaneous occlusion of the IAs.Spontaneous occlusion of an IA may be induced or favoured by hemodynamic vascular alterations that take place inside the IA after a high-flow EC-IC bypass has been created.
2000Senn et al. [41]PCom, n = 1Carotid end-arterectomy (CEA)Regression after ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.Formation and regression of the ‘flow-related’ IA was associated with hemodynamic changes in blood flow of the right posterior communicating artery (PCoA) and the right ICA.
2004Hans et al. [42]ICA, n = 3 (1 giant cavernous ICA aneurysm, 2 supra-ophthalmic IAs)Endo-vascular closureSpontaneous regression of two supraophthalmic IAs following flow pattern alteration by proximal ICA IA treatment.Changes in cerebral hemodynamics might potentially lead to plastic changes in the vessel architecture, therefore IAs can be flow related.
2005Chow et al. [43]Paraclinoidal ICA, n = 2Endovascular treatmentDisappearance of an ICA aneurysm after endovascular treatment of a concurrent ipsilateral ICA aneurysm.Hemodynamic alterations may contribute to regression.
2012Li et al. [44]ICA, n = 1Carotid end-arterectomy (CEA)Spontaneous regression of an intracranial IA after carotid endarterectomy.Regression and potential formation of IAs may correlate with hemodynamic factors associated with stenosis of the contralateral ICA.
2015Tsimpas et al. [45] ICA, n = 3
right MCA, n = 1
left MCA, n = 1		Coiling/ Flow DiverterRegression of a downstream M2-aneurysm after Flow Diverter treatment of ICA aneurysms.Changing flow dynamics of a proximal vessel may eventually lead to spontaneous regression of a downstream IA.
2018Kim et al. [46]Right anterior temporal artery, n = 1ClippingRegression after contralateral MCA clipping.Spontaneous occlusion may occur even without direct treatment. High-resolution MRI may provide insights into morphology and IA changes over time.
Table 2. Quantitative summary of key metrics.
Table 2. Quantitative summary of key metrics.
Patient AgeAneurysm LocationAneurysm SizeFollow-Up Duration
56 y/oACom3 × 4 mm (diagnosis)
2 × 2.5 mm (FU)		9 years
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Catalano, K.; Andereggen, L.; Schubert, G.A.; Marbacher, S.; Grüter, B.E. Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050488

AMA Style

Catalano K, Andereggen L, Schubert GA, Marbacher S, Grüter BE. Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(5):488. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Catalano, Kristina, Lukas Andereggen, Gerrit A. Schubert, Serge Marbacher, and Basil E. Grüter. 2025. "Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature" Brain Sciences 15, no. 5: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050488

APA Style

Catalano, K., Andereggen, L., Schubert, G. A., Marbacher, S., & Grüter, B. E. (2025). Spontaneous Regression of Intracranial Aneurysms—Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature. Brain Sciences, 15(5), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop