This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Prejudice Formation in Childhood: How Parental Bonding Can Affect Social Dominance Orientation
by
Serenella Tolomeo
Serenella Tolomeo 1,†,
Shannen Koh
Shannen Koh 2,† and
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito 3,*
1
Social and Cognitive Computing Department, Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138632, Singapore
2
Psychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639818, Singapore
3
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1147; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111147 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 September 2025
/
Revised: 14 October 2025
/
Accepted: 16 October 2025
/
Published: 25 October 2025
Abstract
Background. How individuals develop and form perspectives of those around them differs from person to person. Factors such as childhood parental bonding styles can affect how prejudice forms. Social dominance in adulthood may also be affected by childhood experiences through the bonding received. Not many studies examine how an individual’s Social Dominance Orientationcan be influenced by parental bonding styles in childhood. Furthermore, few studies that investigated neural correlates are associated with these two variables. As such, this study aims to establish how parental bonding in childhood affects brain regions that are also implicated in adult SDO. Methods. Ninety-one participants were recruited and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Parental Bonding Index (PBI) were collected. We used DARTEL package in SPM12 to conduct a whole-brain analysis. The ROI analyses were focused on amygdala grey matter volume (GMV). Results. This study identified a strong correlation between PBI and SDO. Interestingly, PBICare and PBIProtection scores significantly predicted SDO scores. SDO was positively associated with amygdala GMV, PBICare was negatively associated with amygdala GMV, and PBIProtection was positively associated with amygdala GMV. Conclusions. Our results show that PBI and SDO are highly correlated as well as their association with the amygdala and other key regions of the brain.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Tolomeo, S.; Koh, S.; Esposito, G.
Prejudice Formation in Childhood: How Parental Bonding Can Affect Social Dominance Orientation. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 1147.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111147
AMA Style
Tolomeo S, Koh S, Esposito G.
Prejudice Formation in Childhood: How Parental Bonding Can Affect Social Dominance Orientation. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(11):1147.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111147
Chicago/Turabian Style
Tolomeo, Serenella, Shannen Koh, and Gianluca Esposito.
2025. "Prejudice Formation in Childhood: How Parental Bonding Can Affect Social Dominance Orientation" Brain Sciences 15, no. 11: 1147.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111147
APA Style
Tolomeo, S., Koh, S., & Esposito, G.
(2025). Prejudice Formation in Childhood: How Parental Bonding Can Affect Social Dominance Orientation. Brain Sciences, 15(11), 1147.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111147
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.