Correction: Matsutake et al. Fast and Stable Responses during Decision Making Require Strong Inhibitory Processes in Soccer Players. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 199

In the original publication [1], an error occurred in the presentation of Table 4. Specifically, Table 4 intended to describe the peak latencies and amplitudes of the subtracted No-go N2 and P3. However, the results as presented were incorrect because they failed to reflect that P3 is a positive potential, as accurately outlined in the Statistical Analysis section. Below, the corrected

Table 4. Peak latencies and amplitudes of subtracted No-go N2 and P3.

		Go/No-Go Task			Pass Choice Reaction Task
Electrode		Novice	Low	High	Novice	Low	High
Subtracted No-go N2 Amplitude (μV)	Fz	−6.5 ± 5.3	−11.8 ± 5.3	−12.3 ± 6.9	−3.8 ± 3.8	−9.3 ± 6.1	−11.4 ± 3.7
	F3	−9.2 ± 4.6	−14.0 ± 4.2	−13.9 ± 5.3	−3.9 ± 3.1	−9.3 ± 5.8	−11.1 ± 5.0
	F4	−9.4 ± 4.9	−13.3 ± 1.9	−13.3 ± 4.7	−5.1 ± 3.8	−8.2 ± 3.5	−9.5 ± 2.5
Subtracted No-go N2 Latency (ms)	Fz	287 ± 17	285 ± 23	282 ± 53	343 ± 31	336 ± 24	320 ± 19
	F3	286 ± 17	287 ± 25	285 ± 50	339 ± 27	341 ± 25	322 ± 20
	F4	281 ± 38	284 ± 20	290 ± 66	347 ± 36	336 ± 25	319 ± 38
Subtracted No-go P3 Amplitude (μV)	Fz	20.4 ± 9.2	15.5 ± 9.3	17.2 ± 10.1	11.0 ± 8.0	11.2 ± 8.9	12.3 ± 6.1
	F3	16.4 ± 7.0	9.7 ± 10.4	13.4 ± 8.7	10.6 ± 8.0	7.8 ± 7.2	10.1 ± 4.5
	F4	15.3 ± 7.3	12.7 ± 8.0	14.5 ± 9.5	6.6 ± 5.3	9.8 ± 6.8	11.4 ± 5.5
Subtracted No-go P3 Latency (ms)	Fz	425 ± 90	388 ± 19	397 ± 18	448 ± 33	464 ± 47	445 ± 24
	F3	421 ± 90	392 ± 23	388 ± 16	506 ± 69	453 ± 34	430 ± 30
	F4	430 ± 85	407 ± 42	404 ± 16	415 ± 119	462 ± 39	425 ± 104

The data are expressed as mean ± SD.

is provided. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.